@@dankhelmet9973 Madam Tussard's... they can make very real looking life-like replicas of just about any person ! As long there's enough funding, corruption culture & various imperfections in the 'system' etc., i remain confident almost any storyline can be created & the herd & MSM guillable lot would buy it anyway ?!?!!
@@dominionjoe4901 You want to believe that then suit yourself. As far as I'm concerned, in view of the numerous indicative signs practically all over the place which I've come to observe, know & coupled with huge dose of real common sense etc., i do NOT buy this idea of any Demo-rat Biden 'win', irregardless how much the MSM tries to 'convincingly proof' that's what they want to be so !
+UltimateBargains these guys think that they are living in a James Bond movie.And he says that a 15 year old kid with a lot of time in his hand can do it.
And to his point, these ABC agents claim to be concerned about our safety, when we know.. WE ARE AWARE... that the government does not care about our safety or privacy... it is all about controlling us.... WE KNOW.... more and more of us are waking up to this!
IR Geek - you are absolutely correct. But keep in mind, I am speaking with the press. I look like an idiot because I am speaking to idiots. can you imagine me explaining the A7 or A6 chip architecture, secure enclave co-processors, isolated memory, UIDs, etc. I did the only thing I could do - drag them, kicking and screaming into the early 1980s.
+John Mcafee Unfortunate truth. I don't even understand why they need a software modification if they already have the physical phone in their hands. FBI has no engineers who can remove a few screws and pull the flash memory chips? Or they are afraid to void Apple warranty?
+John Mcafee The Government has put really Apple into a no win situation with this debacle. If they unlock the phone, no one will trust their phones to be safe and their stock goes down.. If they refuse the government bashes them using national security argument to justify trying to force a company to break into a phone, and their stock goes down. It is my understanding that a warrant has to be specific as to what they are looking for, not just a fishing trip into a phone that may contain NOTHING... Personally, as a computer hardware technician I don't see how it would even be possible to go into a locked encrypted phone and change a program that is already in RAM. It's not like the movie TRON where you just ride a motorcycle around in computer circuits changing things. You might be able to clone the code and look at it, but if it's already encrypted, it won't be clear text that is "readable"! Apple should tell the government it CAN"T break into the phone, not that it WON'T ....Apple stock goes UP... Warm fuzzies for everyone except the FBI
+Neon Albino I know right! If the host would have interrupted Mr Mcafee, I'm sure he might have really said what was on his mind...That the FBI doesn't have a constitutional right to force or compel a free market, public company to give them the keys to proprietary software just because they think it might some day hopefully stop a terrorist action. It's easy for them to play on people fears to voluntarily give up protections afforded under the constitution because the government says they can keep a secret. Sheesh... Just look at the Hillary email scandal! She should be in prison. I worked for the State Department for ten years. Had I done what she did, I would have been fired right before being locked up by the FBI for treason! Foreign intelligence agencies are good at what they do and our government computers are probed millions of times a year. They LOVE arrogant politicians who use unsecured servers!!! OMG, I need to go punch my punching bag now....
@@redman0324 is it now though? Simply because I finished the quote? (As far as I know there is a longer version of the quote that ends with what I added.) I'm curious though. What generation am I from?
+Gregory The only difference between physical and remote is the way it is utilized. If you have something you can plug into the phone physically to run the backdoor code on, you can insert that code into any app on the appstore, any update to the iOS system, literally any software that runs on the phone, and garner the same results. The only difference would be adding a section of it that took all gathered info and sent it back to you.
Well there are no legal consequences and people are not shamed for it. It's Snowden who has to hide out in Russia now just for warning people about it as what he did was wrong not what they did?
snowflakesafespace I wouldn't call Mr. ex-FBI agent Steve Rogers clueless. However, you are on the right track. I would prefer to think of his kind of thinking and justification as dangerous. He is anything but clueless.
ROGERS: I could buy the privacy issue if this was minor criminal activity. MCAFEE: This is not a matter of privacy vs security (0:51) MCAFEE: This is not a matter of privacy vs security (1:11) ROGERS: I get the Privacy Act (2:11) MCAFEE: I didn't mention privacy (2:22) ROGERS: I understand the privacy position (3:38) Agenda much
So using the FBI's logic, let's make every single door lock in America the same and give the FBI the master key because of "National Security" and "Think of the American people safety :( "
2:03 John's stunned expression at that utterly embarrassing attempt by the FBI loser to move the goalposts and throw out nonsensical word salad is priceless.
John Mcafee you make such valid points here. I bet there were hackers sat with smug faces as this went on saying "well I cracked it... why can't the FBI?"
djkronokun - there is nothing inside a game console of value. no credit cards, no bank statements, no compromising photos, no lurid emails, no intrigue, nothing that could be used for blackmail or extortion. who in their right mind would want to hack a game console?
+John Mcafee They frequently do contain or have access to the owners credit card information and access to anything on their home network (photos, etc.) and often have connected cameras sitting in peoples living room. Aside from what's *in* them they'd also have value as part of a botnet but the most obvious reasons for someone to hack them are commercial piracy or just so they can regain control and remove restrictions from their own device. These motivations might not be enticing to a state cyber-warfare program but they're certainly still motivating reasons. Anyway, my point was that a backdoor only carries the same inherent risk as any other remote services built into the device since it's essentially just treating Apple as the primary user rather than the phones owner.
+John Mcafee Why didn't you question his response when you mentioned the access to the cameras at 4.09 - His face is priceless when they cut back to him, it's the only time he broke character and by your response you seemed surprised also to what he mentioned?
+John Mcafee You're a smart guy right? Why are you playing around with FBI? Obviously they understand what they are doing, they are lying big time. You should just join Trump. Get real.
Because he want's to define his opposition as "pro privacy" and put it against "pro security". It's a trick the media does all the time trough how they frame questions.
That's what politicians do, they digress from the core problem and focus on something irrelevant to trick people into thinking that they are in the right.
McAfee's point was from the perspective of a technician. The more potent argument is the legal one: "We're at war!" the FBI says. So? We still have the Constitution, the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to protect against unreasonable searches and seizures. The FBI's job is to ENFORCE and UPHOLD the Constitution, and not just when it's convenient. If we're at war, then Congress can suspend Habeas Corpus, they can suspend certain rights, and they can amend the Constitution, but until then, law enforcement is bound by the laws of the land, which are there to protect us all. Besides, this "We're at war!" trope is a red herring. Objectively, Islamic terrorism is far less of a risk to Americans than regular crime, but the FBI can't animate the public's imagination with a run-of-the-mill white-collar embezzlement case like it can with a colorful shooting or bombing, so they use the spectre of terrorism to get their foot in the door. Once they're in, it's all over. Fight on, Apple. Fight on.
"We are at war!" the FBI says. ------------ With WHOM?! I've thought The Congress Only has power to declare war against other nation.. but it seems every moron from so called "services" does..(whom they are serving? Frankly not US people.) The war he is talking about, was invented by themselves for own purposes. There is NO nation waging war against US - Nobody. However, there is plenty evidence pointing that rogue US "services" do whatever they like in the name of US people - including waging wars overseas. Americans needs to wake up - this is not your country anymore. Now they want to wage war Inside US... against you. As a matter of fact, they do it already.
McAfee needs to plot with KimDotCom a way to get Julian Assange out of that stinking embassy and be free again, then after that the 3 of them will join forces with president elect Trump, and those 4 guys will hold the powerful torch of freedom and truth like we never expected to see so soon
Steve Rogers of the FBI is talking to one of the foremost experts and innovators in the security and tech space, however eccentric he may be, and he is just rolling his eyes and not even considering a different disposition. The mark of an intelligent man is one who can entertain an idea however not accept it. Steve Rogers is just out of touch.
*RICH PEOPLE PLAYS THE MONEY GAME TO WIN. POOR PEOPLE PLAYS THE MONEY GAME NOT TO LOSE. THE GOAL OF THE TRULY RICH PEOPLE IS TO HAVE MASSIVE WEALTH AND THE POOR SEES A SURPLUS AS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSUMPTION INSTEAD OF INVESTING IT. CHANGE YOUR MINDSET AND DO WHAT THE RICH DOES, WHICH IS INVESTING, INVESTING AND INVESTING.*..
Not sure, it seems often in mainstream media when certain important people are interviewed, they set up the surrounding area, say a bookshelf, to communicate things to spoOks and others who know how to interpret these comms. A sort of symbolic language exists among the intel community in this way, and this also leaves a lot of grey area for plausible deniability in case any rando should crack the code (JoeM on Twitter / parIer / Gab was adept at this and many instances of this are undeniable, which is why he was looked at as a sort of leader figure during the Q_anon posting days - He busted Comey many times 😉). ....So the letter Q here? Well, CNN and all the glow intel community knew *very well* who Q Group were (save this video *[new link]:* ua-cam.com/video/_JiOF68FbDs/v-deo.html ) and it is the same Group of "less than 10" individuals dropping intel and serving as a backchannel to the public during Trump's Admin. So when Q revealed to anons that they were *_that_* "Q," and not just some random sh¡tposter, the entire MSM, DC, and intel community flipped out and went into preemptive damage control mode and initiated a huge smear campaign so that the public quickly awakening to the corruption of DC (and the global political arena) wouldn't bother looking at Q posts. Massive campaigns of online paid shiIIs went into forums to discredit and ridicule Q's posts as being obtuse indecipherable nonsense and a waste of time, so to discourage the curious and general public from trying to interpret them, despite Q giving instructions on *_how_* to read their drops. It was an interesting time, and at the end of it all, many people feel Q led them on and left them high & dry (and the President as well). Others remain hopeful, and others strongly believe "the plan" is still in play. MANY times Q showed that they were the real deal, that much can be said. I don't know what to make of all of it, and I don't know what to make of these recent happenings. Hopefully something good can come from this. All the best and happy hunting.
@@jinkledarber8058 yo Bro, you're too simpleminded just as the majority of their viewers are, and they love mocking you for that reason. Wise up a little now..
That FBI guy just doesn't get it, does he? He just sits there repeating the same old political, fear mongering bullshit. He's got no clue what he is asking for.
Anyone else stopped wondering about how they thought up the tony stark personage? This man is the greatest. America, this could have been your president.
Did this dude just say he talked to some Japanese dudes on a Naval base about Nintendo? Someone should remind this guy we are in 2016. A lot of things have changed since the 80s. AOL has come and gone. Myspace has come and gone; Prince and Bowie are both dead; and it's no longer fashionable to wear pins on your lapel.
Steve Rogers was not FBI, he was a Nutley, NJ Police Officer once assigned to a Federal Task Force and has spent over a decade cashing in on his BS Status. He once wrote himself a parking ticket! LOON!
Fuck sake, the FBI dude was just pissing me off. They just don't get it... NOTHING IS SAFE ON THE INTERNET, Nothing, literally... They can't keep there own network safe...
+xIconikkxGaming not only on the internet, as long as there's enough interest and resources, anyone can get anything that doesn't break physics. If there was enough interest for this Iphone breaking backdoor, it wouldn't be long before some apple developpers's families got kidnapped in exchange for it.
+John Mcafee x = x XOR y y = x XOR y x = x XOR y Registers swapped. Can I have a job now please? :) Looks like you might have just scored a lucrative new contract from the FBI.
McAfee needs to plot with KimDotCom a way to get Julian Assange out of that stinking embassy and be free again, then after that the 3 of them will join forces with president elect Trump, and those 4 people will hold the powerful torch of freedom and truth like we never expected to see so soon
Wow those two fools had no idea what they were talking about. It was actually infuriating watching them say the same things over and over like broken records.
Government has no right to violate privacy of any individual. If they think they do, then everyone has the right to violate their claimed security info.
No, You can't. Your only safe, now, when you are zombified. The minute you show signs of life, a la Julian Assange or Chelsea Manning or William Binney or Jeffrey Stirling or Thomas Drake et al, Look out!
And they want to take our guns away. And the left applaud that. Jesus when the government wants something they will manipulate the masses and people will never be able to take the fact there government could be responsible for sandy hook
What did this guy say at 4:10 when you said, "watching our daughters when they're in the bathroom?" It sounded like, "and Richard, they have done that." Is that what he actually said?
John McAfee didn't kill himself. REST IN PEACE JOHN
He's not dead 😂
He is probably dead. There’s video of his wife speaking. She identified the body. She sounded pretty genuine to me.
@@dankhelmet9973 Madam Tussard's... they can make very real looking life-like replicas of just about any person ! As long there's enough funding, corruption culture & various imperfections in the 'system' etc., i remain confident almost any storyline can be created & the herd & MSM guillable lot would buy it anyway ?!?!!
@@hseochin Biden won fairly
@@dominionjoe4901 You want to believe that then suit yourself. As far as I'm concerned, in view of the numerous indicative signs practically all over the place which I've come to observe, know & coupled with huge dose of real common sense etc., i do NOT buy this idea of any Demo-rat Biden 'win', irregardless how much the MSM tries to 'convincingly proof' that's what they want to be so !
Amazing how John McAfee can maintain his composure when he is arguing with idiots. Well done, John.
+UltimateBargains these guys think that they are living in a James Bond movie.And he says that a 15 year old kid with a lot of time in his hand can do it.
Lol I see that too! He's a great man. One of the few people who will do the right thing even if no one is looking. That's what you call integrity!
When you literally eat s*** for fun. Maintaining composure is mere childs play!
carlos n ONLY idiots believe that SHITE
And to his point, these ABC agents claim to be concerned about our safety, when we know.. WE ARE AWARE... that the government does not care about our safety or privacy... it is all about controlling us.... WE KNOW.... more and more of us are waking up to this!
Who’s watching this with me now June 2021? RIP J McAfee
And what’s with the giant Q in the background?
أني والله .. خطية إچتلووه الرجال
$Whackd
Everyone thinks john was taken out. And I to think the same.
Im here.
"If I suicide myself, I didn't. I was whacked." -John McAfee, 11/30/19
true
Andy Kaufman like tattoo. John is trolling folks from his grave and it was premeditated.
IR Geek - you are absolutely correct. But keep in mind, I am speaking with the press. I look like an idiot because I am speaking to idiots. can you imagine me explaining the A7 or A6 chip architecture, secure enclave co-processors, isolated memory, UIDs, etc. I did the only thing I could do - drag them, kicking and screaming into the early 1980s.
Hats off to you for keeping your cool.
+John Mcafee Unfortunate truth. I don't even understand why they need a software modification if they already have the physical phone in their hands. FBI has no engineers who can remove a few screws and pull the flash memory chips? Or they are afraid to void Apple warranty?
+John Mcafee The Government has put really Apple
into a no win situation with this debacle. If they unlock the phone, no
one will trust their phones to be safe and their stock goes down.. If
they refuse the government bashes them using national security argument
to justify trying to force a company to break into a phone, and their
stock goes down. It is my understanding that a warrant has to be
specific as to what they are looking for, not just a fishing trip into a
phone that may contain NOTHING...
Personally, as a computer hardware technician I don't see how it would even be possible to go into a locked encrypted phone and change a program that is already in RAM. It's not like the movie TRON where you just ride a motorcycle around in computer circuits changing things. You might be able to clone the code and look at it, but if it's already encrypted, it won't be clear text that is "readable"!
Apple should tell the government it CAN"T break into the phone, not that it WON'T ....Apple stock goes UP... Warm fuzzies for everyone except the FBI
+Neon Albino I know right! If the host would have interrupted Mr Mcafee, I'm sure he might have really said what was on his mind...That the FBI doesn't have a constitutional right to force or compel a free market, public company to give them the keys to proprietary software just because they think it might some day hopefully stop a terrorist action. It's easy for them to play on people fears to voluntarily give up protections afforded under the constitution because the government says they can keep a secret. Sheesh... Just look at the Hillary email scandal! She should be in prison. I worked for the State Department for ten years. Had I done what she did, I would have been fired right before being locked up by the FBI for treason! Foreign intelligence agencies are good at what they do and our government computers are probed millions of times a year. They LOVE arrogant politicians who use unsecured servers!!! OMG, I need to go punch my punching bag now....
+jsn Sonny He is still running?
For those that can't follow a logical argument, I'll break it down: McAfee demolished both guys.
and they didn't even know it... mind hack.
You may want to look into cognitive biases.
or he just joined the Fbi
HAHAHAHA, this is all fucked up.
"We're at War". Sure you are, war with the American people. Complete control requires complete surveillance.
"Those that would trade liberty for security deserve neither." - Benjamin Franklin
... and will lose both.
@@GergelyGyurics obvious what generation you are from. Compartmentalized like most that breath, no understanding of what due diligence can render.
@@redman0324 is it now though? Simply because I finished the quote? (As far as I know there is a longer version of the quote that ends with what I added.)
I'm curious though. What generation am I from?
I would point you as a child of the early eighties, just to tender a guess sir.
@@redman0324 close. '87 :)
When the government walks in and says national security, you better watch out
"State" security.
John McAfee looks like aged Tony Stark.
+aeroson He kinda is
+aeroson Or Stark after a long weekend bender. (*Ack*...urp)
He looks pretty good for his age.
More honest too.
He was 70yrs old at that time.
He should've just said " we want an an easier way to spy on people" , because that's pretty much what he's implying.
Uhm it wouldn't be a remote back door, only a physical. I'm Still with apple tho
+Gregory The only difference between physical and remote is the way it is utilized. If you have something you can plug into the phone physically to run the backdoor code on, you can insert that code into any app on the appstore, any update to the iOS system, literally any software that runs on the phone, and garner the same results. The only difference would be adding a section of it that took all gathered info and sent it back to you.
Well there are no legal consequences and people are not shamed for it. It's Snowden who has to hide out in Russia now just for warning people about it as what he did was wrong not what they did?
Every single interview with McAfee is legendary
FBI: We are at war!
People: Yes we know.
You've created it, so you have an excuse to gather more info😂
the fbi guy is clueless.
snowflakesafespace I wouldn't call Mr. ex-FBI agent Steve Rogers clueless. However, you are on the right track. I would prefer to think of his kind of thinking and justification as dangerous. He is anything but clueless.
Marshall Brown good point. You're take is more precise.
He is not clueless, he knows everything. His job is to lie.
so was the host
He's just another DOG on a LEASH. Sucking up to his Boss.
ROGERS: I could buy the privacy issue if this was minor criminal activity.
MCAFEE: This is not a matter of privacy vs security (0:51)
MCAFEE: This is not a matter of privacy vs security (1:11)
ROGERS: I get the Privacy Act (2:11)
MCAFEE: I didn't mention privacy (2:22)
ROGERS: I understand the privacy position (3:38)
Agenda much
Jeff Hall,, Either *ROGERS* was showing stupidity or telling a lie,, But it's Both !!
What he is saying is Everyone in the USA is a terrorist and should be watched 24/7.
FBI Agent had a script to go off! This was a PR act, they tried to choose a good actor.
He'd rather set it up as merely a reduction in privacy for bad guys. He doesn't want to hear about causing insecurity.
It did sound like a scripted response.
“If the FBI does not have the capability then my heart is saddened” -Savage. RIP
By golly Rogers is a straight down clown. Rest In Peace legend.
They're talking in English but don't understand each other. I feel sorry for John trying to explain.
same 😕
LOL. "I'm speaking in English but you're listening in Dingbat!" ~ Archie Bunker
Oh, they understood each other. Fast forward 5 years into the future and the FBI continues on. Very sad.
Never trust anyone that uses the phrase "by golly."
It wasn't "by golly" it's "by god". I laugh at this because he is a scoundrel morally speaking, yet a genius when it comes to computers.
@@TheWolfgangfritz He's talking about the FBI guy who said "by golly".
@@TheWolfgangfritz Both were dooshbags.
lol
Preach
the way he offered him a deal in the end and McAffe is flabbergasted.. this is straight out a fucking Hollywood movie
"I get the privacy act"
Projecting his own dishonesty.
John's not even on the topic of privacy, the pre recorded bot is struggling
So using the FBI's logic, let's make every single door lock in America the same and give the FBI the master key because of "National Security" and "Think of the American people safety :( "
I think most would disagree with a deal of this magnitude (I am agreeing with you btw)
McAfee is a smart man
2:03
John's stunned expression at that utterly embarrassing attempt by the FBI loser to move the goalposts and throw out nonsensical word salad is priceless.
If you are willing to sacrifice liberty for security then you deserve neither
John Mcafee you make such valid points here. I bet there were hackers sat with smug faces as this went on saying "well I cracked it... why can't the FBI?"
bec they are lazy and stupid XD
FBI just wants a backdoor to everyones phones. Then someone will come in and take that key like they do every other sensitive information.
djkronokun - there is nothing inside a game console of value. no credit cards, no bank statements, no compromising photos, no lurid emails, no intrigue, nothing that could be used for blackmail or extortion. who in their right mind would want to hack a game console?
+John Mcafee They frequently do contain or have access to the owners credit card information and access to anything on their home network (photos, etc.) and often have connected cameras sitting in peoples living room. Aside from what's *in* them they'd also have value as part of a botnet but the most obvious reasons for someone to hack them are commercial piracy or just so they can regain control and remove restrictions from their own device.
These motivations might not be enticing to a state cyber-warfare program but they're certainly still motivating reasons.
Anyway, my point was that a backdoor only carries the same inherent risk as any other remote services built into the device since it's essentially just treating Apple as the primary user rather than the phones owner.
+John Mcafee Why didn't you question his response when you mentioned the access to the cameras at 4.09 - His face is priceless when they cut back to him, it's the only time he broke character and by your response you seemed surprised also to what he mentioned?
Well, I have to say the Xbox and the Wii does store your credit card information. That would be a good reason to hack into someone's gaming system.
The Kinect also had a camera in it. You could spy on someone through it.
+John Mcafee You're a smart guy right? Why are you playing around with FBI? Obviously they understand what they are doing, they are lying big time. You should just join Trump. Get real.
Anybody else noticed the q in the background
Yea first few seconds of the video in the logo for the segment called "Quesi means business", what about it?
It's funny that the FBI officer is named Steve Rogers but John McAfee is the real Captain America
mcafee would be more like Tony Stark.
How did the FBI guy bring up privacy, when John said that it wasn't about it.
Because he want's to define his opposition as "pro privacy" and put it against "pro security". It's a trick the media does all the time trough how they frame questions.
That's what politicians do, they digress from the core problem and focus on something irrelevant to trick people into thinking that they are in the right.
McAfee's point was from the perspective of a technician. The more potent argument is the legal one: "We're at war!" the FBI says. So? We still have the Constitution, the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to protect against unreasonable searches and seizures. The FBI's job is to ENFORCE and UPHOLD the Constitution, and not just when it's convenient. If we're at war, then Congress can suspend Habeas Corpus, they can suspend certain rights, and they can amend the Constitution, but until then, law enforcement is bound by the laws of the land, which are there to protect us all. Besides, this "We're at war!" trope is a red herring. Objectively, Islamic terrorism is far less of a risk to Americans than regular crime, but the FBI can't animate the public's imagination with a run-of-the-mill white-collar embezzlement case like it can with a colorful shooting or bombing, so they use the spectre of terrorism to get their foot in the door. Once they're in, it's all over. Fight on, Apple. Fight on.
"We are at war!" the FBI says.
------------
With WHOM?!
I've thought The Congress Only has power to declare war against other nation.. but it seems every moron from so called "services" does..(whom they are serving? Frankly not US people.)
The war he is talking about, was invented by themselves for own purposes.
There is NO nation waging war against US - Nobody.
However, there is plenty evidence pointing that rogue US "services" do whatever they like in the name of US people - including waging wars overseas.
Americans needs to wake up - this is not your country anymore.
Now they want to wage war Inside US... against you.
As a matter of fact, they do it already.
it's all planned by the Globalist Cult
If we are at war that means we can impose quasi Marshall law so that means admiralty proceedings
RIP Legend, give 'em hell - wherever you are.
He's in hell alright.
"our national security is at stake"...
He follows the script to a 'T'..!
To the host; Relax, we notice you. More than we should have to.
John McFee for Trump cyber security advisor
AGREED!
McAfee needs to plot with KimDotCom a way to get Julian Assange out of that stinking embassy and be free again, then after that the 3 of them will join forces with president elect Trump, and those 4 guys will hold the powerful torch of freedom and truth like we never expected to see so soon
McAfee wouldn't work with such a corporativist
Kaniseli Tupou trump has got Kaspersky.....ooops
Trump is 1 of them...
Steve Rogers of the FBI is talking to one of the foremost experts and innovators in the security and tech space, however eccentric he may be, and he is just rolling his eyes and not even considering a different disposition. The mark of an intelligent man is one who can entertain an idea however not accept it. Steve Rogers is just out of touch.
John McAfee is secretly a hero of mine.
Me too, I admire that guy.
God, we be better off if there was no FBI I dare say.
Also no CIA or NSA especially.
Or ATF.
John McAfee is right in my opinion and I hope that is shared by millions of people
*RICH PEOPLE PLAYS THE MONEY GAME TO WIN. POOR PEOPLE PLAYS THE MONEY GAME NOT TO LOSE. THE GOAL OF THE TRULY RICH PEOPLE IS TO HAVE MASSIVE WEALTH AND THE POOR SEES A SURPLUS AS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSUMPTION INSTEAD OF INVESTING IT. CHANGE YOUR MINDSET AND DO WHAT THE RICH DOES, WHICH IS INVESTING, INVESTING AND INVESTING.*..
You're right ma,
that's why I have to start forex trading 2months ago, now am making constant profit from it .
Trading systems allow you to limit the factor of emotional influence on decision-making,
as well as to give the trade a certain degree of systemic character.
To the newbies, you should also note that this data is worthless without an existing understanding of data analysis.
why is there a Q in the background
Not sure, it seems often in mainstream media when certain important people are interviewed, they set up the surrounding area, say a bookshelf, to communicate things to spoOks and others who know how to interpret these comms. A sort of symbolic language exists among the intel community in this way, and this also leaves a lot of grey area for plausible deniability in case any rando should crack the code (JoeM on Twitter / parIer / Gab was adept at this and many instances of this are undeniable, which is why he was looked at as a sort of leader figure during the Q_anon posting days - He busted Comey many times 😉).
....So the letter Q here? Well, CNN and all the glow intel community knew *very well* who Q Group were (save this video *[new link]:* ua-cam.com/video/_JiOF68FbDs/v-deo.html ) and it is the same Group of "less than 10" individuals dropping intel and serving as a backchannel to the public during Trump's Admin.
So when Q revealed to anons that they were *_that_* "Q," and not just some random sh¡tposter, the entire MSM, DC, and intel community flipped out and went into preemptive damage control mode and initiated a huge smear campaign so that the public quickly awakening to the corruption of DC (and the global political arena) wouldn't bother looking at Q posts.
Massive campaigns of online paid shiIIs went into forums to discredit and ridicule Q's posts as being obtuse indecipherable nonsense and a waste of time, so to discourage the curious and general public from trying to interpret them, despite Q giving instructions on *_how_* to read their drops.
It was an interesting time, and at the end of it all, many people feel Q led them on and left them high & dry (and the President as well). Others remain hopeful, and others strongly believe "the plan" is still in play.
MANY times Q showed that they were the real deal, that much can be said.
I don't know what to make of all of it, and I don't know what to make of these recent happenings. Hopefully something good can come from this.
All the best and happy hunting.
@@user-co4xl7wx3q video link is unavailable now :(
Bro calm down it's just part of the logo for this hosts segment seen in the beginning of the video "Quesi means business"
@@jinkledarber8058 yo Bro, you're too simpleminded just as the majority of their viewers are, and they love mocking you for that reason. Wise up a little now..
@@jinkledarber8058yeah i realized, and im not into q. mcafee was though
the guy representing the FBI is full of crap! NO BACK DOOR!!!! Get a warrant for what you want. PERIOD
All programs have backdoors that the developers install so they can gain access if theres problems they need to troubleshoot
That FBI guy just doesn't get it, does he? He just sits there repeating the same old political, fear mongering bullshit. He's got no clue what he is asking for.
Butt butt butt the Murican want to be safe frummmmm turrurrrism!!!!
“For the safety of American people” lol. That lie has died so fast like a nose dive.
I am watching today July 1st 2021. Thank you John McAfee. I appreciate your words of wisdom
The moderator anchor guy in this interview has a horrible speaking voice. Pretty aggressive. Like nails on a chalkboard.
GetuOne 3:42
Whattt-deddo
Mr. McAfee, you gave an intelligent discussion in this debate. I for one don't want them to have a master key to get into my phone.
THANK YOU JOHN !!!!!
Steve Rogers... FBI... that's not his real name.
Anyone else stopped wondering about how they thought up the tony stark personage? This man is the greatest.
America, this could have been your president.
David Mcafee makes strong and valid point. Excellent job sir.
+Obie Pimentel john not david
Wow! Captain America and Tony Stark squaring off in real life! Epic!
the moment i heard the interviewer talk , i looked at the cnn logo and was like "oh, i get it now"
FBI hold one half of the key, Apple hold the other? Oh dear, it's so quaint when journalists try to talk about CS matters.
Did this dude just say he talked to some Japanese dudes on a Naval base about Nintendo? Someone should remind this guy we are in 2016. A lot of things have changed since the 80s. AOL has come and gone. Myspace has come and gone; Prince and Bowie are both dead; and it's no longer fashionable to wear pins on your lapel.
also xbox > nintendo and sony
@@Synday Xbox is last in place.
I love how he lets the other guy finish before speaking, even though you could tell he was dying to jump in and interrupt. What an absolute gentleman.
It is truly hard, but patience is worth it.
Steve Rogers was not FBI, he was a Nutley, NJ Police Officer once assigned to a Federal Task Force and has spent over a decade cashing in on his BS Status. He once wrote himself a parking ticket! LOON!
Fuck sake, the FBI dude was just pissing me off. They just don't get it...
NOTHING IS SAFE ON THE INTERNET, Nothing, literally... They can't keep there own network safe...
+xIconikkxGaming not only on the internet, as long as there's enough interest and resources, anyone can get anything that doesn't break physics.
If there was enough interest for this Iphone breaking backdoor, it wouldn't be long before some apple developpers's families got kidnapped in exchange for it.
manaquri I agree.
That’s his game bro, the fbi guy has to divert the subject 😂
John macafee I can't believe you're the only logical person to tell them straight up 😂
FBI to McAfee on air!!: How about working together? I would say maybe it is the beginning of Mcafee's story!
Who is that screaming Englishman?? On point, as always John Mcafee.
If Rogers, and people like him, just admit that *they do not know* rather than pretending that they do, the world would be a much better place.
the fbi guy seems more like a politician...........
The fact that theres a Q in the background
It's part of the logo seen from the beginning of the video for a segment called "Quesi means business"
These things are disgusting. Are they human and we are not, or are we human and these creatures are something else?
How can this person be director of FBI. His argument is let apple build a back door. Because at some point others are going to get it. 😵
To the Ars Technica crowd. Read:
www.inverse.com/article/12277-john-mcafee-challenges-reddit
+John Mcafee
x = x XOR y
y = x XOR y
x = x XOR y
Registers swapped. Can I have a job now please? :) Looks like you might have just scored a lucrative new contract from the FBI.
+John Mcafee So where can I find the technically correct version of what you were describing as a way of hacking the phone?
hi
hi
McAfee needs to plot with KimDotCom a way to get Julian Assange out of that stinking embassy and be free again, then after that the 3 of them will join forces with president elect Trump, and those 4 people will hold the powerful torch of freedom and truth like we never expected to see so soon
Wow those two fools had no idea what they were talking about. It was actually infuriating watching them say the same things over and over like broken records.
Serious things are never to be discussed on phone.
Kudos John McAfee!!!! Thank you very much.
No wonder SIRI is always listening in day & night…..”they’re” keeping “us” safe, right?!! 👍😂
I love your work John. Your a genius. Keep sticking it to the man.
You jinxed it
Keep on fighting the good fight! People like you are what we need in the world.
Government has no right to violate privacy of any individual. If they think they do, then everyone has the right to violate their claimed security info.
why is the host screaming?, is he in pain?
Speed
No, he's just British
"Quesi means business" it's part of his bit/segment
This variant of Steve Rogers is very different from the Civil War variant. Hydra?
That FBI guy spoke so many words without actually saying anything.
Yet another in the long list of comments I don't remember writing.
The American people do not need protection. We can protect ourselves.
Hilla P Didn't Reagan say the most dangerous words in government are 'I'm here to help.'
No, You can't. Your only safe, now, when you are zombified. The minute you show signs of life, a la Julian Assange or Chelsea Manning or William Binney or Jeffrey Stirling or Thomas Drake et al, Look out!
And they want to take our guns away. And the left applaud that. Jesus when the government wants something they will manipulate the masses and people will never be able to take the fact there government could be responsible for sandy hook
This FBI chumps name is "Steve Rogers"? Isn't Captain America's name Steve Rogers? Anyone else see the irony?
Steve Rogers: Maybe you and the FBI can work together to find a happy medium.
John McAfee: *Stares menacingly* .
i tip my hat to you sir. a remarkable human being. keep up the good fight.
RIP John McAfee
John McCoffee, you're my hero
john love u buddy u gave the best advice i have ever had in my life advice i been following and i know im on the right path !!!!
Imagine being the man dubbed "The FBI"
What did this guy say at 4:10 when you said, "watching our daughters when they're in the bathroom?" It sounded like, "and Richard, they have done that." Is that what he actually said?
the host is extremely obnoxious
Just wait till this boat stops rockin.
RIP Genius
Rest In Peace, John. I hope that the people who murdered you are brought to justice.
RIP King
The FBI guy openly admitted that his main concern is the continuation of the US government not the individual privacy and security of each individual.
This is why I'm never getting an iPhone 😂(not that it matters though they'll probably get their way into every phone)
john thank you for standing up 2 the real teriost in this country..
Fear mongering ,sniff sniff smells like BS to me Steve Rodgers.
At war with who exactly?.🤣They already have the back doors to every thing. 🤣
Got to love the Q on the book shelf behind the fbi man!!!! LOL
Lol great spotting. CNN must by definition be domestic terrorists
It's part of the logo seen from the beginning of the video for a segment called "Quesi means business"
WERE AT WAR" "WERE AT WAR" WE ARE AT WAR" DO U POPLE NOT UNDERSTAND? DID U NOT HERE ME? "we are at war"
Edward Snowden said that the government can and have already, got into apple products. And this is just all for show.
If we are at war declare one. A general policy towards terrorism is not a declaration of war.
McAfee was such a respectful and polite speaker.