St. Hilary of Poitiers | The Orthodox Filioque (and a response to

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 10

  • @OrthodoxChristianTheology
    @OrthodoxChristianTheology День тому +2

    The fact Ybarra and Dwong repeat the lime we reject "through the Son" when Blachernae shows they simply don't read nor have any idea what they are talking about. That or they are liars. I prefer the former.

  • @TheuncreatedLogos
    @TheuncreatedLogos 2 години тому

    Can I contact you on Discord or other platforms?

  • @JesusPerez-wd3tq
    @JesusPerez-wd3tq 8 днів тому

    Thank you for making these videos brother 🙏

  • @Jerônimo_de_Estridão
    @Jerônimo_de_Estridão 10 днів тому +1

    11:20 Athanasius says the same to refute the Arians, the Son is generate from the nature, but creation is from the will of God. He contemplate a distinction in will (which is an energy) and essence. But Aquinas affirm in the Summa that they are identical, making Athanasius argument against the Arians null and void.

    • @TheCathodox
      @TheCathodox  10 днів тому +1

      @@Jerônimo_de_Estridão nah bro, it's only a virtual distinction! [Joking]

    • @778FraxK
      @778FraxK 18 годин тому

      Good point

  • @pj_ytmt-123
    @pj_ytmt-123 7 днів тому

    _Per Filium_ is a good formulation!

    • @TheCathodox
      @TheCathodox  7 днів тому +3

      @pj_ytmt-123 I totally agree! And it is the only formula given in the ecumenical councils of the first millennium that goes beyond the Nicene Creed.

    • @JesusPerez-wd3tq
      @JesusPerez-wd3tq 6 днів тому

      ​@@TheCathodoxwill you respond to his video on the greek fathers?

    • @TheCathodox
      @TheCathodox  6 днів тому +1

      @JesusPerez-wd3tq not in one video but I will respond to the quotes and arguments he uses for each individual saint but I want to also highlight how the saints are compatible with orthodoxy rather than just making rebuttals so it's a bit of both