2.1 An Introduction to the International Court of Justice

This lecture is by Cecily Rose, an Assistant Professor of International Law and a fellow at the Grotius Centre for International Legal Studies and Leiden Law School.
Do you want to learn more and practice with the content? You’ll find this online university course for free at coursera.org
This video by Leiden University is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommerical-ShareAlike 3.0 Netherlands License (see creativecommons.org/licenses/b.... Contact: [e-mail]

[@MuhammadAli-jq7tj]

A well versed explained

[@Xores263]

Great work thank you

[@GopalRoy-nn6ft]

wow ...
.that's awesome brief explanation...i loved it....👍

[@jacobzaranyika9334]

Thank you🙏
I will watch this later

[@lawwithghulamnabiabbasi7897]

very Informative

[@sarangsaharkar2955]

very useful

[@noirbovine1848]

I edged to this

[@MrDevil00100]

Great Job!!

[@nazarkazmi9270]

I translated the court introduction in Urdu language in December 2016. Please send me this video if anybody has.

[@guglielmotaffini7594]

prima! dank u

[@MohamedAhmed-lr3zw]

Unfortunately, or fortunately, last November (2017) Britain was not represented in the ICJ for the first time that the 5 permanent members are not all represented in ICJ.

[@rikybologna3579]

The fact that the UNSC still having 5 permanent Members nowadays is so detrimental and demonstrates how much Ius Gentium needs to evolve itself even now.

[@moldiemort]

hand gestures on point!!

[@funsky77]

Who calls the ICJ a "World Court"?

[@PUBLICcfcUSA]

So what 😎👍

[@bantalee2002]

So why doesn't the United States and other interested nations take China into this ICJ and settle the South China Sea dispute?. or did they and we were not told of the outcome?

[@rikybologna3579]

Each Atates should make a unilateral declaration to official recognise the ICJ rule. Just stated this, the USA made its own one affirming that customary international law should be applied to them only despite conventional one, that can be applied if all Parts of a treaty are the very same ones of a dispute. Overall, this may become an advantage or a disadvantage according to the particular dispute rulled. Thus, universal accepted customary international law (opinio iuris sive necessitatis + diuturnitas of the majority of Intermational Community's States) is not providing enough to solve what you mentioned about China probably.

[@msrabiahealthcarecenterand2058]

I seen an introduction to the international court of justice.

[@moldiemort]

oath! Loves it!!