I also have a oculus rift, but the problem when playing in vr is identifying other aircraft because they become more like a pixel, you see them earlyer tho. You also need to keep in mind that you really need that gtx1080 at least to run it smoothly, i have a 1070 and it runs but not that smoothly and at minimum settings. I really recomend head treaking tho because it makes the game soo much better
@@Warkip There's a separate control for VR zoom in bindable controls. Its not a perfect fix but it does let you zoom in to better see stuff you definitely would never see with the base FOV of VR.
@@Warkip There is a vr mod that lets you use 5x and 10x zoom in VR (3dmigoto mod). With that mod it is much easier to identify a plane from greater distance. I use a HP Reverb with 4k resolution and 10x zoom gives a lot of help to spot others.
IL2 does have a history of having some of the finest flight simulators. I remember playing IL2 Forgotten Battles and IL2 1946 back when I was very young
Exactly, and now THEY, the realistic simulator creators have become the creators of IL-2 Battle of Moscow, Stalingrad, etc..., NOT these impostors who only modified the original IL-2 into this crap (can't call it otherwise in terms of simulation), done a lot of commercial, attracted a lot of newcomers to aviation knowledge and made a fortune. I'm not sad that they made a fortune, I'm sad that they call this... SIMULATOR. It doesn't simulate ANYTHING correctly, not even actual distances, lol...! If you want to see how actually an aircraft behaves in the air at whatever angle of attack, try either of 777 Studios genres (IL-2 BoX or Rise of Flight), X-Plane 11 (done by true aerospace engineers) and DCS (not all, but about 50% of the modules simulate the aerodynamics correctly).
My grandpa bought me the latter one, I remember playing IL2 1946 on an (now old) laptop from 2002-3 playing on low settings (not a gaming laptop lol those didn't really exist) and without a joystick. Still had a lot of fun even though I never really knew what I was doing.
@dabney offermein Hi! Of course. I'll list those with wrong FM (some more wrong, some less wrong, but still with unrealistic performances and behavior), while the rest are to be considered pretty much correctly flying/behaving: #1. MIG-21 from LLC. Has nothing to do in any way with the real plane's performances and behavior #2. Christen Eagle, also from LLC #3. All FC3 aircraft (yes, they are all having easily recognizable FM issues, the less wrong being the Su-25 and A-10) #4. F-14 from Heatblur #5. F-18 from ED #6. M-2000 RAZBAM #7. Mig-19 also from RAZBAM #8. SA 342 from Polychop (polycrap simulations) #9. A-10C I and II from ED (sharing the same abnormal roll control authority under stall conditions just like the A-10A in FC3, same flight model copy-pasted) #10. Su-25T from ED (similar to A-10s over stall AoA abnormal roll control authority) #11. L-39 from ED (similar to A-10s / Su-25s over stall AoA abnormal roll control authority) #12. Mirage F-1 (although new, basic aerodynamic effects should've been correctly simulated before release) #13. C-101 (both variants have utterly unrealistic FM) #14. All Belsimtek fighter planes (F-5, F-86, MIG-15). Not too bad FMs, but still with some corrections and wrong effects which need attention are just left to die. I don't think they care anymore as most do after years pass. These are the ones with problems and will most certainly die like that cause the FM is like the most unwanted part to be revised by the developers. All of the prop planes (except the Christen Eagle) and all helos (except the Gazelle) and the rest of unmentioned aircraft are behaving and performing realistic for their flight models to honestly be called accurate. The most exceptional FMs are those for the JF-17 and AJS-37 (for the jetfighters category), followed by the F-16 (some corrections needed at high AoA and beta for lift differential between the wings, but that's not very important unless you wanna try some tailside aerobatics and see that instead of a right roll you get a left roll or vice-versa) and finally the AV-8 which except some high AoA + beta (sideslip angle) glitches above some 400km/h (220kts) which make the plane have some very erratic movement, also has a very well done FM. Regards!
Judging by how wobbly the aircraft you are flying in this video you need to adjust the joystick input sensitivity. Google UA-cam videos on it as it makes your aircraft much easier to control.
Perfect video ! super commentary, professionaly done ! Last thing I wanna say. Fly this in VR and since that you will neverč ever play any other game. That experience is just like very new life.
I have been playing IL-2 BOS for about a year now. Mostly just setting up random scenarios of me versus AI enemies. Configuring my flight stick and throttle controls was a PITA at first. As more of a "casual" player, I was thrilled when I figured out how to take off and land safely (most of the time...) I am now working on trying to take off with the "normal" settings instead of the "custom." Just getting off the runway and maintaining level flight is far more difficult now....
It's engine is based on Rise of Flight. Now 64 bit version. Sadly a resource hog if you want to play it on ultra graphics. But amazing sim yes. Worth the money if you have joystick, rudder pedals and track IR / VR
I JUST MADE AN IR TRACKING SYSTEM FROM USING ONE OF THOSE CLIP ON BATTERY LED BIKE LIGHTS, I JUST REMOVED THE LEDS AND EXTENDED THE WIRES THEN REPLACED THE LEDS WITH IR LEDS, CAMERAS JUST AN OLD LAPTOP INTERNAL CAMERA I REMOVED AND WIRED TO USB. SORRY 4 SHOUTING LOL MY CAP[S IS STUCK : ( P.S DONT FORGEET TO LOOK AT THE PDF WWII FLIGHT MANUALS IN THE GAME FOLDERS.
It's my favourite sim at the minute. I just love certain aspects, the way the planes handles, and the damage model. I wish they would add more options to the QMB. If it had a built in mission editor like DCS I'd go from hundreds to thousands of hours in the sim
hi, I was looking for images and opinions about IL2, as there is a good reduction on steam, and your video was exactly what i needed : clear, good video, opinion.. thanks !
@@tristmoore5 yes i hesitate but on the editor website it is a standalone (with steam you must have Stalingrad). I am more interested in Bodenplatte because it is western europe and because there is the spitfire MkIX :-) . What do you think od cliffs of dover Blitz edition ? I hesitate between both, i read lot of controlers problems in CoD Blitz ??
A bit of a bitch about it, sorry, but IL is most likely read as "eel" and not "isle" due to the fact the actual full name of the plane comes from a russian name Ilyushin
I still haven't taken the plunge & bought IL-2 BoS. I read up on it just recently where modders have tweaked the damage model to where the wing doesn't get blown off so easily. The wing rarely came off in real life from gunfire. Hopefully this will be incorporated soon on the version Steam offers. Then I'll just wait for a sale price to come along. In the mean time, in bought Steam's IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 latest version for $9.99, replacing my old disc version. It's been modded somewhat too over the years. It ain't bad, but not as nice as the next generation, such as BoS visually. I find I'm used to the IL-2 series of controls since I've played them so long. I didn't care for Rise of Flight's controls nor DCS's. War Thunder has pretty visuals but I'm not going to mess with a keyboard airplane control. Once I do get BoS, I can get my WW1 aircraft from them, no need for Rise of Flight.
great video, out of curiosity, would u mind telling me your computer specs, you have the game looking great and looking smooth, look forward to more reviews like this.
My opinion DCS is more realistic overall with the engine management but IL-2 is focused on WW2 as a complete experience, i also consider DCS superior in sound as i have heard youtube videos of actual warbirds doing flyby and DCS sounds identical vs IL-2 sounds completely different than that.
There is no war in DCS, no fronline action, nothing to simulate a real WW2 campaign. Just several amazingly expensive (nicely modelled though) aircraft. Like a museum.
Very good review! Thank you... Do you use head tracking in DCS World? A must if you haven't... I bought the Trackhat which is the best quality and most affordable imo...
Played it for almost 7 years, didn't have multiplayer- we had to use a software called hyperlobby... Stopped at Cliffs of dover, was very buggy at that time
Thanks for the review. Are the new IL-2 add ons for WWI era planes the best when it comes to WWI era simulations? Especially interested in campaign mode.
I see black outs in war thunder when trying to turn and G's are high. One can also spin out of control and go into a flat spin or even lose a wing if one tries to turn too hard or climb too hard.
Yeah I hate people who compares war thunder arcade mode to simulator games while there is a simulator mode for war thunder that is quite like IL-2 sturmovik
I bought this game, with it's expansions/etc over 10 years ago. It was ok, I couldn't really appreciate it due to few players at that time and little knowledge base. There was only 2 servers active and they were in expert mode. I stuck with campaign and sadly got tired of it. Glad to see it has had a sort of resurgence for such an old game. It introduced me to some Russian aircraft that that had decent performance but in War Thunder, were "nerfed", performance was diluted or the sake advancement or research tree.
Damn.. full priced game for separate battles? I have the Microsoft Combat Flight Simulator from 1998 (still have the discs) and that game was incredible for a game of its time. Looking for something new to replace it... watching ww2 documentaries and battle of midway and battle of britain make me want to play lol
@@worldoftancraft its like $50 for a map that's hundreds of kilometers across, with all seasons of the year, and like 10 historically accurate aircraft. Things cost money to be developed, its quality.
Great video JoyPlanes. I greatly like IL-2 as I’ve been playing it for a long, long time. There’s a lot to like in IL-2 Battle of Stalingrad; I’m greatly excited about their new IL-2 Battle of Normandy, and have Pre-ordered it. I greatly enjoy the Pilot Career, Campaigns, missions, dogfighting, bombing, ground attacks. The maps are virtually spot on. The only things I don’t really like are 1. Total lack of radio comms and commands 2. Cockpits are too much of an arcade: you can’t click anything, nor can you hover the mouse over a gauge and it tells you information. CFS3, Microsoft FS, and X-Plane had/have this feature. More people look at the info box for airspeed and altitude than at their instruments. The IL-2 series, 1946, Cliffs of Dover and Stalingrad (now known as Great Battles) is probably the best Combat flight sim series Ever. I really hope that the latter 2 can have a long life span. The one thing I wish is that after Normandy they can go back to the Eastern front and add a few Russian bombers like the IL-4, Tu-2S, etc.
O sea, estás diciendo que IL 2 es mejor que war thunder porque se ve más bonito, se supone que se debe hablar en más específico sobre las diferencias en física y aerodinámica de ambos juegos, y lo que nombra este video como "diferencias" ya lo tiene war thunder, además que en war thunder tienes un modo historia espectacular también en simulador, el mejor multijugador de simulador, grandísima variedad de vehículos, muchos roles diferentes y no como en el IL 2 que tiene el mierda de modo Dogfight, o sea, no todos los aviones son para Dogfight y es una perdida de tiempo, en fin, son un montón de cosas que war thunder está por encima de este IL 2
Has IL-2 gotten a massive UI facelift recently, or is this a sequel of the game with the same name? The menus and whatnot of my copy of the game looks nothing like this :/ .
Sequel is a big word, but something like that. It's just the old sim, I mean "IL-2 Sturmovik / Forgotten Battles / 1946" has much more to offer: thousands of campaigns to download, theatres of war, nationalities to fly for. Here we have limited set of maps, limited set of planes: take it or beat it. Obviously, in IL-2 BoX you get modern game engine and way more advanced graphics, plane models and so on. But I still do have on my HD IL-2 1946. I just love to fly something like a Gloster Gladiator and defend Finnland.
It has controller support but you would need to try it, you can fly with mouse and keyboard but ideally for the best experience in terms of immersion imo flight stick with trackIR 5 is the best, VR i hear is real good too.
Very nice review. Good explanation of the basics and defiantly telling people to have patience. I have watch this game for time since it first came out and do agree the statement of being a pricey game. To get more out of the game, you have to dig into your pocket. Something than many may not want to. I can remember digging into the pocket for the game Flight Rising. Excellent WWI flight sim, but to get hold it all back then, dig deep into your pocket book. Very well done review, thank you.
This would make a great ww2 sim for Xbox. With all the military aircraft in mfs2020 it makes you wonder if a dogfighting theatre will be developed....time will tell..........8)
DCS is too hard to deploy weapons. You have to be a weapons expert to deploy bombs and do anything like for example in the A10-C. People will say, WOW look at this and then 1 month later when they forgot all they learned and have constructed huge cheat-sheet encyclopedias on all the tips tricks and procedures , they get frustrated and let their SIM-PIT just sit there and collect dust. Trust me , I know 30 people to who this happened to. We all just need something easier to jump into, bind our HOTAS and start shooting (so that we can take out our frustration on this horrible economy and sky-rocketing inflation while we watch our 401K's plummet into the molten core of the earth) on something virtual. Since DCS is not the answer (too complicated and too hard to join a server), then tell me which combat sim am I going to like best of ALL the combat sims on the planet? (irrespective of cost)
but i dont wanna learn! 😠 but I did pick this up for 7$ today on steam...Can it pull me away from War Thunder? Looks almost like WT....btw I still cannot get over that people use to actually do this in real life...and death....dammit that was hardcore!
I really like it. My only complaint is not enough planes. There is no Soviet Medium or heavy bomber like the Pe-8. We only have the PE-2 to fly against. Or transport liaison aircraft. Its not a deal breaker but the bombers (even as AI) would offer variety for both sides.
@@MrNonaste I dont think you understand what Im saying. If you launch the game before you have your joystick connected the game will not recognise the joystick.
IL2:Stirmovik is legendary game. You show us the 3rd generation of this game. The 1st generation have been released in 2001. This game have very long history.
Good reporting will a 16GB computer be sufficient? None of the instruments are click able? I'm definitely into WW2 and Korean ERA theaters. Thanks alot
What annoys me is this free to play setup on paid games. Especially on older games. Warthunder (free) is ok as you can earn a massive amount of content in game, but its setup to take a massive grind to do this. It’s original game birds of prey was a lot more of a fun grind. IL2 was also reworked from its original state (forgotten battles) where you had over 30 planes with the game to start, with expansions coming (paid) that added lots more planes. This version is a content gutted version or it’s former awesomeness. There is no where near the amount of content in this from its original even if you buy everything. I only got this game because it was on a deal £10. That’s how much what you get is probably worth. If you could have a warthunder style unlock system it would be better. Everything in this game is pay only.
There are 3-4 really populated hardcore online project servers (up to full 84 players in prime-time) and much more casual-style servers. The community is nice and helpful. Hop in! I could give you some intro advise
IL2 is a good sim but has focus on gameplay. It's not the best simulator, dcs is better and more realistic, especially the flight model. IL2 feels like a very realistic sim, but if u fly dcs you can really feel the il2 flightmodel is more simplified compared to dcs. il2 is a bit like the fc3 aircraft in dcs.
I fly in VR, thats where the real fun starts
VR is great for this simulator, by the way I love your videos of the airplane exhibitions.
@@Joyplanes thanks!
I also have a oculus rift, but the problem when playing in vr is identifying other aircraft because they become more like a pixel, you see them earlyer tho. You also need to keep in mind that you really need that gtx1080 at least to run it smoothly, i have a 1070 and it runs but not that smoothly and at minimum settings.
I really recomend head treaking tho because it makes the game soo much better
@@Warkip There's a separate control for VR zoom in bindable controls. Its not a perfect fix but it does let you zoom in to better see stuff you definitely would never see with the base FOV of VR.
@@Warkip There is a vr mod that lets you use 5x and 10x zoom in VR (3dmigoto mod). With that mod it is much easier to identify a plane from greater distance. I use a HP Reverb with 4k resolution and 10x zoom gives a lot of help to spot others.
IL2 does have a history of having some of the finest flight simulators. I remember playing IL2 Forgotten Battles and IL2 1946 back when I was very young
Exactly, and now THEY, the realistic simulator creators have become the creators of IL-2 Battle of Moscow, Stalingrad, etc..., NOT these impostors who only modified the original IL-2 into this crap (can't call it otherwise in terms of simulation), done a lot of commercial, attracted a lot of newcomers to aviation knowledge and made a fortune. I'm not sad that they made a fortune, I'm sad that they call this... SIMULATOR. It doesn't simulate ANYTHING correctly, not even actual distances, lol...! If you want to see how actually an aircraft behaves in the air at whatever angle of attack, try either of 777 Studios genres (IL-2 BoX or Rise of Flight), X-Plane 11 (done by true aerospace engineers) and DCS (not all, but about 50% of the modules simulate the aerodynamics correctly).
The original is still very good, using the latest Add ons increases the number of flyable aircraft to an astonishing level
My grandpa bought me the latter one, I remember playing IL2 1946 on an (now old) laptop from 2002-3 playing on low settings (not a gaming laptop lol those didn't really exist) and without a joystick. Still had a lot of fun even though I never really knew what I was doing.
@@Maverickf22flyer Can you list the 50% of the DCS that do it correctly? I want to compare to what I have and then get the one's I'm missing out on .
@dabney offermein
Hi!
Of course.
I'll list those with wrong FM (some more wrong, some less wrong, but still with unrealistic performances and behavior), while the rest are to be considered pretty much correctly flying/behaving:
#1. MIG-21 from LLC. Has nothing to do in any way with the real plane's performances and behavior
#2. Christen Eagle, also from LLC
#3. All FC3 aircraft (yes, they are all having easily recognizable FM issues, the less wrong being the Su-25 and A-10)
#4. F-14 from Heatblur
#5. F-18 from ED
#6. M-2000 RAZBAM
#7. Mig-19 also from RAZBAM
#8. SA 342 from Polychop (polycrap simulations)
#9. A-10C I and II from ED (sharing the same abnormal roll control authority under stall conditions just like the A-10A in FC3, same flight model copy-pasted)
#10. Su-25T from ED (similar to A-10s over stall AoA abnormal roll control authority)
#11. L-39 from ED (similar to A-10s / Su-25s over stall AoA abnormal roll control authority)
#12. Mirage F-1 (although new, basic aerodynamic effects should've been correctly simulated before release)
#13. C-101 (both variants have utterly unrealistic FM)
#14. All Belsimtek fighter planes (F-5, F-86, MIG-15). Not too bad FMs, but still with some corrections and wrong effects which need attention are just left to die. I don't think they care anymore as most do after years pass.
These are the ones with problems and will most certainly die like that cause the FM is like the most unwanted part to be revised by the developers.
All of the prop planes (except the Christen Eagle) and all helos (except the Gazelle) and the rest of unmentioned aircraft are behaving and performing realistic for their flight models to honestly be called accurate.
The most exceptional FMs are those for the JF-17 and AJS-37 (for the jetfighters category), followed by the F-16 (some corrections needed at high AoA and beta for lift differential between the wings, but that's not very important unless you wanna try some tailside aerobatics and see that instead of a right roll you get a left roll or vice-versa) and finally the AV-8 which except some high AoA + beta (sideslip angle) glitches above some 400km/h (220kts) which make the plane have some very erratic movement, also has a very well done FM.
Regards!
Judging by how wobbly the aircraft you are flying in this video you need to adjust the joystick input sensitivity. Google UA-cam videos on it as it makes your aircraft much easier to control.
This game and the WWI sim "Rise of Flight" are incredible!
Look up "Flying Circus", it's basically Rise of Flight 2 and IL-2 and Rise of Flight are also made by the same devs!
@@altiris6874 Rise of Flight is better
I honestly still enjoy il-2 Sturmovik: Forgotten Battles. Got it from a random games magazine like 15, 16 years ago.
Thanks! Great review of a great simulator! IL-2 Sturmovik is a legend! My favorite simulator! :-)
All of the addon's including Flying Circus and Tank Crew...some the best sim experience ever! Love the entire series.
Perfect video ! super commentary, professionaly done !
Last thing I wanna say. Fly this in VR and since that you will neverč ever play any other game. That experience is just like very new life.
4 years later il2 is still the best ww2 air combat sim. Good games on the horizon
“Remember. Do not believe what thy tell you at school.”
Subscribed!
As a VR player i´ve got to say i love IL-2.
best VR performing WWII flight simulator ,,, the VR optimization is awesome ..
Install flying circus and it won't be so awesome anymore...
DCS is superior
Will you review Il-2 1946, at some point? It's very old and looks dated but it's a good option for folks with tight budgets and weak systems, I think.
I think it doesn´t even look that dated.
a bit hard to get into, but really amazing otherwise, pretty much my favorite flight sim along with its older title rise of flight.
The learning curve is steep...but it's well worth it
That's a very cool intro ! Good video also. Love this combat flight sim and have sunk way to much money and too many hours into it !
This sim was fantastic!
I have been playing IL-2 BOS for about a year now. Mostly just setting up random scenarios of me versus AI enemies. Configuring my flight stick and throttle controls was a PITA at first. As more of a "casual" player, I was thrilled when I figured out how to take off and land safely (most of the time...) I am now working on trying to take off with the "normal" settings instead of the "custom." Just getting off the runway and maintaining level flight is far more difficult now....
youshould definitely start trying it online. There are plenty of servers with friendly community. Please check the official forums section.
It's engine is based on Rise of Flight. Now 64 bit version. Sadly a resource hog if you want to play it on ultra graphics. But amazing sim yes.
Worth the money if you have joystick, rudder pedals and track IR / VR
Better review: il-2 is the greatest ww2 air sim there is. Nothing comes close. If war thunder is too arcadey for you (it's a joke) then get this
war thunder sucks
I JUST MADE AN IR TRACKING SYSTEM FROM USING ONE OF THOSE CLIP ON BATTERY LED BIKE LIGHTS, I JUST REMOVED THE LEDS AND EXTENDED THE WIRES THEN REPLACED THE LEDS WITH IR LEDS, CAMERAS JUST AN OLD LAPTOP INTERNAL CAMERA I REMOVED AND WIRED TO USB. SORRY 4 SHOUTING LOL MY CAP[S IS STUCK : ( P.S DONT FORGEET TO LOOK AT THE PDF WWII FLIGHT MANUALS IN THE GAME FOLDERS.
It's my favourite sim at the minute. I just love certain aspects, the way the planes handles, and the damage model. I wish they would add more options to the QMB. If it had a built in mission editor like DCS I'd go from hundreds to thousands of hours in the sim
There is a downloadable mission editor. See the IL2 Forum
Just Google PWCGBOS
Patrick Wilson's Campaign Generator.
I thought it was included in the game files I can't remember the name but there is one there
hi, I was looking for images and opinions about IL2, as there is a good reduction on steam, and your video was exactly what i needed : clear, good video, opinion.. thanks !
Buy it just do it, if you can get boedenplatte dlc too
@@tristmoore5 yes i hesitate but on the editor website it is a standalone (with steam you must have Stalingrad). I am more interested in Bodenplatte because it is western europe and because there is the spitfire MkIX :-) . What do you think od cliffs of dover Blitz edition ? I hesitate between both, i read lot of controlers problems in CoD Blitz ??
@@lolorrr1318 I am sure you will be satisfied with BoBP. Now it's on a great sale btw: il2sturmovik.com/
A bit of a bitch about it, sorry, but IL is most likely read as "eel" and not "isle" due to the fact the actual full name of the plane comes from a russian name Ilyushin
I still haven't taken the plunge & bought IL-2 BoS. I read up on it just recently where modders have tweaked the damage model to where the wing doesn't get blown off so easily. The wing rarely came off in real life from gunfire. Hopefully this will be incorporated soon on the version Steam offers. Then I'll just wait for a sale price to come along. In the mean time, in bought Steam's IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 latest version for $9.99, replacing my old disc version. It's been modded somewhat too over the years. It ain't bad, but not as nice as the next generation, such as BoS visually. I find I'm used to the IL-2 series of controls since I've played them so long. I didn't care for Rise of Flight's controls nor DCS's. War Thunder has pretty visuals but I'm not going to mess with a keyboard airplane control. Once I do get BoS, I can get my WW1 aircraft from them, no need for Rise of Flight.
you can use a stick in war thunder
great video, out of curiosity, would u mind telling me your computer specs, you have the game looking great and looking smooth, look forward to more reviews like this.
The out side of planes in Il2 look so much better than war thunder
My opinion DCS is more realistic overall with the engine management but IL-2 is focused on WW2 as a complete experience, i also consider DCS superior in sound as i have heard youtube videos of actual warbirds doing flyby and DCS sounds identical vs IL-2 sounds completely different than that.
There is no war in DCS, no fronline action, nothing to simulate a real WW2 campaign. Just several amazingly expensive (nicely modelled though) aircraft. Like a museum.
Very good review! Thank you... Do you use head tracking in DCS World? A must if you haven't... I bought the Trackhat which is the best quality and most affordable imo...
I played IL2 back in the early 2000’s and it was a fantastic game even then. I’ve recently been getting the bug to dive back into it.
Yeah me too had enough Xbox and PS
Played it for almost 7 years, didn't have multiplayer- we had to use a software called hyperlobby... Stopped at Cliffs of dover, was very buggy at that time
Thanks for the review. Are the new IL-2 add ons for WWI era planes the best when it comes to WWI era simulations? Especially interested in campaign mode.
Wow, sims are expensive.
I see black outs in war thunder when trying to turn and G's are high. One can also spin out of control and go into a flat spin or even lose a wing if one tries to turn too hard or climb too hard.
Yeah I hate people who compares war thunder arcade mode to simulator games while there is a simulator mode for war thunder that is quite like IL-2 sturmovik
Une Pintade sorry. But no. It's not like il2 sturmovik at all.
@@-few-fernando11 Yes it is, how many hours as a fighter pilot do you have in war thunder?
Way More than I should... Arround 800hs, 1/2 tanks 1/2 planes
Dont get me wrong. I enjoyed WT for what it is, but there is no real point comparing the two
I bought this game, with it's expansions/etc over 10 years ago. It was ok, I couldn't really appreciate it due to few players at that time and little knowledge base. There was only 2 servers active and they were in expert mode. I stuck with campaign and sadly got tired of it. Glad to see it has had a sort of resurgence for such an old game. It introduced me to some Russian aircraft that that had decent performance but in War Thunder, were "nerfed", performance was diluted or the sake advancement or research tree.
I think you're still stuck in 1946...
Here's where you find modern il-2: il2sturmovik.com/
this game is so underrated! this is like playing WARTHUNDER with ARMA REALISM ... playing tank battles with all human crew would be fun.
Damn.. full priced game for separate battles? I have the Microsoft Combat Flight Simulator from 1998 (still have the discs) and that game was incredible for a game of its time. Looking for something new to replace it... watching ww2 documentaries and battle of midway and battle of britain make me want to play lol
You would not regret il-2. Now it's on huge sale by the way. il2sturmovik.com/
You're in nowadays, welcome. Enjoy the devalued Dollar and rise of absolute prices on such things.
@@worldoftancraft its like $50 for a map that's hundreds of kilometers across, with all seasons of the year, and like 10 historically accurate aircraft. Things cost money to be developed, its quality.
brother your review is great........
you deserve a like
IL-2 Sturmovik Cliff's of Dover is like dcs you can click at cockpit
What kind of operations system did you use ?
Great video JoyPlanes. I greatly like IL-2 as I’ve been playing it for a long, long time. There’s a lot to like in IL-2 Battle of Stalingrad; I’m greatly excited about their new IL-2 Battle of Normandy, and have Pre-ordered it. I greatly enjoy the Pilot Career, Campaigns, missions, dogfighting, bombing, ground attacks. The maps are virtually spot on.
The only things I don’t really like are
1. Total lack of radio comms and commands
2. Cockpits are too much of an arcade: you can’t click anything, nor can you hover the mouse over a gauge and it tells you information. CFS3, Microsoft FS, and X-Plane had/have this feature. More people look at the info box for airspeed and altitude than at their instruments.
The IL-2 series, 1946, Cliffs of Dover and Stalingrad (now known as Great Battles) is probably the best Combat flight sim series Ever. I really hope that the latter 2 can have a long life span.
The one thing I wish is that after Normandy they can go back to the Eastern front and add a few Russian bombers like the IL-4, Tu-2S, etc.
Good review. Thanks for the info.
Este sería un buen momento para comprar un buen juego, si tan solo no se me hubiera freído la tarjeta gráfica... very nice video btw
que honda con joy hablando ingles facherito
O sea, estás diciendo que IL 2 es mejor que war thunder porque se ve más bonito, se supone que se debe hablar en más específico sobre las diferencias en física y aerodinámica de ambos juegos, y lo que nombra este video como "diferencias" ya lo tiene war thunder, además que en war thunder tienes un modo historia espectacular también en simulador, el mejor multijugador de simulador, grandísima variedad de vehículos, muchos roles diferentes y no como en el IL 2 que tiene el mierda de modo Dogfight, o sea, no todos los aviones son para Dogfight y es una perdida de tiempo, en fin, son un montón de cosas que war thunder está por encima de este IL 2
Remember when IL2 had like 500 planes..
Has IL-2 gotten a massive UI facelift recently, or is this a sequel of the game with the same name? The menus and whatnot of my copy of the game looks nothing like this :/ .
Sequel is a big word, but something like that. It's just the old sim, I mean "IL-2 Sturmovik / Forgotten Battles / 1946" has much more to offer: thousands of campaigns to download, theatres of war, nationalities to fly for. Here we have limited set of maps, limited set of planes: take it or beat it. Obviously, in IL-2 BoX you get modern game engine and way more advanced graphics, plane models and so on.
But I still do have on my HD IL-2 1946. I just love to fly something like a Gloster Gladiator and defend Finnland.
Can you play with a usb-wired xbox one controller?
It has controller support but you would need to try it, you can fly with mouse and keyboard but
ideally for the best experience in terms of immersion imo flight stick with trackIR 5 is the best,
VR i hear is real good too.
What about Wings Over Reich? I think it has the best single player experience ever... comparable only to Falcon BMS dynamic campaign.
i might try playing this thanks for the review
Very nice review. Good explanation of the basics and defiantly telling people to have patience. I have watch this game for time since it first came out and do agree the statement of being a pricey game. To get more out of the game, you have to dig into your pocket. Something than many may not want to. I can remember digging into the pocket for the game Flight Rising. Excellent WWI flight sim, but to get hold it all back then, dig deep into your pocket book. Very well done review, thank you.
Thank you for the review Sir! And your "audio joke" in 04:40 is really amusing ;-)
This would make a great ww2 sim for Xbox. With all the military aircraft in mfs2020 it makes you wonder if a dogfighting theatre will be developed....time will tell..........8)
My opinion is... You need to look at the new power update in war thunder
I wish the devs put more effort in this like il2 1946, I wish there was bombers and better options for sandbox and creating missions
DCS is too hard to deploy weapons. You have to be a weapons expert to deploy bombs and do anything like for example in the A10-C. People will say, WOW look at this and then 1 month later when they forgot all they learned and have constructed huge cheat-sheet encyclopedias on all the tips tricks and procedures , they get frustrated and let their SIM-PIT just sit there and collect dust. Trust me , I know 30 people to who this happened to. We all just need something easier to jump into, bind our HOTAS and start shooting (so that we can take out our frustration on this horrible economy and sky-rocketing inflation while we watch our 401K's plummet into the molten core of the earth) on something virtual. Since DCS is not the answer (too complicated and too hard to join a server), then tell me which combat sim am I going to like best of ALL the combat sims on the planet? (irrespective of cost)
Are there any good games for windows 10? I miss Pacific Fighters! I want historically correct stuff too!
My dad loves to play War of planes, do you guys think he will like that one?
but i dont wanna learn! 😠 but I did pick this up for 7$ today on steam...Can it pull me away from War Thunder? Looks almost like WT....btw I still cannot get over that people use to actually do this in real life...and death....dammit that was hardcore!
Gunship sequel ww2 mobile
Ya i need a review on it. Looks quite a lot like War thunder for mobile.
I have IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 I bought from steam. I cannot get the controller to work with take off. I end up having my plane roll to one side and crash
Is it on PS4
I've played IL sturm on a TV channel and it's OK but looks like graphics are still lame ww1 no trenches no mud etc .
“second world wær”
Lol
I agree that IL2 is the best WW2 flight sim, the platform is continuously being updated and is truly excellent.
I really like it. My only complaint is not enough planes. There is no Soviet Medium or heavy bomber like the Pe-8. We only have the PE-2 to fly against. Or transport liaison aircraft. Its not a deal breaker but the bombers (even as AI) would offer variety for both sides.
I had the CD version but windows 10 won't play it, how can I get IL-2 to run on windows 10
Now I know what seems odd to me: The sound does not seem to be right! The motors of those planes should be louder and more pronounced.
Misleading title. Barely a mention of Sturmovik making this a big huge ad.
Great if you can get it to work. I have problems every time they update. This time it wont recognise my joystick. I give up.
you need to plug in the joistick before you play
ive never has this problem myself, and u have to connect the joystick before starting the game (or it will not be seen in game)
@@MrNonaste I dont think you understand what Im saying. If you launch the game before you have your joystick connected the game will not recognise the joystick.
@@bratech5831 Got it. Thanks.
Can anyone help me out on my lost install password.I haven't played game in years thank you.
4:42 You've earned a sub, man. Keep up the good work!
When is there an iOS or Android version?
Thing about these games is there is no pvp. War thunder hits that spot for me il2 is boring
Nice vid bro
it may be a great simulator, but it's a DLC based game, so it's an instant turn off for me
The biggest problem with this game is the barrel roll too fast ! It's like a toy!!
War Thunder only covers the major countries that took part in WW2
Is this a modded game now. Will it run on modern pc’s. have they updated the game over the years?
It is a very modern game, they make updates about every 2 months. Last one was 3 weeks ago.
How can we escape in the damage plane
You eject, its in the controls.
Nice, would like to see more in depth review about it xP
Where are you from? What is this accent?
IL2:Stirmovik is legendary game. You show us the 3rd generation of this game. The 1st generation have been released in 2001. This game have very long history.
Just RAMS them like a total noob lol 8:10
Did they remake this game or something? I remember playing it like... 15 years ago.
Is the same but much more improved
Check out our IL2 Stories
ua-cam.com/video/xCQkm6tRic4/v-deo.html
588 EUROS TO BUY THEM ALL... (DLCS ETC) OMG
il-2 is like war thunder but il-2 is realistic in any way
thanks for the video !
is it possible to play IL-2 with keyboard and mouse ?
It is, but not with great success. Most of the "normal" difficulty servers allow "joymouse" control, alongside with all offline activities.
Probably a good game, but damn I hate dlcs.
Good reporting will a 16GB computer be sufficient? None of the instruments are click able? I'm definitely into WW2 and Korean ERA theaters. Thanks alot
What annoys me is this free to play setup on paid games. Especially on older games. Warthunder (free) is ok as you can earn a massive amount of content in game, but its setup to take a massive grind to do this. It’s original game birds of prey was a lot more of a fun grind. IL2 was also reworked from its original state (forgotten battles) where you had over 30 planes with the game to start, with expansions coming (paid) that added lots more planes. This version is a content gutted version or it’s former awesomeness. There is no where near the amount of content in this from its original even if you buy everything. I only got this game because it was on a deal £10. That’s how much what you get is probably worth. If you could have a warthunder style unlock system it would be better. Everything in this game is pay only.
You may never develop a true flightsim without massive investment. That's the answer.
It’s not a new game. It’s a updated version of a old game with most of the content removed
Lovely. Thank you.
IL2 Sturomvik Battle of Stalingrad to be precise!!!!!!!
Yes
hi does this game have a decent player base with regards to online sim battles? im thinking of buying it but want to confirm beforehand thanks
There are 3-4 really populated hardcore online project servers (up to full 84 players in prime-time) and much more casual-style servers. The community is nice and helpful. Hop in! I could give you some intro advise
Danke werde ich kaufen!👍
Which version do you recommend me to install? Should I purchase the one you did?
6:55 did you just fire a rocket at an air target?
Was this for Xbox 360
IL2 is a good sim but has focus on gameplay. It's not the best simulator, dcs is better and more realistic, especially the flight model. IL2 feels like a very realistic sim, but if u fly dcs you can really feel the il2 flightmodel is more simplified compared to dcs. il2 is a bit like the fc3 aircraft in dcs.
at least learn how to pronounce IL-2 correctly if you gonna make a review about it...
God you're a loser
Ahhh I'll stick with IL 1946, I didn't have to pay $50/plane with that one.