Why Was This Woman Killed Over A Worthless Painting? | Monk
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 лют 2024
- A desperate man's elaborate plan goes horribly wrong.
Season 4, Episode 8 "Mr. Monk And Little Monk": Monk encounters an old crush from junior high when she hires him to discover why her housekeeper was killed and her favourite painting vandalised.
Monk is streaming now on Peacock: pck.tv/3JuixBg
Subscribe: ua-cam.com/users/MonkTVOffic...
Monk Synopsis: Adrian Monk (Emmy®-winner Tony Shalhoub) was once a rising star with the San Francisco Police Department, legendary for using unconventional means to solve the department's most baffling cases. But after the tragic and still-unsolved murder of his wife, Trudy, the devastated Monk becomes obsessive-compulsive. His psychological disorder has caused him to develop an abnormal fear of virtually everything: germs, heights, crowds... even milk. Monk's condition costs him his job, but he's back as a police consultant despite the unique challenges he encounters in his everyday life. These challenges lead Monk to hire a personal nurse, Sharona Fleming (Bitty Schram), who is always there to offer her assistance, even with the simplest of tasks (like organizing his sock drawer). Her less-than-subtle prodding keeps the "defective detective" on track in his investigations, as well as in his efforts to convince Captain Stottlemeyer (Ted Levine) to allow him to return to the force.
#Monk #AdrianMonk #TonyShalhoub
The Official Channel devoted to the brilliance of DI Adrian Monk; the defective San Franciscan detective, whose OCD is both a blessing and a curse. We'll be posting the very best moments from the show so, like Monk, you'll never miss a beat.
Monk on:
► Google Play: www.justwatch.com/uk/tv-serie...
► iTunes: apple.co/3ttDPpt
About Peacock: The streaming service from NBCUniversal that’s as free as a bird. Current hits. Timeless classics. Timely updates. Stream Now With Peacock, stream current hits, hundreds of movies, thousands of episodes of TV shows, and exclusive Originals - plus timely news, live sports, WWE, and daily pop culture. Peacock’s got all your faves, including Parks & Rec, Yellowstone, Modern Family, and every episode of The Office.
Get More Peacock:
► Follow Peacock on TikTok: / peacocktv
► Follow Peacock on Instagram: / peacocktv
► Like Peacock on Facebook: / peacocktv
► Follow Peacock on Twitter: / peacocktv
Get More Monk:
► Like Monk on Facebook: / monk
► Follow Monk on Twitter: / monk_usa - Розваги
"She did NOT, in fact, know how to use that gun."
Certainly not when to use it.
Or how to hold it
Women got nerfed so can’t use guns nor defend themselves ☕️
Even stupid can kill you at this point. What science-fantasy are we living in???
She talked about him all the time...
And you're led to believe the divorce was his fault.
9:06 "Let's assume you're right detectives. Once the criminals get here call my lawyer, I have nothing to confess at this moment".
One of few episodes i felt so bad for monk. When he has a chance to find new love, it always backfires for him. Kinda wish he ended up with someone who accepted all his flaws
Like natalie
@@ExileCrodie Natalie loved him, but not romantically.
It was for the best. He needed a friend more than someone else who might break his heart.
every time i see this in a movie/TV its always the same. Home owner thinks just having a people is enough. Either use it, hold it on the person while calling the police, or hide and call the police and keep it as a last resort. Waving it around proves you have no idea.
A weapon you're not trained and willing to use is a weapon that will be used against you. :|
It was great getting to see how Monk got some of his habits in this episode, but I still feel bad that Monk didn’t get to be with Sherry.😢
Trudy was a better women for him than sherry
I don't know much about stuff like this but technically it was an accident and was caused by other people. He only hired them to break into the house and deface the painting. I don't know how much time he will get for that though.
Accessory to manslaughter?
That's what the jury is for.
@@413dollazit’s not manslaughter. It’s murder. When you go into someone’s house without permission and your actions cause their death, that’s murder. Only if she’d invited them in and their actions cause their death then that’s manslaughter.
@@lemonadelemon1960 yes but Mr. Norfleet hired the two men tho, he didn't commit murder and Gladys the housekeeper was dead during the struggle but the men didn't mean to kill her so I believe that was manslaughter with breaking and entering for Mr. Norfleet
Oh, then you haven't watched ENOUGH TV--the "accident" falls into the category of felony murder, and, umm--well I'm sure all three are STILL doing time.
With that fancy lawyer from the other episode, he won’t have to go to jail 😂
I'm sure that he still will, being that those two burglars are gonna talk. Along with the crime scene displaying that the burglars knew the floor plan
I love the mark on the floor at 04:27 letting the actress know where to stand...or is it Adrian Monk's OCD marking exactly where everyone should be placed? 😆
Great episode of Monk
The painting is behind glass. It wasn't damaged. It didn't need restorer.
Considering it needed a restorer, clearly it wasn't. You also see clear as day that it's not behind glass.
She was stupid. She was holding a gun yet didn't know how to use it.
Dialing 911 from upstairs would have saved her life.
Spoiler Alert: it was ALL about the zeroes...
7:26 not all FOUR zeros were crossed on the check at 7:31. The date 9/10/05 was "normal" 😎
There is a slash next to it though, not including the slash separating day and month, I think he just missed that zero when crossing it.
The 0s in the dollar amount.
What makes this one unfortunate is that no one wanted anyone to die. It was a plan that just went wrong. Honestly, the plan wasn't even that evil. Sure, the guy did it for selfish reasons, but if went well he would have made his ex wife happy again by setting her up with her past crush.
I may not be a lawyer, but I don't think you can implicate him in the actual murder. The two thugs likely would collaborate that the break-in was his doing as it was planned. Problem is the murder was by all intense and purposes an accident NOT part of the plan. The break-in lead to the murder, but not part of the plan so this likely would just be a second degree murder which is murder without premeditation. The husband, I forget his name, had no direct influence over the actions leading to her death just the fraud.
I would think that he would be charged for masterminding the break-in, but the death is all on the two thugs. Two separate charges.
Depends on the state but actually it would probably be manslaughter because they didn't attack her she just fell. Also hate to be a grammar guy but it's corroborate not collaborate.😅
Doesn’t matter if it was an accident. If someone dies during the commission of a crime EVERYONE involved in the crime is charged.
It’s called felony murder. If someone dies while you are committing a crime, you are responsible for that crime. For instance, if you are a getaway driver for a bank robbery, waiting outside for the guys in the bank, and someone inside accidentally kills the security guard, you as the getaway driver are still as guilty of murder as the guy who shot the security guard. The same applies here. He committed a felony by hiring the guys to break into his ex-wife’s house. When the housekeeper died, under the rules of felony murder he is as responsible for the death of the housekeeper as the robbers.
@@marthaajacksonThat’s crazy and hardly fair or just! A get away driver is not responsible for the murder committed by another!
Every country and State differs on such charges!
Except no murder was committed. The guy might be found guilty of Conspiracy to Commit Breaking and Entering, which I doubt even gets punished. The guys that broke in could be found guilty for Vandalism, Destruction of Private Property, Breaking and Entering, and maybe Manslaughter.
Felony murder, if someone dies due to you commiting an felony act you are the hook for murder even if you were just the get away driver.
@@terran046 I didn't think about that. I stand corrected.
Death caused during the commission of a crime is felony murder
Fake concern. Returns to the scene. (As soon as they hear.) Struts around like a Shakespearian actor and declares himself guilty in all ways but words.
he hired someone to spray a painting and THEY pushed her where she knocked her head. how did HE get arrested for MURDER?
in the US, if a group is commiting a crime, any other crimes that any individual makes during can be charged to the whole group entirely.
@ShadowDemon_4 That's what the jury is for.
If you're not going you use a gun in this situation don't buy one. Guns are not for threats. Like a fire extinguisher you don't just hold one during a fire...
He said "they."
What s story
How is that murder?
Felony Murder: If, in the course of a dangerous crime being committed, a death occurs and only occurred due to that crime being committed, it can be charged as first-degree murder. While his main crimes fall under conspiracy, they still fall under the felony umbrella. Even if he didn't intend to harm someone, breaking and entering still can fall under the heading of a "dangerous crime". I hope that answers your question.
@@FirstLast-cg2nk Thanks! That answers it. Not sure he would be charged with that but a possibility I guess.
She died during the commission of a felony.
@@mikekeenanphdHe would not be. Monk takes place in California, and in California this would not be felony murder: the husband didn't do the actual killing, didn't act with intent to kill, didn't act with reckless disregard to human life, and Gladys, presumably, was not an on-duty police officer. In California, one of those things has to be true in order to trigger felony murder.
@@Vadered99 Even though the two guys who broke in did act with reckless disregard to human life? They just left her there and even spray-painted after killing her. And the ex tried to hide his involvement.
A guy doesn't go through all these hoops for an ex wife who divorced him. He'd simply leave a voicemail. Remember that Jimmy guy? He restores paintings at so and so museum. I mailed you the check.
No crime involved.
He’s gonna get jail time for hiring the robbers but not for murder. He didn’t do it.
Misdemeanor trespass and vandalism.
I'm no lawyer but I think he could be charged in connection for it somehow. He masterminded the crime to burglarize and vandalize his ex's house. The fact it led to a 3rd degree murder, I would think, is still on him too. But then this is California where Monk takes place and laws there are screwy.
@@Boskov01 Intent is the essential element of a crime. The intent was to trespass and vandalize the painting. The intent of the ex-husband 'mastermind' was to get his ex-wife to marry the other man. The burglars are individually responsible for the housekeeper's death, even then, it was unintentional.
Felony murder rule. If a death is caused during the commission of a felony crime, regardless of the intent, it's first degree murder. Breaking and entering aka burglary of a residential structure is a felony, and the ex hired the people to commit the burglary. Thus the ex is on the hook as part of the conspiracy.
@@robertperry4439
True if the burglars were half intelligent they could have tried to tell her the whole plan which is not even really malicious. If ask me the judge might not even send him to jail, just give him a large fine.
As much as I love Mr. Monk well let me just say this... I also love old crime TV shows. Matlock that good ole family TV show. The more I watched it the more I realized that Mr. Monk TV series got their ideas from Matlock. For example Matlock lived alone a widower wore the same suit and only bought the same suit which yes one of épisodes he shops for his suit.... it was like déjà-vu. So many épisodes are so cloned. Today I'm watching Matlock season 6 episode 10 and how does it start ? Game show ... I hope it's not another one that Mr. Monk copied.
Anyways I know I know everyone copies someone but when it's your favorite show that you watched 4 times (and probably would watch it again) well when you feel it's cloned it kind of leaves a sower taste in your mouth. It doesn't feel the same and the excitement it's gone.
This is a style of show. It's like murder she wrote as well.
i really liked watching monc at the time, but the evidence and everything seems so fake now, he figured they are bykers cause of the gloves, i know people who wear such gloves without being bykers, the dude writhing zeroes like that, would the bank even acknowldge checks with such zeroes, all the fiesta to get re-meried etc but well its still a nice show and you tv shows are not realisitc cause reality is not ment to be exithing in that way
It was a accidental kill he is not gonna go for a long time unlike the bikers
ever notice, how it is the husband who is always portrayed as the villain?
A female always plays the victim . The housekeeper death. Is on her choice to rob her x and on the broken system that allows it.. remember she chose to stay for the money. Always talking about how she could do better. . Her death is on the wife's greedy and broken justice system. That allows it
There's the episode where Monk's a Private Investigator. The wife tells the guy she's cheating with that she's choosing her husband, and then...
Most recent statistics show that in those cases where the gender of the murderer is known, over 87% are male.
The woman dies because of that stupid alimony. The judge that decided he should pay her money should go to jail for murder.
I sense a misogynist.
Supposedly they were divorced in Seattle. Washington state doesn’t grant alimony, hasn’t for fifty years. You get up to three years maintenance then you’re on your own. Child support is really high but no alimony.😊
@@richardbeckenbaugh1805 Maybe they had a prenup?
@@leannecanty8821 how is that misogyny? Alimonies aren't exclusive to women.
Women lie through their tongues
I wonder how many people would dare to cheat on their partners if cheating became a crime with a sentence of between 35 and 45 years in prison!
Probably close to the same, no cheater expects to get caught. Harsh sentencing is not as much of a deterrent as people like to think, especially for ones that are emotionally motivated.
So why did she buy that gun?? Lmao don’t feel bad for her
I think it was already there.
I used to enjoy this show until Monk got too annoying and his antics too long. I stopped watching it.
Wouldn't happen if alimony wasnt a thing
Pretty much.
I'm pretty sure a woman wrote this episode. The premise would only make sense to a woman. The husband had no reason to waste that money setting all that up. He could've just introduced them. The reason he didn't, according to the show, was just a throw away nonsensical reason.
You are wrong, written by Joe Toplyn and touched up by head writer Andy Breckman. It's pretty bad that you'd assume as such and it makes you come off as sexist. Silly writing is unfortunately a unisex issue.
It is still nonsense, he could have just gone to the house himself asked to be invited in, threw a fake tantrum and defaced the painting in front of her. That would have been a better solution to the convoluted plot idea but he didn't want to be the bad guy in the plot.
What frustrated me the most about this episode is how obvious the antagonist is. Didn't take more than 3 seconds to figure out him as the primary cause of the mess, I was hoping it was a red herring, but it wasn't. No the writing and the actors delivery (which is actually realistic if a person is a bad lair) just fall short.
I will give it credit though, this is the episode in which the villian succeeds in a plot that actually causes a happy aftermath to some degree.
You realize that was explained in Monk's recap, right? He couldn't just reintroduce her to him because she would have resented him for it.
Man, Monk's old flame is pretty fine.