This Mysterious Stone Structure Is Older Than Stonehenge
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 лип 2017
- Until recently, Britain's Stonehenge was thought to be the world's oldest set of stone monuments. But a recent discovery in the Turkish region of Gobekli Tepe has been estimated to be over 6,000 years older.
From the Series: Secrets: Garden of Eden
bit.ly/EdenSecrets - Розваги
Just keeps getting older and older. This should be enough for people to stop acting like we have any real idea about our ancient past.
Romans where on the verge of steam engines, humans are a civilization with amnesia
Couldnt agree more. Scholars act so pompous like we automatically understand everything and yet, (while I do believe we have strong grasps on what ancient life was like) we continue to underestimate our ancestors.
@@johnuthus don't forget about the Antikythera mechanism. incredibly fine tuned technology from 2000 years ago. who knows what else they may have had.
@@haikat4 that is true, we just lost knowledge not gained
we barely know what happened 500 years ago
It's amazing that those 10,000 year old videos were still playable.
Nice to see the right attitude here.
Sarcasm at its best 🤣
I’m trying hard to put 10,000 years in perspective. I mean, our age is a drop in the bucket.. 10,000 years ago people like you and I know were creating these magnificent structures. Amazing.
Exactly. We are closer in time to Cleopatra than she was to the construction of the pyramids!! It's hard to reference and reflect on time like that
We have artifacts made nearly 100,000 years ago which show that people were already highly cultured and probably had some sort of religion.
11000
i have read somewhere in religious book. it says there is numerous times when humanity was lost and found again. the moment civilizations loses the humanity part they came to destruction. humans are evolving to the point they could survive longer.
@@gauravmalhotra7607 civilizations before civilizations before civilizations lay beneath the slime of the ocean. - Abdul Baha, Some Answered Questions
In future we will find much older things. Greetings from sri Lanka
Now it's only time.
We just have to dig deeper
Hello Sri Lanka, from Colorado
No body will be here in the future n that's real soon there's a climate crisis happening n life on this planet will be nonexistent
Hello from America!
Just came from BBC and couldn't help notice the huge difference between the informational, quiet tones of the British and the sensational, almost selling-feel of the Americans.
"This is so FUN-TAS-TICK you'd think it costs a fortune, but YOU can get it for only 9.99 a month. All for you, only today"
Aaaaand you lost me at Garden of Eden lol. Amazing discovery though
Might have been a very sophisticated and talented people , the quality of the stone tools and leather work was probably stunning ! And created with great craftsmanship .
I hope the farmers get compensation for the land they have lost.
It wasn't really farm land no one was harmed
@@russelmurray9268 land is land bro
@@micheldesjardins9174 ? Huh
It's turkey, they didn't
How they know they hey didn't have wheel?
made up conclusions that fit the pre fixed dogmatic timelines.
No evidence bro that's it.
The earliest evidence of wheels yet discovered originates from 3,500 B.C. in Mesopotamia. Göbekli Tepe is some 11,000 years old (dating from about 9,000-8,500 B.C.). Thus the current consensus is that - unless any evidence of the use of the wheel can be found from Göbekli Tepe - they didn’t have access to it.
@@dr.spaghetti1973 - To me it seems like people who say the wheel was not invented yet have not spent enough time in the woods.
I lost interest and respect for this video when they said "with nothing more than stone tools". Still trying to push that original timeline even though ALL THE EVIDENCE now shows that the original timeline is wrong. You can't keep saying freaking Hunter gatherers built this stuff when it's clearly way too advanced. They obviously did not use stone tools. Whatever civilization built it did so with tools that obviously haven't been found yet. They've found ZERO evidence of any STONE tools at that site yet they assume it was built with stone tools because "11000 years ago man couldn't possibly have had anything but stone tools"
You have proof in the construction. There's evidence all over the Earth of ruins that are much older than what we "thought" man had created. It's being found all the time. Just finding the buildings makes the original timeline null and void. You can't still assume everyone used stone tools when the entire reason you thought that for so many years was based on a history that was like 6000 to 8000 years off.
andrew feuerstein my thoughts exactly! Wanted to throw my phone out the window when he said ‘stone tools’ 🤦♂️ so busy tryna make history fit into our paradigm we can’t accept that they had clearly discovered a form of technology that we haven’t yet
This channel is a farce. Misinformation will be Americans greatest downfall.
Don't buy into pseudo science. Everyone wants aliens, giants, or Atlantis. Reality is more interesting than fantasy.
@@michaelfisher7170 Atlantis is reality. There's more evidence to support it than to discredit it. It's just not what Hollywood movies and legends have made it out to be. It was likely a very real civilization that was destroyed in a flood or multiple floods. Putting Atlantis into the same category as aliens and Giants is silly. Human beings built the pyramids no need for aliens. Atlantis was very real it just wasn't some super technologically advanced civilization like some people portray it as. They were definitely more advanced than some civilizations that came after them. When a catastrophe kills off almost everyone and your knowledge is pretty much lost people have to start over. It's the most logical explanation for why the ancient ruins of huge hundred ton tons cut with near Laser like precision all over the world and then clearly younger buildings with worse craftsmanship for thousands of years afterwords. It's not pseudo science it's actual science. You really think we know everything about what man accomplished in the last 10,000 years? When people not long ago thought Mesopotamia was one of the oldest civilizations only because they hadn't found anything older yet. Places in turkey immediately change that and that isn't pseudo science. Oceans used to be 300-400 feet lower there's a landmass bigger than CHINA that was buried by the ice melting you honestly think no civilizations were wiped out or dislocated when that happened?
Absolutely agreed. There is enough evidence that points to us humans having civilizations older than the established 8000 years.
I believe that there are over 40 of these circles, all of different configurations, still buried in this area. There is also nearby, a full complex, again, still to be unearthed.
Why do you believe that? Do you believe the earth is flat, that Donald Trump won the election.
Your beliefs are of no concern to anyone but you. Shut up.
When you consider the level of sophistication in the carving and masonry at nearly 10,000 BC and then look at northern European megalithic construction (for the most part standing stones on end) 6000 years later, you wonder what happened in between?
Given that everything is obviously buried I'd say plenty happened in between it's just not been found yet because nobody is digging in the right spots. Or you can subscribe to the theory well there's actually evidence of it but the cataclysm at the end of the ice age that wiped out all the sea faring cultures that are now under 200 to 300 feet of ocean water all over the Earth.
@@ATFstein ahh yes the elusive sea peoples. they dressed their ships in blue, theyd wear blue clothes and they would appear out of nowhere; decimate a village, and disappear completely. Theres alot of lost history with that culture im sure
By my understanding the Holocene Calendar is based off of this structure. The calendar is based upon this structure appearing around 11,000-12,000 years ago.
That corresponds to the end of the last Ice Age and also the start of proto-history, but this place was only discovered a couple of decades ago.
To connect these people to the Garden of Eden is quite a stretch, to put it mildly!
I believe they're implying that this structure implies the region in which it was built had some sort of significance to hunter gatherers, and thinking about what they would have considered important to them, that probably meant lots of available food and water, which could be the root of whatever inspired the concept of Eden in the early myths that would evolve into the book of Genesis.
@Colin Thisaname The biblical stories are retellings of Sumerian stories which go back at least 6000 years, possibly more to the culture that predated them in the same area.
Imagine what lies waiting to be discovered offshore. During the last ice age so much of earth's water was locked in glacial ice sheets that sea levels were 150 feet (50 meters) lower than now.
When you consider that even in our modern age most large cities, and most people, are located within 150 feet of sea level, it makes one wonder how much of human history took place in lands that were fertile lowlands for thousands of years, but which are now under the sea.
Yes, I've often thought that. Add to that the "racial memories" of floods and atlantises, I suspect it was a very traumatic time. And certainly favored/forced migratory humans.
we might never discover what was underwater, but i am sure there was something under the sand of sahara desert tha are waiting to be discovered, because the sahara was green/forest 10.000 years ago. and a youtuber (bright insight) already discovered that atlantis is on the northwest of africa. the eye of sahara in mauritania fits the description of atlantis described by plato
It’s weird to think about how the time between when this was built and Stonehenge being built is the same amount of time between Stonehenge and today
Went to read the comments but there were only two.....
Silly! How can you say it is the oldest ever built? You once said that about Stonehenge. What you should say is, 'the oldest stone circle found so far'.
I love how whenever they find something older they call it the oldest EVER built. Probably because they don't want us to believe in anything older than that cause it would cause too much commotion.
@@ATFstein I think that is bit of a stretch. I do think that the facial razor consortium controls production of documentaries of prehistoric. They want us to believe that people who had only stone tools shaved their faces, wonder if the ladies had brazilians. This is done to instill a false idea that shaving is good so as to keep us buying their products that go against nature.
@@timan2039 wow so what youre saying is this is all a very cleverly disguised Gillette advertisement? xD nice joke bro, i almost took you seriously
@@SevenPr1me 😇
@No freedom censored and you do?
Haven't seen one comment saying "Everybody is an archaeologist now."
Bravo humanity we've done it!
Garden of Eden? Choice meat cuts implies hunter-gatherers?
Maybe wealthy oligarchs stayed at the temple and took the best cuts of meat?
Or it was sacred and only the best cuts were eaten during holiday celebrations?
Eden is under water. The Gulf sea.
The work of Graham Hancock brought me here. The people who built this structure were highly intelligent people with high standards of living. They adorned themselves with beautiful jewelry and lived plentifully. They had knowledge of the implementation of stone and fire, possibly basic forms mechanical engineering. Our great ancestors. These were real people. People who we owe it to to continue digging and excavating so as to preserve our past as a united species.
If you look in my trash, you will find the bones of the choicest parts of the animal. Good to know I'm part of a hunter/gatherer society.
There weren't many supermarkets around 10,000 years ago.
Mike Regan , butchery, then as now, did not always occur at the cooking site.
@@builditonce agreed. obviously we aren't hunter gatherers. as for the animals being wild (so they think) perhaps there were religious reasons for feasting on wild meat. in our own society I know individuals who boast of eating no meat they didn't hunt.
is it possible that maybe they had yearly migratory, of prey or plant cycles or something, paths to follow and this was somewhere they came back to seasonally? Like, maybe, this was something comparable to birds nesting grounds, now this is a very loose comparison but it was one that would illustrate the concept well. This was somewhere humans, maybe even multiple groups in an area, returned to seasonally. and perhaps it was a kind of cultural center? Humans do have a history of intermingling between groups. Now, I'm not a scholar so this could all be silly, I'm just curious.
I mean, if people can wonder about it being eden then I figure my musings aren't too wild.
and by plant cycles I mean, maybe they and or their prey followed a seasonal plant schedule, ripe over here this time, this is best at that time, snow is less in this area kind of thing.
it's also relatively far south so maybe it was more hospitable in winter, but who knows, I don't, that's why I'm writing this as a youtube comment and not a thesis paper.
I like your idea, it sounds like a plausible, at least partial, explanation. Imho, these people were probably in an intermediate stage between traditional hunter-gathering and full sedentarity. Agriculture did start in this area, as it was exceptionally rich in natural resources and conditions to favor it. What"s new here is the finding that such a group effort (enormous, involving hordes of people) predates the founding of the first small settlements (associated with agriculture) which by themselves still didn't have the numbers to undertake such an effort.
@@EmmaSpAce111 Agreed. It makes sense that nomadic migratory patterns might bring a large number of tribes together at a site with lots of food to support them while they prayed/preyed/played. Add a little fermentation to the festival and I can even imagine competition amongst the young and strong in the slow, year-by-year, building of the structures.
The wooden posts at Stonehenge are twice as old as stonehenge.
Wow, this was extra hammy. More of what I would expect from the "History" Channel than the Smithsonian. And the almost random mention of the garden of Eden at the end is more appropriate to Ancient Aliens than a museum dedicated to hard science.
I actually got mad at that last line. All my respect for the Smithsonian has dwindled down to nothing in a matter of seconds.
You know that feeling when you are looking dirpectly into the face of stupidity ?
You have also met Americans then. This is one of the top universities. LOL
Could the stone structures be part of their worshipping of their Deity? My thought when I heard that the structure in Turkey was at least 6,000 years older than Stonehenge was that this "religion" existed for at least that amount of time. It was before recorded history, so we'll never know. Fascinating.
Anyone scrutinized the C14 tests?....seems contamination might have been an issue.
Bones from rich cuts of meat = hunter gatherers.
Imagine if a dam broke and buried a steakhouse in mud. 10K years later, some future archeologists digs up the bones and declares - “the early 2000’s was an age of hunter gatherers!”
I agree with other comments. Please, longer, greater depth less of the sensationalism (it's already amazing)
Nice work
The word “Gobekle Tempe” sounds amazing
Outside Tempe, Arizona.
Why do most roads and infrastructures built by ancient people still exist today? While ours, with just a hit from the earthquake or caught on fire, would immediately fall or burn down? 🤔🤔🤔
Hmmm good question
Perhaps there weren't many earthquakes back then than we have now
And the human population has exploded. So fires are more bound to happen.
Just a guess
Thank you. I am just amazed with the ancient engineers and architects. I think the materials they used at the time were pure than today. Materials for infrastructures today were adulterated. 😔
I am not so sure hunter gatherers were the ones who built this structure. If you watch some other complete programs on Gobekli Tepe you will find out that not only was it built 10,000 years before the christian year "1" but later they completely buried all of these buildings - why? Did they know some kind of future catastrophie was coming like a comet or something else? Hunter gatherers might have been the workers in the construction but who planned and designed it and why?
How big is this place? Will google. Very Interesting.
There’s always gotta be someone
Who does something first. Maybe it was them who started settling in one place first and others followed?
They know that that's where settling first happened (in the Fertile Crescent) with the advent of agriculture. What is stunning, is that this site well started Before any trace of such settlements or domesticated plants or animals.
Why couldn't gobekle tebe just be a meeting place where different interrelated family groups met up and celebrated, shared knowledge, traded and conducted sacred rites. The Australian Aboriginals did this long before this place was built. They had bora rings used for such purposes.
The way he can steadfast declare that no tech was used is misleading.... It irritates me that they know that we used tech amd yet he speaks as if science is 110% sure and we know that we didnt know....
4:12 IDK
They dont really know how old stone henge is yet
This too
Does radiocarbon dating vary depending on how long teh artciles were buried during The Flood?
Why does it have to be one or the other? Why can't you have hunters and farmers in the same area? Or different tribes/clans coming together to work on this construction? Each one with different skill sets like Native Americans: Aztec, Inca, and Mayan societies having both farmers and hunters.
where is that mock up of gobekli tepe built?
The art depicting animals means that the builders have seen those animals
“Hello I’d like to order the full Ancient Aliens package. Now that includes the narration, background music and editing?”.....”Good good. What about suggestive links to nephilim? Good good. Though is it possible to dial it down just enough so we have plausible deniability? We don’t want to immediately transition to Ancient Atlantis Aliens. Is there an option to gradually degrade ourselves into click bait?” ...”Yes exactly! A 12 month program towards ridiculous hairstyles. Though since the Annunaki market is saturated is it possible to substitute that with something like....let’s say smurfs or possibility a Jedi based deriative?”.....”Awesome. Hollow earth psychics Vikings. genius! Could you ship that overnight? We’d like to start degenerating into the History Channel right away.”
I'm slightly lost reading your comment. Basically, I don't understand it period. But id like to. You seem very intelligent and you word things differently. Even though find it dificult to understand, I like that, and well, I guess that's that.
Very genius hilarious but truly good way of expression. This people know it very well this are Annunakies The fallen sons of God's cities..
@@angelous7774 you do realize that they were also-rans called "Annakim," or "Annakin?"
@@FairelightSilverwing But i have the HIGH ground annakin, so whats your plannikin?
@@bumblebee0369 the descent from science channel to pseudoscience channel, like The History Channel once was good...
We obviously don't know enough about their sophistication and technology.
Man, ancient hunter gatherers were chillin by the fire enjoying some of the freshest barbecue. I’d like to know more about prehistoric man’s culinary taste. Did they season their meat? A little salt goes a long way!
They probably didn’t because spices mostly became to be used when you where storing food for extended periods like salt production needs settled society
The Garden of Eden was many millions of years before this find at Gobeke
no the proper thing to say is that it is the oldest so far - if we have learned anything it is that archaeology is almost always wrong
From Stone age to building megalithic structures
That's like going from discovering the circle wheel to building the latest iPhone 7
No
megalithic structures are rock....stone. Just...big ones. "Lets put them into a circle" isn't that great a leap in thinking.
@@michaelfisher7170 LOL i laughed. i love deadpan and blunt logic like that
@@michaelfisher7170 yeah no wheel or technology whatsoever “ let’s arrange these 50 and 100 ton blocks accordingly and hey, let’s put the heaviest BOULDERS on top “ yeah very simple thinking and execution of said thought 🤦♂️
@@superbuu122 yeah. manpower was sufficient. And they weren't bereft of tools or technology it just wasn't turned out of a factory like it is today. They weren't dumb, they knew how to organize and they knew what they wanted to accomplish. And they did.
The Garden of Eden is at the center, GET THERE.
What’s the name of the place again ?
These guys are gonna get tarred and feathered pretty soon for misleading everyone .
Sir, then you please enlighten us
I down voted because you try to paint a picture of hunter gatherers building this massive monolithic city. Just be honest. "We have no clue who built it or why, and its older than any known structure in out written history completly destroying everything we thought we knew."
what do you want to bet that the archaeologists themselves wonder who writes these scripts.
Not to mention there probably some added deliberate lies in the narration to make you think a certain way.
We don't know what the people ate that built it only that someone ate there during it's time
It would be a bummer to these scientists studying this ancient architecture to have to consider the possibility that these people who lived thousands of years ago were smarter than they are today. 😂😂😂
I like it if it was longer i lick to see more thank's
i am sure there was something under the sand of sahara desert tha are waiting to be discovered, because the sahara was green/forest 10.000 years ago. and a youtuber (bright insight) already discovered that atlantis is on the northwest of africa. the eye of sahara in mauritania fits the description of atlantis described by plato
Correction " ever found " not ever built.
Ah, the Experts! I have books 130 years old and they all have one thing in common:
At least 2 sentences and up to a couple of pages, as to how archaeologists were being stifled and unable to correct those who had created a "TIMELINE and ACCEPTABLE NARRATIVE".
They had harsh words for those who had put their fingers in their ears and refused to accept that MAN just emerging from a proverbial stone age, who had no higher education, and who were trying to just survive and scrape out an existence on the land...
In no way decided WORLDWIDE & ON EVERY CONTINENT, to quarry out the heaviest Stones they could find possible, cutting into the sides of mountain stone, and polishing granite to perfection, carving intricate symbols, moving those stones 50-300 miles (as documented); to set them on a single earth grid line as to align them around a massive planet, and then use HIGHER MATHS SUCH AS GEOMETRY and TrigoNOMETRY to construct them... _Such as the base of the pyramid not only equating the size of its base to earths circumference but incorporating the moons dimension and distance; even pi!_
Why are INTELLECTS so ignorant?
Rewrite the books, admit the truth. They were far more advanced then we give them credit for.
Can you save Info to it
your videos are great.very knowledgeable.
They try to say civilization goes back only about 2000bc, and we were animals likely evolved from apes. We know they were hunter gatherers but does that make them a different species or cavemen?
Göbekli Tepe Center of the Türks
In Göbekli Tepe, the Turks have Kün-Ay and EB drums, there are 8 of the 12-animal calendars on the T-shaped obelisks, there are countless Turkish traces, especially the Khakasia Turks and Scythian Huns and Turkmens. The Turks made the Stonehenge and the Ring of Brodgar, which are arranged like Göbekli Tepe, as evidence of the Futhark Orkhun inscriptions around them.
Gobekli Tepe is absolutely not the most ancient construction on earth. No scientist is able to date any stone construction. They all gamble on the timeline of our history that stretches much furder back in time.
Surprised the Smithsonian even acknowledges it.
why would you be surprised? this should be good. whats the conspiracy theory you have here
Modern human has been around for 150,000 years. There are probably buildings that go back before Gobekli Tepe that are yet to be uncovered or are forever lost to time.
C’mon really, hunter gatherers we’re on constant move? Not accurate at all. All great nations had hunting parties before grocery stores! People still hunt today and live in their comfy forever homes
Exactly, there “scientists” are just trying to confirm their own dogmas
@@Dogsushi42 oh look billy listened to JRE
Y’all all sound pressed that they mentioned the Bible!
So what? If they are inquiring about it, let them it’s their business. And YOU ARE still watching 😂😂
The Garden of Eden? For fuck sake, Gobekli Tepe has nothing to do with the Bible or the Garden of Eden. I had hoped the Smithsonian Channel would not stoop so low.
On the bright side, you will never again be disappointed by Smithsonian Channel, because you now know that educating the ignorant hordes is not their mission.
Exactly what I thought... smh
Smithsonian explores history. Mythology and other religious stuff are deeply rooted in history. Cities could have been formed and fought for over religion, like Jerusalem for example.
Dude, seriously. You arent really thinking this through all the way. All myths are simply embelleshed and decorated truths. Besides, Gobekli Tepe is very near where the bible claims the Garden was. It could simply be the inspiration for the myth.
They really assume these people were savages and idiots.... God what hubris we have
1:46 is that a NYC hat?
I always wanted to be a stone age hunter gatherer reenactor
Stone age people ate game there, big stretch to Stone age man built it.
Always seems something or someone was here further back than our dating methods are suggesting.
Man power and stone tools...Metal tools make way more sense. Today there are still people living in the stone age, so what does that mean?...many ages can coexist...
He didn’t mention that the entire site was buried in animal remains. The entire site!
3:43 the dinosaur is correct as some would have been on the Ark with Noah.
Wow
Another hundred years we might know the whole story
If you look at the pillars that were moved to the museum (in the beginning of this video) you can see that some of them have arms with their hands positioned over what would be the stomach. You can see the same thing on statues from South America all the way up to Mexico as well as the Moai statues on Rapa Nui (Easter Island) and even some statues of Buddha (just to name a few.) Some of those same statues also had beards which was strange because those who were native to the Americas and the inhabitants of Rapa Nui did not grow facial hair.
Isn't it also weird that in most megalithic sites the oldest architecture is usually the most complex and most precise? I believe that there was once a global civilisation that was possibly as technologically advanced as we are now if not more so. There are too many coincidences to believe otherwise.
Makes me think of that Chi Master John Chang who could generate an electrical shock from his stomach
Native Americans do grow facial hair and the coincidences can be easily explined by convergent thought, the representation of hands over stomach could be to show hunger or a place to relieve it and the simplest way to do it is found across a wide spread, there is absolutely no evidence for a technologically advanced global civilisation in the ancient past
I believe you watch the crackpot Graham Hancock too much. 😁
stone henge is closer to 350,000 years old. Go to Mario Buildreps video on Stone Henge and see how he dates the structure. By understanding Stone Henge you will see this structure In Turkey is several Hundred thousand years old
Did he say Garden of Eatin'? I hear they had a new menu!
same narrator / writers style as Oak Island
way too vague and tedious
unsustainable
there are numerous sites older Than stone henge.
Carbon dating is flawed. If I drop a banana inside one of the pyramids and somehow archeologists found them 2000 years from now they would probably date them to be close to 2000 years old. I honestly think most of these ancient ruins were abandoned tens of thousands of years ago and a group of people found them and built their city around them.
I find this too sensationalised. It does not literally put ojr ideo of how people lived in the stone age on its head, it does revolutionise it for sure, but its not like this finding proves more conplex societies could existed before. If anything it just places a data point on our previous idea of the development of complex societal systems, extending it a few millenia further back in time.
Don't get me wrong, this finding os monumental, it's just not that bombastic. Also may I remind you prehispanic mesoamerican cultures managed to create vastly complex cities and nations, pyramids, canals, dikes and waterways using only stone against stone. The only difference is that they had millenia to perfect the use of stones and knowing which stones to carve with, with which shape and technique. So this is a further point to the case that if Gobleki wasn't the first society of its scale and development, the it most likely it was one of the first.
Then again, anything carved in wood would've rotten away without leaving any trace so...
Garden of what? That was only 6,000 years ago(according to the book)
Hello from Albania illyria
4:20
Obviously not Eden. There were more than 2 people. It might be to the east of Eden.
Well, you tell US, DID IT ?
Why add in that last sentence? It has nothing to do with the bible
They're implying that the city might have served as the inspiration for the Garden of Eden story. Abstract thinking isn't everyone's forte around here I see...
theproplady you clearly don’t understand how archeology works, you let the evidence take you to conclusions not force your religion onto findings
Matt Tarrant guesswork can lead into something. Just using imagination similar to writing a story or painting. Could always lead to something good so why not?
Thanks to the old testament we have located
Mount Ararat
Nineveh
Ur
Babylonia
and many other ancient sites while many archeologist and morons like yourself denied these places for years
SOOO STOP COMMENTING IGNORANT CRAP About the accuracy of the old testament. It has survived for thousands of years. You will never write a book that survives the test of time
@@carlosa.n5100 You can talk when there's proof that dinosaurs existed along humans that isn't made up, you have no idea how much of the book has been purged and rewritten for the sake of it being popular
I always new that scientists had it all wrong, this proved it. With we had time jumping avalibity
you always knew the scientists were wrong? Wow thats amazing, why didnt you publish your research and get a nobel prize since youre so much smarter than scientists?
Smithsonian have no idea of the age of Stonehange.
this is not new news...
I got to 1:23 then stopped, these people were not cutting these pillars with rocks. Please have some respect for our ancestors.
Aliens...
What if you have a wrong theory about by their tools
Was the animal meat used as offering before cash ????
Probably not in the sense that we know it. The priestly caste kept themselves fed through offerings throughout the year...passing the plate, so to speak. Large gatherings/festivals would be a sort of wealth distribution for everybody else...everyone gets some meat.
I thought Sumer was oldest civilization in world.
Oldest sedentary/agricultural, perhaps.
Oldest found.... YET