Painting characters EXACTLY as described in the book... Pt.2!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 жов 2022
- 🥳 Get my ULTIMATE Digital Painting Bundle/Brushes! www.jazzastudios.com/pages/shop
--------------------------------
✨support me on Patreon: / jazzastudios
🖌️ GET MY APP, BRUSHES, MERCH and MORE!
➨ www.jazzastudios.com
--------------------------------
JAZZA'S OFFICIAL SOCIALS! - Follow/Sub ↴
▶ TikTok: / jazzastudios
▶ Instagram: / jazzastudios
▶ Twitter: / jazzastudios
▶ Facebook: / jazzaofficial
-------------------------------- - Розваги
🥳 Check out my BRAND NEW - ULTIMATE Digital Painting Bundle/Brushes! www.jazzastudios.com/pages/shop - your support means the world to me!!
HOW IS THIS IS 2 DAYS AGO
@@Cold_hotmanyoutubes drunk again
PLEASE make those brushes available in Russia! Currently I only know XSOLLA to work with international payment! Plz I'm crying...
I really like the Harry Potter characters could you please do professor moody and lord Valtimort or maybe even Dumbledore
Do these brushes work on Corel Painter?
For Edward, it seems like there was a mix of descriptions because his eyes definitely weren't blue-green as a vampire. I recall them being described as liquid gold but they turn black when he hasn't fed in a while. Maybe the blue-green was when he was human? In which case it makes sense. His skin is definitely pale though
Yeah the person who sent the description totally didn't get it right. lol 😂
Yeah, the blue green was strange, because I know his human eye color was never described as blue green, just green.
@@laurendubosky Yeah, they even got the description of his human eyes wrong 😖 whoever wrote this description they clearly are not a Twilight fan because I read the books years ago and I still thought the description was off 😅 and I looked at Jazza's final art and I was like that don't look shit like Edward Cullen lol 🤣
By the way do either of you got Instagram so I can follow you? I want to make Twilight friends lol 🤣
To be honest I was thinking more Archie from the comics not Edward Cullen. I also read the books years ago and the discretion given is not right at all. Some parts but the eyes are definitely wrong.
Love how the challenge was to draw the "perfect" teenage boy and you drew yourself haha
Ikr hahahah 🤣
ROFL Yes!
Where was this draw?
@@pedro6720 the drawing of Edward
that was the joke well done, you don't have to tell everyone u found it funny..as it was a joke....
For Edward, you were given the description for when he was a human. Once he was changed, his eyes were first red and then honey-colored as he began drinking animal blood. His features were also sharpened and his skin paled.
He's fictional.. get a life bruh
@@NOOBCRASTINATOR69 bruh what? They just explained the difference lmao why are you so triggered 💀💀goofy
Oh that explains it! That is a good memory.
So, the movie depiction IS accurate to some degree.
@@NOOBCRASTINATOR69 Okay, and?? Do you think before insulting people, or are you really just that mean? I get this is the internet and a lot of people get "brave" enough to disparage others because of the anonymity, but I am genuinely curious if you're this rude to people who are physically right in front of you. Either way, shame on you.
I took maybe a minute of my life to interact with the creator about content that I really enjoyed, and you decided to spend your time insulting me for it. It looks like its you who needs to get a life.
Knew Sherlock almost instantly. He was always described as 'gaunt and eager' which is just such an odd pairing so I always remembered it. Watson always described Holmes so beautifully as if he were an angel
Yeah, I have no idea who Count Olaf is but to me the description was pretty clearly Holmes.
I do know who Count Olaf is and I never thought it was him. I knew it was Holmes as soon as he started drawing.
Isn't he associated with a deerstalker rather than a cloth cap, though? That part would have thrown me (had I guessed Sherlock Holmes, which I didn't 😂).
@@suntrespasser9684 he is, but it's described in a few different ways over the series
@@suntrespasser9684 Apparently that’s just something popular from a play he was portrayed in and not his common fashion.
How about a new twist to this: let someone pick a celebrity and have them describe that person, then paint them following the description, show the picture to someone else again and let them guess who this is. Would love to see the results of that experiment!
I believe Drawfee have done something of the sort
@@pau_5435 Similar but not quite. Drawfee went more precise than that, telling the person drawing when to change things to make it more precise. I wish they'd had done it (and hope they do end up doing it) as described by Flomotion8000.
literally just described gartic phone lmao
im up for it
Literally started thinking of someone I could give a faithful vocal portrait and ended up desperate since I couldn't even depict my own parents I live with.
"You can see where I'm going with this"
No Jazza, we cannot 🙃
I knew it was umbridge from the curly hair part, I still don’t know if it is but I’m pretty sure
YES IT WAS!
I mean it was obviously Umbridge, and mentioning wizard cloak was also very direct, unless you've never seen Harry Potter, then it's understandable.
Everyone pretty much got it at the pink cardigan (unless you’ve never seen or read HP), when I knew was at the hair description with a bow, and it was obvious (if you’ve read the books) after the green tweed cloak with the green hat with flaps.
Exactly! Shame they didn’t go with ‘frog faced’😂
Your reaction to drawing Frankenstein’s Creature was hilariously similar to Frankenstein’s reaction to creating The Creature in the first place.
S tier comment
As a gothic literature fan I adore this comment.
He accidentally drew Corpsegrinder from Cannibal Corpse
That's exactly what I was thinking
What made the Monster in Frankenstein: The Modern Prometheus so terrible and terrifying wasn't just the grotesque appearance as opposed to the beauty that Frankenstein had planned, but the sheer intelligence of the Monster made him a sadistic and horrifying threat!
So, when he got to Edward, I saw his sketch and I immediately thought of Cedric Diggory from Harry Potter. They are the same actor so I guess I got some points for that, but I realized how similar the descriptions of Edward and Cedric are. Cedric is 17 years old and has brown hair. It said that Edward was described as soft I think, and Cedric is also kinda soft. Idk, I just realized that both of those roles are played by the same actor and they have some physical similarities.
That was a good guess. The only thing I thought of was Peeta Mellark but he's not described as tall I don't think.
I thought Cedric too, but they wouldn't have two Harry Potter characters in the same video, and then I sat there thinking until I thought "It's Edward"
Cedric was my second guess. My first guess was that older boy from Percy Jackson that ended up being evil but it's been so long since I've read those books that I can't even remember his name.
it's a little funny to me that both of them were described as soft and cast to Robert Pattinson, i don't see him as a soft person whatsoever
That’s interesting with the Frankenstein one. One thing they didn’t mention in the description they gave you (perhaps because it’s not said directly describing the monster) but Victor Frankenstein’s goal was to make an incredibly attractive person. Tall, long hair, bold features. So when the monster turned out horrific, it was in part the corrupted beauty (not just straight up hideousness) that made him particularly terrifying. Anyways, your monster was really neat! He wouldn’t have had a belly though, even being book accurate 😂
That concept does sound somehow more terrifying than just a straight up ugly monster
"I saw the dull yellow eye of the creature open. His limbs were in proportion, and I had selected his features as beautiful."
The book also describes his hair as lustrous.
Yeah, I remember the description as being beautiful but with weird eyes and jaundiced skin.
I remember this, but I just now am thinking, did Vicky intend to make a hot guy in a boastful way or a Rocky Horror way?
lynd ward made a woodblock print of Frankenstein and i think it is a much more accurate depiction of the monster
I was surprised I recognized Sherlock Holmes immediately from the description, since I've never read the books. Frankenstein's monster, while I never read that book either, makes more sense that I got it, because I've looked that up before.
I thought Edward Cullen might by Percy Jackson, so it shows how much I didn't read either character's books.
Edward is in the thumbnail it was pretty obvious which one he was describing but ok.
My highschool senior year English class named Frankenstein's monster Jorge. I mentioned that it seemed a little mean to call him a monster and my whole class latched onto it and spend days coming up with a name. We even got out teacher to call him Jorge, I be it on accident.
Glad I wasn’t the only one who thought Percy Jackson
Lol I was conflicted between Edward and Percy. What gave it away was "perfect". Percy is describes as troubled, so I would expect him to look like he's up to no good. No one would describe him as perfect appearance wise.
Yeah I also thought Percy Jackson because idk Edward just didn’t feel right even though I knew it wasn’t Percy
I vaguely remember the book saying that Harry thought Umbridge looked like a toad, that would have been a very important thing to add to the description because the drawing you made of Umbridge is a little different to when I read the book. Still a amazing job they all looked great!!
he did...also, now I see what people are saying when they say Rowling was obviously anti-trans because umbridge obviously looks like an unfortunate looking transwoman
Professor Umbridge was missing the tweed and it totally changed the era it felt like she was from. That lady looked more like a hobbit.
Also in the book she was described as looking like a frog
@@AtomLil Damn, sounds like he nailed it then
Honestly I agree with that but I feel like I really liked the movie version too
shes also described as a toad or frog
@@AtomLil That was the what defined her the most
That's going to be my new thing. Calling up random contacts, asking them an absurd question, saying "HA!!" and then hanging up without explanation.
I've read Frankenstein recently for school, and I love how cursed your interpretation was
the book description is way different from the pop culture, stitched together, with scars and neck bolts green zombie man. The monster's creator actually calls him beautiful
But then seconds later he is disgusted by his own creation and even later in the Book we learn that everyone who sees it is just scared and disgusted as well
@@quetzalcoatl9134 yea, you know, then the monster kills his family, gets mad bc everyone hates him and then they kill each other 😅😅
@@quetzalcoatl9134 yeah, it has to do with the creepy yellow eyes as far as I know, as well as the disturbing macabre nature of Frankenstein's monster's appearance
@@quetzalcoatl9134 I interpreted the disgust that occurs as being an unsettling feeling that culminates as you watch the monster and see that he is unnatural and just wrong. At first glance, he is beautiful; Victor took his time, and specifically chose each part of him to create something beautiful, but the creation of the monster is just inherently wrong, and deeply unsettles anyone that see it.
@@yvettenicole1266 yes, thank you, someone who's actually read the book
As soon as I read black hair, grey eyes and wearing a cloth cap, I instantly knew it had to be Sherlock. Jazza guessing Count Olaf and Ebenezor Scrooge made me start doubting myself a bit lmao
it was "a 'thin, eager face' with a long thin nose" that clued me in and "cloth cap and tweed suit" confirmed it and Scrooge got me second guessing the same as you.
It’s definitely SH, I didn’t have second thoughts. But the one he drew was more like the characters he thought…
I immediately thought the same xD
The description doesn't say anything about him having that goofy grin.
I thought the same initially, but the cloth cap threw me. I pictures what he actually drew, and thought it might be a Wodehouse character. But that would be a lot more obscure than any of these.
Yeah I feel like for the movie they're like "they have to know he's a vampire. He should look vampirish " but the book is more like "he should believably be able to pass for a regular highschool student."
To be honest, I studied Frankenstein to much during my studies and I immediately recognized the description. It is like the better-known passage of the book, so I had it when you said "black lips". Mary Shelley you're an horror Queen.
All I could think was goth shrek while he was drawing 😂
Same! But his influence on it when he drew him as "fatter" with a big belly threw me a lot. Like first thought was interview with a vampire, then F's monster. But He definitely added in some v important details that weren't voiced in the description.
same, the "victorian era" was a clue in for it too. :)
When it said yellow skin I suddenly knew
@@sarahvp2003 Frankenstein (s' monster) wasn't Victorian tho. The book actually was set in the 18th century
I am loving this series! It also makes me really curious how you would draw the Percy Jackson characters from their descriptions, so if you continue this series it would be really cool to see one (or more) of those.
i'm drawing Percy right now, lol.
I was thinking of Percy Jackson while he was drawing Edward
@@alessandrahayes8544 same. I said, if that’s not Edward than it has to be Percy! This video was so much fun.
Yeah I'd like to see Rick's universe after that disaster of a movie
I was thinking the exact same thing because that movie completely miscast the characters
the first character really reminded me of the pigeon lady from home alone 2, the colour scheme is so similar too!
I love the whole series, it's so creative and enjoyable to watch✨️
When you drew Edward and made the shorter parts of his hair darker, I- you can literally see in yourself next to your drawing, having the same haircut and since the hair is shorter and the skin is peaking through, short/buzzed hair appears lighter than longer hair, because it doesn’t throw shadows on itself.
I remember reading that Edward's description was based on Henry Cavill in his teen years 🥰
Well Henry Cavill wasn't a hottie in his teen years, he revealed in one of his interviews probably with Graham Norton.
@@shramanamondal4624 I remember that interview! But I believe the Twilight series was based on how he looked later, like in Count of Monte Cristo. He thinned out quite a bit by then, tho I would love to see what chubby Henry looked like 😆
Pretty sure he was based on Gerard way lol.
You just blew my mind, and my brothers who also love that movie. That's one of our family favorites and we never even realised that the kid is the same actor that we have New favorite movies from.
@Juno Antares YAAAAAASSS That's one of my faves too! I was also slow to catch on to who he was until way later. It didn't dawn on me until he did that Immortals movie and I never watched The Tudors 😅
These descriptions are missing just a bit that would've really steered you in the right direction more. Like Frankenstein's monster is specifically beautiful with overblown proportions because Victor was trying to create a beautiful creature and thought he succeeded until the monster woke up and uncanny valley sunk in. And Edward is most definitely described as pale indeed, with gold/amber/black colored eyes depending on when he'd fed.
Yeah! From what I remember reading, I thought Frankenstein’s monster was supposed to be muscular as well! He wasn’t working with very thorough descriptions
Ever notice how drawing from imagination brings gradient shading whereas drawing from a reference entails more random, naturally realistic shading?
I have long thought that it would be fascinating to see how people would illustrate Tolkein's work, uninfluenced by all the adaptations. This video is fun to see, even if it is with other well-known characters.
Have you seen his Balrog?
@@FoxySpartan117 No, I'll check it out.
Agree....I want to see all the charakters. ❤
I am far too pleased with myself for guessing Sherlock and Frankenstein out from their descriptions and the pictures Jazza drew, so well done there! You managed to not know where you were going and get the absolute correct vibe for these classic and oft-reinterpreted characters.
"You're not supposed to ___, but I was having so much fun that I just kept going" is some grade A wholesome. Starting the day off right
Honestly, my respect to Rob Pat for playing a character he hated lol
I love that you’re blindly drawing these characters from their book descriptions, they look awesome and exactly how similarly we’d imagine what they’d look like
This just turned into a challenge of how often jazza can mention his brushes in one video
That would be an awesome drinking game
I thought Sherlock right away and was so happy I got it right, I always pictured him nobler and less aged, but maybe it doesn't describe him like that.
Remember he’s a casual opium user, so that’s going to take some toll on his body.
@@dubbingsync opium and cocaine occasionally
@@dubbingsync Quite true, and his smoking habit isn't doing any favours.
@@dubbingsync loved the result, he definitely looks like someone who does copious amounts of coke lol
I think people today are just conditioned to think every protagonist has to be a tall, muscular Chad due to hollywood casting choices, when in fact many books were written with fairly average people in mind, and in reality most heroes are not supermodels, or they'd be modeling instead of hero-ing.
i love that i immediately recognized the description of the creature the second i heard “pearly white teeth” and “yellow skin”, so to see ur unknowing drawing of the creature is so fun to me, i love how you went about it it’s fascinating
it's the fact he makes the characters happy when most are stone faced
I'm guessing the last one is Frankensteins monster, based on victorian era and disproportionate body (which could just mean a longer torso or arms compared to expectations); but he's described as incredibly beautiful, eerily so. So I can be way off the mark.
Edit: woohoo I was right! hahaha. I think the part of unnatural beauty is missing from the description. He's supposed to give an uncanny valley sort of feel, even though he looks really good. Because Frankenstein wanted to create a "perfect" new lifeform, but it goes against the nature and ended up creating a monstrosity in a human shell. (I mean we can argue all day who the monster is in the books, but Adam looks the part)
Adam? I think the name of Frankenstein’s monster was Prometheus…
@@meganjaime7728 he didn’t have a name, originally at least
The monster never had a name because names humanise someone. The monster was constantly reminded he was no human. The name Prometheus is from the novels original name. The modern Prometheus in reference to the Greek myth of Prometheus who stole fire from the gods and gave it to humans.
@@coralhughes1920 It's been ages since I read the book, and for some reason in my mind I remember him calling himself Adam at some point...
Okay, I did a quick wiki (yes, shame on me), and it seems like he did say something along the lines of "I ought to be thy Adam" to Victor. I took it as a name.
@@easternhills1329 ah, I’m not far into the book so I haven’t seen that part yet. :)
I would love to see Jazza draw warrior cats based of either their book or wiki descriptions.
Keep up the great work!
ACCORDING TO THE WARRIOR CATS WIKI…
Lmao this would be so much fun XD
Yesss omg
Warrior Cats... Those books were my life when I was a kid
@@nalinikratzin9334 Same with me. That’s why I would love to see Jazza draw some of the characters
OMG YES!!!
I think people get Edwards looks wrong. Twilight is written from Bellas perspective and she was madly in love with him. So Edwards description was very tainted by Bellas positive opinion of him.
this is a very good point- unreliable narrators are such an interesting concept
vampires in that universe are supposed to be utterly beautiful to humans as a means of attracting "dinner". everyone in that universe found all the Cullens insanely attractive.
@@mxloverman2898 Well, all Cullens are very much above average (especially when you consider Edward is 17 (have you looked at actual 17 year olds?) but Belas exaggerated view of Edward is what I was getting at
And Edward didn't consider himself beautiful. He considered himself flawed and monstrous. The exaggerated features (given to make them more appealing to their meals) seen as groteqsue and embarrassing. When Rob Pattinson did the role, he read Twilight for Bella's "perfect" version. Then he read the draft of Midnight Sun for Edward's "flawed" version, then worked with a compromise that was found somewhere in the middle. Both in looks, composure, and personality, and character to find the real Edward himself.
@@HilaryPea Midnight sun wasn't even out back then, was it?
I think your creators missed the mark on Edward. Like all the vampires in the Twilight series,
Edward is described as being impossibly beautiful. At various points in the series, Bella compares him to the mythical Greek god Adonis. His skin is "like marble"-very pale, rock hard, ice cold, and sparkles in the sunlight.
Agreed!! I was thinking in that realm it could be Jasper but it came to me more a Cedric Diggory, funny that he plays that one as well lol
I have read the books and seen the movies. Not shames to admit it lol. But dammit VAMPIRES DON'T SPARKLE! 😂
@@KhaozVoid
They ✨ _singe and burn_ ✨
It was human version - with green eyes, that was depicted. Not his vampire self. But, it kept me and him guessing until the last minute because we both kept saying no, then scratching that guess only to go right back to it. But, through out, I kept Edward in the back of my head - but at the human version. The vampire version is repeated referenced, but the human version is rarely referenced, even in the books. So, I like that the human version was the one that was mentioned in the challenge. Something just little different, but still popular!
@@KhaozVoid Honestly, Vampmeyers don't sparkle, either. That is just how Bella described then, but she got it wrong. Or rather, Stephenie Meyer didn't specify correctly. However, she fixed it in Midnight Sun. The facets of their skin refract light, like a prism. With many colors bouncing off them, they actually looks like they are on fire. Refract, not sparkle, LOL!
Confidentially guessed Umbridge, immediately guess Edward Cullen but then the more I thought about it the less I was convinced, had no idea with Frankenstein’s mister which confirms what Jazza was saying, knew it was Sherlock, and screamed that it was Jazza till the reveal.. haha this was fun I love this series!
I thought the edward one was cedric diggory
I saw "pink" and "curly, brown hair" and immediately went *"DOLORES F U C K I N G UMBRIDGE!"*
@@jenniferwilcox7021 its the same actor
This video concept was originally done by lavendertowne a few years back. They're interesting.
i think they knew, they bassicaly copy pasted the thumbnail style lmao
@@alicemation it's even the same picture of edward lol
@@alicemation that's why I can't watch Jazza anymore. The originality is just gone
Notice that two a bit upset at least give inspiration credit to her
@@kittybun8845 idk, he's still fun to watch. his content is still entertaining i don't really care lol
Green and pink is a lovely colour combination!
i had an illustrated book of frankenstein in the fifth grade and the frankenstein’s monster in the book did indeed just look like an average tall guy with black lips.💀
He was 8 ft - so a lot taller than average.
Since you started doing these and she's been doing them for a while, I'd love to see you and Lavendertowne do a collab versus type video on drawing characters based on book descriptions. I think yall would work well together.
Oooooo! Yes! That would be so fun!
great idea!
I doubt because he still hasn’t shoutouted her
@@Boxofcare666 that's kinda disappointing tbh
I thought that that’s what this was? I saw the thumbnail and immediately thought of her videos lol
The Frankenstein one was very easy for me, mostly cause I recently rewatched a video on the original story. He's actually described as being generally fairly good looking, iirc, apart from you know, having yellowed skin and visible arteries and really creepy eyes. But his teeth and proportions are nice!
It was easy for me too because I’m literally reading and studying that book right now lol
In the Edward Cullen, The image with Robert Pattinson and the drawing, the drawing looks more like Jasper
Id like to admonish the team. They left out multiple key visual descriptors for both Umbridge and Edward. Also my mind kept jumping to Edward bc of the thumbnail, but i said "it cant be Edward, he doesn't have blue green eyes"
Umbridge is constantly referred to as "toad-like" in the books iirc
Exactly what I thought. Bronze colored hair seemed very specific to Edward, though.
Edward was once human. Presumably they gave the description of Edward when he was human, prior to his transformation when he was dying of Spanish Flu in 1918.
@@jaydenalexander7987that's what I thought too but what annoys me is if they wanted to go in the human direction, why would they do a "modern setting" and they also should have described him as sickly and not beautiful. His human body was sickly with green eyes (not blue green eyes) and he even described his nose as being uneven and lumpy. When he turned into a vampire he became the most beautiful version of himself. Yes it does kind of look like his healthy human version but the image described in the book about himself was not quite this. It's almost as if they blended the descriptions together.
part of it is that you drew pre-vamp edward, bc vamp edward IS pale and causes the uncanny-valley effect in humans bc of their general "otherness," "humans can tell that they're not" or whatever, and, particularly, vamps have either red eyes (human-eaters), black eyes (hungry), or gold/amber eyes (animal-eaters), human ed had the blue green, but that is from edward's (or Carlisle's??) own admission, bella never actually saw him and described him herself
And also it says modern setting which means whoever made the description messed up cuz if it was his human form it would be long ago. And the eyes were green not blue green. And he was lanky compared to his brothers but when Bella saw him alone she realized he wasn’t lanky. Whoever wrote the description got it off
Knew sherlock right off the bat. Just from the "gaunt, eager face and bushy eyebrows" part. Ive read ALOT of sherlock holmes stories 🤣🤣 guessed Frankensteins monster pretty fast too. I was surprised when you drew the belly being so big though, that threw me off for a moment and I started to wonder if I was wrong but I kept going back to the thin black lips part and just knew it had to be the monster. As a bookworm I really enjoy watching these videos and think it would be cool if this became a longer series
Same! The description screamed Sherlock to me 😀
I felt the same about how he added his own "rotundness" to Frankenstein's monster.
I quickly got the hint about Sherlock too
I felt like he did it to throw us off for catching on too fast cuz he guessed it right away and then realized if he did it would have to look more "classic monstery". Nowhere was described extra weight or a cartoonish vest and tiny buffoonish head- just a tall frame, obviously expecting proportionate sized head.
Same with Sherlock!!
Jazza started drawing handsome squidward for the perfect angular features, lol
Really captured the Holmes smile there. In the books is often described as "slightly unsettling to see him smile"
EDWARD turns into The BATMAN❤️!
It's only natural, isn't it?
Probably the only vampire that has turned into a bat that we all like 😂😂
I enjoy these sessions alot, the creative process and character....guessing.... is too fun. Great video and I'm not even at the halfway point yet.
Wow! I really like your art style! As someone who's always drawn outside in, so to say, I love watching artists who start with the base colouring and work their way out. It's a really interesting technique... I'd love to try it! I think you're very talented!!
But, whoever gave you the description for Edward missed the mark. They seem to be taking descriptions from when Edward was human and as a vampire. In the books Bella describes Edward (and the rest of the Cullens) as having pale white skin and golden eyes - with her descriptions for Edward's eyes adding more detail like liquid amber, and warm butterscotch. His eyes are green as a human, and he'd have a warmer skin tone too. As a vampire they are described as being "almost unnaturally white".... maybe your team thought those descriptors would make it too easy for you to guess who it was?. Still, it did a disservice to you and your version of Edward (Edward would never wear a letterman jacket)..... perhaps you could revisit Edward and do a second version that's more true to his vampire nature?
As soon as you said “pink cardigan” I immediately thought of Umbridge. I love it! Great work!!! 😁
Can you do a video with book characters adding details about their personality? For example, Umbridge is described as "irritating" in the book, and Edward is "distant". You could do it by using descriptions of their tones: Edward does not actually smile but "chuckle" (that word literally comes up 25 times per page). It would be so fun to see how the personality affects the appearance :)
As always everything came out looking amazing! For Edward, it looks like you got his human description from when he was 17 in 1918 :)
Apart from he only has green eyes as a human :(
Your Energy is SO contagious, mate. Beautiful work
He seriously needs to do this with Percy Jackson cause I would love to see that!
You painted the human Edward :P his looks before turning were described once in the series. Bella really wanted their kid to have his green eyes. But the after look was accurate in the movie lol
Hey Jazza! You'll probably never read this but I've been a big fan of yours since forever. I've been more of a silent watcher but I just wanted to acknowledge the hard work and effort you put behind your videos to make them entertaining for us. I really admire the fact that you stand by what you stand for, yanno. And just know that we support you and are always left amazed by your artistic abilities. :)
UA-cam Comments be like :
UA-cam comment be like:
UA-cam comments be like:
UA-cam Comments be like :
yes
Your Edward didn't look 17 tho. He looked like some 30 yr old larping as a HS student
We’ll his is 109 years old though.😊
Oh, so exactly how he looked in the movies lmao
Though* Use actual words.
@@-_Nightfall_- Well*
@@englishatheart yeah sorry it’s my autocorrect it does it all the time!
Watching this makes me realize how good of a drawer Jazza really is.
09:55 why am I seeing him draw handsome Squidward
Edit: Handsome Squidward Cullen
Looked at the thumbnail and title and thought it was a new video from Lavendertowne at first X)
The captain of redundancy captain here, please don’t have a sentence with “for a second” and “at first” in the same sentence please since both of them practically mean the same thing as the other
Me too!
Yes the thumbnail is very similar
@@tiaanvanrensburg1032 Totally, the result of a mistake I am constantly guilty of; not reading through what I’ve typed before posting :) Thanks for the heads-up, will edit!
Thank you, Jazza; you are bringing back my interest in what I used to love doing when I was in high school and that is creating great artwork. Thanks for bringing my passion back and showing just how cool and awesome artwork can be!!!!
It would be so fun to see you draw the character of Artemis Fowl! Especially since most of them are Irish mythical creatures!
As someone who mainly does digital it's so cool to see jazza digital paint! Digital painting illudes me so I'm low key taking notes
Did anyone briefly see handsome Squidward at 10:01?
DUDE, i was a avid watcher of your channel about 4-5 years ago; So glad I came across your channel again!
I wish I was a famous enough author that I could see you guess draw from my descriptions cause that would be very interesting
Would love to see him try to draw Erik from “The Phantom of The Opera”!
Oh my god that would be amazing!
I think the only accurate depiction I've seen is the cover by Kamil Vojnar for the 1998 edition by Bantam Doubleday. If he's never read the novel, Erik's description is definitely going to throw him for a loop.
15:43 I thought for sure it was going to be Quasimodo from the Hunchback of Notre Dame
I just found your channel recently and I just want to say thank you for something fun, with all the negativity on the internet this is a breath of fresh air
I needed this today it's super early here in America and I'm awake bc anxiety sucks jazz is the best medicine to try and calm down!!
Edited to say I've read twilight a lot (millennial don't judge) and knew instantly it was Edward and what u drew was what I used to picture in my head until the movies came out ur amazing
I hv anxiety too and I can definitely agree with u.
Same here I feel you man
I'm here in America too! I just got off work, it's crazy to have somebody update while I'm awake (I work overnight)
wait how lol? the blue-green eyes really offset me, he does not have those. genuinely curious because that massively confused me in the video
@@omnimonium it's was the way the hair was described bc it's exactly how they say it in the first book
This is the first time I've watched Jazza in over a year. Me and my (super toxic) ex used to watch Jazza together and I finally was able to come back without feeling triggered. Jazza is just to amazing to forget. I love you, Jazza!! I missed you 💔
for Frankenstein's description I would have thought skinny maybe toned but not bulky like you painted it. it was more like you could see the muscle through the skin rather than muscular and bulky.
The lavendertowne inspired thumbnail really sells it
Sherlock Holmes was definitely sick van dyke! The
description and finished product (looks great and just like him)
I'm proud that I got Sherlock instantly, I knew I'd read that description before. You got the energy for sure!
Ooh, I'd love to see you do some of Jane Austen's characters! I know the descriptions aren't always that detailed, but it'd still be cool. Dickens has some excellent descriptions of characters in his stories.
The first one, I immediately thought it was a Harry Potter character, especially when you said wizard. Second one, I knew right away it was Sherlock Holmes as soon as I saw the description of a tweed suit. Third one, without looking at the comments, I probably would have guessed Edward. I did not figure out the last two. This is my first time watching one of your videos and it was pretty cool. I am amazed by digital artists. It seems too complicated to me. I just like my paper and pencils and the simplicity of it.
I’ve just taken up painting and I’ve always been somewhat artistic. I’ve learned so much from this video! Thank you for this!
Him: Seventeen year old boy
My brain: EDWARD!!!!!!
I thought Gaston... not Frankenstein's Monster, thinking maybe they just cropped his hair in the movie adaptation. But it was interesting to see you basically equate gigantic = massive beer belly 😆
Yeah, I was thinking either very tall and muscled, or tall and built like someone who does a lot of physical labour, you know, very square and stocky without the shortness I guess?
Yeah I was like "where did the potbelly come from????" Lol
I thought it was Hagrid
I was thinking more towards the giants from the BFG
Me too me too. Thought it was gaston.
I loved seeing your interpretation of The Creature from Mary Shelley's _Frankenstein._ I knew who it was from the description straight away (since I'm an English instructor, and I default to _Frankenstein_ when I have to teach how to analyze a literary work), and it was a delight to see how befuddled you were when you put together this smiling strange character. Ahh, he looks like how he could've been had Victor spent one millisecond welcoming The Creature into the world rather than running out of the house to hide in the courtyard until morning... But then we wouldn't get the court case, framing for murder, and the chase through the Arctic, so....sacrifices, sacrifices. Great video!
it's amazing how Mary was only 18 when she wrote that book
the actor of sherlock holmes really fits the description
Love these videos Jazza has such a positive infectious energy
When the phrase 'thin, eager face' immediately triggers a memory of reading those exact words in the book lol. Clearly it made an impact lol
I knew the next to last one. There isn't many other choices. I really enjoy these "Painting characters EXACTLY as described in the book" videos. a lot. They are part drawing and a bit of trivia.
For some reason I thought of Shrek but that makes no sense
@@tiasmith3499 The Frankenstein in the movies didn't exactly match up with the book's description. Shrek is based on a book. A teenage Shrek might fit too. He just went bald and his skin might've darkened as he got older.
I love this! I am so envious of your talent. I could watch you draw all day. I love seeing the art come together! I can’t draw at all, I don’t have any talent.
this is my favorite art video i had so much fun guessing!!
I absolutely loved Frankenstein's creature, mostly because we got to draw him by the book for an English class back in my Sophomore year. As soon as I read his description, I immediately started losing my shit bouncing up and down with joy and excitement to see what Jazza would conjure up.
I was crunched for time when I made mine, so I cut corners by depicting him wearing the cloak he finds, which actually helped me tremendously in getting a haunted look in his eyes by covering half his face with hair from the clock's hood being pulled up.
Man I was so stoked when I read the description for Frankenstein's creature (I will not call him a monster), I've read the book twice so I knew it immediately when seeing the gigantic height and yellow skin, and the Victorian setting just cemented it haha
It had me thinking Phantom of the Opera cuz while he isn’t tall he’s yellow with his nose falling off his face and he needs a full mask not the typical half mask
I thought it was Shrek haha
@@karenalynne The Creature looks more like a goofy troll, rather than the eloquent, articulate person from the book. He would not have had his belly showing either. Also, the 'Victorian setting' is incorrect. Frankenstein was published in 1818, the year before Victoria was born.
You are so talented! Thank you for sharing!
I got obsessed with Frankenstein after I read it in high school, and I got so excited to see how you drew him blindly from the book description ahhhhh
You should do this again with more cartoon/anime character descriptions, I feel like when its actors it's harder to disconnect the book description from how the actor looks, yano?
Still love this idea though!!❤❤
This is so much fun watching we need definitely more!
The first one I’m like umbridge she’s the only character I can think of that wear a pink cardigan
I love this series. When you said toad, black velvet bow and pink cardigan I knew it was umbridge. Also, I thought of Edward Cullen, Percy Jackson or maybe Jason grace for the Edward one, I don’t know why I guess it’s just my own fan girl instincts. You should definitely do some Percy Jackson characters. I mean, the adaptations (movies) were the least accurate you can be, and the show is not focusing on appearance being accurate, whereas the plot and the essence and personality of characters. Even if there’s pretty accurate fan art, it would be really cool to see your way of doing some characters, since some changes are made in fan art. I definitely want to see that
I also thought that it was Jason grace or Luke Castellen but it never said anything about a scar on his eye and with the perfect 17 year old and the blue green eyes fits Percy so I also thought of him as well
I have been really getting into learning digital painting recently so the brush pack has really came at a fantastic time. I just finished my first fully digital painting using it and I'm honestly so blown away by the whole package. Has to be the best investment I've made in a LONG time! So thank you to everyone involved, so much
Danm i love jazza's happines