Leopard 2 Main Battle Tank How it Works with modular Space Armour Leopard 2A6 Loepard 2A4
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 тра 2024
- Time Stamp
0:00 Leopard 2
0:10 Interior
0:45 Tiger Tanks Panzer Tanks
0:51 Entering Service
1:02 Joint Programme with M1 Abrams
1:13 Comparision Leopard 2A4 2A5
1:23 Singapore Leopard Evolution
1:33 Indonesian Leopard Revolution
1:42 Wedge Space Add On Armour
2:13 Rheinmetall Rh-120 Smooth Bore
2:35 Specs
3:10 Comparision with T90 and M1 A2C Abrams
3:12 Crew
3:42 Ammunition Storage Rack
4:03 High Explosive Round
5:03 Spaced Armour How it Works
5:26 Leopard 2 reactive armour (Suggested)
5:34 EMES 15 TELESCOPE
6:04 STEP 1 Hunter Killer Engagement Cabalities
6:21 STEP 2 Loader
6:26 STEP 3 Gunner
6:58 Engine
7:32 How to Drive a Tank
7:58 Pros and Cons
8:41 Cons
The Leopard 2, was the first version of the tank.
While the Leopard 2A4, was the most common version of the Tank, with around 3500! produced till today.
This is the Leopard Evolution which introduced wedge-shaped, spaced add-on armor to the turret front, and the frontal area of the sides.
The frontal "heavy" third of the side skirts were replaced with a new, stronger armour.
Stripping all the covers reveals the Lehperd 2A4 inside it.
This is very common, in military engineering where Tanks, are re fitted with upgrades
and some improvements in the main armor composition.
This is the Leopard 2 "A"6 which Includes the addition of the Rheinmetal, One 20 mm, "L" 55 smoothbore gun, and a number of other changes.
One of the major Exterior differences is the gun, Let us compare this to the older models to understand it's gun size.
Find us on Facebook
/ aitelly-1089. .
Support us in Buy Me a Coffee
www.buymeacoffee.com/aitelly
Instagram
/ aitelly3d
Twitter
/ aitelly3d
We make it on Blender
Download it is free and Safe
www.blender.org/download/
Peace Out
As a Small Channel We encourage you sharing our Videos ,
But Kindly be advised that any unofficial translations or editing of our work in any medium will be considered a breach of our intellectual property rights.
Apologies for the Legal Language, This happens because we had faced a lot of Duplicates Contents through Experiences ;)
This has been a result of Big Channels Duplicating our Contents Ripping our original hard work which we have created from Scratch from Modeling to Rigging to Animation to Rendering.So we had to involved Lawyers. - Наука та технологія
For those interested i will deepdive into the purpose, design and use of the added spaced armor present on a6 variants and variants after.
When this spaced armor was designed it was designed with specific care to both the design of Russian apfsds and the design of Russian tanks as these are interlinked.
We start with the Russian shells and their limitations which lead to the design choice of the Leopard 2's added armor.
Modern Russian tanks use autoloaders, specifically a carousel, this autoloader design along with the compact design of Russian tanks comes at a very niche cost.
Because of Russian tanks compact interior, having an autoloader that was loading the entire shell in one stage became impossible, instead the solution (as with many other tanks) became to separate the ammunition into two stages, the propellant and the shell itself.
This allowed the autoloader to fit and work within the tanks confinement, however as size is an issue the length of the penetrator rod CANNOT be increased further without making the autoloading impossible. It is because of this that the Russians moved to a larger gun on the T14 Armata.
Now how is this important?
Well the penetrating power of a modern APFSDS Directly correlates to the length of the rod, as such the Russians are locked into a limiting roof regarding their shells penetrating power as all of their modern tanks use guns with a calibre of 125mm.
Now how does this tie back to the design of the Leopard 2's added armor?
The design is quite ingenious in it's simplicity. Since it was known that the Russians had locked themselves into this dilemma of rod length German tank designers knew the upper limits of rod length that could be acheived with the Russian guns.
The added armor was then designed so that the space between the original composite armor and the new added armor was longer than the longest rod length possible to acheive with the Russian main 125mm gun.
This means that no matter which apfsds the Russians use the same result is acheived.
When the rod penetrates the spaced armor it is ensured that the rod will have space within the gap to rotate off axis, meaning the rod will NOT impact with it's penetrator in line with it's velocity vector.
This in turn nullifies almost all of the penetrating power of the rod making the front of the Leopard 2 turret impervious to any possible Russian ammunition UNLESS the Russians change the main gun of their tanks.
Thanks for coming to my TED talk!
Ted talk has been pinned to the comment section
@@Aitelly thank you!
That isnt neccery true, that you cant have a better apfsds instead of increasing its lenght maybe you can increase the caliber. Before the fall of the soviet union the russian experimented with the idea of simplifying their ammo logistics and up gunning their tanks at the same time. This was tried on a t80 which was fitted with a 152.4mm gun. The project was a success.
Also they used a the same carousel autoloader and it had no problem fitting the charges and the ammo.
@@Silver_Prussian The point is that the material doesnt matter, so long as the rod is limited by length it will not align with its velocity vector and thus material makes little difference.
@@axlfrhalo when did i say anything about material also the 152mm gun has longer shells and they fit so i am not sure there is that much of a limitation on their apfsds
I was a Leopard 2A4 and 2A5 tank commander in the 90s.
Its hard to find exact information on tanks, if you havent served in one.
Range of the main gun is a lot more than 2km. The multipurpose round has around that range, maybe a bit more, but its slow and flies in a curved arc, while the kinetic round (really, why do English use these annyoing abreviations? In German its just MZ and KE rounds) is fast and flies witha lmost no curve and is accurate way past the 3km. Cant remember exactly what max range is for it in combat, on shooting ranges it was limited though.
While the coax MG indeed has the 1.2km max range. At that range it looks as if the rounds fall from the sky onto the target like tracer rain.
The hull ammo storage is indeed not protected and not usable during combat.
The turret storage you didnt mention, that one is blast protected, and the only ammunition the crew can use during combat. Thats only 15 rounds (or so). Sounds very little. But then again, the Leopard is supposed to one shot kill any target, so in theory each Leopard 2 wipes out a full other MBT platoon before they have to reload. (or hide somewhere safe and get the rounds from the hull up into the turret)
Biggest Con for Leopard 2 - it still doesnt have any active protection. No missile detection, no laser warner, no nuttin.
Doesn't the 2A7V have those things now?
@@pm7353 No active protection on the brandnew 2A7V. Its the still hypothetical next one, the 2A7A1 that has active protection similiar to what the Israelis got for way over a decade.
Some of the stuff that got added to the 2A7V sounds like pure scifi though.
@@theskilllessgamer5795 Die A8 Version wird mit Trophy ausgestattet sein. Zulauf 2025/2026
Да да, хранилище в задней части башни, которое замечательно вспыхивает. Это просто дорогой гроб.
@@user-wy4ee7nk1d So you dont even understand what a blast protected compartment is. Da Da, school was wasted on you. Have fun being mobilzed.
4:28 I want to correct you here. The fins of the APFSDS round are not meant to give it rotation, it is to provide aerodynamic stability to the round, hence the name "Fin Stabilized". Rotating a long, thin rod will only makes it aerodynamically unstable, even with the fins added, which is why it is best fired from a smoothbore gun. Rifled tank guns use APFSDS with slip obturator on the sabot to cancel out the gun rifling.
Also 450 mm is a Joke haha modern APFSDS go 800mm and Beyond
"Rotating a long, thin rod will only makes it aerodynamically unstable"
wait, that's how arrows work, need more explanation.
@@moxinghbian Arrows dont travel as fast as shells, also they dont rotate as fast as being rifled through a barrel either. The fins are there to give stability by means of aerodynamic, not gyroscopic.
@@hjmuhdfirdaus3038 l disagree, it is very hard to ensure accuracy with hard welded fins (like those in an unguided bomb) without a build in control system to correct the influence of wind or air density change. spinning it can surely help. Besides, all the slow mo videos of those rounds are all showing the rod spinning.
@@moxinghbian arrows don't really spin, what do you think the feathers that are often placed at the back are for
I was a Leopard 2 commander in the 90th.
Sorry, you forgot the most important part of the Leopard2.
The Leopard 2 simulators were already in the 90th light years ahead in technology.
Took 3 month to teach a crew, only with little time on a real tank.
@strange3916 Awesome man .
We missed a lot of stuff here and there.
We also forgot to mention the Bomb Doors as well
А по сути все танки это гроб на колёсах
@@user-ru7dz7en2ythat’s just a lie, only Russian tanks are like that.
@@4skintim962 где же наступление Украины с техникой запада и сша. А точно они уже уничтожены не доехав до фронта. А как там patriot ? А точно сгорели одним ударом сразу 5 штук. Украина пока воевала советской техникой ещё сопротивлялись,а вот с западной техникой сразу в могилу 🤣
@@Aitelly also you put a panther turret on that tiger model
The model of the „Tiger“ you have shown at the beginning has quite a „Panther“ turret. At 2:26 you show a 2A4 Evolution and called it a „2a5“. The 2a5 looks pretty much the same as the „2a6“ but with an shorter barrel. But great Animation and explanation👍
The thing about ww2 Germany mass producing tanks was not their problem, they could have done that.
But it would have been useless, since they didn't have the fuel for a massive tank army.
Also Hitler made the same mistake that Putin did in Ukraine. He thought once his army enters the Soviet Union, their whole "rotten structure" would collapse.
That is a proposal for the Panzerkampfwagen VI Ausf. H2, using a regular Tiger I chassis and a new turret designed by Rheinmetall mounting the 75mm L70 gun.
@@KurriKlown Thanks! Never heard of that proposal. Just found that Look a bit confusing in the context of the video.
the prophet mohamd said : The Jews split into seventy-one sects, one of which will be in Paradise(Those who are faithful to God and worship Him alone and muslum by the path of Moses until the coming of Jesus ) and seventy in Hell . The Christians split into seventy-two sects, seventy-one of which will be in Hell and one in Paradise(Those who are faithful to God and worship Him alone and muslum by the path of jessus until the coming of mohamed). I swear by the One Whose Hand is the soul of Muhammad, my nation will split into seventy-three sects, one of which will be in Paradise and seventy-two in Hell.” It was said: “O Messenger of Allah, who are they?” He said: “The main body(Those who are faithful to God and worship Him alone as salafi as al albanian and ibn otheimin ibn timia ibn kaiim ) .........We must follow the truth and not follow the devil and not follow ourselves.
your life will change from doubt and confusion to a good and tranquil life
If u would know anything about leopards u would see this two tanks are not those who are send to Ukraine. The one who send to Ukraine are the first leopards from the 90s so there is not a single screw similar. The whole turrent is new the whole concept is new and reinvented so don't compare this to those actual outsourced ones
Thank you,for the enjoyable animation, the depth of research, and top-notch delivery! I'm a more knowledgeable PC Warrior since finding your channel!
You are the same with the 2 of us.
This channel keeps getting better and better! Thank you guys and gals for making these brilliant videos for the public to see. The production values and editing of your videos are sublime!
Thanks 🙏 for understanding the hardwork that goes into it.
Is it true that there is a toiletinside?
You're animations makes understanding so easier for defence noobs like me.
Thanks 🙏👍 really appreciate your support
He made the Tiger 1 model with a Panther main gun 💀
"You are animations"? Are you high? 😂😂
the prophet mohamd said : The Jews split into seventy-one sects, one of which will be in Paradise(Those who are faithful to God and worship Him alone and muslum by the path of Moses until the coming of Jesus ) and seventy in Hell . The Christians split into seventy-two sects, seventy-one of which will be in Hell and one in Paradise(Those who are faithful to God and worship Him alone and muslum by the path of jessus until the coming of mohamed). I swear by the One Whose Hand is the soul of Muhammad, my nation will split into seventy-three sects, one of which will be in Paradise and seventy-two in Hell.” It was said: “O Messenger of Allah, who are they?” He said: “The main body(Those who are faithful to God and worship Him alone as salafi as al albanian and ibn otheimin ibn timia ibn kaiim ) .........We must follow the truth and not follow the devil and not follow ourselves.
your life will change from doubt and confusion to a good and tranquil life
@@anonymous-hz2un 2 month's late but i typed you're not you are
Great video with very high production values. Appreciate hearing the pros and cons. And most appreciate using a HUMAN VOICE!! Well done.
i was ´Panzersoldat´ on leopard2 in german army ,
respekt !
one of the best descriptions of the beast.
greatings from germany !
Danke from Texas.
Great to meet a Real Specialist wirth real experience.
@@Aitelly ``Panzer Hurra`` my friend
... in the* German army / respect* / Greetings* from Germany*. Länder und Länder-bezogenen Adjektive werden auf Englisch immer großgeschrieben!
спасибо за видео товарищи, для меня, как оператора Ланцета, это было довольно информативное видео :)
Братан ланцет не нужен, отдохни, старый добрый РПГ у нас есть. Андрей ДШБ Россия, Донбасс.
😀😃
@@dhba760 Тут все нужно, FPV дроны с выстрелами от РПГ-7, Ланцет, Вихрь, Корнет
Great content and phenomenal graphics. This video was just incredible visually. Very, very nice work!
Much appreciated! Stay tune for next friday more beter video coming
I am always excited to watch such videos. Great edits.
Glad you like them!
The fins on the apfsds ammunition actually prevent spin on the projectile. Unlike regular bullets, apfsds rounds will not spin they will tumble end over end if fired out of a rifled gun. That is why tank cannons use smoothbore guns.
Ok great Informative Comment thanks for educating us.
What about the Chally?
Very informative: 9/10 recommend to anyone who's looking for how a Leopard 2 works
Damn that comment aged like milk
Lancet like this 😂
bro the driver is in between the two gas tanks and the ammunition haha 😅
I like the fact that everyone just brags about their tanks, when in reality it easily be destroyed, 30 of those have been lost till now.
Show evidence,like Oryx or similar. Oh,right,it’s fake
@@cosasdetanques007see my reply
@@cosasdetanques007can u see my reply
Proud to have been a gunner in one of these beasts.
It’s much cooler if ur the person who shoots and loads the shell
So you just bragging about living my dream? 🤣
Have you lost confidence in it after what has happened to it over the past couple days?
I dont think you want to be a gunner now😂😂😂
@@mihaipaul4962 and he is a little less proud
The turret wedges are not simply spaced armor, but modular system with multiple steps. It is a misconception that the spaced armor is „enough“ to destabilize a long-rod penetrator. I’ve seen it explained quite often in this comment section.
I’m going to keep it short:
- The front of the wedge has heavy-NxRA (non-explosive reactive armor) elements that work similarly to the heavy-ERA „RELIKT“ which is in Russian use. These basically expand into different directions when being in contact with the HEAT-jet/APFSDS. This causes directional stress that results in the penetrator being deformed and broken.
- The destabilized remaining bits of the penetrator are lastly going to hit the main armor. These are nowhere close capable of penetrating it. The main internal armor has been upgraded several times, and reportedly, recently in the 2A7V too. It consists of ceramics, titanium, tungsten and multiple other high streng steel alloys and materials.
Didn't help the Ukranians this week.
@@andykerr3803it did. Maybe the tanks didn't survive, but the crews did. Which is kinda the job of armor i guess.
@@T.efpunkt If they lived, it's doubtful their hearing and brains function well.
The number of handicapped will be a massive drain.
@@andykerr3803 what brain damage??
@@T.efpunkt The concusive forces do damage over time. You don't walk away untouched.
Uav lancet miss u
Russia has the best tank a t55 with a dishwasher motherboard so mitghy
I absolutely love your content and the videos are brilliantly done! Thanks a lot for your amazing work and keep up with it. :)
Glad you like them!
I'm so glad you explained how a steering wheel works, had no idea
Excellent description and artwork/graphics! Thanks!
Lancet seems to do the job on these pretty well.
ланцет не может пробивать высоко бронированные цели
@@babush6 , ха - ха !!!!
someone's salty that their favorite villain isn't winning the war
@@AlexeiVorobev who Zelinsky or Biden?
@@asdnetwork4268 the one who's soldiers castrate and decapitate on video
Lancet - derived from brachiostomy in Russian. Branchiostoma is one of the few living genera of lancelets (order Amphioxus). It is the type genus of the family Branchiostoma. These small animals, vaguely resembling an eel or a snake, are close relatives of vertebrates. I love the Russian tradition of naming the deadliest types of weapons with the sweetest names.
Mantis shrimp are carnivorous marine crustaceans of the order Stomatopoda (from Ancient Greek στόμα (stóma) 'mouth', and ποδός (podós) 'foot'). Stomatopods branched off from other members of the class Malacostraca around 340 million years ago.
I think they mean surgeon lancets
@@mihailraskin2912Верно это название из медицины, так же есть изделие под название скальпель.
This channel is awesome, could watch hours of your content.
Glad you liked it. thanks
Great Animation. Good Job
Thanks
@@Aitelly you Too
Because of what you guys do I really want to learn how to use blender 3D and make such cool animations but I mostly busy with college and exams or lazy. I really hope that I start this May.
Great it takes time to learn any 3d Software .
Just don't give up. It's like learning to play Music
@@Aitelly , Thanks I won't give up : ) BTW, Can you a video on Barak-8 SAM. It is okay if you have other projects.
In the abrams the gunner presses a button and the computer lases the target and does all the elevation then the gunner fires immediately to give the least time for laser detectors to act laze and blaze.
Best of all, this UA-cam channel should provide foreign dubbing language support in all its content.
In 4:28, APFSDS darts do not spin. Spinning is only effective for a shell with length/diameter ratio of approximately 6. With the ratio of 20, APFSDS will get unnecessary moments if it spins, thus they just use fins to stabilise the dart, thus the name.
Yeah, there are many things wrong in this video, including spelling.
Скажи спасибо, что не изобразили снаряд вылетающий из ствола пушки вместе с гильзой.)))
thankyou for the comment and educating everyone...
Leopard + Lancet =❤
😁😁😜😜+ Vikhr + Kornet
Хахаха, точно, смертельная любовь!😊👍
T-90 + Javelin =♥️
@@cold_raptor Comendante + Javelin = ❤️
@@sergush you do know thats a Coffee machine right...
Оказался картонной коробкой.
This channel is fantastic!! God bless you!
God Bless you too. 🙏 Thanks a Ton
Very good video and description of the mbt specs. Top attack continue a cons in the Leo series. Remember what happened with the Turkish Leos in Syria. Thank you
Very informative. Really enjoyed the content. Liked the unbiased positioning. Would like to see British challenger and the new panzer. Great job.
these animations are top notch 👌brilliant content👍
Thanks and we are Truly Humble
Those edits are mind boggling lol!!
Love from india
although Leo 2 is one of my favorite MBT I do question why don't they add blow out panel for the ammunition in front hull? I know they try to reduce the chance of cook off by using new fire resistance propellant but that doesn't really insure the crew safety when it does catch on fire, so I have no idea why they don't add those because the ammunition just sit there unprotected either maybe some thin metal sheeting but that's all about it
Finally 😁
Waited 6 days for this video....
Btw i was thought that video is on kf51 panther tank but I was wrong 🙂
& NXT video on Tata Kestrel armour fighting vehicle pls 🙏
apologies as we had to make a lot of Corrections
@@Aitelly Never forget that
"no one is perfect"
Everyone make a mistake specially me😅
@@warfootage7890 , 😆 oh bhai
T 120 1981
An advantage of the Leopard compared to the Abrams is that infantry can easily take cover behind the Leopard, whereas the Abram's gas turbine is much hotter when the tank is moving (when it's stationary it's ok though - but following the tank at walking speed can already be quite exhausting). However, the Abrams exhaust will not melt your face or set you on fire - that's a myth.
... the Abrams' * gas turbine ...
The Advantage of standing behind an Abrams as an infantry unti compared to a Leopard is getting warmed up in cold weather conditions. 😂
Nice video. I will note that there is one inaccuracy with the tank's steering: If the controls were turned to the left or right, the tank would move around a circular path instead of moving in a straight line.
Thanks Ivan for your feedback 👍
We love you guys 🙏
@Aitelly You are welcome. Sorry for the late response. I would advise checking for this inaccuracy in your other tank videos, too.
The Leopard 2 is propelled by the MTU MB 873 Ka-501 engine, 90° V-block 12-cylinder, twin-turbocharged and intercooled, liquid-cooled diesel engine and very important with multi-fuel capability….. Diesel, gasolin, mixture of diesel and gasolin
I didn't realize until watching the video just how enormous the gun on the 2A6 looks compared to the older models, shame you didn't cover the newer Leo 2 tanks like the 2A7v
The leopard 2A6 is not enormous at all with similar size as older A4. The physical difference are the L55 gun, additional armor & CITV. The largest leopard is the A4 evolution bought by Singapore & Indonesia army. Author left out the risk of ammo stowed next to driver which would end up disastrous. Leopard 2A6 armor is inferior than Challenger 2 & M-1A2 by the way. We'll get to see how leopard 2a6 fares over Ukraine later on
@@jayjay53313 man I meant only the gun I know the 2A6 ain't much bigger, it's basically the same as 2A5. I meant the gun
@@gn0me420 ahh.. I see, you meant L44 vs L55 main gun. Noted
Seen one at an military event a few years ago, personally they look beautiful and terrifying at the same time, they are much bigger in person than what you see on TV 😎
A very good unbiased summary most people do not include it's pros and cons tbh that's why some people think it's a bit invulnerable which is kind of not true any tank facing any modern digital ATGM will be at danger whether it is Russian or NATO. The development of Top exploding missiles makes every tanks frontal armor useless as it literally penetrates from the roof. Also thanks for explaining the limited vision some people ask why other leopard variants have optics on the wedge armor like the PL version well that's because the wedge armor actually reders the the places covered by it unable to put an extra sensor or optics which is why all the sensors and optics and sensors of the leopard are put on the roof on with a 360 rotating lens and sensors.
Glad to hear from intellectuals like your selves.
We realised that we learned more from this community than all the books we read.
Thanks again 🙏👍🙏
Ultimate informative video, salute to your hard work
Thanks 🙏👍
Why did you put the panther turret on the tiger chassis?
This channel is truly amazing ❤️
Thanks 🙏
Горит этот "леопард " как бумага
👍👍👍
Or Zippo lighter
So do T90s.
10 million dollar tank to be taken out by a 50k drone.. thats priceless lol 😂
None of them got burned by drone. Get your facts right
@@robberhans9307 lol all of them got burned by lancets
@@cynicalsuka2463 not all of them . Lol the lancet can't burn a tank but can disbanding it so what's your point?
I love your detailed videos!!! Please do one of the K-2 Black Panther
The company that makes the Leopard's cannon is Rheinmetall. Rhein (Rhine in English) is Germany's biggest river, Metall = metal. It is of course a German word, thus not pronounced "Rain Metal", but "Rhine-Meh-tull".
The Russians say leos burn well
Рососіянці тільки ПОШКОДИЛИ 10 танків, не знищили, та вже вони зремонтовані та на війні
But the T-90 burns better
@@cosasdetanques007That's why you're burning under every comment where they say that leopards are burning
Watch how the tank worked in Syria in video “Kurdish female fighter destroys Turkish Leopard tank”when a girl hit one with a Russian ATGM when that happens the extra ammo in the hull blows the turret and the front of the tank off and it looks like a small airliner hit the ground and exploded probably the largest vehicle explosion I’ve ever seen.
wow in blender, fantastic work!
Really nice video. Love German engineering!!!
2:15 Rheinmetall
3:49 Rheinmetall you misspelled :P
Alot more misspelling in the video I lost count of them
Did you know I stayed at a Holiday Inn last night and watched a social media video about how a NATO tank works. I feel better equipped now and re-assured with the knowledge I need, to be keyboard warrior tank expert now and engage in OPs where I can weigh in with my new found expertise on this topic. Thank social media for making ME, a Leopard 2 (in a vacuum) expert.
haha good one
@@Aitelly :p,
Props on the video, it was well done.
Very informative. I hope you can add the Israeli Merkava in the future.
Yes for sure we have the 3D model
Мультики - это конечно хорошо. Вы покажите реальные бои, этого чудо оружия.
Ви вже показали , ми вас всіх уб'єм!
Скоро, на территории хохлостана в виде металлолома))
@@diversantvlg7099 Відшмокчи підор
До первого хохляцкого поля! Там увязнет и утонет.
По факту, пока я ток видел как они застряли в черноземье 😀🤌
This tank armor is air XD. Well. I guess "I'm f*cking invincible"
0:46 Made me laugh so bad that's so cursed
Nice Video! Leopard 2A7 is the best 3rd generation Tank a good combination of armour,efficient diesel engine,soft and hard active protection systen(APS) and a reliable 120mm smoothbore gun. All of this makes it a good tank. USA🇺🇲 & it's allies are best and greatest! Greetings from Canada🇨🇦.
Thanks 🙏👍
You think too much about yourself, in the end the Russians will humiliate you anyway, as always
The US have upped their game and brought the Abrams Sepv4 to modern standards too.
The British and the French are modernizing their tanks too now.
I just hope the Europeans increase their production capabilities. The industry has the capacity, but the political will is weak.
... its* allies (it's = it is)
Everytime this channel post new vid I'd always watch it first
Glad you liked it 🙂😊🙂
Definitely very accurate on 9:21
correction. the fins on an APFSDS are NOT there to make the round spin, rather they stops the round from spinning as a spinning movement would destabilize this kind of rodd shaped projectile
Is this true because an artillery Round was intentionally made to spin from the rifle Gun.
@Aitelly for an artillery round it true because it's not Rodd shaped like an apfsds round. And artillery round aswell as almost all the older gunshells from mid 1900s have more of an elliptical shape which will rightfully stabilize the shell with a spinning motion. It's all physics and the difference between an elyptically shaped round and a rodd-shaped round
Good work as always
Thanks 🙏👍
Unfortunately quiet a few things wrong. You guys mixed up data of the 2A6 and 2A7. The 2A6 weighs 59,9 tons like stated earlier and at the end it was suddenly 62 tons. You also stated the L/55 can penetrate (with apfsds ) only 450 mm RHA at 2000 which is wrong, modern rounds like DM63 still have over 760mm of penetration at 2000m. Furthermore the leopard 2A7V has multiple cameras and FCGS capabilities. So situational awareness is very good. The 2A7V also has an APU which makes silent operation with low heat signature possible. I’m surprised you didn’t come up with the classic ammo hull storage problem, which was made obsolete in 2007 when Rheinmetall developed new propellants which do not ignite when impacted with shaped charges or kinetic projectiles
Can we get a video on hal druve
It's indian helicopter series
You are getting views on Indian wepons just see your new uploades
Got a lot of Request on that let me research about it
@@Aitelly you can ask anything about it to me
@@Aitelly I am looking forward to problems in hal druve 😂 because according to me there are 0 problems in it
Well done. Great animation and solid information.
Glad you liked it!
ils brulent tres bien et leurs tourelles volent aussi bien que celle des chars russes
Na WWII falaram também que os blindados alemães eram melhores do que os MBT da Rússia, mas todos nós sabemos que não sobrou pedra sobre pedra dos carros de combates alemães.
Será que a história vai se repetir? Por que 80 anos depois, blindados alemães e russos voltam a se enfrentar em um campo de batalha, mas vamos ver se dessa vez a história será diferente para os alemães
Немецкие танки (тигры и пантеры) второй мировой войны и были лучше, просто их было ничтожно мало, поскольку они были очень дороги в производстве, в СССР тоже были такие танки серии ИС и КВ (очень дорогие но очень бронированные), но войну выиграли не они, а дешевые Т-34. Касательно Вашего вопроса: надо понимать что и Леопард и Абрамс проектировали для противостояния танкам СССР (танк против танка) и они не пробиваются в лобовую проекцию, тогда не было ни дронов-камикадзе и не было наводки артиллерии по камерам дронов. Сейчас всё это есть, бить будут в крышу, крыша Леопарда или Абрамса не выдерживает удар. Именно по этому сейчас в США разрабатывают маленькие слабые беспилотные танки, они уязвимы но они дешевые и их можно сделать очень много.
Os tanques alemães (tigres e panteras) da Segunda Guerra Mundial eram melhores, apenas eram insignificantes, porque eram muito caros de produzir, na URSS também havia tanques da série IS e KV (muito caros, mas muito blindados), mas não eles venceram a guerra, mas o barato T-34. Em relação à sua pergunta: é necessário entender que Leopard e Abrams projetaram para resistir aos tanques da URSS (tanque contra tanque) e não penetraram na projeção frontal, então não havia Drones kamikaze e não havia artilharia apontando para as câmeras dos drones. Agora tudo isso está lá, eles vão bater no telhado, o telhado de um leopardo ou Abrams não pode suportar o impacto, é por isso que os Estados Unidos estão desenvolvendo Pequenos tanques não tripulados fracos, eles são vulneráveis, mas são baratos e podem ser feitos muito.
@@modronmk2289 o T-34 surpreenderam os alemães com a sua blindagem frontal inclinada, aonde os projéteis alemães não conseguiam perfurar, além do mais, possuíam lagartas extra largas, ou seja: foi uma grande inovação para a época
@@helton676 The pz1, pz2 tanks, which were obsolete at that time, and the early version of pz3, did not penetrate this armor. All subsequent tanks pierced this armor from two kilometers.
is this the variant that just got destroyed in recent action?
Very nice video ! Can you do a video for the Leclerc Tank ? Thanks !
Cool videos the only thing that I would like to see added is real footage i.e. footage of weapons tests & combat video if it's available. That would make ur videos A+
Amazing job for bringing such unbiased and objective content ❤
There are so many channels which should take an example. And yes I talking about you, Infographics Show 🤮
Guys can make a video about the Pantsir S1?
Here in Germany we would call this air defense system a "Eierlegende Wollmilchsau" (="egg laying whool producing pig" or basically the jack of all trades how you would say in English language). Tor-T2 is also unique for combining radar and launch platform into one vehicle. It would be amazing to see content about those systems.
We really love the Gepard too will be realising it next week.
@@Aitelly lol actually I meant the Pantsir 😅. Would be interesting to get a little bit insight how the missile guidance works. However Gepard would be cool too. 👍🏻
@@Aitelly that's also include massive machine weapons for very short range air defence systems (SHORAD), one of famous Germany manchine, and also Pantsir S1/S1M its one of heavy machine SHORAD ,
well i loved to mix it between east and west, 😅😉👌 , Bravo AiTelly
@infographicsshow
4:30 the 2a6/2a7 with its best apfsds, the dm53/dm63 round penetrates Up to 800 so probably around 700mm at least from 2000 Meters range, 450mm Penetration would be more realistic with older apfsds rounds Like dm33 or dm23
... its* best APFSDS (it's = it is)
My Bad, thanks for the correctoon
Nice video 👍 The Leopard has also ammunition storage in the back of the turret with a blast door and blow up panels to protect the crew. Which type of Tiger is it in the comparison?
What do you mean
@@thefrenchbaguette919 In this video is only the ammo storage in the hull mentioned, but the interesting storage solution in the turret isn't.
@@Dappy666 ok
@@Dappy666 I mean the the tiger part
@@thefrenchbaguette919 At timestamp 0:47 It looks like a tiger hull with a panther turret.
Will you guys also do an explanation about the Kf51 Panther? (If more information is out about it)
You should know that russian T-90s tank has got a laser irradiation sensors, and it means that if Leopard2 will try to determine a distance with laser rangefinder then T-90 will set an aerosol jam and the cannon of T-90 will be directed to Leopard2. There is no a silver bullet.
They're beautifully blowing up, send more pls.
@@ASS_ault No? I think he clearly talking about leopard tanks I guess
Spa ish version the Leopardo 2E by Santa Barbara Systems is another beast.
What happened to the leopard 1 tanks we had them in Australia until we replaced them with Abrams?
Уже есть реальное видео поражения леопарда ланцетом))) можете графику поменять на него)))
@@ASS_ault ну да, ну да...
Пусть сгорел, но не разлетелся в клочья же... Да?)))
@@ASS_ault ну, конечно, не сгорел и даже дальше воевать поехал аж на Москву, так и есть...
@@ASS_ault гуглом пользоваться разучился?
@@ASS_ault ну правильно, он же на Москву поехал) леопард же никак нельзя уничтожить, он - имба)
@@ASS_ault конечно, от смеха) дорогуша, ты думаешь, я каждому хохлу должен что-то объяснять и доказывать?) Так мне насрать на твоё мнение и то, что ты думаешь.
Это же просто понять даже по моим первым ответам тебе.)) Но ты упорно требуешь от меня чего-то.)))
Сказочный...
They put the fuel tanks in different places, and in the middle is the ammunition tank, and it is in the front of the tank. This is nonsense 7:19 This tank is a bomb
I hope that your episodes will be subtitled into Arabic in writing. This is because your content is interesting and will increase the number of your followers a lot. Thank you
One thing the ammo from the hull was removed on every Leopard 2 version. Armor store only in the turret now with blow out pannels.
It was after tests shown to risky to have ammo in the hull.
Fun fact the A7V could hit targets up to 5km with 65 kp/h and has a hit ratio of 99%.
Of course official data so you can bet its more then that.
Not at all it still there otherwise the Leopard would only be able to carry 20 rounds. 🤥
@@viceralman8450 yep new tactic and 20 rounds are enough.
No its not its no ammo anymore in the hull way to dangerous iv a round would pen.
@@michaeld.uchiha9084 No they haven't you have less than half the ammo the Leopard can carry, (just double checked and the turret rack can only hold 15 rounds) the ammunition you should have, that will more presure on logistics and reduce the operational range on the tank significantly, from 42 rounds to 15 what a bunch of nonsense.
very nice animations, the only drawback is the voice of the person who does the talking: he starts almost each sentence with a normal pitched tone, but at the end of that sentence the tone drops, and the voice becomes difficult to be heard.
Thnaks for the Feedback
I didn't find anything wrong with the narrator's voice or tone.
@@Joseph-eh4rs Thers is a saying “To avoid criticism say nothing, do nothing, be nothing.”
― Elbert Hubbard
Whenever we create any content it's normal for us to recieve criticism both constructive & destructive
Lancet! 👏👏👏👍😆
It would be nice to talk about the tactical pros and cons instead of comparing numbers. Lots of videos do that already.
MQ-9 Reaper..... It can be a very wonderful topic ,
And that makes me very curious . 🧡😊💫
Yes we can thinking of hiring more animators to get more videos out in the next 5 months.
Bro next please many types frigate, destroyer, diesel attack submarine, nuclear attack submarine, nuclear submarine, crusier, anti ship missile, ballistic missile, cruise missile, hypersonic avangard, aster 30 & 45, ICBM & SLBM, Rafael & Typhoon jet fighter, turkish kizilelma & Akinci. Finally I love your greatest intelligent video ❤️💛💙 . Love from Bangladesh 🇧🇩
Ok
Fantastic video!
Thanks 🙏👍
In my opinion, and I'm no expert, the Leopard 2 is one of the best tanks around at the moment. It's a beast 😎
The second best selling tank can't be bad.
So you're telling me three of the best tanks in the world have been knocked out by Russian shovels?
@@definitelyfrank9341 whaaaaaat? I don't have a clue what you're on about mate.
@@laernulienlaernulienlaernu8953 You haven't heard about the three Leopard 2A6s confirmed to have been lost by Ukraine?
@@definitelyfrank9341 still doesn't make it a bad tank. 3 tanks! You show me a tank that's been deployed to a battlefield that hasn't sustained a loss, or multiple losses.
Ammunition rack on the back of the turret?
Did you really show us a "tiger" with a panther turret... ?????
And now we know they burn like matches.
loved the upload ! the bg soundtrack was total ass distracting for my simple mind.
thanks for the Feedback
@@Aitelly ..no distrespect intended . love your work sir !
Stuff like Situational awareness doesnt really matter since doctrine requires Tank scouts to scout out an area first AND these tanks are not alone!
They are designed to fight with Marder and Puma IFVs and Panzergrenadier Infantry.
They keep the situational awareness due to that.
And the newer Leopard tanks are supposed to have Trophy systems and a confidential weapon protection, whatever the second means but that helps against most modern ATMs.
The issue i see is the same as with most other tanks, what can it do against missiles that come from above? Not much if the public information is correct but maybe the Kf51 is better in that regard? I didnt look into it but hopefully they worked on the Javelin issue.
Leopard looks so awesome even when it's in flames. 🔥😂
Two leopards burned anothers were disabled but what if they were russian tank?
Would you be doing any Naval warships?
Both Modern and past
Yes we can do it.
@@Aitelly 😃, nice
the more complete the weapon machine, the more subscribers, well submarines, aircraft carriers, LHD, LPD's, torpedoes, rocket naval, anti-ship missiles, coastal defense missiles, whoah.....delicious yummmmyyy 😉👌