Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. [SCOTUSbrief]

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 13

  • @marywill6287
    @marywill6287 2 роки тому +9

    The decision in this case is not about whether the speech is protected speech. Brittany is protected in expressing these opinions (no matter how profainly) because the speech did not take place at school or at a time when she was under school supervision. In Morse the Court upheld the school's authority over Frederick because the school was acting in a supervisory capacity in protecting the interests of the other students from Frederick's seemingly pro-drug pronouncement. They had no such interest in this case.

  • @Amokra
    @Amokra 2 роки тому

    Now they are allowed to do this if you say the wrong thought anywhere especially if it is college

    • @NithinJune
      @NithinJune Рік тому +5

      bruh this case was decided this year

  • @NPC-bs3pm
    @NPC-bs3pm 3 роки тому

    Settlements should always be mentioned in such cases (infringement of Constitutional rights📜).
    it isn't enough to say that the lower courts decisions were inaccurate when it comes to constitutional freedoms.
    it is not enough to say that "people learned their lesson" -end quote.
    What was the settlement? where was the retribution for EVEN A TEMPORARY⏲ suspension of liberties

    • @NithinJune
      @NithinJune Рік тому

      what, that's not how that works

    • @NPC-bs3pm
      @NPC-bs3pm Рік тому

      @@NithinJune It is not. There is no justice in the justice system.

  • @iKarrott
    @iKarrott Рік тому

    My right ear is lonely.

  • @soobderi
    @soobderi Рік тому +1

    4:13

  • @georgemason2495
    @georgemason2495 11 місяців тому

    love this shit👍