Please read all the comments on all of the videos about Ken Livingstone.90% of people agree with Ken so ask yourselves why is our media after Kens blood?All this will be exposed and hopefully sooner rather than later!
+traci beacer This is zionists trying to 'clean political house' in england. zionists don't like to hear 'dissenting voices' - while they're committing war crimes.
John Sweeny often a good journalist but here rather unfairly taking Ken's words out of context in a way, getting on for as dishonest as, how Tommy Robinson has now crucified him..
Because Ken was changing the subject. The purpose there wasn't to ask Ken about actual policies. Suppose somebody made a statement that is anti-black, and is confronted about it and they try to change the subject to their policies.. And you wonder why the video cut when they tried to change the subject.
+SISTIC1 Ken wouldn't know the truth if it slowly ambled up to him and sunk its teeth into his gonads. But keep telling yourself that my little sycophant.
+SISTIC1 oh how very erudite and profound! Aren't we the literary Dostoyevsky of the UA-cam crowd? You should keep it up you have a potential shinning career in literary criticism when you grow up.
Where was John Sweeney when the Panama Papers broke?... isnt it more important to focus on the main issues of corruption, tax avoidance, going to war on false pretenses.. economic stagnation..
And John Mann MP is not known for his cerebral brilliance.with his uninformed perhaps paid for comments causing more trouble. In May 2009 John Mann received the American Jewish Committee's Jan Karski Award, how much money did you get with this award? When you went to a global forum in Jerusalem, (the only non Jew there) was he paid, or who paid your expenses? Is it Jewish money, Jewish donations influencing his policy?
Rubbish and you are a liar, otherwise provide actual proof of things he has said and done "years ago" that are ACTUALLY "anti Semitic". Note that any attempt by you to pretend criticism of Israel's blatantly racist, anti Semitic and murderous treatment of Palestinians doesn't count.
Ageing politicians like him have become addicted to the limelight of controversy to retain the public attention they have become hooked on. A timely warning to those still in the trade. Gardening is not only more useful it's also healthier !
"His version of history was garbled and insulting, suggesting that the Hitler who had already written Mein Kampf had not yet gone “mad” and was “supporting Zionism” - as if there is any moral comparison between wishing to inflict mass expulsion on a minority and the desire to build a thriving society where that minority might live" (The guardian, Jonathan freedland) Hitler supported the expulsion of jews and, in the opportunist mind, Zionism can help this cause. He didn't care one bit about the very essence of Zionism - Building a home for the unwanted jewish people. Without underlining this, saying that hitler supported zionism is a vicious attempt to create a false and twisted link between nazism and Zionism. If you don't see the problem here, you are either not very smart or anti-semitic. Or maybe its more effective to say - you are a racist.
i would agree with you, saying hitler IS a zionist is very much borderline anti semitic, but by claiming he only *supported* zionism, is literally implying the underlining of which you are referring to. you are completely historically accurate, but don't you notice how every other proponent of ken supposedly being anti semitic are claiming that this agreement never happened?
John Sweeney makes Scientologists look good.
Sweeney drunk on expenses again
What ever happened to freedom of speech?
Please read all the comments on all of the videos about Ken Livingstone.90% of people agree with Ken so ask yourselves why is our media after Kens blood?All this will be exposed and hopefully sooner rather than later!
+traci beacer
This is zionists trying to 'clean political house' in england.
zionists don't like to hear 'dissenting voices' - while they're committing war crimes.
Go do some proper journalism
Aren't you allowed to mention Hitler? I'm so confused about this modern left winged biased view on "free speech"
+Johnny Park
Apparently Germany's still having issues on that.
nothing much to do with "left wing" ..
hitler is obviously much more of an embarrassment to those on the right..
John Sweeny often a good journalist but here rather unfairly taking Ken's words out of context in a way, getting on for as dishonest as, how Tommy Robinson has now crucified him..
Funny how the clip ends when he starts bringing up policy
lol.. they cut off the video when he started talking about actual policies.. i do think Ken has walked into this one tho.
Because Ken was changing the subject. The purpose there wasn't to ask Ken about actual policies. Suppose somebody made a statement that is anti-black, and is confronted about it and they try to change the subject to their policies.. And you wonder why the video cut when they tried to change the subject.
Good to see an impartial journalist doing his job so calmly.
+Crouchy232323
Didn't see a real journalist anywhere in the above clip.
i feel sorry for ken!
Splendidandrews why is that?? for speaking the truth??
+SISTIC1 Ken wouldn't know the truth if it slowly ambled up to him and sunk its teeth into his gonads. But keep telling yourself that my little sycophant.
Splendidandrews here we go again! another possessive keyboard warrior with a loose nut!
+SISTIC1 oh how very erudite and profound! Aren't we the literary Dostoyevsky of the UA-cam crowd? You should keep it up you have a potential shinning career in literary criticism when you grow up.
lol the british are acting like complete fools literally feels like something from egypt
John Sweeney comes across as nut job here.
This is journalism?
Why is sweeney employed as a journalist by anyone.. let alone the bbc!
More bad journalism from sweeney
looked at those wolves
Where was John Sweeney when the Panama Papers broke?... isnt it more important to focus on the main issues of corruption, tax avoidance, going to war on false pretenses.. economic stagnation..
+Daniel Mansfield I agree, but its a shame Livingstone didn't insist upon talking about that rather than Adolf.
+Daniel Mansfield "Where was John Sweeney when the Panama Papers broke?"
He was off somewhere doing what he was told.
...Drunk and stumbling!
And so it began
I bet that Sweeny is jewish.
And John Mann MP is not known for his cerebral brilliance.with his uninformed perhaps paid for comments causing more trouble. In May 2009 John Mann received the American Jewish Committee's Jan Karski Award, how much money did you get with this award?
When you went to a global forum in Jerusalem, (the only non Jew there) was he paid, or who paid your expenses?
Is it Jewish money, Jewish donations influencing his policy?
Of course it's not anti Semitic if a labour MP says it......... Oh wait
Ken Livingstone is the man
He should have been expelled from the Labour party for antisemitism many years ago but many people protected him
Rubbish and you are a liar, otherwise provide actual proof of things he has said and done "years ago" that are ACTUALLY "anti Semitic". Note that any attempt by you to pretend criticism of Israel's blatantly racist, anti Semitic and murderous treatment of Palestinians doesn't count.
What a lovely guy
Rather Ken than the shit they have now
plenty in the Old Testament, New Testament and Holy Quran, Jehovah being the worst of critics. Maybe old Ken may have a point. Come Jesus.
Who's blowing up this story... ken Livingston or the press hounds grouping around him?!
He does not make a lot his limp
Sweeney on the hoy again
Ageing politicians like him have become addicted to the limelight of controversy to retain the public attention they have become hooked on. A timely warning to those still in the trade. Gardening is not only more useful it's also healthier !
This guy should stop talking
car crash tv
"His version of history was garbled and insulting, suggesting that the Hitler who had already written Mein Kampf had not yet gone “mad” and was “supporting Zionism” - as if there is any moral comparison between wishing to inflict mass expulsion on a minority and the desire to build a thriving society where that minority might live" (The guardian, Jonathan freedland)
Hitler supported the expulsion of jews and, in the opportunist mind, Zionism can help this cause. He didn't care one bit about the very essence of Zionism - Building a home for the unwanted jewish people. Without underlining this, saying that hitler supported zionism is a vicious attempt to create a false and twisted link between nazism and Zionism.
If you don't see the problem here, you are either not very smart or anti-semitic. Or maybe its more effective to say - you are a racist.
i would agree with you, saying hitler IS a zionist is very much borderline anti semitic, but by claiming he only *supported* zionism, is literally implying the underlining of which you are referring to. you are completely historically accurate, but don't you notice how every other proponent of ken supposedly being anti semitic are claiming that this agreement never happened?