Hello you beauties. Access all episodes 10 hours earlier than UA-cam by Subscribing on Spotify - spoti.fi/2LSimPn or Apple Podcasts - apple.co/2MNqIgw. Here’s the timestamps: 00:00 The Myth of Pervasive Misogyny 04:49 Why Does the Media Focus on Anti-Female Bias? 18:18 How the Influx of Women in Academia Has Changed Education 23:06 Why Women Are More Egalitarian Than Men 31:53 Should We Still Trust Mainstream Science & Media Today? 42:18 Are Gender Disparities Caused By the Patriarchy? 49:38 The Gendered Differences in Slut-Shaming 53:06 Why Do People Hate Evolutionary Psychology? 1:03:08 Which of Cory’s Conclusions Has Been Most Controversial? 1:09:53 Why Academia is Censoring Studies Like Cory’s 1:22:41 The Middle-Aged, White, Female Overlords of Academia 1:32:33 What’s Next for Cory
Ello dude ..your casts are my go to listen on my 6am walk...I'm 57 and loaded my pension so I could retire early ..your pods are my citadel of fitness both mentally and physically ..love your style and quality of interview....your guests are the the wings lifting edge....or ..the fuckin dogz bollox of truthful opinion
@chriswillx I'm redpill/manosphere partly because of interviews like this. They were the 1st to popularize these talking points, especially the more intellectual side of the manosphere
Luxury beliefs that a) signal false virtue and b) are rather similar to "Munchausen syndrome by proxy", where someone "gets attention by faking or producing symptoms of illness in someone else, usually their child", except in this case, these middle managers are outsourcing the child role to ''vulnerable groups''.
I came up with a term that we can use to describe a certain kind of pernicious behavior. Vicarious victimhood. This describes people who feel the need to play the victim, but have never actually been victimized, so instead they choose to experience it vicariously through others that they perceive as marginalized. This vicarious victimhood feeds directly into empty virtue signaling.
Victimhood itself has become a source of privilege in American life. People feel entitled to literally 5 million dollar pay outs because they perceive themselves as victims and those ludicrous beliefs garner attention from public officials as legitimate.
Weaponized victimhood. The ability to use perceived oppression as a tool/weapon for one's own personal benefit. "Vicarious victimhood" - thus confers the ability for one who has not been oppressed to LEECH onto that "bandwagon" in order to gain that "tool". (Yes, that was a deliberate intent to equate them to parasites.) For some people, however, there is a built-in "karma"... Most people who convince themselves that they are somehow oppressed WILL be oppressed... by their own internal reactions to their self-delusion. Unfortunately, this is also true of people who ALLOW themselves to BE convinced (by others) of their oppressed status. As the meme goes... "Play stupid games. Win stupid prizes."
"In the fields that are dominated by women people are not particularly concerned about getting more men, whereas in the fields that are dominated by men they are desperately trying to get more women". This is a good summary about what is happenning nowadays. Cheers from Spain.
No matter how they are distributed, the narrative will keep being pushed that there isn't enough women in a certain field, or black people in a certain field. Moving them into a certain field means they will leave another field, so the cycle will just continue
As a male in nursing (now retired) I had one instructor in my masters program that tole me to my face that I would not pass her required class because she did not believe that men should be a nurse. In my bachelors program, one of the male students committed suicide due to anti-male harassment from a group of professors.
X able nurse here. They bulky abuse and make sure you know your job is at their will. Most are angry, single, and unhappy. Give a person power with low self esteem and you get tyrants. Man or woman
I’m a man and I described to my dr a number of times where my wife had thrown things at me, hit me and emotionally abused me. Neither of us recognised this was domestic violence. According to the publicity campaigns, domestic violence is about men attacking women. If a woman is seen attacking a man, it is assumed he did something bad and he deserves it
Yes and this is the case with infidelity and divorce as well. If he cheats, he’s a horrible husband. If she cheats, he’s a horrible husband. If he leaves, he’s a deadbeat. If she leaves, he’s a deadbeat. If he struggles, she leaves and finds a winner. Women care not about a man’s struggles, they wait at the finish line and bang the winners.
I've seen my Da battered on a number of occasions. My Ma just gets away with it. One woman hit me and she was gone the next day. I watched and learned.
Good on you for recognising violence and abuse for what it is… violence and abuse. Now that you recognise this for what it is, with respect and self-love, what do you do next…?
She said something extremely important that gets glossed over -- which is: You come up with an 'unpopular' finding and the reaction is "This is bad research" ..... this is the silver bullet problem in peer-review (at least in the humanities and social sciences). If your findings are in-line with the narrative favored by the peerage ... you have a chance to publish (which is everything for your career). If you find something that runs counter to that narrative .... you won't make out it of that review. You'll be told there's some methodological problem with your work.
Hasn’t this been ever-thus. Galileo was decried a heretic for declaring the earth orbits the sun. These institutes and their tightly held beliefs are no better than many religious doctrines of old and alive today. It’s a shame. We can’t connect with our past and have a honest discussion on the human ape to inform our future. It seems evolutionary psychology may just go underground until a more open minded paradigm emerges.
Interesting conversation. As someone in academia and psychology, a lot of this is very recognizable. There is this weird culture where female academics are given all the priviliges and advantages, while still being seen as the victims and oppressed group. Both men and women overwhelmingly participate in this illusion. I've done a few (five I think) job interviews for after my phd and I couldn't help noticing that all the comittees that interviewed me were either 100% or at least 80% female. In the building I work there are posters that say "no means no" regarding sexual conduct or other such matters, I checked the stats in the area I live, sexual harassment is extremely rare here, as my experience indicates as well. Which is why I always found these posters so odd, probably a HR decision. The HR department has tried to equalize the number of male and female student in computer science more by reducing sexism (of which there is no indication) for over 5 years now, without any success. There were many programs available during my phd that were only available to women. And I could give many more examples like this. I don't necesarrily mind it either, I was never obstructed in my own work because of being a man, but it always seemed really odd to me that my female and male colleagues still really wanted to participate in this victimhood role of women in academia. It seems like a complete delusion to me.
I haven’t watched the video yet, but your comment caught my attention. My 3 daughters all had talents that would lend themselves to high earning stem fields. I offered instruction and tools for this. None were interested and are pursuing lower wage careers. They had posters all over their schools encouraging them to get into these fields, they just aren’t interested. Wage gap indeed… in my degree program there were 3 tracks. 2 were technical and paid well. 1 was neither techy nor highly paid. Our program was charitably 10% women. Not a single one picked the high earning tech tracks. When asked, “I’m not interested in that”. Fast forward many years and a disconcerting percentage are complaining about salary and the patriarchy. Sigh…
Male here to say what I don’t say publicly. I teach in academia currently and I don’t talk in meetings. I no longer chit chat with faculty in the halls. If I talk to other male teachers we close the door to our office and talk quietly. In class I act as if I’m into the current thing and my marks have gone way up. The other male teachers pretty much do the same thing. Last year a male teacher marked according to what they thought would be industry standards for their subject. This year his contract wasn’t renewed. Us male instructors are seeing our academic careers as a job, show up, punch the clock, keep our mouths shut. Our school is now 80% female students. Over half identify as LGBTQ+. We’re constantly told by students that we’re privileged, oppressive and our interests are only valid is we act accordingly. Or hiring policies openly say they favour marginalized people, white makes need not apply.
Non-academic here. But I am curious about lesbians and gay people. Had a few friends who were gay. Someone in this thread made a comment on, apparently there are lots of lesbians in academia. 🤔I've observed similar things on sexuality and human achievement. I tried to figure out why some people are gay or lesbian, putting together a few things I've noticed, over the years. My idea is 2 words as a new concept: gay privilege. Here's my lay guess, how that make sense: Are gays and lesbians actually privileged now? My argument: Gay & lesbian Americans have higher incomes than straights, higher education levels than straights. Like lesbians in academia. Why is that? There is some evidence of higher IQs in those lesbian and gay populations, than the general norm. Why is that? A high level woman soccer (football) player I know (straight girl) told me lesbians at the high end of woman's sports, are vastly over-represented. 🤔Why this lesbian sports pattern? My guess is, something is going on, biologically....that needs to be unpacked by academics, if we are to get past our biases. I read an old article on Breitbart by Milo Yinnopoulos, "Sorry girls, all the smartest people in the world are all men." (searchable online) He says the evidence says gender and IQ are related. But not in the way people think. On average, there is no real difference in male female IQ....except on the high and low end. Basically men have more geniuses, more idiots. So the math balances. Milo is gay, his opinion seems to be the reason for extremely high IQ people being mostly male, even though the genders general IQ is equal, is that nature takes more chances on men, tries new formulas out in evolution. You see the same thing in other species: for instance in birds, beak size varies more in bird males, than bird females. Feminist Camille Paglia put it this way: "The reason there are are more male geniuses, more male Mozarts than female ones, is there are more male Jack the Rippers." In other words, evolution rolls the dice on males, more than females Tries new things, genetically. That may also explain why 98% of the homeless are males: more male losers, as Mother Nature rolls the dice, often fails. That risk taking rolling of the dice by nature is far less common in females, than males, apparently. Thus female IQ tends to cluster around the middle, whereas even though men and women as groups are the same in IQ, you get far more low IQ Homer Simpson males than females, who tend to be mostly Marge Simpsons. As well as more dumb Homer males, you get more high IQ Mozart males as a mathematical compliment, to keep the genders equal, in the math of evolution. My guess is, gay men in particular, are nature trying out new biological formulas, getting some things right, like higher IQ, but other things that don't work, like no attraction to the other gender. Thus I've long thought the idea of condemning males for being gay, was absurd. Lesbians? More of the same, but less common than gay men. That may explain why so many high achieving lesbians are in academia and on the soccer pitch. I think to win acceptance for sexual minorities, the truth has to finally win the day. If a good evidence based case can be made, based on science for what I said, a lot fewer people would come up with their nonsense prejudiced views on gay people. But in the mean time, if I'm right, people will be angry, if this is true. Why? As my favorite comedian the late George Carlin once said, "The truth shall set you free. But first, it will piss you off." Strangely enough, the people who generally oppose such research into the origins of sexuality and IQ, which might actually vindicate gay people, tend to often be gay people or their allies....all for "harm avoidance". I don't think there is anything to fear. Except ignorance. If I am correct in my speculation, then yes of course, gays were discriminated against heavily in history. The gay theorists are right about that. But at same time gays and lesbians are likely now over represented at university and in the media and in positions of power and wealth and influence now, based on higher IQ levels...thus Gay Privilege. I think the creators of Family Guy already know this. They have some pretty funny cartoons of gay rich people. Cheers. 🍻🍺
The scariest thing about my degree in psychology was a professor literally teaching students to over medicate a person to the point of not being functional claiming it was better for the patient than their depression.
Had the same exact moment when I was doing my psych rotation in medical school. The rationale is that you want to zombify them and then slowly wean them off the medication until they regain consciousness but aren’t having active hallucinations therefore you can have a conversation with them. But it’s quite jarring.
You MUST read the books "Anatomy of an Epidemic" by Robert Whitaker and Psychiatryland-- can't remember the name of the author-- but he's very nice. Life did not used to be like this. And, of course read anything by Dr. Peter Breggin
I'm a Boomer. I can confirm that there used to be a bias in hiring for "traditionally" male jobs. But there were reasons for it, and it wasn't limited to women. One example I can point to is when I worked part-time at a GE warehouse in Sacramento, CA. There was another part-time guy there as well. A full-time job came up as a lift truck operator. They gave him the job. When I asked why they told me that he was married and needed the job more than me. This is also why men used to get preference over women. Men were seen as the main "breadwinner" for the family and wives working was an option. Feminism ridiculed homemaking to death and demanded equal hiring laws, which really meant that many men would become deadbeat dads. Later in 1974, when I was working at a speaker factory in the woodshop making cabinets, I was displaced by a woman who complained that there were no women in the cabinet shop. So I was tossed out of that position. I floated from department to department doing fill in work until I was laid off later on that year. It was a year and a half before I found another job. I ended up going back to college and getting a grad degree. But when I went to apply for a small business loan I was flat-out told that being a white male was not a desirable attribute for getting into the program. And it just piled on over the decades.
I had a similar experience when an equally qualified man was give. The promotion because he had a family to maintain. As a man I understood the reason. Made and still makes sense to me.
What's really mind boggling to me is how I'm in a good marriage with a woman who's smart and listens to me, and we're concentrating on how we can make each other happy and better--and then I go out in the world and hear this stuff, and immediately get resentful. It's got to be happening everywhere, and it's obnoxious that it seeps into the relationships that are working. It has to be 100 times harder for someone who doesn't have a decent partner or counterexample in their lives.
I am in a similar situation. I've been happily married to a wonderful man for 20 yrs. And I don't understand these gender wars. I hear women complain and I hear men complain. But men, want women to either change and settle for a man who she feels is not on her level or they become passport bros. Women on the other hand, complain, but they are just saying NO to relationships altogether. Sign of the times.
@@tigre9271some women do have unrealistic standards. I know a 34 year old woman that wants a millionaire bf that over 200 cm tall and is under 25 and has a masters degree and perfectly fit body. And she is still allowed to sleep around and he has to be loyal to her and never talk to other women and let her be in charge of all the money and he’s not allowed to have guy friends or play video games or watch movies with women in them
@tigre9271 No women just have disgustingly overblown demands and standards for some men and are loose whores for most. you have no idea, and cannot comment, on the terrible state of women half your age.
@@markbennett5812 I know both genders have standards. I don't care to get into them because its irrelevant. Some are reasonable and some are unreasonable. It's already been argued about and it continues to be argued about. Some resorting to manipulative tactics and some giving up altogether. I'm actually tired of hearing about the discrepancies. Each person needs to take personal responsibility for themselves and reassess their situation and options. But they need to take time to take a hard, and honest look at themselves instead of blaming others. Blaming others is giving your power to the other person. And you can't rely on the other person to change in order to suit your needs. Nobody wants to work on themselves. Especially their emotional maturity. It's easier to blame the other person. Which not only gets you nowhere, it makes the situation WORSE. No one can see their complaining is futile.
40:00 I was dating a girl in her 12th year of getting her PhD in archeology. She once told me about a published paper about "queer archeology" on the inuit people that was in her own words was only 20% true but NEEDED to be published because it helped disadvantaged have academic credibility. I pointed out that what that paper says is you can't trust anything they published, she said it didn't matter.
The reason why there has traditionally been more "slut shaming" vs. women than men is that this strategy is much more effective to reduce the social loss of children without parents. If you try to convince 100 men to avoid promiscuity and are 90% successful, there will still be 10% of men who ignore that admonition and these 10 men will impregnate all of the 100 (promiscuous) women in the population. If you convince 100 women to avoid promiscuity and are 90% successful, you will only have 10 out of wedlock births to cope with.
This is why I consider misinformation to be harmful. So people who say “as long as I’m not harming anyone” should not be interested in free speech, because free speech assumes the right to harm others with misinformation.
The obsession with victimhood is a manifestation of the corruption of empathy. That is why these pathogenic understandings of social relationships are so tempting to good intending people. They fail to understand or perceive that virtues can be corrupted…that when taken to extremes, can become harms.
As a male Scientist in medical research, it's really disturbing to think that a majority of my female colleagues could potentially be hiding their results that have uncomfortable truths. Chasing the truth is what we swore to do as scientific truth seekers, is it not?
This is a really good conversation. The public theatre of gender relations is dominated by angry people these days, so it is a real pleasure to have two intelligent, articulate, and likable people who evidently like each other engaged in a natural conversation about gender relations. They are often blunt but never polemical. They are sometimes funny. There are some good insights and while their exchange relates particularly to academia, it goes everywhere.
The biggest secret of all is that nobody is honestly surprised when they hear this. If we could all be real, and not fear the wrath of the unflattered female, this information wouldn't even be podcast worthy. Cause we all already know it.
@@derekaarts4997 When you adopted the big lie that men 'oppress women' now or ever. Even in Cairo her experience is likely a result of cultural expectations in which men and women are segregated, and cultural expectations of men taking point to protect women.
@@r.s.4174 - if this era needed breathing room to start, it was the down fall of WW11. when in the course of the war, 50,000,000 men were out of the household and the wives had to look to and for other means to support the remaining in the households. this put a big head on their shoulders. the "woman can do anything a man can do" attitude came about.....but just not go die for their men. when all these men came home, solutions were made and put in place. government subsitites, huge chunks of women joining the work force. took on and over farm fields. picking crops and what not.. the men couldn't just take their womens places in all these positions. so they came home, not needed or nearly as much. time went on where men now not pulling their weight as they use to, in the eyes of their women, making their women take them as a joke and a not needed extra body in the house. this flip flopped the mass of mens roles basically. now we are seeing the full effects of the reversal. reminds me of the fight for human rights for all. that in general everyone and life has the same value, prior to that....everyone outside of a royalty structure, was and could be a slave and or peasant. in terms of the fight, this is what men are finding themselves doing all over again but now, just for their own gender. when we did this together, we learned along the way. what fit and worked best of the role of man and a woman. this can only actually lead to some sort of civil war between the two. and a major over correction will likely happen i bet. where these men battered by society and their own women, turn into humas like mentalities towards women. so if that happens. welp, they brong it on themselves. well with a good deal of democrat party help. a woman declaring her child is not worthy of birth and life, funny enough....wipes out all progress towards human rights that we all made and we be starting over from that stand point. killing their babies is oddly enough, lop sided. wanted boys over girls, in a womans mind, still knowing the boy holds more value in the household. so i expect a ongoing decline of girl babies being born amongst these abortions they performing on mass scale now days. if or when that happens, is likely the generations to fallow of now majority men, will start regaining their position on the hierarchy. might not be a humas like mentality, but i bet not far from it. considering the fact that the men in them coming generations, will eventually pull the majority in political positions and power, will really push society into that direction. on the hole, this is my thoughts. yeah and in words of Dr Evil.. "on the hole, preparation H does feel right" lmao... meaning we, us men of the now and past 2 generations straight are really getting fukt and some hurt butthole ointment is needed lol
@@derekaarts4997 because they successfully infused their people/politics in the positions of power. The "educated" elites have bought into this, and they are the ones effectively cow towing to it. The vast majority of reasonable people are not in positions of direct power and influence, which is why we need to exert more effort to take action against this. It's partly our fault for letting the inmates take over the asylum due to self interest or assumptions that the culture would just keep on going.
This was a very valuable interview for me… I have been listening for several months about the concerns in universities about censorship and silencing voices that are controversial. I couldn’t understand what the shift was. I am a 71 year old woman who went to university in the late 60s and the mid-80s. And the staff was predominantly male. and the focus was finding as much truth as possible… Philosophically and scientifically. It is stunning to realize that since the proportions of male to female in the teaching ranks, as well as the student ranks, has so shifted towards female that focus and thrust of going to university is now agreeableness. Trigger warnings, refusing to invite, controversial speakers, canceling presentations. These were unheard of when I was in university. Part of what was important was the presence of disparate viewpoints and expression. Being around people who you disagree with, but can explain themselves in depth and cogently, is what teaches us to communicate, and to listen, effectively. And currently in this US culture we’re seeing more and more How people no longer know how to listen to one another. Thank you this was very insightful for me.
I've wondered for years if the claims from women about sexism stem from actual sexism or if it's men sniffing out a tendency toward whininess and laziness and steering clear. I think the early feminists understood better than the current crop that to do things associated with men meant you had to take on the toughness of men. Now it seems that women want the male power at their convenience but than hand off the dirty stuff. I went for a natural sciences degree and had three female professors in the area, and perhaps it's hypocritical, but I thought none of them were good at their jobs. I seriously learned more from my male profs. I'm afraid this feelings, feelings, feelings agenda is invading even things like computer science, engineering, and chemistry. I don't think the likes of Elizabeth Blackwell, Marie Curie, and Lise Meitner pushed for this sort of inclusivity. I like being a tomboy, as it helps me be a little more level-headed about certain emotional things.
University, around the turn of the century, say 2000, it was 90% female. The education was ok, but not great in many ways. The whole place was painted a pastey pink.. I put in a complaint against a radical man-hating feminist lecturer...I saw a lot of angles on this topic.. The hypocrisy was massive. It was actually quite damaging to experience it. The politics and lack of proper process. The competitiveness was not fun.. There was one very nice Irish one...a few good ones..but most of them hostile. They gave me more things to rebel against I suppose 😂😂😂 Anyway I could write a book out of it..
This guest isn't nearly as right wing as you seem to believe her to be. Her positions are quite cleanly standard academia gray. Most scientists are center-left/leftist but not in the morphology that right wingers seem to characterize us, and only because most data supports liberal policy. The id pol bullshit that is rampant right now in US politics is not a priority point for most scientists and we can all rather easily engage in nuance with topics that the twitter left sees as taboo.
How about asking: "what provisions were put in place to STOP this bias once parity is reached?'". I've got the slight suspition that the answer is 'none'. Because this is not an objective, it's something else.
They confuse the wider economy's nepotistic milieu with the meritocratic milieu that one finds in academia and sports. Commencement means to begin but a huge number of people never seem to begin.
I have such little respect for most psychology departments across many Universities which are responsible for much of this woke nonsense but this was a good conversation. Cory is switched on and refreshing to watch.
Wokes is distracting us for something bad, the agenda of Evil people are constructing robots, arctificial inteligence, hibrid syntetic human babies, brain chips, milions of smal satelites for orbit planet and block sun light. they hate God and hate that humans with love on heart mind can access God power to use mind to affect reality universe dimensions. aliens ETs and evil humans folow satanic agenda for technology and ignore the organic nature things in planet and in human body mind. so make a new thing that has no conection with laws of life and holy spirit of God, so let stop hate the attackers ideology religion politic etc , are distraction strategy, for us not tell anything for stop agenda of technology self destruction of human kind. 97% DNA is light and sound, 3% protein, but the world system tells is 100% protein only. for we did not discovery our God power of vibration in love for affect reality with mind.
if only that was limited to psychology departments... every single one has been subverted all over the whiter countries. every. single. fucking. one. 🙄
All psychology should be based in the natural sciences and properly constructed experiments, not social science theories. For example, most of Freud's theories were completely debunked by experimental psychology in the 1960s/1970s but they still teach his rubbish to this day.
when the truth is ignored or suppressed b/c it may hurt someone's feelings, everyone loses. That is how we have gotten the entire alphabet movement. Ignoring truth b/c it hurts some people that they are, and always will be the sex they were born as.
Generally speaking it's now the same in Corporate environments as well. The goal to be better and more efficient is being superseded by what is determined to be "Fair". And it's being determined by others who don't have a clue what it entails. Performance and efficiency have traditionally been compensated better. If the slackers on your left and right aren't pulling their weight and are still getting paid the same or better; what motivations do you have to work hard or strive for excellence? Doubly so if they are being paid better simply because they are different gender or race. Growing up in the 80's and 90's, I was always taught that none of that mattered. Now thanks to the DEI nonsense, you are damned if you notice the differences and then still damned if you don't acknowledge the differences. "Everything Burns"
@@shauncalton815 it’s just the case thats what society wants because of feminism . women everywhere take men out of the market and you see this especially in the job market
In other words, another institution where women have invaded men's spaces and turned them into 🐕💩. Now we see the rise of absolutely worthless degrees and the devaluing of higher educ .... sorry indoctrination IE: There were no HR departments until women entered the workforce.
I remember watching a video where a speaker(who was a woman) was describing the differences between men and women and as an example said "Men are generally taller than women" and the crowd booed as if she said the most vile thing imaginable.
It means that most people are literally insane. If you won't believe what you can see with your eyes, how is that not insane? That's like booing for "the sky is blue".
I don't view the past "misogyny" as exploitation so much as infantilization. Men in the past more treated women like children rather than a subclass to be used and exploited. eg the phrase "women and children first" would not have become a thing if men just viewed women as inferior and of less value. Men are instinctually protective of women while they are not instinctually protective of other men. This is something feminism gets very wrong. They're attacking men for being over protective in the modern world, while believing men intend them harm which is not just false but 100% opposite of reality. imo we evolved to be this way because it was necessary in a state of nature for men to play the role of "protector" for the group including if it meant sacrificing their lives for their tribe/family. I also believe this is why women's voices don't change - it was evolutionarily to reinforce the authoritarian role of protector among men back when it made evolutionary sense to do so. This is a deep and complicated topic which imo our western society (especially the english speaking countries) is totally deluded about, and unfortunately this delusion is getting strongly reinforced in academia by people (both men and women) who are giving in to their biases of being protective of women, rather than letting scientific research happen in the areas of gender studies in an unbiased way. At some point in the future there will be a reckoning for this and I believe the (feminist) academics who have been pushing their biases rather than actual unbiased research will not be remembered fondly in the future and there will be a lot of angry men, primarily on the left, when they realize just much modern feminism has transformed from a gender-equality movement to a movement that is mostly focused on (unfair) misandry and gynocentricity.
Interesting comment. There were and are cultures that did not value women. But excluding that, I don't believe it was exploitation either, at least not in western culture, and especially English speaking societies. As for protection this was certainly true in the Middle class (in the British sense) and above, but in the working class it was more difficult for men to protect women, even if that was what they were trying to do. This is the fundamental problem of feminism, it is elitist and only seeks to improve the lives of women of a certain class and above, whilst making life for working class women more difficult.
I also witnessed this destructive feminised takeover of a large UK Universities Psychology/Sociology department in 2001... it was brutal and final in removing ALL men from senior positions! I was forced to abandon my Master's degree directly due to my social psychological academic research and scientific interests! Great interview, Cory is the 'real thing'... much thanks!
"...I also witnessed this destructive feminised takeover of a large UK university psychology/Sociology department..." Add Sweden, Norway, Spain, Germany, Australia, New Zealand and Canada to the list
Wow. Amazing episode. I am unbelievably frustrated with the lack of truth, and straight up male discrimination in society nowadays, and this perfectly helps understand things a little better. Keep at it Cory, you are fantastic, and a very brave woman as well for this. Hopefully Rogan picks you up and gets you on his show, as this needs to seen by as many people as possible.
It’s a well-kept secret, but most women don’t identify as feminists. Just like men, most women simply want fair treatment. If asked to choose between identifying as a feminist or advocating for gender equality, most women would choose the latter.
The more I watch the more satisfied I am with having left my psych degree. It seems that all my shelved research ideas getting to the root of relational aggression would have gotten me ostracized due to inherent differences of aggression in men and women 😅
What's 'relational aggression'? Is it aggressive behaviour between couples in a relationship? And what would these 'inherent differences' be? Predictably, we could posit that men are more aggressive in general and in relationships, and study that. Any research result that produces a 'yes' would be welcomed by academia now.
@@markus717No. That's incorrect. Men and women are most likely equally aggressive. Men however are more likely to enact agression physically ( which is what we are adapted at ). Women enact agression via social and psychological means, reputation destruction. Etc ( Which is what women are adapted at ). Men tend to fix problems. Women try hash out their feelings about problems by talking about them. I'll give you you a few hints from RL. If we take heterosexual relations as having the average rates of violence in relations. Then relations between 2 homosexual men have *lower* rates of violence. And women in homosexual relations have a *higher* rate of violence in their relationships. Do you think that is by accident? Is the Metoo movement particularly dangerous to be handed over to empower women ?
The truth is men are more bold about agressions in public while women are more selective about agressions and abuse, mainly in more isolated spaces / domestic. Despite what statistics say they don't take into account unreported domestic violence on men otherwise I would bet a million dollars that real statistics would show a higher percentage of DV perpetrated on men.
Honestly I enjoy psychology and studying human nature and animals themselves but by being a certified psychologist I would be doing more harm than good to male clients as I will be expected to demonize everyone including myself for being born with a penis. This is why therapy, couples counceling and such is pointless for men and why they will not go to them unless strongarmed into doing so. Women simply can get away with violence and abuse and men cannot defend themselves. They are still good at controlling their violence in public better than men.
@@dwwolf4636 There's a fair amount of research showing that in relationships that feature reciprocal DV, the female partner is the one who initiates physical violence about 70% of the time on average. This also links to data showing that lesbian relationships have the highest rates of physical violence. I think that for a lot of women, talking about their problems is less about understanding their feelings than it's a way to get validation for their feelings and behaviour. Also, if you're the friend who says something like "Actually in this situation I think you were in the wrong...", you'll find that a man will be far more likely to react in a calm and reasonable way and take your advice on board, whereas a woman is fairly likely to react angrily and dismiss any criticism out of hand.
Here is my updated and improved version of G. Michael Hopf's original insight: 1. Hard times create strong men. 2. Strong men create good times. 3. Good times create weak men. 4. Weak men create radical women. 5. Radical women create hard times.
@@toomuchinformationAbsolutely not. They are inescapable, but few things are integral to science. Science is all about proving yourself wrong, politics is all about proving you're right.
@@toomuchinformation LMAO! Politics have 0 to do with science. Nothing in the scientific method says you need politics to prove a theory. What a brainlet take! 🤣
Shes on point about academia and whats happening to it. However, I believe what she described as egalitarian vs hierarchy was wrong. Men are perfectly egalitarian, you can try anything you want, but you should end doing what youre best at. What she was describing for the women was equitarian, where anyone can do anything regardless of how good at it they are. That doesnt emd well.
The reason men are not "slut shamed" the same as women has to do with the varying levels of difficulty. For a woman to be promiscuous is not difficult, even woman that are not seen as attractive can have many sexual partners. For a man to have many sexual partners a man has to be successful,charming,physically fit, so it is more difficult for a man to achieve the same result.
It’s the old analogy; what do you call a key that opens many locks? A master key. What do you call a lock that can be opened by any key? A garbage lock.
Because women dont want to live in reality. If you tell them the truth, they get upset so everyone lies to them and then they vote based on those lies.
The is probably the best video Chris Williamson has come out with. This entire video not only validates my lived experiences but also my pondered conclusions too. I feel sane again! Cory is also an absolute gem! Thanks to her for enduring criticism and standing up for the true nature of science and empiricism Here's to the truth ALWAYS being prioritised first!!!!
Wokes is distracting us for something bad, the agenda of Evil people are constructing robots, arctificial inteligence, hibrid syntetic human babies, brain chips, milions of smal satelites for orbit planet and block sun light. they hate God and hate that humans with love on heart mind can access God power to use mind to affect reality universe dimensions. aliens ETs and evil humans folow satanic agenda for technology and ignore the organic nature things in planet and in human body mind. so make a new thing that has no conection with laws of life and holy spirit of God, so let stop hate the attackers ideology religion politic etc , are distraction strategy, for us not tell anything for stop agenda of technology self destruction of human kind. 97% DNA is light and sound, 3% protein, but the world system tells is 100% protein only. for we did not discovery our God power of vibration in love for affect reality with mind.
So true, during the recession in 2009 I was let go from my job. It was between myself and a newer female hire. She was awesome, super capable and lovely. Though I had more tactile experience at the time it did not matter. The culture had shifted significantly and the company made the right decision. She eventually became VP of the company. I lost everything. Two very important realizations happened for me during this time. If I wanted any kind of future I would have to work a thousand times harder than anyone else, male or female, even if I owned my own company. If men have had any inherent advantage in the past, those days are long gone. We are simply back to what we have always been, expendable workers and cannon fodder. I don't despair because the constant reminder to stay on my toes has been invaluable and the experience has strengthened my faith in God. I tell any young man who will listen to pursue excellence above all else because that will give you the only advantage you will ever have. And maybe this reality is for the best. Thank you for the excellent content Chris.
I understand what you’re saying, I just don’t see anything good ultimately in living in delusion. Truth may hurt but it is the most important thing for surviving in reality
I had a very difficult time finding a (good) job throughout the 2010s, but I know if I was a woman (or black) I would have easily been hired with my qualifications. Yet I'm supposed to believe this is a patriarchy and I have all the privilege and women are basically slaves who are finally breaking the chains. It's that gaslighting that bothers me more. If you want to take over, create a matriarchy, fine, go for it, make that power play, but don't pretend you're the victim. Be upfront, say what you mean, have some honor.
While I agree that young men should pursue excellence, a society should provide those that perform their tasks with enough incentives to continue doing that and guarantee long term stability. Not everyone can achieve the same things and as the demands start increasing, a lot of people will not be able to experience enough success to remain invested in society. So a certain amount of fairness is necessary to make sure a large enough amount of people can have some success.
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:00 🚺 Dr. Clark discusses pervasive misogyny, questioning its validity in modern Western societies. 00:18 🌍 Personal experience in Cairo highlights societal differences in gender treatment. 00:33 🇺🇸 Contrast of gender biases in the U.S. compared to other parts of the world. 00:47 📝 Mention of a paper reviewing recent research on gender biases. 01:00 ⚖️ Discussion on biases favoring women over men in various domains. 01:14 🔬 Bias against scientific findings that portray men more favorably than women. 01:28 🤔 Theory on societal concern for women possibly stemming from caring more about women than men. 01:57 ❓ Difficulty in measuring societal biases against men and women. 02:24 🏫 Exploration of potential biases in academia. 02:52 🔄 Shift in biases favoring women since around 2009. 03:33 💭 Discussion on biases in favor of women and lack of attention to biases against men. 04:29 🧠 Studies showing preference for findings that women are more intelligent than men. 04:58 📰 Media focus on anti-female biases despite evidence of pro-female biases. 05:25 📚 Explanation for mainstream narratives focusing on potential harm to women. 06:06 🧬 Discussion on evolutionary value of women and its influence on societal concerns. 06:49 🕒 Contextualization of biases across different cultures and times. 07:03 🔄 Cultural narrative contributing to overcorrection in addressing gender disparities. 07:31 🗞️ Concept of gamma bias in media reporting. 08:11 💬 Impact of media portrayal on public perception of gender-related issues. 08:50 📈 Discussion on the increasing number of female CEOs and societal implications. 09:02 🧪 Examination of biases within psychology academia. 09:57 🔍 The influence of academia on public understanding and interpretation of gender biases. 10:26 🧐 Exploration of the reasons behind the interpretation that the world is sexist against women. 11:22 💡 Insight into how women's increasing power in institutions can focus attention on their interests. 12:19 🚺 Misconceptions about discrimination against women in male-dominated fields. 12:58 📢 Influence of media and academia on public narratives about gender disparities. 13:25 🏢 Discussion on the lack of public recognition for male achievements compared to female ones. 14:34 🤷 Discussion on why women might have misandrous tendencies or biases. 15:29 🔍 Analysis of the disparity in academic and public concern for misogyny vs. misandry. 16:12 💪 Examination of societal denial of physical differences between men and women. 17:34 🧠 Gender differences in cognitive tasks and societal implications. 18:51 📊 Analysis of the changing gender dynamics in higher education and its impact on academic culture. 20:01 🚹 Exploration of how increasing female presence in academia affects research and teaching approaches. 21:12 🤝 Discussion on the gender differences in prioritizing scientific truth versus moral concerns. 22:36 🏆 Exploration of gender differences in attitudes towards competition and achievement in academia. 23:17 🧬 Analysis of evolutionary influences on gender differences in societal roles and behaviors. 24:54 🏀 Examination of gender differences in sports team dynamics and competitiveness. 25:36 💪 Discussion on physical vulnerability influencing women's social strategies. 26:15 🧠 Analysis of psychological differences between men and women affecting societal priorities. 28:09 📈 Exploration of gender differences in academic values and their impact on scientific goals. 29:06 🏫 Statistical analysis of gender differences in attitudes towards academic freedom and controversial topics. 29:48 🤔 Discussion on the fundamental differences in scientific motivation between men and women. 31:56 🔄 Analysis of changing cultural narratives about women and their impact on academia and society. 33:33 🧠 Exploration of the challenge in justifying the pursuit of scientific truth over moral concerns. 34:57 💡 Discussion on the importance of pursuing empirical truth in science for accurate societal decision-making. 36:35 📚 Analysis of the potential harm caused by suppressing scientific findings. 38:00 📉 Examination of the consequences of ignoring scientific evidence for the sake of social concerns. 39:09 🚫 Discussion on the impact of censoring scientific research on women's advancement. 39:23 ⚽ Analysis of the performance differences between professional male and female sports teams. 40:05 🧠 Exploration of cognitive differences between men and women in specific tasks. 41:02 📊 Discussion on the representation of men and women in higher education Made with HARPA AI
In Dutch we have the expression "Soft healers make for stinking wounds" meaning that if you don't want to make the optimal but difficult choice to prevent the hurt caused by that choice the end result could be worse. A surgeon that refuses to amputate a badly wounded and infected limb because he/she feels sad for that patient having to go through life without that limb runs the very real risk that patient will no longer have a life to live. Men will cut off that limb without a second thought, women not so much. Society - including science - is rapidly going down the drain because women have gained too much power and are not willing to make the difficult decisions in order to prevent perceived harm without eye for the possible benefits.
Kan je me alsjeblieft zeggen hoe je dat in het Nederlands zegt? ""Soft healers make for stinking wounds" "ik leer altijd graag nieuwe Nederlandse uitdrukkingen. Bedankt!
if you really believe this is a man woman thing you are not so bright. this is orchestrated. by whom does not matter. it is simply there to create division and confusion so others can capitalize on said state of affairs.
Wokes is distracting us for something bad, the agenda of Evil people are constructing robots, arctificial inteligence, hibrid syntetic human babies, brain chips, milions of smal satelites for orbit planet and block sun light. they hate God and hate that humans with love on heart mind can access God power to use mind to affect reality universe dimensions. aliens ETs and evil humans folow satanic agenda for technology and ignore the organic nature things in planet and in human body mind. so make a new thing that has no conection with laws of life and holy spirit of God, so let stop hate the attackers ideology religion politic etc , are distraction strategy, for us not tell anything for stop agenda of technology self destruction of human kind. 97% DNA is light and sound, 3% protein, but the world system tells is 100% protein only. for we did not discovery our God power of vibration in love for affect reality with mind.
"Morality is cowardice." -Neitzsche “What he meant by that was that, most of what people claim to be moral virtue, is merely their fear to do anything that they would actually like to do that society would deem inappropriate.” - Jordan Peterson
FWIW how I'd push back against "men and women are psychologically different because of patriarchy and social expectations" would be "or patriarchy and social expectations arose from the psychological differences between men and women". I think you'll find it to be true (if only you look) that "staying home and raising a family" will be the most satisfying life work for somewhere between 75 & 90% of women. Even Stevie Nicks says she feels like she missed something important. 43:00
Chris the wide majority of us Blacks do not use that definition of racism: power+ privilege. That was created by the same academics starting around 2009, like you guys mentioned. I'm 33 and I didn't hear that definition until after I graduated college.
While I agree with you that a majority of blacks don't use that definition I heard this way before 2009. If you know pro black crowds this has always been their definition. They would call most other transgressions prejudice
Women have better side vision and are mire observant than men,Thus they are better at browsing and shopping And spotting predators which could harm young. Men are better at forward vision good for hunting targeting weapons.
The apalling article inScientific American mag saying sexis a spectrum . Is very shocking. For TRUE Science see THE PARADOX ISTITUTE ON SEX/BIOLOGY. THIS IS A FUNDAMENTAL ATTACK ON HUMAN BIOLOGY AND SCIENCE.
Your program and your guests keep getting better and better. It's awesome how you go fearlessly after our most difficult social problems with a sense of humor and without ever seeming to have an axe to grind. Keep up the good work!
Wokes is distracting us for something bad, the agenda of Evil people are constructing robots, arctificial inteligence, hibrid syntetic human babies, brain chips, milions of smal satelites for orbit planet and block sun light. they hate God and hate that humans with love on heart mind can access God power to use mind to affect reality universe dimensions. aliens ETs and evil humans folow satanic agenda for technology and ignore the organic nature things in planet and in human body mind. so make a new thing that has no conection with laws of life and holy spirit of God, so let stop hate the attackers ideology religion politic etc , are distraction strategy, for us not tell anything for stop agenda of technology self destruction of human kind. 97% DNA is light and sound, 3% protein, but the world system tells is 100% protein only. for we did not discovery our God power of vibration in love for affect reality with mind.
Wokes is distracting us for something bad, the agenda of Evil people are constructing robots, arctificial inteligence, hibrid syntetic human babies, brain chips, milions of smal satelites for orbit planet and block sun light. they hate God and hate that humans with love on heart mind can access God power to use mind to affect reality universe dimensions. aliens ETs and evil humans folow satanic agenda for technology and ignore the organic nature things in planet and in human body mind. so make a new thing that has no conection with laws of life and holy spirit of God, so let stop hate the attackers ideology religion politic etc , are distraction strategy, for us not tell anything for stop agenda of technology self destruction of human kind. 97% DNA is light and sound, 3% protein, but the world system tells is 100% protein only. for we did not discovery our God power of vibration in love for affect reality with mind.
Hi Chris, I wanted to suggest having Charles Wheelan on your podcast. I'm reading his book "Naked Statistics" and it's been a game-changer for me. It's made me way better at thinking logically and opened my eyes to how much our world runs on data. Now, I see things in a whole new light. I'm always thinking about the numbers behind smart decisions people make. And I've gotten really good at spotting and avoiding tricky statistical mistakes. Strangely, I haven't found any good interviews with Wheelan out there. That's where you could come in. You're great at what you do, and I think you could showcase his genius. Plus, the book is funny too, which is a nice bonus. Looking forward to hearing more from you.
Wokes is distracting us for something bad, the agenda of Evil people are constructing robots, arctificial inteligence, hibrid syntetic human babies, brain chips, milions of smal satelites for orbit planet and block sun light. they hate God and hate that humans with love on heart mind can access God power to use mind to affect reality universe dimensions. aliens ETs and evil humans folow satanic agenda for technology and ignore the organic nature things in planet and in human body mind. so make a new thing that has no conection with laws of life and holy spirit of God, so let stop hate the attackers ideology religion politic etc , are distraction strategy, for us not tell anything for stop agenda of technology self destruction of human kind. 97% DNA is light and sound, 3% protein, but the world system tells is 100% protein only. for we did not discovery our God power of vibration in love for affect reality with mind.
I must live on another planet. Can't go anywhere with my wife until she has done a full-house search for her cellphone, keys and sunglasses. Stereotypes must exist for some reason, but I see so many exceptions I have to wonder what that reason might be?
What a wonderful presentation. I’ve been an adjunct professor of psychology for 30 years. I have seen academia and the clinical professions become increasingly feminized, Jordan Peterson has addressed male and female personality differences much more eloquently that I can. We are now seeing this come to fruition.
@@poocrayon4588 men have moved on. Now the women, will, too, because they won't have mates in college. Then all these idiot ideological brainwashing stations will either adapt or die. Can't wait, it should be soon.
@@counselorguy5481 if you must know. My adjunct status was related to military moves every 3 to 4 years. I’m a practicing clinician who was blessed to be offered part-time faculty positions at every location that I was stationed, undergraduate as well as graduate teaching.
I absolutely loved this interview. I've never heard a more clear and concise description of what is going on in the world today. This is very refreshing. They managed to eloquently bring up the topics that we all need to hear. And they kept it lighthearted and easy to take in. This is why I'm a constant fan of Chris Williamson, and now I'm a fan of Cory. This has been truly appreciated.
Concerning truth, I recently rewatched an episode of _Star Trek: The Next Generation_ ("Rightful Heir") that handled it really well. I'll try to describe it as briefly as possible: one character, Liutenant Worf, discovers that a person he thought was the second coming of a legendary hero to the klingons was actually just a clone. First, he is asked to keep this secret from the current klingon leader, but decides to tell him the truth. Then, while discussing the threat of a civil war between two factions - between those loyal to the current leader and those who would follow the legendary figure -, Worf comes with a compromising solution: to go public about the clone, with complete honesty about it, so that he (the clone) could be seen not as a second coming, but as a rightful heir to the old hero, allowing him to become an emperor - but with the current leader retaining all the actual power. In other words, the episode revolves around the temptations of going along with a lie for supposedly good reasons, but Worf finds the best solution for everyone through standing firmly on the side of truth at every step. A really good message, well delivered.
Wokes is distracting us for something bad, the agenda of Evil people are constructing robots, arctificial inteligence, hibrid syntetic human babies, brain chips, milions of smal satelites for orbit planet and block sun light. they hate God and hate that humans with love on heart mind can access God power to use mind to affect reality universe dimensions. aliens ETs and evil humans folow satanic agenda for technology and ignore the organic nature things in planet and in human body mind. so make a new thing that has no conection with laws of life and holy spirit of God, so let stop hate the attackers ideology religion politic etc , are distraction strategy, for us not tell anything for stop agenda of technology self destruction of human kind. 97% DNA is light and sound, 3% protein, but the world system tells is 100% protein only. for we did not discovery our God power of vibration in love for affect reality with mind.
Far too much of my politics was refined through TNG and DS9 lol, DS9 was so good at making the shallow stereotypes very fleshed out and deep. Quark calling out the federations smug superior complex is still one of my favourite lines. There's another TNG episode that I cannot ever remember the name of, that has a civilization that just replaces one race oppressing another every few hundred years, Which feels awfully relevant these days with concepts like collective white guilt or racial justice. There was a leader even explicitly claiming the other race *deserved* to be punished for the sins of their race.
Cool video, My relationship of 5 years ended a month ago. The love of my life decided to leave me, I really love her so much I can’t stop thinking about her, I’ve tried my very best to get her back in my life, but to no avail, I’m frustrated, I don’t see my life with anyone else. I’ve done my best to get rid of the thoughts of her, but I can’t, I don’t know why I’m saying this here, I really miss her and just can’t stop thinking about her.
unfortunately my friend, once a woman has gone, it's over. There is nothing you can do to get her back. The only thing you can do is choose how you react. Hit the gym, hit work with double enthusiasm. Level up your skillset, work hard, be the best version of yourself.
You wont get her back by being needy. I know it's hard mate but give yourself say 6 months single. Absence can make the heart grow fonder but it is still possible she would have fully moved on by then....or not. Without the benefit of hearing both sides of why the relationship broke down I can't say much else except do more things that focus on YOU rather than her and if you still have any of her stuff at your place then box it up temporarily to remove any chance that you will be reminded on the days that you AREN'T thinking about her for a short time. That includes digital photos. Store them on an external HD and if things workout between you two later on then you can always retrieve them. Goodluck!
OK, let's talk about academic culture. In 1977, I ran a number of random correlates as part of a social science research class at Syracuse. Random correlates. One hit pay dirt, and my professor got very excited. He wanted me to publish, and instructed me to "make up and explanation". It has only gotten exponentially worse. Regarding forbidden topics? The Leftist takeover of the mental health professions is now complete. #1. You may not suggest that children being mutilated is anything but "care". As a therapist, you can now lose your license for suggesting that kids grow out of gender dysphoria. They do. #2. You may not suggest that perennially claiming to be a victim is unhealthy. #3. You may not suggest that racism against white people, Jews, or Asians is racism. #4. You may not suggest that freedom of speech is a higher value than "not being offended". #5. You may not suggest that viewpoint diversity should be a part of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and God Forbid, should you point out that merit matters. Those are my five. Great discussion nonetheless.
"So a lot of the biases that used to favor men now favor women, and a lot of the biases that always favored women still favor women." Dr. Robert Briffault spoke on this in his 1931 book, The Mothers: The Matriarchal Theory of Social Origins which I quoted on my channel, in stating that it is only when women have a position of leverage that you see such rebellious behavior.
This conversation is gold. Not only for it's content, which would be enough, but also for the mutual respect, benelovense, the chemistry between them.. Will recommend to a friend, will view again. And subscibed, of course.
The class thing in the UK is so real. I was always taught to talk correctly because my parents knew if I spoke with a strong accent I would find it hard to get a job. I can turn the accent on and off depending on who I'm with and what I'm doing. When I'm with friends, I'll use Geordie slang a lot, but when I'm working or speaking to someone from a different country or region, I drop the slang and speak proper English. I grew up working class, but I'm often called posh because of my accent.
In the states we have a similar experience, inner city ebonics and strong country (especially southern country or mountain) accents can be a serious social networking and career/business limiter, but in particular circumstances, like asking for directions or other help from another lower class person it's helpful to switch your accent back on.
The academics are chalk full of the gatekeeping and self interest people that can effect others being stone walled in funds of your research and your work getting published. Last couple years its been well understood that if you want to get published in order to get funding, you acquiesce to the liberal hiveminds. Guess how that's been working out.
I worked for the federal government for forty years, retiring in 2016. Women were so disadvantaged that whenever a colleague would tell me of a new high level hire I would ask, "What's her name?" It was all women, all the time.
Great interview. It's telling that this academic is the one who "can" do this research. JBP has been talking about this for years, and he is persona non grata in academia, despite a stellar career in research, teaching and as a practicing psychologist. All the better if more people start dealing with this. Cheers.
Wokes is distracting us for something bad, the agenda of Evil people are constructing robots, arctificial inteligence, hibrid syntetic human babies, brain chips, milions of smal satelites for orbit planet and block sun light. they hate God and hate that humans with love on heart mind can access God power to use mind to affect reality universe dimensions. aliens ETs and evil humans folow satanic agenda for technology and ignore the organic nature things in planet and in human body mind. so make a new thing that has no conection with laws of life and holy spirit of God, so let stop hate the attackers ideology religion politic etc , are distraction strategy, for us not tell anything for stop agenda of technology self destruction of human kind. 97% DNA is light and sound, 3% protein, but the world system tells is 100% protein only. for we did not discovery our God power of vibration in love for affect reality with mind.
Wokes is distracting us for something bad, the agenda of Evil people are constructing robots, arctificial inteligence, hibrid syntetic human babies, brain chips, milions of smal satelites for orbit planet and block sun light. they hate God and hate that humans with love on heart mind can access God power to use mind to affect reality universe dimensions. aliens ETs and evil humans folow satanic agenda for technology and ignore the organic nature things in planet and in human body mind. so make a new thing that has no conection with laws of life and holy spirit of God, so let stop hate the attackers ideology religion politic etc , are distraction strategy, for us not tell anything for stop agenda of technology self destruction of human kind. 97% DNA is light and sound, 3% protein, but the world system tells is 100% protein only. for we did not discovery our God power of vibration in love for affect reality with mind.
How could we possibly think that protecting people's feelings is more important than the pursuit of truth? 😅 I think one of the main purposes of life is the pursuit of truth!
There is also the argument that I've heard from Jordan Peterson that this female primacy of care is valid and necessary for the first few years of our lives, but AFTER that period can quickly become toxic, if it isn't reigned in enough by a primacy on individual challenge and boundary-setting. The demonization of the male has unleashed the dark mother on our entire culture.
Great video Chris, and Cory. Thank you for having this conversation publicly. This is terrifying! It sounds like the questions of science, and academia have to be answered with the same delicacy as "Do I look fat in these pants?" We are well, and truly fucked if it does continue in this direction (as all indicators seem to show it will)
People like Dr. Cory Clark actually give me some hope that all is not lost. I've also noticed that Chris has a real knack for finding and interviewing amazing, intelligent, beautiful and engaging women- NOT a criticism, I'm just jealous! I could talk to Dr. Cory or Louise Perry for hours, they're just that fascinating and enchanting!
So, I'm curious, why does beauty matter when women speak, but not men? And why do you think that might be an issue of why there are a lot of fights with women and men in workplaces when a completely arbitrary value for practicality is counted for one side over the other.
I saw some news articles a few years ago that celebrated the results of research studies showing that women had caught up to men in IQ measurements even though the measurements had shown IQ had dropped across the board.
Like the American, Australian and Canadian research in the 90's that identified 70% of abusers are women, that disappeared under the campus rug. Or that 80's research that after redefining domestic violence to include yelling proclaimed children from "domestic violence" environments were deemed to be at risk of the father. There were a lot of women who played that card in the family court and not only gained custody of their children but were able to block access and in many many cases poisoned the relationships. Millions of children throughout the west grew up fatherless. Even today 40 years later between 50 and 60% of young men in our maximum security prisons were raised without a substantive male in their lives. How many father's took their own lives because of the loss of their children's love. It was 22 years later that this academics paper was reviewed by a student and the major flaws were highlighted. The study was again undertaken and the conclusion was that children other than in exceptional circumstances were not at risk. Efforts to correct the lie have delivered few fair results for men, especially for men who blindly walk back in to an abusive relationship on the belief as conveyed to them by society it was all their fault. The price when influential people are able to create a social construct on campus by simply changing the meaning of a word then turn it on society. Haven't we ignored that piece of repeating history long enough? The 5% do not equste to the whole ! Even today there are many fabricated social constructs that people cannot see and you won't because speech that effects perception is now controlled by nothing more than controlled silence. For the abuse buffs that's called Invalidation.
Most custody is settled out of court and in the majority both parties mutually agree that the children should stay with the mother. Most men don't want to look after their kids. If in the marriage the woman does all of the childcare, why wouldn't she in the divorce?
@@wyleecoyotee4252 Yeah but that's a slanted result from the get go. Why would men bother even pushing for 50/50 custody if all the results of the courts overwhelming favor women. Most lawyers advise men to NOT go to court for exactly that reason. If it was simply just childcare you'd have a point but the issue is the child support that gets allocated relative to the mans income. You'll have a family and the cost of kids will be a few hundred bucks a month for food and upkeep but then the divorce happens and all of a sudden the guy whos making 100k a year, now has to pay 30k+ in child support and there's no auditing process for how any of the money is spent. If there's any shot for a guy to be able to just hand over some money and buy the kids stuff they need, instead of the court setting that (they take a cut) then it will nearly always be the preferred option.
Its fascinating to me (under this new order of gender sameness) that men will literally go to war or fight criminals on the street without many people paying much attention to their oppression or asking where the equal-in-capacity women are to help them.
Or the inequality of most really tough jobs. Look at the workers doing hard work and it's mostly men. How come feminists aren't talking about this form of inequality?
@@markbennett5812 Since we don't conscript in the US - joining is on a volunteer basis, all I can cleave from those numbers is that men like war more than most women? But, if we had a draft for any reason in the future, I do think we need to revisit the rules on who is drafted - as I don't think gender should be a factor, but other factors should be considered regardless of whether the draftee is male or female.
This was such an insightful and eye opening discussion. In a previous job i ran a large team with a very diverse mix of people (women/men/cultural backgrounds). While in the role i spent so much time having to be the mediator and definitely looking back i never realized how much of the mediation was being required because of men vs women way of thinking. Amazing insight.
I was in a relationship several years ago. She slapped me really hard on my arm when we were in public. I ended that 4 year relationship in 10 seconds. No person male or female should take abuse.
Sadly it's the "narcissistic mother" - "the mother" more self-centered and concerned with their own virtue signaling than with anything related to the "truth" of things.
Facts over feelings. It's terrifying that good scientific data will be overlooked because of who it may "harm", especially when that harm may not even exist but in someone's mind... I hope more scientists, scholars, and people in general will gain the courage to speak up on what is real rather than what is PC. I hope that the public will stop pushing agendas that only further divide themselves. Good things happen when people work together, promote civil discourse !
That is more common in soft sciences like psychology. In stem hard sciences, women are there because they are nerds. None of us are studying protein structure to “save the world”, we do it because it’s cool and that’s it.
Calling a bit of science "harm", because it might be a bit shocking to some uptight 18y/o sensibilities, is so degrading to people who have to deal with real psychological harm, like victims of sex trafficking, veterans with PTSD.
Excellent interview, excellent guest. Makes me think of all the things JP has been saying about the state of modern academia and the ways in which women/lefitsts have the institutions by the short and curlies
Wokes is distracting us for something bad, the agenda of Evil people are constructing robots, arctificial inteligence, hibrid syntetic human babies, brain chips, milions of smal satelites for orbit planet and block sun light. they hate God and hate that humans with love on heart mind can access God power to use mind to affect reality universe dimensions. aliens ETs and evil humans folow satanic agenda for technology and ignore the organic nature things in planet and in human body mind. so make a new thing that has no conection with laws of life and holy spirit of God, so let stop hate the attackers ideology religion politic etc , are distraction strategy, for us not tell anything for stop agenda of technology self destruction of human kind. 97% DNA is light and sound, 3% protein, but the world system tells is 100% protein only. for we did not discovery our God power of vibration in love for affect reality with mind.
I know a lot of the information discussed here was about men vs women, and that may in fact be crucial, but if you just read Intellectuals and Society by Thomas Sowell (and I have heard he says the same things in The Vision of the Annointed and The Quest for Cosmic Justice), many of the points you two are emphasizing are elucidated very clearly. Specifically, the point about the fact that if the wellbeing of the disadvantaged were truly the main concern of those who share the anointed vision (wokeism and proto wokeism), then their main activity would be trying to ascertain what helps the downtrodden, and first and foremost, they would find that markets and commerce help the poor of all countries across the world, but they don't look into it at all empirically. The main historical proponents of the vision of the anointed have all been men going back to the late 17th century, but that's because only men wrote like that back then. This vision began taking over large swathes of American legal thought on federal court decisions starting in the 1920s and 30s, and it was still all men back then. The women thing may speed it up, but they have been on the rise for a very long time now.
The bias in psychology research explains a lot on why I can't find much on relational aggression and female bullying. I think it's something that deserves more attention. I have a hypothesis that majority of women sabotage each other through gossip and reputation damage because of how social media has driven us to compete. But, because it isn't obvious, it doesn't get the attention it deserves. It's like feminism has unlocked an era of entitled mean girls who avoid accountability by feigning innocence and acting oppressed.
Why do you feel the need to bring in feminism into this? You think that before women got rights to vote this same problem did not exist...? Because it most certaintly did, men also used gossip and rumours in high society to "bring down" opponents, of course men had other weapons, women had only that.
It was a fellow female who was my chief tormentor for years in late elementary and junior high; I never had any problems with the boys. You are very much on to something.
I could see she was trying to steer him to say "avoid harm" but as a guy I could also see that "the sports called Science is about exactitude and distinguishing correct from incorrect".
What's really interesting is that women have a tendency of focusing on inductive reasoning and experience. This means that they have a larger base of common-sense about the environments that they are currently within. Whereas men focus more on deductive reasoning, which acts as a "true function" which allows for an accurate understanding of the world. Long stories oversimplify, women are good at determining the most valuable (cost/benefit) environments to be in, and men tend to analyze and alter so that they can make environments more valuable (less cost/more benefit). Effectively this means that women help induce survival for our species, and men help induced thriving for our species. Donald Hoffman's theorem on "fitness beats truth" demonstrates that a little bit of delusion is actually more beneficial for a species to survive, than a strict adherence to the truth. I suspect that we as a species are sexually dimorphic (men and women are different) in order to allow us to *survive* and *thrive,* when working in harmony together. The protection from harm is a threshold issue. Knowing the truth is actually less beneficial in general. But, for specific cases that are above a generalized threshold, the truth becomes more vital. It's a lot like... Perfection being the enemy of good. Generalized information, common sense, that would be good enough for everyday survival. And perfect would be the fundamental truth of the world. Common Sense covers the general, and Truth covers the abnormal and extraneous things. It's the good enough versus the 12-page analyzation. 1.) Women take a good enough, how is everyone feeling today? kind of attitude. 2.) Whereas men tend towards a methodical and detailed 12-page explanation on the ins-and-outs of how that is done properly... And when done properly the steps to take to properly finish, if environmental properties elicit a blah blah blah blah blah.....
Saw some studies of why very few women are conservative in their views when it comes to voting. This is playing out some of those reasons. Very interesting. We're a lot of men are more interested in freedom at any cost.
I have two STEM graduate degrees and am a published scientist (biology and engineering). I was raised to have analytical conversations at the dinner table and was always purely naturally curious about observing science and nature. I devoured books on weather and wrote my own picture guide book on cloud species in middle school, observed and identified the protists in the water in my mom's potted plants in a microscope, and desperately built things that could fly (kites, planes, parachutes) around my neighborhood. I explored being a human intellect and experience with pure humility and curiosity, which was, quite characteristically, not engendered, but ultimately human. In fact, I remember how the silliness of the societal guy/girl thing in middle school starting and how boring it was! I always had a strong rebellious propensity to trust myself in the amidst the crowd and I'm glad a stuck with my passion.
I hear you. The point of all our progress is to allow people to be what they’re best at and love and quit telling people they have to be this or that. Not saying anyone is what they clearly aren’t.
@@realistic_delinquent Can you please tell me more about what you mean by this? I mostly agree with Jordan but he is flawed as well. I'm just curious of what you think and where this comes from. I'm not trying to argue with you, btw. I'm only asking to understand. :)
I live in New Zealand. We have Maori and also Pacific Island groups. They do not do as well in society as the Indians and the Asians. I was thinking about this and I am of the belief that different cultures exhibit different traits. The Asian and Indian groups know the real value of money and saving, and investing, and investing in their childrens education and the importance of a cohesive family unit. I am sure this is why the Indian and Asian groups are much more sucessful in our western society.
I was reminded when she was talking about so many of the Uni progressives being upper class, well educated white women, of the punk scene back in the 70’s, 80’s and 90’s. An overwhelming majority of the American punk groups came from Orange County California. Which is a super well to do area of America. Something to think on.
The thing about this trend in academia (if you can even still call it that) is that it promotes and creates total dysfunction of the subject (any subject) it infects. The discipline of history has been being affected for perhaps the longest because it was an avenue to attack for getting women more control of academia to begin with.
Dr Clark is the ultimate interview subject. She is incredibly smart, well informed, quick thinking, cheerful, funny, relaxed, a great conversationalist, thoughtful and a lovely person. amazingly great ! This was an excellent UA-cam. I learned quite a lot.
This was soooo good. Wow you two. I really appreciate what guy said here around 45 min in about the equalization of the sexes hurting women. I'm 40 & I've watched it decline slowly my whole adult life. It almost reversed too much. Like if you are abused, you must have deserved it. It's definitely had a horrible impact & it's something I've thought or talked about many times. Like if things had happened a decade or 2 earlier how differently it would have been. I see a shift so much to the opposite a lot of popular people even, act as if there are no abused women & they're all lying & all men are great. Only women mess them up... It's like the twilight zone. Am I the only one hearing this stuff more & more? All the one sex is all good and one is all bad. It's like this is how victims (real ones) stay victims. It really needs to be course correctly strongly. We're a lost society. I see men defending the worst of women if they defend anyone. Take for example that woman on the American Airlines flight. Actual crazy women who PRETEND to be victims get the help or defense. But real victims? Pfft you deserved it (when you never once did). I feel like I should be 80 or 90 to see society change SO much in SUCH a short time. Imo everything really changed quicker after Obama was elected. I voted for him twice. He did promise change. Anyway, thanks for doing this. Really much needed. Wondering if you have some like this on psychopaths & sociopaths. Subbed!
I haven't finished watching yet. I've liked most of what Cory has said, however, as a woman who worked as a Sessional Academic for a School of Psychology in a university, I had no problem with giving undergraduate students low marks or failing them, but the marking criterias were designed to pass everyone. They had to write complete gibberish for us to be able to fail them. I was even asked to remark some assignments because my average mark was too low. The marking criterias were designed by men too. Edit: I'm also egalitarian, so if you do equally as well as another student on the assignment, you should get the same high grade. But if your assignment was rubbish, I don't think you should get the same high grade just because you submitted the assignment. I think there are different definitions of egalitarianism, and believing that all people deserve equal treatment doesn't mean that you feel that a criminal should enjoy the freedom of an innocent person, for example. It means that two people who commit the same crime should receive the same sentence, regardless of class, gender, race, etc. Coming back to the university and assignment marks example, universities are not really designed for teaching people. They're businesses, and there's an incentive to pass students and get them through degrees so that the university continues to get money out of them. Individual academics can be very caring people and actually care about their students, but they get pressured by the higher ups to implement things that they don't necessarily want to. I know this whole episode was on more than just this point, but I just wanted to add my two cents about it. Oh, and other female Sessionals also wanted to fail students hahah. To be clear, the quality of students' work is pretty bad.
My partner liked it, but we only needed him to do it for a few years until they got into school. After that he worked part time for few years while they were in school, so he could be out of work in time to pick them up from school. He also trained for MMA at the time and had a few fights. At the time, I was working 10-12 hour days building my career, so without his sacrifice we would not be doing as well as we are now. He's now about to try his hand as a professional bowler!
@@michaelmichaelsjr.1352 Fair. I only mentioned his training MMA to illustrate that he still had time to pursue some of his interests/goals while being a SAHD, which was one of the reasons he enjoyed the arrangement.
1:19:55 The people who say spreading negative stereotypes is shameful / harmful behaviour typically haven't interacted with those that the stereotype is of I worked in a place that was almost 50% vietnamese and almost 50% Sicilian (which was hell on my back, being 6'2" - all the benches were so low) The stuff they would say to each other was hilarious (and would be utterly condemned by the people who condemn spreading of negative stereotypes) - ugh, they're all so-and-so, Australia would be so much better if we didn't let them in (from 1st generation immigrants 🤣), etc, etc If you just read a transcript of what was said during any given day, you'd think they detested each other If you looked at how they interacted (including the way in which they said these things to each other) you'd see the clear love they had for each other
I wish there was a portal I could step through to see that. Did you ever partake in the volley? It reminds me of how my brother and I relate to each other. Well, I tend to volley more insults than he does, but he appreciates a good zinger. He was talking in a group that involved two of our cousins, one of which is studying Spanish informally. My brother said that he spews mierde del toro in Spanish. He translated it for the non-Spanish-studying cousin (which, in case anyone who reads this needs help) as bullshit, and that cousin said, "Oh, just like when you speak English." My brother still laughs about that one.
Employment bias flipped around 2009? It flipped a hell of a lot earlier than that. Women were being explicitly headhunted way back in the 1980s. Look for the appearance of the words "women and minorities are particularly encouraged to apply" in job ads.
34:40 These are good questions and Chris is having a hard time answering them. I'm sitting here almost yelling at my screen that it relates to provision and protection. If we're out trying to bring in resources for our survival, we need accurate information about those resources and the methods of collecting them. Likewise, if a lot of people are suddenly falling ill, we need accurate information about what's causing that. If there is a sudden flood, do we want accurate information about what needs to be done and who needs to do it? Or do we want to grab as many people as possible and put on a show of them 'working' equitably to dig a trench just anywhere. Show the members passing buckets along a line to nowhere just so everyone feels involved? That DOESN'T WORK!
I am a female Scientist and I can say that both myself and my female colleagues were interested in finding the truth regardless of whether it could be used for good or not. That is the purpose of Science and an inquiring mind. Science is the pursuit of truth.
@@markaurelius61 still no answer because its all lip service. thats how bad things have become, women fucked up so much in the past 50 years to the point male do not trust them at all.
Wokes is distracting us for something bad, the agenda of Evil people are constructing robots, arctificial inteligence, hibrid syntetic human babies, brain chips, milions of smal satelites for orbit planet and block sun light. they hate God and hate that humans with love on heart mind can access God power to use mind to affect reality universe dimensions. aliens ETs and evil humans folow satanic agenda for technology and ignore the organic nature things in planet and in human body mind. so make a new thing that has no conection with laws of life and holy spirit of God, so let stop hate the attackers ideology religion politic etc , are distraction strategy, for us not tell anything for stop agenda of technology self destruction of human kind. 97% DNA is light and sound, 3% protein, but the world system tells is 100% protein only. for we did not discovery our God power of vibration in love for affect reality with mind.
Hello you beauties. Access all episodes 10 hours earlier than UA-cam by Subscribing on Spotify - spoti.fi/2LSimPn or Apple Podcasts - apple.co/2MNqIgw. Here’s the timestamps:
00:00 The Myth of Pervasive Misogyny
04:49 Why Does the Media Focus on Anti-Female Bias?
18:18 How the Influx of Women in Academia Has Changed Education
23:06 Why Women Are More Egalitarian Than Men
31:53 Should We Still Trust Mainstream Science & Media Today?
42:18 Are Gender Disparities Caused By the Patriarchy?
49:38 The Gendered Differences in Slut-Shaming
53:06 Why Do People Hate Evolutionary Psychology?
1:03:08 Which of Cory’s Conclusions Has Been Most Controversial?
1:09:53 Why Academia is Censoring Studies Like Cory’s
1:22:41 The Middle-Aged, White, Female Overlords of Academia
1:32:33 What’s Next for Cory
Ello dude ..your casts are my go to listen on my 6am walk...I'm 57 and loaded my pension so I could retire early ..your pods are my citadel of fitness both mentally and physically ..love your style and quality of interview....your guests are the the wings lifting edge....or ..the fuckin dogz bollox of truthful opinion
Seems like these female overlords holds a lot of luxury beliefs.
@@bucko6641 This guest being the former, integrity is attractive.
@chriswillx I'm redpill/manosphere partly because of interviews like this. They were the 1st to popularize these talking points, especially the more intellectual side of the manosphere
Luxury beliefs that a) signal false virtue and b) are rather similar to "Munchausen syndrome by proxy", where someone "gets attention by faking or producing symptoms of illness in someone else, usually their child", except in this case, these middle managers are outsourcing the child role to ''vulnerable groups''.
I came up with a term that we can use to describe a certain kind of pernicious behavior. Vicarious victimhood. This describes people who feel the need to play the victim, but have never actually been victimized, so instead they choose to experience it vicariously through others that they perceive as marginalized. This vicarious victimhood feeds directly into empty virtue signaling.
Victimhood itself has become a source of privilege in American life. People feel entitled to literally 5 million dollar pay outs because they perceive themselves as victims and those ludicrous beliefs garner attention from public officials as legitimate.
I like it, I think you named it well - vicarious victimhood.
Weaponized victimhood.
The ability to use perceived oppression as a tool/weapon for one's own personal benefit.
"Vicarious victimhood" - thus confers the ability for one who has not been oppressed to LEECH onto that "bandwagon" in order to gain that "tool".
(Yes, that was a deliberate intent to equate them to parasites.)
For some people, however, there is a built-in "karma"...
Most people who convince themselves that they are somehow oppressed WILL be oppressed... by their own internal reactions to their self-delusion.
Unfortunately, this is also true of people who ALLOW themselves to BE convinced (by others) of their oppressed status.
As the meme goes...
"Play stupid games. Win stupid prizes."
Victimhood by proxy
Brilliant. Ice seen this dozens of times. Well said.
"In the fields that are dominated by women people are not particularly concerned about getting more men, whereas in the fields that are dominated by men they are desperately trying to get more women". This is a good summary about what is happenning nowadays. Cheers from Spain.
Then women wonder why there are no financially viable men to date.
No matter how they are distributed, the narrative will keep being pushed that there isn't enough women in a certain field, or black people in a certain field.
Moving them into a certain field means they will leave another field, so the cycle will just continue
Spain is a special level with the Rubiales case. Making something inappropriate to be a crime with an imagined victim.
@@gyozop yes, One of the craziest things feminism has done.
Yup
We live in a world absolutely overrun with misandry
As a male in nursing (now retired) I had one instructor in my masters program that tole me to my face that I would not pass her required class because she did not believe that men should be a nurse. In my bachelors program, one of the male students committed suicide due to anti-male harassment from a group of professors.
X able nurse here. They bulky abuse and make sure you know your job is at their will. Most are angry, single, and unhappy. Give a person power with low self esteem and you get tyrants. Man or woman
Don't let them get to you.
Are stronger than that.
Keep your goals in sight.
You should document this. Similar things have probably happened in other professions.
Nurcery cryme from Genesis ! Music speaking truth
But women get it hard when truth and facts speak
I’m a man and I described to my dr a number of times where my wife had thrown things at me, hit me and emotionally abused me. Neither of us recognised this was domestic violence. According to the publicity campaigns, domestic violence is about men attacking women.
If a woman is seen attacking a man, it is assumed he did something bad and he deserves it
Run.
Yes and this is the case with infidelity and divorce as well.
If he cheats, he’s a horrible husband.
If she cheats, he’s a horrible husband.
If he leaves, he’s a deadbeat.
If she leaves, he’s a deadbeat.
If he struggles, she leaves and finds a winner.
Women care not about a man’s struggles, they wait at the finish line and bang the winners.
I've seen my Da battered on a number of occasions. My Ma just gets away with it. One woman hit me and she was gone the next day. I watched and learned.
Good on you for recognising violence and abuse for what it is… violence and abuse. Now that you recognise this for what it is, with respect and self-love, what do you do next…?
True dat.
"We shouldn't trust science anymore."
Science + Politics = Politics
Science +politics =science fiction?
Science + Politics = Politics = Evil = OUCH!
@@stefwessels955 Science + politics = Oppenheimer
Science fiction
Now, it is even mixed with paid influencers.
She said something extremely important that gets glossed over -- which is: You come up with an 'unpopular' finding and the reaction is "This is bad research" ..... this is the silver bullet problem in peer-review (at least in the humanities and social sciences). If your findings are in-line with the narrative favored by the peerage ... you have a chance to publish (which is everything for your career). If you find something that runs counter to that narrative .... you won't make out it of that review. You'll be told there's some methodological problem with your work.
You could call it the paradox of intellectual progress.
@@grantbartley483not sure why on earth you'd call it that
@@LeFlamel The paradox is that to make intellectual progress often means first being rejected by the intellectuals and initially seen as wrong.
@@grantbartley483 Socrates hears you. ;)
Hasn’t this been ever-thus. Galileo was decried a heretic for declaring the earth orbits the sun. These institutes and their tightly held beliefs are no better than many religious doctrines of old and alive today. It’s a shame. We can’t connect with our past and have a honest discussion on the human ape to inform our future. It seems evolutionary psychology may just go underground until a more open minded paradigm emerges.
Interesting conversation. As someone in academia and psychology, a lot of this is very recognizable. There is this weird culture where female academics are given all the priviliges and advantages, while still being seen as the victims and oppressed group. Both men and women overwhelmingly participate in this illusion.
I've done a few (five I think) job interviews for after my phd and I couldn't help noticing that all the comittees that interviewed me were either 100% or at least 80% female. In the building I work there are posters that say "no means no" regarding sexual conduct or other such matters, I checked the stats in the area I live, sexual harassment is extremely rare here, as my experience indicates as well. Which is why I always found these posters so odd, probably a HR decision. The HR department has tried to equalize the number of male and female student in computer science more by reducing sexism (of which there is no indication) for over 5 years now, without any success. There were many programs available during my phd that were only available to women. And I could give many more examples like this. I don't necesarrily mind it either, I was never obstructed in my own work because of being a man, but it always seemed really odd to me that my female and male colleagues still really wanted to participate in this victimhood role of women in academia. It seems like a complete delusion to me.
I haven’t watched the video yet, but your comment caught my attention. My 3 daughters all had talents that would lend themselves to high earning stem fields. I offered instruction and tools for this. None were interested and are pursuing lower wage careers. They had posters all over their schools encouraging them to get into these fields, they just aren’t interested. Wage gap indeed… in my degree program there were 3 tracks. 2 were technical and paid well. 1 was neither techy nor highly paid. Our program was charitably 10% women. Not a single one picked the high earning tech tracks. When asked, “I’m not interested in that”. Fast forward many years and a disconcerting percentage are complaining about salary and the patriarchy. Sigh…
"Both men and women overwhelmingly participate in this illusion."
Men do it because they have to to keep putting food on the table.
Oh it has affected you I am certain. Bet some of the job interviews you had didn't take you in because your are a man.
Male here to say what I don’t say publicly. I teach in academia currently and I don’t talk in meetings. I no longer chit chat with faculty in the halls. If I talk to other male teachers we close the door to our office and talk quietly. In class I act as if I’m into the current thing and my marks have gone way up. The other male teachers pretty much do the same thing. Last year a male teacher marked according to what they thought would be industry standards for their subject. This year his contract wasn’t renewed.
Us male instructors are seeing our academic careers as a job, show up, punch the clock, keep our mouths shut. Our school is now 80% female students. Over half identify as LGBTQ+. We’re constantly told by students that we’re privileged, oppressive and our interests are only valid is we act accordingly. Or hiring policies openly say they favour marginalized people, white makes need not apply.
Non-academic here. But I am curious about lesbians and gay people. Had a few friends who were gay. Someone in this thread made a comment on, apparently there are lots of lesbians in academia. 🤔I've observed similar things on sexuality and human achievement. I tried to figure out why some people are gay or lesbian, putting together a few things I've noticed, over the years. My idea is 2 words as a new concept: gay privilege.
Here's my lay guess, how that make sense:
Are gays and lesbians actually privileged now?
My argument: Gay & lesbian Americans have higher incomes than straights, higher education levels than straights. Like lesbians in academia. Why is that?
There is some evidence of higher IQs in those lesbian and gay populations, than the general norm. Why is that? A high level woman soccer (football) player I know (straight girl) told me lesbians at the high end of woman's sports, are vastly over-represented. 🤔Why this lesbian sports pattern? My guess is, something is going on, biologically....that needs to be unpacked by academics, if we are to get past our biases.
I read an old article on Breitbart by Milo Yinnopoulos, "Sorry girls, all the smartest people in the world are all men." (searchable online) He says the evidence says gender and IQ are related. But not in the way people think. On average, there is no real difference in male female IQ....except on the high and low end. Basically men have more geniuses, more idiots. So the math balances.
Milo is gay, his opinion seems to be the reason for extremely high IQ people being mostly male, even though the genders general IQ is equal, is that nature takes more chances on men, tries new formulas out in evolution. You see the same thing in other species: for instance in birds, beak size varies more in bird males, than bird females.
Feminist Camille Paglia put it this way: "The reason there are are more male geniuses, more male Mozarts than female ones, is there are more male Jack the Rippers." In other words, evolution rolls the dice on males, more than females Tries new things, genetically. That may also explain why 98% of the homeless are males: more male losers, as Mother Nature rolls the dice, often fails.
That risk taking rolling of the dice by nature is far less common in females, than males, apparently. Thus female IQ tends to cluster around the middle, whereas even though men and women as groups are the same in IQ, you get far more low IQ Homer Simpson males than females, who tend to be mostly Marge Simpsons. As well as more dumb Homer males, you get more high IQ Mozart males as a mathematical compliment, to keep the genders equal, in the math of evolution.
My guess is, gay men in particular, are nature trying out new biological formulas, getting some things right, like higher IQ, but other things that don't work, like no attraction to the other gender. Thus I've long thought the idea of condemning males for being gay, was absurd. Lesbians? More of the same, but less common than gay men. That may explain why so many high achieving lesbians are in academia and on the soccer pitch.
I think to win acceptance for sexual minorities, the truth has to finally win the day. If a good evidence based case can be made, based on science for what I said, a lot fewer people would come up with their nonsense prejudiced views on gay people. But in the mean time, if I'm right, people will be angry, if this is true. Why?
As my favorite comedian the late George Carlin once said, "The truth shall set you free. But first, it will piss you off."
Strangely enough, the people who generally oppose such research into the origins of sexuality and IQ, which might actually vindicate gay people, tend to often be gay people or their allies....all for "harm avoidance". I don't think there is anything to fear. Except ignorance.
If I am correct in my speculation, then yes of course, gays were discriminated against heavily in history. The gay theorists are right about that. But at same time gays and lesbians are likely now over represented at university and in the media and in positions of power and wealth and influence now, based on higher IQ levels...thus Gay Privilege.
I think the creators of Family Guy already know this. They have some pretty funny cartoons of gay rich people. Cheers. 🍻🍺
The scariest thing about my degree in psychology was a professor literally teaching students to over medicate a person to the point of not being functional claiming it was better for the patient than their depression.
What was the reasoning behind that?
Had the same exact moment when I was doing my psych rotation in medical school. The rationale is that you want to zombify them and then slowly wean them off the medication until they regain consciousness but aren’t having active hallucinations therefore you can have a conversation with them. But it’s quite jarring.
In an age of deceit, telling truth becomes a revolutionary act, good on you for saying what you see 👍
I bet you got criticized by people that don’t even believe in red light therapy 😅
You MUST read the books "Anatomy of an Epidemic" by Robert Whitaker and Psychiatryland-- can't remember the name of the author-- but he's very nice. Life did not used to be like this. And, of course read anything by Dr. Peter Breggin
I'm a Boomer. I can confirm that there used to be a bias in hiring for "traditionally" male jobs. But there were reasons for it, and it wasn't limited to women. One example I can point to is when I worked part-time at a GE warehouse in Sacramento, CA. There was another part-time guy there as well. A full-time job came up as a lift truck operator. They gave him the job. When I asked why they told me that he was married and needed the job more than me. This is also why men used to get preference over women. Men were seen as the main "breadwinner" for the family and wives working was an option. Feminism ridiculed homemaking to death and demanded equal hiring laws, which really meant that many men would become deadbeat dads. Later in 1974, when I was working at a speaker factory in the woodshop making cabinets, I was displaced by a woman who complained that there were no women in the cabinet shop. So I was tossed out of that position. I floated from department to department doing fill in work until I was laid off later on that year. It was a year and a half before I found another job. I ended up going back to college and getting a grad degree. But when I went to apply for a small business loan I was flat-out told that being a white male was not a desirable attribute for getting into the program. And it just piled on over the decades.
I hear you brother. Equality has ended up being exactly the opposite.
@@barryduff5058 Because it's not equality, but rather equity, which by its very nature brings discrimination.
Why did you guys sell out every generation beneath you? You're still in power, why do you let this happen?
I had a similar experience when an equally qualified man was give. The promotion because he had a family to maintain. As a man I understood the reason. Made and still makes sense to me.
What's really mind boggling to me is how I'm in a good marriage with a woman who's smart and listens to me, and we're concentrating on how we can make each other happy and better--and then I go out in the world and hear this stuff, and immediately get resentful. It's got to be happening everywhere, and it's obnoxious that it seeps into the relationships that are working. It has to be 100 times harder for someone who doesn't have a decent partner or counterexample in their lives.
I am in a similar situation. I've been happily married to a wonderful man for 20 yrs. And I don't understand these gender wars. I hear women complain and I hear men complain. But men, want women to either change and settle for a man who she feels is not on her level or they become passport bros. Women on the other hand, complain, but they are just saying NO to relationships altogether.
Sign of the times.
@@tigre9271some women do have unrealistic standards. I know a 34 year old woman that wants a millionaire bf that over 200 cm tall and is under 25 and has a masters degree and perfectly fit body. And she is still allowed to sleep around and he has to be loyal to her and never talk to other women and let her be in charge of all the money and he’s not allowed to have guy friends or play video games or watch movies with women in them
@tigre9271 No women just have disgustingly overblown demands and standards for some men and are loose whores for most. you have no idea, and cannot comment, on the terrible state of women half your age.
@@markbennett5812 I know both genders have standards. I don't care to get into them because its irrelevant. Some are reasonable and some are unreasonable. It's already been argued about and it continues to be argued about. Some resorting to manipulative tactics and some giving up altogether. I'm actually tired of hearing about the discrepancies. Each person needs to take personal responsibility for themselves and reassess their situation and options. But they need to take time to take a hard, and honest look at themselves instead of blaming others. Blaming others is giving your power to the other person. And you can't rely on the other person to change in order to suit your needs. Nobody wants to work on themselves. Especially their emotional maturity. It's easier to blame the other person. Which not only gets you nowhere, it makes the situation WORSE. No one can see their complaining is futile.
@@tigre9271 I just know I’ll never met womens standards and it’s impossible for me to improve since I can’t change my height or race
40:00 I was dating a girl in her 12th year of getting her PhD in archeology. She once told me about a published paper about "queer archeology" on the inuit people that was in her own words was only 20% true but NEEDED to be published because it helped disadvantaged have academic credibility. I pointed out that what that paper says is you can't trust anything they published, she said it didn't matter.
This is why student loan forgiveness is a non-starter. We all know where that money went.
12th year of college or just the PhD? Even doctors don't take that long. Sounds like a professional student.
LOL there's a reason why women hold 2/3rds of all student loan debt...
@@dragons_red A professional feminist activist more like it
Dishonesty is for the weak.
The reason why there has traditionally been more "slut shaming" vs. women than men is that this strategy is much more effective to reduce the social loss of children without parents.
If you try to convince 100 men to avoid promiscuity and are 90% successful, there will still be 10% of men who ignore that admonition and these 10 men will impregnate all of the 100 (promiscuous) women in the population.
If you convince 100 women to avoid promiscuity and are 90% successful, you will only have 10 out of wedlock births to cope with.
Errors in a life and death situation end up in death. So if you are intersted in preserving life, finding the truth should be your utmost priority.
Exactly. The truth floats across time, lies sink to the bottom.
It's HER bridge (that collapsed).
keep thinking that life cares about your value judgements. it feels wholesome
This is why I consider misinformation to be harmful.
So people who say “as long as I’m not harming anyone” should not be interested in free speech, because free speech assumes the right to harm others with misinformation.
@@CompactCognitionThe way free speech works is we filter misinformation through experience and consensus, not by having the Women's March decide.
The obsession with victimhood is a manifestation of the corruption of empathy. That is why these pathogenic understandings of social relationships are so tempting to good intending people. They fail to understand or perceive that virtues can be corrupted…that when taken to extremes, can become harms.
This is just basic Narcissistic Personality Disorder. They need supply, they play victim, and Empaths give them their supply.
ooof...we all need to sit with that for a while! 🧠👍
Very thoughtful and clear point. I think there is much truth to it.
Absolute.
What exactly do you mean by "pathogenic understandings of social relationships"?
As a male Scientist in medical research, it's really disturbing to think that a majority of my female colleagues could potentially be hiding their results that have uncomfortable truths. Chasing the truth is what we swore to do as scientific truth seekers, is it not?
This is a really good conversation. The public theatre of gender relations is dominated by angry people these days, so it is a real pleasure to have two intelligent, articulate, and likable people who evidently like each other engaged in a natural conversation about gender relations. They are often blunt but never polemical. They are sometimes funny. There are some good insights and while their exchange relates particularly to academia, it goes everywhere.
The biggest secret of all is that nobody is honestly surprised when they hear this.
If we could all be real, and not fear the wrath of the unflattered female, this information wouldn't even be podcast worthy. Cause we all already know it.
I still do not understand this phenomenon. When did we hand control over to the crazies.
@@derekaarts4997 When you adopted the big lie that men 'oppress women' now or ever. Even in Cairo her experience is likely a result of cultural expectations in which men and women are segregated, and cultural expectations of men taking point to protect women.
@@derekaarts4997 It started in 1960 with equality and the antibaby pill.
@@r.s.4174 - if this era needed breathing room to start, it was the down fall of WW11. when in the course of the war, 50,000,000 men were out of the household and the wives had to look to and for other means to support the remaining in the households. this put a big head on their shoulders. the "woman can do anything a man can do" attitude came about.....but just not go die for their men.
when all these men came home, solutions were made and put in place. government subsitites, huge chunks of women joining the work force. took on and over farm fields. picking crops and what not..
the men couldn't just take their womens places in all these positions. so they came home, not needed or nearly as much. time went on where men now not pulling their weight as they use to, in the eyes of their women, making their women take them as a joke and a not needed extra body in the house.
this flip flopped the mass of mens roles basically. now we are seeing the full effects of the reversal.
reminds me of the fight for human rights for all. that in general everyone and life has the same value, prior to that....everyone outside of a royalty structure, was and could be a slave and or peasant. in terms of the fight, this is what men are finding themselves doing all over again but now, just for their own gender.
when we did this together, we learned along the way. what fit and worked best of the role of man and a woman.
this can only actually lead to some sort of civil war between the two. and a major over correction will likely happen i bet. where these men battered by society and their own women, turn into humas like mentalities towards women. so if that happens. welp, they brong it on themselves. well with a good deal of democrat party help.
a woman declaring her child is not worthy of birth and life, funny enough....wipes out all progress towards human rights that we all made and we be starting over from that stand point. killing their babies is oddly enough, lop sided. wanted boys over girls, in a womans mind, still knowing the boy holds more value in the household. so i expect a ongoing decline of girl babies being born amongst these abortions they performing on mass scale now days.
if or when that happens, is likely the generations to fallow of now majority men, will start regaining their position on the hierarchy. might not be a humas like mentality, but i bet not far from it. considering the fact that the men in them coming generations, will eventually pull the majority in political positions and power, will really push society into that direction.
on the hole, this is my thoughts. yeah and in words of Dr Evil.. "on the hole, preparation H does feel right" lmao... meaning we, us men of the now and past 2 generations straight are really getting fukt and some hurt butthole ointment is needed lol
@@derekaarts4997 because they successfully infused their people/politics in the positions of power.
The "educated" elites have bought into this, and they are the ones effectively cow towing to it. The vast majority of reasonable people are not in positions of direct power and influence, which is why we need to exert more effort to take action against this. It's partly our fault for letting the inmates take over the asylum due to self interest or assumptions that the culture would just keep on going.
This was a very valuable interview for me… I have been listening for several months about the concerns in universities about censorship and silencing voices that are controversial. I couldn’t understand what the shift was. I am a 71 year old woman who went to university in the late 60s and the mid-80s. And the staff was predominantly male. and the focus was finding as much truth as possible… Philosophically and scientifically.
It is stunning to realize that since the proportions of male to female in the teaching ranks, as well as the student ranks, has so shifted towards female that focus and thrust of going to university is now agreeableness.
Trigger warnings, refusing to invite, controversial speakers, canceling presentations. These were unheard of when I was in university. Part of what was important was the presence of disparate viewpoints and expression.
Being around people who you disagree with, but can explain themselves in depth and cogently, is what teaches us to communicate, and to listen, effectively. And currently in this US culture we’re seeing more and more How people no longer know how to listen to one another.
Thank you this was very insightful for me.
I've wondered for years if the claims from women about sexism stem from actual sexism or if it's men sniffing out a tendency toward whininess and laziness and steering clear. I think the early feminists understood better than the current crop that to do things associated with men meant you had to take on the toughness of men. Now it seems that women want the male power at their convenience but than hand off the dirty stuff.
I went for a natural sciences degree and had three female professors in the area, and perhaps it's hypocritical, but I thought none of them were good at their jobs. I seriously learned more from my male profs. I'm afraid this feelings, feelings, feelings agenda is invading even things like computer science, engineering, and chemistry. I don't think the likes of Elizabeth Blackwell, Marie Curie, and Lise Meitner pushed for this sort of inclusivity. I like being a tomboy, as it helps me be a little more level-headed about certain emotional things.
University, around the turn of the century, say 2000, it was 90% female.
The education was ok, but not great in many ways.
The whole place was painted a pastey pink..
I put in a complaint against a radical man-hating feminist lecturer...I saw a lot of angles on this topic..
The hypocrisy was massive.
It was actually quite damaging to experience it.
The politics and lack of proper process.
The competitiveness was not fun..
There was one very nice Irish one...a few good ones..but most of them hostile.
They gave me more things to rebel against I suppose 😂😂😂
Anyway I could write a book out of it..
I love this "non woke" logical perspective. Cory, you have a new fan.
This guest isn't nearly as right wing as you seem to believe her to be. Her positions are quite cleanly standard academia gray. Most scientists are center-left/leftist but not in the morphology that right wingers seem to characterize us, and only because most data supports liberal policy. The id pol bullshit that is rampant right now in US politics is not a priority point for most scientists and we can all rather easily engage in nuance with topics that the twitter left sees as taboo.
Woke is insanity. Literal insanity
How about asking: "what provisions were put in place to STOP this bias once parity is reached?'". I've got the slight suspition that the answer is 'none'. Because this is not an objective, it's something else.
@@gwho as someone who used to lean far left i have escaped that ideology.
They confuse the wider economy's nepotistic milieu with the meritocratic milieu that one finds in academia and sports. Commencement means to begin but a huge number of people never seem to begin.
I have such little respect for most psychology departments across many Universities which are responsible for much of this woke nonsense but this was a good conversation. Cory is switched on and refreshing to watch.
Wokes is distracting us for something bad, the agenda of Evil people are constructing robots, arctificial inteligence, hibrid syntetic human babies, brain chips, milions of smal satelites for orbit planet and block sun light. they hate God and hate that humans with love on heart mind can access God power to use mind to affect reality universe dimensions. aliens ETs and evil humans folow satanic agenda for technology and ignore the organic nature things in planet and in human body mind. so make a new thing that has no conection with laws of life and holy spirit of God, so let stop hate the attackers ideology religion politic etc , are distraction strategy, for us not tell anything for stop agenda of technology self destruction of human kind.
97% DNA is light and sound, 3% protein, but the world system tells is 100% protein only. for we did not discovery our God power of vibration in love for affect reality with mind.
if only that was limited to psychology departments...
every single one has been subverted all over the whiter countries. every. single. fucking. one. 🙄
A lot of this woke nonsense comes from Women's and Ethnic Studies Departments.
All psychology should be based in the natural sciences and properly constructed experiments, not social science theories. For example, most of Freud's theories were completely debunked by experimental psychology in the 1960s/1970s but they still teach his rubbish to this day.
This interview explains why the rot in academia exists and who’s culpable for it. Cory is a delightful woman who’s doing valuable work.
when the truth is ignored or suppressed b/c it may hurt someone's feelings, everyone loses.
That is how we have gotten the entire alphabet movement. Ignoring truth b/c it hurts some people that they are, and always will be the sex they were born as.
I've heard these things years ago from Stefan Molyneux. But of course he is a right extremist and deserves to be deplatformed.
Generally speaking it's now the same in Corporate environments as well. The goal to be better and more efficient is being superseded by what is determined to be "Fair". And it's being determined by others who don't have a clue what it entails. Performance and efficiency have traditionally been compensated better. If the slackers on your left and right aren't pulling their weight and are still getting paid the same or better; what motivations do you have to work hard or strive for excellence? Doubly so if they are being paid better simply because they are different gender or race. Growing up in the 80's and 90's, I was always taught that none of that mattered. Now thanks to the DEI nonsense, you are damned if you notice the differences and then still damned if you don't acknowledge the differences.
"Everything Burns"
@@shauncalton815 it’s just the case thats what society wants because of feminism . women everywhere take men out of the market and you see this especially in the job market
In other words, another institution where women have invaded men's spaces and turned them into 🐕💩. Now we see the rise of absolutely worthless degrees and the devaluing of higher educ .... sorry indoctrination
IE: There were no HR departments until women entered the workforce.
I remember watching a video where a speaker(who was a woman) was describing the differences between men and women and as an example said "Men are generally taller than women" and the crowd booed as if she said the most vile thing imaginable.
It means that most people are literally insane. If you won't believe what you can see with your eyes, how is that not insane? That's like booing for "the sky is blue".
@@brendangolledge8312I wonder if it's less that and more just total undisguised jealousy
I don't view the past "misogyny" as exploitation so much as infantilization. Men in the past more treated women like children rather than a subclass to be used and exploited. eg the phrase "women and children first" would not have become a thing if men just viewed women as inferior and of less value. Men are instinctually protective of women while they are not instinctually protective of other men. This is something feminism gets very wrong. They're attacking men for being over protective in the modern world, while believing men intend them harm which is not just false but 100% opposite of reality. imo we evolved to be this way because it was necessary in a state of nature for men to play the role of "protector" for the group including if it meant sacrificing their lives for their tribe/family. I also believe this is why women's voices don't change - it was evolutionarily to reinforce the authoritarian role of protector among men back when it made evolutionary sense to do so.
This is a deep and complicated topic which imo our western society (especially the english speaking countries) is totally deluded about, and unfortunately this delusion is getting strongly reinforced in academia by people (both men and women) who are giving in to their biases of being protective of women, rather than letting scientific research happen in the areas of gender studies in an unbiased way.
At some point in the future there will be a reckoning for this and I believe the (feminist) academics who have been pushing their biases rather than actual unbiased research will not be remembered fondly in the future and there will be a lot of angry men, primarily on the left, when they realize just much modern feminism has transformed from a gender-equality movement to a movement that is mostly focused on (unfair) misandry and gynocentricity.
Interesting comment. There were and are cultures that did not value women. But excluding that, I don't believe it was exploitation either, at least not in western culture, and especially English speaking societies. As for protection this was certainly true in the Middle class (in the British sense) and above, but in the working class it was more difficult for men to protect women, even if that was what they were trying to do. This is the fundamental problem of feminism, it is elitist and only seeks to improve the lives of women of a certain class and above, whilst making life for working class women more difficult.
I also witnessed this destructive feminised takeover of a large UK Universities Psychology/Sociology department in 2001... it was brutal and final in removing ALL men from senior positions! I was forced to abandon my Master's degree directly due to my social psychological academic research and scientific interests! Great interview, Cory is the 'real thing'... much thanks!
Just remember.. it’s only discrimination when it happens to women or minorities.
"...I also witnessed this destructive feminised takeover of a large UK university psychology/Sociology department..." Add Sweden, Norway, Spain, Germany, Australia, New Zealand and Canada to the list
The pendulum swings
@@johnthedespicabledutchman7406 Iceland is the worst one though. Or at least a top contender... it's insane here.
@@jrussell243 Hope not because the swing back from this will cost women the right to vote and to own property.
Wow. Amazing episode. I am unbelievably frustrated with the lack of truth, and straight up male discrimination in society nowadays, and this perfectly helps understand things a little better. Keep at it Cory, you are fantastic, and a very brave woman as well for this. Hopefully Rogan picks you up and gets you on his show, as this needs to seen by as many people as possible.
The subject they are talking about in the beginning is called the "Women are Wonderful Effect."
I agree. But dont forget to do your part by simply being honest about what you believe when the subject comes up in real life.
@@hunterbidensaidslesion1356 … Professor Janice Fiamengo (U Ottawa) has been talking about that “little problem” for many years.
It’s a well-kept secret, but most women don’t identify as feminists. Just like men, most women simply want fair treatment. If asked to choose between identifying as a feminist or advocating for gender equality, most women would choose the latter.
Please c😅c
The more I watch the more satisfied I am with having left my psych degree. It seems that all my shelved research ideas getting to the root of relational aggression would have gotten me ostracized due to inherent differences of aggression in men and women 😅
What's 'relational aggression'? Is it aggressive behaviour between couples in a relationship? And what would these 'inherent differences' be? Predictably, we could posit that men are more aggressive in general and in relationships, and study that. Any research result that produces a 'yes' would be welcomed by academia now.
@@markus717No.
That's incorrect.
Men and women are most likely equally aggressive.
Men however are more likely to enact agression physically ( which is what we are adapted at ).
Women enact agression via social and psychological means, reputation destruction. Etc ( Which is what women are adapted at ).
Men tend to fix problems.
Women try hash out their feelings about problems by talking about them.
I'll give you you a few hints from RL.
If we take heterosexual relations as having the average rates of violence in relations.
Then relations between 2 homosexual men have *lower* rates of violence.
And women in homosexual relations have a *higher* rate of violence in their relationships.
Do you think that is by accident?
Is the Metoo movement particularly dangerous to be handed over to empower women ?
The truth is men are more bold about agressions in public while women are more selective about agressions and abuse, mainly in more isolated spaces / domestic. Despite what statistics say they don't take into account unreported domestic violence on men otherwise I would bet a million dollars that real statistics would show a higher percentage of DV perpetrated on men.
Honestly I enjoy psychology and studying human nature and animals themselves but by being a certified psychologist I would be doing more harm than good to male clients as I will be expected to demonize everyone including myself for being born with a penis. This is why therapy, couples counceling and such is pointless for men and why they will not go to them unless strongarmed into doing so. Women simply can get away with violence and abuse and men cannot defend themselves. They are still good at controlling their violence in public better than men.
@@dwwolf4636 There's a fair amount of research showing that in relationships that feature reciprocal DV, the female partner is the one who initiates physical violence about 70% of the time on average. This also links to data showing that lesbian relationships have the highest rates of physical violence.
I think that for a lot of women, talking about their problems is less about understanding their feelings than it's a way to get validation for their feelings and behaviour. Also, if you're the friend who says something like "Actually in this situation I think you were in the wrong...", you'll find that a man will be far more likely to react in a calm and reasonable way and take your advice on board, whereas a woman is fairly likely to react angrily and dismiss any criticism out of hand.
Here is my updated and improved version of G. Michael Hopf's original insight:
1. Hard times create strong men.
2. Strong men create good times.
3. Good times create weak men.
4. Weak men create radical women.
5. Radical women create hard times.
I've often said "once politics are injected into science, it is no longer science."
It's like Botox.
It is fortunate for the rest of us that you've often said that.
Politics are integral to science.
@@toomuchinformationAbsolutely not. They are inescapable, but few things are integral to science.
Science is all about proving yourself wrong, politics is all about proving you're right.
@@toomuchinformation LMAO! Politics have 0 to do with science. Nothing in the scientific method says you need politics to prove a theory. What a brainlet take! 🤣
Shes on point about academia and whats happening to it. However, I believe what she described as egalitarian vs hierarchy was wrong. Men are perfectly egalitarian, you can try anything you want, but you should end doing what youre best at. What she was describing for the women was equitarian, where anyone can do anything regardless of how good at it they are. That doesnt emd well.
The reason men are not "slut shamed" the same as women has to do with the varying levels of difficulty. For a woman to be promiscuous is not difficult, even woman that are not seen as attractive can have many sexual partners. For a man to have many sexual partners a man has to be successful,charming,physically fit, so it is more difficult for a man to achieve the same result.
It’s the old analogy; what do you call a key that opens many locks?
A master key.
What do you call a lock that can be opened by any key?
A garbage lock.
Today's society has less and less in common with reality each day.
Because women dont want to live in reality. If you tell them the truth, they get upset so everyone lies to them and then they vote based on those lies.
Which is why it has become more and more degenerate.
Good at last we will be extinct
I really hope things balance out because things have become very toxic and crazy. Its amazing to me how fast our country has gone down hill.
The real reason they don't like STEM is a lack of the required ability.
Please talk to other women about this! It improves the health of our children and the future.
@@wills242 They too indoctrinated to understand
Allowing them to vote was our primary error
@@Powertuber1000 that’s starting to be a very real/common perspective. I personally would never have guessed that growing up.
I appreciate a good conversation based on the pursuit of truth. Very refreshing. Much love from Calgary.
The is probably the best video Chris Williamson has come out with.
This entire video not only validates my lived experiences but also my pondered conclusions too. I feel sane again!
Cory is also an absolute gem! Thanks to her for enduring criticism and standing up for the true nature of science and empiricism
Here's to the truth ALWAYS being prioritised first!!!!
Have you ever had an unlived experience?
@@kenrehill8775 🤣 I'm stealing that.
@@ChaniJRandazzo you’re welcome. It’s drives fckwits crazy, they hate a dose of truth and fact
Wokes is distracting us for something bad, the agenda of Evil people are constructing robots, arctificial inteligence, hibrid syntetic human babies, brain chips, milions of smal satelites for orbit planet and block sun light. they hate God and hate that humans with love on heart mind can access God power to use mind to affect reality universe dimensions. aliens ETs and evil humans folow satanic agenda for technology and ignore the organic nature things in planet and in human body mind. so make a new thing that has no conection with laws of life and holy spirit of God, so let stop hate the attackers ideology religion politic etc , are distraction strategy, for us not tell anything for stop agenda of technology self destruction of human kind.
97% DNA is light and sound, 3% protein, but the world system tells is 100% protein only. for we did not discovery our God power of vibration in love for affect reality with mind.
@@kenrehill8775 Yeah, but I'm not telling you about it, as it's innately personal!😉
So true, during the recession in 2009 I was let go from my job. It was between myself and a newer female hire. She was awesome, super capable and lovely. Though I had more tactile experience at the time it did not matter. The culture had shifted significantly and the company made the right decision. She eventually became VP of the company. I lost everything. Two very important realizations happened for me during this time. If I wanted any kind of future I would have to work a thousand times harder than anyone else, male or female, even if I owned my own company. If men have had any inherent advantage in the past, those days are long gone. We are simply back to what we have always been, expendable workers and cannon fodder. I don't despair because the constant reminder to stay on my toes has been invaluable and the experience has strengthened my faith in God. I tell any young man who will listen to pursue excellence above all else because that will give you the only advantage you will ever have. And maybe this reality is for the best. Thank you for the excellent content Chris.
You amazing man, your wisdom was earned and you have been blessed. Thank you
I understand what you’re saying, I just don’t see anything good ultimately in living in delusion. Truth may hurt but it is the most important thing for surviving in reality
Not sure what you mean friend?@@tonyvieira4534
I had a very difficult time finding a (good) job throughout the 2010s, but I know if I was a woman (or black) I would have easily been hired with my qualifications. Yet I'm supposed to believe this is a patriarchy and I have all the privilege and women are basically slaves who are finally breaking the chains. It's that gaslighting that bothers me more. If you want to take over, create a matriarchy, fine, go for it, make that power play, but don't pretend you're the victim. Be upfront, say what you mean, have some honor.
While I agree that young men should pursue excellence, a society should provide those that perform their tasks with enough incentives to continue doing that and guarantee long term stability.
Not everyone can achieve the same things and as the demands start increasing, a lot of people will not be able to experience enough success to remain invested in society.
So a certain amount of fairness is necessary to make sure a large enough amount of people can have some success.
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation:
00:00 🚺 Dr. Clark discusses pervasive misogyny, questioning its validity in modern Western societies.
00:18 🌍 Personal experience in Cairo highlights societal differences in gender treatment.
00:33 🇺🇸 Contrast of gender biases in the U.S. compared to other parts of the world.
00:47 📝 Mention of a paper reviewing recent research on gender biases.
01:00 ⚖️ Discussion on biases favoring women over men in various domains.
01:14 🔬 Bias against scientific findings that portray men more favorably than women.
01:28 🤔 Theory on societal concern for women possibly stemming from caring more about women than men.
01:57 ❓ Difficulty in measuring societal biases against men and women.
02:24 🏫 Exploration of potential biases in academia.
02:52 🔄 Shift in biases favoring women since around 2009.
03:33 💭 Discussion on biases in favor of women and lack of attention to biases against men.
04:29 🧠 Studies showing preference for findings that women are more intelligent than men.
04:58 📰 Media focus on anti-female biases despite evidence of pro-female biases.
05:25 📚 Explanation for mainstream narratives focusing on potential harm to women.
06:06 🧬 Discussion on evolutionary value of women and its influence on societal concerns.
06:49 🕒 Contextualization of biases across different cultures and times.
07:03 🔄 Cultural narrative contributing to overcorrection in addressing gender disparities.
07:31 🗞️ Concept of gamma bias in media reporting.
08:11 💬 Impact of media portrayal on public perception of gender-related issues.
08:50 📈 Discussion on the increasing number of female CEOs and societal implications.
09:02 🧪 Examination of biases within psychology academia.
09:57 🔍 The influence of academia on public understanding and interpretation of gender biases.
10:26 🧐 Exploration of the reasons behind the interpretation that the world is sexist against women.
11:22 💡 Insight into how women's increasing power in institutions can focus attention on their interests.
12:19 🚺 Misconceptions about discrimination against women in male-dominated fields.
12:58 📢 Influence of media and academia on public narratives about gender disparities.
13:25 🏢 Discussion on the lack of public recognition for male achievements compared to female ones.
14:34 🤷 Discussion on why women might have misandrous tendencies or biases.
15:29 🔍 Analysis of the disparity in academic and public concern for misogyny vs. misandry.
16:12 💪 Examination of societal denial of physical differences between men and women.
17:34 🧠 Gender differences in cognitive tasks and societal implications.
18:51 📊 Analysis of the changing gender dynamics in higher education and its impact on academic culture.
20:01 🚹 Exploration of how increasing female presence in academia affects research and teaching approaches.
21:12 🤝 Discussion on the gender differences in prioritizing scientific truth versus moral concerns.
22:36 🏆 Exploration of gender differences in attitudes towards competition and achievement in academia.
23:17 🧬 Analysis of evolutionary influences on gender differences in societal roles and behaviors.
24:54 🏀 Examination of gender differences in sports team dynamics and competitiveness.
25:36 💪 Discussion on physical vulnerability influencing women's social strategies.
26:15 🧠 Analysis of psychological differences between men and women affecting societal priorities.
28:09 📈 Exploration of gender differences in academic values and their impact on scientific goals.
29:06 🏫 Statistical analysis of gender differences in attitudes towards academic freedom and controversial topics.
29:48 🤔 Discussion on the fundamental differences in scientific motivation between men and women.
31:56 🔄 Analysis of changing cultural narratives about women and their impact on academia and society.
33:33 🧠 Exploration of the challenge in justifying the pursuit of scientific truth over moral concerns.
34:57 💡 Discussion on the importance of pursuing empirical truth in science for accurate societal decision-making.
36:35 📚 Analysis of the potential harm caused by suppressing scientific findings.
38:00 📉 Examination of the consequences of ignoring scientific evidence for the sake of social concerns.
39:09 🚫 Discussion on the impact of censoring scientific research on women's advancement.
39:23 ⚽ Analysis of the performance differences between professional male and female sports teams.
40:05 🧠 Exploration of cognitive differences between men and women in specific tasks.
41:02 📊 Discussion on the representation of men and women in higher education
Made with HARPA AI
In Dutch we have the expression "Soft healers make for stinking wounds" meaning that if you don't want to make the optimal but difficult choice to prevent the hurt caused by that choice the end result could be worse. A surgeon that refuses to amputate a badly wounded and infected limb because he/she feels sad for that patient having to go through life without that limb runs the very real risk that patient will no longer have a life to live.
Men will cut off that limb without a second thought, women not so much.
Society - including science - is rapidly going down the drain because women have gained too much power and are not willing to make the difficult decisions in order to prevent perceived harm without eye for the possible benefits.
Kan je me alsjeblieft zeggen hoe je dat in het Nederlands zegt? ""Soft healers make for stinking wounds" "ik leer altijd graag nieuwe Nederlandse uitdrukkingen. Bedankt!
if you really believe this is a man woman thing you are not so bright. this is orchestrated. by whom does not matter. it is simply there to create division and confusion so others can capitalize on said state of affairs.
Damn this paragraph is gold.
Really like that expression! Something for me to keep in mind in my profession where it's tempting to avoid saying hurtful truths.
@@spellandshield Zachte heelmeesters maken stinkende wonden.
Brilliant interview Chris, a fascinating topic and a wonderful guest. Thank you sir.
Wokes is distracting us for something bad, the agenda of Evil people are constructing robots, arctificial inteligence, hibrid syntetic human babies, brain chips, milions of smal satelites for orbit planet and block sun light. they hate God and hate that humans with love on heart mind can access God power to use mind to affect reality universe dimensions. aliens ETs and evil humans folow satanic agenda for technology and ignore the organic nature things in planet and in human body mind. so make a new thing that has no conection with laws of life and holy spirit of God, so let stop hate the attackers ideology religion politic etc , are distraction strategy, for us not tell anything for stop agenda of technology self destruction of human kind.
97% DNA is light and sound, 3% protein, but the world system tells is 100% protein only. for we did not discovery our God power of vibration in love for affect reality with mind.
"Morality is cowardice." -Neitzsche
“What he meant by that was that, most of what people claim to be moral virtue, is merely their fear to do anything that they would actually like to do that society would deem inappropriate.”
- Jordan Peterson
Republicans
FWIW how I'd push back against "men and women are psychologically different because of patriarchy and social expectations" would be "or patriarchy and social expectations arose from the psychological differences between men and women".
I think you'll find it to be true (if only you look) that "staying home and raising a family" will be the most satisfying life work for somewhere between 75 & 90% of women. Even Stevie Nicks says she feels like she missed something important. 43:00
Chris the wide majority of us Blacks do not use that definition of racism: power+ privilege. That was created by the same academics starting around 2009, like you guys mentioned.
I'm 33 and I didn't hear that definition until after I graduated college.
While I agree with you that a majority of blacks don't use that definition I heard this way before 2009. If you know pro black crowds this has always been their definition. They would call most other transgressions prejudice
@@allenoverall7361 pro-black crowds are foundationally communist and usually base their beliefs on obfuscation and revisionist history.
Women have better side vision and are mire observant than men,Thus they are better at browsing and shopping And spotting predators which could harm young.
Men are better at forward vision good for hunting targeting weapons.
The apalling article inScientific American mag saying sexis a spectrum . Is very shocking. For TRUE Science see THE PARADOX ISTITUTE ON SEX/BIOLOGY. THIS IS A FUNDAMENTAL ATTACK ON HUMAN BIOLOGY AND SCIENCE.
If there are 73 genders what is the gender pay gap about?
Your program and your guests keep getting better and better. It's awesome how you go fearlessly after our most difficult social problems with a sense of humor and without ever seeming to have an axe to grind. Keep up the good work!
Wokes is distracting us for something bad, the agenda of Evil people are constructing robots, arctificial inteligence, hibrid syntetic human babies, brain chips, milions of smal satelites for orbit planet and block sun light. they hate God and hate that humans with love on heart mind can access God power to use mind to affect reality universe dimensions. aliens ETs and evil humans folow satanic agenda for technology and ignore the organic nature things in planet and in human body mind. so make a new thing that has no conection with laws of life and holy spirit of God, so let stop hate the attackers ideology religion politic etc , are distraction strategy, for us not tell anything for stop agenda of technology self destruction of human kind.
97% DNA is light and sound, 3% protein, but the world system tells is 100% protein only. for we did not discovery our God power of vibration in love for affect reality with mind.
This is why Jane Austen is so magnificent because she was the rare woman writer who can depict women as they are rather than as she wishes she was
That is both the good and the bad, as it should be for everyone.
A rare voice of reason. Thank you for making these great interviews Chris. The world needs this.
Wokes is distracting us for something bad, the agenda of Evil people are constructing robots, arctificial inteligence, hibrid syntetic human babies, brain chips, milions of smal satelites for orbit planet and block sun light. they hate God and hate that humans with love on heart mind can access God power to use mind to affect reality universe dimensions. aliens ETs and evil humans folow satanic agenda for technology and ignore the organic nature things in planet and in human body mind. so make a new thing that has no conection with laws of life and holy spirit of God, so let stop hate the attackers ideology religion politic etc , are distraction strategy, for us not tell anything for stop agenda of technology self destruction of human kind.
97% DNA is light and sound, 3% protein, but the world system tells is 100% protein only. for we did not discovery our God power of vibration in love for affect reality with mind.
Hi Chris,
I wanted to suggest having Charles Wheelan on your podcast. I'm reading his book "Naked Statistics" and it's been a game-changer for me. It's made me way better at thinking logically and opened my eyes to how much our world runs on data.
Now, I see things in a whole new light. I'm always thinking about the numbers behind smart decisions people make. And I've gotten really good at spotting and avoiding tricky statistical mistakes.
Strangely, I haven't found any good interviews with Wheelan out there. That's where you could come in. You're great at what you do, and I think you could showcase his genius. Plus, the book is funny too, which is a nice bonus.
Looking forward to hearing more from you.
Added this to my book list. Thanks for the suggestion!
@@HH_Julius It'll change your life.
Great suggestion, would be interested to hear it.
Thank you for the suggestion!
Wokes is distracting us for something bad, the agenda of Evil people are constructing robots, arctificial inteligence, hibrid syntetic human babies, brain chips, milions of smal satelites for orbit planet and block sun light. they hate God and hate that humans with love on heart mind can access God power to use mind to affect reality universe dimensions. aliens ETs and evil humans folow satanic agenda for technology and ignore the organic nature things in planet and in human body mind. so make a new thing that has no conection with laws of life and holy spirit of God, so let stop hate the attackers ideology religion politic etc , are distraction strategy, for us not tell anything for stop agenda of technology self destruction of human kind.
97% DNA is light and sound, 3% protein, but the world system tells is 100% protein only. for we did not discovery our God power of vibration in love for affect reality with mind.
I must live on another planet. Can't go anywhere with my wife until she has done a full-house search for her cellphone, keys and sunglasses. Stereotypes must exist for some reason, but I see so many exceptions I have to wonder what that reason might be?
She's great. These observations about how the scientific process is actually changing, is horrifying, frankly.
Women are communist censors at heart.
What a wonderful presentation. I’ve been an adjunct professor of psychology for 30 years. I have seen academia and the clinical professions become increasingly feminized, Jordan Peterson has addressed male and female personality differences much more eloquently that I can. We are now seeing this come to fruition.
Good, it will lose value and men will move on .
@@poocrayon4588 men have moved on. Now the women, will, too, because they won't have mates in college. Then all these idiot ideological brainwashing stations will either adapt or die. Can't wait, it should be soon.
Why adjunct for 30 years? Did you not want to be at least an associate professor or something?
@@counselorguy5481 if you must know. My adjunct status was related to military moves every 3 to 4 years. I’m a practicing clinician who was blessed to be offered part-time faculty positions at every location that I was stationed, undergraduate as well as graduate teaching.
I absolutely loved this interview. I've never heard a more clear and concise description of what is going on in the world today. This is very refreshing. They managed to eloquently bring up the topics that we all need to hear. And they kept it lighthearted and easy to take in. This is why I'm a constant fan of Chris Williamson, and now I'm a fan of Cory. This has been truly appreciated.
Have you ever watched the Honey Badger Radio @Badger Live Streams ?
Concerning truth, I recently rewatched an episode of _Star Trek: The Next Generation_ ("Rightful Heir") that handled it really well. I'll try to describe it as briefly as possible: one character, Liutenant Worf, discovers that a person he thought was the second coming of a legendary hero to the klingons was actually just a clone. First, he is asked to keep this secret from the current klingon leader, but decides to tell him the truth.
Then, while discussing the threat of a civil war between two factions - between those loyal to the current leader and those who would follow the legendary figure -, Worf comes with a compromising solution: to go public about the clone, with complete honesty about it, so that he (the clone) could be seen not as a second coming, but as a rightful heir to the old hero, allowing him to become an emperor - but with the current leader retaining all the actual power.
In other words, the episode revolves around the temptations of going along with a lie for supposedly good reasons, but Worf finds the best solution for everyone through standing firmly on the side of truth at every step. A really good message, well delivered.
Good point and great episode. Old star trek was the best. Correction. Is still the best
Wokes is distracting us for something bad, the agenda of Evil people are constructing robots, arctificial inteligence, hibrid syntetic human babies, brain chips, milions of smal satelites for orbit planet and block sun light. they hate God and hate that humans with love on heart mind can access God power to use mind to affect reality universe dimensions. aliens ETs and evil humans folow satanic agenda for technology and ignore the organic nature things in planet and in human body mind. so make a new thing that has no conection with laws of life and holy spirit of God, so let stop hate the attackers ideology religion politic etc , are distraction strategy, for us not tell anything for stop agenda of technology self destruction of human kind.
97% DNA is light and sound, 3% protein, but the world system tells is 100% protein only. for we did not discovery our God power of vibration in love for affect reality with mind.
Far too much of my politics was refined through TNG and DS9 lol, DS9 was so good at making the shallow stereotypes very fleshed out and deep.
Quark calling out the federations smug superior complex is still one of my favourite lines.
There's another TNG episode that I cannot ever remember the name of, that has a civilization that just replaces one race oppressing another every few hundred years, Which feels awfully relevant these days with concepts like collective white guilt or racial justice. There was a leader even explicitly claiming the other race *deserved* to be punished for the sins of their race.
Cool video, My relationship of 5 years ended a month ago. The love of my life decided to leave me, I really love her so much I can’t stop thinking about her, I’ve tried my very best to get her back in my life, but to no avail, I’m frustrated, I don’t see my life with anyone else. I’ve done my best to get rid of the thoughts of her, but I can’t, I don’t know why I’m saying this here, I really miss her and just can’t stop thinking about her.
Amazing, how did you get a spiritual counsellor, and how do i reach her?
Thank you for this valuable information, i just looked her up now online. impressive
Shut up please.
unfortunately my friend, once a woman has gone, it's over. There is nothing you can do to get her back. The only thing you can do is choose how you react. Hit the gym, hit work with double enthusiasm. Level up your skillset, work hard, be the best version of yourself.
You wont get her back by being needy. I know it's hard mate but give yourself say 6 months single. Absence can make the heart grow fonder but it is still possible she would have fully moved on by then....or not. Without the benefit of hearing both sides of why the relationship broke down I can't say much else except do more things that focus on YOU rather than her and if you still have any of her stuff at your place then box it up temporarily to remove any chance that you will be reminded on the days that you AREN'T thinking about her for a short time. That includes digital photos. Store them on an external HD and if things workout between you two later on then you can always retrieve them.
Goodluck!
OK, let's talk about academic culture. In 1977, I ran a number of random correlates as part of a social science research class at Syracuse. Random correlates. One hit pay dirt, and my professor got very excited. He wanted me to publish, and instructed me to "make up and explanation". It has only gotten exponentially worse. Regarding forbidden topics? The Leftist takeover of the mental health professions is now complete. #1. You may not suggest that children being mutilated is anything but "care". As a therapist, you can now lose your license for suggesting that kids grow out of gender dysphoria. They do. #2. You may not suggest that perennially claiming to be a victim is unhealthy. #3. You may not suggest that racism against white people, Jews, or Asians is racism. #4. You may not suggest that freedom of speech is a higher value than "not being offended". #5. You may not suggest that viewpoint diversity should be a part of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and God Forbid, should you point out that merit matters. Those are my five. Great discussion nonetheless.
The crazy thing is an egalitarian society is going to pave the way for authoritarian leadership that's savvy enough to take advantage of it.
The road to hell and all that
"So a lot of the biases that used to favor men now favor women, and a lot of the biases that always favored women still favor women." Dr. Robert Briffault spoke on this in his 1931 book, The Mothers: The Matriarchal Theory of Social Origins which I quoted on my channel, in stating that it is only when women have a position of leverage that you see such rebellious behavior.
This conversation is gold.
Not only for it's content, which would be enough, but also for the mutual respect, benelovense, the chemistry between them..
Will recommend to a friend, will view again.
And subscibed, of course.
The class thing in the UK is so real. I was always taught to talk correctly because my parents knew if I spoke with a strong accent I would find it hard to get a job. I can turn the accent on and off depending on who I'm with and what I'm doing. When I'm with friends, I'll use Geordie slang a lot, but when I'm working or speaking to someone from a different country or region, I drop the slang and speak proper English. I grew up working class, but I'm often called posh because of my accent.
Totally empathise with all of this coming from the NE, absolutely accurate
Better to be called posh than scary or ginger.😃
In the states we have a similar experience, inner city ebonics and strong country (especially southern country or mountain) accents can be a serious social networking and career/business limiter, but in particular circumstances, like asking for directions or other help from another lower class person it's helpful to switch your accent back on.
Good. You should speak correctly
Were you one of the Spice Girls?
Cory looked a little nervous at times (I’d imagine I’d be nervous too). The home team roots for both you and Chris!
Didn't sound nervous at all (listening on double speed while doing other things), if that's any consolation & you're reading this, Cory!
yes, she needed to slow down a bit in my estimation.
@@gratiaDei777 She definitely sounded nervous after Chris would question her on her previous statements and studies.
It's obvious that she has a crush on Chris😂 she couldn't help herself but giggle like a highschool girl at times 😂
The academics are chalk full of the gatekeeping and self interest people that can effect others being stone walled in funds of your research and your work getting published. Last couple years its been well understood that if you want to get published in order to get funding, you acquiesce to the liberal hiveminds. Guess how that's been working out.
I worked for the federal government for forty years, retiring in 2016. Women were so disadvantaged that whenever a colleague would tell me of a new high level hire I would ask, "What's her name?" It was all women, all the time.
Great interview. It's telling that this academic is the one who "can" do this research. JBP has been talking about this for years, and he is persona non grata in academia, despite a stellar career in research, teaching and as a practicing psychologist. All the better if more people start dealing with this. Cheers.
Wokes is distracting us for something bad, the agenda of Evil people are constructing robots, arctificial inteligence, hibrid syntetic human babies, brain chips, milions of smal satelites for orbit planet and block sun light. they hate God and hate that humans with love on heart mind can access God power to use mind to affect reality universe dimensions. aliens ETs and evil humans folow satanic agenda for technology and ignore the organic nature things in planet and in human body mind. so make a new thing that has no conection with laws of life and holy spirit of God, so let stop hate the attackers ideology religion politic etc , are distraction strategy, for us not tell anything for stop agenda of technology self destruction of human kind.
97% DNA is light and sound, 3% protein, but the world system tells is 100% protein only. for we did not discovery our God power of vibration in love for affect reality with mind.
She’s still getting hate for it tbh
If men were allowed to study this and not lose all face and potentially those they love, we would have, god bless her for doing this work.
Loved this!! She's fantastic. Keep up the good work Cory it's direly needed! Truth matters, its how we get better.
It's how we get better and how we stay competitive.
Wokes is distracting us for something bad, the agenda of Evil people are constructing robots, arctificial inteligence, hibrid syntetic human babies, brain chips, milions of smal satelites for orbit planet and block sun light. they hate God and hate that humans with love on heart mind can access God power to use mind to affect reality universe dimensions. aliens ETs and evil humans folow satanic agenda for technology and ignore the organic nature things in planet and in human body mind. so make a new thing that has no conection with laws of life and holy spirit of God, so let stop hate the attackers ideology religion politic etc , are distraction strategy, for us not tell anything for stop agenda of technology self destruction of human kind.
97% DNA is light and sound, 3% protein, but the world system tells is 100% protein only. for we did not discovery our God power of vibration in love for affect reality with mind.
How could we possibly think that protecting people's feelings is more important than the pursuit of truth? 😅 I think one of the main purposes of life is the pursuit of truth!
There is also the argument that I've heard from Jordan Peterson that this female primacy of care is valid and necessary for the first few years of our lives, but AFTER that period can quickly become toxic, if it isn't reigned in enough by a primacy on individual challenge and boundary-setting. The demonization of the male has unleashed the dark mother on our entire culture.
The overbearing mother is the term i believe he uses
Great video Chris, and Cory. Thank you for having this conversation publicly. This is terrifying! It sounds like the questions of science, and academia have to be answered with the same delicacy as "Do I look fat in these pants?" We are well, and truly fucked if it does continue in this direction (as all indicators seem to show it will)
People like Dr. Cory Clark actually give me some hope that all is not lost. I've also noticed that Chris has a real knack for finding and interviewing amazing, intelligent, beautiful and engaging women- NOT a criticism, I'm just jealous! I could talk to Dr. Cory or Louise Perry for hours, they're just that fascinating and enchanting!
So, I'm curious, why does beauty matter when women speak, but not men? And why do you think that might be an issue of why there are a lot of fights with women and men in workplaces when a completely arbitrary value for practicality is counted for one side over the other.
@@OpticalArxenal first sentence is false.
I saw some news articles a few years ago that celebrated the results of research studies showing that women had caught up to men in IQ measurements even though the measurements had shown IQ had dropped across the board.
Like the American, Australian and Canadian research in the 90's that identified 70% of abusers are women, that disappeared under the campus rug. Or that 80's research that after redefining domestic violence to include yelling proclaimed children from "domestic violence" environments were deemed to be at risk of the father. There were a lot of women who played that card in the family court and not only gained custody of their children but were able to block access and in many many cases poisoned the relationships. Millions of children throughout the west grew up fatherless. Even today 40 years later between 50 and 60% of young men in our maximum security prisons were raised without a substantive male in their lives. How many father's took their own lives because of the loss of their children's love. It was 22 years later that this academics paper was reviewed by a student and the major flaws were highlighted. The study was again undertaken and the conclusion was that children other than in exceptional circumstances were not at risk. Efforts to correct the lie have delivered few fair results for men, especially for men who blindly walk back in to an abusive relationship on the belief as conveyed to them by society it was all their fault.
The price when influential people are able to create a social construct on campus by simply changing the meaning of a word then turn it on society. Haven't we ignored that piece of repeating history long enough? The 5% do not equste to the whole ! Even today there are many fabricated social constructs that people cannot see and you won't because speech that effects perception is now controlled by nothing more than controlled silence. For the abuse buffs that's called Invalidation.
Most custody is settled out of court and in the majority both parties mutually agree that the children should stay with the mother. Most men don't want to look after their kids.
If in the marriage the woman does all of the childcare, why wouldn't she in the divorce?
Also 70% of abusers are woman? You are gonna need to site the source for that. Do you have a link to this study ?
@@wyleecoyotee4252 Yeah but that's a slanted result from the get go. Why would men bother even pushing for 50/50 custody if all the results of the courts overwhelming favor women. Most lawyers advise men to NOT go to court for exactly that reason.
If it was simply just childcare you'd have a point but the issue is the child support that gets allocated relative to the mans income. You'll have a family and the cost of kids will be a few hundred bucks a month for food and upkeep but then the divorce happens and all of a sudden the guy whos making 100k a year, now has to pay 30k+ in child support and there's no auditing process for how any of the money is spent. If there's any shot for a guy to be able to just hand over some money and buy the kids stuff they need, instead of the court setting that (they take a cut) then it will nearly always be the preferred option.
@@theperfectbeing
Most lawyers don't tell them men that they can fight for their kids and get them, even at 50/,50
18:13 as a man, i once used my phone flashlight to look for my phone in the dark for 5 straight minutes
Its fascinating to me (under this new order of gender sameness) that men will literally go to war or fight criminals on the street without many people paying much attention to their oppression or asking where the equal-in-capacity women are to help them.
Or the inequality of most really tough jobs. Look at the workers doing hard work and it's mostly men. How come feminists aren't talking about this form of inequality?
Well said!
I am confused - we have female soldiers and cops, I live in a major city and see them all the time.
@@apopuffkin1717they are still a minority like in the USA women soldiers are 1/7 of the whole military
@@markbennett5812 Since we don't conscript in the US - joining is on a volunteer basis, all I can cleave from those numbers is that men like war more than most women? But, if we had a draft for any reason in the future, I do think we need to revisit the rules on who is drafted - as I don't think gender should be a factor, but other factors should be considered regardless of whether the draftee is male or female.
This was such an insightful and eye opening discussion. In a previous job i ran a large team with a very diverse mix of people (women/men/cultural backgrounds). While in the role i spent so much time having to be the mediator and definitely looking back i never realized how much of the mediation was being required because of men vs women way of thinking. Amazing insight.
It's the biggest divide in our world. The left has been captured by the women about 30 years ago and they drive everyone nuts.
You mean, like men thinking they have to dominate everything?
I was in a relationship several years ago.
She slapped me really hard on my arm when we were in public.
I ended that 4 year relationship in 10 seconds.
No person male or female should take abuse.
I used to have a pro female bias but the way women act now has pretty much made that go away.
[Nuanced, intelligent, and valuabe comment everyone likes]
[Not nuanced and simplistic response that will cause this to have 100 replies in 1 hour]
This is some stellar cope. Keep it up!
@@sir0nion[all caps triggered lash full of accusations of racism, sexism and psychopathy]
[Simping over how you have delivered the best comment ever, made my day, random emojis and other garbled nonsense]
[annoying person who wrongly interprets the 2nd comment and r/wooshes to try to appear cool]
Sadly it's the "narcissistic mother" - "the mother" more self-centered and concerned with their own virtue signaling than with anything related to the "truth" of things.
Facts over feelings. It's terrifying that good scientific data will be overlooked because of who it may "harm", especially when that harm may not even exist but in someone's mind... I hope more scientists, scholars, and people in general will gain the courage to speak up on what is real rather than what is PC. I hope that the public will stop pushing agendas that only further divide themselves. Good things happen when people work together, promote civil discourse !
That is more common in soft sciences like psychology. In stem hard sciences, women are there because they are nerds. None of us are studying protein structure to “save the world”, we do it because it’s cool and that’s it.
Calling a bit of science "harm", because it might be a bit shocking to some uptight 18y/o sensibilities, is so degrading to people who have to deal with real psychological harm, like victims of sex trafficking, veterans with PTSD.
Excellent interview, excellent guest. Makes me think of all the things JP has been saying about the state of modern academia and the ways in which women/lefitsts have the institutions by the short and curlies
Wokes is distracting us for something bad, the agenda of Evil people are constructing robots, arctificial inteligence, hibrid syntetic human babies, brain chips, milions of smal satelites for orbit planet and block sun light. they hate God and hate that humans with love on heart mind can access God power to use mind to affect reality universe dimensions. aliens ETs and evil humans folow satanic agenda for technology and ignore the organic nature things in planet and in human body mind. so make a new thing that has no conection with laws of life and holy spirit of God, so let stop hate the attackers ideology religion politic etc , are distraction strategy, for us not tell anything for stop agenda of technology self destruction of human kind.
97% DNA is light and sound, 3% protein, but the world system tells is 100% protein only. for we did not discovery our God power of vibration in love for affect reality with mind.
I know a lot of the information discussed here was about men vs women, and that may in fact be crucial, but if you just read Intellectuals and Society by Thomas Sowell (and I have heard he says the same things in The Vision of the Annointed and The Quest for Cosmic Justice), many of the points you two are emphasizing are elucidated very clearly.
Specifically, the point about the fact that if the wellbeing of the disadvantaged were truly the main concern of those who share the anointed vision (wokeism and proto wokeism), then their main activity would be trying to ascertain what helps the downtrodden, and first and foremost, they would find that markets and commerce help the poor of all countries across the world, but they don't look into it at all empirically.
The main historical proponents of the vision of the anointed have all been men going back to the late 17th century, but that's because only men wrote like that back then. This vision began taking over large swathes of American legal thought on federal court decisions starting in the 1920s and 30s, and it was still all men back then. The women thing may speed it up, but they have been on the rise for a very long time now.
A much needed conversation.
“THEY” have destroyed the work environment and this is only the beginning
The bias in psychology research explains a lot on why I can't find much on relational aggression and female bullying. I think it's something that deserves more attention. I have a hypothesis that majority of women sabotage each other through gossip and reputation damage because of how social media has driven us to compete. But, because it isn't obvious, it doesn't get the attention it deserves. It's like feminism has unlocked an era of entitled mean girls who avoid accountability by feigning innocence and acting oppressed.
Look up ‘female anti-social behavior’ That is the general field of study.
Why do you feel the need to bring in feminism into this? You think that before women got rights to vote this same problem did not exist...? Because it most certaintly did, men also used gossip and rumours in high society to "bring down" opponents, of course men had other weapons, women had only that.
It was a fellow female who was my chief tormentor for years in late elementary and junior high; I never had any problems with the boys. You are very much on to something.
When feelings and mob rule take over you end up with wonderful gems like the Salem Witch Trials. Believe all emotional women!
At 36 min I concur with her point. Knowing what is real and true allows us to avoid harm... when prompted, chris said, "Oh, well, yes obviously."
I could see she was trying to steer him to say "avoid harm" but as a guy I could also see that "the sports called Science is about exactitude and distinguishing correct from incorrect".
What's really interesting is that women have a tendency of focusing on inductive reasoning and experience. This means that they have a larger base of common-sense about the environments that they are currently within. Whereas men focus more on deductive reasoning, which acts as a "true function" which allows for an accurate understanding of the world.
Long stories oversimplify, women are good at determining the most valuable (cost/benefit) environments to be in, and men tend to analyze and alter so that they can make environments more valuable (less cost/more benefit). Effectively this means that women help induce survival for our species, and men help induced thriving for our species.
Donald Hoffman's theorem on "fitness beats truth" demonstrates that a little bit of delusion is actually more beneficial for a species to survive, than a strict adherence to the truth.
I suspect that we as a species are sexually dimorphic (men and women are different) in order to allow us to *survive* and *thrive,* when working in harmony together.
The protection from harm is a threshold issue. Knowing the truth is actually less beneficial in general. But, for specific cases that are above a generalized threshold, the truth becomes more vital. It's a lot like... Perfection being the enemy of good. Generalized information, common sense, that would be good enough for everyday survival. And perfect would be the fundamental truth of the world.
Common Sense covers the general, and Truth covers the abnormal and extraneous things. It's the good enough versus the 12-page analyzation.
1.) Women take a good enough, how is everyone feeling today? kind of attitude.
2.) Whereas men tend towards a methodical and detailed 12-page explanation on the ins-and-outs of how that is done properly... And when done properly the steps to take to properly finish, if environmental properties elicit a blah blah blah blah blah.....
Saw some studies of why very few women are conservative in their views when it comes to voting. This is playing out some of those reasons. Very interesting. We're a lot of men are more interested in freedom at any cost.
I have two STEM graduate degrees and am a published scientist (biology and engineering). I was raised to have analytical conversations at the dinner table and was always purely naturally curious about observing science and nature. I devoured books on weather and wrote my own picture guide book on cloud species in middle school, observed and identified the protists in the water in my mom's potted plants in a microscope, and desperately built things that could fly (kites, planes, parachutes) around my neighborhood. I explored being a human intellect and experience with pure humility and curiosity, which was, quite characteristically, not engendered, but ultimately human. In fact, I remember how the silliness of the societal guy/girl thing in middle school starting and how boring it was! I always had a strong rebellious propensity to trust myself in the amidst the crowd and I'm glad a stuck with my passion.
I guess you are a woman. Only a woman would feel the need to tell everyone how good they think they are. No man would post a comment like yours.
I hear you. The point of all our progress is to allow people to be what they’re best at and love and quit telling people they have to be this or that. Not saying anyone is what they clearly aren’t.
I would love to see Cory Clark and Jordan Peterson have a long discussion.
He references the studies about more equal societies (SCandinavian) having greater gender differences a lot.
@@realistic_delinquent Can you please tell me more about what you mean by this? I mostly agree with Jordan but he is flawed as well. I'm just curious of what you think and where this comes from. I'm not trying to argue with you, btw. I'm only asking to understand. :)
This whole episode is a great defense of the complementarity of men and women. We need both of these perspectives, approaches to work in harmony.
Oh, I love that you had Cory on! Great episode 👍
I live in New Zealand. We have Maori and also Pacific Island groups. They do not do as well in society as the Indians and the Asians. I was thinking about this and I am of the belief that different cultures exhibit different traits. The Asian and Indian groups know the real value of money and saving, and investing, and investing in their childrens education and the importance of a cohesive family unit. I am sure this is why the Indian and Asian groups are much more sucessful in our western society.
I was reminded when she was talking about so many of the Uni progressives being upper class, well educated white women, of the punk scene back in the 70’s, 80’s and 90’s. An overwhelming majority of the American punk groups came from Orange County California. Which is a super well to do area of America. Something to think on.
Huntington Beach too, very nice area.
The thing about this trend in academia (if you can even still call it that) is that it promotes and creates total dysfunction of the subject (any subject) it infects. The discipline of history has been being affected for perhaps the longest because it was an avenue to attack for getting women more control of academia to begin with.
This is fascinating! It’s changing my thoughts about so much! Thank you for this, very different conversation!
Dr Clark is the ultimate interview subject. She is incredibly smart, well informed, quick thinking, cheerful, funny, relaxed, a great conversationalist, thoughtful and a lovely person. amazingly great ! This was an excellent UA-cam. I learned quite a lot.
This was soooo good. Wow you two. I really appreciate what guy said here around 45 min in about the equalization of the sexes hurting women. I'm 40 & I've watched it decline slowly my whole adult life. It almost reversed too much. Like if you are abused, you must have deserved it. It's definitely had a horrible impact & it's something I've thought or talked about many times. Like if things had happened a decade or 2 earlier how differently it would have been. I see a shift so much to the opposite a lot of popular people even, act as if there are no abused women & they're all lying & all men are great. Only women mess them up... It's like the twilight zone. Am I the only one hearing this stuff more & more? All the one sex is all good and one is all bad. It's like this is how victims (real ones) stay victims. It really needs to be course correctly strongly. We're a lost society. I see men defending the worst of women if they defend anyone. Take for example that woman on the American Airlines flight. Actual crazy women who PRETEND to be victims get the help or defense. But real victims? Pfft you deserved it (when you never once did). I feel like I should be 80 or 90 to see society change SO much in SUCH a short time. Imo everything really changed quicker after Obama was elected. I voted for him twice. He did promise change. Anyway, thanks for doing this. Really much needed. Wondering if you have some like this on psychopaths & sociopaths. Subbed!
I haven't finished watching yet. I've liked most of what Cory has said, however, as a woman who worked as a Sessional Academic for a School of Psychology in a university, I had no problem with giving undergraduate students low marks or failing them, but the marking criterias were designed to pass everyone. They had to write complete gibberish for us to be able to fail them. I was even asked to remark some assignments because my average mark was too low. The marking criterias were designed by men too.
Edit: I'm also egalitarian, so if you do equally as well as another student on the assignment, you should get the same high grade. But if your assignment was rubbish, I don't think you should get the same high grade just because you submitted the assignment. I think there are different definitions of egalitarianism, and believing that all people deserve equal treatment doesn't mean that you feel that a criminal should enjoy the freedom of an innocent person, for example. It means that two people who commit the same crime should receive the same sentence, regardless of class, gender, race, etc.
Coming back to the university and assignment marks example, universities are not really designed for teaching people. They're businesses, and there's an incentive to pass students and get them through degrees so that the university continues to get money out of them. Individual academics can be very caring people and actually care about their students, but they get pressured by the higher ups to implement things that they don't necessarily want to.
I know this whole episode was on more than just this point, but I just wanted to add my two cents about it. Oh, and other female Sessionals also wanted to fail students hahah. To be clear, the quality of students' work is pretty bad.
Its really frustrating that you dont put links to her research in the description.
I can't wait to find a woman that will make me a house husband. I'm so done with working and being a strong and independent man
Try smiling more
@@wyleecoyotee4252 thanks for the advice, I'll try that 🙂
My partner liked it, but we only needed him to do it for a few years until they got into school. After that he worked part time for few years while they were in school, so he could be out of work in time to pick them up from school. He also trained for MMA at the time and had a few fights. At the time, I was working 10-12 hour days building my career, so without his sacrifice we would not be doing as well as we are now. He's now about to try his hand as a professional bowler!
@@apopuffkin1717 awesome...but I'm trying not to get a black eye fighting grow men, while raising kids...who might give me a black eye
@@michaelmichaelsjr.1352 Fair. I only mentioned his training MMA to illustrate that he still had time to pursue some of his interests/goals while being a SAHD, which was one of the reasons he enjoyed the arrangement.
1:19:55
The people who say spreading negative stereotypes is shameful / harmful
behaviour typically haven't interacted with those that the stereotype is of
I worked in a place that was almost 50% vietnamese and almost 50% Sicilian
(which was hell on my back, being 6'2" - all the benches were so low)
The stuff they would say to each other was hilarious (and would be utterly
condemned by the people who condemn spreading of negative stereotypes)
- ugh, they're all so-and-so, Australia would be so much better if we didn't let
them in (from 1st generation immigrants 🤣), etc, etc
If you just read a transcript of what was said during any given day, you'd think
they detested each other
If you looked at how they interacted (including the way in which they said these
things to each other) you'd see the clear love they had for each other
I wish there was a portal I could step through to see that. Did you ever partake in the volley? It reminds me of how my brother and I relate to each other. Well, I tend to volley more insults than he does, but he appreciates a good zinger. He was talking in a group that involved two of our cousins, one of which is studying Spanish informally. My brother said that he spews mierde del toro in Spanish. He translated it for the non-Spanish-studying cousin (which, in case anyone who reads this needs help) as bullshit, and that cousin said, "Oh, just like when you speak English." My brother still laughs about that one.
Employment bias flipped around 2009? It flipped a hell of a lot earlier than that. Women were being explicitly headhunted way back in the 1980s. Look for the appearance of the words "women and minorities are particularly encouraged to apply" in job ads.
Podcast number 665. Next one should be an interesting revelation.
34:40 These are good questions and Chris is having a hard time answering them. I'm sitting here almost yelling at my screen that it relates to provision and protection. If we're out trying to bring in resources for our survival, we need accurate information about those resources and the methods of collecting them. Likewise, if a lot of people are suddenly falling ill, we need accurate information about what's causing that. If there is a sudden flood, do we want accurate information about what needs to be done and who needs to do it? Or do we want to grab as many people as possible and put on a show of them 'working' equitably to dig a trench just anywhere. Show the members passing buckets along a line to nowhere just so everyone feels involved? That DOESN'T WORK!
I am a female Scientist and I can say that both myself and my female colleagues were interested in finding the truth regardless of whether it could be used for good or not. That is the purpose of Science and an inquiring mind. Science is the pursuit of truth.
Lol
It should be, but unfortunately, the truth, according to the funding source, is how things are really done.
Why did you write "were"? Have your goals changed?
@@markaurelius61 still no answer because its all lip service. thats how bad things have become, women fucked up so much in the past 50 years to the point male do not trust them at all.
Great job Chris and Cory. You both made a sensitive subject light and humorous.
Wokes is distracting us for something bad, the agenda of Evil people are constructing robots, arctificial inteligence, hibrid syntetic human babies, brain chips, milions of smal satelites for orbit planet and block sun light. they hate God and hate that humans with love on heart mind can access God power to use mind to affect reality universe dimensions. aliens ETs and evil humans folow satanic agenda for technology and ignore the organic nature things in planet and in human body mind. so make a new thing that has no conection with laws of life and holy spirit of God, so let stop hate the attackers ideology religion politic etc , are distraction strategy, for us not tell anything for stop agenda of technology self destruction of human kind.
97% DNA is light and sound, 3% protein, but the world system tells is 100% protein only. for we did not discovery our God power of vibration in love for affect reality with mind.