Hey bruh, just seeing if you understand that anti-magic and magic aren't even touching? Ichika stated the anti-magic was intertwined with their magic, which means they're entangled. Particles or energy that are entangled don't touch at all, but behave the same. That's why the anti-magic isn't getting erased. It needs to have contact with the magic to erase it, which isn't happening w/ the BBs. IRL physics it's called quantam entanglement which is when sub atomic articles (like photons or even electrons and so on) exhibit the same behavior as particles they're don't physically touch. So they're linked in behavior over some distance, but, physically they don't touch. So the anti-magic is functioning more like a cloak that's separated from the magic by sub-aromic distances, but share the same behavior, but if you remove the entanglement, then it gets erased. Hopefully that clears things up.
Do you mean like it's cloaking it without touching it? If so, I won't have that many issues. The problem is that Tabata never specified, with his poor explanation, thats where all the problem start. Your argument of AM cloaking magic without touching it seems interesting, but how do they still retained the attribute shouldn't it be negate and Tabata explanation just doesn't work for me. Thanks for you comment, though!
@NobuKage404 No worries, and yes, it's cloaking it without touching it that's what it means when particles are entangled. So in the raws Ichika actually makes the distinction and says Asta's "anti-magic power" which are the black spiky round particles you see flowing in Asta in chapter 339. In the raws term used was "anti magic power" 「反魔力 anchi maryoku」not anti magic 「反魔法 Anchi Mahō」 which is different from psuedo'-anti Magic 「擬似的に反魔法 Giji anchi Mahō」 anti-magic is one application of anti-magic power, but not the only application. Much like how you can use magic power without using actual magic/spells. For example in chapter 225 page 11, Finral states Gadja is floating without using magic. In chapter 341, page 8, Asta says none Iof the Ryuzen were using magic/yojutsu despite the fact they were using yoryoku/magical power. But unfortunately viz often translate anchi maryoku (anti-magic power) as just anti-magic as just "anti-magic" for shorthand which sometimes causes confusion. Anti-magic power are the particles that power anti-magic while magic power (which is created from mana) powers magic/spells But because the anti-magic power is entangled in this case, it follows the behavior of the magic, as in it mimics it since they're linked to it, withour touching it. Also attributes are derived from your mana infinity, which is a property of your magical power. Ichika states the AMP (anti-magic power) is intertwining with their properties so no it wouldn't erase it, because it isn't touching it, instead it's follow its behavior so if it a fire property, it will behave like anti-magic costing of fire ect. You might have overlooked this one key factor so no worries, but one of anti-magic power inherent properties is that it's drawn to magic power, as in it has a tendency to chase down mana and erase it because its attracted to it (chapter 97 page 15. But if you entangle it, it's essentially chasing down the mana without touching it, kind of like an entrapment.
@@NobuKage404bro, I'll be honest,I recommend to you the video of Broku explaining anti magic and why all of what happened with the black bulls make sense, it's an 4 month old video, it's name is something like "You do not understand anti magic"
Wakanda for ever as little boy
Lmaooo Don't forget to subscribe!!
Hey bruh, just seeing if you understand that anti-magic and magic aren't even touching?
Ichika stated the anti-magic was intertwined with their magic, which means they're entangled. Particles or energy that are entangled don't touch at all, but behave the same. That's why the anti-magic isn't getting erased. It needs to have contact with the magic to erase it, which isn't happening w/ the BBs.
IRL physics it's called quantam entanglement which is when sub atomic articles (like photons or even electrons and so on) exhibit the same behavior as particles they're don't physically touch. So they're linked in behavior over some distance, but, physically they don't touch.
So the anti-magic is functioning more like a cloak that's separated from the magic by sub-aromic distances, but share the same behavior, but if you remove the entanglement, then it gets erased.
Hopefully that clears things up.
Do you mean like it's cloaking it without touching it? If so, I won't have that many issues. The problem is that Tabata never specified, with his poor explanation, thats where all the problem start. Your argument of AM cloaking magic without touching it seems interesting, but how do they still retained the attribute shouldn't it be negate and Tabata explanation just doesn't work for me. Thanks for you comment, though!
@NobuKage404
No worries, and yes, it's cloaking it without touching it that's what it means when particles are entangled. So in the raws Ichika actually makes the distinction and says Asta's "anti-magic power" which are the black spiky round particles you see flowing in Asta in chapter 339. In the raws term used was "anti magic power" 「反魔力 anchi maryoku」not anti magic 「反魔法 Anchi Mahō」 which is different from psuedo'-anti Magic 「擬似的に反魔法 Giji anchi Mahō」 anti-magic is one application of anti-magic power, but not the only application. Much like how you can use magic power without using actual magic/spells. For example in chapter 225 page 11, Finral states Gadja is floating without using magic. In chapter 341, page 8, Asta says none Iof the Ryuzen were using magic/yojutsu despite the fact they were using yoryoku/magical power. But unfortunately viz often translate anchi maryoku (anti-magic power) as just anti-magic as just "anti-magic" for shorthand which sometimes causes confusion. Anti-magic power are the particles that power anti-magic while magic power (which is created from mana) powers magic/spells
But because the anti-magic power is entangled in this case, it follows the behavior of the magic, as in it mimics it since they're linked to it, withour touching it. Also attributes are derived from your mana infinity, which is a property of your magical power. Ichika states the AMP (anti-magic power) is intertwining with their properties so no it wouldn't erase it, because it isn't touching it, instead it's follow its behavior so if it a fire property, it will behave like anti-magic costing of fire ect.
You might have overlooked this one key factor so no worries, but one of anti-magic power inherent properties is that it's drawn to magic power, as in it has a tendency to chase down mana and erase it because its attracted to it (chapter 97 page 15. But if you entangle it, it's essentially chasing down the mana without touching it, kind of like an entrapment.
@@NobuKage404bro, I'll be honest,I recommend to you the video of Broku explaining anti magic and why all of what happened with the black bulls make sense, it's an 4 month old video, it's name is something like "You do not understand anti magic"
Can you make one on Berzerk
I have different video ideas, but it's coming later!