How Maersk Is Navigating The Volatile Shipping Industry

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 тра 2024
  • Each year, about 90% of world trade is transported by ship. While commodities like oil and grain make up 40% of that cargo, large steel containers, filled with appliances, smartphones, and couches, make up the remainder. Maersk, the world's second largest container shipping company, transports about one in five of those containers.
    In addition to its fleet of over 670 vessels, the Danish-based carrier also runs one of the globe's largest port terminal businesses, with 64 terminals. Maersk logged record profits of $29.3 billion in 2022 due in part to pandemic-induced buying and higher freight rates.
    But the company is flagging "high uncertainty" for the year ahead as a shift in consumer spending habits has brought revenue in line with pre-pandemic levels. Today, like its rivals, Maersk faces a range of challenges including attacks on vessels in the Red Sea, a drought at the Panama Canal, and the threat of higher tariffs related to a potential Trump presidency.
    The company also chartered the vessel that crashed into the Francis Scott Key Bridge causing the structure to collapse and the Port of Baltimore to close.
    CNBC explores how Maersk’s business has evolved and how it is navigating the many challenges the shipping industry faces today.
    Chapters:
    0:00 Introduction
    2:44 Chapter 1: Global challenges
    5:38 Chapter 2: The early days
    8:43 Chapter 3: Pivoting to land
    Produced by: Shawn Baldwin
    Edited by: Nic Golden Henry
    Supervising Producer: Jeniece Pettitt
    Additional Reporting: Lori Ann LaRocco
    Animation: Christina Locopo
    Additional Footage: Getty Images, Maersk
    » Subscribe to CNBC: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBC
    » Subscribe to CNBC TV: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBCtelevision
    About CNBC: From 'Wall Street' to 'Main Street' to award winning original documentaries and Reality TV series, CNBC has you covered. Experience special sneak peeks of your favorite shows, exclusive video and more.
    Want to make extra money outside of your day job? Take CNBC’s new online course How to Earn Passive Income Online to learn about common passive income streams. Register today and save 50% with discount code EARLYBIRD: cnb.cx/3Iwblnk
    Connect with CNBC News Online
    Get the latest news: www.cnbc.com/
    Follow CNBC on LinkedIn: cnb.cx/LinkedInCNBC
    Follow CNBC News on Instagram: cnb.cx/InstagramCNBC
    Follow CNBC News on Facebook: cnb.cx/LikeCNBC
    Follow CNBC on Threads: cnb.cx/threads
    Follow CNBC News on X: cnb.cx/FollowCNBC
    #CNBC
    How Maersk Is Navigating The Volatile Shipping Industry

КОМЕНТАРІ • 174

  • @youtubetim3577
    @youtubetim3577 Місяць тому +100

    These comments annoy me so bad, do people even listen or try to understand before commenting. Maersk chartered the ship meaning the other company owns ship, has crew on ship and hauling maersk cargo. In a trucking accident do you blame driver and trucking company or the people that own the boxes on the truck... my gosh, and the people saying ripping people off the shipping rates been so bad barely any profits last number of quarters, love how people expect every company to be a charity case except tech but perfectly fine having apple rip you off charging 1400 dollars for a phone that costs them 10 bucks.

    • @brodriguez11000
      @brodriguez11000 Місяць тому +3

      I own an Android. ;-)

    • @nothisispatrick8001
      @nothisispatrick8001 Місяць тому

      I guess most people don't care, people died in an accident and they want someone to blame and a "greedy" global company is perfect...

    • @laviefu0630
      @laviefu0630 Місяць тому +1

      Thank you for your righteous insight, couldn't agree more.

    • @dimosfakiris8914
      @dimosfakiris8914 24 дні тому

      Completely agree with you on that. It's also mind blowing to me that when they have some surplus ships, they immediately call it a huge problem. But then when there's a need to scale up operations quickly (such as going around Africa) they say that's what helps them keep operating. Sounds like we're trying to run out of fuel as soon as the plane lands with the planning of these people. Surely a surplus of capacity should be preferred for that exact reason (something happens and there's an immediate need for ships). It's the exact same problem in the airline industry at the moment and it's absolutely mind blowing to me that all these years, no one thinks of any amount of redundancy/spike in demand/other issue and plans for it.

    • @xienjougao3131
      @xienjougao3131 21 день тому +1

      agree! expensive price for that carrier with hidden charges and will go to just advertisement which all carriers do but they spend more.

  • @catwbongos1416
    @catwbongos1416 Місяць тому +165

    You guys have to be trolling right now by also releasing this video

    • @SuperPerfectMan
      @SuperPerfectMan Місяць тому +7

      Why ?

    • @SlightlyOddFilms
      @SlightlyOddFilms Місяць тому +5

      @@SuperPerfectManbruh, seriously?

    • @achalvyas90
      @achalvyas90 Місяць тому +9

      Sounds like a sponsored gig, right??

    • @dirtymike3329
      @dirtymike3329 Місяць тому +23

      @@SuperPerfectMan A Maersk ship destroyed a major bridge in Baltimore recently

    • @beaniemac
      @beaniemac Місяць тому +9

      I was thinking the same thing. That key bridge accident is going to cost them billions

  • @EcomCarl
    @EcomCarl 9 днів тому +1

    Maersk's strategic diversification into air freight and last-mile delivery is a smart move in navigating the unpredictable waters of global trade. This holistic approach not only mitigates risks but also enhances their ability to adapt to rapidly changing market dynamics. 🚢

  • @user-cv4od1qd4x
    @user-cv4od1qd4x 3 хвилини тому

    Thank you very much for such a detailed review, now I know exactly what I need.

  • @mattygaga2013
    @mattygaga2013 23 дні тому +3

    9:22 the ship that is blurred out is NYK LINE and is the NYK LYRA. Not sure why CNBC blurred it out.

  • @craumm
    @craumm Місяць тому +7

    "1.5 tonnes of goods are shipped by ship per person each year" WOW! I never ordered so much stuff from Amazon!

    • @ricke3939
      @ricke3939 23 дні тому

      This figure also includes (in fact the majority is) commodities such as oil, fuels, ores, gas, and grain as well as cars, trucks, and other vehicles. Finished goods (which is what is mainly transported in containers) only make up about 20% of all shipping.

  • @SlightlyOddFilms
    @SlightlyOddFilms Місяць тому +35

    They are navigating through key supports to avoid collapse

    • @MR-04
      @MR-04 Місяць тому +7

      Just because you don't like the company for no apparent reason doesn't mean a ship they chartered (Borrowed/Lent) to another company is their responsibility. Like when you rent a car then that vehicle is YOUR responsibility and NOT theirs!

    • @SlightlyOddFilms
      @SlightlyOddFilms Місяць тому

      @@MR-04 it was a joke

  • @OwenAlekos-mh7yw
    @OwenAlekos-mh7yw Місяць тому +1

    Is Maersk actually Samsung?
    Dpworld stands for danish port world?

  • @doodskie999
    @doodskie999 Місяць тому +6

    Ah Maersk, making a bridge from ocean to ocean
    Well sometimes destroying it 😂

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 24 дні тому +1

      It was not their ship. It was chartered. Knowledge is power my friend. Sometimes it pays to be better informed.

  • @_Vancelvany_
    @_Vancelvany_ Місяць тому +8

    This freight ship lines are a huge factor on why our consumer goods are going up.
    Maersk & others have increased the freight prices which is then passed on to us to maintain their OR...
    What we're about to see is a shift in logistics, especially in NA, with the likes of Maersk doing M&A's and then investments in Mexico that is becoming the battleground for end-to-end logistics.
    Honestly, the only takeaway here is until North American logistics stabilizes post-shift away from China and leverages fully the USMCA in trade, Maersk & the likes will continue to make bank & eat up all the smaller companies in every facet of the supply chain LOL

    • @youtubetim3577
      @youtubetim3577 Місяць тому

      Are you dumb? Go look at shipping profits in 2023 and this year so far its been barely profitable, most aren't even paying out dividends of any sort atm cause so bad, last year I made almost 15,000 dollars in dividends and this year will not even be 1,000. Try looking at a balance sheet of profits before you talk trash

    • @pjacobsen1000
      @pjacobsen1000 Місяць тому +3

      "This freight ship lines are a huge factor on why our consumer goods are going up."
      A 40' container can hold 10,000 laptops. It costs US$ 3,000 to ship from China to US west coast. That equates to 30 cents per laptop. It used to cost only 10 cents per laptop computer, so yes, the price of your MacBook has gone up 20 cents due to these evil, greedy container shipping companies. Your claim that shipping is a 'huge factor' is simply false. The reality is that a very large part of the price of many goods is due to advertising and marketing. A huge proportion. For known brands, it's probably over 30% of the price you pay that goes to advertisers. But without advertising and marketing, you probably wouldn't buy the product in the first place.

    • @youtubetim3577
      @youtubetim3577 Місяць тому

      @pjacobsen1000 yep rates haven't went up sense the 90s basically, yet people crying a river. Reminds me of gas people crying a river when up 10 cents a gallon in 10 years and same time pay 10 bucks a day for Starbucks coffee, hilarious how things needed to survive go up price people freak out while same time let apple charge them 1400 for a new phone that costs them 50 bucks to make and need a upgrade every year... fact is they think companies for living essentials should be a charity case to them and not profitable while same time fine that apple and these other places rip them off.. people screwed up

  • @tubby_1278
    @tubby_1278 Місяць тому +4

    Those ships are like cities and imagine working on em.

    • @catatonicbug7522
      @catatonicbug7522 Місяць тому

      They are surprisingly simple. Only a handful of people onboard each one.

  • @user-xh8wi3ce1i
    @user-xh8wi3ce1i 25 днів тому

    Very informative thanks

  • @CaptRR
    @CaptRR Місяць тому +4

    They could start by not navigating into bridges.

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 24 дні тому +1

      It was not their ship. It was chartered. Knowledge is power my friend. Sometimes it pays to be better informed.

  • @go-ek7sg
    @go-ek7sg Місяць тому +3

    9:22 Why is the company name on the ship blurred out?

    • @rinoohhighskilled7236
      @rinoohhighskilled7236 24 дні тому

      its their competitor Evergreen ;)

    • @mattygaga2013
      @mattygaga2013 23 дні тому +1

      It's the NYK LINE and the ship I believe is the NYK LYRA. A Japanese based shipping company.

    • @mattygaga2013
      @mattygaga2013 23 дні тому

      ​@@rinoohhighskilled7236nope, it's NYK LINE and the ship is the NYK LYRA I believe.

  • @JohnDoe19754
    @JohnDoe19754 Місяць тому +23

    Maersk PR Team - Everyone's hating on us right now, we need something subtle to hide our 20$ billion profits.
    CNBC - How about we put the word 'VOLATILE' in title and make you seem like the victim here ?

  • @Dukaamoses
    @Dukaamoses 29 днів тому +2

    Making money is not the same as keeping it there is a reason why investments aren't well taught in schools, the examples you gave are well stationed, the market crisis gave me my first millions, people shy away from hard times, I embrace them.. well at least my advisor does lol.

  • @michaelpatosa
    @michaelpatosa Місяць тому

    Amazing!

  • @advancedbodydesign
    @advancedbodydesign Місяць тому +1

    Q? Why does Maersk get to Privatize Profits but Socialize LOSES?? Same for Insurance Provider....
    I'm not given same treatment when I'm at fault in an auto accident 🙃

  • @KenGray
    @KenGray Місяць тому +6

    When NBC a story on shipping ocean going container ships, it always sounds like a commercial for Maersk for some reason. I would love to see what their advertising budget is like for nbc.

  • @prinnyexplodes
    @prinnyexplodes Місяць тому +31

    CNBC got to collect that Maersk dollars. "Make my image better !! "

    • @Jon.Morimoto
      @Jon.Morimoto Місяць тому +1

      CNBC should do a Boeing infomercial next!

  • @philippesails4973
    @philippesails4973 10 днів тому

    How bad is it that right after the SHanghai index is shown as doubling, the speaker says it is multiplied by 4!

  • @Davethreshold
    @Davethreshold Місяць тому +1

    All fine and well but tell them to check ALL of their ship engines and ships. It was an engine failure that caused the bridge disaster in Baltimore. Further, that same ship/engine flunked its inspection showing the same problem about 1-2 years ago.

    • @SimonTmte
      @SimonTmte Місяць тому +1

      This is a not so interesting theory, you know there'd be some conspiracy theories, some has to do with spase lasers and aliens

  • @anotherelvis
    @anotherelvis 19 днів тому +1

    Maersk also raised the stock dividend, so they don't reinvest all the excess profits.

  • @momen78699
    @momen78699 Місяць тому +1

    Good video keep it up

  • @zikolojii
    @zikolojii Місяць тому +5

    Perfect timing

  • @AndrewLaFon
    @AndrewLaFon 29 днів тому +1

    they navigate the volatile shipping industry by hitting bridges

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 24 дні тому +2

      It was not their ship. It was chartered. Knowledge is power my friend. Sometimes it pays to be better informed.

  • @laveshraj4300
    @laveshraj4300 16 днів тому

    QRyde Public transportation software is a comprehensive digital solution designed to streamline and enhance the efficiency of public transit systems. This software typically includes a range of features tailored to meet the diverse needs of both passengers and transit operators.

  • @brianpambana8115
    @brianpambana8115 Місяць тому +1

    1,5 tonnes of goods are shipped by each person each year

  • @PeterParker-cv2tb
    @PeterParker-cv2tb Місяць тому +4

    10:31 you overlooked the purchase of Martin Bencher !

  • @nagasako7
    @nagasako7 Місяць тому +11

    By not paying any fines for destroying a US Bridge and Hwy...

    • @ebbeb9827
      @ebbeb9827 Місяць тому +2

      didnt their engines fail? if the bridge was built with proper protections perhaps it could have been avoided

    • @alooga555
      @alooga555 Місяць тому +1

      @@ebbeb9827 Cargo ships were so much smaller back in the late 70s.

    • @bzdtemp
      @bzdtemp Місяць тому +6

      Not their ship. Not their crew.

    • @brodriguez11000
      @brodriguez11000 Місяць тому +2

      @@bzdtemp Right. It would be like if an Amazon vehicle crashed into a busload of kids and then blaming everyone who's delivery was on that vehicle.

    • @davidellis279
      @davidellis279 4 дні тому +1

      @@ebbeb9827That bridge would have to have been made substantially better to stand an impact like that,ship’s DONT have brakes,they have an anchor but no brakes and if the engines fail for any reason then things like hitting the bridge is always on the cards or another vessel.

  • @williamlloyd3769
    @williamlloyd3769 Місяць тому +1

    Maersk is just growing up and down the supply chain so as to keep more of their customers cash spend. Makes sense.

  • @JaneTesla-rx7kc
    @JaneTesla-rx7kc Місяць тому +2

    Probably should figure out how to navigate harbors without smashing into bridges.....

    • @henriknielsen1662
      @henriknielsen1662 Місяць тому

      @JaneTesla-rx7kc: The ship that ran into the antique bridge isn't owned by Maersk

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 24 дні тому +1

      It was not their ship. It was chartered. Knowledge is power my friend. Sometimes it pays to be better informed.

  • @trepan4944
    @trepan4944 Місяць тому +58

    CNBC.....the fuq are you guys doing?😂😂😂

    • @dirtymike3329
      @dirtymike3329 Місяць тому +6

      They are not navigating well through these choppy waters

    • @marksmith6632
      @marksmith6632 Місяць тому +4

      They knew we'd click on it😂

  • @amazon4716
    @amazon4716 6 днів тому +1

    Because of Trum p free trade with Mexico
    Our jobs went to Mexic o
    Cargo drivers
    Port jobs.
    Etc.
    Smh.

  • @alessandrobogoni
    @alessandrobogoni 27 днів тому

    Old economy international trade always grow countries production. Long way run.

  • @ferdinandflora6713
    @ferdinandflora6713 23 дні тому

    Good job maersk.

  • @rolandalfonso6954
    @rolandalfonso6954 Місяць тому +2

    This was great. Taught me so much...

  • @auro1986
    @auro1986 Місяць тому

    how? by making shipping industry volatile

  • @MrGoalie2012
    @MrGoalie2012 Місяць тому

    sooooooo buy MAERSK stock?

  • @jackhsiehhautecouture
    @jackhsiehhautecouture 3 дні тому

    But the dip?

  • @user-ww7uq9sf8w
    @user-ww7uq9sf8w Місяць тому +4

    Why is there no talk about them paying to rebuild the bridge and take care of the familys that lost a family member?

    • @ndirangugichuki6260
      @ndirangugichuki6260 Місяць тому +7

      In the video they clearly say that the ship that hit the bridge was chartered by Maersk, it does not belong to them.

    • @carlmller4769
      @carlmller4769 23 дні тому

      Why dpnt you pay for it?

  • @Tjg0719
    @Tjg0719 19 днів тому

    Idu ..a co like maersk can easily afford a defense system with some missiles

  • @randyrrandelson6444
    @randyrrandelson6444 Місяць тому

    Seems like Maersk is creating volatility in the shipping industry.
    Sounds like they have enough bucks rebuild a huge bridge…. or their insurance carrier.

  • @TheOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
    @TheOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Місяць тому +16

    You guys didn't think to get any comment from Maersk regarding the bridge collapse in Baltimore?

    • @bzdtemp
      @bzdtemp Місяць тому +5

      Why would they, it is just a footnote in what the video is about. Besides Maersk has commented on the accident, had it been their ship then it would have impacted them more directly.

  • @Zdawd
    @Zdawd 28 днів тому

    How will they deal with less than record breaking profits??? What a catastrophe!

  • @user-cw1fx2bw1e
    @user-cw1fx2bw1e Місяць тому

    Because ships weren't using synthetic fuel.

  • @howard6433
    @howard6433 Місяць тому +6

    So Maersk leased the ship that took down the Key Bridge in Baltimore, effectively shutting down one of the largest ports in the world....that is how it's navigating the shipping industry?

    • @bzdtemp
      @bzdtemp Місяць тому

      Don't be silly.
      Maersk didn't steer the ship, their people were not on it or anything.
      You conspiracy nonsense is the equivalent of you being responsible for an Uber you called crashing on the way to pick you up.

    • @erikk77
      @erikk77 Місяць тому +2

      It's not one of the largest ports in the world. Nothing like Hong Kong, Shanghai, or Singapore.

    • @youtubetim3577
      @youtubetim3577 Місяць тому

      Another stupid comment, they chartered the ship meaning the ship and its employees are transporting there cargo, do you go after the trucking company or the people that have cargo on the truck in a trucking accident, tool.

    • @henriknielsen1662
      @henriknielsen1662 Місяць тому +1

      @howard6433: Baltimore, like any other US port, is insignificant in a global perspective. The really big container vessels bypass US ports because they are too shallow and their cranes are too small to service them

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 24 дні тому

      It doesn't matter who owns the ship. The shipping company's insurance must cover the damage.

  • @edcastle2345
    @edcastle2345 Місяць тому +22

    Yes, corporate overlords we will do as you command.😂

  • @SeeLasSee
    @SeeLasSee Місяць тому

    It’s such a waste of fuel and hardship on people to raise shipping prices.

  • @keturunankusuma4213
    @keturunankusuma4213 17 днів тому

    8:02

  • @douglasthompson2740
    @douglasthompson2740 28 днів тому

    Always can depend on the cartel's drugs that they ship on a regular basis by the containerload. Then their help in money laundering is a profitable sideline as well. Oh yeah as they rip off the world in shipping fees! I am shedding crocodile tears for poor Maersk.

  • @Ayo22210
    @Ayo22210 Місяць тому

    Why not make them hydrogen powered ships instead of methanol

    • @henriknielsen1662
      @henriknielsen1662 Місяць тому +1

      @Ayo22210: it will come later. Hydrogen technology isn't ready for this yet

  • @asianhobbitshaving3050
    @asianhobbitshaving3050 Місяць тому +3

    Is Maersk responsible for completely destroying the Francis Scott Key Bridge? If so, are they going to compensate the US government for the ineptitude of its maintenance staff, and the reconstruction?

    • @Tola5657
      @Tola5657 Місяць тому +2

      No there not it the ship owner

    • @Tola5657
      @Tola5657 Місяць тому

      @SimonTmte why should this one be different from all other you think so that will happen 🤔

  • @walli6388
    @walli6388 Місяць тому +1

    Hapag-Lloyd❤

    • @ebbeb9827
      @ebbeb9827 Місяць тому +2

      lol why do you love a shipping conglomerate

    • @walli6388
      @walli6388 Місяць тому

      @@ebbeb9827 Because it's an institution here

    • @PopeyedGoose
      @PopeyedGoose Місяць тому

      Also, they pay some of the best dividends on their stocks.
      Last year Mærsk B stock paid a dividend of $600 per stock and Hapag-Lloyd paid $55.
      This year's its down a bit but Mærsk paid $80 per stock and upcoming in May Hapag-Lloyd is giving $35 per share. After I got my Mærsk divided last month, I sold all of my Mærsk stock and bought 400 more stocks of Hapag-Lloyd. Sitting on 484 stocks of Hapag-Lloyd now, waiting for the dividends then I will sell all the stocks and buy Mærsk again to hold onto for a couple years.
      That's why I love the shipping industry.

  • @dlight9849
    @dlight9849 Місяць тому

    My job is processing (data entry) of Sea Waybills all day long. Out of all the carriers listed here, Maersk has the *WORST* Waybills. *HATE MAERSK* 🤬

  • @Alpharizzchad
    @Alpharizzchad 28 днів тому

    By not playing for the bridge they knocked down and killed 6 people 😢

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 24 дні тому +2

      It was not their ship. It was chartered. Knowledge is power my friend. Sometimes it pays to be better informed.

  • @MohamedHassan-nq5pd
    @MohamedHassan-nq5pd Місяць тому +2

    MSK is just trying get rid of the forwarders.

  • @rok0sbasili5k
    @rok0sbasili5k 20 днів тому +1

    Trump living in CNBC's head rent free 😂

  • @gumroller9617
    @gumroller9617 11 днів тому

    not one interesting picture, all is stock footage. Containers, container ship, container terminals all the time... Low budget films a lot on CNBC.

  • @moneeb343
    @moneeb343 Місяць тому +5

    "They're buying up air freight, they're buying up terminals, they're buying up trucking companies"
    "The Sherman Act also makes it illegal to monopolize, conspire to monopolize, or attempt to monopolize a market for products or services. An unlawful monopoly exists when one firm has market power for a product or service, and it has obtained or maintained that market power, not through competition on the merits, but because the firm has suppressed competition by engaging in anticompetitive conduct"

    • @walli6388
      @walli6388 Місяць тому +1

      They still don't have a monopoly

    • @ankurito3746
      @ankurito3746 Місяць тому +1

      they're not even the 2nd biggest shipping container company in the world, how can they have a monopoloy?

    • @dylanslagh851
      @dylanslagh851 Місяць тому +1

      most idiotic comment award

    • @bzdtemp
      @bzdtemp Місяць тому +1

      Explain how 20% of a market = monopoly.
      Maersk is a very big company, but they are nowhere near being a monopoly or having market control.

    • @JanBruunAndersen
      @JanBruunAndersen Місяць тому

      I know that it might come as a surprise to you, but this Sherman Act has no legal consequences outside USA, despite all your wet dreams. It is of no consequence in Denmark 🇩🇰 where Mærsk is headquartered.
      At it's worst, it could negatively impact a US subsidiary which mostly exists to provide auxiliary transport capacity for the US military.

  • @amazon4716
    @amazon4716 6 днів тому +1

    😂 that true. Trum. p family
    I guess they didn't give them a good deal like
    M e x ic o and Indi @ 😅
    I am still paying for the wall ( Mex)
    I am still funding Russi @ (indi)
    The two nation T r u m . P wanted people to invest in 😅 (Mex and indi)
    😂😅😂😅😂😅😂😅😂😅😂

  • @MISHALAHMEDALSAYED-vr3ju
    @MISHALAHMEDALSAYED-vr3ju Місяць тому

    لن أتردد بملاحقة اي كان متورط بالأرهاب لو التبليغ هذا يكفي بزرع الرعب داخل الأرهاب ستأتي الحكومة الأمريكية الجديدة وستفتك في بطن من تدخل يده بالأرهاب الدولي وإذا كانت في تسوية المن باهض يعني في كذا الحالتين يخنس الأرهاب وتفتح خوازنه ومؤخرته

  • @amazon4716
    @amazon4716 6 днів тому +1

    T r u m p
    Lead us to inflation
    Higher taxes on other nations
    Lead us to pay more.
    Smh.

  • @PedalToTheMetal61888
    @PedalToTheMetal61888 12 днів тому +1

    .... WHILE TICKER/SYMBOL- AMKAF JUST SIT THERE IDLE LIKE ZIM DANA SHIPPING HANJIN AND NUMEROUS OTHERS I DON''T CARE TO MENTION WHERES MY $$$ $$$ $$$ ...

  • @fitshamer
    @fitshamer Місяць тому

    Maybe they should invest in their shops with all their profits. If the ship in Baltimore had been maintained properly it probably wouldn't have crashed

    • @dlight9849
      @dlight9849 Місяць тому +2

      Maersk doesn't own that ship. They were chartering that ship. Just like if you rent a limo - would you blame the passenger for the driver's behaviour or mechanic's work?

    • @fitshamer
      @fitshamer Місяць тому

      @@dlight9849 I would expect a shipping company with the means would do their due diligence to make sure their cargo is secured on a ship that doesn't have major mechanical problems. Maersk makes money by getting stuff from A to B. If the ship hits the bridge, then no point B.
      Not sure why you say blame would go to the passenger. That's not really how this works. It's more like this:
      If your Uber breaks down on the side of the road, do you blame the driver or the platform? Even if the driver didn't maintain their car, Uber is still responsible for getting me to my location and compensating me for my time. Therefore it's in Uber's best interest to hire drivers with well maintained cars.
      The video says Maersk made $billions in profit, all I'm saying is they should spend some of that cheddar on making sure the vessels they employ are up to the job.

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 24 дні тому +1

      Knowledge is power my friend. Unfortunately, you have neither of the one nor the other. Sometimes it pays to be better informed before you make a fool of yourself here.

    • @fitshamer
      @fitshamer 24 дні тому

      @@gerhardma4297 yes, the life and death consequences of UA-cam comments! So very serious! 😮

  • @RichardKing-sx6xc
    @RichardKing-sx6xc Місяць тому

    Long on $AMKBY... 😎👌

  • @CosmeAlvarenga-ep5yi
    @CosmeAlvarenga-ep5yi 7 днів тому

    ategyrtWow interesting, I'm going to practice this s

  • @SilasDogopiaDogopia
    @SilasDogopiaDogopia 20 днів тому +1

    Silas dogopia

  • @TheChiefEng
    @TheChiefEng 21 день тому

    It's incredible that so many people are so hopelessly ignorant when it comes to understanding what it means to charter a ship.
    When you charter a ship, it's the equivalent to hire a FedEx airplane to transport your shipment. That's what a charter is.
    Maersk charter a ship to sail with their cargo. The ship is not owned by Maersk, the crew is not Maersk etc. Maersk has nothing to do with the chartered ship other than telling them where the ship needs to sail.
    However, the ignorance displayed by so many people and especially in America seems to suggest that education in America is pretty poor.
    Maersk grew a lot when they bought up among other things American shipping and harbor facilities when they could not manage to operate their companies with a profit so now, Maersk are in the position where they pretty much own stakes in the entire shipping process from containers, trucks, ships, harbor facilities etc. However, they also always check for options to find the best way to earn more and sometimes that includes renting space on ships, trains, trucks and airplanes owned by other companies.
    Maersk are not unique in that respect. All major shipping companies do that. If you are not flexible, you will get hurt financially.

  • @Shipspotting_Vietnam
    @Shipspotting_Vietnam 24 дні тому

    Great video!

  • @SilasDogopiaDogopia
    @SilasDogopiaDogopia 19 днів тому

    Bosku

  • @panama-canada
    @panama-canada Місяць тому

    Vertical integration.

  • @user-tg2iq5wd6i
    @user-tg2iq5wd6i Місяць тому

    Save your $ buy American 😊

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 24 дні тому

      Exactly, the crap that is produced in the USA for twice the price.

  • @powerofshah3
    @powerofshah3 Місяць тому +1

    Msdnc can't make a small documentry without trashing trump somehow lol

    • @RealAnthonyJones
      @RealAnthonyJones Місяць тому

      His policy of being anti China is expensive for you. Facts don’t care about your feelings.

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 24 дні тому

      If you make a comment, you should at least know who made the report you just looked at. Who is msdnc, please?

  • @orangejjay
    @orangejjay Місяць тому +2

    Nice to see CNBC doing their best to help Maersk and their propaganda machine. 😂

  • @Deshbhakt-hx9du
    @Deshbhakt-hx9du 19 днів тому

    ❤😂😂🎉🎉🎉😂😂❤❤😂🎉🎉🎉😂😂❤❤😂🎉🎉

  • @user-ru6uq7dy3p
    @user-ru6uq7dy3p 24 дні тому

    HI good morning
    Indian Ocean
    C TARDE MARK
    EC. CE AB BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT LOW
    INDIAN OCEAN ASIA BUSINESS
    C. C. SEE YOU

  • @PulseNews-gu9fe
    @PulseNews-gu9fe Місяць тому +2

    Imagine yourself. The probability that we see the world as it is is zero.
    the world you perceive is just a screen behind which it is convenient to live. The real world or the truth is so complex that evolution itself has tried to make sure that we never find out what lies behind the partition.

  • @thomasbrown6970
    @thomasbrown6970 Місяць тому

    This video is already out dated.

  • @BOOSTED98GT
    @BOOSTED98GT 25 днів тому

    TDS. 😂

  • @alexandreablalock7997
    @alexandreablalock7997 Місяць тому

    I'm early 😊

  • @MohammedAli-mt9kd
    @MohammedAli-mt9kd Місяць тому

    America is over.

  • @pxd291
    @pxd291 Місяць тому +1

    Maersk is just HORRIBLE

  • @Francinagatti_dec
    @Francinagatti_dec Місяць тому +80

    Maersk PR Team - Everyone's hating on us right now, we need something subtle to hide our 20$ billion profits.
    CNBC - How about we put the word 'VOLATILE' in title and make you seem like the victim here ?

    • @crowonthepowerlines
      @crowonthepowerlines Місяць тому

      I just don't understand how news organizations expect us to see them as credible when they wear their biases (for anyone who pays them) on their sleeves...

    • @mirzaahmed6589
      @mirzaahmed6589 Місяць тому +6

      Who's hating on Maersk? Most people outside of transport and supply chain geeks have never even heard of it.

    • @random-kc8gx
      @random-kc8gx Місяць тому +2

      These shipping companies played a key role in post covid inflation, specifically for developing countries. Never seen before freight charges and never seen before profits. I had to pay $6000 usd for shipping something when normally the rate would be closer to a $1000 usd

    • @O13x11
      @O13x11 17 днів тому

      @@random-kc8gx because you have only 2 major ports in US which was chocked because reasons and ships were staying for up to 1 month on anchorage in a queue for berthing.

  • @SilasDogopiaDogopia
    @SilasDogopiaDogopia 20 днів тому

    Silas dogopia