NATO Tests New Super Tank To Repel Russian Attack On Europe

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 чер 2024
  • On June 17, 2022, a prototype of a new German tank was shown at the Eurosatory exhibition in Paris to replace the aging Leopard-2. The new vehicle was named Panther KF51. The exact characteristics of this vehicle are not disclosed, and it is essentially a technology demonstrator, but the available data already allow us to get some idea about it.
    Demonstrating the brainchild of his company in front of numerous journalists, experts, and military men, Rheinmetall CEO Armin Papperger said that the Panther is a kind of continuation of the Leopard-2 family of tanks. This statement was probably made for two reasons.
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 76

  • @David-hi9rp
    @David-hi9rp 3 місяці тому +10

    The tank looks proper 21 century bad ass

    • @martijnijsendoorn6911
      @martijnijsendoorn6911 3 місяці тому

      its all fake!! the russians have much btr t-55's!! :)

    • @epicmonkey6124
      @epicmonkey6124 3 місяці тому

      do you mean the ones that are melted rubble in Ukraine xDD @@martijnijsendoorn6911

    • @zero.Identity
      @zero.Identity 3 місяці тому +1

      @@martijnijsendoorn6911 😂😂
      ah yes. fake. since when exactly has germany invented anything new that was fake after all? oh right, never. they actually invented the smartphone or computer you are typing this comment on too.

  • @davidlim5
    @davidlim5 3 місяці тому +4

    2 years supporting Ukraine war against Russia, now NATO only Testing new tanks again ???

    • @anthonynicholich9654
      @anthonynicholich9654 3 місяці тому +2

      What do you think they should do? 19 million Russians died from 1941 to 1945 trying to defend and run German invaders out of Soviet territory was not enough?? Now German thanks gotta go there again? The problem is the people that have no clue about history like yourself get to comment on here.

    • @diedampfbrasse98
      @diedampfbrasse98 3 місяці тому +2

      obviously its just now that you take notice, the MBT development and testing was constant in the past years. We got quiet a number of prototypes coming and going with barely any attention from the public, as there simply wasnt a need in the publics eyes.
      Also seeing russia now even fielding T55s in frontline service tells you everything about the why the west took it slow ... Our enemies development of new MBTs was neither very successful nor productive either, so very little point in wasting billions when minor upgrades of old tank would do.

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 3 місяці тому

      Do you think developing and testing a modern weapon is done in a few months?

  • @timmoore9736
    @timmoore9736 3 місяці тому +1

    In 1969-1970, while serving in the Army in Vietnam, I was talking with one of our pilot officers. He had been in tanks and said that when he found out what a HEAT round did to th inside of a tank, he immediatelys tarted the process of getting out of tanks and into aircraft. They weren't invincible themn, and Ukraine has shown the world how truly vulnerable tanks are. Ukraine has had to find a way of dealing with tanks; one wonders, because most armies are not in a war, how much impact Ukraine's cobbled together defense against tanks is making on the war planners.

  • @russtill403
    @russtill403 3 місяці тому

    i can smell something,think its coming from that field.

  • @necronlord52
    @necronlord52 3 місяці тому

    So, how is it integrated in the network? This is the real question here.

  • @exsappermadman25055
    @exsappermadman25055 3 місяці тому +1

    Russian tanks, they are talking about Russian metal coffins. Calm down ffs...

  • @TheFlyWahine
    @TheFlyWahine 3 місяці тому +1

    Peopel that want a Terminator rts game that allow humans to fight against Legion (the new Skynet in the later movie) because its got a realistic dificulty. And atm its only got realistic extream dificulty.

  • @jrusso9722
    @jrusso9722 3 місяці тому +1

    I have sent ideas to General Dynamics, and The Military. So far, no response.

  • @embreis2257
    @embreis2257 3 місяці тому

    rheinmetall wants to get in on the market. today, the Leo2 is mainly being build by _Krauss Maffei Wegmann_ and rheinmetall provides the gun.
    the Panther most probably won't get government support form Germany. it needs a major foreign buyer for any chance of lift off. so far, none has been forthcoming.

    • @diedampfbrasse98
      @diedampfbrasse98 3 місяці тому

      Rheinmetall is already in the market and they did/do much more then just the gun and FCS btw, especially the multiple L2A4 upgrade contracts heavily rely on Rheinmetall production/armor development even when KMW gets a piece of the contract due to licences. In 2023 those competitors even had a legal argument settled around Rheinmetalls rights to the Leopard 2A4 development. Rheinmetall also did more recently the Leopard 1 refurbishment for Ukraine, the L2A4 ring swap with the slovak republic, they now build the Lynx IFVs and so on. They are by no means newbies to the tank game, but old school development competition and partner to KMW at the same time.
      The Panther is just an answer to KMW having ditched Rheinmetall for future MBT developments and taken Nexter on board.

  • @bulgingbattery2050
    @bulgingbattery2050 3 місяці тому

    Leopard 2A7 FTW!

  • @captjinxmarine9832
    @captjinxmarine9832 3 місяці тому

    We need to stop meeting today’s requirements and beat two decades ahead by setting the requirements.

  • @GodPresidentReagan
    @GodPresidentReagan 3 місяці тому +5

    RUSSIAN TANKS ARE WAY BETTER, OUR TANK TURRETS CAN ALMOST REACH SPACE REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

    • @a5cent
      @a5cent 3 місяці тому

      Russian military planners expect them to soon take over the role of the Russian T-50 AWACS.

    • @anthonynicholich9654
      @anthonynicholich9654 3 місяці тому

      I am Serbian and I strongly support my Slavic Russian brothers but tanks on both German and Russian side were always debatable. Russia could produce more and German tanks were technologically a little bit better I would say.

    • @a5cent
      @a5cent 3 місяці тому +3

      @@anthonynicholich9654 Why not support your Slavic brothers who aren't evil, and didn't invade their neighbor for no reason?

    • @anthonynicholich9654
      @anthonynicholich9654 3 місяці тому

      @@a5cent
      There you go not knowing history and being arrogant again usually people like you are time wasters.

    • @anthonynicholich9654
      @anthonynicholich9654 3 місяці тому

      @@a5cent
      Not gonna waste half of my Sunday afternoon teaching you history. If 19 million dead Russians during WWII is not enough for you for history not to repeat itself yes you are ignorant and arrogant.

  • @doomsayer9195
    @doomsayer9195 3 місяці тому

    emmm tanks should be ran remotely.... there kind of a coffin if you don't have Air Superiority

  • @darrencorrigan8505
    @darrencorrigan8505 3 місяці тому

    Thanks, Military News. The new tank meets qualifications.

  • @BR-hi6yt
    @BR-hi6yt 3 місяці тому +2

    Would it survive an anti-tank missile hit? Unlikely, so what's the point? Likely to be another death trap.

    • @a5cent
      @a5cent 3 місяці тому +2

      Nothing mobile can be built today that can survive an anti-tank missile hit. Just having that expectation is, frankly, brain dead. And yet, armored mobile fire platforms remain essential on the battlefield. So what do you do?
      Anyone can bitch and criticize. The question is how you provide those capabilities in a package that is at least somewhat survivable. The answer provided here is to spot and eliminate that threat before such a missile can be fired (drone operator), or, if all else fails, have the APS neutralize the missile. That is a reasonable approach. I doubt this technology is fully fleshed out and mature, but the process must start somewhere.

  • @necronlord52
    @necronlord52 3 місяці тому +1

    So, what's new here? Is it shooting laser from the main gun? No. Does it have AI instead of a gunner? No also. May be, it can show you priority targets and threat level? Well, no. Crew of 2? Also no. Better drone protection? What are you talking about? May be, it can fly on antigravity? Have a forcefield for protection? Invisible? No, no and no.

  • @MrLibormortis
    @MrLibormortis 3 місяці тому

    Think Ukraine is dying to test out this tank, in the field.

  • @necronlord52
    @necronlord52 3 місяці тому

    I don't see anything new here. No groundbreaking tech, nothing.

  • @cristianemontagner9616
    @cristianemontagner9616 3 місяці тому

    The only thing i hate about this is the giant gap in the turret ring. If something gets past the APS and hits the turret ring, everyone dies.

  • @jonasblahut8084
    @jonasblahut8084 3 місяці тому +4

    These ai title tanks getting too goofy 😭😭

  • @derrickbrann2373
    @derrickbrann2373 3 місяці тому

    This shyte gets worse.

  • @Ju13n1s2e9
    @Ju13n1s2e9 3 місяці тому

    02:17 Is it only me getting chills by the Chinese labels , are machines built in China or China already hacked into the manufacturer and got the drawings ?

    • @GreysAgenda
      @GreysAgenda 3 місяці тому

      the writing is japanese, top right says mechanic. i don't know what the rest says. japanese and chinese kanji are quite similar, japan is using china's kanji and china i borrowed some of the japanese kanji. so yeah, i hope this makes you a little warmer :) have great day!

    • @Ju13n1s2e9
      @Ju13n1s2e9 3 місяці тому

      @@GreysAgenda Ok. I used Google translate that accept image inputs, and for the "commander" and language is set to "automatic", Google translate indicated the text was traditional Chinese.

    • @GreysAgenda
      @GreysAgenda 3 місяці тому

      @@Ju13n1s2e9 hmm strange, 2 of the words was written in hiragana which is Japanese so i just assumed it was Japanese, the my bad if i was a bit misleading. the top right and bottom right are written in hiragana.

  • @necronlord52
    @necronlord52 3 місяці тому

    Hero-120 is an Israel development, not german. Lol.

  • @necronlord52
    @necronlord52 3 місяці тому

    Oh, no! They invented the autoloader!!!

  • @whowhy9023
    @whowhy9023 3 місяці тому

    Certainly hope it’s cheaper.
    The package seems lacking any real advancement.
    Tanks with an actual crew is almost as stupid as jets with pilots.

    • @zero.Identity
      @zero.Identity 3 місяці тому

      you have clearly no idea about warfare or tanks or tactics

  • @polgadototter
    @polgadototter 2 місяці тому

    funny how every american tank catches fire, from the sheridan on to today

  • @tominmtnvw
    @tominmtnvw 3 місяці тому +1

    This is a poorly put together video.

  • @edutaimentcartoys
    @edutaimentcartoys 3 місяці тому

    wow

  • @user-pn3io5oy3i
    @user-pn3io5oy3i 3 місяці тому

    Russia fears... my ass!

  • @anthonynicholich9654
    @anthonynicholich9654 3 місяці тому

    Are German tanks trying to fight Russian tanks again?
    Encircling Berlin in 1945 with two and a half million Russian soldiers and holding Eastern Germany for 45 years was not enough??

    • @Hans2241
      @Hans2241 3 місяці тому +1

      Because Russia is attacking again. 9th war Russia started after the FALL of the Soviet union

  • @mbysto
    @mbysto 3 місяці тому

    bullshit

  • @robertaurens5665
    @robertaurens5665 3 місяці тому

    As Germany has no industrial capacity where is it going to be built?🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Are the Germans going to get the Chinese to manufacture it in plastic?🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣Military news needs to get a life and a real job🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @GodPresidentReagan
      @GodPresidentReagan 3 місяці тому

      Fine german you are with your nazi ussr profile picture. Was denkst du Volksverräter wo die bisherigen deutschen Panzer produziert wurden? Ab nach Russland mit dir, denn hier wirst du scheinbar nicht genug unterdrückt, was deine Vorliebe zu sein scheint.

    • @a5cent
      @a5cent 3 місяці тому

      In Ukraine. The Factory is being setup now and close to completion. Joke is on you. 👆

    • @robertaurens5665
      @robertaurens5665 3 місяці тому

      @@a5centClearly you are drinking Joe's kool-aid and snorting his sugar🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @a5cent
      @a5cent 3 місяці тому

      @@robertaurens5665 I have no idea who Joe is.
      Either way, your excessive use of emojis doesn't make your comments any more authoritative. In only comes across as childish.
      I'd suggest you use Google next time. It can help you, assuming anything can.

    • @robertaurens5665
      @robertaurens5665 3 місяці тому

      @@a5centYou're not exactly bursting with knowledge. Don't you know who is the president of US? Given Ukraine is running backwards as fast as it can and most of Ukraine's industrial infrastructure has been decimated by Russia and given how many different materials, technologies and artisinal skills are required, it's just not possible.

  • @Ehhwas
    @Ehhwas 3 місяці тому

    russia is europe too..partly...

  • @gohumberto
    @gohumberto 3 місяці тому +1

    Stupidity. The war in Ukraine has demonstrated on a daily basis that WW2 tank warfare is dead. It's over. The cold-war vision of 10,000 Russian tanks crossing into Germany, to meet 10,000 NATO tanks is history.
    10,000 Russian tanks would be met by swarms of a million A.I. controlled drones. The battlefield just changed. Would YOU want to be in a tank on a battlefield today? 50 tons of hot, magnetic, steel?? That sounds like just the sort of target an AI drone is looking for.
    The Ukrainians will produce a million drones in 2024. Most of them domestic-sized, disposable, types. But that's 2 for every Russian foot soldier. Trench warfare is dead now.
    When there are thousands of disposable drones swarming overhead do you really want to be cooking your Beans in a freezing trench.
    You can bet your last dollar that every Military on the planet is having a major rethink about where to spend their defence budget.

    • @GodPresidentReagan
      @GodPresidentReagan 3 місяці тому

      limited range on drones makes humans unexpendable with our technology. This wont change til we get WAAAY better batteries, but ai on these would definetly help UA. Which isnt really a thing im too keen on since this will make future wars even scarier and deadlier. Thank you Russia for forcing the west to develop such things...

    • @a5cent
      @a5cent 3 місяці тому +1

      What is actually stupid is this sort of "thinking".
      The last millennia of warfare have demonstrated, on a daily bases, that human soldiers are extremely squishy and have no business participating in warfare. It's over. That vision is history.
      See how ridiculous that sounds. The reason humans aren't taken off the battlefield is the exact same reason tanks won't be either. Tanks will adapt and change, but they aren't going away.

  • @petermellors6456
    @petermellors6456 3 місяці тому

    Unfortunately Tanks, though useful, are a relic of yesterday, the use of Aircraft is the better form of mobile infantry support

  • @niki7040
    @niki7040 3 місяці тому +1

    Germany has always built the best tanks.

    • @anthonynicholich9654
      @anthonynicholich9654 3 місяці тому +1

      Probably but never in numbers enough equal to Russia and United States.

    • @TheGreyAreaBetween
      @TheGreyAreaBetween 3 місяці тому +1

      One common theme I’ve heard is that Germany have a tendency towards over-engineering their tanks. As an air force man I don’t know too much about tanks beyond identifying them from above. I recall stories of panzer divisions in WWII having a lot of issues with breaking down frequently. Utterly formidable compared to allied tanks when they worked, but often a sitting duck after one fault or another. To be honest, that’s about as much as I know about them so I’m sure others have more knowledge and understanding in this area than myself.

    • @anthonynicholich9654
      @anthonynicholich9654 3 місяці тому

      @@TheGreyAreaBetween
      Those people you heard talk meant to say engineered better! Overengineering is a word used by arrogant underskilled people That don't understand something that is engineered above their understanding so they knock it down . I rather have "overengineered" tank then underengineered like the WWII Sherman was making it a coffin.

    • @Honking_Goose
      @Honking_Goose 3 місяці тому

      ???????????? WW2, also just look at the population and GDP of Germany yes if they wanna go wartime can certainly can come close enough to the USA and Russia@@anthonynicholich9654