Except they weren't cruel to you--their ancestors were cruel to your ancestors. You and the other person had nothing to do with it, which is why critical theory is so silly.
wow, I'm not a religious person BUT you don't need to be for that to make a whole lot of sense. ..the right default mentality = love ALL humans unconditionally, treat ALL humans unconditionally (by default) ...the wrong default mentality = You are X (ie, white, black, female, LGBT, etc) therefore I'll treat you according to that categorisation, and I may love you or hate you depending on that categorisation. Critical Theory is evil.
In order to reject racism by default one needs reject critical theory, whose followers are actively in your face racist to push their political goals while at the same time subverting the meaning of the word, "racist."
I don’t quite see how this is predicated on an adequate definition of Critical Theory - in your definition does CT = ‘being cruel or derogatory to supposed oppressors’? ...Wouldn’t it be more accurate to say CT = ‘rigorous investigation of systems of oppression’, such that it could be seen as compatible with Christianity? I just don’t see how CT and Racism are a set of binary opposites, both of which Christianity must reject. ‘Critical Theory’ is not the same as ‘Bigoted Liberalism’
Thank you so much for speaking the truth about this poison that has infected so many churches. I will pass this on to others. I heard Todd Friel speak of you and realized that my son was in one of your children’s classes at co-op. It’s good to know that many people are speaking out about this and it appears that you have a significant platform. Thank you!!
The church must acknowledge socioeconomic structural discrepancies within the worshippers in the same manner it distinguishes a sinner. Not act in obliviousness. Race in its pure essence is value-free. It is socially determined by historical contradictions. Evident in Black/White or rich/poor division
"The church must acknowledge socioeconomic structural discrepancies within the worshippers" it already does. "Race in its pure essence is value-free. It is socially determined by historical contradictions. " This is neo-marxist hogwash
@@holysmokes4493 So you decide that what it's being said it's wrong due to your willful ignorance of the topic. I though you were the rational ones? And talking about manipulative, Christianity has excelled in that department.
@Northwest River Yeah, that would work if we started from zero, on a levelled ground. The disparities between groups are still present nowadays and is beyond dishonest to just ¨not talk about it¨ as some people have proposed.
@@sceptre3524 It seems kinda racist that you would care so much.....? Are you being racist? Historians last time i checked said he was a middle eastern Jew so was olive skinned. But who cares? The only race is the human race.
@@felixhogel6854 “last time I checked”,olives are green and black. So we know there are no green people. Lmao.... that “human race” crap is akin to racist that counter Black Lives Matter w All Lives Matter.... you hv an issue with the facts, not my problem.
@@sceptre3524 I was just asking you because it looked like you were trying to make a racial inferiority/superiority thing out of the question of Jesus skin tone. Some black racial supremacists do that, that's all.
The central concern of critical theory is the eradication of slavery in all its forms. What do we then make of the assertion that critical theory is anti-Christian?
Critical theory is racist because it only oppresses people on bais of gender, sexuality, ethnicity, etc. Oppressed and oppressors are based on what they look like and not what they do. And in order to be less of an oppressor you have too give up power to an oppressed person to not be a racist. It’s straight up dumb to say I’m oppressed because of they way I look and there’s nothing happening to me. That’s critical race theory, judging people on their skin colour not the character.
@@alphaecho-juliet6884 What written sources by actual critical theorists have you read that are that childishly reductionist? Your description of critical theory appears to be based entirely on bad-faith second-hand reports that certain people have said about critical theory, and not from what actual critical theorists have written themselves. That's about as intellectually dishonest as it gets.
@@alphaecho-juliet6884 I never "told you you were "wrong". I simply challenged you on whether you've actually read any original works of critical theory. Have you, or not?
HORTONDLFN feel free to shoot me an email, we can exchange numbers and I’m happy to have the conversation and explain my thoughts. sammytexeira@gmail.com. I don’t know if there’s a way to direct message here but if so I can provide it that way.
Critical theory says that it’s okay to be cruel to “oppressor” groups because they were cruel to you first. Christianity says to turn the other cheek.
Precisely. Well said. Christian forgiveness breaks the cycle of hatred and oppression. And this is why it endures.
Except they weren't cruel to you--their ancestors were cruel to your ancestors. You and the other person had nothing to do with it, which is why critical theory is so silly.
Where do you people GET this stuff? Certainly not by actually reading any Critical Theory.
@@ntodd6627 Show us where we're wrong.
Really good quote!!
Critical theory is Lucifer's argument on why he should be the one sitting on God's throne.
The truth shall set you free my friend , embrace truth over feelings
wow, I'm not a religious person BUT you don't need to be for that to make a whole lot of sense. ..the right default mentality = love ALL humans unconditionally, treat ALL humans unconditionally (by default) ...the wrong default mentality = You are X (ie, white, black, female, LGBT, etc) therefore I'll treat you according to that categorisation, and I may love you or hate you depending on that categorisation. Critical Theory is evil.
That conclusion is not logically derived from your premise.
😂😂😂
Geez! Not bad for a white supremacist lol
@@ntodd6627 Oh sorry you posted 11 months ago. Have you changed your mind since about "CRT is not racist"?
In order to reject racism by default one needs reject critical theory, whose followers are actively in your face racist to push their political goals while at the same time subverting the meaning of the word, "racist."
Great clip here. I gotta admit, though. I wanna know what that girl with her hand up wanted to ask. ;0) (Curiosity is forever!)
Well said Neil, with passion and truth
I don’t quite see how this is predicated on an adequate definition of Critical Theory - in your definition does CT = ‘being cruel or derogatory to supposed oppressors’? ...Wouldn’t it be more accurate to say CT = ‘rigorous investigation of systems of oppression’, such that it could be seen as compatible with Christianity? I just don’t see how CT and Racism are a set of binary opposites, both of which Christianity must reject. ‘Critical Theory’ is not the same as ‘Bigoted Liberalism’
Why didn't you respond to River?
CRT is Bigoted Marxism, it depends on the same basic ideas, and also appears to use them to gain power.
Thank you so much for speaking the truth about this poison that has infected so many churches. I will pass this on to others. I heard Todd Friel speak of you and realized that my son was in one of your children’s classes at co-op. It’s good to know that many people are speaking out about this and it appears that you have a significant platform. Thank you!!
Amen!
Neil breaks down every time he talks about racism and crt.
that girl raising her hand tho.. LOL
τελειο βιντεο
#politicallyagnostic
#southsiderabbi
If this man would be more bold with the truth among the friends favor he seeks in these days . . .
The church must acknowledge socioeconomic structural discrepancies within the worshippers in the same manner it distinguishes a sinner. Not act in obliviousness.
Race in its pure essence is value-free. It is socially determined by historical contradictions. Evident in Black/White or rich/poor division
"The church must acknowledge socioeconomic structural discrepancies within the worshippers"
it already does.
"Race in its pure essence is value-free. It is socially determined by historical contradictions. "
This is neo-marxist hogwash
Why can't wokeness speak plain English? It all sounds so manipulative and mealymouthed that it's difficult to pay attention longer than two sentences.
@@holysmokes4493 So you decide that what it's being said it's wrong due to your willful ignorance of the topic. I though you were the rational ones?
And talking about manipulative, Christianity has excelled in that department.
@Northwest River Yeah, that would work if we started from zero, on a levelled ground. The disparities between groups are still present nowadays and is beyond dishonest to just ¨not talk about it¨ as some people have proposed.
Neil, well why is your Christ “white”?
@@Bluecatwing The messiah is in modern terms “black”.... facts!
@@sceptre3524 It seems kinda racist that you would care so much.....? Are you being racist?
Historians last time i checked said he was a middle eastern Jew so was olive skinned.
But who cares? The only race is the human race.
@@felixhogel6854 “last time I checked”,olives are green and black. So we know there are no green people. Lmao.... that “human race” crap is akin to racist that counter Black Lives Matter w All Lives Matter.... you hv an issue with the facts, not my problem.
@@sceptre3524 You know what i mean - olibe skinned refers to light brown:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olive_skin
@@sceptre3524 I was just asking you because it looked like you were trying to make a racial inferiority/superiority thing out of the question of Jesus skin tone. Some black racial supremacists do that, that's all.
The central concern of critical theory is the eradication of slavery in all its forms. What do we then make of the assertion that critical theory is anti-Christian?
Critical theory is racist because it only oppresses people on bais of gender, sexuality, ethnicity, etc. Oppressed and oppressors are based on what they look like and not what they do. And in order to be less of an oppressor you have too give up power to an oppressed person to not be a racist. It’s straight up dumb to say I’m oppressed because of they way I look and there’s nothing happening to me. That’s critical race theory, judging people on their skin colour not the character.
@@alphaecho-juliet6884 What written sources by actual critical theorists have you read that are that childishly reductionist? Your description of critical theory appears to be based entirely on bad-faith second-hand reports that certain people have said about critical theory, and not from what actual critical theorists have written themselves. That's about as intellectually dishonest as it gets.
n todd you just told me that I’m wrong yet you haven’t proven it, critical race theory is bad doesn’t matter if it’s in good faith.
@@alphaecho-juliet6884 I never "told you you were "wrong". I simply challenged you on whether you've actually read any original works of critical theory.
Have you, or not?
n todd I haven’t read “original work” but I’ve done research on it.
Is this a joke?
What part prompted your question?
HORTONDLFN everything he says after 2:50. I’m not writing it all here but I’m happy to discuss it if you want to chat.
@@samueltexeira2734 how to do that?
HORTONDLFN feel free to shoot me an email, we can exchange numbers and I’m happy to have the conversation and explain my thoughts. sammytexeira@gmail.com. I don’t know if there’s a way to direct message here but if so I can provide it that way.
is WHAT a joke? there's this thing called context.
ok so he's a chemist talking about Social Critical Theory?
wtfffffffff?
Logic is logic in any topic.
And what are your accolades to determine validity of YOUR comment?
This does sound like a joke
Would you explain why? I seem to have missed it.