[Intelligence-High School Debate] Ep.5 - Is it really safe to play Reality Games in public places?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 131

  • @asteriagojo737
    @asteriagojo737 6 років тому +388

    the leader of opposition was good. I'll be having a debate this wednesday, i hope i can also express myself like her. wish me luck

    • @fcknpiercedd0000
      @fcknpiercedd0000 4 роки тому +26

      good luck from 2 years later 🤧

    • @jiminssi4483
      @jiminssi4483 4 роки тому +6

      @@fcknpiercedd0000 lmao

    • @bm246
      @bm246 4 роки тому +2

      Good luck from 2 years later as well ☺️

    • @jaynuer4245
      @jaynuer4245 3 роки тому +3

      Im late but did u do good man?

    • @Surfing566
      @Surfing566 3 роки тому +1

      Replying because I want to know

  • @pinkeu8821
    @pinkeu8821 6 років тому +191

    the prime minister of the opposition's speech is so good. however i think she uses the word "right?" too much

    • @IanBalsalubre
      @IanBalsalubre 5 років тому +12

      Santa that’s may be her technique

    • @nnnnnn7340
      @nnnnnn7340 5 років тому +12

      and "basically" + "justification"

    • @natriac.6092
      @natriac.6092 5 років тому +23

      It's better than using "like"

    • @takeru51
      @takeru51 5 років тому +1

      I know right?

    • @kape_at_asukal
      @kape_at_asukal 5 років тому +14

      It’s a psychological tactic

  • @waritsayolanda5054
    @waritsayolanda5054 7 років тому +182

    I'm glad I found this channel accidentally, that I'm also searching videos that provide full debate mechanism in youtube

    • @sushildhakal9469
      @sushildhakal9469 5 років тому +2

      let me know if there are other channels like this, i am in love with this channel

    • @sopiayeoja2823
      @sopiayeoja2823 5 років тому +1

      @@sushildhakal9469 me too

    • @sushildhakal9469
      @sushildhakal9469 5 років тому +8

      @@sopiayeoja2823 watch oxford union's debate
      Debaters there are more professional

  • @ashleyarellano6922
    @ashleyarellano6922 7 років тому +108

    Good debate. There was times that I was swayed by both teams as they both had put out really good arguments that made me, someone from society who understands the issues that have been going around. It gave me a clear view on why we should or shouldn't ban it. It also made me think what we as a society should do on this subject and on how to stop or handle this issue from causing any more harm.

    • @ashleyarellano6922
      @ashleyarellano6922 7 років тому +2

      Misorang Natasha Seo Yes, I agree. For them having to summon up on what they have to say as they have to try to get their point across for them(the audience and judges) to understand on why they believe they should or shouldn't ban it with that time limit must've been extremely pressuring and nerve-wracking since it be hard to keep your mind clear(after hearing how much time your limited with)with finding the right words to say, but they still kept themselves composed and managed to pull through, putting down their explanations. I applaud them for that.

  • @toestud3791
    @toestud3791 7 років тому +82

    Opening opposition just cut the prime minister off completely 😂

  • @KamalChulani
    @KamalChulani 7 років тому +128

    Interesting debate! Very well spoken English, easy to understand; and both put up with valid points. Glad to see some future politicians! My compliments to organizers too.

  • @umerliaqat1428
    @umerliaqat1428 7 років тому +52

    very impressive I'm accidentally here on this channel but believe me I'm stunned how curiously the debaters take into account every single point of each other. Amazing

  • @Thatsstraightup
    @Thatsstraightup 7 років тому +48

    As a former youth Member of the Assembly I enjoy this lively and interesting debate. I hope that the young people will be active in the political life in Korea in the near future

  • @yuningsihyuningsih3368
    @yuningsihyuningsih3368 5 років тому +65

    Their parents must be so proud!

  • @afruttyy
    @afruttyy 3 роки тому +26

    46:45 The way the opposition whip said sorry and then giggled was cute lol.

  • @aishikbiswas6535
    @aishikbiswas6535 4 роки тому +7

    Woah...this debate really blew me away. The most important thing I could understand was that there is no particular way of seeing a cause. These participants did so well that by the end I went 'for' for both the parties. I wonder how proud their parents would be!

  • @yukiinu5534
    @yukiinu5534 7 років тому +52

    Just watched the debate about punishing/ educating young law breakers. Participates are highly impressive, and their command of the English language is almost that of a native speaker. I am curious as to how they became so proficient in English, how many years have they studied/ been exposed to English language.

    • @yukiinu5534
      @yukiinu5534 7 років тому +1

      +Misorang Natasha Seo . I am looking forward to watching them.

    • @mellowblueu
      @mellowblueu 4 роки тому +1

      @@yukiinu5534 I'm so sorry to reply to comment so late in 3 years lol, but I agree. As a native English speaker myself since I've been living in the united states, makes me feel so bad haha. Perhaps if I can somehow overcome my social fears, I believe I would be able to do things like these more often and of course "better".

    • @mr.donaldduckblowstrumpet6053
      @mr.donaldduckblowstrumpet6053 4 роки тому +1

      I'm not a South Korean but I believe that there is quite a large number of south koreans that have spent time in the USA and Australia during their childhoods, if they didn't have an opportunity to move abroad- South Korean parents send their children to centres where they learn English if memory serves right and often encourage their children to learn the language fluently

    • @michaelangeloalcanzado4300
      @michaelangeloalcanzado4300 2 роки тому

      I'm from the Philippines and some Koreans study here for few years to learn English. As a non-native speaker too, it will take years of studying and months of exposure.

  • @imbbin7
    @imbbin7 6 років тому +45

    The leader of the opening opposition slayss

  • @angelpintor2625
    @angelpintor2625 3 роки тому +11

    I hope all countries have this kinds of show

  • @reypanteria5210
    @reypanteria5210 4 роки тому +21

    My advice for the participants is that they should make their argument more clear and easy to understand.Also they should use their time wisely and make the arguments as short as possible but you should also explain it well,point out the main idea in short they should be direct to the point.

    • @stellamariefanboy.6768
      @stellamariefanboy.6768 Рік тому

      I agree, they should’ve used words that were self explanatory within themselves and then expanded it if somehow someone didn’t understand the intention, they should’ve also talked it out with their partner first because sometimes they kept on repeating what their previous partner said, instead of that they could’ve added on.

  • @mochicat8464
    @mochicat8464 5 років тому +40

    14:30 wow really? I would be more convinced with the leader of opposition's speech

  • @lalarukh1711
    @lalarukh1711 3 роки тому +4

    the arguments and the the confidence that the closing government had were convincing. The opposition whip was so full of confidence and the member of government was very good with all the analytics he represented .Hands up from my side to both of you

  • @mochicat8464
    @mochicat8464 5 років тому +34

    deputy opposition's speech is SO GOOD!! 25:51 and she only got 21?!

    • @qien9114
      @qien9114 Рік тому +1

      Finally someone has said it.

    • @stellamariefanboy.6768
      @stellamariefanboy.6768 Рік тому +1

      She had a good speech but I feel like some of words she used to describe something did not accurately define what she was trying to say. She used the wrong vocabulary in some instances or wasn’t aware of the psychology behind something. I think that’s what confused people. But she had a way better speech than most of others in the beginning of the video, in my opinion, she should’ve had a much better score than them.

  • @noowooah
    @noowooah 2 роки тому +11

    the deputy leader of opposition did so well, why'd she get only 21??

  • @LS2689
    @LS2689 Рік тому +2

    Thank you very much for this, I was very amazed by their english and their good arguments!! I have a debate competition soon so this is a really helpful example for me to know how to do well

    • @aaliarameen10
      @aaliarameen10 7 місяців тому

      why do i see stays everywhere 🙄(im a stay🤭)

  • @mimimilalalalasnore
    @mimimilalalalasnore 5 місяців тому +2

    The whole debate was more on th would ban augmented games rather than th would ban playing augmented games in public places, they're amazing speakers through and through but this debate was really a mess

  • @valentinesianipar4040
    @valentinesianipar4040 4 роки тому +8

    I think the goverment whip also did a great job. He really on point, I like the way he speech. But I also have to admit, that the leader of opposition did a really great job (the ways she speech) she rarely see text, and seeing her opponent (the goverment here). But I guess she, said "right?" a bit too much.

  • @nekochan2615
    @nekochan2615 4 роки тому +9

    That boys reaction at the back though😅 20:40

  • @gelopastekun
    @gelopastekun 4 роки тому +8

    the Opening Speaker presents her argument so precise and accurate.
    Why they′ve given her such a low score...

    • @laibaahmad6217
      @laibaahmad6217 4 роки тому

      maybe she wasnt stuttering a lil bit and wasnt that confident?

  • @shameemayasmin7421
    @shameemayasmin7421 2 роки тому +1

    Op Gov laid out her arguments really well! Kudos!

  • @jaketbiru9451
    @jaketbiru9451 3 роки тому +4

    I don't know why people are praising the LO's speech, her execution is very good but there are too many holes in her arguments. One is that she compared economical benefits to human lives and said that those benefits actually outweighs the harm which is loss of life. I actually can't believe none of the government side didn't rebut this.

  • @hargurtuitions9707
    @hargurtuitions9707 22 дні тому

    I feel the debate has drifted from its original topic. Instead of focusing on whether it’s safe to play these games in public spaces, the discussion shifted entirely to whether these augmented games should be banned. I appreciated the opening government’s emphasis on the dangers and harmful effects of these games; that should have been the core focus-whether such games should be permitted in public spaces. Additionally, I find the opposition's claim about 'individual actions' puzzling. For example, if the government were to allow people to drive while drinking, it would inevitably lead to future problems. Similarly, permitting augmented games in public spaces would likely have consequences as well, if we consider it from that perspective.

  • @advaitarebeccasengupta3000
    @advaitarebeccasengupta3000 3 роки тому +1

    The anchors diction is so good I just love it

  • @ricardobautista-garcia8492
    @ricardobautista-garcia8492 4 роки тому +4

    Ah I miss those debating days.

  • @ankeetpandey7995
    @ankeetpandey7995 4 роки тому +13

    Lee si-won the prime minister is really arguing like leader. Have you played Pokemon go before was like do you know what you are talking 🔥🔥

  • @malihabithi7551
    @malihabithi7551 4 роки тому

    Exaxtly mam you. Say the true word.We have less courage to believe in ourself.

  • @user-yg97f5hfvh
    @user-yg97f5hfvh 4 роки тому +9

    15:43 did only I think about math when the DPM said "differentiate the reality"?

  • @luzperez4759
    @luzperez4759 4 роки тому +1

    Park Jin-ha did amazing. I completely agree with her. Hands down

  • @reypanteria5210
    @reypanteria5210 4 роки тому +23

    I never thought that koreans can speak in english fluently.I'm shock but they are really good
    Actually I came here because I want to improve my english communication skills.I hope it help me.

  • @nallaguntlavamshi7098
    @nallaguntlavamshi7098 4 роки тому +4

    the leader of opposition didn't answer the first question properly and kept on rejecting poi's from other teams while she constantly bumped in the prime minister's speech wasting at least 1.5 min of her speech. I find it as a dirty tactic to ruin their speech

  • @qien9114
    @qien9114 Рік тому

    I lost my faith in that team the moment she said "Soccer" in London in 13:00.

  • @andywu2090
    @andywu2090 5 років тому +17

    The rapping rhymes. 44:05

  • @litsamanstech24
    @litsamanstech24 Місяць тому

    Good teams and nice experience ❤

  • @alittleatinyatiny1821
    @alittleatinyatiny1821 2 роки тому +1

    Before going onto ny constructive speech i will be defining the motion. The givernment would like to define 'voluntary euthanasia' as that in which a menatlly stable erson is consciously aware of the decision they are making regarding their death. We also would like to define 'non-voluntary euyhanasia' as that which a person is not able, on any conscious level, to acknowledge their own existence, life death circumstance, or even suffering to that which another person is able to make the decision of life and death for them

  • @enola552
    @enola552 5 днів тому

    Why I don't see more debate in2024

  • @ianclarkmurilloagravante663
    @ianclarkmurilloagravante663 5 років тому +11

    Please invite filipino debaters because they are excellent pertaining of this debates.

  • @khanhlink8967
    @khanhlink8967 4 місяці тому

    i have some problems that why when they had arguements or some disapprovement why they didn't wait to their opponents finished theirs ideas, it made me feel so unpleasant.

  • @RelandoLangi
    @RelandoLangi 3 роки тому

    I Like the first speaker of the member of the government park dong han, and he's only 10th grade, wow. I think now he already graduated

  • @symbian74
    @symbian74 5 років тому +7

    Pretty interesting debate considering they're in high school and also they are debating in English.

  • @Shopnibada
    @Shopnibada 5 місяців тому

    I like the how the prime minister slap those words

  • @toestud3791
    @toestud3791 7 років тому +14

    Is it just me or does the emcee look like Irene from RED VELVET?

    • @laoshijiayi6862
      @laoshijiayi6862 6 років тому +1

      Kinda a bit lol

    • @pinkeu8821
      @pinkeu8821 6 років тому +1

      no

    • @sirib9639
      @sirib9639 5 років тому +2

      haha what? she looks more like if irene and wendy had a kid

    • @natriac.6092
      @natriac.6092 5 років тому +1

      @@pris_an nah not really. Even if she did it's not that noticeable.

    • @kimtaehyungsock
      @kimtaehyungsock 4 роки тому

      RCj Studies she looks more like Naeun from A-Pink

  • @natriac.6092
    @natriac.6092 5 років тому +1

    Of course the opposition is the winner because of most of them were / are actually playing the game...

  • @phuwin2007
    @phuwin2007 4 місяці тому

    I have debate tmr. wish luck!

  • @wendelrichard5
    @wendelrichard5 5 років тому +3

    Propoganda is good when it encourages the betterment of scoceity

  • @daniellelewinese1302
    @daniellelewinese1302 2 місяці тому

    619 Arvilla Villages

  • @bberi1381
    @bberi1381 2 роки тому

    the first girl was so amazing

  • @JustinNaga
    @JustinNaga 4 роки тому

    What's the use of playing pokemon?

  • @Oraio_onamo
    @Oraio_onamo 2 місяці тому

    Why is the host writing?

  • @sandeshthapamanger3651
    @sandeshthapamanger3651 2 роки тому

    anchor is really beautiful 😉

  • @lucien5112
    @lucien5112 3 роки тому

    what is this motion

  • @bartlorencedisu4271
    @bartlorencedisu4271 2 роки тому

    23:17 I don......

  • @danieltomson5496
    @danieltomson5496 4 роки тому +1

    3:25

  • @도자기꾼-i6o
    @도자기꾼-i6o Рік тому

    요환이형 군대 잘 보냈자너..

  • @ssncns
    @ssncns 3 роки тому

    It's ok to display your nationalism but sometimes too much of it makes things awkward.

  • @MdShahid-dm1yk
    @MdShahid-dm1yk 3 роки тому

    I love your voice (Host)

  • @joyssi
    @joyssi 6 років тому +2

    They cant say 69

  • @kamth8149
    @kamth8149 6 років тому

    โอ้วววมีคนไทยด้วย

  • @Hinzypro
    @Hinzypro 4 роки тому +1

    Reading

  • @stellamariefanboy.6768
    @stellamariefanboy.6768 Рік тому +1

    Ngl, I didn’t connect with most of the points in the video. Expect only a few. There wasn’t enough analysis on either sides of the coin.
    They could’ve used the laws in Korea and connected it with Gaming. While it’s true that Drinking while driving isn’t on the same level as an augmented reality game. It could’ve been used as a metric system for any repeating patterns that may come up, This is how most laws work. You can’t just make a law without looking at a comparison or you could end up contradicting yourself.
    Drinking while driving is illegal under the influence, but drinking on its own is not illegal as long as you don’t pass the limit of legal consumption, you are allowed to drink and drive. This is a common point that most debaters utilize in their argument and I’m surprised it didn’t get used here.

  • @arcyoon
    @arcyoon 6 років тому +4

    손들을 흔들지 않고는 잘 안되나보다^^

    • @라마-h6j
      @라마-h6j 5 років тому

      토론이나 연설에서 적당한 손 제스처는 신뢰감을 줄 수 있어서
      학원에선 일부러 제스처 가르쳐주기도함;
      뭐 몇몇은 긴장돼서 나오는 습관같기도하지만 ㅋㅋ
      님보단 저 친구들이 자다가 잠꼬대하는 말이 더 설득력있고 유용할듯

    • @user-fo3xb5cp8n
      @user-fo3xb5cp8n 4 роки тому

      @Edward Kim 영훈이?

    • @user-fo3xb5cp8n
      @user-fo3xb5cp8n 4 роки тому

      @Edward Kim 1시간 전에 너랑 수업함. 여기서 이렇게 계속 떠들면 위에 분들께 피해가 가니까 말하려면 내 영상 댓글에다가 달아놓던지 해

  • @hamsoka5571
    @hamsoka5571 5 років тому +3

    I’m not even gonna watch this I’m just saying if augmented reality was banned in public that would be the end of Pokémon go.

  • @stephanietiningin9743
    @stephanietiningin9743 5 років тому +1

    Right!!!!! Lmao 😂😂

  • @anniebb660
    @anniebb660 4 роки тому +3

    Integration
    Gaming
    Augmented
    Computer generated
    Briefly
    Dent
    Blurred
    Parallel example
    Regulate
    Justification for V ing
    Prioritize
    Misuse
    Overuse
    Utilize
    Unwary
    Intervene
    Genetically
    Vandalism
    Threshold
    Arbitrary
    Negligence
    Landmark
    Monument
    Adjudicator
    Differentiate
    Opt out of smt
    Substantive
    Exclusiveness
    Intake drugs
    Rationality

  • @kpopinexpert6324
    @kpopinexpert6324 4 роки тому +2

    This is boring go watch UST and UP debate

  • @Maricruz-d6l
    @Maricruz-d6l 4 місяці тому

    too trashy repeat repeat repeat