CONFIRMING THAT REALITY IS OBJECTIVELY REAL
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 сер 2024
- Source:
www.podbean.co...
Is reality truly real, or is it a construct of our minds? We introduce the fifth Realtor, who challenges our perception of the external world, and delve into the philosophical debate between empiricism and anti-realism, drawing insights from George Berkeley and (surprisingly) Stephen Hawking. We then begin to explore the formulation of a genuine biblical worldview. Can the Bible offer a meaningful explanation of life, the universe and everything?
hope this video goes viral 🤙🏼🤙🏼😎
Thank you for this kind encouragement. Please "like" and share these readings with others because that is how more viewers become engaged.
You fundamentally cannot. No matter what words come forth in the next 21 minutes, this will remain the case. I'll hear it out nonetheless
What did you think after 21 mins
One more episode yet to be published on this subject
The only way to argue against the reality of reality is to deny all available evidence in favor of a theory with no real evidence. It’s a belief that people take up because it soothes some other conflict in their worldview.
Is it real?
No?
Then is it really not real?
Yes?
Then it is really not real. The reality is something. Reality is synonymous with whatever is, and therefore, this is objectively all read.
Real, I mean. Also read. lol
@@Oxxyjoe this comment is literal nonsense that has nothing to do with the nature of reality. At best, this is semantics.
you know its real by inference
From the get go, if the brain houses the mind, what have you to say about the rest of the nervous system? To assume that there is no relevance is much like saying that roots are separate from a tree…
This was covered when I first introduced and explained the Analogy in the video titled "THE MIND-BRAIN CONNECTION, EXPLORING HUMAN CONSCIOUSNESS" published a month ago and which you will find by scrolling back through the episodes having a mountain background. Please watch that and then come back to me with any further questions.
Mandela Effect. There are many different claimed examples. I have a few. Some people have many.
The main one for me is current realitys representation of JFK day in Dallas. Nov 22, 1963. I wasn't there. I wasn't even born until a few years later.
Until about 12 years ago the car was a four door limo with four passengers. The driver was the only secret service agent in the car. Governor Connally was in the passenger seat. His wife was not there.
Reality shifted to a stretch limo with 6 passengers. Few seem to recall this anymore, but there are still vestiges like 4 door Lincolns in museums representing the scene on that day.
I notice personal reality shifts of my own. They're irrelevant here, but they occasionally occur. Reality is in flux. That's just how it is.
you are saying that Jackie wasn't in the car before 12 years ago?
@@smolderingtitan No. The back seat has always been the same.
@@gmw3083 Can you prove what you're saying?
@@gmw3083 Did you watch Oliver Stone's movie JFK? The Zapruder film that was featured showed 6 people in the car. That movie came out 33 years ago. It showed 6 people in the car.
@smolderingtitan Look into the Mandela effect. Everything adjusts to the new paradigm. JFK, the movie and zapruder, used to have the 4 seater. Don't bother arguing about it with me. There are only vestiges remaining now of the 4 seater. Less all the time. The 6 seater reality has won out. For now. Reality is in flux.