Suo Motu Case On IHC Judges' Letter: Bench Divided | Campaign Against Justice Babar Sattar

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 кві 2024
  • Welcome to Khabar Say Aagay with Raza Rumi and Nadia Naqi, where we delve into the latest developments from Supreme Court of Pakistan in the Suo Motu Case On IHC Judges' Letter.
    In this episode, we unpack the ramifications of the Suo Motu case initiated based on the IHC judges' letter, revealing a divided bench grappling with critical judicial matters. Join us as we navigate through the complexities surrounding this legal conundrum.
    Additionally, we delve into the unfolding campaign against Justice Babar Sattar, shedding light on the intricacies of this contentious issue. Tune in as we analyze the implications and repercussions of this campaign on Pakistan's judiciary and legal framework.
    Stay informed and ahead of the curve with Khabar Say Aagay, your trusted source for in-depth analysis and insightful commentary on Pakistan's current affairs.
    Don't forget to like, share, and subscribe for more updates!
    #nayadaur #khabarsayaagay #supremecourt #suomoto #isi #atharminallah #qazifaezisa

КОМЕНТАРІ • 59

  • @iffatnayyar3493
    @iffatnayyar3493 20 днів тому +9

    یہئ جج قاضی صاحب کے معاملہ پر عدلیہ کس کے ساتھ کھڑی تھی، وی جج جو آج بڑھ چڑھ کر بات کر رہے ہیں لل تک خاموش رہے ۔

    • @suhailimran5124
      @suhailimran5124 20 днів тому +1

      Anyone with an ounce of integrity can appreciate that some of the judges who are complaining are liable themselves and taking pre emotive actions

    • @razibutt6111
      @razibutt6111 20 днів тому

      Tab ye SAB deep sleep me chale gae Thaa😢

  • @ansardhother1125
    @ansardhother1125 20 днів тому +2

    تنقید کرنا آسان ھے کام کرنا بہت مشکل ھے ملک کسی انتشار کا متحمل نہیں ھو سکتا لیکن طریقے کار بنتا نظر آرھا ھے جو خوش آئندہ ھے

  • @afzalhussain4658
    @afzalhussain4658 20 днів тому +2

    This was very interesting. Raza Saheb after a while was in a different mood and spoke on ground reality.

  • @Bakhtawer786
    @Bakhtawer786 20 днів тому +1

    Raza, very fair comments from you.

  • @solomonlalani
    @solomonlalani 20 днів тому

    Well spoken RR, especially on the accountability of Judiciary itself

  • @khurramayub8512
    @khurramayub8512 20 днів тому +2

    رضا رومی صاحب شوکت صدیقی کا ضمیر جاگا تو پھر ہوا کیا ؟They now feel there is safety in numbers no judge can stand alone.

  • @nasirmir1060
    @nasirmir1060 20 днів тому +6

    J Minhallah who is trying to become a hero remained silent at the time when J Shaukat Siddiqui raised his voice .... because he was going to be a beneficiary.

    • @tariqbutt4453
      @tariqbutt4453 20 днів тому +1

      Your point is 100 percent valid,we are Muslim but munafiq

    • @saeeddeen7304
      @saeeddeen7304 20 днів тому +1

      Very True

  • @nasirmir1060
    @nasirmir1060 20 днів тому

    Good viewpoint of Raza Romi

  • @Bakhtawer786
    @Bakhtawer786 20 днів тому +1

    The pressure on Judiciary, from agencies as well as other judges should stop, no doubt.
    If you ask accountability of the past, then past of the judges will also be judged.
    Judged based on the facts if the judges acted lawfully and did they challenge the interference in the proper forum

  • @talha4743
    @talha4743 20 днів тому

  • @khurramayub8512
    @khurramayub8512 20 днів тому +1

    Politicians are victims not complicit since they are captive themselves.

  • @nasrmobin9530
    @nasrmobin9530 20 днів тому

    W S & great to watch 🎉🎉🎉 factual analysis by Rumi sb ❤👍

  • @user-kp6zn3oq5o
    @user-kp6zn3oq5o 20 днів тому +2

    Mr. Raza Roomi's point of view is the most important to be noted,

    • @parvezali415
      @parvezali415 20 днів тому +2

      IN HOW MANY CASES OF THE COMMON MAN ,THE WRETCHED OF THIS HOLY LAND DOES THE MILITARY ESTABLISHMENT INFLUENCE OR INTERFERE IN THE JUDICIARY?
      FOUR MILLION CASE OF THE COMMON MAN ARE PENDING DECISIONS IN THE COURTS. BUT SELECT POLITICIZED CASES ARE TAKEN UP ON HIGHEST PRIORITY. HOW MUCH TIME IS BEING WASTED ON THESE SPECIAL CASES?

    • @suhailimran5124
      @suhailimran5124 20 днів тому

      Well said
      How many times judges hear cases after hours for common man
      How many prisoners are given the facilities allowed to IK ?

    • @parvezali415
      @parvezali415 20 днів тому

      @@suhailimran5124 IK IS A VVIP PRISONER ENJOYING DELUXE FACILITIES FOR WHOM THE JAIL MANUAL HAS BEEN SUSPENDED BY THE IK FRIENDLY JUDGES.
      DICTIONARY MEANING OF THE WORD PRISON IS : A place where convicted PRISONERS and undertial prisoners are kept in CONFINEMENT AND CAPTIVITY.
      NOT FOR IK WHO IS RUNNING NATIONAL POLITICS FROM HIS DELUXE CELL WHICH IS AN EPICENTER OF POLITICS IN PAKISTAN. HE RUNS A SECRETARIAT FROM WHERE HE CAN WRITE COLUMNS FOR INTERNATIONAL MAGAZINES AND LETTERS TO CJ.HIS PRISON CELL HAS BEEN CONVERTED TO A COURT. HIS WISH IS HIS COMMAND. AS FOR BUSHRA , THE PIOUS LADY HAS BEEN ALLOWED TO LIVE IN HER PALACE AT BANI GALA BUILT ON ILLEGAL LAND REGULARIZED BY BABA REHMATEY.
      AS FOR THE COMMON MAN, A CASE OF AN MNA FROM DG KHAN WAS DECIDED IN THE DAYS OF BABA REHMATEY AFTER FULL 100 YEARS. A LAND DISPUTE WHICH STARTED IN 1918 WAS FINALLY DECIDED IN 2018. There are many such cases.

  • @collinkamran3854
    @collinkamran3854 20 днів тому

    Anchor has cosmetically prepared beautifully specially the Eye Lashes🎉

  • @mobeenmalik6835
    @mobeenmalik6835 20 днів тому

    Raza sahab they did not even mention who interfered and what they really wanted. Did they oblige?

  • @naziralam658
    @naziralam658 20 днів тому

    How can a compromised judge avoid such influence

  • @abuanas1416
    @abuanas1416 20 днів тому +2

    ‏آج نوازشریف کے موقف کی بھی جیت ہوئی۔۔۔۔ آج فائز عیسیٰ کے ریمارکس نے دل کو ٹھنڈک پہنچائی ہے۔۔
    میں کئی بار لکھ چکا ہوں 6 ججز کے خط کے پیچھے جو ماسٹر مائنڈ ہیں ان میں جسٹس اطہر من اللہ بھی شامل ہیں اور آج سماعت کے شروع میں ہی اطہر من اللہ نے اس بات کو سچ بھی ثابت کیا، چیف جسٹس عیسیٰ کے ہر ریمارکس کو جسٹس اطہر من کاونٹر کرنے کی کوشش کر رہے تھے اور انکے ساتھ سینگ پھنسا رکھے تھے، جسٹس بابر ستار کی بلاوجہ تعریفیں کئے جا رہے تھے اور کوشش کر رہے تھے کہ انہیں سپریم کورٹ سے کلین چٹ دی جائے جس پر چیف جسٹس نے بیرونی مداخلت کیساتھ اندرونی مداخلت اور ساتھ جسٹس شوکت صدیقی کا زکر چھیڑ کر جسٹس اطہر من اللہ کی بولتی بند کردی کیونکہ سب جانتے ہیں اطہر من اللہ خود چیف جسٹس اسلام آباد ہائیکورٹ بننے کے چکر میں جسٹس شوکت صدیقی کیساتھ کیا کر چکے ہیں۔ چیف جسٹس نے سماعت کے شروع میں کہا میں چاہتا تھا فل کورٹ سماعت ہو لیکن ایک جج ویسے معذرت کر چکا ہے اور اسلام آباد میں جو ججز موجود تھے ان سبکو بنچ میں شامل کیا گیا ہے میں نے انتظار اس لئے نہیں کیا کیونکہ پھر قیاس آرائیاں نہ شروع ہو جائیں اس پر اطہر من اللہ نے مداخلت کرتے ہوئے کہا کہ عدلیہ میں مداخلت کی جا رہی ہے، جس پر فائز عیسیٰ نے اطہر من اللہ کی طرف دیکھتے ہوئے کہا تو کیا ہائیکورٹ ججز کے پاس یہ اختیار نہیں ہیں کہ مداخلت کرنے والو کو عدالت طلب کر کے اسکے خلاف کاروائی شروع کر سکے اور اگر مداخلت کی بات کرنی ہے تو کیا ادارے کے اندر سے مداخلت نہیں ہوتی رہی؟ کیا سابقہ چیف جسٹس فون کال کے زریعے فیصلے نہیں کرواتے تھے، کیا سپریم کورٹ کی جانب سے کسی خاص مقدمے میں مانیٹرنگ جج نہیں لگایا گیا؟ کیا پاکستانی عدلیہ کی تاریخ میں پہلے کبھی ایسا ہوا ہے کہ کسی خاص شخص کو پھمسانے کے لئے مانیٹرنگ جج لگایا جائے؟ کیا ہم نے ایجنسیوں پر مشتمل جے آئی ٹی نہیں بنوائی؟ اور وفاقی اداروں کو حکم نہیں دیا کہ آپ نے ان ایجنسیوں کی معاونت کرنی ہے تا کہ من مرضی کی رپورٹ بن سکے؟ اور پھر ایم آئی اور آئی ایس آئی کی تیار کر دا رپورٹ پر عدالت نے آنکھیں بند کر کے یقین نہیں کیا تھا ؟ ہم پہلے خود مداخلت کے دروازے کھولتے ہیں انکو بلاتے ہیں ان سے مرضی کے کام لیتے ہیں اور جب کوئی خلاف مرضی کام ہو تو ہم کہتے ہیں کہ مداخلت ہو رہی ہے؟ میں نے اس کرسی پر بیٹھتے ہی پہلے دن کہا تھا کوئی مداخلت نہیں ہو گی اور پھر کوئی مداخلت نہیں ہوئی، ان 6 ججز نے جو خط لکھا ہے وہ سابقہ چیف جسٹس بندیال کے دور کی مداخلت کا زکر کر رہے ہیں، ان ججز نے یہ چط لکھ کر اس پنڈورا باکس کو کھولا ہے جو ہم خیال ججز کے دور میں ہوتا رہا ہے، قاضی فائز نے یہ سارے ریمارکس ایک سانس میں دیے اور تب جسٹس اطہر من اللہ کے پسینے چھوٹ گے اور وہ سائیڈ پر پڑا گلاس اٹھا پانی پینے لگ پڑے اور پھر جسٹس اطہر من اللہ نے قاضی فائز عیسیٰ کو انٹرپٹ کرنے کی غلطی نہیں کی، کیونکہ وہ سمجھ چکے تھے چیف جسٹس فائز عیسیٰ سب کی دھوتیاں اتارنے کی طرف چل نکلے ہیں.....!!!

    • @parvezali415
      @parvezali415 20 днів тому

      ATHER MINALLAH ' s uncalled for intervention in support of Babar Sattar which was not the topic under discussion worked. Overwhelmed the Attorney general wiped his slate clean and rescued Babar Sattar NOT knowing that a US GREEN HOLDER IS BARRED FROM SEEKING EMPLOYMENT OUTSIDE THE US. AND ALSO BARRED FROM LIVING OUTSIDE THE US EXCEPT FOR VERY BRIEF INTERLUDE UNTIL HIS GREEN CARD GETS CONVERTED TO US CITIZENSHIP. ONE WONDERS WHAT GIMMICK BABAR SATTAR IS DOING ON HIS TAX RETURNS IN US WHILE WORKING FOR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN PAKISTAN.

  • @bbhusari
    @bbhusari 20 днів тому

    Charge sheet of HC, CJP vs Athur Minhalla, not limited to 6 judges but all HCs Rose against intelligence agencies. Babar Sattar, CJP remain muted.

  • @zahidahmedali7083
    @zahidahmedali7083 20 днів тому

    Who will protect judge from his/her own bias and his/her mother-in-law'a pressures?

  • @khurshidabbasi173
    @khurshidabbasi173 20 днів тому +1

    Some Bad'niyyet characters on
    Niya daur urdu trying to kill
    2 birds with one stone.
    Chief justice and Army.

  • @suhailimran5124
    @suhailimran5124 20 днів тому

    It is surprising that even experienced journalists/ analysts can’t understand the bigger picture as far as interference in judicial process is concerned
    Obviously no one can and would say it is okay for agencies to interfere but how were judges selected in the first place and what if judges themselves are corrupted and politicised , very convenient to externalise blame and responsibility and portray judiciary as innocent
    The reality is that at least since ex CJP Iftihar a take over , Judiciary is interfering in everything and wants to take over what was army s area of influence
    Any neutral person can look at the political cases outcome since 2013 and it is evident judiciary was corrupt and politicised
    Is it for judges to behave like mafia but object to others interference
    No accountability for judges 😢

  • @nasirmir1060
    @nasirmir1060 20 днів тому

    What about the pressure of Sasu maa type characters ?

  • @abdulmateenshahid627
    @abdulmateenshahid627 20 днів тому

    Raza 😂is right 👍 good

  • @nasirmir1060
    @nasirmir1060 20 днів тому

    Suggest you to continue this debate and invite Muzammil Suharwardi + Saeed Chaudhry also.

  • @mulluv2009
    @mulluv2009 20 днів тому +1

    لگتا ہے آج مہمان زیادہ بلا لیے اور کسی کو بھی اپنی پوری بات کرنے کا موقع نہیں دیا - نادیہ آپ کے کیرئیر کا سفر ابھی دور ہے

  • @shahabmaqsood7834
    @shahabmaqsood7834 20 днів тому +1

    don't understand
    why an elected prime minister was sent home on AQAMA and the high court holding green card of America and enjoying as hight court judge?

    • @parvezali415
      @parvezali415 20 днів тому +1

      Green card holder is a PERMANENT RESIDENT OF US and as such he cannot seek employment outside the US, nor can he stay outside the US except for brief interlude. He is therefore involved in illegal activity in the eyes of US IMMIGRATION. He must also be dodging info in his Tax returns which he has to submit in US every year. This is where his hands are soiled.

    • @parvezali415
      @parvezali415 20 днів тому +1

      Justice ATHER MINALLAH bringing up the cause of BABAR SATTAR was totally uncalled for in the case of the letter of six . From where did this subject of Babar Sattar pop out unnecessarily.
      ATHER MINALLAH is just trying to be the devil's advocate as a known activist . Babar Sattar is his friend and it was ATHER MINALLAH who as CJ IHC insisted on his appointment as a judge despite dissent from various members of the committee.

  • @investormamu3087
    @investormamu3087 20 днів тому

    Shah sahab is the best lawyer, if you have money laundered, or want to evade tax, he will help you, though he is very expensive! Most of the criminal has sought Shah sahab counsel and have gotten away with heinous crime!

  • @waqarhasan8922
    @waqarhasan8922 20 днів тому +2

    Main problem is not addressed by anyone of you. Main issue is very simple as most of High Court and supreme court judges were appointed by ISI and these six judges of Islamabad high Court, Lahore high Court and Peshawar high Court judges were appointed by ISI on the request of PTI leaders to crush other political parties. As PTI earned billions by appointing such political corrupt judges without looking on any merit. Later on these judges earned billions by supporting and rewriting constitution in Punjab Assembly cases and by supporting PTI criminals. As the policies of ISI changed and they want decisions against PTI but these judges find it difficult to say no to PTI criminals who are their partners with their illegal parents Military establishment. These judges are being blackmailed by both PTI and ISI who were their partners in crime.

  • @Tufail-ch8bq
    @Tufail-ch8bq 20 днів тому +1

    ثاقب۔نثار۔کے۔کارنامے۔اعجازالحسن۔جنہوں۔۔نے۔نگران۔جج۔کا۔کردار۔کس۔قانون۔کے۔تحت۔کیا۔حکومت۔نے۔اٹے۔کیساتھ۔روٹی۔سستی۔جہانگیری۔کو۔کیوں۔تکلیف۔ہوئ۔اقامے۔کاتعلق۔سزا

  • @sarahzsiddiqi3328
    @sarahzsiddiqi3328 20 днів тому

    Issue of timing is also raised when sexual harassment victims speak up after the event "me too". Delay should be placed in the social/political context at the time.

    • @sarahzsiddiqi3328
      @sarahzsiddiqi3328 20 днів тому

      RR's reference to kidnapping of a judge's son should be a point of reflection for why the 6 IHC judges did not speak up sooner.

  • @MKhan-hb8jk
    @MKhan-hb8jk 20 днів тому

    Who is going to bell the cat ?

  • @bbhusari
    @bbhusari 20 днів тому

    Nadia will take some time to become a matured anchor, she comes to inferences so early and readily. She has a long way to go in Media, hope she learns quickly as she often is part of very distinguished panelist and reporters.

  • @gulzargulzarcheema5668
    @gulzargulzarcheema5668 20 днів тому

    This chuwal Ahmed Hassan should be informed that social and internal sifarish is common everywhere but in non country Army or it’s other forces blackmail judges for getting favourable decisions

  • @amaanullahkhan
    @amaanullahkhan 20 днів тому +1

    Since Nadia Naqi always represents PTI so her role as anchore losing the interest of unbiased viewers, plz try to not her involved in our only favorite program or we will quit this also.

    • @ntufpak
      @ntufpak 20 днів тому

      It's your misunderstanding, it's not true

  • @khurshidabbasi173
    @khurshidabbasi173 20 днів тому

    Anti Army Roomi and Transvestites lol

  • @gulzargulzarcheema5668
    @gulzargulzarcheema5668 20 днів тому

    This forum is no doubt N league forum and so called biased and dishonest intellectuals

  • @gulzargulzarcheema5668
    @gulzargulzarcheema5668 20 днів тому

    Why don’t you guys join PML N
    Always there is interference in judiciary, I have seen you guys while QAzi Faiz ESA in hot waters, you all were crying like your father is going to died
    But now you are creating a lot of ifs and buts

  • @GoldmanSachs7
    @GoldmanSachs7 20 днів тому

    I am in a state of shock and awe as to what happened to Raza today…hitting the nail smack on its head and not meandering off to create some kind of cover for the six musketeers including their Agent Provocateur Athar Minallah sitting in the SC. Mr Minallahah is believed to be the author of this letter those six musketeers wrote and in todays proceedings who kept differing with CJP and the Senior Puisne judge on hilarious matters, like for instance he wanted this letter that he purportedly wrote should conclusively be declared as a charge sheet and just that letter, he didn’t want the bench discussing all forms of internal interferences and meddling by the judges of the past particularly the previous CJ’s by appointing certain types of judges, constituting a certain kind of benches to obtain certain kind of judgements, appointing supervisory judges et al. The best part though was that none of those six musketeers could cite specific incidents where they were interfered with, going by Mr Afridi’s assessment why couldn’t these johnnies exercise their power of contempt?? But suddenly they all held each others hands and started singing kumbaya… in a nut shell, they were trying to create a smoke screen of pressure to wily nily give relief to the cricketer and his wife. Period !! And I am glad this proceeding will now skirt the entire gamut of the issue and lay down checks and balances. Finally, this panelist called Sabih, what was he droning on about? He even went to the extent of accusing the CJP of some package etc, these are grounds for contempt for creating and spreading wilful bunkum, please never invite this moron again…Nadia as usual superb and on the ball

  • @tariqbutt4453
    @tariqbutt4453 20 днів тому

    Where is Mr.Solangi sahib,? please bring him in this show,he is asset of this show.

  • @abdulqayyumjanjua5178
    @abdulqayyumjanjua5178 20 днів тому

    QAZI SAHIB >>> AAP KI ADLIA MEIN >>> CORRUPTED, RISHWATKHORE AUR MAFIAS DONS GROUPS KE AGENTS JUDGES SE INSAF KI UMMEED KI JA SAKTI HAI ????? ABTAK INKA KIRDAR >>> INSAF KE QATILON JAISA RAHA HAI ????? ..... ???