How Maersk Is Navigating The Volatile Shipping Industry

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 186

  • @youtubetim3577
    @youtubetim3577 7 місяців тому +122

    These comments annoy me so bad, do people even listen or try to understand before commenting. Maersk chartered the ship meaning the other company owns ship, has crew on ship and hauling maersk cargo. In a trucking accident do you blame driver and trucking company or the people that own the boxes on the truck... my gosh, and the people saying ripping people off the shipping rates been so bad barely any profits last number of quarters, love how people expect every company to be a charity case except tech but perfectly fine having apple rip you off charging 1400 dollars for a phone that costs them 10 bucks.

    • @brodriguez11000
      @brodriguez11000 7 місяців тому +3

      I own an Android. ;-)

    • @nothisispatrick8001
      @nothisispatrick8001 7 місяців тому

      I guess most people don't care, people died in an accident and they want someone to blame and a "greedy" global company is perfect...

    • @laviefu0630
      @laviefu0630 7 місяців тому +1

      Thank you for your righteous insight, couldn't agree more.

    • @dimosfakiris8914
      @dimosfakiris8914 7 місяців тому

      Completely agree with you on that. It's also mind blowing to me that when they have some surplus ships, they immediately call it a huge problem. But then when there's a need to scale up operations quickly (such as going around Africa) they say that's what helps them keep operating. Sounds like we're trying to run out of fuel as soon as the plane lands with the planning of these people. Surely a surplus of capacity should be preferred for that exact reason (something happens and there's an immediate need for ships). It's the exact same problem in the airline industry at the moment and it's absolutely mind blowing to me that all these years, no one thinks of any amount of redundancy/spike in demand/other issue and plans for it.

    • @xienjougao3131
      @xienjougao3131 7 місяців тому +1

      agree! expensive price for that carrier with hidden charges and will go to just advertisement which all carriers do but they spend more.

  • @FrancisJohnson-h7g
    @FrancisJohnson-h7g 6 місяців тому +6

    Thank you very much for such a detailed review, now I know exactly what I need.

  • @jitansharora779
    @jitansharora779 5 місяців тому +5

    Awesome Story. This should be a detailed 30-45 minutes documentary

  • @catwbongos
    @catwbongos 7 місяців тому +175

    You guys have to be trolling right now by also releasing this video

    • @SuperPerfectMan
      @SuperPerfectMan 7 місяців тому +9

      Why ?

    • @SlightlyOddFilms
      @SlightlyOddFilms 7 місяців тому +6

      @@SuperPerfectManbruh, seriously?

    • @achalvyas90
      @achalvyas90 7 місяців тому +11

      Sounds like a sponsored gig, right??

    • @dirtymike3329
      @dirtymike3329 7 місяців тому +28

      @@SuperPerfectMan A Maersk ship destroyed a major bridge in Baltimore recently

    • @beaniemac
      @beaniemac 7 місяців тому +11

      I was thinking the same thing. That key bridge accident is going to cost them billions

  • @user-xh8wi3ce1i
    @user-xh8wi3ce1i 7 місяців тому +2

    Very informative thanks

  • @Paul-e9x4h
    @Paul-e9x4h Місяць тому +1

    Industri dalam pelayaran ini memegang peranan paling penting dalam pengiriman barang ekspor/ import antar negara maupun benua yang melintasi samodera dan lautan luas . Hal ini tentunya juga membutuhkan fitur keamanan dalam jalur jalur lalu lintas yang penuh resiko baik dari faktor internal dan faktor eksternal sistem navigasi perairan . Untuk itu diperlukan juga berbagai cara dan upaya untuk selalu meningkatkan inovasi inovasi baru dalam menggandakan fitur keamanan

    • @YIHAOWang-h8u
      @YIHAOWang-h8u Місяць тому +1

      您好,我叫 Andrew。我是一名来自中国的专业国际货运代理,能够提供最合适的路线并回答与进口、出口和运输相关的问题。

  • @ferdinandflora6713
    @ferdinandflora6713 7 місяців тому +1

    Good job maersk.

  • @zikolojii
    @zikolojii 7 місяців тому +6

    Perfect timing

  • @rolandalfonso6954
    @rolandalfonso6954 7 місяців тому +3

    This was great. Taught me so much...

  • @momo99123
    @momo99123 7 місяців тому +3

    Good video keep it up

  • @Shipspotting_Vietnam
    @Shipspotting_Vietnam 7 місяців тому +1

    Great video!

  • @michaelpatosa
    @michaelpatosa 7 місяців тому +1

    Amazing!

  • @Dukaamoses
    @Dukaamoses 7 місяців тому +2

    Making money is not the same as keeping it there is a reason why investments aren't well taught in schools, the examples you gave are well stationed, the market crisis gave me my first millions, people shy away from hard times, I embrace them.. well at least my advisor does lol.

  • @brianpambana8115
    @brianpambana8115 7 місяців тому +3

    1,5 tonnes of goods are shipped by each person each year

  • @anotherelvis
    @anotherelvis 7 місяців тому +2

    Maersk also raised the stock dividend, so they don't reinvest all the excess profits.

  • @PeterParker-cv2tb
    @PeterParker-cv2tb 7 місяців тому +7

    10:31 you overlooked the purchase of Martin Bencher !

  • @JohnDoe19754
    @JohnDoe19754 7 місяців тому +25

    Maersk PR Team - Everyone's hating on us right now, we need something subtle to hide our 20$ billion profits.
    CNBC - How about we put the word 'VOLATILE' in title and make you seem like the victim here ?

  • @AndrewLaFon
    @AndrewLaFon 7 місяців тому +4

    they navigate the volatile shipping industry by hitting bridges

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 7 місяців тому +4

      It was not their ship. It was chartered. Knowledge is power my friend. Sometimes it pays to be better informed.

  • @_Vancelvany_
    @_Vancelvany_ 7 місяців тому +9

    This freight ship lines are a huge factor on why our consumer goods are going up.
    Maersk & others have increased the freight prices which is then passed on to us to maintain their OR...
    What we're about to see is a shift in logistics, especially in NA, with the likes of Maersk doing M&A's and then investments in Mexico that is becoming the battleground for end-to-end logistics.
    Honestly, the only takeaway here is until North American logistics stabilizes post-shift away from China and leverages fully the USMCA in trade, Maersk & the likes will continue to make bank & eat up all the smaller companies in every facet of the supply chain LOL

    • @youtubetim3577
      @youtubetim3577 7 місяців тому

      Are you dumb? Go look at shipping profits in 2023 and this year so far its been barely profitable, most aren't even paying out dividends of any sort atm cause so bad, last year I made almost 15,000 dollars in dividends and this year will not even be 1,000. Try looking at a balance sheet of profits before you talk trash

    • @pjacobsen1000
      @pjacobsen1000 7 місяців тому +3

      "This freight ship lines are a huge factor on why our consumer goods are going up."
      A 40' container can hold 10,000 laptops. It costs US$ 3,000 to ship from China to US west coast. That equates to 30 cents per laptop. It used to cost only 10 cents per laptop computer, so yes, the price of your MacBook has gone up 20 cents due to these evil, greedy container shipping companies. Your claim that shipping is a 'huge factor' is simply false. The reality is that a very large part of the price of many goods is due to advertising and marketing. A huge proportion. For known brands, it's probably over 30% of the price you pay that goes to advertisers. But without advertising and marketing, you probably wouldn't buy the product in the first place.

    • @youtubetim3577
      @youtubetim3577 7 місяців тому

      @pjacobsen1000 yep rates haven't went up sense the 90s basically, yet people crying a river. Reminds me of gas people crying a river when up 10 cents a gallon in 10 years and same time pay 10 bucks a day for Starbucks coffee, hilarious how things needed to survive go up price people freak out while same time let apple charge them 1400 for a new phone that costs them 50 bucks to make and need a upgrade every year... fact is they think companies for living essentials should be a charity case to them and not profitable while same time fine that apple and these other places rip them off.. people screwed up

  • @prinnyexplodes
    @prinnyexplodes 7 місяців тому +33

    CNBC got to collect that Maersk dollars. "Make my image better !! "

    • @Jon.Morimoto
      @Jon.Morimoto 7 місяців тому +1

      CNBC should do a Boeing infomercial next!

  • @doodskie999
    @doodskie999 7 місяців тому +9

    Ah Maersk, making a bridge from ocean to ocean
    Well sometimes destroying it 😂

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 7 місяців тому +2

      It was not their ship. It was chartered. Knowledge is power my friend. Sometimes it pays to be better informed.

  • @Davethreshold
    @Davethreshold 7 місяців тому +2

    All fine and well but tell them to check ALL of their ship engines and ships. It was an engine failure that caused the bridge disaster in Baltimore. Further, that same ship/engine flunked its inspection showing the same problem about 1-2 years ago.

    • @SimonTmte
      @SimonTmte 7 місяців тому +1

      This is a not so interesting theory, you know there'd be some conspiracy theories, some has to do with spase lasers and aliens

  • @OwenAlekos-mh7yw
    @OwenAlekos-mh7yw 7 місяців тому +2

    Is Maersk actually Samsung?
    Dpworld stands for danish port world?

  • @alessandrobogoni
    @alessandrobogoni 7 місяців тому +1

    Old economy international trade always grow countries production. Long way run.

  • @KenGray
    @KenGray 7 місяців тому +10

    When NBC a story on shipping ocean going container ships, it always sounds like a commercial for Maersk for some reason. I would love to see what their advertising budget is like for nbc.

  • @laveshraj4300
    @laveshraj4300 7 місяців тому

    QRyde Public transportation software is a comprehensive digital solution designed to streamline and enhance the efficiency of public transit systems. This software typically includes a range of features tailored to meet the diverse needs of both passengers and transit operators.

  • @EcomCarl
    @EcomCarl 7 місяців тому +1

    Maersk's strategic diversification into air freight and last-mile delivery is a smart move in navigating the unpredictable waters of global trade. This holistic approach not only mitigates risks but also enhances their ability to adapt to rapidly changing market dynamics. 🚢

  • @AndrewLambert-wi8et
    @AndrewLambert-wi8et 2 місяці тому +2

    PROFITS 30 BILLION USA DOLLARS. WE OWN DENMARK. 60% OF CARGO IS ELECTRONICS.

  • @VerticalARC201
    @VerticalARC201 Місяць тому

    The only thing i think that this shipping industry can manifest good navigting system is to reverse the loop of the industry. For example if 1 vessel cannot be out of the country for more than the time that it is enter to the port, the best is to bargain the container for at least 3/4 of the total volume when it comes to the custom standard. It will give the vessel to unload the container as far as the agreement of the custom port authority. It means that i will settle the losses of time and the vessel will surely have a credit or will be given a safety conduct pass to navigate again to the point of origin that will tower the neibhoring nation that the vessel is permited a free of navigation to navigate the sea water.

  • @SlightlyOddFilms
    @SlightlyOddFilms 7 місяців тому +36

    They are navigating through key supports to avoid collapse

    • @MR-04
      @MR-04 7 місяців тому +7

      Just because you don't like the company for no apparent reason doesn't mean a ship they chartered (Borrowed/Lent) to another company is their responsibility. Like when you rent a car then that vehicle is YOUR responsibility and NOT theirs!

    • @SlightlyOddFilms
      @SlightlyOddFilms 7 місяців тому

      @@MR-04 it was a joke

  • @go-ek7sg
    @go-ek7sg 7 місяців тому +4

    9:22 Why is the company name on the ship blurred out?

    • @rinoohhighskilled7236
      @rinoohhighskilled7236 7 місяців тому

      its their competitor Evergreen ;)

    • @mattygaga2013
      @mattygaga2013 7 місяців тому +1

      It's the NYK LINE and the ship I believe is the NYK LYRA. A Japanese based shipping company.

    • @mattygaga2013
      @mattygaga2013 7 місяців тому

      ​@@rinoohhighskilled7236nope, it's NYK LINE and the ship is the NYK LYRA I believe.

  • @CaptRR
    @CaptRR 7 місяців тому +5

    They could start by not navigating into bridges.

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 7 місяців тому +1

      It was not their ship. It was chartered. Knowledge is power my friend. Sometimes it pays to be better informed.

  • @trepan4944
    @trepan4944 7 місяців тому +59

    CNBC.....the fuq are you guys doing?😂😂😂

    • @dirtymike3329
      @dirtymike3329 7 місяців тому +6

      They are not navigating well through these choppy waters

    • @marksmith6632
      @marksmith6632 7 місяців тому +4

      They knew we'd click on it😂

  • @advancedbodydesign
    @advancedbodydesign 7 місяців тому +1

    Q? Why does Maersk get to Privatize Profits but Socialize LOSES?? Same for Insurance Provider....
    I'm not given same treatment when I'm at fault in an auto accident 🙃

  • @philippesails4973
    @philippesails4973 7 місяців тому +1

    How bad is it that right after the SHanghai index is shown as doubling, the speaker says it is multiplied by 4!

  • @mattygaga2013
    @mattygaga2013 7 місяців тому +4

    9:22 the ship that is blurred out is NYK LINE and is the NYK LYRA. Not sure why CNBC blurred it out.

  • @tubby_1278
    @tubby_1278 7 місяців тому +5

    Those ships are like cities and imagine working on em.

    • @catatonicbug7522
      @catatonicbug7522 7 місяців тому

      They are surprisingly simple. Only a handful of people onboard each one.

  • @williamlloyd3769
    @williamlloyd3769 7 місяців тому +1

    Maersk is just growing up and down the supply chain so as to keep more of their customers cash spend. Makes sense.

  • @edcastle2345
    @edcastle2345 7 місяців тому +22

    Yes, corporate overlords we will do as you command.😂

  • @nagasako7
    @nagasako7 7 місяців тому +13

    By not paying any fines for destroying a US Bridge and Hwy...

    • @jebbo-c1l
      @jebbo-c1l 7 місяців тому +3

      didnt their engines fail? if the bridge was built with proper protections perhaps it could have been avoided

    • @alooga555
      @alooga555 7 місяців тому +2

      @@jebbo-c1l Cargo ships were so much smaller back in the late 70s.

    • @bzdtemp
      @bzdtemp 7 місяців тому +7

      Not their ship. Not their crew.

    • @brodriguez11000
      @brodriguez11000 7 місяців тому +3

      @@bzdtemp Right. It would be like if an Amazon vehicle crashed into a busload of kids and then blaming everyone who's delivery was on that vehicle.

    • @davidellis279
      @davidellis279 6 місяців тому +1

      @@jebbo-c1lThat bridge would have to have been made substantially better to stand an impact like that,ship’s DONT have brakes,they have an anchor but no brakes and if the engines fail for any reason then things like hitting the bridge is always on the cards or another vessel.

  • @JaneTesla-rx7kc
    @JaneTesla-rx7kc 7 місяців тому +3

    Probably should figure out how to navigate harbors without smashing into bridges.....

    • @henriknielsen1662
      @henriknielsen1662 7 місяців тому

      @JaneTesla-rx7kc: The ship that ran into the antique bridge isn't owned by Maersk

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 7 місяців тому +1

      It was not their ship. It was chartered. Knowledge is power my friend. Sometimes it pays to be better informed.

  • @YIHAOWang-h8u
    @YIHAOWang-h8u Місяць тому

    您好,我叫 Andrew。我是一名来自中国的专业国际货运代理,能够提供最合适的路线并回答与进口、出口和运输相关的问题。

  • @craumm
    @craumm 7 місяців тому +7

    "1.5 tonnes of goods are shipped by ship per person each year" WOW! I never ordered so much stuff from Amazon!

    • @ricke3939
      @ricke3939 7 місяців тому

      This figure also includes (in fact the majority is) commodities such as oil, fuels, ores, gas, and grain as well as cars, trucks, and other vehicles. Finished goods (which is what is mainly transported in containers) only make up about 20% of all shipping.

  • @amazon4716
    @amazon4716 7 місяців тому +2

    Because of Trum p free trade with Mexico
    Our jobs went to Mexic o
    Cargo drivers
    Port jobs.
    Etc.
    Smh.

  • @TheOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
    @TheOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 7 місяців тому +16

    You guys didn't think to get any comment from Maersk regarding the bridge collapse in Baltimore?

    • @bzdtemp
      @bzdtemp 7 місяців тому +6

      Why would they, it is just a footnote in what the video is about. Besides Maersk has commented on the accident, had it been their ship then it would have impacted them more directly.

  • @Zdawd
    @Zdawd 7 місяців тому

    How will they deal with less than record breaking profits??? What a catastrophe!

  • @MrGoalie2012
    @MrGoalie2012 7 місяців тому

    sooooooo buy MAERSK stock?

  • @Tribipentium325
    @Tribipentium325 7 місяців тому

    Because ships weren't using synthetic fuel.

  • @auro1986
    @auro1986 7 місяців тому

    how? by making shipping industry volatile

  • @SeeLasSee
    @SeeLasSee 7 місяців тому

    It’s such a waste of fuel and hardship on people to raise shipping prices.

  • @jackhsiehhautecouture
    @jackhsiehhautecouture 6 місяців тому

    But the dip?

  • @howard6433
    @howard6433 7 місяців тому +6

    So Maersk leased the ship that took down the Key Bridge in Baltimore, effectively shutting down one of the largest ports in the world....that is how it's navigating the shipping industry?

    • @bzdtemp
      @bzdtemp 7 місяців тому

      Don't be silly.
      Maersk didn't steer the ship, their people were not on it or anything.
      You conspiracy nonsense is the equivalent of you being responsible for an Uber you called crashing on the way to pick you up.

    • @erikk77
      @erikk77 7 місяців тому +2

      It's not one of the largest ports in the world. Nothing like Hong Kong, Shanghai, or Singapore.

    • @youtubetim3577
      @youtubetim3577 7 місяців тому

      Another stupid comment, they chartered the ship meaning the ship and its employees are transporting there cargo, do you go after the trucking company or the people that have cargo on the truck in a trucking accident, tool.

    • @henriknielsen1662
      @henriknielsen1662 7 місяців тому +1

      @howard6433: Baltimore, like any other US port, is insignificant in a global perspective. The really big container vessels bypass US ports because they are too shallow and their cranes are too small to service them

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 7 місяців тому

      It doesn't matter who owns the ship. The shipping company's insurance must cover the damage.

  • @rok0sbasili5k
    @rok0sbasili5k 7 місяців тому +1

    Trump living in CNBC's head rent free 😂

  • @randyrrandelson6444
    @randyrrandelson6444 7 місяців тому

    Seems like Maersk is creating volatility in the shipping industry.
    Sounds like they have enough bucks rebuild a huge bridge…. or their insurance carrier.

  • @RichardKing-sx6xc
    @RichardKing-sx6xc 7 місяців тому

    Long on $AMKBY... 😎👌

  • @dlight9849
    @dlight9849 7 місяців тому

    My job is processing (data entry) of Sea Waybills all day long. Out of all the carriers listed here, Maersk has the *WORST* Waybills. *HATE MAERSK* 🤬

  • @douglasthompson2740
    @douglasthompson2740 7 місяців тому

    Always can depend on the cartel's drugs that they ship on a regular basis by the containerload. Then their help in money laundering is a profitable sideline as well. Oh yeah as they rip off the world in shipping fees! I am shedding crocodile tears for poor Maersk.

  • @asianhobbitshaving3050
    @asianhobbitshaving3050 7 місяців тому +3

    Is Maersk responsible for completely destroying the Francis Scott Key Bridge? If so, are they going to compensate the US government for the ineptitude of its maintenance staff, and the reconstruction?

    • @Tola5657
      @Tola5657 7 місяців тому +2

      No there not it the ship owner

    • @Tola5657
      @Tola5657 7 місяців тому

      @SimonTmte why should this one be different from all other you think so that will happen 🤔

  • @walli6388
    @walli6388 7 місяців тому +1

    Hapag-Lloyd❤

    • @jebbo-c1l
      @jebbo-c1l 7 місяців тому +2

      lol why do you love a shipping conglomerate

    • @walli6388
      @walli6388 7 місяців тому

      @@jebbo-c1l Because it's an institution here

    • @PopeyedGoose
      @PopeyedGoose 7 місяців тому

      Also, they pay some of the best dividends on their stocks.
      Last year Mærsk B stock paid a dividend of $600 per stock and Hapag-Lloyd paid $55.
      This year's its down a bit but Mærsk paid $80 per stock and upcoming in May Hapag-Lloyd is giving $35 per share. After I got my Mærsk divided last month, I sold all of my Mærsk stock and bought 400 more stocks of Hapag-Lloyd. Sitting on 484 stocks of Hapag-Lloyd now, waiting for the dividends then I will sell all the stocks and buy Mærsk again to hold onto for a couple years.
      That's why I love the shipping industry.

  • @RhettLewis-t3e
    @RhettLewis-t3e 7 місяців тому +4

    Why is there no talk about them paying to rebuild the bridge and take care of the familys that lost a family member?

    • @ndirangugichuki6260
      @ndirangugichuki6260 7 місяців тому +7

      In the video they clearly say that the ship that hit the bridge was chartered by Maersk, it does not belong to them.

    • @carlmller4769
      @carlmller4769 7 місяців тому

      Why dpnt you pay for it?

  • @Ayo22210
    @Ayo22210 7 місяців тому

    Why not make them hydrogen powered ships instead of methanol

    • @henriknielsen1662
      @henriknielsen1662 7 місяців тому +1

      @Ayo22210: it will come later. Hydrogen technology isn't ready for this yet

  • @Alpharizzchad
    @Alpharizzchad 7 місяців тому

    By not playing for the bridge they knocked down and killed 6 people 😢

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 7 місяців тому +3

      It was not their ship. It was chartered. Knowledge is power my friend. Sometimes it pays to be better informed.

  • @ИринаКим-ъ5ч
    @ИринаКим-ъ5ч Місяць тому

    Martinez Angela Allen Maria Robinson Donna

  • @panama-canada
    @panama-canada 7 місяців тому

    Vertical integration.

  • @PedalToTheMetal61888
    @PedalToTheMetal61888 7 місяців тому +1

    .... WHILE TICKER/SYMBOL- AMKAF JUST SIT THERE IDLE LIKE ZIM DANA SHIPPING HANJIN AND NUMEROUS OTHERS I DON''T CARE TO MENTION WHERES MY $$$ $$$ $$$ ...

  • @amazon4716
    @amazon4716 7 місяців тому +1

    😂 that true. Trum. p family
    I guess they didn't give them a good deal like
    M e x ic o and Indi @ 😅
    I am still paying for the wall ( Mex)
    I am still funding Russi @ (indi)
    The two nation T r u m . P wanted people to invest in 😅 (Mex and indi)
    😂😅😂😅😂😅😂😅😂😅😂

  • @SilasDogopiaDogopia
    @SilasDogopiaDogopia 7 місяців тому +1

    Silas dogopia

  • @johnsiebesma
    @johnsiebesma 7 місяців тому

    Save your $ buy American 😊

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 7 місяців тому

      Exactly, the crap that is produced in the USA for twice the price.

  • @amazon4716
    @amazon4716 7 місяців тому +1

    T r u m p
    Lead us to inflation
    Higher taxes on other nations
    Lead us to pay more.
    Smh.

  • @ИринаКим-ъ5ч
    @ИринаКим-ъ5ч Місяць тому

    Wilson Edward Moore Susan Clark Shirley

  • @gumroller9617
    @gumroller9617 7 місяців тому

    not one interesting picture, all is stock footage. Containers, container ship, container terminals all the time... Low budget films a lot on CNBC.

  • @powerofshah3
    @powerofshah3 7 місяців тому +1

    Msdnc can't make a small documentry without trashing trump somehow lol

    • @RealAnthonyJones
      @RealAnthonyJones 7 місяців тому

      His policy of being anti China is expensive for you. Facts don’t care about your feelings.

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 7 місяців тому

      If you make a comment, you should at least know who made the report you just looked at. Who is msdnc, please?

  • @keturunankusuma
    @keturunankusuma 7 місяців тому

    8:02

  • @moneeb343
    @moneeb343 7 місяців тому +5

    "They're buying up air freight, they're buying up terminals, they're buying up trucking companies"
    "The Sherman Act also makes it illegal to monopolize, conspire to monopolize, or attempt to monopolize a market for products or services. An unlawful monopoly exists when one firm has market power for a product or service, and it has obtained or maintained that market power, not through competition on the merits, but because the firm has suppressed competition by engaging in anticompetitive conduct"

    • @walli6388
      @walli6388 7 місяців тому +1

      They still don't have a monopoly

    • @ankurito3746
      @ankurito3746 7 місяців тому +1

      they're not even the 2nd biggest shipping container company in the world, how can they have a monopoloy?

    • @dylanslagh851
      @dylanslagh851 7 місяців тому +1

      most idiotic comment award

    • @bzdtemp
      @bzdtemp 7 місяців тому +1

      Explain how 20% of a market = monopoly.
      Maersk is a very big company, but they are nowhere near being a monopoly or having market control.

    • @JanBruunAndersen
      @JanBruunAndersen 7 місяців тому

      I know that it might come as a surprise to you, but this Sherman Act has no legal consequences outside USA, despite all your wet dreams. It is of no consequence in Denmark 🇩🇰 where Mærsk is headquartered.
      At it's worst, it could negatively impact a US subsidiary which mostly exists to provide auxiliary transport capacity for the US military.

  • @orangejjay
    @orangejjay 7 місяців тому +2

    Nice to see CNBC doing their best to help Maersk and their propaganda machine. 😂

  • @MohammedAli-mt9kd
    @MohammedAli-mt9kd 7 місяців тому

    America is over.

  • @fitshamer
    @fitshamer 7 місяців тому

    Maybe they should invest in their shops with all their profits. If the ship in Baltimore had been maintained properly it probably wouldn't have crashed

    • @dlight9849
      @dlight9849 7 місяців тому +2

      Maersk doesn't own that ship. They were chartering that ship. Just like if you rent a limo - would you blame the passenger for the driver's behaviour or mechanic's work?

    • @fitshamer
      @fitshamer 7 місяців тому

      @@dlight9849 I would expect a shipping company with the means would do their due diligence to make sure their cargo is secured on a ship that doesn't have major mechanical problems. Maersk makes money by getting stuff from A to B. If the ship hits the bridge, then no point B.
      Not sure why you say blame would go to the passenger. That's not really how this works. It's more like this:
      If your Uber breaks down on the side of the road, do you blame the driver or the platform? Even if the driver didn't maintain their car, Uber is still responsible for getting me to my location and compensating me for my time. Therefore it's in Uber's best interest to hire drivers with well maintained cars.
      The video says Maersk made $billions in profit, all I'm saying is they should spend some of that cheddar on making sure the vessels they employ are up to the job.

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 7 місяців тому +1

      Knowledge is power my friend. Unfortunately, you have neither of the one nor the other. Sometimes it pays to be better informed before you make a fool of yourself here.

    • @fitshamer
      @fitshamer 7 місяців тому

      @@gerhardma4297 yes, the life and death consequences of UA-cam comments! So very serious! 😮

  • @thomasbrown6970
    @thomasbrown6970 7 місяців тому

    This video is already out dated.

  • @MikeTule-b7h
    @MikeTule-b7h 3 місяці тому

    Can you ship a thought for an iPhone sweety

  • @TheChiefEng
    @TheChiefEng 7 місяців тому

    It's incredible that so many people are so hopelessly ignorant when it comes to understanding what it means to charter a ship.
    When you charter a ship, it's the equivalent to hire a FedEx airplane to transport your shipment. That's what a charter is.
    Maersk charter a ship to sail with their cargo. The ship is not owned by Maersk, the crew is not Maersk etc. Maersk has nothing to do with the chartered ship other than telling them where the ship needs to sail.
    However, the ignorance displayed by so many people and especially in America seems to suggest that education in America is pretty poor.
    Maersk grew a lot when they bought up among other things American shipping and harbor facilities when they could not manage to operate their companies with a profit so now, Maersk are in the position where they pretty much own stakes in the entire shipping process from containers, trucks, ships, harbor facilities etc. However, they also always check for options to find the best way to earn more and sometimes that includes renting space on ships, trains, trucks and airplanes owned by other companies.
    Maersk are not unique in that respect. All major shipping companies do that. If you are not flexible, you will get hurt financially.

  • @CosmeAlvarenga-ep5yi
    @CosmeAlvarenga-ep5yi 7 місяців тому

    ategyrtWow interesting, I'm going to practice this s

  • @Shuoshihua8
    @Shuoshihua8 6 місяців тому

    A pirate company

  • @alexandreablalock7997
    @alexandreablalock7997 7 місяців тому

    I'm early 😊

  • @SilasDogopiaDogopia
    @SilasDogopiaDogopia 7 місяців тому

    Bosku

  • @PulseNews-gu9fe
    @PulseNews-gu9fe 7 місяців тому +2

    Imagine yourself. The probability that we see the world as it is is zero.
    the world you perceive is just a screen behind which it is convenient to live. The real world or the truth is so complex that evolution itself has tried to make sure that we never find out what lies behind the partition.

  • @Deshbhakt-hx9du
    @Deshbhakt-hx9du 7 місяців тому

    ❤😂😂🎉🎉🎉😂😂❤❤😂🎉🎉🎉😂😂❤❤😂🎉🎉

  • @pxd291
    @pxd291 7 місяців тому +1

    Maersk is just HORRIBLE

  • @KingBoy-n8q
    @KingBoy-n8q 7 місяців тому

    HI good morning
    Indian Ocean
    C TARDE MARK
    EC. CE AB BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT LOW
    INDIAN OCEAN ASIA BUSINESS
    C. C. SEE YOU

  • @BOOSTED98GT
    @BOOSTED98GT 7 місяців тому

    TDS. 😂

  • @CLAUDIARIVAS-nf2nx
    @CLAUDIARIVAS-nf2nx Місяць тому

    MAKE OUR WATER CANAL…AND OTHER PASSES SAFE FOR OUR SHIPPING TO TRANSPORT GOOD AND WE CAN LIVE LIFE WITH SUPPLIES , TO BE HEALTHY, HAPPY , AND FULL OF TOURISTS NEVER ALONE !!! 🤩🪖⛑🎓👑🧢👒🎩⛽💚💙❤💛👩🏻‍💻

  • @SilasDogopiaDogopia
    @SilasDogopiaDogopia 7 місяців тому

    Silas dogopia