What happened before the Big Bang
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 сер 2024
- The Big Bang, the colossal explosion marking the inception of the universe, remains one of the most fascinating subjects in cosmology. A provocative hypothesis suggests that this event may have originated from the tearing of spacetime by a black hole. This concept bridges black hole physics with the birth of the universe, offering a dramatic twist on traditional cosmological theories.
Black holes, regions in space where gravity is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape, are usually associated with the death of massive stars. However, their role might not be confined to cosmic endpoints. Some theoretical physicists propose that the extreme conditions around black holes could lead to phenomena that mirror the conditions of the Big Bang.
The idea stems from the properties of black holes as described by general relativity. According to Einstein’s equations, the singularity at a black hole’s center-where density becomes infinite and known laws of physics cease to function-might resemble the state of the universe at the Big Bang. This singularity is a point where spacetime curves infinitely, and normal understandings of space and time breakdown.
In this framework, a black hole in a pre-existing universe could potentially tear through the fabric of spacetime due to its intense gravitational pull. This tear could then serve as a seed for a new universe, initiating a Big Bang-like event. Such a scenario would align with the concept of a multiverse, where each black hole has the potential to spawn a new universe.
This theory also aligns with the notion of 'cosmic natural selection'. Proposed by Lee Smolin, this theory suggests that universes can evolve through black holes, with each new universe inheriting the laws of physics from its parent universe. Over time, universes that produce more black holes become more common, suggesting a Darwinian evolutionary process at a cosmic scale.
While purely speculative and still under considerable debate, the idea that a black hole could tear spacetime and initiate a Big Bang offers a tantalizing glimpse into possible links between black holes and the universe's origin. This perspective not only challenges our understanding of cosmological events but also encourages a broader consideration of the possibilities within our expanding universe.
Say there is a red square on the left and blue square on the right, separated from each other by one step of time. The red square is two squares in one. It is a square that is in its original space, and also a square that has just come from its original space on right. If the same is true for the blue square on the right, then both squares can each be two squares in one, each being part of two systems. You could mix one of these squares with another square without any area increasing, as long as the square now just becomes one square in one or one system in one.
Say the two squares switch spaces with each other infinitely fast non stop. That would mean both the squares would be in each other’s spaces at the same time, shoving each other away. But instead of shoving each other away, if both the squares each became one system instead of two systems in one, both squares could be in the two spaces at the same time with out shoving each other out of the way each becoming two 5th dimensional squares. With this technique you could mix two 3 dimensional things together with out them both expanding.
Let’s say the two squares are each still part of two systems. For instance, the red square on the left is two squares in one, it is a square that is in its original spot, and a square that has just come from its original spot on the right. If the square that is in its original spot on the left turns into the square that has just come from its original spot on the right, then it is like it has all of a sudden switched or come from the right, even though it was never on the right.
Now let’s imagine 10 different squares forming a circle each separated by one step of time. Each square is moving forward into the next squares space, all in the same direction and at the same time, like a second hand on a clock. Each square has its original space but each square is 10 squares in one, or 10 systems in one. If one of these squares in its original space become one of the other 9 systems, it can’t say it has just come from the previous space, because turning into one of the other 9 systems is no different then turning FROM one of the other 8 systems. So if it turns into one of the 9 systems, it is like it has NOT been in the previous space in the first place. A bit like the 6 days of the week that aren’t separated from each other by time. And besides that, if the original space of the system its turning into is 5 steps back in time, then it can’t say it has just come from that space because it is 5 steps back in time.
Let’s say you have two cars parked next to each other. One has just come from Texas and the other has just come from California. The car from California is two cars in one. It is its original self but is also the car from Texas, making it two cars in one or two systems in one. This same symmetry applies to the car from Texas that is parked beside.
If the car from California turns into the other system, it’s like it has just come from Texas even though it hasn’t, so would the car’s existence be based on a lie or the truth. The car from California turns into the car from Texas in a flash. If it did it slow and gradually it would turn into an infinite number of cars before turning into the car from Texas. If the car from California turns into another thing before turning into the car from Texas, then the fact that it really has come from California would be a lie. All of this is similar to each of the 10 squares being 10 systems in one, with a system in its original space turning into one of the other 9 systems.
Now let’s say you have a red square on the left and an empty space on the right both separated from each other by one step of time. As the red square switches spaces infinitely fast non stop, it will take up both spaces at once. Could this mean that the red square has become the two empty spaces and the two empty spaces have become the one red square. Or have the spaces and square switched identities.
If Friday switches spaces with the 6 other days infinitely fast non stop, the 6 other days would all have to fit into the space Friday is leaving behind. To solve this problem, why don’t we think of the space Friday is leaving behind as constantly whizzing past the 6 other days infinitely fast non stop.
Thank you for your wonderful feedback. This comment provides an inspiring perspective that encourages us to rethink the formation of the universe and our perception of time. By integrating concepts of color and time, it invites us to question the philosophical foundations of our existence. Contemplating the relationship between unchanging red and time could open new avenues for understanding the nature of the universe. Such thoughts propel us to ask deeper questions at the intersection of science and philosophy. Your insight serves as a guide in our journey to explore the complexities and mysteries of the universe.
One week goes around in a circle. if the 7 days were each frozen infinitely large 3 dimensional spaces. The circular week would be composed of time, but not the 7 days. If Friday is switching spaces with the 6 other days infinitely fast non stop, Friday would be taking the 6 o days spaces up all at once, so Friday would go from being a frozen 3 dimensional space to becoming 4 dimensional because it would now be composed of time. As Friday is constantly spaces with the 6 other days infinitely fast non stop, the 6 other days would have to all fit inside the space Friday is leaving behind all making one 3 dimensional day. Imagine if Friday and the 6 other days remain in their own spaces not switching. If Friday is separated from the 6 other days by time, but the 6 other days are not separated from each other by time, then the 6 other days would make one 4 dimensional entity. So now the same thing is happening with all 7 frozen days remaining in their spaces. Imagine 2 zero dimensional points. These 2 zero dimensional points are the only known red colour and only known blue colour to exist. Imagine if both these 2 zero dimensional points are each composed of 20 individual zero dimensional points. If these 2 points split apart into 40 individual points, you might think red and blue don’t exist any more, but if the all the dispersed points formed a system like the week with frozen days, red and blue could still exist. Imagine two groups of people, group A and group B. These two groups are separated by the shortest span of time possible, therefore there is no time In between these two groups. If one person from leaves group A and enters group B, then someone from group B would leave group B and enter group A at the exact same time, because time can’t move on until this happens.
Imagine a circle composed of 20 frozen 3 dimensional days. Each frozen day was either red or blue. So it goes red red blue blue blue red red blue blue and so on. Let’s imagine each frozen days as being red or blue, or being like groups A or group B. If one day switched with the day next to it that is a different colour, all the other days would each switch with the different coloured day next to them at the exact same time, because even though a day next to another day that’s the same colour are not switching with each other, they are still acting at the exact same time because they are still both separated by the shortest span of time possible that is not composed of any more time.
With seven days of the week being frozen infinitely large 3 dimensional spaces, Friday can’t be separated from Monday by time, it would have to be separated from Monday by time and space, because the 3 dimensional spaces of Saturday and Sunday would block it from getting to Monday.
At extremely short time intervals that are too fast for us to take any notice of, we have no sense of being. Our sense of being is joined together by extremely short time intervals that are too fast for us to take any notice of, so we shouldn’t have a sense of being at all. The physical world such as the ocean has no sense of being, so it would make mathematical sense for us to be the physical world such as the ocean, and be ourselves simultaneously. Every one says there needs to be someone observing a colour in order for it to exist, but not as many say we need observe a colour in order for our sense of being to exist, which is true.
A colour has to exist first before there is any sense of time moving on, any sense of being, or before there is any number.
Let’s say we are visualising plain red. This plain red needs us to visualise it for it to exist, and at the same time we need it for our sense of being to exist. We need to be seeing something or thinking about something, which is made of colour to have a sense of being and get a sense of time moving forward.
This plain red we are visualising is not changing. If we speed time up it will still look the same. First of all, without time moving forward this colour red would not exist. So could this non changing red be itself time.
Now let’s talk about us observing this red. At extremely short time spans we have no sense of being, at the same time, if our thoughts sped up we would be faster than our sense of being therefore loosing our sense of being.
If this non changing red sped up or slowed down, it still wouldn’t change. Now if our thoughts were longer or shorter than our sense of being, we would have no sense of being. This same symmetry indicates that this non changing red we are visualising must be us when we have no sense of being.
Could there be other beings that think we are the colour they are looking at and the colour red we are looking at is them.
People may think of time as some sort of physical movement or action happening. Now this non changing red colour we’ve been talking about, if we speed it up it won’t change. If this non changing red is itself time. It makes sense, because we can’t speed time up or slow it down, but we can feel like it’s slower or faster. Now this steel ball rolling down a hill, or anything that is moving, still involves colours that aren’t changing. So things moving may not be time, but the colours their made of are.
So we could be ourselves observing the non changing red, and at the same time be our non conscious selves as the non changing red. There could be other beings thinking the non changing red is them observing us as a colour as their unconscious selves.
A building block of time would not contain any time because it’s a building block of time. Imagine a bullet and tablet making one. You can’t see what this one thing is made from because the thing that makes the bullet doesn’t make the tablet and the thing that makes the tablet doesn’t make the bullet. So it doesn’t matter if the bullet or tablet are next to each other or miles apart, they could still make a non changing colour of time.
Thank you for your inspiring comments. Reading them felt like reading Friedrich Nietzsche's "The Gay Science" due to your extraordinary approaches.