An Ex-Muslim Here: I don't follow any religion. But I found the Hinduism and the Bhagavad Gita is totally not based on any religion. It's not a religion by the western definition, it's a philosophy book and way of life practiced for thousands of years and the beauty is, it still exists. The Himalaya, is the cradle of civilization. 🙏♥️😊
The best translation and explanation of the Bhagwad Gita hands down. Plus, unlike most translators and explainers, Sant Dnyaneshwar himself reached enlightenment. I think the most decent English translation of Dnyaneshwari would be the one by Ghaisas.
The truth is... It's not about how to read Geeta. It's rather about who is reading Geeta. The thought of trying to understand Geeta within a single lifespan itself is Human Ignorance. If you're not at that spiritual level of existence in your current lifetime to understand Geeta in its depth, how would you be able to decode it's teachings? Understand this, and stay humble. It's harsh but true, no matter how much you try, it might still not be your cup of tea.
Rama and Krishna are not human! You don't understand. Krishna takes birth to display his pastimes to teach us the methods how to attain him. Shiva incarnated as Advaita acharya prayed to Krishna to come as Caitanya Mahaprabhu to teach people how to worship him in Kali-Yuga. If God displays humanlike qualities it is only to teach us proper behavior and etiquette.
There is only one Bhagavad Gita not many, it's in Sanskrit language. Learn Sanskrit or read many translations by many authors. The guest forgot to mention.
But how can I buy that original bhagwad gita written in Sanskrit that u are telling because there are many books in internet in the name of original bhagwad gita, please tell🙏
@@aryanpadamwar5768 You can get any of 1. Swamy Sivananda's 2. ISKCON version by Prabhupada 3. Maybe from Gita press Gorakhpur. They have original sanskrit script with word for word translation, some with transliteration, and the meaning in their own words in English. Have a look before you buy.
Now I understand these words meanings very well First part is GYAN which is shree Vishnu or lord Narayan Second part is action which is shree Ram Third part is bhakti which is shree Krishna Now I understand it better Thank you for podcast 🤠🤠🤠
Geeta in 45 minutes - if Geeta happened in 45 minutes or 2700 seconds then Shri Krishn would have had less than 4 seconds for each of the 700 Shloks. No my friend Geeta was not revealed in 45 minutes.
Actually he has added a bit. However, read the English translation of a book called Dnyaneshwari. The translation has been done by a man called Ghaisas. Dnyaneshwari came out of the mouth of a great saint called Dnyaneshwar, which was written down by a disciple of his. It is the best explanation for the Bhagwad Gita. Sant Dnyaneshwar was himself a completely realized being. Do some research on him and his 3 siblings, all of whom attained enlightenment. Their story, plus the book is extremely fascinating and enlightening.
When Arjuna asked Krishna to share the teachings of the Bhagavad Gita again, Krishna initially resisted, mentioning that the first time was under unique circumstances. Nonetheless, Krishna agreed and offered the Anugita. Although still wise, the Anugita didn't have the same powerful effect as the original.
गीता ज्ञान दाता वास्तव में काल अर्थात ब्रह्म है अध्याय 11 श्लोक 32 में पवित्र गीता जी को बोलने वाला प्रभु कह रहा है कि ‘हे अर्जुन यह मेरा वास्तविक काल रूप है'। गीता अध्याय 7 श्लोक 13 में गीता ज्ञान दाता कहता है कि इन गुणोंके कार्यरूप सात्विक श्री विष्णु जी के प्रभाव से, राजस श्री ब्रह्मा जी के प्रभाव से और तामस श्री शिवजी के प्रभाव से तीनों प्रकारके भावोंसे यह सारा संसार - प्राणिसमुदाय मुझ काल के ही जाल में मोहित हो रहा है अर्थात् फंसा है इसलिए पूर्ण अविनाशीको नहीं जानता। गीता अध्याय 7 श्लोक 12 से 15 का भावार्थ है कि जो साधक स्वभाव वश तीनों गुणों रजगुण ब्रह्मा जी, सतगुण विष्णु जी, तमगुण शिव जी तक की साधना से मिलने वाले लाभ पर ही आश्रित रहकर इन्हीं तीनों प्रभुओं की भक्ति से जिन का ज्ञान हरा जा चुका है वे राक्षस स्वभाव को धारण किए हुए मनुष्यों में नीच, शास्त्र विधि विरुद्ध भक्ति रूपी दुष्कर्म करने वाले मूर्ख मुझ ब्रह्म को भी नहीं भजते गीता ज्ञान दाता ने स्वयम को नाशवान बताया है गीता ज्ञान दाता ने गीता अध्याय 2 श्लोक 12, अध्याय 4 श्लोक 5, अध्याय 10 श्लोक 2 में अपने आप को नाशवान यानि जन्म-मरण के चक्र में सदा रहने वाला बताया है। कहा है कि हे अर्जुन! तेरे और मेरे बहुत जन्म हो चुके हैं। तू नहीं जानता, मैं जानता हूँ। अपने जन्म को गीता ज्ञान दाता ने गीता अध्याय 4 श्लोक 9 में आलोकिक बताया है जो कि सत्य है लेकिन उसने ये स्पष्ट कर दिया कि वो जन्म मरण में है। गीता ज्ञान दाता ने अविनाशी परमात्मा किसी और को कहा है जो कि वास्तव में परमात्मा है अध्याय 15, श्लोक 16 में गीता ज्ञान दाता ने कहा है कि इस संसारमें दो प्रकार के भगवान हैं नाशवान और अविनाशी परंतु गीता अध्याय 15 श्लोक 17 में गीता ज्ञान दाता ने कहा है कि वास्तव में अविनाशी परमात्मा तो इन दोनों (क्षर पुरूष तथा अक्षर पुरूष) से दूसरा ही है। वही तीनों लोकों में प्रवेश करके सर्व का धारण पोषण करता है। वही वास्तव में परमात्मा कहा जाता है। गीता अध्याय 8 श्लोक 20 से 22 में गीता ज्ञान दाता ने किसी अन्य पूर्ण परमात्मा के विषय में ज्ञान कहा है जो वास्तव में अविनाशी परमात्मा है। गीता ज्ञान दाता ने स्वयम को परम अक्षर पुरुष से उत्पन्न बताया है गीता अध्याय 3 श्लोक 14 से 15 में स्पष्ट है कि ब्रह्म काल की उत्पति परम अक्षर पुरूष से हुई है। वही परम अक्षर ब्रह्म ही यज्ञों में पूज्य है। (ये ब्रह्म काल ही गीता ज्ञान दाता है) गीता ज्ञान दाता ने किसी और पूर्ण परमात्मा को अपना इष्ट देव बताया है गीता अध्याय 18 के श्लोक 62 में गीता ज्ञान दाता ने अर्जुन को किसी और पूर्ण परमात्मा कि शरण में जाने को कहा है। गीता अध्याय 18 के श्लोक 66 में भी गीता ज्ञान दाता ने अर्जुन को अपने से अन्य परम अक्षर ब्रह्म की शरण में जाने को कहा है। गीता जी के अध्याय 18 के श्लोक 64 तथा अध्याय 15 के श्लोक 4 में स्वयं गीता ज्ञान दाता कह रहा है कि हे अर्जुन! मेरा उपास्य देव (इष्ट) भी वही परमात्मा (पूर्ण ब्रह्म) ही है तथा मैं भी उसी की शरण हूँ तथा वही सनातन स्थान (सतलोक) ही मेरा परम धाम है। ऐसा काल ब्रह्म ने इसलिए कहा है क्योंकि ब्रह्म भी वहीं (सतलोक) से निष्कासित है। वास्तविक भक्ति विधि के लिए गीता ज्ञान दाता (ब्रह्म) किसी तत्वदर्शी संत की खोज करने को कहता है गीता अध्याय 4 श्लोक 34 में गीता ज्ञान दाता किसी तत्वदर्शी संत की खोज करने को कहता है। इस से सिद्ध होता है कि गीता ज्ञान दाता (ब्रह्म) द्वारा बताई गई भक्ति विधि पूर्ण नहीं है तथा अधूरी है। गीता अध्याय 3 श्लोक 14 से 15 में स्पष्ट है कि ब्रह्म काल की उत्पति परम अक्षर पुरूष से हुई है। वही परम अक्षर ब्रह्म ही यज्ञों में पूज्य है। (ये ब्रह्म काल ही गीता ज्ञान दाता है) गीता ज्ञान दाता ने किसी और पूर्ण परमात्मा को अपना इष्ट देव बताया है गीता अध्याय 18 के श्लोक 62 में गीता ज्ञान दाता ने अर्जुन को किसी और पूर्ण परमात्मा कि शरण में जाने को कहा है। तीनों गुण काल ब्रह्म से उत्पन्न हुए हैं तथा उन गुणो से जो हो रहा है उसका निमित भी ब्रह्म ही है गीता अध्याय 7 श्लोक 12 में गीता ज्ञान दाता ब्रह्म कह रहा है कि तीनों देवताओं द्वारा जो भी उत्पति, स्थिति तथा संहार हो रहा है इसका निमित्त मैं ही हूँ। परन्तु मैं इनसे दूर हूँ। कारण है कि काल को शापवश एक लाख प्राणियों का आहार करना होता है। इसलिए मुख्य कारण अपने आप को कहा है तथा काल भगवान तीनों देवताओं से भिन्न ब्रह्म लोक में रहता है तथा इक्कीसवें ब्रह्मण्ड में रहता है। इसलिए कहा है कि मैं उनमें तथा वे मुझ में नहीं हैं।
swami mukundananda, or chinmayananda, just avoid the group that says “ours is most bonafide, it is ‘as it is’ ” and tries to sell you their version on the streets using foreigners… too much bias
The best Book on Geeta is "Complete Bhagwad Geeta explained in 4 Hours" Simple, Scientific and Shocking explanation. The book gives answer to all doubts of Bhagwad geeta
Tantra is the path of enlightenment created by Shiva, and Tantra included Bhakti. Come out of the Abrahamic mindset and stop associating Tantra with 'evil', I don't even know where that notion came from. Tantra is Yoga with emphasis laid more on transcendance than detachment. He is a Tantric. Respect Tantra.
See, and still a lot of ignorant humans at possibly their lowest spiritual levels want to understand Geeta as early and as easily as possible. Amusing. 😅
@@jayantchaudhary3584 @bachhi read other translations of Bg and any other puranas and you will know. That is your PROOF.. by saying ‘give me proof’ but only accepting information or translation by prabhupada, iskcon shows its weakness. From page one of Shiva purana for example you will get alot of what iskcon says disproved. 1- Prabhupada claims “there is no salvation in shiva” in Chaitanya bhagavat.. but page one of Shiva puran, linga puran and Skanda puran and kurma puran say the complete opposite 2- Shiva is not a demi god anywhere.. several vedas and puranas refer to him as the supreme lord 3- there are several inserts in your BG to force people to worship krishna only and not have any ishta devta 4- Lord Rama is also supreme, his form is acceptable as 100% of brahman, Tulsidas Ramacaritamanas gives enough evidence for this but Iskcon created their own gibberish to say Rama is only percentage of Krishna and even dared to call the hailed Saint Goswami Tulsidas a Mayavadhi 5- Mayavadhi is another gibberish word Iskcon invented because it doesnt like people reading vedas and choosing another path suited to them. Main example being impersonalism which is a totally accetable angle verfied by vedas. 6- theres more but you iskconites probably stopped reading at 1 because you can only accept information written by 1 translator “theres no god but krishna and no translator but prabhubada” 😉😉😉 right?
@@jayantchaudhary3584 read other translations of Bg and any other puranas and you will know. That is your PROOF.. by saying ‘give me proof’ but only accepting information or translation by prabhupada, iskcon shows its weakness. From page one of Shiva purana for example you will get alot of what iskcon says disproved. 1- Prabhupada claims “there is no salvation in shiva” in Chaitanya bhagavat.. but page one of Shiva puran, linga puran and Skanda puran and kurma puran say the complete opposite 2- Shiva is not a demi god anywhere.. several vedas and puranas refer to him as the supreme lord 3- there are several inserts in your BG to force people to worship krishna only and not have any ishta devta 4- Lord Rama is also supreme, his form is acceptable as 100% of brahman, Tulsidas Ramacaritamanas gives enough evidence for this but Iskcon created their own gibberish to say Rama is only percentage of Krishna and even dared to call the hailed Saint Goswami Tulsidas a Mayavadhi 5- Mayavadhi is another gibberish word Iskcon invented because it doesnt like people reading vedas and choosing another path suited to them. Main example being impersonalism which is a totally accetable angle verfied by vedas. 6- theres more but you iskconites probably stopped reading at 1 because you can only accept information written by 1 translator “theres no god but krishna and no translator but prabhubada” 😉😉😉 right?
Okay, seems like you are a great scholar coming from an authentic parampara. 😂 You first of all need to know that ISKCON just translated the Gita into English... This interpretation of the Gita called the Bhakti vedanta Bhashya, has been prevalent in the 4 authentic Paramparas, including Gaudiya Parampara. ISKCON again has just gave it to the world, in English.
Tulsi nindak na milo, paapi milo hazaar Ek nindak ke maath par, laakh paapin ko bhaar. I request sincere seekers to stay clear of those slandering other devotees here. Vaishnava apradha will drive you away from any spiritual contemplation. Dont follow preachings of Iskcon or prabhpada if it doesnt sit right with you.. We are sanatanis after all.. Not abrahamics.. But dont condone or participate in criticism of devotees. I have wasted more than a decade of my life is useless debates, nit picking and criticism. It leaves you filled with negativity. And innthis era of sudden heart attacks.. One never knows. So please dont waste time in criticism. 🙏
To be honest brother, that is well said and I agree with you.. but i have lived with poison since i read some of iskcons books.. once i wanted to cut off my tongue physically because prabhupada had written “there is no salvation in shiva” and i had read this verse aloud with my tongue. Dont you think it is a nexessity as a sanatani to protect other seekers or bhaktas with other ishta devtas to not fall into iskcons abrahamisation of sanatan dharma? I am asking a geniune question to you as someone who has clearly suffered a similar pain to mine
ye karma karma kya laga rkha hai sabne, karm hota hai. bachpan se suna hai spelling bhi dekhi hai. karm kro fal ki chinta mat kro. sirf tantric log karma karma karte hai
Actually it is Vedic as the concept of Para Brahman and the Aatma becoming one exists, it refers as Advaita. And if you read Bhagvat Gita carefully and with a calm mind then you can see the same concept said by Bhagvan shree Krishna. But this will only happen when shree Krishna sees you fit for it, without his will nothing will happen
The very concept of GOD is a western concept. The Indian Spirituality is all about becoming GOD, which means realising the truth. Ram, Krishna, Mahaveera were all realised Human beings. The story of Avatars is actually the story of Evolution. How we started from Fish and so on....
@@deadster125 people attain self realisation with Advaita. You just say it's useless because it didn't work for you, and your lecturers at iskcon tell you it's useless. It's cool if Bhakti works better for you, but that doesn't mean Advait is 'useless'. There is no 'one size fits all' in Adhyatma.
2. Padma Purana, Uttara Khanda, 236.7-11: मायावादमसच्छास्त्रं प्रच्छन्नं बद्ध उच्यते मयैव कथितं देवि कलौ ब्राह्मणरूपिणा अपार्थं श्रुतिवाक्यानां दर्शयन्लोकगर्हितम् स्वकर्म्मरूपं त्याज्यत्वमत्रैव प्रतिपाद्यते सर्वकर्म्मपरिभ्रष्टैर्वैधर्म्मत्वं तदुच्यते परेशजीवपारैक्यं मया तु प्रतिपाद्यते ब्रह्मणोस्य स्वयं रूपं निर्गुणं वक्ष्यते मया सर्वस्य जगतोऽप्यत्र मोहनार्थं कलौ युगे वेदार्थवन्महाशास्त्रं मायया यदवैदिकम् मयैव कल्पितं देवि जगतां नाशकारणात् || Lord Shiva says: “The doctrine of Maya (Mayavad) is a wicked doctrine and said to be pseudo-Buddhist. I (Shiva) myself, of the form of a brahmana, proclaimed it in Kali age. It shows the meaninglessness of the words of the holy texts and is condemned in the world. In this (doctrine) only the giving up of one’s own duties is expounded. And that is said to be religiousness by those who have fallen from all duties. I have propounded the oneness of the Highest Lord and the Individual soul. I stated this Brahman’s nature to be qualityless. 0 goddess, I myself have conceived, for the destruction of the worlds, and for deluding the world in this Kali age, the great doctrine resembling the purport of the Vedas, (but) non-Vedic due to the principle of Maya.”
Ram was not a normal human being but till his early teen years he went to all sorts of human emotions and after meeting his Guru then he had the realisation of who he really was. It is almost the same as Jambavan ji reminding Hanuman ji who he really was. Yoga Vasistha which is the conversation between Guru Vasistha and Ram ji and Valmiki ji (who is the author of this book too along with Ramayan)tells us the transition of Bal Ram to Bhagwan Ram. BTW Yoga Vasistha is almost as big as whole Ramayan
When Arjuna asked Krishna to share the teachings of the Bhagavad Gita again, Krishna initially resisted, mentioning that the first time was under unique circumstances. Nonetheless, Krishna agreed and offered the Anugita. Although still wise, the Anugita didn't have the same powerful effect as the original.
An Ex-Muslim Here:
I don't follow any religion. But I found the Hinduism and the Bhagavad Gita is totally not based on any religion. It's not a religion by the western definition, it's a philosophy book and way of life practiced for thousands of years and the beauty is, it still exists. The Himalaya, is the cradle of civilization. 🙏♥️😊
The greatest love is to not love God in return for his blessings, but to love him even when He seems to be indifferent.
Devotion means surrendering one's heart to God.
Manasa vacha karmana
Thought word action
Ichcha shakti gnana shakti kriya shakti
Ine of the best tikaa... Of BG id Dyaneshwari.... by saint dyaneshwar in marathi. Highly respected in Maharashtra.
The best translation and explanation of the Bhagwad Gita hands down. Plus, unlike most translators and explainers, Sant Dnyaneshwar himself reached enlightenment. I think the most decent English translation of Dnyaneshwari would be the one by Ghaisas.
The world 🌎 is a dream, a shadow, a play.
Awake, O fool, to the eternal day.
The truth is... It's not about how to read Geeta. It's rather about who is reading Geeta. The thought of trying to understand Geeta within a single lifespan itself is Human Ignorance. If you're not at that spiritual level of existence in your current lifetime to understand Geeta in its depth, how would you be able to decode it's teachings?
Understand this, and stay humble. It's harsh but true, no matter how much you try, it might still not be your cup of tea.
Gyaan, Karma, Bhakti 🙏
Every yoga Shri krishna teach says one thing surrender yourself completely to me Arjun
Do your work
That you must do.
Hare Khrisna 🙏 ❤
Rama and Krishna are not human! You don't understand. Krishna takes birth to display his pastimes to teach us the methods how to attain him. Shiva incarnated as Advaita acharya prayed to Krishna to come as Caitanya Mahaprabhu to teach people how to worship him in Kali-Yuga. If God displays humanlike qualities it is only to teach us proper behavior and etiquette.
There is only one Bhagavad Gita not many, it's in Sanskrit language. Learn Sanskrit or read many translations by many authors. The guest forgot to mention.
Agreed
Yes easy to get mislead by many biased translators.. especially the one currently famous with foreigners
But how can I buy that original bhagwad gita written in Sanskrit that u are telling because there are many books in internet in the name of original bhagwad gita, please tell🙏
@@aryanpadamwar5768 You can get any of 1. Swamy Sivananda's 2. ISKCON version by Prabhupada 3. Maybe from Gita press Gorakhpur. They have original sanskrit script with word for word translation, some with transliteration, and the meaning in their own words in English. Have a look before you buy.
@@aryanpadamwar5768 Gita press Gorakhpur any books related to puranas first refer Gita press then other publishers
Now I understand these words meanings very well
First part is GYAN which is shree Vishnu or lord Narayan
Second part is action which is shree Ram
Third part is bhakti which is shree Krishna
Now I understand it better
Thank you for podcast 🤠🤠🤠
So many podcasts and so much talk about how bhairava and hanuman changed his life and the host doesn't know what's बेलपत्र?
I know right!!
He who dwells in every heart, why seek Him in temples?
Seek Him within yourself, for there he truly dwells.
Geeta in 45 minutes - if Geeta happened in 45 minutes or 2700 seconds then Shri Krishn would have had less than 4 seconds for each of the 700 Shloks. No my friend Geeta was not revealed in 45 minutes.
"Prabhupada" all translated books are only the translation of actual verses not added anything.....
Actually he has added a bit. However, read the English translation of a book called Dnyaneshwari. The translation has been done by a man called Ghaisas. Dnyaneshwari came out of the mouth of a great saint called Dnyaneshwar, which was written down by a disciple of his. It is the best explanation for the Bhagwad Gita. Sant Dnyaneshwar was himself a completely realized being. Do some research on him and his 3 siblings, all of whom attained enlightenment. Their story, plus the book is extremely fascinating and enlightening.
Gita press
Is that why they translated all KarmaYoga to BhaktiYoga? 😂😂
I have physical copy of iskon printed Geeta but I read Swami mukundananda bhagwat Geeta online for great explanation
Who was Sri Saandipani to Sri Krishna?
Sāndīpana, is the guru of Krishna and Balarama in Hinduism.
Maharishi sandeepan was guru of shree krishan
Krishan ji left home to learn in childhood
When Arjuna asked Krishna to share the teachings of the Bhagavad Gita again, Krishna initially resisted, mentioning that the first time was under unique circumstances. Nonetheless, Krishna agreed and offered the Anugita. Although still wise, the Anugita didn't have the same powerful effect as the original.
He asked after the war when was resting
गीता ज्ञान दाता वास्तव में काल अर्थात ब्रह्म है
अध्याय 11 श्लोक 32 में पवित्र गीता जी को बोलने वाला प्रभु कह रहा है कि ‘हे अर्जुन यह मेरा वास्तविक काल रूप है'।
गीता अध्याय 7 श्लोक 13 में गीता ज्ञान दाता कहता है कि इन गुणोंके कार्यरूप सात्विक श्री विष्णु जी के प्रभाव से, राजस श्री ब्रह्मा जी के प्रभाव से और तामस श्री शिवजी के प्रभाव से तीनों प्रकारके भावोंसे यह सारा संसार - प्राणिसमुदाय मुझ काल के ही जाल में मोहित हो रहा है अर्थात् फंसा है इसलिए पूर्ण अविनाशीको नहीं जानता।
गीता अध्याय 7 श्लोक 12 से 15 का भावार्थ है कि जो साधक स्वभाव वश तीनों गुणों रजगुण ब्रह्मा जी, सतगुण विष्णु जी, तमगुण शिव जी तक की साधना से मिलने वाले लाभ पर ही आश्रित रहकर इन्हीं तीनों प्रभुओं की भक्ति से जिन का ज्ञान हरा जा चुका है वे राक्षस स्वभाव को धारण किए हुए मनुष्यों में नीच, शास्त्र विधि विरुद्ध भक्ति रूपी दुष्कर्म करने वाले मूर्ख मुझ ब्रह्म को भी नहीं भजते
गीता ज्ञान दाता ने स्वयम को नाशवान बताया है
गीता ज्ञान दाता ने गीता अध्याय 2 श्लोक 12, अध्याय 4 श्लोक 5, अध्याय 10 श्लोक 2 में अपने आप को नाशवान यानि जन्म-मरण के चक्र में सदा रहने वाला बताया है। कहा है कि हे अर्जुन! तेरे और मेरे बहुत जन्म हो चुके हैं। तू नहीं जानता, मैं जानता हूँ। अपने जन्म को गीता ज्ञान दाता ने गीता अध्याय 4 श्लोक 9 में आलोकिक बताया है जो कि सत्य है लेकिन उसने ये स्पष्ट कर दिया कि वो जन्म मरण में है।
गीता ज्ञान दाता ने अविनाशी परमात्मा किसी और को कहा है जो कि वास्तव में परमात्मा है
अध्याय 15, श्लोक 16 में गीता ज्ञान दाता ने कहा है कि इस संसारमें दो प्रकार के भगवान हैं नाशवान और अविनाशी परंतु गीता अध्याय 15 श्लोक 17 में गीता ज्ञान दाता ने कहा है कि वास्तव में अविनाशी परमात्मा तो इन दोनों (क्षर पुरूष तथा अक्षर पुरूष) से दूसरा ही है। वही तीनों लोकों में प्रवेश करके सर्व का धारण पोषण करता है। वही वास्तव में परमात्मा कहा जाता है।
गीता अध्याय 8 श्लोक 20 से 22 में गीता ज्ञान दाता ने किसी अन्य पूर्ण परमात्मा के विषय में ज्ञान कहा है जो वास्तव में अविनाशी परमात्मा है।
गीता ज्ञान दाता ने स्वयम को परम अक्षर पुरुष से उत्पन्न बताया है
गीता अध्याय 3 श्लोक 14 से 15 में स्पष्ट है कि ब्रह्म काल की उत्पति परम अक्षर पुरूष से हुई है। वही परम अक्षर ब्रह्म ही यज्ञों में पूज्य है। (ये ब्रह्म काल ही गीता ज्ञान दाता है)
गीता ज्ञान दाता ने किसी और पूर्ण परमात्मा को अपना इष्ट देव बताया है
गीता अध्याय 18 के श्लोक 62 में गीता ज्ञान दाता ने अर्जुन को किसी और पूर्ण परमात्मा कि शरण में जाने को कहा है।
गीता अध्याय 18 के श्लोक 66 में भी गीता ज्ञान दाता ने अर्जुन को अपने से अन्य परम अक्षर ब्रह्म की शरण में जाने को कहा है।
गीता जी के अध्याय 18 के श्लोक 64 तथा अध्याय 15 के श्लोक 4 में स्वयं गीता ज्ञान दाता कह रहा है कि हे अर्जुन! मेरा उपास्य देव (इष्ट) भी वही परमात्मा (पूर्ण ब्रह्म) ही है तथा मैं भी उसी की शरण हूँ तथा वही सनातन स्थान (सतलोक) ही मेरा परम धाम है।
ऐसा काल ब्रह्म ने इसलिए कहा है क्योंकि ब्रह्म भी वहीं (सतलोक) से निष्कासित है।
वास्तविक भक्ति विधि के लिए गीता ज्ञान दाता (ब्रह्म) किसी तत्वदर्शी संत की खोज करने को कहता है
गीता अध्याय 4 श्लोक 34 में गीता ज्ञान दाता किसी तत्वदर्शी संत की खोज करने को कहता है। इस से सिद्ध होता है कि गीता ज्ञान दाता (ब्रह्म) द्वारा बताई गई भक्ति विधि पूर्ण नहीं है तथा अधूरी है।
गीता अध्याय 3 श्लोक 14 से 15 में स्पष्ट है कि ब्रह्म काल की उत्पति परम अक्षर पुरूष से हुई है। वही परम अक्षर ब्रह्म ही यज्ञों में पूज्य है। (ये ब्रह्म काल ही गीता ज्ञान दाता है)
गीता ज्ञान दाता ने किसी और पूर्ण परमात्मा को अपना इष्ट देव बताया है
गीता अध्याय 18 के श्लोक 62 में गीता ज्ञान दाता ने अर्जुन को किसी और पूर्ण परमात्मा कि शरण में जाने को कहा है।
तीनों गुण काल ब्रह्म से उत्पन्न हुए हैं तथा उन गुणो से जो हो रहा है उसका निमित भी ब्रह्म ही है
गीता अध्याय 7 श्लोक 12 में गीता ज्ञान दाता ब्रह्म कह रहा है कि तीनों देवताओं द्वारा जो भी उत्पति, स्थिति तथा संहार हो रहा है इसका निमित्त मैं ही हूँ। परन्तु मैं इनसे दूर हूँ।
कारण है कि काल को शापवश एक लाख प्राणियों का आहार करना होता है। इसलिए मुख्य कारण अपने आप को कहा है तथा काल भगवान तीनों देवताओं से भिन्न ब्रह्म लोक में रहता है तथा इक्कीसवें ब्रह्मण्ड में रहता है। इसलिए कहा है कि मैं उनमें तथा वे मुझ में नहीं हैं।
Still did not get the right source! Coming to the basic question - Which version of Bhagawad Geeta should we read and where to get it?
swami mukundananda, or chinmayananda, just avoid the group that says “ours is most bonafide, it is ‘as it is’ ” and tries to sell you their version on the streets using foreigners… too much bias
Please read Bhagavad Gita As it is by AC Bhaktivedanta Srila Prabhupada. It conveys the exact message of Bhagavad Gita 🙏
@@verse3406no iskcon Gita is very interpolated
@@verse3406acchaa😂😂😂😂
@@verse3406That is worse than toilet paper
What is the name of full episode, please tell
The best Book on Geeta is "Complete Bhagwad Geeta explained in 4 Hours"
Simple, Scientific and Shocking explanation.
The book gives answer to all doubts of Bhagwad geeta
The irony that this video have so less views
ज्ञान,कर्म और भक्ति। हम्म बिल्व का जूस अद्बुथम😊😅😂❤👌💐जय श्री कृष्ण। जय भोलेनाथ। 🎉❤
i love lord krishna ❤ hare krishna
What is that leaf and bhel fruit he is talking about ?
Iska juice aata ha bhel Patra khehte ha mere hisab se
Bili Patra bhai
What bhel? It is Bel patra, bel fruit. We drink bel juice during summer in Assam
Woodapple is the fruit name (called as Bel in hindi) and it's plant leaf is "bel patra"
He is not tantric ? Pls don't elevate by saying tantric .. they belong to bhakti of God ..
Tantra is the path of enlightenment created by Shiva, and Tantra included Bhakti. Come out of the Abrahamic mindset and stop associating Tantra with 'evil', I don't even know where that notion came from.
Tantra is Yoga with emphasis laid more on transcendance than detachment.
He is a Tantric.
Respect Tantra.
i read a gita from ramkrishna mission you can try it
Gyan, karma, bhakti
And hatha. The four yogas.
Should we read the introduction part of bhagavad geeta
Geetha was explained in less than 4 mins that too it was just an eye to eye contact
See, and still a lot of ignorant humans at possibly their lowest spiritual levels want to understand Geeta as early and as easily as possible. Amusing. 😅
No
It was explained in some 40-70 minutes
You can't even fast read all Bhagwat Geeta slok
Also
It is not a rap that you speak everything so fast
Bhakti includes, Jnana and Karma, Stop saying crazy things that you become Krsna! We can never become Him!
bro read upanishads,
Which upnishad plz tell me plz quote @@Frutiy4870
I agree with you but there is a part of krishna within all of us and we have to look within ourselves to connect with that part
You've never actually read the Vedas and Upanishads, have you? You just yap what they tell you at Iskcon.
Radhe Radhe
Gyana karma bhakti? Wheres dhyana
Now how can we read bhagavathgeetha origional
But a simple Gita Translation from Gita Press Gorakhpur and also read the Jnaneshwari simultaneously.
45 minutes to aise bol raha jaise wahin sun rha tha ye 😂😂
Then which Geete we should read?
Geeta press is best
@@chetanchavan07of that which book ..i mean gita press has many Gita
@@nisargdelvadiya0625
Depends on you.
On how much time you want to give time.
So choose it
@@TechnologyQuest369 sadhak Sanjeevni😊
@@nisargdelvadiya0625
Great 👍
Bro destroyed ISCKON Casually
😂😂😂🤙
He talked so low about Bhakti as if he understands what Bhakti is.
In reality, he don't know even 0.000001% of what doing Bhakti actually means.
@@soumyajitpaul2798 achha
He does not know he is trying to connect the spiritual personality to material aspect
Which he is going to fail
@@deadster125 mannna mera rang sanvala
Jyate kra kre re behave tu rude baawli
Nice Analysis
Who is his guru?
03:03
Can someone recommend me that which book should I read ????
Read bgavadgita as it is by swami prabhupada
Gita press
@@SruthiBhatabsulately not
gita press
I think osho was replica of lord Krishna
😅
Understandable
Are you serious? Please stop disrespecting lord Krishn like this!
@@Anadi_Anant_Narayan I mean hows that wrong tho
Incarnation of Moses
Read swami adgananda. Geeta book dont based on any agenda
3:36
Brahmasutara, upanishad, Gita
नो ISKON
Why
@@jayantchaudhary3584 choice lol
@@bachhi ??
@@jayantchaudhary3584 it's her choice simply
@@jayantchaudhary3584 @bachhi read other translations of Bg and any other puranas and you will know. That is your PROOF.. by saying ‘give me proof’ but only accepting information or translation by prabhupada, iskcon shows its weakness.
From page one of Shiva purana for example you will get alot of what iskcon says disproved.
1- Prabhupada claims “there is no salvation in shiva” in Chaitanya bhagavat.. but page one of Shiva puran, linga puran and Skanda puran and kurma puran say the complete opposite
2- Shiva is not a demi god anywhere.. several vedas and puranas refer to him as the supreme lord
3- there are several inserts in your BG to force people to worship krishna only and not have any ishta devta
4- Lord Rama is also supreme, his form is acceptable as 100% of brahman, Tulsidas Ramacaritamanas gives enough evidence for this but Iskcon created their own gibberish to say Rama is only percentage of Krishna and even dared to call the hailed Saint Goswami Tulsidas a Mayavadhi
5- Mayavadhi is another gibberish word Iskcon invented because it doesnt like people reading vedas and choosing another path suited to them. Main example being impersonalism which is a totally accetable angle verfied by vedas.
6- theres more but you iskconites probably stopped reading at 1 because you can only accept information written by 1 translator “theres no god but krishna and no translator but prabhubada” 😉😉😉 right?
ISKCON spoiled everything.
😂careful.. they will name you karmi mayavadhi and other abusive words for not accepting their translation is the only true one
How proof
@@jayantchaudhary3584 read other translations of Bg and any other puranas and you will know. That is your PROOF.. by saying ‘give me proof’ but only accepting information or translation by prabhupada, iskcon shows its weakness.
From page one of Shiva purana for example you will get alot of what iskcon says disproved.
1- Prabhupada claims “there is no salvation in shiva” in Chaitanya bhagavat.. but page one of Shiva puran, linga puran and Skanda puran and kurma puran say the complete opposite
2- Shiva is not a demi god anywhere.. several vedas and puranas refer to him as the supreme lord
3- there are several inserts in your BG to force people to worship krishna only and not have any ishta devta
4- Lord Rama is also supreme, his form is acceptable as 100% of brahman, Tulsidas Ramacaritamanas gives enough evidence for this but Iskcon created their own gibberish to say Rama is only percentage of Krishna and even dared to call the hailed Saint Goswami Tulsidas a Mayavadhi
5- Mayavadhi is another gibberish word Iskcon invented because it doesnt like people reading vedas and choosing another path suited to them. Main example being impersonalism which is a totally accetable angle verfied by vedas.
6- theres more but you iskconites probably stopped reading at 1 because you can only accept information written by 1 translator “theres no god but krishna and no translator but prabhubada” 😉😉😉 right?
Okay, seems like you are a great scholar coming from an authentic parampara. 😂
You first of all need to know that ISKCON just translated the Gita into English... This interpretation of the Gita called the Bhakti vedanta Bhashya, has been prevalent in the 4 authentic Paramparas, including Gaudiya Parampara. ISKCON again has just gave it to the world, in English.
@@radheshyam16108 hmm I know are you telling him or me
Tulsi nindak na milo, paapi milo hazaar
Ek nindak ke maath par, laakh paapin ko bhaar.
I request sincere seekers to stay clear of those slandering other devotees here. Vaishnava apradha will drive you away from any spiritual contemplation.
Dont follow preachings of Iskcon or prabhpada if it doesnt sit right with you.. We are sanatanis after all.. Not abrahamics.. But dont condone or participate in criticism of devotees.
I have wasted more than a decade of my life is useless debates, nit picking and criticism. It leaves you filled with negativity.
And innthis era of sudden heart attacks.. One never knows. So please dont waste time in criticism.
🙏
To be honest brother, that is well said and I agree with you.. but i have lived with poison since i read some of iskcons books.. once i wanted to cut off my tongue physically because prabhupada had written “there is no salvation in shiva” and i had read this verse aloud with my tongue.
Dont you think it is a nexessity as a sanatani to protect other seekers or bhaktas with other ishta devtas to not fall into iskcons abrahamisation of sanatan dharma?
I am asking a geniune question to you as someone who has clearly suffered a similar pain to mine
Shiva is supreme vishnu is supreme all are forms of parabharm only chill leavediff sects@@vedicastroeng
Sandipani is krishna guru
Timepass krne baith gaye dono.
Bhagwan ki wani har insan k dil ko touch hoti hai, aapki nahi ho rahi h.
Jay shree krishna.
Bhai please Hindi namak ek bhasha hai uska upyog karke dekho applogo ka voice samjh hi nahi aaada English main mic main ghuse ho phir bhi
ye karma karma kya laga rkha hai sabne, karm hota hai. bachpan se suna hai spelling bhi dekhi hai. karm kro fal ki chinta mat kro. sirf tantric log karma karma karte hai
All of we are Vishnu avtar
False
We are part of him, not him. We can only realize him, not be him. Only their avatars know their are vishnu himself.
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Then you will become Krishna himself..? 🙂 this is demonic thinking. We can never become god.
Actually it is Vedic as the concept of Para Brahman and the Aatma becoming one exists, it refers as Advaita. And if you read Bhagvat Gita carefully and with a calm mind then you can see the same concept said by Bhagvan shree Krishna. But this will only happen when shree Krishna sees you fit for it, without his will nothing will happen
Advait is useless if one want to attain moksha in Kaliyug
It was important for Satyug
Not for kali.
For Kaliyug
Only bhagwan naap jap is needed
The very concept of GOD is a western concept. The Indian Spirituality is all about becoming GOD, which means realising the truth. Ram, Krishna, Mahaveera were all realised Human beings. The story of Avatars is actually the story of Evolution. How we started from Fish and so on....
@@deadster125 people attain self realisation with Advaita. You just say it's useless because it didn't work for you, and your lecturers at iskcon tell you it's useless. It's cool if Bhakti works better for you, but that doesn't mean Advait is 'useless'. There is no 'one size fits all' in Adhyatma.
Sing the praise of God, not for his sake, but for your own purification.
Hindi me nahi bol sakta hai kya tu
Shankara Bhasya of Gita
2. Padma Purana, Uttara Khanda, 236.7-11:
मायावादमसच्छास्त्रं प्रच्छन्नं बद्ध उच्यते
मयैव कथितं देवि कलौ ब्राह्मणरूपिणा
अपार्थं श्रुतिवाक्यानां दर्शयन्लोकगर्हितम्
स्वकर्म्मरूपं त्याज्यत्वमत्रैव प्रतिपाद्यते
सर्वकर्म्मपरिभ्रष्टैर्वैधर्म्मत्वं तदुच्यते
परेशजीवपारैक्यं मया तु प्रतिपाद्यते
ब्रह्मणोस्य स्वयं रूपं निर्गुणं वक्ष्यते मया
सर्वस्य जगतोऽप्यत्र मोहनार्थं कलौ युगे
वेदार्थवन्महाशास्त्रं मायया यदवैदिकम्
मयैव कल्पितं देवि जगतां नाशकारणात् ||
Lord Shiva says: “The doctrine of Maya (Mayavad) is a wicked doctrine and said to be pseudo-Buddhist. I (Shiva) myself, of the form of a brahmana, proclaimed it in Kali age. It shows the meaninglessness of the words of the holy texts and is condemned in the world. In this (doctrine) only the giving up of one’s own duties is expounded. And that is said to be religiousness by those who have fallen from all duties. I have propounded the oneness of the Highest Lord and the Individual soul. I stated this Brahman’s nature to be qualityless. 0 goddess, I myself have conceived, for the destruction of the worlds, and for deluding the world in this Kali age, the great doctrine resembling the purport of the Vedas, (but) non-Vedic due to the principle of Maya.”
Ram was a normal human being . Great teachings you are giving sir. All nonsense.
Ram was not a normal human being but till his early teen years he went to all sorts of human emotions and after meeting his Guru then he had the realisation of who he really was. It is almost the same as Jambavan ji reminding Hanuman ji who he really was. Yoga Vasistha which is the conversation between Guru Vasistha and Ram ji and Valmiki ji (who is the author of this book too along with Ramayan)tells us the transition of Bal Ram to Bhagwan Ram. BTW Yoga Vasistha is almost as big as whole Ramayan
You should listen it several times to understand what he actually meant when he said that bro
Vai Tera expression dekh k ulti ati hai ..ajib faces banate ho tum😑😑😑
When Arjuna asked Krishna to share the teachings of the Bhagavad Gita again, Krishna initially resisted, mentioning that the first time was under unique circumstances. Nonetheless, Krishna agreed and offered the Anugita. Although still wise, the Anugita didn't have the same powerful effect as the original.
Hey brother I recently purchased Bhagvat geet yatharth roop when start reading I am unable to understand how can i do ?