Quicksync using the Arc GPUs is definitely a big win for an AMD build. One of my machines is a 5600X and A380 and I found out quicksync worked perfectly with it. The A380 is also a great Plex server GPU as well.
This has been a great change for me, Thank You! Upgraded the 2070 super in my 3950x system to an A770. Big improvement working with 422 10bit and AE. Better pairing with my macbook m3 pro and I'll be able to keep this workstation going for another couple of years.
I have a 3950x and an RTX 2060 KO Ultra. Thinking of swapping out for an ARC A770. Will the improvement be obvious? I don't have any trouble with 4K h.264 but I almost exclusively use After Effects. I never use Premiere Pro. That much different for AE?
I am planning to build a pc with Arc A770 for freelance video editing. I will mostly use Premiere Pro, After Effects and sometime Blender. So can you tell me which one will perform better in video editing gunnir or limited edition when LE have more bandwidth (560gbps vs 512gbps) and Gunnir have higher clock speed and better cooling system. I heard LE has heating problem. Is it solved now or does it still have a heating issue? If you tested those cards recently for video editing then let me know which one performs better in real-life video editing.
I just built a 7900x with proart the other day you can get a wicked undervolt going on the 7900x drop those temps and watts & maintain 5.3ghz all core avg near 80-82 celcius (I have an old evga 280mm clc aio cooling it and it works great) Optimum Tech has a great little video on how to undervolt the 7900x. Extremely simple.
Any plans to test any of the EYPC 4004 chips? The 65W 12c24t 4464p seems like a great entry level option for a creator but aside from ECC ram I don't know what else it provides over a 7900X or a 9900X moving forward
You are paying a premium for the server grade certification according to Wendell from Level1Techs. Big difference is all the motherboards support ECC as standard, but also support Ryzen 9 cpu's. Consumer boards don't necessarily support ECC memory. You don't get extra PCIe lanes as with the other Epyc cpu's. Perhaps check out their video on it.
Ryzen 9000 just around the corner and battlemage is gonna be insane I think we are going to have a lot of things to see this year and next year. I hope you can do a comparison between all The ProArt 16 laptops with the new one and see the pro's and con's in every one of them. Love the channel as always🤩🤩🤩
Thing is we don't really know bout either the Ryzen 9000 performance or the Battlemage performance. Now I personally believe that Ryzen 9000 will have very good performance even though some was frustrated when AMD said that no, the basic 9000 series processors will not beat the 7000X3D processors when it comes to games. They also said that the performance difference wouldn't be as big as you might think while the 9000X3D would be improved a lot. So while I think the 9000 series CPU's will be good I say we have to wait until 3rd party tests has been done and publicized. Before that we just know it will be faster, but not by how much. Also keep in mind that AMD has been lying on some of the benchmark results they have published. That's not a guess but the unfortunate truth. Battlemage is in the same state. We were promised a lot when Alchemist was to be released. Yet they turned out to be problematic both in drivers and as far as basic performance. When Intel said they would join the discrete GPU market I said the drivers will be crap when released, and I was right. I also said that Druid, possibly Celestial was when they could possibly put some press on AMD and Nvidia. Intel did however surprise me with their driver development. They went from total crap drivers to pretty good in about a year. This should continue with Battlemage. Thing is AMD and Nvidia have decades of work on the drivers to lean on while Intel had to start from pretty close to scratch. One thing that showed that they had less than perfect understanding of the users habits was that Intel underestimated the importance of DX9, DX10 and DX11 and chose to put all effort into DX12. This made the ARC GPU's very bad at handling older games and modern games that used the older versions of DirectX. They eventually used a Linux project to handle the older DX techniques and ported it to Windows and used it to replace their own drivers for the old DX versions and it improved both compatibility and performance a lot compared to their own effort. Now all of this has already been done for Alchemist so it give them a working base for the drivers for Battlemage. Drivers should only get better from this, and perhaps the improved knowledge have helped them design Battlemage to be a lot better match to the market than Alchemist were at release. So feel free to have hope for Battlemage, but be prepared that it might turn out to have some irritating problems, and the performance is one of these. I would be very happy if they turned out to match all hype, especially if the prices are kept decent. It would provide competition that both AMD and Nvidia need. There was a time not to long ago when we had more than five different GPU manufacturers that competed. Unfortunately most of these either was bought up or they completely abandoned the 3D market like Matrox did. Matrox is still around but they only make cards used for professional applications and almost only support very simple 3D functions if any at all.
The AiO with SSD cooling makes a lot of sense once gen5 SSD's becomes popular. So strange they didn't keep it available for those that want to avoid those ultra small active fan and bulky cooled gen5 SSD's. and the problem is that the m.2 slot is often placed right above the GPU slot on many boards. So they will have a hard time in that spot to keep the SSD cool enough not to throttle.The 990Evo is a "cheat". its only 2X in gen5 mode so it is basically just a regular gen4 drive. It's ok after they lowered the price but it is just a "decent" gen4 perf. at 4-5k as a good gen5 is up to 12-15k, but also seriously need some heavy cooling,
Will Arc A770 be as beneficial in Davinci Resolve / Fusion? I've heard Davinci needs lots of VRAM so will A770 with its 16 Gb be a better choice for video editing rather than RTX4060 or 3060/12 Gb?
Can you do a series of tests with AMD APUs (5600G / 5700G / 8XXXG series ) or the 7XXX series + ARC GPUs to just to see how well Quicksync would work with them?
Can you use a different dedicated GPU like a 4080 super as primary and a arc gpu as a secondary with your monitors plugged into the nvidia gpu and still get quicksync from the arc? With the intel instability issues I don't want to go go with an intel platform for my cpu but I still want quicksync so if I can just add a secondary intel gpu to get it that would be amazing.
What about R5 7600x + ARC? Are going to freeze frames and timeline? Also, the SSD 7k speed, isnt supposed to read and write on 7 gigs of speed instead of 300mb?
I use Isopropyl Alcohol 99.9%, it's quite cheap and is non-conductive.. Though I always dry it off first.. When I do repairs on phones, Tablets, laptops & motherboards, it's great for cleaning liquid damage, just soak the PCB and clean it with cotton buds..
I use 99% isopropyl alcohol (nearly pure compared to 99.9% true pure) simply because I bought it in bulk cheaper. I use it to clean everything though and reconstitute some to 70% solution for surface cleaning. A small air blower helps too, or canned air... a good tootbrush (q-tips for some people, I don't like those as much personally).
Looking at the Intel website they claim that adding an ARC 580 to a PC with a Intel CPU capable of Quicksync will improve the Quicksync performance by 40%. So adding a Alchemist GPU to an Intel computer could still improve Quicksync performance. It would be interesting to see if adding two Alchemist GPU's would improve performance even more.
@@blahorgaslisk7763 No, it won't. Dual engines of any Alchemist card are enough and better than any iGPU from CPUs. It will help only during export (Hyper-Encode), but not during the editing process. It also depends which video editing app you are using, but in general AMD and NVIDIA GPUs have more horsepower from Intel GPUs. You need Quicksync though for HW acceleration of decoding videos during editing. I recommend to get both GPUs (AMD or NVIDIA) and combine it with the cheapest ARC (A380) to get advantage of the dual-media-engine Quicksync.
So, given I'm not playing Adobe's silly games, does this work with DaVinci Resolve? If I decide to build a new AM5 PC for Resolve, maybe I should use my A770 instead of my 7900XTX, which is currently used for gaming.
is it beneficial to use 2x intel a770's at the same time? I've seen videos online where people use 2 gpu's at the same time for rendering .. my next question is, my cpu is a ryzen 5950x, i have a am4 platform, im using a b550 motherboard now, so, if 2x intel a770 can be used, what motherboard should i get to support 2 gpus.. also, i should let you know that my main use for this pc is rendering videos for youtube at 4k
none, there is no motherboard supporting multi gpu for intel amd multi gpu is dead nvidia only supports it on the xx90 cards since i think, ampere (and the workstation cards) dont think about multi-gpu before you NEED more than a single 4090 theres a reason multi-gpu on consumer platforms is essentially dead.
@@rahulkamath6984 Now that is an interesting question. I don't see this to be a problem for the Alchemist card, but I'm less sure about the Nvidia card. Now not all motherboards share the direct PCIe lanes between the slots like that, so that's the first thing to check. If there is a PCIe slot that the Alchemist card would fit in that is connected to the motherboard chipset instead of directly to the CPU then the would be no problem. I guess that you have a AMD processor here as from what I know Intel based motherboards always share the 16 PCIe lanes from the CPU for the first x16 lanes slot and the fast M.2 connector. Not sure how they handle a second PCIe x16 slot. Now if it results in a split into two x8 lanes slots then this might be enough to show some performance difference for the 4090, but as far as I know it wont be a total catastrophe. More like a very small performance drop in some certain cases. Using it for calculations or AI work might cause more dependence on the PCIe speed. Frankly I do not know for sure either way. I hope others have done more testing and knows more.
I would put my Aerith statue on it... she would be very dizzy after a while. Its a nice case but I'm not an rgb fan but you could always change it to a white colour
If you were using an AMD CPU w/ a Nvidia GPU for a Creator/AI/ML focused PC and wanted quicksync could you just drop in an Intel A310 Low Profile for that? Yes, it's $100 USD & has only 4 Gigs of ram but if it'd handle the transcoding that the Nvidia card didn't would it possibly be worth it?
The low profile A380 is only 20-50 usd more... so unless your budget is super tight I'd invest in the higher stream processors and VRAM but the A310 is very viable too, if you can get it for much cheaper where you live, it might be the move.
Yes you can easily in Resolve Studio in the settings, but for games it's a bit tricky, since you need to change the monitor display cables each time to the RTX to game (and recognize it), in case the video editing app you use prefers the same behavior as it happens in games. I edit with RTX, but use ARC for encoding/decoding in the timeline and/or export (rendering). Place RTX in PCI-E 1 and the ARC in next PCI-E slot (both will run in PCI 3 or 4/x8). You can also place the ARC in the last "slow" PCI-E 3 port (Gen 3/4 x4) for Quicksync and/or rendering without losing any performance, that's how I have it. This specific setup works flawlessly in Resolve Studio, after setting up them correctly in the settings tab.
@@GeryRevandra Exactly. I am doing that over a year now in Resolve Studio without any problems, which allows you to choose what card does what. The FREE version supports only one GPU and renders only without HW acceleration, so you need the paid version. I am not sure if the other video editing apps allow such flexibility, you have to test on your own. In few word, with the RTX 30 series GPU, CUDA does everything, apart from decoding in timeline/encoding during export (set it in settings for both cards). Actually bought the A380 (or any other ARC, all have the same dual media engines) for the AV1 support which is present only in RTX 40 & RX 7000 series.
@@GeryRevandra It's a great GPU considering its price and the generous 16GB VRAM. It packs a punch in AI and Video apps for sure, but in games it underperforms. If you use AI apps of any kind (even Audacity to generate music via OpenVIVO) and do video-editing/encoding work, you will be very impressed. God bless you bro
Thanks for share, I want to buy new pc for adobe lightroom, primer pro encoding. I know people say buy i9 ultra 285k with nvidia rtx 4070 süper. But I'm looking to use less electricity bill per month. This is my idea is it work. Amd ryzen 7 9700x or 9900x with intel arc 770 . Just is work A.I Adobe Firefly🤔🤔🤔 thanks for writing😊
hi i am having request for you , i am planing to start physics tutorials for my school . it is only based on screen recording with bandicam software , slides from power point . i am planing to edit it with Davinci resolve free version, only using very slight effects like time-bar , popup text .. . only in FHD export and recording . my budget plan is to build pc with 5600g ( no dedicated gpu ) . or with 5600g + gtx 1650 . is it okay or do you recommend any spec for this kind work . please replay .
I'd get a ryzen 5500 with a dedicated card of your choice if this is the route you are going... 5500 is just a 5600g without the igpu and have been 40-ish usd cheaper recently (84 right now compared to 114 for the 5500GT... which is a downclocked version of the 5600G, which is over 120 I believe). Edit: 5600GT is 105 at best buy apparently, that's also very viable
@@radar1437 if you are editing in 1080p than the best 6GB VRAM gpu you can get (1650 or 1660 ti would be fine... I don't know how the low end gpu market is right now so I can't give price/perf advice), if you are doing 4k then the best 8gb+ (used 1070 or 1070ti, which is what I personally think I'd get to pair with a 5500 today but there are a lotbof options).
@@SpoonHurler what do you think of this setup - CPU : 5500 GPU : 1650 AMP . RAM : 16GB / 3600Mhz SSD : crucial P3 ( 526gb) MOBO : MSI - B450 A but what i am confused with what PSU watt to used . 450W or 550W .[ note : iam not planning to upgrade any of these parts in future , may be ram ] online PSU calculator suggest 450w but some reddit post say 550W .
@@radar1437 that looks great, I personally go overkill for PSUs so I would lean 550W simply because good quality ones aren't much more expensive and that's the one place we don't want to completely cheap out on, cause 10 bucks isn't worth the risk of a house fire. MSI Mag BRN or the Apevia 600W that's around 50 bucks are good options
Quicksync using the Arc GPUs is definitely a big win for an AMD build. One of my machines is a 5600X and A380 and I found out quicksync worked perfectly with it. The A380 is also a great Plex server GPU as well.
Absolutely 💯
Man I'm liking the sound of this!
What software and workflow you use?
what mobo are you using for the 5600x???
@@blessyo4 I'm not using an A380 but I have a 5600x PC with a MSI Mag X570 Tomahawk WiFi in it. 4070 GPU.
This has been a great change for me, Thank You! Upgraded the 2070 super in my 3950x system to an A770. Big improvement working with 422 10bit and AE. Better pairing with my macbook m3 pro and I'll be able to keep this workstation going for another couple of years.
I have a 3950x and an RTX 2060 KO Ultra. Thinking of swapping out for an ARC A770. Will the improvement be obvious? I don't have any trouble with 4K h.264 but I almost exclusively use After Effects. I never use Premiere Pro. That much different for AE?
really enjoyed the new intro
Glad you like it
Thank you Lauri.
I am planning to build a pc with Arc A770 for freelance video editing. I will mostly use Premiere Pro, After Effects and sometime Blender. So can you tell me which one will perform better in video editing gunnir or limited edition when LE have more bandwidth (560gbps vs 512gbps) and Gunnir have higher clock speed and better cooling system. I heard LE has heating problem. Is it solved now or does it still have a heating issue? If you tested those cards recently for video editing then let me know which one performs better in real-life video editing.
I love that MoBo. Used it in my build. 🔥🔥🔥👌🏼
Would say the b650 steel legend is a better bang for buck if i should build. 2 8pin on the cpu and pci-e 5 x16
I just built a 7900x with proart the other day you can get a wicked undervolt going on the 7900x drop those temps and watts & maintain 5.3ghz all core avg near 80-82 celcius (I have an old evga 280mm clc aio cooling it and it works great) Optimum Tech has a great little video on how to undervolt the 7900x. Extremely simple.
i bought 7900.. just air cooling at 50-55c iddle.. dead silent.. but at 3.7ghz - 4.4ghz.
I LOL at one of your last comments about the Apple M3 laptop, you said:”16 gb of storage and 512gb of RAM” Blessings! Great video!
DAMN! THE INTRO 🔥🔥🔥
:)
Any plans to test any of the EYPC 4004 chips? The 65W 12c24t 4464p seems like a great entry level option for a creator but aside from ECC ram I don't know what else it provides over a 7900X or a 9900X moving forward
You are paying a premium for the server grade certification according to Wendell from Level1Techs.
Big difference is all the motherboards support ECC as standard, but also support Ryzen 9 cpu's. Consumer boards don't necessarily support ECC memory. You don't get extra PCIe lanes as with the other Epyc cpu's.
Perhaps check out their video on it.
Eagerly awaiting for Snapdragon X Elite review! Anything soon?
🤞
Ryzen 9000 just around the corner and battlemage is gonna be insane I think we are going to have a lot of things to see this year and next year.
I hope you can do a comparison between all The ProArt 16 laptops with the new one and see the pro's and con's in every one of them.
Love the channel as always🤩🤩🤩
Thing is we don't really know bout either the Ryzen 9000 performance or the Battlemage performance. Now I personally believe that Ryzen 9000 will have very good performance even though some was frustrated when AMD said that no, the basic 9000 series processors will not beat the 7000X3D processors when it comes to games. They also said that the performance difference wouldn't be as big as you might think while the 9000X3D would be improved a lot. So while I think the 9000 series CPU's will be good I say we have to wait until 3rd party tests has been done and publicized. Before that we just know it will be faster, but not by how much. Also keep in mind that AMD has been lying on some of the benchmark results they have published. That's not a guess but the unfortunate truth.
Battlemage is in the same state. We were promised a lot when Alchemist was to be released. Yet they turned out to be problematic both in drivers and as far as basic performance.
When Intel said they would join the discrete GPU market I said the drivers will be crap when released, and I was right. I also said that Druid, possibly Celestial was when they could possibly put some press on AMD and Nvidia. Intel did however surprise me with their driver development. They went from total crap drivers to pretty good in about a year. This should continue with Battlemage. Thing is AMD and Nvidia have decades of work on the drivers to lean on while Intel had to start from pretty close to scratch. One thing that showed that they had less than perfect understanding of the users habits was that Intel underestimated the importance of DX9, DX10 and DX11 and chose to put all effort into DX12. This made the ARC GPU's very bad at handling older games and modern games that used the older versions of DirectX. They eventually used a Linux project to handle the older DX techniques and ported it to Windows and used it to replace their own drivers for the old DX versions and it improved both compatibility and performance a lot compared to their own effort.
Now all of this has already been done for Alchemist so it give them a working base for the drivers for Battlemage. Drivers should only get better from this, and perhaps the improved knowledge have helped them design Battlemage to be a lot better match to the market than Alchemist were at release.
So feel free to have hope for Battlemage, but be prepared that it might turn out to have some irritating problems, and the performance is one of these. I would be very happy if they turned out to match all hype, especially if the prices are kept decent. It would provide competition that both AMD and Nvidia need. There was a time not to long ago when we had more than five different GPU manufacturers that competed. Unfortunately most of these either was bought up or they completely abandoned the 3D market like Matrox did. Matrox is still around but they only make cards used for professional applications and almost only support very simple 3D functions if any at all.
This build looks awesome.
:)
The AiO with SSD cooling makes a lot of sense once gen5 SSD's becomes popular. So strange they didn't keep it available for those that want to avoid those ultra small active fan and bulky cooled gen5 SSD's. and the problem is that the m.2 slot is often placed right above the GPU slot on many boards. So they will have a hard time in that spot to keep the SSD cool enough not to throttle.The 990Evo is a "cheat". its only 2X in gen5 mode so it is basically just a regular gen4 drive. It's ok after they lowered the price but it is just a "decent" gen4 perf. at 4-5k as a good gen5 is up to 12-15k, but also seriously need some heavy cooling,
Will Arc A770 be as beneficial in Davinci Resolve / Fusion? I've heard Davinci needs lots of VRAM so will A770 with its 16 Gb be a better choice for video editing rather than RTX4060 or 3060/12 Gb?
I'd put my grammy award in there 😂 especialy if the pc is the one I used to make the music.
😂
Can you do a series of tests with AMD APUs (5600G / 5700G / 8XXXG series ) or the 7XXX series + ARC GPUs to just to see how well Quicksync would work with them?
Can you use a different dedicated GPU like a 4080 super as primary and a arc gpu as a secondary with your monitors plugged into the nvidia gpu and still get quicksync from the arc? With the intel instability issues I don't want to go go with an intel platform for my cpu but I still want quicksync so if I can just add a secondary intel gpu to get it that would be amazing.
I think it would work.
it works perfecly fine , you can go and see the threadripper build on his channel
What about R5 7600x + ARC? Are going to freeze frames and timeline? Also, the SSD 7k speed, isnt supposed to read and write on 7 gigs of speed instead of 300mb?
@theTechNotice what is the liquid you used for cleaning cpu and aio?
I use Isopropyl Alcohol 99.9%, it's quite cheap and is non-conductive.. Though I always dry it off first..
When I do repairs on phones, Tablets, laptops & motherboards, it's great for cleaning liquid damage, just soak the PCB and clean it with cotton buds..
I use 99% isopropyl alcohol (nearly pure compared to 99.9% true pure) simply because I bought it in bulk cheaper. I use it to clean everything though and reconstitute some to 70% solution for surface cleaning.
A small air blower helps too, or canned air... a good tootbrush (q-tips for some people, I don't like those as much personally).
99.9% alcohol. Get some from amazon :)
Everything except 5.25 inch bay Case design, yes still need optical media from time to time. Fortunately we have external usb ones.
i think the usb ones are now preferree
@@asutora.5363 servers often still have them built in usually slim line ones.
How about i5 13600k+ RX 7700XT GPU for 4k video editing?
After watching the video on the "best GPU for creators," I also think that AMD GPUs are more value for money for video editors.
I would get the RX 7800XT for the extra VRAM that is crucial nowdays in video editing, 12GB is low for UHD projects imho.
Looking at the Intel website they claim that adding an ARC 580 to a PC with a Intel CPU capable of Quicksync will improve the Quicksync performance by 40%. So adding a Alchemist GPU to an Intel computer could still improve Quicksync performance. It would be interesting to see if adding two Alchemist GPU's would improve performance even more.
@@blahorgaslisk7763 No, it won't. Dual engines of any Alchemist card are enough and better than any iGPU from CPUs. It will help only during export (Hyper-Encode), but not during the editing process. It also depends which video editing app you are using, but in general AMD and NVIDIA GPUs have more horsepower from Intel GPUs. You need Quicksync though for HW acceleration of decoding videos during editing. I recommend to get both GPUs (AMD or NVIDIA) and combine it with the cheapest ARC (A380) to get advantage of the dual-media-engine Quicksync.
i also think i5 136chilipi is good for editing
I love Cougar 😅
Thank god you didn't put a asus motherboard
Everyone loves ASauce.
ASOS?
Can I use this same build for heavy gaming and content creation?
So, given I'm not playing Adobe's silly games, does this work with DaVinci Resolve? If I decide to build a new AM5 PC for Resolve, maybe I should use my A770 instead of my 7900XTX, which is currently used for gaming.
This should work with davinci. I'll be testing a similar thing this week though. Building a budget editing pc
is it beneficial to use 2x intel a770's at the same time? I've seen videos online where people use 2 gpu's at the same time for rendering .. my next question is, my cpu is a ryzen 5950x, i have a am4 platform, im using a b550 motherboard now, so, if 2x intel a770 can be used, what motherboard should i get to support 2 gpus.. also, i should let you know that my main use for this pc is rendering videos for youtube at 4k
none, there is no motherboard supporting multi gpu for intel
amd multi gpu is dead
nvidia only supports it on the xx90 cards since i think, ampere (and the workstation cards)
dont think about multi-gpu before you NEED more than a single 4090
theres a reason multi-gpu on consumer platforms is essentially dead.
@@erraldstyler im currently using a rx6800xt, is the single a770 any better, or just stick with my current card?
What do you think about the budget version with R5 7600 and ARC 750, or even more budget version with R7 5700?
yeah more budget 7600 is okay, but if you can go with 8 cores the 7700.
can a 4090 be used with this GPU. meaning if i need 4090 for 3D work and this card for video editing work then will such a arrangement work?
Yes.
@@blahorgaslisk7763 thanks for the reply
Just a last query will that cause an issue with the bandwidth sharing x16 into 2 x 8 ?
@@rahulkamath6984 Now that is an interesting question. I don't see this to be a problem for the Alchemist card, but I'm less sure about the Nvidia card. Now not all motherboards share the direct PCIe lanes between the slots like that, so that's the first thing to check. If there is a PCIe slot that the Alchemist card would fit in that is connected to the motherboard chipset instead of directly to the CPU then the would be no problem. I guess that you have a AMD processor here as from what I know Intel based motherboards always share the 16 PCIe lanes from the CPU for the first x16 lanes slot and the fast M.2 connector. Not sure how they handle a second PCIe x16 slot.
Now if it results in a split into two x8 lanes slots then this might be enough to show some performance difference for the 4090, but as far as I know it wont be a total catastrophe. More like a very small performance drop in some certain cases. Using it for calculations or AI work might cause more dependence on the PCIe speed.
Frankly I do not know for sure either way. I hope others have done more testing and knows more.
@@rahulkamath6984 4.0x8 per card is fine. but you´ll probably run into driver and software issues. good luck
@@erraldstyler ok not that I am going to use it now but good know if I need it anytime soon
I would put my Aerith statue on it... she would be very dizzy after a while. Its a nice case but I'm not an rgb fan but you could always change it to a white colour
I don't suppose you will be reviewing the Silverstone Alta D1 case? Would be intrigued to see possible builds in it
If you were using an AMD CPU w/ a Nvidia GPU for a Creator/AI/ML focused PC and wanted quicksync could you just drop in an Intel A310 Low Profile for that? Yes, it's $100 USD & has only 4 Gigs of ram but if it'd handle the transcoding that the Nvidia card didn't would it possibly be worth it?
The low profile A380 is only 20-50 usd more... so unless your budget is super tight I'd invest in the higher stream processors and VRAM but the A310 is very viable too, if you can get it for much cheaper where you live, it might be the move.
@@SpoonHurler Nice! I didn't think about the A380 LP, thanks for pointing that out!
Do i need the amd gpu driver too ?
can you using both RTX card & Intel Arc ?? like using RTX for gaming & Intel Arc for editing & such ??
Yes you can easily in Resolve Studio in the settings, but for games it's a bit tricky, since you need to change the monitor display cables each time to the RTX to game (and recognize it), in case the video editing app you use prefers the same behavior as it happens in games. I edit with RTX, but use ARC for encoding/decoding in the timeline and/or export (rendering).
Place RTX in PCI-E 1 and the ARC in next PCI-E slot (both will run in PCI 3 or 4/x8).
You can also place the ARC in the last "slow" PCI-E 3 port (Gen 3/4 x4) for Quicksync and/or rendering without losing any performance, that's how I have it.
This specific setup works flawlessly in Resolve Studio, after setting up them correctly in the settings tab.
@@xarisathossir, can you accelerate with RTX and encode-decode with Intel Arc ??
@@GeryRevandra Exactly. I am doing that over a year now in Resolve Studio without any problems, which allows you to choose what card does what.
The FREE version supports only one GPU and renders only without HW acceleration, so you need the paid version. I am not sure if the other video editing apps allow such flexibility, you have to test on your own.
In few word, with the RTX 30 series GPU, CUDA does everything, apart from decoding in timeline/encoding during export (set it in settings for both cards).
Actually bought the A380 (or any other ARC, all have the same dual media engines) for the AV1 support which is present only in RTX 40 & RX 7000 series.
@@xarisathos awesome, might grab intel arc a770 soon.. thanks sir.
@@GeryRevandra It's a great GPU considering its price and the generous 16GB VRAM. It packs a punch in AI and Video apps for sure, but in games it underperforms.
If you use AI apps of any kind (even Audacity to generate music via OpenVIVO) and do video-editing/encoding work, you will be very impressed. God bless you bro
Thanks for share, I want to buy new pc for adobe lightroom, primer pro encoding. I know people say buy i9 ultra 285k with nvidia rtx 4070 süper. But I'm looking to use less electricity bill per month. This is my idea is it work. Amd ryzen 7 9700x or 9900x with intel arc 770 . Just is work A.I Adobe Firefly🤔🤔🤔 thanks for writing😊
The Beauty Shot... 07:39
Yeah I would put the Content Awards trophy in there as well Lauri!!! 🏆
Please do an Arc GPU revisit
Done, have a look at the arc video posted a few weeks ago :)
ua-cam.com/video/qTvvv9iRpdo/v-deo.html this one
He did a few weeks ago.
Oops I didn’t see he responded lol
Why not a dual GPU setup? Or does it not work?
due to budget i guess
hi i am having request for you , i am planing to start physics tutorials for my school . it is only based on screen recording with bandicam software , slides from power point . i am planing to edit it with Davinci resolve free version, only using very slight effects like time-bar , popup text .. . only in FHD export and recording . my budget plan is to build pc with 5600g ( no dedicated gpu ) . or with 5600g + gtx 1650 . is it okay or do you recommend any spec for this kind work . please replay .
I'd get a ryzen 5500 with a dedicated card of your choice if this is the route you are going... 5500 is just a 5600g without the igpu and have been 40-ish usd cheaper recently (84 right now compared to 114 for the 5500GT... which is a downclocked version of the 5600G, which is over 120 I believe).
Edit: 5600GT is 105 at best buy apparently, that's also very viable
@@SpoonHurler which gpu you recommend
@@radar1437 if you are editing in 1080p than the best 6GB VRAM gpu you can get (1650 or 1660 ti would be fine... I don't know how the low end gpu market is right now so I can't give price/perf advice), if you are doing 4k then the best 8gb+ (used 1070 or 1070ti, which is what I personally think I'd get to pair with a 5500 today but there are a lotbof options).
@@SpoonHurler what do you think of this setup -
CPU : 5500
GPU : 1650 AMP .
RAM : 16GB / 3600Mhz
SSD : crucial P3 ( 526gb)
MOBO : MSI - B450 A
but what i am confused with what PSU watt to used .
450W or 550W .[ note : iam not planning to upgrade any of these parts in future , may be ram ]
online PSU calculator suggest 450w but some reddit post say 550W .
@@radar1437 that looks great, I personally go overkill for PSUs so I would lean 550W simply because good quality ones aren't much more expensive and that's the one place we don't want to completely cheap out on, cause 10 bucks isn't worth the risk of a house fire. MSI Mag BRN or the Apevia 600W that's around 50 bucks are good options
32:05 Lauri, that is one *fat* wallet! 😉 💰
Any Ryzen 7 7700x based creator pc setup with price?
🤔maybe...
Editor went a bit overboard with the overlay effects tbh 😅
😮
Nice
Cougar? The Phanteks NV7 is much nicer and better quality.
21:16 You're going to have a Tell-tale Heart moment knowing you didn't do the right thing and clean up that cable mess. 💓💓...💓💓...
When you have hell lot of money to build pc every month😅
What a shmexy build
Get rid of the RGB
Have you tried to build with intel cpu and amd gpu? Haha😅
$600 in useless cooling/fans on a workstation wtf ? Can do as nice for less than $200