Chach and Rai dynasty are two different dynasty. Rai dynasty was Buddhist and ruled before chach dynasty. The chach killed the Rai and gained the throne. Link "Brahmin dynasty of Sindh - Wikipedia" en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmin_dynasty_of_Sindh The video is not well researched
@thealchemist6133 Whenever any source don't support you that doesn't mean the source is wong. Wikipedia provided the fact with valid source and wiki content requires valid source material and that source material was reviewed by reviewer worldwide before final publication. This publication process by which Wikipedia publishes content is what makes Wikipedia a very reliable source. Just don't see the content. Try to see what is behind that content. When Wikipedia banned or edit Hindu content it doesn't mean that Wikipedia is Hindu phobic, it simply means Hindus didn't provide sources that fulfill condition for reliability: books written by unknown author, anonymous web content, article written by anybody published in less popular journal etc. And contents from platforms like prachyam, swarajya mag, bharat varsh project, upword are pure narrative propaganda that Wikipedia doesn't accept. I don't think any credible journal will ever accept such content. Hope i dhade enough light on Wikipedia
@netaji-thebritishslayer "Irfan Habib - Wikipedia" en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irfan_Habib Look at the academic and position area. He was a full fledged professor at a UGC recognised university in India and royal society of history in United Kingdom. He held chairman position in Indian council of historical research and indian history congress. Besides all of these he is a PhD and masters in history from Amu and Oxford. "Romila Thapar - Wikipedia" en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romila_Thapar She is also phd from SOAS University uk and look at the award section : she was awarded honorary doctorate from big institution all over the world. Now you tell me from common sense who is more reliable?? A person who was certified by authorities allover the world or who was an unknown unqualified platform making videos with more visual effects than true fact ?? Then you'll understand why Wikipedia accepted romilla thapar and Irfan Habib instead of prachyam and bharat varsha project Some may say that Irfan Habib is doing islamic propaganda but then authorities all over the world will not support a propagandist. Big authorities can't be wrong. Habib was awarded by American historical association and new college Oxford. He was also a member of royal society of history uk. He will not be awarded by foreigners if he is Muslim propagandist. So is romilla thapar. Think again before blaming Wikipedia
We stand today by the sacrifices of our ancestors. 1300 years and still resisting the invasion of our culture.
content in ur channel is marvelous
అద్భుతం, మీ కృషి అద్వితీయం
If only Indian Kings were more united then no foreign invaders would have dared to even Invade
Keep covering about unsung bhartiya sanatani heroes
🇮🇳 वंदे मातरम। 🙏
SHIVSHIV
Hinduekta
KRISHNKRISHN
keep Going sir
History told as it should be
Chach aur dahir bharat k itihas ki do kamjor kadiya aur jaativaad ki shuruat aur bharat jambudwip ko kamjor karne me sabse bada yogdaan.
Bro Hindi m bnao
Please select the settings on UA-cam player to change the audio to Hindi or English and other languages
The legendery muhammed gazni and ghori 🔥🔥
Good story 😂😂😂
Mangol rs 400 rules India
Chach and Rai dynasty are two different dynasty. Rai dynasty was Buddhist and ruled before chach dynasty. The chach killed the Rai and gained the throne.
Link
"Brahmin dynasty of Sindh - Wikipedia" en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmin_dynasty_of_Sindh
The video is not well researched
Kahaniyan researched thodi na hoti 😂😂
source -wikipedia,,,, bong for a reason lol...
@thealchemist6133
Whenever any source don't support you that doesn't mean the source is wong. Wikipedia provided the fact with valid source and wiki content requires valid source material and that source material was reviewed by reviewer worldwide before final publication. This publication process by which Wikipedia publishes content is what makes Wikipedia a very reliable source.
Just don't see the content. Try to see what is behind that content.
When Wikipedia banned or edit Hindu content it doesn't mean that Wikipedia is Hindu phobic, it simply means Hindus didn't provide sources that fulfill condition for reliability: books written by unknown author, anonymous web content, article written by anybody published in less popular journal etc.
And contents from platforms like prachyam, swarajya mag, bharat varsh project, upword are pure narrative propaganda that Wikipedia doesn't accept. I don't think any credible journal will ever accept such content.
Hope i dhade enough light on Wikipedia
@@arnabkumarbanerjee8150 lolz if prachyam,bharta varsh is propaganda ,then why wikpedia accepted irfan habib adn romila thapar lolz
@netaji-thebritishslayer
"Irfan Habib - Wikipedia" en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irfan_Habib
Look at the academic and position area. He was a full fledged professor at a UGC recognised university in India and royal society of history in United Kingdom. He held chairman position in Indian council of historical research and indian history congress.
Besides all of these he is a PhD and masters in history from Amu and Oxford.
"Romila Thapar - Wikipedia" en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romila_Thapar
She is also phd from SOAS University uk and look at the award section : she was awarded honorary doctorate from big institution all over the world.
Now you tell me from common sense who is more reliable?? A person who was certified by authorities allover the world or who was an unknown unqualified platform making videos with more visual effects than true fact ??
Then you'll understand why Wikipedia accepted romilla thapar and Irfan Habib instead of prachyam and bharat varsha project
Some may say that Irfan Habib is doing islamic propaganda but then authorities all over the world will not support a propagandist. Big authorities can't be wrong.
Habib was awarded by American historical association and new college Oxford. He was also a member of royal society of history uk. He will not be awarded by foreigners if he is Muslim propagandist.
So is romilla thapar.
Think again before blaming Wikipedia
Muslim ruler 800 years😂
Oh you forgot we Maharashtrian Hindus ruled India for 200 years before British and those Chuslim rulers had to pay 1/4 th tax to us.