🌟 Got an idea for my next PS3 vs PS5 comparison? I’d love to hear your suggestions! Drop your ideas in the comments, and I’ll see what I can do 😉. Your likes, shares, and channel support mean the world to me and help make this channel awesome! 🙌 🎉 Support me on Patreon: www.patreon.com/Cycu1 🎮 Join the UA-cam channel: ua-cam.com/channels/D3rfp47a3xZuqHhllcIvIA.htmljoin 🛒 Use my affiliate links to buy games and other stuff on Amazon: amzn.to/3LJq6Vk Thanks for being amazing and helping this community grow! 🚀
If I remember correctly, the remaster was criticised because was based on the console version instead of PC. That's why the critics on PC especially. The Switch port lost lot of details to be honest. But PS3 version seems suffering in FPS.
ps3 more blue/darker, more jagged image, slightly better effects, more dense foliage, crabs at the beginning Switch is orange/brighter, clean image, better framerate, less foliage. no crabs at the beginning
Unfortunately, Crysis Remastered 1, 2, and 3 on Nintendo Switch are riddled with bugs - from the weapons locking up and not firing to, most commonly, audio like your weapon firing or the enemies' weapons firing or the radio chatter will cut out entirely, and stay that way, while the music continues to play. There are no solutions to these bugs. The most effort for the bug squashing was put into the first game, with the second to last patch actually going out without being properly checked and breaking the game even more severely than it is now. Ultimately, after a number of patches, Saber Interactive quietly abandoned all three titles and left them riddled with immersion-breaking and sometimes game-breaking bugs with, clearly, no intention to ever actually finish the job, as it has been almost 2 and a half years since the last patch and complete radio silence from the studio. And note: these are not bugs you *might* bump into. These are bugs that WILL, beyond a doubt, crop up about 10 minutes into your play time and ruin the game for you each and every time you play. If you're looking at this video with an interest in buying the Switch games, I can only implore you to avoid them. Who knows why Saber Interactive abandoned them entirely - maybe the money dried up? Maybe Crytek refused to pay them for any further work on more patches? Whatever the case may be, all three games were rushed jobs that - while the first game seemed to get some extra love and care from the port studio - nonetheless turned into unplayable messes. Gorgeous tech demos, but shoddy products standing on a scaffolding of broken promises, actually immoral to sell in their current state.
@@lucasbobadilla4653pero lo triste es que la nintendo switch muy apenas compite con una consola super antigua como la ps3.. pero aún así me gusta la switch
@@dominicvega9438 he visto juegos que ni a palos correría la ps3 como por ejemplo doom eternal o wolfenstein, también está el the witcher 3, para sar tan pequeña no está mal..
@@lucasbobadilla4653Es una consola regular ni siquiera puede con el GTA V y eso que es un juego del 2013 .. pero por el valor que tiene mejor una Xbox series s .. yo actualmente tengo la oled y pues lo único que no me gusta es que los juegos aveces se ven pixelados cuando juegas en línea pero mejor juego modo historia y en la Xbox series x juego el warzone o fornite
Ciekawe porównanie, wersja na ps3/xbox360 była zrobiona na nowszym silniku, zastosowano również inny filtr kolorów co mi się akurat bardzo podobało, lepszy klimat gra nabrała w nocy. Kuleje framerate na ps3 jak w większości gier z pierwszych jej lat na rynku niestety, co przekłada się na duży plus wersji na Switcha, naprawdę dobrze to chodzi i wygląda, natomiast zauważyłem brak kilku efektów postprocesowych na switchu co widać na początku oraz zupełnie inaczej prezentuje się zamrożony statek, mam wrażenie też że rozdzielczość jest niższa ale zastosowano antyaliasing. Overall switch ogarnia temat lepiej, ale biorąc pod uwagę wiek ps3 wciąż potrafi się obronić kilkoma szczegółami :)
Back when this game got released was the very differencial in graphics wise, as the tech back then didnt even showed the true potential at max graphics, My pc back then was struggling for even doing 30 fps and it was a pc from the year Crysis got released.
Hmm. PS3 based on original version with more performance fixes and switch based on remastered version with more performance fixes)) I think switch is a bit faster than ps3, but crysis in original version is more beautiful at night.
3-4 years ago I saw comparisons of this game on different consoles and the Nintendo Switch was quite disappointing so I didn't buy the game. But when I saw this video, my opinion changed immediately. It looks much better than I've ever seen it. Maybe it's because the graphics have been updated after the port. I remember it used to have broken graphics, messy leaves and less good looking visuals than the PS3.
The performance dropped a lot of the Xbox 360, in fact it was all over the place most of the time, but PS3 was much worse, it was the original platform I played it on and honestly I noticed it was all over the place but I was just so enamoured that a game I thought was impossible on those machines was actually running. Still my favourite of the Crysis games and did eventually get to play the PC exclusive Warhead on my potato PC later down the line to complete the series.
@@hugostiglitzracing866 its disabled in a special file for the games programing on the console version. on the console version you need special software to access this file to re enable it. its disabled for a reason. the console cant handle the game correctly do to hardware limitations.
14:14 in advance is where you can clearly see the vast improvement in the Switch version Just look at the illumination, frame rate, overall image quality is far more appealing in the Switch one.
Não. A versão de PS3 é muito instável, tem quedas de FPS a todo o momento. Joguei em ambas a versões e a do Nitendo Switch e melhor. Claro, é importante levar em consideração que o Nitendo Switch tem um hardware melhor.
The color grading at times did look better on ps3 and 360 but they overdid it on many places. A lot of details were missing due to blown out contrast and colors. So at times it looks better than the pc version and other times it looks like ass.
Literalmente en PS3 además de correr a 15-20 FPS tiene un filtro azúl que solo se ve bien en la noche. En el día se ve horrible el filtro y la gente piensa que se ve mejor gráficamente cuando en realidad es el mismo en ambos casos solo que en Switch no ocupan meter esos trucos de programación para correr crysis, encima de sus 30 FPS estables... Lo siento Sony lovers pero la versión de Switch es superior.
graphics wise the ps3 version looks way much better and more detailed surprisingly, there's more density with more lush environment, the lighting is better too, love how the trees looks with the sunlight striking them in the distance. performance wise the switch version is smoother in comparison.
Me gusta más como se ve en el Switch aunque tenga menos efectos, es más cómodo a la vista, ese filtro azul de ps3 hace que se pierdan detalles y como que molesta
I played the PS3 version recently again and was shocked at how poor it runs 10-20fps most of the time. Also the color is very unrealistic and harsh on the eyes. It's 800x600 stretched resolution with edge blur also looks awful on a 4K TV.
@@osretrogames64Not a mobile game from 2010 but Gameloft's NOVA 3 is what I can think of an FPS mobile game that's close to console quality especially for 2012 standards.
Jajajajajajajaa PS3 no podría correr Doom Eternal, The Witcher 3, MK 11, Ace Combat 7, No Man´s Sky, Hellblade, Dying Light, Kingdom Come Deliverance... Todos esos juegos se meriendan a nivel técnico a TLOU y cualquier cosa de PS3. No seas fanboy.
@@kevinkite3418the graphical power is similar to a ps3 and switch doesn't have all the effects, the newer tech just allows that to be handheld today rather than full console with mains power.
@@carloscuello8814I believe those games could easily work on a ps3 or 360, they could if someone took the time to port them, maybe at lower resolution and frames.
@@thelastofus2872 Isnt just about lowering resolution and fps. Most games i´m mentioning are UE 4 games, ID Tech 7 among other more recent engines. UE 4 isnt compatible with PS360, not even ID Tech 6 isnt aswell....So, for, example, those games would had to be redone on UE 3 or ID Tech 5 to run on PS360, and also lose on the way lotta of the gameplay and graphical features. For example, MK 11 would had to look like MK 9...Doom Eternal would have to look like Rage and run less than 30 fps, loose verticality, have less enemies and of course less detailed....a complete demake, not just a downgraded port, like happens on Switch. So doesnt matter what you believe, is about the facts, and the fact is Switch is above PS3 and 360...In some aspects like GPU and RAM even Wii U was....
Você é um inútil fracassado, o ps3 pra época dele, era muito mais poderoso que esse teu PC aí Processador Cell não foi nem usado 100% Poquer que todo fã de PC vem falar de gráfico? E sempre atrás do Playstation no mercado.
@@amnril around 2011 was when first parties where really delivering extremely polished and great looking games on consoles. Crysis 1 specially doesn't hold up well compared to other titles on console from that year due to the massive downgrades that they did to not overcome the memory restrictions. and the PS3 version suffers with awful CPU optimization and lower available memory compared to the 360 leading to have even further downgrades compared to the 360 version. Crysis 2 on the other hand uses a mix of Medium to Very High settings on both 360 and PS3 and looks excelent even today and is one of the best looking games on both consoles
🌟 Got an idea for my next PS3 vs PS5 comparison? I’d love to hear your suggestions! Drop your ideas in the comments, and I’ll see what I can do 😉.
Your likes, shares, and channel support mean the world to me and help make this channel awesome! 🙌
🎉 Support me on Patreon: www.patreon.com/Cycu1
🎮 Join the UA-cam channel: ua-cam.com/channels/D3rfp47a3xZuqHhllcIvIA.htmljoin
🛒 Use my affiliate links to buy games and other stuff on Amazon: amzn.to/3LJq6Vk
Thanks for being amazing and helping this community grow! 🚀
@@Cycu1 do mgs5
The ps3 version is very playable
Buy Crysis here: amzn.to/3S7xopm
Thanks for using my Amazon Affiliate links!
blue filter on vs blue filter off
and global illumination OFF on Switch
Ur wrong)
Soul vs Soulless
@@thefishman866 that soulless look is the original look of the game btw.
Torch light effect on PS3 actually looks better which was a surprise.
If I remember correctly, the remaster was criticised because was based on the console version instead of PC. That's why the critics on PC especially.
The Switch port lost lot of details to be honest. But PS3 version seems suffering in FPS.
The 'missing' PC features were reimplemented on SX/PS5 and PS5.
@@overwatch761 Nah, they were "ducktaped". The original is the only way to play Crysis. Not to mention the huge amount of mods
its because the PC version were based on a very old CryEngine 2 (from 2006) which does not even support multi-core CPU
I really wonder why did a handheld version lose a bunch of details compared to the PC version. Surely it cannot be due to it being...well, handheld.
ps3 more blue/darker, more jagged image, slightly better effects, more dense foliage, crabs at the beginning
Switch is orange/brighter, clean image, better framerate, less foliage. no crabs at the beginning
There’s nothing in the os3 version that’s better 😂😂😂
Cool.
I remember the monochrome era of videogames. Everything was brown or blue lol
*Визуально Ps3 версия выглядит интереснее...*
вообще нет, еще и этот блевотный синий фильтр
Unfortunately, Crysis Remastered 1, 2, and 3 on Nintendo Switch are riddled with bugs - from the weapons locking up and not firing to, most commonly, audio like your weapon firing or the enemies' weapons firing or the radio chatter will cut out entirely, and stay that way, while the music continues to play. There are no solutions to these bugs. The most effort for the bug squashing was put into the first game, with the second to last patch actually going out without being properly checked and breaking the game even more severely than it is now. Ultimately, after a number of patches, Saber Interactive quietly abandoned all three titles and left them riddled with immersion-breaking and sometimes game-breaking bugs with, clearly, no intention to ever actually finish the job, as it has been almost 2 and a half years since the last patch and complete radio silence from the studio. And note: these are not bugs you *might* bump into. These are bugs that WILL, beyond a doubt, crop up about 10 minutes into your play time and ruin the game for you each and every time you play. If you're looking at this video with an interest in buying the Switch games, I can only implore you to avoid them. Who knows why Saber Interactive abandoned them entirely - maybe the money dried up? Maybe Crytek refused to pay them for any further work on more patches? Whatever the case may be, all three games were rushed jobs that - while the first game seemed to get some extra love and care from the port studio - nonetheless turned into unplayable messes. Gorgeous tech demos, but shoddy products standing on a scaffolding of broken promises, actually immoral to sell in their current state.
I finished all 3 crysis on switch and its fine.
@@truthtruth9056 me too
Better on the Nintendo switch.
Lo triste es que una consola como la nintendo switch tiene muy poca calidad .. pero aún así me gusta
@@dominicvega9438 cambiaria calidad por potencia je igual se ve bien y mejor que la ps3 es más nueva y portátil aunque ps3 se la banca bien...
@@lucasbobadilla4653pero lo triste es que la nintendo switch muy apenas compite con una consola super antigua como la ps3.. pero aún así me gusta la switch
@@dominicvega9438 he visto juegos que ni a palos correría la ps3 como por ejemplo doom eternal o wolfenstein, también está el the witcher 3, para sar tan pequeña no está mal..
@@lucasbobadilla4653Es una consola regular ni siquiera puede con el GTA V y eso que es un juego del 2013 .. pero por el valor que tiene mejor una Xbox series s .. yo actualmente tengo la oled y pues lo único que no me gusta es que los juegos aveces se ven pixelados cuando juegas en línea pero mejor juego modo historia y en la Xbox series x juego el warzone o fornite
this should be called "reimagined". It's the same game done very diferently, not a remaster.
Ciekawe porównanie, wersja na ps3/xbox360 była zrobiona na nowszym silniku, zastosowano również inny filtr kolorów co mi się akurat bardzo podobało, lepszy klimat gra nabrała w nocy.
Kuleje framerate na ps3 jak w większości gier z pierwszych jej lat na rynku niestety, co przekłada się na duży plus wersji na Switcha, naprawdę dobrze to chodzi i wygląda, natomiast zauważyłem brak kilku efektów postprocesowych na switchu co widać na początku oraz zupełnie inaczej prezentuje się zamrożony statek, mam wrażenie też że rozdzielczość jest niższa ale zastosowano antyaliasing. Overall switch ogarnia temat lepiej, ale biorąc pod uwagę wiek ps3 wciąż potrafi się obronić kilkoma szczegółami :)
Ps3 😊
Sim, a versão do PS3 e pior.
@@Oful4noooooo Se é o que gostas ok 😅
Back when this game got released was the very differencial in graphics wise, as the tech back then didnt even showed the true potential at max graphics, My pc back then was struggling for even doing 30 fps and it was a pc from the year Crysis got released.
its impressive that this eater of PC's can now run on a itty bitty cutie patootie nintendo switch
what a time to be alive
Yeah it’s crazy i remember when i was younger this was the benchmark series. You were lucky if you had a pc that ran this.
Hmm. PS3 based on original version with more performance fixes and switch based on remastered version with more performance fixes)) I think switch is a bit faster than ps3, but crysis in original version is more beautiful at night.
3-4 years ago I saw comparisons of this game on different consoles and the Nintendo Switch was quite disappointing so I didn't buy the game. But when I saw this video, my opinion changed immediately. It looks much better than I've ever seen it. Maybe it's because the graphics have been updated after the port. I remember it used to have broken graphics, messy leaves and less good looking visuals than the PS3.
The PS3 one was based on the PC release wchich looks better to me than the new one on Switch.
Switch release was also based around the recent PC release too with cut down effects
Not bad for an Nintendo Switch. I played the Xbox 360 Version cant remember slow downs or Frame Drops. Seams to be an PS3 thing.
The performance dropped a lot of the Xbox 360, in fact it was all over the place most of the time, but PS3 was much worse, it was the original platform I played it on and honestly I noticed it was all over the place but I was just so enamoured that a game I thought was impossible on those machines was actually running. Still my favourite of the Crysis games and did eventually get to play the PC exclusive Warhead on my potato PC later down the line to complete the series.
Some settings were dialed back for the Switch, resulting in a smoother framerate.
Switch version > PS3 version
What settings? I don't see any that are lower and the image quality is a lot better
@@hugostiglitzracing866 its disabled in a special file for the games programing on the console version. on the console version you need special software to access this file to re enable it. its disabled for a reason. the console cant handle the game correctly do to hardware limitations.
14:14 in advance is where you can clearly see the vast improvement in the Switch version
Just look at the illumination, frame rate, overall image quality is far more appealing in the Switch one.
2020
Remember when THIS was future?
I find it weird that in the PS3 version, the SCAR has a ring sight. Any other version have that?
Dobra robota synku mój Waldusiu. ;)
Both versions até great for The hardware
Não.
A versão de PS3 é muito instável, tem quedas de FPS a todo o momento.
Joguei em ambas a versões e a do Nitendo Switch e melhor.
Claro, é importante levar em consideração que o Nitendo Switch tem um hardware melhor.
The worst thing about the PS360 version was that blue filter. Who's idea was that? 🙃 Lowered details were less a problem.
Blue & Brown filter PS3/360 era.
@@NaldzHobbySide RE4 "inspired" all brown filter games
AC iirc "inspired" all blue ones
Cryengine 3 vs cryengine 3 by saber interactive
The color grading at times did look better on ps3 and 360 but they overdid it on many places. A lot of details were missing due to blown out contrast and colors. So at times it looks better than the pc version and other times it looks like ass.
Literalmente en PS3 además de correr a 15-20 FPS tiene un filtro azúl que solo se ve bien en la noche.
En el día se ve horrible el filtro y la gente piensa que se ve mejor gráficamente cuando en realidad es el mismo en ambos casos solo que en Switch no ocupan meter esos trucos de programación para correr crysis, encima de sus 30 FPS estables... Lo siento Sony lovers pero la versión de Switch es superior.
Swtch best
He jugado ambos y la verdad me quedo con PS3, es mas estable y mas comodo que la Swich
¿Más estable? Va literalmente a 15-20 fps
Jajaja no, estable no es, corre mejor en Switch.
graphics wise the ps3 version looks way much better and more detailed surprisingly, there's more density with more lush environment, the lighting is better too, love how the trees looks with the sunlight striking them in the distance.
performance wise the switch version is smoother in comparison.
Me gusta más como se ve en el Switch aunque tenga menos efectos, es más cómodo a la vista, ese filtro azul de ps3 hace que se pierdan detalles y como que molesta
Literal
But the switch version wasn’t a update they say bulllllllll shit
I played the PS3 version recently again and was shocked at how poor it runs 10-20fps most of the time. Also the color is very unrealistic and harsh on the eyes. It's 800x600 stretched resolution with edge blur also looks awful on a 4K TV.
Play 3 tiene mucho contraste pero creo que no es culpa de la consola si no de configuración del monitor .
Usa capturadora, no influye monitor
@@rogermarcapizarroso4353 ok
PS3 version really look better (in the end of video specially).
Talvez você seja cego e precise ir a um oftalmologista.
A versão de PS3 está completamente borrada e com FPS abaixo de 20FPS.
It does at the end
My God, PLAYSTATION 3 vs switch hahaahajajaj
You know the Switch wins in a comparison to PS3 in power
@@crestofhonor2349 of course he wins man hahaahah, we're talking about PLAYSTATION 3 from 2006
That comparsion is ridiculous, of course switch would win
@@Diogo5245try playing on the toilet with a PS5 or without electricity, portable system 😅😅😅😅😅tard
The Switch version looks like a mobile game from 2010.
I wanted to know which mobile game in the middle of 2010 looked like this. 😂 Because I want to play it.
@@osretrogames64Not a mobile game from 2010 but Gameloft's NOVA 3 is what I can think of an FPS mobile game that's close to console quality especially for 2012 standards.
@@JemZardagree, but if you pay more attention to the graphs, you will notice.
@@JemZardIf console quality means Wii or PS2 quality, sure.
Ps3 much better!
es increible como una consola del 2006 tiene mejor potencia grafica que una que salio en el 2017.
¿Mejor potencia? Hay que ser ciego o un ignorante para decir eso.
Take a look at the Switch version of Red Dead Redemption compared to the ps3 one, there's no way a 2006 console can be stronger than a 2017 one.
Se ve mas real en swith
la de switch se ve mejor
pero, era necesario quitarle la escencia en esta parte? 14:24
На ps3 эффекты лучше👍. Но на свиче текстуры в некоторых локация лучше
на пс3 есть глобальное освещение
Nintendo switch, pou.
switch v2 lux like pc version😆
У Ps3 версии больше эффектов разных,свет,лед,освящение,тени,а версия Switch в этом плане порезана очень сильно
Gamma,contrast, brightness.
Esse jogo roda abaixo de 20 FPS no PS3.
A versão do Nitendo Switch e melhor.
O game roda a 30 fps no Playstation 3.
Ps3 version, instead of the lowest fps rate, wins by far
despite
"wins by far" LOL 😂😂😂
What a downgrade
More resolution is a downgrade?
Switch is a ps3 portable
Куда потрачены деньги? версия ps 3 в 10 раз круче той, что справа
Deviam proibir usar a palavra Remaster no Switch, ao menos de jogos de terceiros.
Ps3 💪
d noche ps3 d día nitendozzz
Se supone que la switch es mas potente y pasa de un filtro azul a uno gris y sin tanto detalle, mejor en ps3
Ps3 tiene mas potencia que el switch un the last of us en una switch la quema
Jajajajajajajaa PS3 no podría correr Doom Eternal, The Witcher 3, MK 11, Ace Combat 7, No Man´s Sky, Hellblade, Dying Light, Kingdom Come Deliverance... Todos esos juegos se meriendan a nivel técnico a TLOU y cualquier cosa de PS3. No seas fanboy.
This is a really stupid commentary. Nintendo Switch is 10+ years newer than PS3. It has way more advanced tech than PS3.
@@kevinkite3418the graphical power is similar to a ps3 and switch doesn't have all the effects, the newer tech just allows that to be handheld today rather than full console with mains power.
@@carloscuello8814I believe those games could easily work on a ps3 or 360, they could if someone took the time to port them, maybe at lower resolution and frames.
@@thelastofus2872 Isnt just about lowering resolution and fps. Most games i´m mentioning are UE 4 games, ID Tech 7 among other more recent engines. UE 4 isnt compatible with PS360, not even ID Tech 6 isnt aswell....So, for, example, those games would had to be redone on UE 3 or ID Tech 5 to run on PS360, and also lose on the way lotta of the gameplay and graphical features. For example, MK 11 would had to look like MK 9...Doom Eternal would have to look like Rage and run less than 30 fps, loose verticality, have less enemies and of course less detailed....a complete demake, not just a downgraded port, like happens on Switch. So doesnt matter what you believe, is about the facts, and the fact is Switch is above PS3 and 360...In some aspects like GPU and RAM even Wii U was....
PS3 version is better.
PS3 is better 😂
Yeah, 15 fps are better than 30 fps definitely
ps3 win
both versions look like garbage. I can't believe this game is from 2007 - still looks amazing on PC
Você é um inútil fracassado, o ps3 pra época dele, era muito mais poderoso que esse teu PC aí
Processador Cell não foi nem usado 100%
Poquer que todo fã de PC vem falar de gráfico? E sempre atrás do Playstation no mercado.
Lego Star Wars 3 Clone Wars looks the best on a high end HDR PC for real
For the time of release, PS3 version looks perfectly ok which is the key point.
@@amnril around 2011 was when first parties where really delivering extremely polished and great looking games on consoles. Crysis 1 specially doesn't hold up well compared to other titles on console from that year due to the massive downgrades that they did to not overcome the memory restrictions. and the PS3 version suffers with awful CPU optimization and lower available memory compared to the 360 leading to have even further downgrades compared to the 360 version.
Crysis 2 on the other hand uses a mix of Medium to Very High settings on both 360 and PS3 and looks excelent even today and is one of the best looking games on both consoles
Comparing pc to ps3 back then consoles kept up with pc nowadays there are so many changeable parts on pc that makes it unfair
So basically nintendo switch can't run crysis
It's running it much better than the 360 or PS3 ran this game
you"re blind or what lol
What? If that makes sense in your head, I don't want to know what else you're thinking about 😂
Switch>>>>>>ps3
Booth looks shit...
Gaytendo Shit
PS3 está todo azul sem cor
Muito feio
Switch wins
ASUS ROG ALLY X sw!tch_killer