Those points near the end of the video are really impressive and give food for thought. I never thought like that before. I wish there were some questions along that line tomorrow in my exam. Thanks, your videos are really helping this hopeless student here a lot.
Great video, but at about 1:27 you mix up the allocation of Absolute vs Relative gains to the two therories on the slide, though your voice over describes it correctly
Thank you so much for the video! such a direct and clear explanation of the neo neo debate :) as an IR student I am totally recommending this video and your channel!
Thank you so much for this explanation sir. You are one million times better at explaining this to a beginner than my hugely incompetent professors. Have an exam in two days, eternally grateful to you
I don't agree with justification of war provided at 5:00. As Iraq was a Shia majority country and Hussein was a Sunni this already acted enough of a barrier to Iran, a Democratic government would've represented the interests of majority which was risky because of the shared (religious) beliefs both the states had. Instead, the debt they had from war with Iran and causing dispute with Saudi and Kuwait over oil production, led to them invading Kuwait and the aftermath, seems more precise.
As a school of thought, neorealism doesn't really address poverty. It's more squarely focused on security. Neoliberalism does include a related economic theory, so perhaps a better question would be whether neoliberalism or one of the critical theories (Marxism, feminism, constructivism) does a better job addressing questions of poverty. Thanks for watching!
there is one mistake in the video. you write absolute gains infront of neorealism and relative gains infront of neoliberalism. although you speak correctly in the video that neoliberalism are concerned with absolute gains. please correct it in ur slide as well.
@@NoahZerbe Hi. I am doing a research on Japan's approach to the South China Sea dispute. I am more keen on using neoliberalism to explain, but after watching your video, I am also thinking about neorealism. What do you think? Thank you!
You are correct. I've provided an updated version of this lecture here: ua-cam.com/video/HxEmSz6RLT0/v-deo.html (with that error corrected). Thanks for watching!
Those points near the end of the video are really impressive and give food for thought. I never thought like that before. I wish there were some questions along that line tomorrow in my exam.
Thanks, your videos are really helping this hopeless student here a lot.
Glad you found it helpful. Thanks for watching, and good luck on your exam!
Great video, but at about 1:27 you mix up the allocation of Absolute vs Relative gains to the two therories on the slide, though your voice over describes it correctly
@@NoahZerbe No worries! And thanks for the great content, you sum everything up much better than other sources I could find!
Thanks for the correction brother
Thank u so much for this brief nd clear distinctions. Its so helpful for beginners to grasp the concept easily.
Thank you so much for the video! such a direct and clear explanation of the neo neo debate :) as an IR student I am totally recommending this video and your channel!
Thank you so much for this explanation sir. You are one million times better at explaining this to a beginner than my hugely incompetent professors. Have an exam in two days, eternally grateful to you
this has been SO helpful, thank you for making this :)))
Ohh that's was awesome, thank you so much, you made my course work less of a headache.
Happy to hear it. Thanks for watching!
Great video! Thank you so much
I don't agree with justification of war provided at 5:00. As Iraq was a Shia majority country and Hussein was a Sunni this already acted enough of a barrier to Iran, a Democratic government would've represented the interests of majority which was risky because of the shared (religious) beliefs both the states had.
Instead, the debt they had from war with Iran and causing dispute with Saudi and Kuwait over oil production, led to them invading Kuwait and the aftermath, seems more precise.
Thank you sir. Who is better neorealist or neoliberalist in terms of reduction of poverty
As a school of thought, neorealism doesn't really address poverty. It's more squarely focused on security. Neoliberalism does include a related economic theory, so perhaps a better question would be whether neoliberalism or one of the critical theories (Marxism, feminism, constructivism) does a better job addressing questions of poverty. Thanks for watching!
@@NoahZerbe thanks a lot. Appreciate your time
Thank you!
Thanks for watching!
there is one mistake in the video. you write absolute gains infront of neorealism and relative gains infront of neoliberalism. although you speak correctly in the video that neoliberalism are concerned with absolute gains. please correct it in ur slide as well.
@@NoahZerbe Hi. I am doing a research on Japan's approach to the South China Sea dispute. I am more keen on using neoliberalism to explain, but after watching your video, I am also thinking about neorealism. What do you think? Thank you!
@@NoahZerbe Thank you so much! Your sharing does really help!!!
Thank you
You're welcome!
Minute 1.28 you put absolute gains and relative gains in the wrong places! 😇 I think!
You are correct. I've provided an updated version of this lecture here: ua-cam.com/video/HxEmSz6RLT0/v-deo.html (with that error corrected). Thanks for watching!
@@NoahZerbe thank you 🌿 your videos really helped me.
@@samham3901 Thank you. I'm glad you found them helpful!
very helpful thank you
:)