I definitely feel like the scraptrap design was probably a prototype that wasn’t implemented with the audio lure technology while the springtrap design was used for both Fredbear’s and Freddy’s. After the fnaf 3 fire, william went somewhere (maybe Freddy’s or Fredbear’s) to find and wear the scraptrap suit for both stability, and to get rid of the audio lure feature from the previous suit. And after the fnaf 6 fire and when vanny was probably rebuilding afton using his corpse, glamrock Endo parts (or the mimic), and the springtrap suit from the story “Pressure”.
There is also a theory that William used parts of golden Freddy to fix his suit. This would line up with the fact that his upper jaw looks a lot like the one that golden Freddy has. Also this could have been the part where cassidy attached herself to Williams soul and when he was weak enough after the fire she put him in to the UCN coma.
The use of Golden Freddy also helps to explain how Cassidy moved on and became the Princess. So that's understandable. Small clue though; Scraptrap has large rabbit teeth, the FNAF 3 Bonnie costume doesn't, neither does Golden Freddy. While William was falling apart he finds and installs some rabbit teeth? If its William's costume then they come with it.
I also believe there is two fredbears one that looks like fredbear in fnaf 4 and one that looks like withered golden Freddy (one is lost and one got changed to the fnaf 1 version like the other animatronics)
This is the "Is the book canon?" discussion from Scott in 2015. I disagree with the communities explanation, instead read it as referring to story and character arcs. The post was written in response to the books not solving FNAF 4. Each game Scott releases hasn't solved the previous games; and the novel was no exception.
this might be a stretch, but if there ARE two spring bonnie suits, it's possible that it could've been the suit Michael wore in Night 4 of Sister Location
It would be a good story narratively, sins of the father coming back for the son. Although the springlock Bonnie and Freddy heads don't have a separation line down the middle. It's more likely something intended for the Circus Baby restaurant.
@@DoesEvilAWSHUKThingsGuyCIR-m8d With metal rods dug into his flesh with wires replacing his veins and having circuitry and a battery pack where his organs should be? Cuz id rather be crucified than dealing with that.
Again the theory that scraptrap is not william i think he just change suit Mostly are like 5 or 6 suits that are springtrap suit,scraptrap suit,into the pit and the fnaf 4 suit that apears with william is the same,novels suit, and fnaf 4 parts&service room that i think thats the suit of shadow bonnie
Are you comparing 1980's Bonnie to FNAF 3 Springtrap? Different hues in games change the colour of characters. FNAF 3 dark green, Pizzeria Simulator amber, Security Breach red.
I've thought that once Fredbear got possessed in 1985 then we called it Golden Freddy. Although in FNAF 4 seeing a bear on stage and Henry(?) in the Fredbear costume would suggest two. I was thinking about it while writing this video. I'll think about it some more and do something in the future.
What if after fazbear frights was burned in fnaf3 Williams corpses went to fredbears and possessed the scraptrap suit.after all in fnaf4 we see a spring Bonnie that seems to resemble scraptrap mor than spring trap
I'm all for book evidence but you talk about games and Silver Eyes a few times as if they're the same continuity here, unless I've misunderstood the wording.
You understand me right. My separation doesn't come from books and games differing but which games/books go together. I'm working on a script now that covers FNAF 1-3 is the original, then up-to UCN is second, then the HW2 is third. The continuity comes from release dates of source material; not the medium they are made.
@@FazbearsMenagerieOfMadness Okay, that works for the games and Frights/Tales, Scott leaves it up to us. But, it doesn't work for the Silver Eyes trilogy, which are canon to the franchise but explicitly not the same continuity. Sure ideas and themes are either the same or parallel eachother but, for example, there's no Charlie Puppet which must mean you can't place them on the same timeline. Do you get what I mean? You can't have Charlie-Bot and Charlie-Puppet in the same sequence of events to stick with that example. It works with the rest of the books, just not that trilogy.
My video "Charlie & Charlotte are different characters" covers this. You can't have Charlie-bot without Charlotte processing Puppet. The Ella doll inside of Charlie is connected with Charlotte. The doll connects the spirit of the dead with the living (animatronic). This I think is nedium-ship which I spoke about in "Fredbear plush is important". A better example of different characters would have been Henry. A fake Henry dying in Silver Eyes would need to be convincingly dead, and able to bleed. Just like the animatronic Henry made in Charlie. If Henry made one more, and wanted to spare Charlie his ongoing remorse; an animatronic of him would need to be stabbed and leave the blood at the base of the stairs. As long as the Sheriff doesn't investigate too much. Henry leaves the animatronic to the grave and moves on leaving Charlie to his sister Jen.
I was referring to the The Silver Eyes graphic novel. The illustrated adaptation published in December 2019. Today it costs about the same as a Tales from the Pizzaplex book.
So let's get the source material involved. If the reddit post "Is the book canon?" is what we are talking about then it was written because "reviews on Amazon chastise the book [Silver Eyes] for not matching the games". FNAF 1-3 was considered the "original story" in Dawko and Scott's interview. FNAF 4 and the novels differ from early games because "sometimes the lore of something can become so crowded that you can't tell an original story anymore". The books aren't "intended to fit together like two puzzle pieces", although "the book is canon, just as the games are". "The book is a re-imagining of the FNAF story..." [FNAF 1-3]. As I'm using the novels and Scraptrap then I'm clearly using the revised continuity. Something I'm looking into now is what the first three games lore was compared to the games and stories that followed. I don't have a quote from the Fazbear Frights range so if you know of one then please direct me to it.
I mean this is agreable as it highly likely for there to be more then 1 suit as springlock failures could damage them
I definitely feel like the scraptrap design was probably a prototype that wasn’t implemented with the audio lure technology while the springtrap design was used for both Fredbear’s and Freddy’s. After the fnaf 3 fire, william went somewhere (maybe Freddy’s or Fredbear’s) to find and wear the scraptrap suit for both stability, and to get rid of the audio lure feature from the previous suit. And after the fnaf 6 fire and when vanny was probably rebuilding afton using his corpse, glamrock Endo parts (or the mimic), and the springtrap suit from the story “Pressure”.
There is also a theory that William used parts of golden Freddy to fix his suit. This would line up with the fact that his upper jaw looks a lot like the one that golden Freddy has. Also this could have been the part where cassidy attached herself to Williams soul and when he was weak enough after the fire she put him in to the UCN coma.
The use of Golden Freddy also helps to explain how Cassidy moved on and became the Princess. So that's understandable. Small clue though; Scraptrap has large rabbit teeth, the FNAF 3 Bonnie costume doesn't, neither does Golden Freddy. While William was falling apart he finds and installs some rabbit teeth? If its William's costume then they come with it.
I also believe there is two fredbears one that looks like fredbear in fnaf 4 and one that looks like withered golden Freddy (one is lost and one got changed to the fnaf 1 version like the other animatronics)
I thought everyone knew this already, the Scraptrap suit is the that one Springbonnie suit in one the fnaf 4 cutscenes
Point is, there are MANY Springbonnie suits, every version of Springtrap we've seen so far are all different Springbonnie suits, there are tons more.
@@aminethbt885 Every copy of Springbonnie is personalized
UA-cam randomly suggested this to me in my notifications. Never played the games but your video is still pretty interesting 10/10
I'm more of a book reader than a player. It's good to know YT is suggesting my videos.
The only thing is though is that you are fusing two different cannons as the books and the movie are confirmed to be cannons
This is the "Is the book canon?" discussion from Scott in 2015. I disagree with the communities explanation, instead read it as referring to story and character arcs. The post was written in response to the books not solving FNAF 4. Each game Scott releases hasn't solved the previous games; and the novel was no exception.
@@FazbearsMenagerieOfMadness well if u disagree with a fact then, hate to tell u ur wrong
Scott has explained that the Movie's lore is different from the other canons.
I always believed there more than 2. Especially the ones in the storage room of fredbear.
this might be a stretch, but if there ARE two spring bonnie suits, it's possible that it could've been the suit Michael wore in Night 4 of Sister Location
It would be a good story narratively, sins of the father coming back for the son. Although the springlock Bonnie and Freddy heads don't have a separation line down the middle. It's more likely something intended for the Circus Baby restaurant.
My main issue with Scraptrap being a new suit instead of an altered one is that if Afton could just leave the suit, why didn't he?
I guess William liked being a animatronic.
@@DoesEvilAWSHUKThingsGuyCIR-m8d With metal rods dug into his flesh with wires replacing his veins and having circuitry and a battery pack where his organs should be? Cuz id rather be crucified than dealing with that.
Again the theory that scraptrap is not william i think he just change suit
Mostly are like 5 or 6 suits that are springtrap suit,scraptrap suit,into the pit and the fnaf 4 suit that apears with william is the same,novels suit, and fnaf 4 parts&service room that i think thats the suit of shadow bonnie
But what about spring Traps calfs and thighs being darker than the base suit
Are you comparing 1980's Bonnie to FNAF 3 Springtrap? Different hues in games change the colour of characters. FNAF 3 dark green, Pizzeria Simulator amber, Security Breach red.
Now that you’ve done spring Bonny, can you try to find if fredbear and golden Freddy are the same or diffrent?
I've thought that once Fredbear got possessed in 1985 then we called it Golden Freddy.
Although in FNAF 4 seeing a bear on stage and Henry(?) in the Fredbear costume would suggest two.
I was thinking about it while writing this video. I'll think about it some more and do something in the future.
@@FazbearsMenagerieOfMadness thanks
What if after fazbear frights was burned in fnaf3 Williams corpses went to fredbears and possessed the scraptrap suit.after all in fnaf4 we see a spring Bonnie that seems to resemble scraptrap mor than spring trap
I'm all for book evidence but you talk about games and Silver Eyes a few times as if they're the same continuity here, unless I've misunderstood the wording.
You understand me right. My separation doesn't come from books and games differing but which games/books go together. I'm working on a script now that covers FNAF 1-3 is the original, then up-to UCN is second, then the HW2 is third. The continuity comes from release dates of source material; not the medium they are made.
@@FazbearsMenagerieOfMadness Okay, that works for the games and Frights/Tales, Scott leaves it up to us.
But, it doesn't work for the Silver Eyes trilogy, which are canon to the franchise but explicitly not the same continuity.
Sure ideas and themes are either the same or parallel eachother but, for example, there's no Charlie Puppet which must mean you can't place them on the same timeline.
Do you get what I mean? You can't have Charlie-Bot and Charlie-Puppet in the same sequence of events to stick with that example. It works with the rest of the books, just not that trilogy.
My video "Charlie & Charlotte are different characters" covers this. You can't have Charlie-bot without Charlotte processing Puppet. The Ella doll inside of Charlie is connected with Charlotte. The doll connects the spirit of the dead with the living (animatronic). This I think is nedium-ship which I spoke about in "Fredbear plush is important".
A better example of different characters would have been Henry. A fake Henry dying in Silver Eyes would need to be convincingly dead, and able to bleed. Just like the animatronic Henry made in Charlie. If Henry made one more, and wanted to spare Charlie his ongoing remorse; an animatronic of him would need to be stabbed and leave the blood at the base of the stairs. As long as the Sheriff doesn't investigate too much. Henry leaves the animatronic to the grave and moves on leaving Charlie to his sister Jen.
Where can I find this book? 3:02
I was referring to the The Silver Eyes graphic novel. The illustrated adaptation published in December 2019. Today it costs about the same as a Tales from the Pizzaplex book.
@@FazbearsMenagerieOfMadness Thank you!
Yeah but the books are non canon
This is partially correct
While the books are non canon, you can take elements and slot them into the canon, which is exactly what Scott has said
@@novawolf_gaming even if that was true it still states springtrap just got *Some* Parts then turned into scrap trap
@Levisworld9 Oh yeah, I don't agree with this guy at all 😂😂
It was stated that William rebuilt his suit from spare parts, thus creating Scraptrap
So let's get the source material involved. If the reddit post "Is the book canon?" is what we are talking about then it was written because "reviews on Amazon chastise the book [Silver Eyes] for not matching the games". FNAF 1-3 was considered the "original story" in Dawko and Scott's interview.
FNAF 4 and the novels differ from early games because "sometimes the lore of something can become so crowded that you can't tell an original story anymore". The books aren't "intended to fit together like two puzzle pieces", although "the book is canon, just as the games are". "The book is a re-imagining of the FNAF story..." [FNAF 1-3].
As I'm using the novels and Scraptrap then I'm clearly using the revised continuity. Something I'm looking into now is what the first three games lore was compared to the games and stories that followed.
I don't have a quote from the Fazbear Frights range so if you know of one then please direct me to it.