What is NASA’s RS-25 Rocket Engine?

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 40

  • @ASTROphanatic
    @ASTROphanatic  2 роки тому +4

    What is your thoughts on the RS-25 Rocket Engine? A new RS-25 Rocket engine is estimated to cost 146 million dollars according to a recent report. It is also important to note that the 452 seconds of specific impulse is in a vacuum and the specific impulse at sea level is about 366 seconds for the RS-25 rocket engine.

    • @Souleater17722
      @Souleater17722 Рік тому

      The weather

    • @LeftOverMacNCheese
      @LeftOverMacNCheese Рік тому

      Engine soo expensive and complex NASA have to scavage the museum to put it in their SLS rocket

    • @deanos32
      @deanos32 11 місяців тому

      It is extremely expensive for a (currently) expendable engine. It feels like Nasa should’ve invent a new rocket engine, instead of using ~50 year old technology for it.

    • @imacaryay7628
      @imacaryay7628 5 місяців тому

      ​@deanos32 takes a long time for a new design to get certified for a human pay load so they went with the design that already works

  • @Illuminwhy
    @Illuminwhy Рік тому +11

    Community: let’s stick rs-25 to an f1 car

  • @alexvega5756
    @alexvega5756 Рік тому +32

    Ahh yes good ol black ops theme on a NASA video. Subbed.

  • @heliofernandes7799
    @heliofernandes7799 24 дні тому

    This looks like the engine that’s in the back of Futurama spaceship

  • @jameskelly3502
    @jameskelly3502 11 місяців тому +7

    Fun Fact: The refurbishment after every flight was largly a safety measure.
    Recent tests of the RS-25, for SLS, demonstrated that they couldve been used 10+ times without refurbishment.
    An excellent, if under appreciated, design.

    • @6desk
      @6desk 6 місяців тому

      nope. wrong.

    • @shard8285
      @shard8285 4 місяці тому

      ​@@6desk source?

  • @ralphangel561
    @ralphangel561 Рік тому +2

    Wish they would launch Artemis already

  • @PhillipJFry69420
    @PhillipJFry69420 6 місяців тому +1

    73:1 thrust ratio “decent” 😂🤣🤣

  • @afrociaal8073
    @afrociaal8073 Рік тому +2

    So they took off the space shuttle and called it the SLS, im gettin’ iPhone 13 & 14 vibes…

    • @ggez8117
      @ggez8117 Рік тому

      Ok so, the core stage is quite literally brand new, not even close to a redesign from the shuttle external tanks, the engine even tho they have flown on the shuttle, that will only be the case for the first four missions, as they are building brand new engines (simpler to manufacture and modernized) for future missions

  • @A..T..M..
    @A..T..M.. 2 роки тому +5

    Awesome

    • @ASTROphanatic
      @ASTROphanatic  2 роки тому +4

      It is awesome that you have watched my video! Thank you so much for that! Also don't forget to like and subscribe!

  • @Discoveringme123
    @Discoveringme123 Місяць тому

    COD BABY

  • @Paxton_reynolds
    @Paxton_reynolds 6 місяців тому

    I like the call of duty music 😂

  • @jenniferjuniper12
    @jenniferjuniper12 6 місяців тому

    That is an insane cost for a launch!

  • @sufiyan2682
    @sufiyan2682 7 місяців тому +1

    Meanwhile india doing mars missions on Hollywood movies budget

  • @majhamontage7776
    @majhamontage7776 Рік тому +2

    Amazing

  • @eduardofg7356
    @eduardofg7356 9 місяців тому

    Hi, I'm an aeronautical engineer and I looking for an speaker for a webinar, subject, rocket engines. If you are able to help us, I will give more details. Thanks

  • @papimulatto492
    @papimulatto492 9 місяців тому

    Will it fit in a Miata 👀

  • @seventone4039
    @seventone4039 2 роки тому +2

    Its a Dinosaur 1 Trick pony, use once and its gone

    • @ASTROphanatic
      @ASTROphanatic  2 роки тому +4

      Thank you for watching the video! The RS-25 is very expensive and is outdated now in the year 2022, especially compared to rockets engines such as the SpaceX Raptor engine. Make sure to like and subscribe, since I will be making more videos like this one.

    • @tutorials1978
      @tutorials1978 Рік тому +3

      Straight up wrong.
      The rs-25 is still easily the most advanced rocket engine in the world, capable of self pressurizing its oxidizer and fuel tank by using a combination of staged combustion fuel rich cycle to power the main pumps and an expander bleed to power the low pressure pumps.
      Also, 1 trick pony?? Have you heard of the ar-22?? 10 test in 10 days with minimal refurbishment, you might be thinking "ohh but thats the ar-22, not the rs-25!!11", the ar-22 was literally built from leftover rs-25 parts

    • @seventone4039
      @seventone4039 Рік тому +1

      @@tutorials1978 Hydrogen is a thing of the past. Shuttle and SLS are showing the countless problens with it. If Starship becomes operational, nobody can afford such old Dinosaur engines, espacially if the Rocket is not reusable. Times have changed.

    • @tutorials1978
      @tutorials1978 Рік тому

      Of course! the most efficient fuel is a thing of the past

    • @tutorials1978
      @tutorials1978 Рік тому

      also the 40 million / 140 million price tags are wrong, nobody outsides of Aerojet actually knows the price for each engine

  • @RedSn0wBroadCast
    @RedSn0wBroadCast 9 місяців тому

    Love the Black Ops menu background music choice 🫡