@@catojrgensen8912 Model 2400 seamlessly integrates multitrack recording with studio and live mixing. With the ability to record 24 channels (22 inputs plus the stereo master) of high-quality audio direct to SD media.
I owned a brand new 388 back in 1990 and am not sure that I've ever had more nostalgia and good memories for any other piece of gear than I've had for that machine. The Model 24 and 2400 are really testing my ability to resist - good work, Tascam engineers and designers! And thanks to you, Travis, for actually letting your viewers hear how it sounds. I'm not sure why reviewers often skip that detail.
Liked and Subscribed my friend - - - Thank you - great to see other old-school Tascam fans like myself - first one for me was the model 144 portaStudio, then the 244 with those super-cool "quasi-parametric" EQ, (stacked, volume 15 db and sweepable freq) then the 388~ I can't believe to see this old wonder in your studio. I have a small pile of reels runing at 7 1/2 IPS or 15 IPS if I recall - would love to get my hands on that unit again just to remember what all these tapes have for songs from the late 80's! Thank you! Just got the Model 24 and learning everything before even getting into it now. Wonderful machine and you're so right about the manuals being well made - always for all their units. Cheers from Geoff in Hamilton, Ont. Canada!
I love the workflow of a DAWless system, I find I stay creative and I commit more to the sound going into the mixer. I might use the DAW for post processing and rendering. I have to say it looks waaaay more fun in what you did than sitting behind a computer for hours.
For sure. I have been spending a lot of time mixing in the box lately and I am trying to figure out a better way. I tried out the new SSL motorized fader daw controller but I don’t really love it. Maybe I will give one of these a shot as a hybrid console lite setup.
My first time watching your videos. I was pleasantly surprised and was not expecting you to pluck a guitar like that! Nicely done!!! Great video too! I bought the model 16 about a year ago before the 2400-24 came out. I use mine as an interface with the mpc live 2. I appreciate your time on this video!
Thank you for this charismatic demo of the latest upgrade to the MOdel 24! Waiting for the 2400 to come to Canada and weighing options between SSL's BIG SIX. It made you a great one man band by the way!
I like that you auditioned the "print" of the drums. We used to call getting proper level and clarity to a track by itself a "print" back in the 24 track studio days. Of course this is raw, before any added compression, EQ or use of outboard effects like reverb. Features here that may not immediately be WINNER ideas for newb types are the sections of 48v phantom - this means your delicate ribbon mic can be used on a NON phantom section, while your mics needing phantom, like condensers or Cloud Lifter type set ups, can have their power. Typically the built in EFX in these newer units are of reasonably high quality (easily the equal of the 16 bit 44khz structure of outboard FX units of the past). Having the ability to act as a multi-track interface with reasonably high bit rate likw 24bit / 48 khz is also good. This means you are working with a roughly $1000 interface, but ALSO with a usable mixer with routing, EQ, a compressor (which you may not really want to use, depending upon where it is in the chain here), and thus, even though this thing is not cheap it covers a lot of bases.
Yeeeessssss 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 this is the review I’ve been waiting for since the first 24 came out! Now I’m sold. I have to get one. It just sounds so good. Thank you!
I had the model 12 but had to get rid of it because I like to clip preamps to get distortion and I couldn't do that without the compressor killing the signal on me!!! It was a wonderful board but that was a dealbreaker for me, not sure if they have the same signal chains but beware to those who like to get that filthy preamp distortion, really amazing equipment besides that. Great to see a new video Travis!
@@zazz63 I'm not sure I understand, the preamps are within the mixer, I use an external tube preamp but when I ran it hot into the inputs it still kicked in and limited the signal.
Ya know I've been in the market for a mixer for like a year now and this one just checks all the damn boxes. Good eq, compressors, easy compatibility, inserts and auxes for outboard... Jesus.
I am interested in the bus compressor part at the output of this 2400 Model. Could ok use SSL Bus compressor plugin instead? I would be interested in a tutorial. I currently have the 2400 Model, which has a 7-band EQ instead of a compressor. Maybe I would pair it with a 2400
awesome song, it sounded great! Dang, Could you do a video tracking to the internal SD card slot, then use the four stereo subgroups(8 outs) to print a mix down to the 38, then return the tape tracks back to your last 8 channels, & then do a “stem” print down using the built in master bus processing for the final mix?
It definitely seems to have its own sound. It’s not super clean and pristine which I kinda like. Almost has a tape feel to the sound. I’m considering getting one to get in to working with a pseudo console workflow.
I have the tascam 24 not the 2400 . it looks almost the same as yours. i have been using tascam for over 30 years since the early 90's and i just love the cleaness tascam offers .
I really want to check this out. Tried to get in touch with the folks at Tascam, but never heard back. That being said, it looks like the perfect board for a home setup or even a semi pro studio. I've had all the Model mixers at one point and they're all great, but this one is the best of all of them plus the phantom power splits and the buss compressor...pretty sweet. I have a 688 midistudio right now and if there was a way to marry the two boards I would be in love. Question: It has the DAW control features like the Model 12, right? Does it also have midi? I hear that was why the Model 12 had to be digital and not analog like the Model 16 and 24. Thanks for the video, man. Much appreciated.
Great video. How might something like this product help/hurt/influence someone like me who is pretty new to music production/audio engineering? Should I nail my "In the box" workflow and then go the more analog route? Or the other way around? Thanks!
Demo track sounds incredible, but how much better would it actually sound if they just gave us what we ACTUALLY want and reissued the 388 or even just a portastudio for that matter?
I plugged into my 388 today which I hadn't done in like a month. Just to listen to random stuff I recorded. I was blown the F away by how good it sounds.
I have a Soundcraft signature 22 MTK , that is kind of similar to this one, analog old fart that I am, and the soundcraft has better EQ, but is more difficult to use outboard gear with!
How do you use this with your reel to reel? When mixing do you mix the drum tracks first and then bounce them down into a single track or stereo track so that you can make room for lots of other instrument tracks? Like say I want to record a set of drums and then record one at a time 10 guitar tracks to layer together and also 10 other tracks of other instruments one at a time... is that how you do it by taking a group of tracks and mixing them into a single track like say for the drums, and then say doing that again for all the guitar tracks until you get to a point where you have enough faders to be able to mix everything all at once? Obvisouly I don't really know anything about it so I'm just trying to understand how this would work. Also say you record and mix on the tascam 2400, then do you record to the reel to reel to get the tape compression/saturation and then print that back to your DAW?
Does the tascam model 2400 have an adjustable 48dB/Oct highpass filter for each fader? or at least group mixes? You should apply it and cut everything below 30-40Hz 😅 I have large speakers with a flat response down to 20 something (it)Hertz 😂
@travisraab depending on the low frequency hygiene in people's mixes, it can be quite boomy. Luckily there are exceptions. If you have a 20 to 20k flat system, and add a little "Harman curve" to your parametric eq, it's even boomier 😅 I know most people have soundbars or bookshelf speakers now. But show some love for us with big fat floorstanders 😊
Bought the model 24 thinking it would do everything this thing does, thinking it’s worth trading in. For the lack of gain on the pre’s, would you be able to max out the gain on a track while simultaneously sending it out to another to get two gain stages and record to the second track?
the low gain on the press is the biggest issue with this machine. that's an interesting idea. If I'm understanding you correctly, I think that would require tons of cables to do across the machine and you would lose a channel. Not sure its worth it.
So glad you’re back! Great mixer. Did you record the tracks to the DAW or to the SD card in the mixer? Are there inserts on every channel? Sounds great.
@@travisraab cool. I had the 16 channel and the 12 channel versions. They’re great. It’s pretty fun recording right to the mixer. Also the 12 channel is a control surface. I’d say the only thing missing is motorized faders! I would like to get the model 2400 but not sure I need that much capacity!
Hey thanks for sharing your awesome review. I am contemplating purchasing one of these. If you record/track to channel 1 and stop the transport, hit rewind and hit play does it playback the track you just recorded on channel one? This board does not sound like a great option for overdubbing layers and layers of guitar correct?
That's what was advised, but the results were not ideal. I guess you need to pick your poison. Either go line in, fish for the level you need, and run through all the circuitry, or go into the insert and get a very weak / probably unbalanced signal. I did report this and that the pres are weak, as I mentioned.
One thing that turned me off about these when they came out is that they only had two inserts. It looks like they finally fixed that with this update and added combo jacks! I'd be pissed if I personally owned one of the old models. Edit: I also just realized this is an entirely different model with a different price.
Mines on the way..had 24..this will rock-I’m setting up my 4 subs as hardware effects sends to a sub mixer-rolls rack mount thing-back to the Bluetooth channel 21/22..done. Another master bus comp on inserts there so double compressor on way out to mastering.
if they could have a bit better preamp circuits that u can push harder thad be quite neat. some harmonics on the way in not just clean and pretty stuff that interfaces have covered.. then it’d be a real dreamy machine !
@@travisraabwhat does this cost? yeah.. but it’d still be cheaper then buying 24 mic preamps which could run about 12 to 25k for nice stuff. paying 6k would still be a rad deal or hmmmaybe a dirty circuit could be inserted onboard
none of them look cool enough. the big six looks even worse than this one. they should make something that looks huge and vintage and has vu meters and just line inputs. I do not give a crap what it sounds like I will buy it.
Very cool Travis. Good to see you. I have been kicked out of noodle town. I have a model 16 that I use live and sometimes for recording. But that new 24 has me intrigued. Did you record right to the SD card?
Is it possible to run aux out into a line level input in different channels (let's say 9 and 10 for this example) so you could eq the kick differently? So you could eq/compress less on the first time in and then eq and compress heavily on the second time around? Is that a thing?
If I record a live band, say I use the mixer for FOH, , and I hit record , so it’s recording the show. Does the recording record a DRY signal ( Pre) fader or WET as heard in the FOH venue? Can I adjust the recording later after performance?
I have the Model 12, and you can set pre-comp/EQ, or post-comp/EQ. This gives you the chance to have the dry signal for mixing in a DAW later on! Hope this helps
My 2400 came in on Monday of this week. Too lazy to set it up and box up my Tascam 24 which I now need to sell to deal with the $2000 I just spent. LOL
Lack of high sampling rates like 88,2 & 96K and the need for a 4 band EQ instead of 3 is the only real downsides. Great for recording a rehearsal or a bedroom drummer who doesn't mind working at 48K. All the other new feature are great lets hope Soundcraft brings out a revamped Signature MTK Mark 2 with high sampling rates.
I got rid of my presonus 32s and NSB 32.16 to get this. If you can’t afford an API desk but want a proper inline console this is it. The master out will let you use a proper pro mastering chain. Don’t think this is a toy. I have a $50000 studio and this works just fine. You do not need higher sample rates. You will be mastering at 44.1 in atmos.
@@marcpinion What? 96K has been the standard since 2014. Apple won't brand you song Hi res Lossless in Apple Music unless its 24bit 96K. The Dolby TrueHD codec is 96K and has been the Atmos standard for movies since the Blu-ray disc. Even the Free versions of streaming apps push out 48K lossy files but on upload they prefer 96K. The Tascam console isn't an inline desk it does not have 2 full sets of inputs on 1 channel. But hey if you like it thats great. But its not what I expect from Tascam after they have been pushing 96K in their flagship Tascam Sonicview digital consoles. They added some good feature but the lack of standard sampling rates is just lack luster on Tascam's part. Cheers
Yada yada yada. The Tascam Model 2400 is nowhere to be found to be purchased. I'm glad the UA-cam influencers got their units though... that's what counts.
why would you want to use a multitrack tape recorder when it has a built in digital recorder but you do have groups and auxiliary outs so how many tracks is your tape recorder?
Buy Tascam Model 2400: sweetwater.sjv.io/oqEQ9Y
Recording straight on SD card sounds better than using as an interface. . . trust me.
@@hellofx Why is that? And isn't it still so, that the SD card only records a stereo track and not all tracks individually? Huge no no for me.
@@catojrgensen8912 Model 2400 seamlessly integrates multitrack recording with studio and live mixing. With the ability to record 24 channels (22 inputs plus the stereo master) of high-quality audio direct to SD media.
I owned a brand new 388 back in 1990 and am not sure that I've ever had more nostalgia and good memories for any other piece of gear than I've had for that machine. The Model 24 and 2400 are really testing my ability to resist - good work, Tascam engineers and designers! And thanks to you, Travis, for actually letting your viewers hear how it sounds. I'm not sure why reviewers often skip that detail.
Liked and Subscribed my friend - - - Thank you - great to see other old-school Tascam fans like myself - first one for me was the model 144 portaStudio, then the 244 with those super-cool "quasi-parametric" EQ, (stacked, volume 15 db and sweepable freq) then the 388~ I can't believe to see this old wonder in your studio. I have a small pile of reels runing at 7 1/2 IPS or 15 IPS if I recall - would love to get my hands on that unit again just to remember what all these tapes have for songs from the late 80's!
Thank you! Just got the Model 24 and learning everything before even getting into it now. Wonderful machine and you're so right about the manuals being well made - always for all their units.
Cheers from Geoff in Hamilton, Ont. Canada!
This is the best mix I have heard from this console. Really great job, outstanding.
I love the workflow of a DAWless system, I find I stay creative and I commit more to the sound going into the mixer. I might use the DAW for post processing and rendering. I have to say it looks waaaay more fun in what you did than sitting behind a computer for hours.
For sure. I have been spending a lot of time mixing in the box lately and I am trying to figure out a better way. I tried out the new SSL motorized fader daw controller but I don’t really love it. Maybe I will give one of these a shot as a hybrid console lite setup.
My first time watching your videos. I was pleasantly surprised and was not expecting you to pluck a guitar like that! Nicely done!!! Great video too! I bought the model 16 about a year ago before the 2400-24 came out. I use mine as an interface with the mpc live 2. I appreciate your time on this video!
Thank you for this charismatic demo of the latest upgrade to the MOdel 24! Waiting for the 2400 to come to Canada and weighing options between SSL's BIG SIX. It made you a great one man band by the way!
Would love to know what the comparison was + what Mixer you went with🎉✌🏼
For the first time I'm interested in those new tascam mixers
Looking forward to more videos on this machine.
You are definitely the early bird on this and everyone will be watching!
Great stuff - Thank you!!
Glad to see you back bud! salutes from Argentina
Muchaaaachooooos
Happy to see you uploading again
I like that you auditioned the "print" of the drums. We used to call getting proper level and clarity to a track by itself a "print" back in the 24 track studio days. Of course this is raw, before any added compression, EQ or use of outboard effects like reverb. Features here that may not immediately be WINNER ideas for newb types are the sections of 48v phantom - this means your delicate ribbon mic can be used on a NON phantom section, while your mics needing phantom, like condensers or Cloud Lifter type set ups, can have their power.
Typically the built in EFX in these newer units are of reasonably high quality (easily the equal of the 16 bit 44khz structure of outboard FX units of the past). Having the ability to act as a multi-track interface with reasonably high bit rate likw 24bit / 48 khz is also good. This means you are working with a roughly $1000 interface, but ALSO with a usable mixer with routing, EQ, a compressor (which you may not really want to use, depending upon where it is in the chain here), and thus, even though this thing is not cheap it covers a lot of bases.
Great video, looking forward to your longterm assessment with this.
No doubt, it's a great studiotool combining so many features!
Yeeeessssss 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 this is the review I’ve been waiting for since the first 24 came out! Now I’m sold. I have to get one. It just sounds so good. Thank you!
Thanks for the demo! I've been considering purchasing a 2400, looks like a fine machine.
doctor good to hear from you
Welcome back dude!!
Hey Scott, thanks!
Glad you're back!!
I had the model 12 but had to get rid of it because I like to clip preamps to get distortion and I couldn't do that without the compressor killing the signal on me!!! It was a wonderful board but that was a dealbreaker for me, not sure if they have the same signal chains but beware to those who like to get that filthy preamp distortion, really amazing equipment besides that. Great to see a new video Travis!
surely all that kind of thing is done with preamps ..not the desk.
I believe the difference is that the 12 is actually a digital mixer, and these bigger models are not.
@@zazz63 I'm not sure I understand, the preamps are within the mixer, I use an external tube preamp but when I ran it hot into the inputs it still kicked in and limited the signal.
@@rosygrove .. i mean the external preamp delivers a clipped signal to the tascam.
the vibe & aesthetics of your equipment make me want to record there lol FIRE Tascams
He's back!:)
haha love it man. Great demo and as always, you're a chuckle factory. Good playing too
Ya know I've been in the market for a mixer for like a year now and this one just checks all the damn boxes. Good eq, compressors, easy compatibility, inserts and auxes for outboard... Jesus.
but no returns ..need to lose channels.
Im glad I got mine 4 months ago and I get more songs done now. Its also really good feeling to get away from the computer.
Excellent demo! Thank you for sharing. Not seeing any actual in use of it.
I love mine
It'd be interesting to see you use this as a mixer for the reel-to-reel recorder. A digital-analog hybrid setup might be interesting and/or useful!
The cowbell level was fine with me. Lovely music. Crazy how far you set the mic on classical gtr.
He's back, i miss you bro sjdjfj
missed u bro! Might have to pick one of these up
I like my desk, it has the meter bridge, 20 chanels plus 8 busses, the Ramsa WR820
@@pedroboschibrasil Great desk
would love to see your gain stage process with all the outboard + 2400
Damn your studio space is so cool.
I wish I could go to Noodle Town. :(
I am interested in the bus compressor part at the output of this 2400 Model. Could ok use SSL Bus compressor plugin instead? I would be interested in a tutorial. I currently have the 2400 Model, which has a 7-band EQ instead of a compressor. Maybe I would pair it with a 2400
I would love to see a video of you using the board with your tape machine. I have the same setup and curious how it would work.
great video!
Is it possible to record every channel seperately at the same time WITH board-EQ right into cubase? Kind regards.
If using as an interface, how can you route internal computer sound?😶🌫😎
wow this looks and sounds interesting! Did you compare the sound to the old Tascam already? It would be intersting how the channels differ
awesome song, it sounded great! Dang, Could you do a video tracking to the internal SD card slot, then use the four stereo subgroups(8 outs) to print a mix down to the 38, then return the tape tracks back to your last 8 channels, & then do a “stem” print down using the built in master bus processing for the final mix?
It definitely seems to have its own sound. It’s not super clean and pristine which I kinda like. Almost has a tape feel to the sound. I’m considering getting one to get in to working with a pseudo console workflow.
I want this !
Bravo TRG
thanks Big Matt!
Could I hook this up for recording to a reel to reel tape machine like a Fostex A8?
I have the tascam 24 not the 2400 . it looks almost the same as yours. i have been using tascam for over 30 years since the early 90's and i just love the cleaness tascam offers .
I really want to check this out. Tried to get in touch with the folks at Tascam, but never heard back. That being said, it looks like the perfect board for a home setup or even a semi pro studio. I've had all the Model mixers at one point and they're all great, but this one is the best of all of them plus the phantom power splits and the buss compressor...pretty sweet.
I have a 688 midistudio right now and if there was a way to marry the two boards I would be in love.
Question:
It has the DAW control features like the Model 12, right? Does it also have midi? I hear that was why the Model 12 had to be digital and not analog like the Model 16 and 24.
Thanks for the video, man. Much appreciated.
Hi Jason yes it has midi!
Great video. How might something like this product help/hurt/influence someone like me who is pretty new to music production/audio engineering? Should I nail my "In the box" workflow and then go the more analog route? Or the other way around? Thanks!
It probably would be overkill. Just use what you have or get a $100 interface
Man. Can each individual channel output on its own individual channel on playback? So essentially it could be treated like a 24 track tape machine.
great rundown, thanks! any idea or opinion on whether there will be a similar update to the Model 16?
no idea
Demo track sounds incredible, but how much better would it actually sound if they just gave us what we ACTUALLY want and reissued the 388 or even just a portastudio for that matter?
I plugged into my 388 today which I hadn't done in like a month. Just to listen to random stuff I recorded. I was blown the F away by how good it sounds.
is there any daw latency when using it as an interface?
Anything going into a computer will have latency...
@@danielmcdillI'm sure hes asking if theres any noticeable latency, that might make it difficult to monitor while tracking.
I have a Soundcraft signature 22 MTK , that is kind of similar to this one, analog old fart that I am, and the soundcraft has better EQ, but is more difficult to use outboard gear with!
Doesnt have analog compression or dawless multitrack tho
How do you use this with your reel to reel? When mixing do you mix the drum tracks first and then bounce them down into a single track or stereo track so that you can make room for lots of other instrument tracks? Like say I want to record a set of drums and then record one at a time 10 guitar tracks to layer together and also 10 other tracks of other instruments one at a time... is that how you do it by taking a group of tracks and mixing them into a single track like say for the drums, and then say doing that again for all the guitar tracks until you get to a point where you have enough faders to be able to mix everything all at once? Obvisouly I don't really know anything about it so I'm just trying to understand how this would work. Also say you record and mix on the tascam 2400, then do you record to the reel to reel to get the tape compression/saturation and then print that back to your DAW?
how woukd you go about using the model 2400 as a mixer with a Tascam 38 ? also you think a tascam model 12/16 would suffice as well ? thank you !
Does the tascam model 2400 have an adjustable 48dB/Oct highpass filter for each fader? or at least group mixes? You should apply it and cut everything below 30-40Hz 😅 I have large speakers with a flat response down to 20 something (it)Hertz 😂
what does life sound like down there?
@travisraab depending on the low frequency hygiene in people's mixes, it can be quite boomy. Luckily there are exceptions. If you have a 20 to 20k flat system, and add a little "Harman curve" to your parametric eq, it's even boomier 😅 I know most people have soundbars or bookshelf speakers now. But show some love for us with big fat floorstanders 😊
Bought the model 24 thinking it would do everything this thing does, thinking it’s worth trading in. For the lack of gain on the pre’s, would you be able to max out the gain on a track while simultaneously sending it out to another to get two gain stages and record to the second track?
the low gain on the press is the biggest issue with this machine. that's an interesting idea. If I'm understanding you correctly, I think that would require tons of cables to do across the machine and you would lose a channel. Not sure its worth it.
So glad you’re back! Great mixer. Did you record the tracks to the DAW or to the SD card in the mixer? Are there inserts on every channel? Sounds great.
Yo dawg. On this video I recorded to DAW. Yessir, inserts on every channel.
@@travisraab cool. I had the 16 channel and the 12 channel versions. They’re great. It’s pretty fun recording right to the mixer. Also the 12 channel is a control surface. I’d say the only thing missing is motorized faders! I would like to get the model 2400 but not sure I need that much capacity!
Can you use your own effects or are you limited to using Tascams? I would appreciate an answer. Thanks
Can you eq and comp on your way into pro tools or logic?? Or does it just record everything raw ??
Hey thanks for sharing your awesome review. I am contemplating purchasing one of these. If you record/track to channel 1 and stop the transport, hit rewind and hit play does it playback the track you just recorded on channel one? This board does not sound like a great option for overdubbing layers and layers of guitar correct?
If you record to the SD then it operates like a digital portastudio basically. No, you could record layers of guitars.
tight! any reason you ran the Warm preamp into the insert instead of the line input above it?
That's what was advised, but the results were not ideal. I guess you need to pick your poison. Either go line in, fish for the level you need, and run through all the circuitry, or go into the insert and get a very weak / probably unbalanced signal. I did report this and that the pres are weak, as I mentioned.
I'd recommend you to dim the screen light. It changed my life.
One thing that turned me off about these when they came out is that they only had two inserts. It looks like they finally fixed that with this update and added combo jacks! I'd be pissed if I personally owned one of the old models. Edit: I also just realized this is an entirely different model with a different price.
Mines on the way..had 24..this will rock-I’m setting up my 4 subs as hardware effects sends to a sub mixer-rolls rack mount thing-back to the Bluetooth channel 21/22..done. Another master bus comp on inserts there so double compressor on way out to mastering.
if they could have a bit better preamp circuits that u can push harder thad be quite neat. some harmonics on the way in not just clean and pretty stuff that interfaces have covered.. then it’d be a real dreamy machine !
I agree. But it would prob cost a lot more then.
@@travisraabwhat does this cost? yeah.. but it’d still be cheaper then buying 24 mic preamps which could run about 12 to 25k for nice stuff. paying 6k would still be a rad deal or hmmmaybe a dirty circuit could be inserted onboard
whats your thoughts on this vs the other tascam models, as well as this vs the SSL big six
none of them look cool enough. the big six looks even worse than this one. they should make something that looks huge and vintage and has vu meters and just line inputs. I do not give a crap what it sounds like I will buy it.
Tone monster.
Yusssssss! ❤
Very cool Travis. Good to see you. I have been kicked out of noodle town. I have a model 16 that I use live and sometimes for recording. But that new 24 has me intrigued. Did you record right to the SD card?
No I used the 2400 as an interface into DAW. I am a plugin pirate.
@@travisraab ok. 😁😁
Is it possible to run aux out into a line level input in different channels (let's say 9 and 10 for this example) so you could eq the kick differently? So you could eq/compress less on the first time in and then eq and compress heavily on the second time around? Is that a thing?
There is a basic bounce function. So I think this might be possible somehow.
can't see why not ..
If I record a live band, say I use the mixer for FOH, , and I hit record , so it’s recording the show. Does the recording record a DRY signal ( Pre) fader or WET as heard in the FOH venue? Can I adjust the recording later after performance?
I have the Model 12, and you can set pre-comp/EQ, or post-comp/EQ. This gives you the chance to have the dry signal for mixing in a DAW later on! Hope this helps
was this sponsored by tascam ? I've been looking to buy but saids not in stock yet
Sounds Awesome man! #pluginprincess
their site gives no projected availability. Wonder why
My 2400 came in on Monday of this week. Too lazy to set it up and box up my Tascam 24 which I now need to sell to deal with the $2000 I just spent. LOL
Did you get it going? How do you like it so far?
@@davidharrison6208 Sorry, I still haven't unboxed it.
I never felt good with the regular DAWs. This changed everything, we can simply focus on the music. Less is more.
really thought you were naked and on all fours at 0:07
The key to attract new viewers: Wearing skin color short pants! 😁
Lack of high sampling rates like 88,2 & 96K and the need for a 4 band EQ instead of 3 is the only real downsides. Great for recording a rehearsal or a bedroom drummer who doesn't mind working at 48K. All the other new feature are great lets hope Soundcraft brings out a revamped Signature MTK Mark 2 with high sampling rates.
I got rid of my presonus 32s and NSB 32.16 to get this. If you can’t afford an API desk but want a proper inline console this is it. The master out will let you use a proper pro mastering chain. Don’t think this is a toy. I have a $50000 studio and this works just fine. You do not need higher sample rates. You will be mastering at 44.1 in atmos.
@@marcpinion What? 96K has been the standard since 2014. Apple won't brand you song Hi res Lossless in Apple Music unless its 24bit 96K. The Dolby TrueHD codec is 96K and has been the Atmos standard for movies since the Blu-ray disc. Even the Free versions of streaming apps push out 48K lossy files but on upload they prefer 96K. The Tascam console isn't an inline desk it does not have 2 full sets of inputs on 1 channel. But hey if you like it thats great. But its not what I expect from Tascam after they have been pushing 96K in their flagship Tascam Sonicview digital consoles. They added some good feature but the lack of standard sampling rates is just lack luster on Tascam's part. Cheers
Yada yada yada. The Tascam Model 2400 is nowhere to be found to be purchased. I'm glad the UA-cam influencers got their units though... that's what counts.
I got mine from Andertons in the UK 2 weeks ago. I did have it on preorder and had to wait. Very happy with it.
Just bought one from Zzounds👍🏻
Was looking into this. Without direct outs per channel it’s useless with a multi track tape recorder.
why would you want to use a multitrack tape recorder when it has a built in digital recorder but you do have groups and auxiliary outs so how many tracks is your tape recorder?
You do have individual outs. You use inserts just like we did with tape in the 1970s.
@@zazz63tape is much better than digital. Digital is much better to edit.
@@marcpinion 16 or 24 tape in and outs? Awesome.
Meh I'll just wait 'til 2025 for the Model 2500
25 channel?
5 band eq😝
Still not impressed just a bit bigger than the 24 but the same BS !
Sorry - but no MIDI, no studio. Old modules had
This new Model 2400 does have MIDI