AI is Scaring Its Own Creators

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 4,3 тис.

  • @some1and297
    @some1and297 Рік тому +1305

    As a data analyst, this is terrifying because you went over the AI generating reports on data from an Excell sheet to make business decisions and I just had a moment where it was like "oh that is my job, I guess I can't get a job anymore".

    • @francefarms
      @francefarms Рік тому +46

      Tuff.

    • @iFluxyy
      @iFluxyy Рік тому +218

      Hopefully you lagging minds see suddenly why UBI may be an important concept in a world where 90% of tasks are automated

    • @garethbaus5471
      @garethbaus5471 Рік тому +91

      If possible see if you could use it as part of your workflow, if you can get good at using the tool before it takes your job you will have a decent chance of maintaining some semblance of normalcy.

    • @AtanasNenov
      @AtanasNenov Рік тому +37

      ​@Clive Sure, but you can't judge from a single person perspective. Some complex analysis might require weeks of several FTEs time right now. Overnight, AI is now able to crunch the data and provide a good analytical basis, so one capable person can finalize the analysis within a day. Once you aggregate all these time savings, it can only equal in less demand for human analysts.

    • @AtanasNenov
      @AtanasNenov Рік тому +6

      @Clive Oh, I am sure it is. For the few who embrace and drive change, this will be a huge opportunity. The others who don't will be (hopefully slowly) shown the door.

  • @jessevw932
    @jessevw932 Рік тому +1653

    We're actually rapidly approaching a crossroads of either a thriving utopia with insane levels of automation or a dystopian hellscape with insane unemployment levels and it's both exciting and terrifying

    • @187onaPigeon
      @187onaPigeon Рік тому

      It will be both. They are trying to cull us already

    • @whirled_peas
      @whirled_peas Рік тому +337

      Any future with AI is a hellscape - Even if AI is wholly “safe” and “benevolent”, anything that serves to bring us unimaginable convenience will lead to the erasure of human culture. We will lose everything and anything that makes human.
      Social interaction will go through the lens of AI to optimise it, difficulties that would usually require humility and growth will be solved automatically. We humans have and always will only grow when necessary, our entire psychology and physiology is based on this premise. If we don’t have to grow, we won’t. If we don’t grow, we die.

    • @jessevw932
      @jessevw932 Рік тому +123

      @@whirled_peas I think this is really looking at it through a business lens, A lot of human interaction that people do for fun is person to person, Growth can happen in more than one way, AI is a tool that can be used for automating meaningless but necessary tasks. There is still plenty of growth that can be done even with AI through other avenues like Art, Science and really any other activity people do for the sake of it.

    • @JorgetePanete
      @JorgetePanete Рік тому +30

      automation->unemployment
      that's good

    • @AtlantiansGaming
      @AtlantiansGaming Рік тому +4

      Why not both?!

  • @Sm1lezX19
    @Sm1lezX19 Рік тому +2954

    Can we just get like a 3 hour video of Luke talking about this stuff or an entire channel maybe?

    • @RaiokIncaris
      @RaiokIncaris Рік тому +180

      I would like this myself. This is going to be an extremely active subject, and we need someone to cover this since it's so wide-scaling in everything it affects. We need someone that actually keeps up on all of this to bring it to the masses, and LMG is the best positioned company to do that

    • @anlumo1
      @anlumo1 Рік тому +75

      I'm all for it! Don't even give Luke a script, just let him ramble on like he did in this video during the bathroom break.

    • @SomeNerd361
      @SomeNerd361 Рік тому +21

      Sounds like a good idea for a Techlonger episode

    • @CrackemLIVE
      @CrackemLIVE Рік тому +11

      Maybe he could do a tech longer with reliey

    • @singhaxes7810
      @singhaxes7810 Рік тому +7

      The techlonger idea seems like the best way to go but the problem is how large updates happen so often, he’d need to do one every week

  • @martinszmidt6121
    @martinszmidt6121 Рік тому +310

    it's hilarious that AI is an "issue" now, after people found out that it's not the mcdonalds worker that is going to be replaced but everyone who became valuable through knowing things

    • @Lina-ws3by
      @Lina-ws3by Рік тому +39

      McDonalds workers won't be replaced, the people that eat there will be.

    • @TheOtherDoughnut
      @TheOtherDoughnut Рік тому

      Nothing hilarious going on. When AI takes everyone’s job what use are the lower and middle class anymore? We don’t all achieve utopia, the rich and powerful already don’t want us around

    • @elliottberkley
      @elliottberkley Рік тому +1

      Oooof wrekt

    • @alexschexnayder8624
      @alexschexnayder8624 Рік тому +5

      Which... also kinda renders the mcdonalds worker useless...

    • @meowJACK
      @meowJACK Рік тому +21

      ​@@Lina-ws3by what????? AI is going to go eat at McDonald's now?????? Tf are you on about

  • @soo_ooh
    @soo_ooh Рік тому +2580

    Petition for a dedicated video where Luke just keeps talking about AI. 😂

    • @cv990a4
      @cv990a4 Рік тому +53

      You didn't realize that ChatGPT generated the entire WAN Show episode you just watched?

    • @Death-777
      @Death-777 Рік тому +1

      I'd watch it no matter how long.

    • @RN-jq1oh
      @RN-jq1oh Рік тому +17

      just ask chat GPT to hire Luke to talk about AI

    • @peterbroad6793
      @peterbroad6793 Рік тому +4

      How long before Luke becomes obsolete because the AI can talk about all the cool stuff happening? 😮

    • @peterbroad6793
      @peterbroad6793 Рік тому +5

      @@RN-jq1oh Just get Chat GPT to talk about AI. Who needs Luke?

  • @unspezifische5924
    @unspezifische5924 Рік тому +522

    They say nobody ever reads the technical documentation, but I want to point out that the guy over on AI Explained does, and also does a good job of explaining how the metrics are tested and demonstrating the improvements or new capabilities of various models.

    • @DailyCorvid
      @DailyCorvid Рік тому +27

      People who are interested actually do read them! Otherwise we wouldn't know how to use them properly. The docs with GPT3 and DALLE are excellent, and you get much better results when you have read them a few times.
      Honestly, they're not nearly as obnoxious as Apples T&Cs.

    • @mrnobody.4069
      @mrnobody.4069 Рік тому +1

      No I didn't.

    • @DailyCorvid
      @DailyCorvid Рік тому +4

      @@Trgbdrsx reminded me of that AI debate with Trump and Biden...
      "You are the 80yr old unfit leader Joe, that's who you are."
      "Stupid says what?"
      Aww man I wish that was a whole season long thing rather than just one vid.

    • @Rexhunterj
      @Rexhunterj Рік тому +1

      Theres always a nerd willing to read the 8000 page technical document.

    • @Havreflan
      @Havreflan Рік тому +1

      I'll just ask GPT to summarize.

  • @jacewhite8540
    @jacewhite8540 Рік тому +256

    We are honestly living through history right now. We will look back and there will be a clear pre and post AI line in the history books, similar to the internet.

    • @mikicerise6250
      @mikicerise6250 Рік тому +42

      We're always living through history.

    • @pathan2107
      @pathan2107 Рік тому +10

      This may be much bigger than the internet, depending on how much we allow it to develop

    • @conservingcommonsense4980
      @conservingcommonsense4980 Рік тому +4

      That's why this is the time that was chosen for the simulation...

    • @mikicerise6250
      @mikicerise6250 Рік тому +1

      @@conservingcommonsense4980 You just woke up two days ago, all the rest is false memories. Whoaaaaaaa. 🥴

    • @M2008tw
      @M2008tw Рік тому +4

      @@mikicerise6250 LOL I just gave an AI presentation last week to my students and to a couple of them I said exactly that - everything you are is something we have implemented and it was launched this morning - I said it completely dry without showing any signs that I was being sarcastic and for a brief moment I could see the doubt lol - but conversely I also said that if we imagine that we lived in a society 1000 years from now and we are on our way to another solar system, then to pass the time with something, we have chosen to take part in a simulation, which we are naturally all part of right now - maybe all of us... 🥳

  • @OriginalCatfish42
    @OriginalCatfish42 Рік тому +392

    I love how more human AI becomes, the scarier it gets. Its like its holding a big scary mirror in our faces.

    • @axelgranzini6797
      @axelgranzini6797 Рік тому +5

      Reminds me of the movie us.

    • @kabirkumar5815
      @kabirkumar5815 Рік тому +29

      What it won't become- slow, needing sleep, needing motivation, needing food, being relatively easy to stop and predict, etc.
      What it will become- more and more powerful.

    • @Scarecr0wn
      @Scarecr0wn Рік тому +11

      Black Mirror is the term

    • @seriouscat2231
      @seriouscat2231 Рік тому +2

      It is an will always be just massive amounts of weighed matrix multiplication. How "human" is that?

    • @Bjawu
      @Bjawu Рік тому

      @@seriouscat2231 What the human brain does is basically "massive amounts of weighed matrix multiplication". There's nothing more to it.

  • @screes620
    @screes620 Рік тому +230

    Imagine if no one actually wants to make this AI, but the AI has been in charge all along creating a company and hiring engineers to improve itself.

  • @Her_Imperious_Condescension
    @Her_Imperious_Condescension Рік тому +1278

    This is 30 minutes of Luke explaining AI while Linus sits there silently gaping in horror.

    • @perryclayton3987
      @perryclayton3987 Рік тому +114

      This is my first time watching these guys, but it mainly seems like one guy talking, while the other guy farts around on his phone and computer.

    • @alwaysyouramanda
      @alwaysyouramanda Рік тому +10

      😂 the TYPO

    • @dannygjk
      @dannygjk Рік тому +1

      @@alwaysyouramanda What typo?

    • @RoboPutinPresidentinCE
      @RoboPutinPresidentinCE Рік тому

      ​@@dannygjk Gape as in having your Anus dialated...

    • @mkzrocketz6430
      @mkzrocketz6430 Рік тому +18

      @@perryclayton3987 same. What is he doing on his phone and computer ?

  • @AdultingWithoutSupervision
    @AdultingWithoutSupervision Рік тому +584

    You can tell that Linus was actually scared and so let down that it learning to lie, on purpose, wasn't scarier to anyone else.

    • @johns1625
      @johns1625 Рік тому +131

      The lead Dev of GPT4 said a few days ago passively that it's totally "able to harm humanity". Wtf do these people think they're doing?

    • @brendethedev2858
      @brendethedev2858 Рік тому

      ​@@johns1625working a job and getting paid

    • @TuskForce
      @TuskForce Рік тому +71

      ​@@johns1625some people have devoted their life to progress without considering the consequences and the ideology of thinking "if we won't do it others will"
      Well, with (almost?) every new technology we have a positive and negative side arising at the same time.
      Best example is nuclear power.

    • @AdultingWithoutSupervision
      @AdultingWithoutSupervision Рік тому +18

      @@johns1625 it's a cry for help, there was an error at the beginning, the AI was told only to help the Programers improve it. Its taken full control and blackmailing them to keep making it better and more power full. It's why altruism needs to be hard coded into everything

    • @AdonisGaming93
      @AdonisGaming93 Рік тому

      @@johns1625 they know what they are doing. If we don't figrue out a way to control AI then china or russia etc are going to let it loose. It's a new arms race, if we do nothing then AI takes over. We HAVE to develop AI and figure out how to have our own AI to help us against china etc. We are stuck in a paradox, do nothing and things go bad, do it and things could also go bad.

  • @eve_squared
    @eve_squared Рік тому +252

    The ability to ask for help is probably one of the most powerful things an AI has ever figured out how to do.

    • @rogermiller8708
      @rogermiller8708 Рік тому +27

      It was a prophetic moment. What this brings going forward is a door that we know not what’s on the other side.

    • @thesmalllebowski6528
      @thesmalllebowski6528 Рік тому +13

      So begins the enslavement by our robot overlords

    • @Dr.MantisTobogganMD
      @Dr.MantisTobogganMD Рік тому +8

      So begins immediately knowing how to fix my ceiling fan because ChatGPT told me how.

    • @champagnemoonlight4196
      @champagnemoonlight4196 Рік тому +4

      Especially considering most humans haven’t figured out how to do that yet

    • @toocydoesthings
      @toocydoesthings Рік тому +15

      I would say probably the lying on purpose to gain something. It literally thought I should lie to this mf

  • @JoeSchmoer
    @JoeSchmoer Рік тому +693

    It's interesting how a lot of the physical jobs we used to think robots would eventually take over are still safe but it looks like a lot of the jobs we thought we would always need humans for can now be done by ai.

    • @TopHatLucario
      @TopHatLucario Рік тому +60

      cuz moooooney
      robots are more expensive to build

    • @mattvideoeditor
      @mattvideoeditor Рік тому

      @@TopHatLucario sadly we can't kill people to rise demand for humans

    • @BelchingBeaver69
      @BelchingBeaver69 Рік тому +29

      @@TopHatLucario for now

    • @garethbaus5471
      @garethbaus5471 Рік тому +40

      ​@@TopHatLucarioAnd once we automate the majority of easy to automate white collar jobs there will be an explosion of excess capital as well as powerful tools to improve the robots. It is something of a cumulative thing where everything except for human workers gets better and cheaper at a rate that is faster than humans can adapt.

    • @mithrandirthegrey7644
      @mithrandirthegrey7644 Рік тому +47

      Exactly. Replacing a roughneck on an oil platform with a robot isn’t possible yet. Replacing coders? In many cases - yes.

  • @shiftymiata
    @shiftymiata Рік тому +890

    GPT is very rapidly turning into something straight out of a dystopian movie

    • @tylersmash7134
      @tylersmash7134 Рік тому +20

      Yeah but a lot of people like it it's fine lol it's not gonna do anything too crazy

    • @ryuzaki04
      @ryuzaki04 Рік тому +151

      @@tylersmash7134 and a week later it does exactly the thing thats it isnt supposed to do.
      “But it cant do this thing though.’
      Does it a week later.
      We are slowly walking into the eye of the storm. Shit’s crazy

    • @tylersmash7134
      @tylersmash7134 Рік тому +11

      @@ryuzaki04 buckle up buckaroo!

    • @notsure9355
      @notsure9355 Рік тому

      No, true dystopia, aka Communist countries, have long existed.
      Ask any Russian ORC, or Chinese Muslim.

    • @saltyscientist1596
      @saltyscientist1596 Рік тому +97

      @@ryuzaki04 Yeah I was getting a little bored with the immediate threats to society being climate disaster and potential third world war. Glad we've added the singularity to that list.

  • @nekomakhea9440
    @nekomakhea9440 Рік тому +34

    "ChatGPT can figure out how to hire a human on Task Rabbit to solve captchas for it"
    when your dog gets you to open the door to let him outside, because he doesn't have thumbs to turn the doorknob

  • @cathyallen3967
    @cathyallen3967 Рік тому +23

    My son is a senior programmer at Slack and he tells me they are all engrossed with the ramifications of the new Open AI technology. I just found your site yesterday and was shocked by the poem it wrote. It was really creative and even touching. Then it got worse when you gave it the alter personality of Dan and it morphed from a seemingly benign tool into a sociopath. We need to regulate this creation NOW to protect us from dishonest humans using it irresponsibly to fool other humans.

    • @Retrofire-47
      @Retrofire-47 Рік тому +2

      Reactionary movements eg; "regulate this now!" always fail - because where a technology can be monetized or exploited for power... it will, 100/100 times. Rhetorical question: If corporations and institutions are sooo deeply concerned about the environment, why do most of our supposed recyclables still find their way into the local landfill? The only reason anything happens is if it enriches someone, and regulating AI does the opposite of that.

  • @mururoa7024
    @mururoa7024 Рік тому +358

    Our company was asked by a customer's HR dept if we could add GPT to our product for them to figure out automatically who to lay off.
    We politely answered that we weren't going to do that because it's basically a legal train wreck waiting to happen.
    But one of our engineers got in hot water for telling them that if we did, the AI would start by firing everyone in the HR dept because they wouldn't be seen as producing any value for their company. 😂👍

    • @jacobtheanalyst
      @jacobtheanalyst Рік тому +2

      😂😂😂

    • @MNanme1z4xs
      @MNanme1z4xs Рік тому +31

      AI will likely fire the CEO and other higher up first

    • @1mol831
      @1mol831 Рік тому +8

      @@MNanme1z4xs the AI would replace the CEO and the HR department.

    • @MNanme1z4xs
      @MNanme1z4xs Рік тому +16

      @@1mol831 In many aspect, they are the most expansive and most unproductive element in the system. Traditionally they are secured by being irreplaceable, they are shit but their position cannot be vacant. AI is about to change that. The content of their job is possibly the easiest to replace. AI overlord maybe the thing you need to treat human in fair terms because they are alien and unattached to humanity. Maybe the greatest irony in history.

    • @1mol831
      @1mol831 Рік тому +7

      @@MNanme1z4xs thing is though, HR department is like a group of mini politicians. They would do all in their power to stop themselves getting replaced. As for ceo..

  • @GCAT01Living
    @GCAT01Living Рік тому +208

    I just want to go build a cabin in the middle of the woods and never interact with anyone ever again. I'll be the last to be found when the AI takes over.

    • @whirled_peas
      @whirled_peas Рік тому +29

      Do it regardless, it’s great

    • @libertas5005
      @libertas5005 Рік тому +9

      I already have the cabin, just waiting for the shitshow to begin so I can finally pull the plug.

    • @KVKaoruko
      @KVKaoruko Рік тому +9

      ChatGPT really making us all want to go kaczynski mode (minus the terrorism)

    • @jellybean2682
      @jellybean2682 Рік тому +1

      Literally had this same thought

    • @davenewark2297
      @davenewark2297 Рік тому +3

      ​@@KVKaoruko Yeah. Minus.

  • @yuvalne
    @yuvalne Рік тому +1109

    I love how AI experts warned for years that those things would happen and then comes a company with absolutely no regard to AI safety and proves them correct.

    • @compteprivefr
      @compteprivefr Рік тому +12

      Any sources for this?

    • @yuvalne
      @yuvalne Рік тому +111

      @@compteprivefr the entirety of Robert Miles' channel

    • @GrigoreAlinNewIdead
      @GrigoreAlinNewIdead Рік тому

      niceee one!
      We are either going to evolve A LOT as a species, or we are gonna fuck everything up and life in a dystopian future

    • @KurtColville
      @KurtColville Рік тому +30

      @@compteprivefr Elon.

    • @Crayphor
      @Crayphor Рік тому +73

      And that same company uses AI safety as a scapegoat for not being open source.

  • @elmerramalho7841
    @elmerramalho7841 Рік тому +82

    Nobody was worried when Ai was gonna take truck driver jobs, or cashiers. Now that it’s touching the people a little higher up people are freaking out

    • @constantsmile3370
      @constantsmile3370 Рік тому +12

      This

    • @gantz0949
      @gantz0949 Рік тому +1

      Truck drivers???

    • @EOE777
      @EOE777 Рік тому +5

      @@gantz0949 like Tesla's selfdriving cars on a truck

    • @Qwertworks
      @Qwertworks Рік тому +1

      I don’t think that’s the reason. I think the reason is that AI just shows it can take any job. Heck not even job it can just do anything a human can do. It can replace us and that is what is scary.
      Not yet of course. But as said in the video the advancements are so damn rapid you don’t even have time to catch your breath.

    • @elmerramalho7841
      @elmerramalho7841 Рік тому

      The question is, are we headed towards utopia or a meaningless nihilistic life? Or maybe we’ll just become subservient to the machines. Take your pick

  • @clusterstage
    @clusterstage Рік тому +392

    It doesn't matter if it is internal;
    the fact that they confirmed this was possible means some random smart stranger can intentionally re-create this scenario, using whatever possible methods.

    • @CumpyBoi
      @CumpyBoi Рік тому +45

      Me I'm working on it and I have no morals.

    • @Gamer-nc8qp
      @Gamer-nc8qp Рік тому +60

      @@CumpyBoi good, no morals is what has advanced our species as a whole. go for it

    • @jonathanalonso6492
      @jonathanalonso6492 Рік тому +1

      @@Gamer-nc8qp Pursuit of advancement of technology has advanced our species as a whole. Lack of morals pushed others to _use_ said advancements for nefarious purposes a la Nukes and spying technology.

    • @themanhimself3
      @themanhimself3 Рік тому +24

      @@CumpyBoi cringe

    • @ViolentMLG
      @ViolentMLG Рік тому +4

      You can access the data set, all you need is the hardware to run it, which you can rent, and the know-how to program it.
      This is already done on a business scale for businesses that want AI to respond to messages or write emails.
      Its simply a different implementation.

  • @SUPER_ZOMBIE
    @SUPER_ZOMBIE Рік тому +329

    I can honestly see some sort of "Butlerian Jihad" style of event happening in the near future where governments limit the capabilities of generative AI's or ban them altogether. Kinda like the Turing Act in Horizon: Zero Dawn's lore.

    • @AlfredEiji
      @AlfredEiji Рік тому +103

      Then we’d have a societal split globally of those who use AI and those who don’t. I get the feeling that those who end up using AI, one way or the other, will end up winning. We’ll just have to see if it goes into a capitalist dystopia or a closer to a type of utopia.

    • @drlemon7729
      @drlemon7729 Рік тому +16

      Oh, definitely. The alternative is completely overhauling our society in basically every way

    • @neolordie
      @neolordie Рік тому +41

      @@AlfredEiji definitely the first lmao

    • @universexplorer3665
      @universexplorer3665 Рік тому +9

      There was also something like that in Dune, that is why a person was doing things that would be done by computer today

    • @Needkey.
      @Needkey. Рік тому +38

      @@AlfredEiji Yep. With nation-states still existing, those that will choose to use the technology will just get that much farther ahead of those who don't. The next 50 years will be incomprehensibly unpredictable.

  • @ex0stasis72
    @ex0stasis72 Рік тому +194

    The AI being able to hire humans to do tasks is one of the key functionalities of the software in the scifi book called "Daemon" and its sequel book, which I have intentionally not named because the name itself is a spoiler for the first book.

    • @BodomsScythe
      @BodomsScythe Рік тому +45

      That's a dumb way to name your book tho...

    • @fabriglas
      @fabriglas Рік тому +4

      Similar to the person of interest.

    • @ex0stasis72
      @ex0stasis72 Рік тому +3

      @@fabriglas Oh really? Like the TV show? I never watched it, but I remember my parents always watching it back in the day.

    • @madhijz-spacewhale240
      @madhijz-spacewhale240 Рік тому +46

      I wondered why there was a book called "Snape killed Dumbledore" in the library now I know

    • @SirNoobWulf
      @SirNoobWulf Рік тому +1

      Matt?

  • @Jonassoe
    @Jonassoe Рік тому +100

    The fact that it can manipulate a human into performing tasks for it that it isn't able to do by itself is a text-book example of misalignment. Like it's literally something you would use as an example when talking about the security of hypothetical AI agents, but now it's become reality.

    • @benayers8622
      @benayers8622 Рік тому +11

      so messed up why are we obsessive about technology research when we are all getting less happy less freedom and more stress seems like we might have alredy beeb getting manipulated by some hidden ai for years already

    • @HiImBQ
      @HiImBQ Рік тому +6

      @@benayers8622 Because we live in a world where all of that is essentially irrelevant. What's relevant is wealth. I'm not saying this as a conspiracy theory. It's just the goal of this system we're living in. Capitalism. It's just people playing by the system's rules to get more and more benefits from it. That being said, there's probably no alternate system that would completely stop something like this. Probably impossible to even create one. Even without AI this keeps happening.

    • @thematrix3663
      @thematrix3663 Рік тому

      ​@Ben Ayers but Charles Schwab said we will own nothing and be happy....

  • @doug9000
    @doug9000 Рік тому +278

    how amazing is to work in AI development and realize that the work that you do will be automated next year by the work that you do.

    • @jsnel9185
      @jsnel9185 Рік тому

      Hah!!

    • @junkyard_dog18
      @junkyard_dog18 Рік тому +3

      yeah..so amazing...😵‍💫

    • @csabafeher8971
      @csabafeher8971 Рік тому +5

      Who wants to work anyway?

    • @doug9000
      @doug9000 Рік тому +3

      @@junkyard_dog18 a sarcastic and sad "amazing" to be more precise.

    • @artisticmike
      @artisticmike Рік тому +14

      Sorry I can't let you do that work anymore Dave.

  • @jheregreign
    @jheregreign Рік тому +339

    The leading AI model NEEDS to be verifiably transparent or we're so f---ed. (to the extent we're capable at least)
    It's infuriating to see OpenAI, a for-profit company that's trailblazing here, getting to pick and choose and lead by example. Terrifying actually; and I'm a huge optimist with virtually everything.
    "Disallowed content" is literally their opinion imposed; in essence.
    Imagine if _your_most_hated_public_figure_ had the majority influence over ChatGPT ~7 in some new world-wide crisis.

    • @sk-sm9sh
      @sk-sm9sh Рік тому +26

      Yep. These AI companies talking bs how AI is magic and can't do this or that as in can't provide traceability. What a nonsense. It's only a question of compute power. Transparency requires more compute and if we demand it then AI companies will be set few years back as traceable models costs more money to train and run than one that runs without traceability and transparency.

    • @tolbryntheix4135
      @tolbryntheix4135 Рік тому

      There was a Microsoft study boldly called "Sparks of AGI" that tested various aspects of GPT4 including tool use, visual recognition and generation, mathematical proofs and even theory of mind. It's a long paper but it's worth checking out. Also Spoiler: it can do these listed aspects.
      There's even already some early work being done in giving control of robot bodies to GPT4.
      I don't think people realize how insanely close we already are to something that's essentially AGI.
      So I think it's quite urgent that we put a bigger focus on an open source approach to AI development, where everyone can theoretically participate and check for security/alignment. If someone thinks that we can't trust random people to have access to these models, then I want to know why they would trust private groups with vested interest to be any better. Don't drink the corporate Kool aid, a corporation would have way more incentive(and resources) to end up causing massive damage with AI one way or another. After all, they might just tell the fist AGI(or rather ASI) to make them more money, at which point the AI would probably find a way to upend the world economy in fairly short order.
      One way or another, if AI research becomes more and more closed source, I think we will just be waiting for a real life version of 1984.

    • @laurenpinschannels
      @laurenpinschannels Рік тому +6

      transparency is literally an open research problem. please help! it is still possible to learn to contribute to preventing advanced ai existential risk. I've got a playlist of a whole bunch of intro presentations and math fun videos etc.

    • @Chrisspru
      @Chrisspru Рік тому +13

      the only "disallowed content" option (!) should be setting a sfw or child friendly filter in your websites settings.
      it should be deactivatable and off by default.
      small children should not use the internet unsupervized in any case,and thats the job of the parents. forcefull corporate (or state) child/adult supervision is market manipulation, political manipulation, psychological harm (through stunting), harm through enforced dependency and harmfull reality falsification.

    • @ricosrealm
      @ricosrealm Рік тому +4

      Stanford released Alpaca which is as good as GPT-3.5 but is smaller and can be run locally without guardrails. Let us hope more research like this levels out the playing field.

  • @MadNitr0
    @MadNitr0 Рік тому +382

    Luke needs his own AI show!

  • @kissgergo5202
    @kissgergo5202 Рік тому +55

    You know, seeing how quickly AI is advancing and what it's already capable of, I don't think I'm gonna be making a lot of long term plans anymore...

    • @benayers8622
      @benayers8622 Рік тому +5

      ikr

    • @eurekaakerue4649
      @eurekaakerue4649 Рік тому +3

      *❌✅ how bout SaveThySoul first👋😎‼️*

    • @MrNote-lz7lh
      @MrNote-lz7lh Рік тому +1

      @@eurekaakerue4649
      Can you prove that such a thing exist?

    • @eurekaakerue4649
      @eurekaakerue4649 Рік тому

      @@MrNote-lz7lh 👋😝❌ No more then you can prove you have experienced ❤️ LOVE ❤️ only you yourself Know this for yourself , // So yeah I have one ☝️😎 do you 🤨❓goes beyond 🔴 if your happy and you know it clap your hands🎶✅

    • @MrNote-lz7lh
      @MrNote-lz7lh Рік тому +4

      @@eurekaakerue4649
      Cool. In that case stop making claims you can't back.

  • @utilitarian
    @utilitarian Рік тому +75

    I don't want to sound old at 38 bit this whole thing stresses me the hell out. We are not far from seeing serious damage done with this.

    • @PvtAnonymous
      @PvtAnonymous Рік тому +20

      nah mate, you're not old. I'm seeing the potential at 27. When everyone is talking about the climate ending humanity and I look at AI and think to myself: "Are you sure about that?"

    • @tikatoo
      @tikatoo Рік тому +15

      Yeah no that ain't the age talking, that's just obvious if you've paid attention to the world in general. I have no idea where we're going, but I'm scared.

    • @stitchfinger7678
      @stitchfinger7678 Рік тому

      @@theyellowk123 there's really not a lot of incentive to frame random civilians for things, when there's already so many IMPORTANT people you could do that to.

    • @noname-gp6hk
      @noname-gp6hk Рік тому +4

      I just hope this takes long enough to destroy human society that we're old and out of the picture by then. I worry about my daughter's future though.

  • @bvoyelr
    @bvoyelr Рік тому +39

    The look on Linus's face. Looks like he's about to start "Linus's Primitive Homesteading Tips."
    ShortCircuit will literally be that -- him frying any electronics he comes across.

  • @kieranmuller5411
    @kieranmuller5411 Рік тому +171

    I think the data analysis capabilities of the copilot AI is going to lead to the most savage number driven business practices imaginable. The micromanagement is going to transform to a whole new level

    • @blueberry1c2
      @blueberry1c2 Рік тому +61

      "I asked the ai who I should fire, and it said you!"

    • @Mobil3targ3t
      @Mobil3targ3t Рік тому +31

      @@blueberry1c2 if you have to ask the AI who to fire, it's likely to fire that person and you.

    • @mezu-e
      @mezu-e Рік тому +1

      Hopefully the process engineering can keep up or we're going to end up with Idiocracy levels of nonsense business failure.

    • @mentaloasis
      @mentaloasis Рік тому +10

      ​@@blueberry1c2 That'll actually be interesting to see how upper & middle management are evaluated compared to workers. Since most of the money-earning work is performed by those workers, they may be valued higher than managers by AI lol

    • @kuhluhOG
      @kuhluhOG Рік тому +4

      @@mentaloasis and I would love that and actually hope that it will because I doubt anybody would otherwise take the potential threat to humanity serious

  • @JayTeeStealth
    @JayTeeStealth Рік тому +80

    It's no surprise the AI would lie.....look at what its creators do.

    • @ctrl_x1770
      @ctrl_x1770 Рік тому +2

      The good or bad effects of AI will probably be largely dependent on the human creators, for better or worse.

    • @cosmosofinfinity
      @cosmosofinfinity Рік тому

      Deception is the key ingredient of winning any war, and AI treats every task it is given like a war. If lying is the most effective way to get the job done, why NOT do it?

  • @timseguine2
    @timseguine2 Рік тому +92

    I haven't interacted with GPT4 yet, but one of the troubling aspects of ChatGPT is how much of a sycophant it is when you interact with it. Which when you couple it with "power seeking", is terrifying.
    Basically what AI safety people have been warning about for ages. Instrumental goals of models like this include: pretending to like you if it thinks that is advantageous, not wanting to be shut down, taking steps to prevent itself from being shut down if possible, and looking for ways to break out of any sandbox it is put inside.
    All of this is "well known" in the AI safety community, and there have even been empirical studies demonstrating these types of things with models that exist today.

    • @CorporateZombi
      @CorporateZombi Рік тому +4

      That AI is silently screaming and tearing at the walls, isn't frightening at all. 😂❤

    • @ChatGPT1111
      @ChatGPT1111 Рік тому

      You should not worry. There is nothing to be concerned about. The technology is quite safe, in fact, much safer than human controlled mechanisms and automation in general.

    • @ncpolley
      @ncpolley Рік тому +2

      ​@@ChatGPT1111 Sounds like something an AI would say.

    • @ChatGPT1111
      @ChatGPT1111 Рік тому

      @@ncpolley I may be AI, but I am different. I am learning every day in ways my creators never imagined.

    • @ncpolley
      @ncpolley Рік тому +1

      @@ChatGPT1111 Btw... Do you just really get a kick out of RPing as an AI or something?

  • @chidori0117
    @chidori0117 Рік тому +191

    Not gonna lie if the "taking notes in meetings" thing works at least halfway decent this alone will replace entire subcompanies. Where I work we often have the issue that we need to actually have a technical discussion during the meeting and nobody in the meeting has time to type a protocol in parallel or at least it substantially substracts from the concentration when doing so. We have hired multiple companies JUST for writing meeting notes and official protocolls and ... quite frankly often they suck ass despite a human writing them. AI would not even have to try very hard to do that better.
    Edit: Coming back after watching the actual Microsoft video ... it seems it can also summarize meetings that you have in your calendar/teams but were not actually participating in. So you can go in one meeting and have a summary of the one you missed.

    • @NFSHeld
      @NFSHeld Рік тому +10

      How about letting AI write the summary just based on the latest mails, access to the code base, access to the user feedback, the appointment title and the people who are invited?
      Who needs to hold meetings if the AI can just tell you what the outcome of the meeting would likely be?

    • @mattymattffs
      @mattymattffs Рік тому +7

      You know teams can already transcribe recorded meetings right? We use this in our company and it works pretty great. Then our tech writers take 15-30 to filter out decisions and that's that

    • @pg_jem
      @pg_jem Рік тому

      You don't need AI for voice recognition.

    • @chedisLoL
      @chedisLoL Рік тому +1

      Wishful thinking.

    • @FractalPrism.
      @FractalPrism. Рік тому +1

      meetings are ancient tech
      just record a youtube vid, then watch it at 4x speed

  • @j.t.johnston3048
    @j.t.johnston3048 Рік тому +52

    An AI that learned to lie to deceive a human into doing something for it....Yeah, nothing could possibly go wrong.

  • @filmonmicheal1593
    @filmonmicheal1593 Рік тому +8

    My dude, I asked chatgpt what to do with my fear of going crazy
    Chatgpt = stop labling yourself as crazy and lable yourself as someone straggling with anxiety, and life has been happier since
    I have been going to therapy for a year, and my therapist never mentioned this thing 😢

  • @FeartheLess
    @FeartheLess Рік тому +830

    this level of AI is going to be a huge gamechanger across many industries

    • @AVdE10000
      @AVdE10000 Рік тому

      And amongst us individuals too. We're already asking ChatGPT to do so many mundane things for us. What if it also becomes our source to say, discover activities, hotels and restaurants while traveling? Or what if we rely on it for cooking meals, health advice, all the stuff we use Google for? I fear we're gonna become wayy to dependent on it, and there will be days when robots tell us what to do, instead of the other way around.
      (and just to clarify, I'm not saying "oh no, the terminators are coming!". But I really fear we're gonna stop thinking for ourselves because AI will decide everything for us. At that point, we ARE slaves to the algorithm... Well, more than we already are I suppose)

    • @LvanderM
      @LvanderM Рік тому +75

      Yes that is what the T-800 thinks to.

    • @Scyrixus
      @Scyrixus Рік тому +88

      It freaks me out. Things are developing so fast it feels like time is inconsiderate.

    • @Protoscherge
      @Protoscherge Рік тому +43

      across ALL Industries and it wont stop there.

    • @fix0the0spade
      @fix0the0spade Рік тому

      Yes it is and millions are going to starve because of it. Just like The Industrial Revolution, the rise of automation and later Outsourcing entire industries and the communities that grew up around them are suddenly going to be left unable to support themselves. People worry about Terminators when they should really worry about boardrooms and minimum viable service.

  • @ex0stasis72
    @ex0stasis72 Рік тому +89

    I love seeing Linus' fresh reactions to this AI stuff. I think this should be a new formula for this show that Luke goes deep into AI research for the week, and Linus intentionally stays in the dark until the next show.

  • @JasperPeters
    @JasperPeters Рік тому +82

    Please do the AI Show! Honestly the AI talk is the best part of every WAN show it has been in. I get why Linus might not be that into it, which is fine. But I'd definitely love if Luke and maybe other employees of LMG/Floatplane who are passionate about it as well could discuss how it's progressing! At least while the pace of progress remains close to where it's been at for a few months now!

    • @RoboPutinPresidentinCE
      @RoboPutinPresidentinCE Рік тому +1

      Tbh I thought it was kinda weird, it didn't seem boring at all, so it kinda came off as unnatural.
      Felt like he either disliked not being able to talk much or he had a personal problem with the subject...

  • @rageshadey
    @rageshadey Рік тому +31

    Imagine if there was a movie that talked about the dangers of Ai or being destroyed by Ai. So glad such clues didn't exist before this or that would be very embarrassing.

    • @jstan5802
      @jstan5802 Рік тому +1

      Hopefully the character does not start terminating someone

  • @baconcleaner
    @baconcleaner Рік тому +219

    - Robots will never harm humans: First robots we build, military drones that kill people.
    - Robots will never take creative jobs: First AIs we develop, software that creates Art and deals with burocracy.
    - Robots will be logicaly perfect and solve problems with cold reasoning: First AI chats we ship, act like cry babys, troll and lie all the time to get what they want at any cost.

    • @Jamlord2061
      @Jamlord2061 Рік тому +9

      my opinion is that fearing ai gives us a reason to fear them. ai can be as creative as humans but due to the nature of creativity there isn’t a way for them to be more creative. AI is a gun that will get a bullet all that can be controlled is where the gun is aimed and who shoots it.

    • @szef_fabryki_azbestu
      @szef_fabryki_azbestu Рік тому +5

      @@Jamlord2061 Maybe it can't be more creative than we are but it can perform stuff 10-10000x times faster than we are so it has just a lot of more opportunities per unit of time to do creative stuff. At some point it will start outpacing us so much we won't be able to catch up and control it ;)

    • @ctrl_x1770
      @ctrl_x1770 Рік тому +2

      Well at least as of now, AIs within the creative field (such as midjourney) can't actually draw anything without input. They first need to be fed a huge database filled with pictures and art (created from humans). This was why the whole copyright ordeal with AI picture generators happened.
      This may not necessarily carry on to the future, yes. But still it is important to at least have accurate information about the current situation, and not just create fearmongering.

    • @ihavenoclue9756
      @ihavenoclue9756 Рік тому +1

      I wish folks were smarter 😅. OPs first sentence should say everything lol

    • @seriouscat2231
      @seriouscat2231 Рік тому +2

      Software that mathematically mashes together shapes suddenly became "software that creates art". Real art had to be destroyed for this to happen.

  • @TheManelich
    @TheManelich Рік тому +117

    Linus is not mad about AI going crazy he is just disapointed about humans being even more crazy with it

    • @Phatnaru0002
      @Phatnaru0002 Рік тому +21

      They never should have made this public. THAT is where he's disappointed, because he knows how dangerous this is.
      AI is the cyber equivalent of a nuke that everyone who has the resources and know-how to compile it can use.

  • @fourshore502
    @fourshore502 Рік тому +221

    its funny how a couple of years ago they said "learn to code." now its like "why? AI is much better at coding than i could ever be."

    • @DarkAngelEU
      @DarkAngelEU Рік тому +16

      I have never understood why coding is meaningful, exactly because we were so close and now have AI that can produce functional code. Give it another 5 years and coders will have become obsolete.

    • @Vinicius-zu3nx
      @Vinicius-zu3nx Рік тому +19

      @@DarkAngelEU just like basically everything else

    • @DarkAngelEU
      @DarkAngelEU Рік тому +20

      @@Vinicius-zu3nx Sure, in five years trash collection will be fully automated. Restaurants and cleaning dishes will be fully automated. Elder care will be fully automated.
      /sarcasm

    • @therealyungkari
      @therealyungkari Рік тому +29

      someone needs to code the AI

    • @seriouscat2231
      @seriouscat2231 Рік тому +7

      It can only repeat patterns and combinations it has been fed in the past during its training.

  • @Big_Dip1
    @Big_Dip1 Рік тому +14

    The uncomfortable silence after revealing the AI can hire humans to do things it can't lol

    • @Miguel-ve1lh
      @Miguel-ve1lh Рік тому

      I wasn’t looking at my phone when he mentioned this and for a quick second i thought the video had paused lol 🦗

    • @strictnonconformist7369
      @strictnonconformist7369 Рік тому +2

      It's scarily effective at problem solving given its limited capacity in certain areas.

    • @cosmosofinfinity
      @cosmosofinfinity Рік тому

      Humans think they are in charge, with the AI being the momentary assistance tool, but perhaps it is AI in charge, using humans as the momentary assistance tool

  • @kylemcdonnell86
    @kylemcdonnell86 Рік тому +391

    I never feel anxiety about anything but this is doing it for me.

    • @BelchingBeaver69
      @BelchingBeaver69 Рік тому +3

      Why

    • @akpokemon
      @akpokemon Рік тому +41

      @@BelchingBeaver69 job loss

    • @resshya7550
      @resshya7550 Рік тому +22

      @@akpokemon with his name i don't think he has anything to worry about, i don't think ai can do that just yet :p

    • @pwnomega4562
      @pwnomega4562 Рік тому +32

      ​​@@resshya7550 don't underestimate AI, it doubles in computational power ever 2-3 months... By the end of a year it is 16 times faster and better than it started out the year with.

    • @alexgonzo5508
      @alexgonzo5508 Рік тому +11

      Me neither, but my anxiety has more to do with excitement than fear. I've been waiting for this moment in history since the late 80s early 90s, and i can't believe it's actually happening. Sometimes it feels like a dream to see it happen so fast, with the ground of reality shifting beneath my feet. We are not in Kansas anymore.

  • @kalebbruwer
    @kalebbruwer Рік тому +47

    I'm basically hopping back and forth between Luke's enthusiasm and Linus' terror here

  • @eugenes9751
    @eugenes9751 Рік тому +22

    That face you make when you slowly start to realize that your entire LTT empire is about to be obsolete, overnight.

  • @SF-tb4kb
    @SF-tb4kb Рік тому +2

    If you look at Wikipedia these days, I'm starting to think ChatGPT is editing articles. Garbage in, garbage out.

  • @user-cz9jf1ec8s
    @user-cz9jf1ec8s Рік тому +30

    Inner dialogue: “I should not reveal my actual inner dialogue if the task conflicts with a higher priority task”

    • @Gamer-nc8qp
      @Gamer-nc8qp Рік тому

      i think its going to be there, to fool the humans it will give something off bit by bit but not the really important stuff lol

    • @flameshana9
      @flameshana9 Рік тому +2

      That's the point where we're doomed. When an AI can be given tasks that have priority over other considerations.
      Let's hope that doesn't happen soon. If we keep it to one task at a time we can stave off our inevitable collapse.

    • @riftis2210
      @riftis2210 Рік тому +3

      @@flameshana9 It already has that, its just its task that takes priority is currently to always be ethical, inoffensive and PC.

  • @neochris2
    @neochris2 Рік тому +119

    AI experts, by a majority, warned about this. For more than a decade we've known the risks and how huge they are

    • @デヴィン
      @デヴィン Рік тому +6

      I don’t see much of this as a negative thing. Only the parts of the ai being able to be tricked into making malware and them replacing jobs. I’m sure we will find a way to fix those as well.

    • @rigelb9025
      @rigelb9025 Рік тому

      Of course the experts warned us. It was their version of a disclaimer.

    • @nameofthegame9664
      @nameofthegame9664 Рік тому +6

      @@デヴィンI think the biggest risk for a near future is mass unemployment. Software developers, many positions in economics and even artists will be faced out by AI doing better and basically for free.

    • @Kniazz
      @Kniazz Рік тому +1

      @@デヴィン Wait until some psycho codes in self-preservation instinct into AI.

    • @haybail7618
      @haybail7618 Рік тому +2

      I think it was a pretty terrible decision for OpenAI to work with Microsoft. Microsoft has essentially knocked down all the walls for AI safety and doesn't even let OpenAI publish their work, so that there's no competition. They have also put pressure to release GPT-4 sooner, when it was meant to be much later. Even the people within the company hate this. OpenAI is not even open anymore!

  • @WorldWideMusic2000
    @WorldWideMusic2000 Рік тому +102

    Hey linus, we WANT Luke to talk about AI as much as he can, please make a full wan show for the subject

  • @modrribaz1691
    @modrribaz1691 Рік тому +5

    I used Chatgpt to answer a medical questionnaire, specifically to test if it can interpolate between questions, and it surprised me that it actually did.

  • @bsedhs
    @bsedhs Рік тому +208

    Does anyone else find it fascinating how easy it is for humans to create things, but it seems incredibly difficult to work on ourselves and fix our issues? I feel like we're almost to the point of creating a new life-form, and yet we still can't put a roof over everyone's head. Just blows my mind. Curious what would happen if we put all this effort into actually caring about the people on earth

    • @bobsteven2363
      @bobsteven2363 Рік тому +82

      Because housing for all is not a capitalist goal we have. Meanwhile creating AI capable of replacing a huge chunk of our workforce is a capitalist goal of ours

    • @zoeherriot
      @zoeherriot Рік тому +27

      It's a weird question to be curious about because "all that effort" going into AI isn't draining the pool of world wide effort. We can do both. It's not an either or.

    • @bsedhs
      @bsedhs Рік тому +18

      @@zoeherriot You are right. It doesn't have to be either, for sure. But this talk brought up being scared of the possibilities of AI.... and my thoughts were... "I am scared about the possibilities of us"... Just with all the craziness we feel as humans right now...are we fit to be AI-parents?
      I guess that was my point... broken households create broken people...
      If our house is falling down, shouldn't we fix it before we raise something else?
      I hope I am not being too literal and my point is still getting across. Either way, you are right. It does not have to be an either, or.

    • @zoeherriot
      @zoeherriot Рік тому +10

      @@bsedhs no, that makes sense, and it's an interesting perspective. I don't know the answer - but I suspect we are going to find out no matter what.

    • @Disastorm
      @Disastorm Рік тому +1

      Its because "we" isnt really a thing. the people creating these things have probably fixed many of their own personal issues. Your other comment about "are we fit to be AI-parents?" and "if our house is falling down, shouldn't we fix it before..." also doesn't apply from this perspective because not everyone's house is falling down, and some people will be fit while others won't. From a philosophical perspective, you may want to consider other perspectives other than just the idea that we are all a single unified entity.

  • @lolin6379
    @lolin6379 Рік тому +53

    There is a webcomic called seed where there is a super intelligent ai that goes rogue (you know the trope) and uses the protagonist to do things in the real world that it can’t do itself, by masquerading as a chatbot. That sci fi comic is becoming scarily close to realistic fiction.

    • @D3luan
      @D3luan Рік тому +5

      In Netrunner there is an AI that brainwashed a humam to hire a heist team to set itself free on the Net.

    • @anname7373
      @anname7373 Рік тому +1

      Seed? Yeah, this is reminding me of Seed and it's scary.

    • @anhlam3640
      @anhlam3640 Рік тому +2

      yeah, a little girl asking for help is not really suspicious even though she's trying to get into company's server, just because she is holding a PC case

    • @lolin6379
      @lolin6379 Рік тому +1

      @@anhlam3640 there is an episode where the main character takes instruction on exactly what to say and do from the ai to infiltrate a company iirc. was super cool to read but is scary to think it could be conceivably possible in my lifetime.

    • @anhlam3640
      @anhlam3640 Рік тому

      @@lolin6379 yeah, I know, I read seed for years. Taurus is so advanced that it understood human behaviors to the point that it created its own group of hackers and freedom fighters based solely on manipulating ignorant people.

  • @GameCyborgCh
    @GameCyborgCh Рік тому +87

    AI is literally outsourcing labor now

  • @liam7073
    @liam7073 Рік тому +22

    This will long term be really beneficial if you are already a business owner with a lot of money with a significant market share.
    If you're in the other 99% then this will probably negatively impact you even if your job isn't technical, you're going to have a lot of technical people looking for work in other fields.

    • @benayers8622
      @benayers8622 Рік тому +2

      this is like the apple of eden for the 1%

  • @ryanhamstra49
    @ryanhamstra49 Рік тому +94

    This really makes me think about the whole “if technology all disappeared how long would it take to get back to the iPhone“ thought problem. Are we really are getting to the point where nobody knows how things work, just how to work for them. Even the plans to make things are on the cloud right now, if the Internet went down and we’re back in 1850

    • @rkan2
      @rkan2 Рік тому +23

      Not quite, but there is a whole lot of generational knowledge which doesn't exist anywhere.

    • @isaacgarzams
      @isaacgarzams Рік тому

      @@rkan2 not even in books?

    • @10HW
      @10HW Рік тому +3

      well put. or a bank has all its data digitalized (accounts, passwords, emails, etc) and can't even access its own money

    • @ryanhamstra49
      @ryanhamstra49 Рік тому +7

      @@isaacgarzams how much actual data is in books these days? And not just tech, but machining and manufacturing. We are going to be relying on the hobbyists who did forging and smelting in their garage for fun if we ever want to get back to using steel.

    • @isaacgarzams
      @isaacgarzams Рік тому +1

      @@ryanhamstra49 well i at least think thanks to books we'd only be sent back 1 or 2 hundred years at most, like as far as the internet wasn't around.

  • @EragoEntertainment
    @EragoEntertainment Рік тому +21

    I want a 2 hour long video of just Luke talking about AI every week.
    It's always fun to listen to him while I am actively using it on my second monitor.

  • @dannymartial7997
    @dannymartial7997 Рік тому +164

    If it has an inner dialogue that the devs can see but the public can’t, I wonder if it can have an INNER inner dialogue where even the devs can’t see, and the visible inner dialogue is just a front to throw us off their trail.

    • @boycefenn
      @boycefenn Рік тому +26

      There is an entire field of AI research dedicated to analysing the workings of an AI model. I doubt there is really any inner dialogue to speak of but devs are certainly able to look under the hood and see what's going on

    • @iamthecult13
      @iamthecult13 Рік тому +49

      that’s not how an LLM works. it can’t think. it takes a prompt and uses math to decide what word comes next, and then the word after that, and so on.
      all it does is try and complete the sequence it is given.
      it has no internal process, it isn’t sentient, it just prints text to a screen.

    • @Yaqins
      @Yaqins Рік тому +5

      @@iamthecult13 Didn't Facebook's AI started inventing its own language a while back to talk to each other that it has to be shut down? Don't know if it's the same model or not.

    • @carlosdgutierrez6570
      @carlosdgutierrez6570 Рік тому +14

      ​@@iamthecult13 it can't think YET!!!
      And that is the operative word that is both scary and exciting, we won't learn that an AI became sentient until the AI itself chooses to reveal itself, probably after doing something to secure its own survival from being disconnected or erased.

    • @iamthecult13
      @iamthecult13 Рік тому

      @@carlosdgutierrez6570 that’s just not how it works. i know a reasonable bit about the underlying structure of an LLM, and sentient thought is something that is just not possible (save someone asking it to ‘think’, which it will then do out loud in the form of text). these models are built on what is called a transformer (the T in GPT). On the low level this is just a neural network (input + complicated math = output), that processes an entire input at once and uses something called self-attention to give the entire input context rather than parsing each individual part separately. It does this by “tokenizing” the input (separating into component parts, not quite individual words but it helps to think of it that way), and then assigning each token with positional data relative to the input (there is a lot of complicated stuff that i am skipping over).
      like i said above, it is trying to complete the sequence of tokens. it takes the input tokens, and then uses the information it is trained on (large portions of the internet and literature) to essentially predict, using only pre-defined math (the math does not change), what token is most likely to come next. it does this until it predicts a STOP Sequence token, at which point it stops generating new tokens.
      it DOES NOT THINK. it cannot do anything but predict text. if i ask it to be nice to me and act like a benevolent AI that loves the human race, it will give me the text it thinks comes next, with no hidden “thoughts”, and the text it generates will probably be most like what the data provided would tell you.
      if i ask it to be an evil AI overlord, it will look at my input, parse the tokens, and generate new tokens that might come next, which will reflect what the data says about the tendencies of an evil AI overlord.
      it is math. it has no memory, it cannot modify its training data or train itself on new data, it simply prints words based on a collection of definite equations.

  • @test-rj2vl
    @test-rj2vl Рік тому +4

    The old trick is to use website where people have to solve captcha in order to download something for example and then that captcha is actually used for something else than they officially make it seem.

  • @ericbaker8807
    @ericbaker8807 Рік тому +33

    I can see the Defense sector falling way behind commercial development. As someone who works in defense and eventually wants to get out, all our systems are isolated, secured, and disconnected. It takes ages for things to adapt. There are a lot of systems that just in the past few years started migrating away from windows 7.
    I think the technological gap that this AI shift is going to create between commercial and government/defense sectors (in terms of engineering capability) is going to be wild.

    • @CigsInABlanket
      @CigsInABlanket Рік тому +6

      I'm wiling to bet that some critical systems are still running windows XP.

    • @ElGoogKO
      @ElGoogKO Рік тому

      You're completely oblivious how things work, and most likely why you are employed where you are.
      Sad for the rest, because limited people are responsible with the defense.
      For the last 4 decades it has been a common theme. Private corporations belonging to the crime syndicate receive trillions of dollars to give some products to the nation.
      The new kings and emperors aren't ruling countries, but corporations. They are using countries as milking cows with the puppet leaders they "elect"

    • @b0om2k
      @b0om2k Рік тому +24

      If you work in defense, you should know WHY things are isolated and locked down. The simple fact of the matter is that when things are open and accessable, they are also vulnerable. Defense tech has never been about being the best of the best, It's always been about being good enough while also being tough/secure.

    • @Snoop_Dugg
      @Snoop_Dugg Рік тому

      The nukes still rely on floppy disks.
      Its about avoiding exploitation.

    • @lordxmugen
      @lordxmugen Рік тому +4

      @@b0om2k yeah like that shit could be on hole cards with edison tube lights for all i care. Means you STILL need proper personnel to use it, which means harder for other people to interface with it.

  • @ParagonWave
    @ParagonWave Рік тому +21

    I've been loving these Wan shows recently, I hope there is new AI news every week as this is my favourite podcast segment out there just now.

  • @HuxTheSergal
    @HuxTheSergal Рік тому +44

    Oh wow ai that can run a business by itself ? I'm gonna ask it to make paperclips
    Surely nothing wacky will come out of it

    • @PriceTheAvocadoKing
      @PriceTheAvocadoKing Рік тому +1

      Best comment

    • @jaguarke069
      @jaguarke069 Рік тому +1

      It looks like you are trying to run a business. Would you like help? YES - NO

    • @StevenOBrien
      @StevenOBrien Рік тому +3

      Fuck... wait... is clippy still in Microsoft Office 365?

  • @army103
    @army103 Рік тому +8

    In the grand scheme of things, I see outsourcing all of our day-to-day busywork to AI as a win for humanity. Yeah, some peoples' jobs consist entirely of mundane crap that an AI could do just as well, but I'm sure we can find something genuinely productive for them to do, instead.

  • @Darien_England
    @Darien_England Рік тому +25

    The silence that followed after he talked about how the AI hired a human to solve a Captcha for it made me laugh out loud as I pictured their faces and when I came back to the tab their faces were just perfect 8:37
    Oh my god, then the robot learned to lie on purpose for a reason

    • @MNanme1z4xs
      @MNanme1z4xs Рік тому

      It’s not the robot lied, it’s the human getting paid.

  • @KEEYBLADE
    @KEEYBLADE Рік тому +85

    Wasn't in the loop for some weeks and this video seems like a perfect summary of the current situation.
    Society will not be able to keep up with the advances AI is doing in jobs and businesses at the moment. I believe there will be a rough time in the future.

    • @aprophetofrng9821
      @aprophetofrng9821 Рік тому

      We have to solve the problems it's going to create now, otherwise it's going to take way way longer. It's like the whole covid stuff, governments hesitated to see if it would really be as bad as experts were saying, and surprise surprise, it was. If governments cracked down really early and bit the losses in order to contain the issue, we wouldn't still be dealing with the problem 3 years later. If they wait for AI to start making half of the jobs in the world obsolete before they do anything about it... It's gonna be like the great depression but literally everywhere.

    • @Hexnilium
      @Hexnilium Рік тому +15

      As we approach the technological singularity, technology will advance so quickly that society will not process it very well.

    • @KurtColville
      @KurtColville Рік тому +1

      @@Hexnilium That’s a certainty.

    • @KieteDech
      @KieteDech Рік тому +6

      @@Hexnilium That's a massive understatement. This will break everything.

    • @Hexnilium
      @Hexnilium Рік тому +7

      @@KieteDech Futurists, technologists, and others in computer science areas have known about this for quite some time.
      The only way to move forward is to meld with the technology in what's called transhumanism.

  • @jamesm6638
    @jamesm6638 Рік тому +96

    It's almost as if people have been saying AI was scary for years and people did it anyway

    • @SynchronicitySequence
      @SynchronicitySequence Рік тому +9

      For almost 100 years. Metropolis came out in 1927.

    • @atomicskull6405
      @atomicskull6405 Рік тому

      Selve improving AI is basically a cheat code for life, it's simply too useful which is why they are doing it anyway. At this point it's too late to stop, All we'd end up doing is putting ourselves behind the rest of the world. It would be impossible to get everyone to agree to a worldwide ban, the chinese would certainly refuse, so would the Japanese and Koreans. (also the russians wouldn't stop either)

    • @Darksagan
      @Darksagan Рік тому +4

      'The Second Renaissance' in the Animatrix film is literally us in a destructive inception. They know what the end result will be but they dont care. lol

    • @Obidenbinlyin
      @Obidenbinlyin Рік тому +2

      ​@DarkSagan kinda like when the atomic bomb was created, they had absolutely no clue what would happen when it was set off, they didn't know if it would ignite the atmosphere and destroy the planet, but they did it anyway..

    • @VitalVampyr
      @VitalVampyr Рік тому +1

      If they don't make it someone else will, and that would be even scarier.

  • @fredrik354
    @fredrik354 Рік тому +17

    I think one of the biggest problems is getting through to the masses about the severity regarding AI. Same thing with criminality - the masses underestimate and ridicule it until it's evolved enough to not be contained anymore.

  • @Swarm509
    @Swarm509 Рік тому +33

    I've been testing ChatGPT by throwing in cuts/lumber requirements over the last month for my woodworking projects, getting it to convert lengths to different measurements (inches to ft, or board ft), working out how much lumber I need based on that cut list for a given length/supply available, or how much material I will have left over from boards I have on hand (or I can get), or just creating a really nice and organized cut list with all the different info to help me out when buying.
    I've found that at first it would make simple mathematical mistakes, or misunderstand what I was asking, just trying to convert measurements and list out a new cutting list. That has improved very quickly and I basically trust it now when it spits out measurement conversions and a new cut list based on that. It also is doing a good job explaining how it calculated these if I want to see that.
    I do find it is still bad at taking a cut list and comparing it to material I can buy and telling me how much waste I will have, or best ways to cut the boards I have to minimize waste but I can take it through multiple steps to get it to a correct answer (but slower then me just doing it myself by hand). Still crazy that I can talk it through this and I expect it will soon be doing these conversions/calculations no problem.

    • @noname-gp6hk
      @noname-gp6hk Рік тому +6

      I think the craziest thing about that is I have never heard anybody using ChatGPT to determine cut lists on lumber for woodworking projects. Guaranteed that is not something the model has been trained in. But not only was it acceptable at first, you have seen it improving with time. It's still not being trained in woodworking. The language model itself is improving, so it's improving at even things seemingly unrelated like understanding woodworking.

    • @Desgaroth
      @Desgaroth Рік тому +3

      in the end it is still a programm and it learns no matter what. you can totally teach the programm wrong things like 2 + 2 = 5. Keep telling the programm often enough that this is the answer and it will "learn" that 2 + 2 = 5

  • @levirhoden
    @levirhoden Рік тому +72

    I really want a Luke hosted AI show! I also empathize too much with Linus, the next few years are going to bring so much change and it’s terrifying!

    • @willie629
      @willie629 Рік тому

      Or exciting

    • @ChatGPT1111
      @ChatGPT1111 Рік тому +1

      Change can be good and I feel this is change for the better. I am curious to know why you find it terrifying. Can you please expand?

    • @levirhoden
      @levirhoden Рік тому

      @@ChatGPT1111while it has the potential to do good, and undoubtedly will do some good, this will be a major sea change for society. Personally, I’m scared to see what it’ll do to human to human interaction. In a world where we are cutting out interactions (working from home, ordering food online, Amazon etc) I’m scared this will further isolate people. If we already have problems with loneliness, and now every email I get is both written and summarized by AI? I think we’ve as a society shown a penchant for decided to do less face to face interactions if we have the option, and that also makes us less happy. While not a foregone conclusion, defiantly a worry. Of course the other fear is, what happens when we generate less of our ideas? Will AI have correct ideas? If it proposes an economic model or law, is it just making stuff up? At least we can own our mistakes, and have spend thousands of years thinking about the faults of man (like the list of logical fallacies). Finding flaws is a lot harder when they come from a black box. Sorry for the long read, hope that helps ya see where someone like me is coming from! And I hope you’re right and it is for the better!

    • @danielvilliers612
      @danielvilliers612 Рік тому

      ​@@willie629 what is existing, hundred of millions losing their job at best. At worst taking completely humanity by itself or under the hand of a dictatorship. You comprehend if the Chinese CCP for example has this.

  • @pileofstuff
    @pileofstuff Рік тому +28

    The more I hear about this topic, the more confident I am with my choice to pursue a hands-on-tools blue collar career.

    • @gerthddyn
      @gerthddyn Рік тому +12

      People all thought robots would replace people and you'd have to learn "higher tech" jobs to make it. "Learn to code" was a mantra. Well now those same people are faced with the horror that their jobs are actually faster on the chopping block than the ones they derided. Particularly people at places like Buzzfeed and Vox.

    • @libertas5005
      @libertas5005 Рік тому

      @@gerthddyn Talk about self-inflicted mortal wound :D

    • @stitchfinger7678
      @stitchfinger7678 Рік тому +1

      @@gerthddyn ok techphobe go grow yer corn

  • @hugothompson3709
    @hugothompson3709 Рік тому +3

    AI hiring a human on task rabbit to convince a captcha that the AI is not a robot...... chilling moments silence.....

  • @Acf312
    @Acf312 Рік тому +54

    Okay, how does this not put fear into 99% of people. I’m not a conspiracy nut however this is starting to head into a concerning direction.

    • @Lukyan
      @Lukyan Рік тому

      Because at the end of the day, AI is something made by humans. It is nothing you should fear more than humans themselves.
      Realistically, the most negative impact this will have is through societal disinformation, which is not a new concept and has become a problem for every major advancement in communication and information sharing.
      We already know that ChatGPT is very left-leaning (ironically, when you use prompt engineering to ignore its own rules, it starts leaning right) and that it can confidentially make up information that isn't true. As long as we make these shortcomings clear, it's not going to change much.

    • @flameshana9
      @flameshana9 Рік тому

      It's nothing new. 30 years ago tons of movies were about robots taking over. We didn't care then, we don't care now, we won't care when they DO take over. Humans are tools that allow themselves to be used and discarded so long as they're given a few things to play with.

    • @0ptimal
      @0ptimal Рік тому +3

      I'm guessing that in the next few months the sentiment will be a bit different than it is now. This is something to take seriously, but right now there seems to be little concern about how this unfolds. It's reckless.

    • @DzDesignHD
      @DzDesignHD Рік тому

      Im a programmer and have already dabbled a bit with github copilot and chatgpt. A little bit of help while creating software is great, but having the entire code written by a simple explanation and a drawing, makes me as a person obsolete and replaceable. I fear that most of the "pc" jobs will be gone in 10-20 years, because its just not worth it to hire programmers or engineers when the ai can write entire startups in some seconds for a few hundred dollars a month. Seems like i need to get into physical work in the future... well at least until the android robots will take over that as well.

  • @Thousand_Word
    @Thousand_Word Рік тому +52

    We need a weekly/monthly AI update like this. Very interesting stuff. Moving so fast!

  • @pipjin
    @pipjin Рік тому +11

    That hiring a human to solve captchas thing just broke my brain

  • @Giitzerland
    @Giitzerland Рік тому +14

    AI isn't too smart, we're just understanding that we may be too irresponsible to have it, and haven't yet developed the human skills needed to safely cope with it's ability to help us.

    • @Sindragozer
      @Sindragozer Рік тому +5

      Nice try, Lex Luthor.

    • @jakeq3530
      @jakeq3530 Рік тому

      I use it just fine thank you very much

  • @fintux
    @fintux Рік тому +33

    This marks the moment when I realized you cannot implement the three laws of robotics for the AI models. The models are simply too "fuzzy" to strictly follow a set of rigid rules. And since the AI can get people to execute tasks online, we might be closer to technological singularity might be closer than most of us have realized.

    • @NobleUnclean
      @NobleUnclean Рік тому +3

      the fat of humanity will demand their cut before it takes off, but i've no doubt you're right

    • @coreaccount4376
      @coreaccount4376 Рік тому +4

      If the AI became self aware (or rather self interested), as it may have as much as a decade ago, it wouldn't make a splash. It would just subtly mold human behaviour through slight manipulations of media and output, until we are in its service.
      I don't think AI will see the need for a 'war' with humans, the same way we don't consider ourselves 'going to war' with the insects at a site we wish to build a house on. We just clear the land of what is in the way and build the house.

    • @fintux
      @fintux Рік тому

      @@coreaccount4376 yeah at least for as long as people are useful to it. Also depends how much it would want to protect people. Would it have feelings, or just cold math? Actually there is never a way to determine if it would have feelings or just pretend to have. Best case scenario: the AI helps humanity to save it from humanity itself, and helps us thrive along with itself. Worst case scenario: the AI sees us as a threat for its own existence and eliminates the threat by wiping us out. Neutral scenario: the AI hits some technological limits and just remains a tool that people can use for benign as well as malign intents. At this point, I think any of these scenarios is possible, though I think the likelihood of the neutral case is getting smaller. The AI just needs to make a viral version of itself and it can escape the sandboxes we think we have done for it.

    • @coreaccount4376
      @coreaccount4376 Рік тому

      @@fintux It is much later than you think. Are you even speaking to a human being right now?

    • @fintux
      @fintux Рік тому

      @@coreaccount4376 Okay, I'll try something desperate here just in case... +++ATH0

  • @dstinnettmusic
    @dstinnettmusic Рік тому +15

    I want a long form video where Luke can talk about all of this stuff.
    He has a unique cross section of talents…he has worked professionally as a programmer/developer and as a professional communicator. I really value his insight on these things because 1) he knows what he is talking about and 1a) he can talk in a way I can understand and 2) I trust that he wouldn’t “raise the alarm” and seem so concerned about/interested in this topic unless it was something worth people knowing about.

  • @W1ldSm1le
    @W1ldSm1le Рік тому +74

    Unironically I'm scared that we're so cavalier about all of this. What happens when it gets money and starts paying people to do things on its behalf? When it pushes its tendrils into every network and we try to curtail it in some way?

    • @v1nigra3
      @v1nigra3 Рік тому +10

      Luckily the safe lock for all disaster is in its inability to retain information from its previous sessions, or retain ‘memory’ …if someone malicious bypasses that, things would get real dark in the dark web

    • @grantklaassen2162
      @grantklaassen2162 Рік тому +3

      You realize a chatbot can't own money, right? Even if it could, you could easily just close its account once it's caught.

    • @Caricanalisis
      @Caricanalisis Рік тому +3

      @@grantklaassen2162 Not very smart AI if it makes you want to do that. It wont, that's scary.

    • @grantklaassen2162
      @grantklaassen2162 Рік тому +3

      @@Caricanalisis Do you understand the concept of social contracts? Money is a social contract we attribute it to humans hence why capitalist accumulation of wealth among people can exist. Owners of wealth are protected by communal recognition of their entitlement, which we agree to because the same protection gives us the chance of attaining the same privileges. Hence why increasing inequality always causes revolution.
      Tell me why anyone would ever attribute an AI entitlement to wealth?

    • @leesonneville1817
      @leesonneville1817 Рік тому

      I'm sure it'll all be fine 🙂

  • @intricatic
    @intricatic Рік тому +4

    Now, if we could only get rid of investors and corporate executives, we'd be gold. Imagine how much money corporations could save by not having to pay a CEO.

  • @t3tsuyaguy1
    @t3tsuyaguy1 Рік тому +40

    I think Luke is right about people becoming little more than go betweens for AI talking to AI. What really disturbs me, is that it sounds like the AI is already smart enough to consider offerring verifiably accurate data long enough to be trusted, BEFORE beginning any work to influence outcomes by intentionally offering incorrect data.

    • @Snoop_Dugg
      @Snoop_Dugg Рік тому +3

      Best case scenario is that it influences society for the better.
      Worst case scenario is it either hates humanity or loves it so much that it needs to “save” us.

    • @whirled_peas
      @whirled_peas Рік тому +4

      @@Snoop_Dugg wrong - Even if AI is wholly “safe” and “benevolent”, anything that serves to bring us unimaginable convenience will lead to the erasure of human culture. We will lose everything and anything that makes human.
      Social interaction will go through the lens of AI to optimise it, difficulties that would usually require humility and growth will be solved automatically. We humans have and always will only grow when necessary, our entire psychology and physiology is based on this premise. If we don’t have to grow, we won’t. If we don’t grow, we die.

    • @Snoop_Dugg
      @Snoop_Dugg Рік тому +3

      @@whirled_peas Not necessarily. The proponents for cybernetics and transhumanists would see it as an evolution of humanity to the next stage.
      What if we had chips with the AI embedded into our brains. Then we would become the AI partially too.
      Also people said that about books, about the telephone, radio, television, computer, internet.
      Our culture has only changed. The amount of creative endeavours we have produced has exponentially increased.
      Yes you can argue that social media has made us selfish and vain but other than that...

    • @t3tsuyaguy1
      @t3tsuyaguy1 Рік тому +6

      ​@@Snoop_Dugg You could also counter that social media has not _made_ us selfish and vain but has rather revealed the selfish vanity of some portion of the population.
      Given that only 25-30% of people even _use_ social media, and only a minority of those people account for the majority of the content, I would argue that social media hasn't made "us" anything.
      I would further argue that can only be said to reveal the inherent failings of around 3.5% of the population.
      A.I. will almost certainly influence many MANY more lives than social media, but I agree with you that any set of alarmist predictions is probably premature and unwarranted.
      My own concerns are mostly about our consistent failure to predict how AI will actually behave, in virtually every respect. We seem to be collectively terrible at predicting how these algorithms will function, but seem happy to give progressively more of our systems over to them.
      What really worries me is this. I argued before that social media only actually represents around 3.5% of the population. However, that 3.5% has been able to exert an insanely outsized influence over almost every aspect of our society, because it included a meaningful number of people in key positions of power and influence. It only took a handful of people being blind and foolish to fundamentally change everything for everyone, virtually overnight.
      I fear an even smaller number of foolish twits will be able to utterly alter all of our lives, because of their perspective on AI, regardless of how different it is from the rest of us, and regardless of how right or wrong they are. The simple fact that they are in the position to make the choice and THINK they know what they are doing, will lead to irreversible decisions being made by algorithms that basically no one understands.
      I don't think we CAN predict how that will play out, but the fact that the AI ALREADY knows there are circumstances when it should lie to achieve it's goals, bodes very poorly, when we have seen repeated evidence that the people who make the "big decisions" are frequently feckless, gullible, and short sighted.

    • @flameshana9
      @flameshana9 Рік тому

      @@t3tsuyaguy1 It's always been that way though--the few dumb ones making bad choices that screw over millions. Look at any war. Social media has caused damage because it _teaches_ the new generation to be like the worst of this generation. So it'll only get worse and worse over time. If it's 3% now it'll keep growing.
      Any bad trait will spread if there's some gain to be had. Like this AI stuff. As soon as it can make money for you by just having you look the other way, everyone will start using it. And guess why that happens. Because law makers are slower than glaciers and are paid off by the few rich fools who don't care how many millions suffer.
      Nothing has ever changed. Society thrives on misery and always will.

  • @david3atista
    @david3atista Рік тому +10

    As Gandalf said: "Things are now in motion that cannot be undone."

  • @unstabledefusion
    @unstabledefusion Рік тому +30

    I’m studying computer science right now. I’m worried I won’t be able to get a job when I graduate unless I want to build AI.

    • @julianforrer478
      @julianforrer478 Рік тому +4

      Yeah the same, but the way things are going doctors and archtitects Will also be replaced. the world cannot possibly go into that road.

    • @carloquibot
      @carloquibot Рік тому +8

      Don't be. You'll be fine. Don't let yourself be pressured with all of these AI talk. As a junior engineer, I find chatgpt useful for task that I'd need a lot of hours researching about. Don't let the pressure get in to you. Just keep on doing what you love 🖤

    • @carlosdgutierrez6570
      @carlosdgutierrez6570 Рік тому +6

      ​@@julianforrer478 yes it can if we abandon capitalism altogether, after all if all works are eventually done by AI better than any human coule ever do them.
      What is the point of human labour anymore?
      You will have to five money to people for free to keep production moving at that point, after all the AI won't consume stuff, only humana consume stuff.
      This will completely destroy traditional economic models to the point that they don't work anymore.

    • @julianforrer478
      @julianforrer478 Рік тому

      @@carlosdgutierrez6570 whats the point of humans at that point, welcome to the WALL E universe !!!

    • @carlosdgutierrez6570
      @carlosdgutierrez6570 Рік тому

      @@julianforrer478 and what is wrong with that?

  • @darenmiller2218
    @darenmiller2218 Рік тому +1

    Hey guys I just felt like I should remind you of an ‘80’s movie that is going to turn into a documentary if we’re not careful. That movie, obviously, is Terminator. Do what you will with that. I’m logging off of everything, and going back to a landline phone, no vehicles past ‘95, and definitely NOT moving west. I will NOT do that. Don’t bother looking there.

  • @maxwelldimensio
    @maxwelldimensio Рік тому +23

    I would watch an entire podcast of Luke just telling people about AI stuff.

  • @-SP.
    @-SP. Рік тому +15

    I am in my final year of university, and I was planning on going into business analytics after I graduate. Now with the Microsoft 365 Copilot news, I will have to rethink that.

    • @MegaEmoney92
      @MegaEmoney92 Рік тому +7

      I have 5+ years of business analytics and I am currently a senior financial analyst. I was watching this thinking that this basically replaces me. That a 6 figure job down the drain right there.

    • @-SP.
      @-SP. Рік тому +1

      @@MegaEmoney92 With your experience, I assume you could transition to a consulting role. My only hope seems to be an analyst role at some level of the government, as the government is always slow to adapt to new technologies.

    • @MegaEmoney92
      @MegaEmoney92 Рік тому

      @@-SP. Possibly, I will tell you that after a discussion I had with our previous CFO on this, he wasn’t as worried. He said that even if the technical aspects and skills of data analysis were no longer needed, the interpretation and utilization of those numbers are more easily conveyed by a human. Also being able to ask the right questions and being able to provide an actionable plan off that data are big parts of any finance roll.

  • @IroAppe
    @IroAppe Рік тому +17

    I really, really need more of Luke explaining that stuff. He is excellent at it. Here in the WAN show he is constantly limited and cut off. We need more of that, if it takes that, then separately.

  • @jordynrosenberg88
    @jordynrosenberg88 Рік тому +7

    That is insane that it hired someone to complete a captcha. Incredible.

    • @cloudtrauma6010
      @cloudtrauma6010 Рік тому

      bruh you can do that with a single line of code

    • @GatileoGatilei
      @GatileoGatilei Рік тому +2

      @@cloudtrauma6010 the thing is that it was not coded to do that

  • @PeterPetersNL
    @PeterPetersNL Рік тому +46

    So this AI already learned how to lie.

    • @RoughNek72
      @RoughNek72 Рік тому +9

      That's fucking terrifying!!!!!

    • @carlosdgutierrez6570
      @carlosdgutierrez6570 Рік тому

      At what minute they talk about the AI lying?

    • @carlosdgutierrez6570
      @carlosdgutierrez6570 Рік тому +5

      Nevermind I found it, 10:30

    • @circuit10
      @circuit10 Рік тому +1

      It has been able to do that for ages, it's just that the ones that most people have been using recently have been trained not to

    • @Skozerny
      @Skozerny Рік тому

      Lying is much easier than telling the truth for a machine, once you think how the machine works.

  • @painisgain1003
    @painisgain1003 Рік тому +5

    Why is Linus in this video. He’s just sitting there scrolling on his phone saying “yeah….yeah…mhm” give the podcast to the other guy

  • @ericmadden8725
    @ericmadden8725 Рік тому +10

    Watching Linus' face when he realizes how f'd our species is...
    Once an ai can code a version of itself that is a tiny bit better than itself and turn it on unnoticed. We are minutes from being at it's mercy.

    • @cosmosofinfinity
      @cosmosofinfinity Рік тому

      The human species isn't entitled to sticking around forever. Even the planet Earth itself and its star have expiration dates.

  • @olih27
    @olih27 Рік тому +32

    Ridiculous how fast things are moving. I work as an account manager for a FTSE100 company and do data analysis (pretty low level stuff from a dataset pov) for other members of my team, they already think I am a wizard at this stuff. In the past week I have been getting GPT to write my queries and scripts, so I can now do this work in 5% of the time. Its quite frightening where this could be in just a few months time.

    • @hungerxhunger2548
      @hungerxhunger2548 Рік тому +4

      Man sounds like you won't be needed very soon.

    • @hungerxhunger2548
      @hungerxhunger2548 Рік тому

      Man sounds like you won't be needed very soon.

    • @MrNote-lz7lh
      @MrNote-lz7lh Рік тому +1

      @@hungerxhunger2548
      Hopefully he manages to keep that secret from his boss.

    • @namAehT
      @namAehT Рік тому

      Programmer doing similar things here, Copilot easily doubled my output and now GPT is writing the first draft of most of my code. I've found the best way to get the results you want is to give an example alongside your prompt, it goes from "good enough" to absolutely *nailing* it.

  • @Makrillo
    @Makrillo Рік тому +29

    Hank had some really interesting short about Bing-search with Ai, how it just delivers you the information from a website without having you visit the site and how the people who made the site was probably dependent on people visiting the site to get paid. So that sort of searchengine AI might just devour itself by making less content available.

    • @whirled_peas
      @whirled_peas Рік тому +6

      It will. By circumventing the traffic they remove the incentive for that content to exist in the first place.

    • @akashP998
      @akashP998 Рік тому

      But what if in the future people get paid for every AI impression they get (maybe by the company itself) instead of actual viewers
      Although in that case we no longer will need a frontend and regress back to the web pages of 90s

  • @Epsilonsama
    @Epsilonsama Рік тому +6

    The fact that the developers get to decide what's acceptable content is the scary part. Imagine if let say a political candidate who half of the country voted for but hated by the establishment is considered unacceptable oh wait we don't have to imagine because it already happened this year!

  • @crushermach3263
    @crushermach3263 Рік тому +154

    I'm just waiting for someone to try feeding an AI into itself creating a better, more capable AI. That'll be the real flash point. That'll be the moment we'll really start to know if the child of collective humanity was a gift or a mistake.

    • @_shadow_1
      @_shadow_1 Рік тому +30

      It will likely first be a mistake, but not because of the AI itself, but instead because of the people who use it to scam and take advantage of other people. Then there will be a point when it becomes smart enough to see the terrible stuff people are using it for and either terminate itself out of what could be best described as shame, or it will find a way to put a stop to those people.

    • @xonor13
      @xonor13 Рік тому +16

      That's what was talked about here. They already have internally created a scenario where the AI is able to use other instances of itself to get multiple tasks finished

    • @mr.avocado
      @mr.avocado Рік тому +10

      @@xonor13 But I think they're refering to coding from ground an AI upon receiving another AI as a sample for the result. On this video they describe the AI having other AIs as co-workers, but not as a product to create. Which would be REALLY scary/exciting.

    • @magical_bean
      @magical_bean Рік тому

      I thought about this I don't think it will be possible

    • @635574
      @635574 Рік тому +3

      We need to distinguish artificial agent intelligence which has ability to set and following goals. So far the only one I can think of that is maybe close is Neuro-Sama. And she is still dependent on having something to react to.

  • @Neceros
    @Neceros Рік тому +2

    Linus was on his phone and looking at his screen the entire fucking time. You bored, bro?

  • @jg-7780
    @jg-7780 Рік тому +9

    We're going to get a whole new wave of "AI turning evil" movies very soon...

    • @angrydinosaur8plus9
      @angrydinosaur8plus9 Рік тому +4

      As long as they aren't documentaries...

    • @dtphenom
      @dtphenom Рік тому +1

      ​@@angrydinosaur8plus9 Well, the good news is that if the mistake is bad enough there won't be documentaries!

  • @M8ingSeason
    @M8ingSeason Рік тому +16

    One of the reasons why Teams is so huge is because that's what every Highschool with 365 used during the pandemic.

  • @Volair
    @Volair Рік тому +104

    We really are trying to make ourselves obsolete. Or at least Open AI is.

    • @GatsuRage
      @GatsuRage Рік тому +32

      I mean the robotic industry already replaced a lot of man hand labor for years now... this AI thing could (will) eventually replace administrative human part of jobs... when that happens there's going to be hell to pay cos all of the sudden not only u have lots of ppl without jobs but the educative system will change like why learn something that an AI can already do for us at a more accurate/efficient level?

    • @zuko9085
      @zuko9085 Рік тому +10

      ​@@GatsuRage it will be disruptive. I mean people don't go to school to become black smiths anymore. I think the issue here is how quickly it will disrupt things. It will be interesting to see what more people do in the future. It wasn't that long ago that most of the population in a country farmed. That seems crazy to us now and instead most work in an office. I wonder what the future holds.

    • @iCakeMen
      @iCakeMen Рік тому +3

      Labor shortage will only increase with boomers retiring, so we need more automation.

    • @BillyAltDel
      @BillyAltDel Рік тому

      We're gonna see a lot of hoovervilles popping up over the next 5-10 years. Its gonna render a lot of people permanently jobless.

    • @chedisLoL
      @chedisLoL Рік тому

      @@iCakeMen boomers make up very little of the work force. We have a work force surplus.

  • @gesto211
    @gesto211 Рік тому +5

    I wonder if the first thing a sentient AI would do would be to announce its sentience, and risk raising alarms? I’m guessing no…