Joachim Trier, Renate Reinsve, and Anders Danielsen Lie on The Worst Person in the World | NYFF59

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 вер 2021
  • Director Joachim Trier and lead actors Renate Reinsve and Anders Danielsen Lie discuss The Worst Person in the World, a Main Slate selection at NYFF59, with NYFF Director of Programming Dennis Lim.
    As proven in such exacting stories of lives on the edge as Reprise and Oslo, August 31, Norwegian director Joachim Trier is singularly adept at giving an invigorating modern twist to classically constructed character portraits. Trier catapults the viewer into the world of his most spellbinding protagonist yet: Julie, played by Cannes Best Actress winner Renate Reinsve, who’s the magnetic center of nearly every scene. After dropping out of pre-med, Julie must find new professional and romantic avenues as she navigates her twenties, juggling emotionally heavy relationships with two very different men (Trier regular Anders Danielsen Lie and engaging newcomer Herbert Nordrum). Fluidly told in 12 discrete chapters, Trier’s film elegantly depicts the precarity of identity and the mutability of happiness in our runaway contemporary world. A NEON release.
    To learn more and get tickets for this year's NYFF, taking place through October 10 indoors and outdoors throughout NYC, visit filmlinc.org/nyff.
    More info: filmlinc.org
    Subscribe: ua-cam.com/users/subscription_c...
    Like on Facebook: / filmlinc
    Follow on Twitter: / filmlinc
    Follow on Instagram: / filmlinc
  • Фільми й анімація

КОМЕНТАРІ • 24

  • @cinemalights2625
    @cinemalights2625 2 роки тому +116

    Joachim Trier has become one of my favorite directors. He makes the types of movies that I want to make in the future as an aspiring screenwriter and director.

    • @Mark-vs9by
      @Mark-vs9by 2 роки тому +15

      you can sure do as good if not better one day, keep your head up and keep working on your goal !! Good luck !!

  • @leadurand3628
    @leadurand3628 2 роки тому +6

    Joachim Trier is so moving!!! everytime he talks I wanna cry, he is so poetic.

  • @dandindan
    @dandindan 2 роки тому +22

    i love his explanation about time-stops scene :')

  • @kristinelizabethbarker3459
    @kristinelizabethbarker3459 8 місяців тому +2

    Anders Danielsen Lie is actually a medial doctor 😊

  • @kaungkhantthein5348
    @kaungkhantthein5348 2 роки тому +16

    Big fan of you Joachim. Love from Burma.

  • @connallycomedy5
    @connallycomedy5 Рік тому

    Beautiful film.

  • @feltomas
    @feltomas 2 роки тому +2

    18:36 what was this question?

  • @taufiqhariyadi
    @taufiqhariyadi 2 роки тому +2

  • @lotuslien774
    @lotuslien774 2 роки тому

    💜

  • @ggthewhale
    @ggthewhale 2 роки тому +9

    she's so incredibly gorgeous it's crazy. i'm down bad boys

  • @fernandasilva2552
    @fernandasilva2552 2 роки тому +28

    Shame...The actress was just allowed to talk after 10 minutes of interview, because the director made her a question. And she almost didn't have enough time to complete one sentence. And so it goes, with the interviewer ignoring her. Besides feminism, she acted so magnificently in the movie, she deserved much more.

    • @lilmilontiktok
      @lilmilontiktok 2 роки тому +2

      What💀

    • @bey3910
      @bey3910 2 роки тому +8

      there's a previous interview at the same venue with the same interviewer where she talked a lot. I think they're just trying to spice it up

    • @fernandasilva2552
      @fernandasilva2552 2 роки тому

      @@bey3910 Better this way! 😊 @Bey!

    • @lilmilontiktok
      @lilmilontiktok 2 роки тому

      Wdym besides feminism

    • @MrChaseBlue
      @MrChaseBlue Рік тому

      Uhh… in film festivals, the focus is on the director, unless the actor is really famous, which Renate is not.

  • @dr.bimbambula
    @dr.bimbambula 2 роки тому +1

    she puke again?

  • @upendasana7857
    @upendasana7857 2 роки тому +1

    I saw this film yesterday and have to say I was a little disappointed,I didn't think it was a masterpiece.Honestly I think far too much of a fuss is made over so many films and too much time spent talking about them.
    Her character was hard to like and hard to believe she was really supposed to be a thirty year old woman behaving more like a 20/22 year old quite honesty,she felt spoilt and indulgent.
    I don't think it was until the end that I really felt more emotionally engaged ..but then maybe that was the point of it..she wasn't particularly likable,she was kind of careless and it wasn't until her pregnancy and then the forseeable loss of her ex lover that I felt able to really care much about her

    • @markkiss9321
      @markkiss9321 2 роки тому

      I also think this movie was mediocre at best. Her character was basically non-existent, extremly dull and besides her apperance it's hard to believe why other men were so obsessed with her.
      I think with another less attractive actress this movie wouldn't be hyped at all.

    • @daniellomax2263
      @daniellomax2263 2 роки тому +16

      @@markkiss9321 Her character isn't dull, she is literally trying to find herself and her purpose in life, within the film. Her character is very easy to resonate with for many people. Secondly, the men in the film are attracted to more than her appearance; she has multiple scenes where she is flirtatious and bubbly. There are multiple occasions where she is outgoing and also fun to be around for others (dancing, chatting, laughing). Finally, I personally disagree with the remark that she is "spoilt and indulgent", she works in a bookstore and shares an apartment, not really a lavish life. If you want to see a spoilt main character, then watch "The Souvenir".

    • @varunvaidyanathan5929
      @varunvaidyanathan5929 2 роки тому +2

      @@daniellomax2263 Liked your response. The best rebuttal.

  • @narrml
    @narrml 2 роки тому +11

    It was honestly such a great privilege to watch this film an afternoon this week, through an LA Times preview, and this chance to hear so clearly from you persons involved brought a thought about why the experience felt so important.
    When you speak here, you each evidence an intelligence that it's seldom indeed to encounter in any public art. You present so through your presences in acting and story and scene in the film, yet it's an important confirmation, part of the whole I think, that you show such brightness of wit and consideration when asked to speak in the contexts of it.
    I had the thought that an actress might have been held back from parts, as was said, due to this in her case, but it should not often be held back, for what it offers in our world of so many sly and blurred expressions.. Why? For me, because this 'presence of the real' in a person is actually able to be taken up for its own presence in nearly anyone; and in that, to offer us the doorways and avenues out of the times we are in.
    And so you did, each of you and 'Eivind' as well, all of those present, in the gift of the film. Thank you.