Iraq and Iran should be amongst the wealthiest countries in the world. Instead the vast oil wealth of both has been squandered on wars, weapons and hatred.
***** Did you read what I wrote? Saddam, yes. But not Iran. Dont blame Iran. Iran was simply a victim of Saddam and Iran defended itself with honour. And Iran is very well advanced FOR the odds against it. 90% of the limitations of Iran and Iraq is because of the US because US sanctioned us. So dont say that we're limited. You dont know jack shit if you believe that.
Iran does not own anything , These people all were and are still people of Persian Empire, Baghdad was Persias capital once in the history. I believe we should all be united and hold the security of the region together, no need for foreign people to come here and eat our food that there will be less food for the people of this region, I hope USA and Europeans find proper jobs for their men and women insted of making murdurers of them. And I hope for the people of my region to eat less animals and become vegeterian so that they dont act like animals, of course for the americans and europeans I have the same wish.
@@ggggggg4327 Iraq was never a part of persian and will never be, Iraq had its own empires long before persia. Iraq much older then the city of Baghdad before arabic and persian. Iraq belong to the iraqi people with aramic and babylonen origin, Sumerian, Akkad, Assyrian. Persian just invaded the country before, and arab came after.
Iraqi foreign minister says we don't want any big power to interfere in this war, while he is benefiting from both Soviet and American tactical, informational and weaponry aid during the whole 8 years of this war!
Everybody tried stay out of this conflict, until crazy Khomaini decided to invade Israel through Iraq, the first 2 years when Iraq had the upper hand the West was helping Iran.
@@Radwandez My point is that there were two crazy dictator in Iran and Iraq, Saddam wanted to be the only Arabs leader and unit them under his leadership, Khomeini wanted to export his revolution to other countries and create a shiait islamic empire. So victory of any of them would be a disaster for the region and world.
@@SyntheticSan and remeber Sadam was close friend to western country like last king of Iran...they chew them like chewing gum and spitting them when needed.
Joey Davies Spell his name for us then. And did you had a childhood friend named sadam like i did? The man won't try to play with fire if he was that smart. He was arrogant and out of touch. you don't mess with super powers until you get power. Sadam commited political suicide with his arrogance and thought he was invisible. You mess with Petro-dollar and they over throw you.
Monster samator shut up Iran gate western still use iran untill now there is now truly adversity between western And iran And saddam was nationalist who defend his country from Iran expansive ambitions
@@peshpeshabdulla Why you talking out of your ass? Your such a dumbass iran is the only country that doesnt work with israel. All the other so called muslim countries dont do shit.
History will repeat ,those who don't learn, will pay for it ,iran and iraq until they have mullah and until UK exist will be the same and nothing will be changed,,British are taking advantage of stupid common pepole who ,,if they want change they should put religion in the bin and face the reality, not allah says this allah says that
I'm a child of Iranians, and even I feel bad for the tragedy which has befallen Iraq. We're not talking about a poor, chaotic country. Iraq was rich and modern.
Thank you man I respect that, instead of the others talking about some shit. In my opinion as well I think Iran was better before the 1979 and the revolution.
It didn't go in line with the U.S agenda I guess, an emerging nation that nationalised its natural resources and kicked out BP, Exxon Mobil and She'll... that's why they cooked up all the fake genocides, mass graves and whatnot.
Yeah it was real gorgeous and people could travel easily between countries to live and work. l also liked how nice everyone dressed- men in corduroy tight trousers ,women all free to choose and compare that to today !
@Jacques Guerrier >Freer Yeah like publicly murdering women for using social media in Iraq. Women had status and secular freedom during Saddam's rule. Bush and Blair powered the religious fundamentalism in Iraq by giving power to minority groups. No shit that people will strike back with extreme views, imagine having a government ruled by minority groups.
my first 8 years of life was during this war. Look at what it achieved? Nothing!!! Iran and Iraq both remain with generations of broken hearts, shattred hope of better future, dark times... Wishing for better tomorrows none the less for all humanity...
@@DrAliWD no we didnt accept the ceasefire that was proposed to us by Iraq when we regained Iranian soil. You didnt prove your point as the borders didnt change after the UN ceasefire. Not even your last ditch chemical weapons could stop our advance, nor your plentiful foreign aid.
@@nirvand7431 we did achieve our point ( our goal was not to change borders it was to acknowledge the Iraqi borders) our goal was not to take Iranian soil.
@@DrAliWD No, saddam's goal was to take over arvand rud/ shat-al-arab rather than sharing the river with iran. The iran-iraq border was already acknowledged prior to the war.
@@mohamednajibhamdi4195 you can not see facts. Iranians just defend iranian lands. Nobody can push over us. Go and study history PERSIAN GULF for ever and you can not deny that. You only can be milked by USA but we are master of our life and home !
Lewis C. Saddam wanted the Jews gone just as much as you do. The only reason you brought them into this is because Jewish people are a part of an industry you don’t like so you’re angry
@@davidnorth6541 Iran threaten to break Iraqi unity using the shia. Just like chess kill one by one Iraq then Syria then Lebanon then Bahrain then Qatar then Yemen then Egypt then Lybia and last but not least Saudi Arabia
@@msgaramycin5330 Almost all countries explosit the internal divisions of adversaries to weaken them and further their own gains. Nothing unique to Iran.
Wait man were would Iran be if US invade? hehehehe you are laughing of something you couldnt do yourself. You know how many countries went against Iraq in 2003?
No. Iran never would've wanted Iraqis to suffer the way the US/Saudi Arabia caused them to suffer from 1991-present. Iran had a lot to be angry with the Iraqis for, but they'd never have wished that kind of brutality on them.
Iraq situation now is only because of the US invasion, and the conspiracy of the Arab countries on Iraq, If US invaded Iran, Iran now would look no different than the current Iraq maybe even worse Anyway I don't want to share any hatred, Iam from Iraq and I like Iran I want peace for both of these countries.
His final words 1980 - *The last 500 years, the threat has always come from Iran* Ten years later 1990 - *United States has entered the chat* Thirteen years later 2003 - *United States has connected to the server*
It's always interesting to watch old propaganda videos like this one, trying to portray Saddam's Iraq as some sort of democratic western and modern country lol!
@@dirtydave2691 Im shia. It was true but Saddam started fucked up it with stupid wars. If Saddam was more peaceful and not power hungry. Iraq would be best damn middle east country in the world. Such a shame.
angry ranger the foreign minister interviewed in this video was a Shiite. So I don’t really get you point. Saddam was never sectarian. He was socialist Arab nationalist. Over 70 percent of Ba’ath party members were of Shiite background. Saddam was very hard on Islamists whether they’re sunnis or Shiites. Since Iran convinced and aided Iraqi shites to rebel. They started committing terrorist attacks that targeted movie theaters and universities in the eighties. The government cracked down on Shiite Islamists which results in many of them being imprisoned, tortured and executed.
L Weil lol i can't believe even now you're shilling for saddam and the baath party. they were a horrid regime who committed many crimes against both the shias and the kurds. regardless of if he was sectarian, him and his party deserved the death that came to them. although iraq did not deserve the mismanagement and chaos that followed
lets be honest, people suffered by the saddam regime, but just look how well dressed those women where so far back. someone, somewhere far from these countries does not want a modern middle east.
As a 45 yrs old Iranian, I must tell my side story into this, the only true jubilant party in this was was Israeli and American and other European and even Soviet allies (for the moment) of Iraq, these folks created the enmity between these two brother nations, fueling a nonsense war for 8 years cheering for Saddam Hussain just to destroy him 2 years after that when he was tricked into attacking Kuwait. About 1 million of fine folks, women and children perished, joy? Neither of those countries should have been joyful...it was pathetic murder spree for the strength of Zionist war mongers, Iranians and Iraqis and even all Arabs Christian's and Muslims are brothers and sisters.. It was a shameful experience , I am ashamed of even think of it, hope this type of tragedies does never happen amongst our brothers..Amen
We are not brothers mate, we have different languages, different nationalism, we are Arabs and you are Persians, we were conflicting each other since thousands of years, Persians had always colonial desires and military and politic expansive ambitions against all Arab countries not only Iraq. Today arms of Iran reach Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen and even some of the western Arab countries, so do not tell me about brotherhood, you are colonials and invaders, just like the Americans, maybe you have different reasons or motives than the Americans have but in principle both of you are the same.
@@Hunter_i86 I don't believe you are a true Arab or even Muslim, you sound more like an Israeli Troll.. to be Frank, I leave this to the audience. Unfortunately, even if you are not an Israeli Troll. You are acting like one because of your immense ignorance.. When did Iran Occupy, Iraq, Syria or Yemen or Lebanon.. Just having some friends is those countries means occupying them.. America and Israel occupied all Arab lands and governments.. now Saudis an Emiraties are like Israrli puppets. So are Egyptians and Jordanians and every single other Arab countries. Has Iran even stepped in Yemen..it was Israeli Agents in Saudi..who are bombing the shit out of Yemen and they will loose anyways, So you are saying Saddam was right on Attacking Iran for America and Israel's interest..? How did it benefit Iraq or any other Arab countries. ARABS, NEED TO unite, make alliances and fight common enemies and God willing free Palestine and Lebanon and kick invaders out so our region can live in peace like it did prior to Israel coming in This Persians and Arabs fighting is Israeli false Narrative, all arabs up to 100 years ago were colonized by Turks othman Empire and by the way under Islam, until England defeated turks
@stan dardownz Your comment is irrelevant, plus your English is bad, so I did not understand what you meant by saying "fake", are you drunk or something? By the way this whole conversation is older than the events in the last 50 days, there are 3 revolutions on going now, in Iraq, Lebanon, and Iran, and all the corrupted governments will fall soon, all the militias will be finished, and the gangs of politicians and Islamic corrupted parties will be brought to justice. The Iranian extremist Islamic regime ruled for 40 years and caused so much troubles and chaos in the whole area, so it is time to make things right, it is time to correct the path, and build new systems and laws able to provide justice, dignity, and freedom for the Iraqi people and Iranian people regardless religion, race, or nationalism origins. Now go back to the hole you came from please and next time before you comment try to learn two things: 1- English language 2- History
Let us not forget, Iran was not just fighting with Iraq. Many countries were supporting Sadam with arms and intelligence; they world did nothing when Sadam used chemical weapons and finally US shot down Iranian airliner to signal the end of the war. There were lots of dirty games people don't know about, but fortunately most of well documented online.
Did the US not supply weapons to Iran secretly? I remember something called the "Iran-Contra scandal'. The US secretly sold arms to Iran to finance the anti-communist Contra rebels in Nicaragua in the early 1980s.
The Iraqi army was at its peak, in addition to Brown, it had the support of dozens of countries, on the other hand, Iran was struggling with its own new revolution and nothing was in its place, but we did not give up all this. In the end, we are peace lovers.
كانت أمريكا مع ايران وهذا الشي معروف فضيحه ايران كيت معروفه للعالم ومعها روسيا وفرنسا وكوريا الشماليه سوريا وليبا هذه الدول كلها مع ايران وهذا الشي معروف
@@OrasAltaeeهمه جهان کمک عراق کردند، ایران تنها بود، آمریکا و انگلیس و فرانسه و آلمان و شوروی و ایتالیا همگی به عراق کمک کردند، اما با این حال ایران پیروز شد
Iraqs army was dreadful. The Iranians pushed them out without a proper standing army using air power and ambushes, the Iraqis only got good in the 80s when the Iranians started really pushing for basra, but even then they were mediocre at best. Probably better than the Iraqi army of today but that's about it
Revenge is dish best served cold....!! Saddam wanted to gain a lousy River, ended up losing the whole Country to Iran! At the end of the day, Saddam along with fools who followed him were the ultimate losers...! Let this be a lesson to the ones who dream about going down the same path!
It's just too bad that Iran has gotten a corpse of a country. Iraq was a beautiful country full of talented people who've either left or been murdered. It's a real tragedy. And the only benefit to Iran of having Iraq under its influence is to protect it from whatever crazy shit the US tries next. To think that Iran's influence in Iraq today is some sort of delayed revenge against Saddam's early '80s shittiness is satisfying on some level but incorrect and dangerous. Iran's revenge against Iraq was delivered by the US from 1991 onward. If there's any revenge to be taken out, it deserves to be taken out on Saudi Arabia by both Iraq AND Iran for constantly advancing imperialist interests in the region.
It seems that you are not aware of the fact that Iran's main Interest is what lies beneath the surface! Political and Ideological alliance are not the first priorities! If it wasn't for trade with Countries like Iraq, Iran wouldn't have survived the sanctions!
Britain was partial to Iraq. The Shah's millitary expenditure really helped repel Iraqi aggression. Henry Kissinger provoked this war to weaken both countries and to strengthen Israel/US positions.
Absolute RUBBISH!! Henry Kissinger left office in 1976... The war started in September 1980!! Why is there always these conspiracy theories, where "the British " or "Henry Kissinger" is always the hidden hand behind everything....as if Arabs cannot do or think of anything unless they are told to do it?? This is incredibly stupid and arrogant!! Iraqis are also human and are driven by the same forces of greed and opportunism as every other human on this planet!! They don't require input from anyone else!!!
just like kissingers successors INVADED iraq during bush 1 and 2 to HELP ISRAEL, including doing 9/11 as a false flag to invade. thats obvious to everyone nowadays, MOST people dont trust the 9/11 iraq story AND EVERYONE knows iraq had no WMDs and theer was 0 reason to invade, they tried to blame them for 9/11 like utter clowns, no one defends it now lol. they almost did it wrong on purpose so they could create chaos so later trhey could have a lower bar, so when they had just a little bit of order, people would go "Oh this is at least better than the iraq war" lol
He did? And your proof for your claim about Kissinger, who did not occupy any office in government at the time, is...what? Oh that's right, you made it up. If anyone "provoked it" Khomenei did. Or have you never heard of the Dawa Party?
Crazy to think that the Middle East was a hell of a lot more secular 35-65 years ago then it is now in the 21st century. Obviously that has a lot to do with the second Iraq war, '79 Iran revolution, Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, '53 CIA backed coup in Iran (which was a disaster and done solely for the bidding of the elite to put a Pro American leader in and to take a democratically elected leader out), and we could probably start this endeavor with the 1947 war with Israel starting their land grab and occupation for the last half a dozen decades plus. I love my country but these idiot politicians, lobbyist, the MSM, religious neocon right wingers, and the M.I.C have a big hand in messing up and destabilizing the Middle East. Of course there's other countries, history, Sunni/ Shiite riff, and other factors as well that started/ intensified this radical element. I hope to live to see the day where a Ron Paul gets elected and we can bring all of our brave men and women home and shut down these military bases all over the world. We have no worries of another country coming to attack us at home. That is a ridiculous notion, we have arguably the strongest military the world has ever known and is really not our position to police the world. Obviously we would trade and keep good relationships with other countries, but I don't see why we have to get into these conflict. Yes, I understand the possibilities and scenarios that could happen if the United States would leave the world stage but, why can't the E.U. pick up some slack instead of just the US stepping in while they can use their tax money at home instead of building up a formidable military force. Anyway I'm going to stop here this comment has gone on too long and there is still so many more factors but that's just how I feel right now lol.
The minister talks about how Iran occupied the islands yet no mention of how Bahrain was a British protectorate which was occupied by the Brits and handed to a minority Arabs from Saudi and UAR to rule over the native Bahrainis.
@A.alaryan A.alryans - That didn't change anything, because it wasn't Iran that had this intention, Iran wanted to push back Iraqi troops to their own soil.. where in fact Iraq intention was to capture some of the major cities in the south region, which turned out to be an ugly lose - they end up fighting back with every resources to stop Iran coming in. " Iraq was so desperate that they used Chemical weapon inside their own soil that also killed many Iraqi civilians". SHAME, by far Saddam is considered as one of the biggest losers on earth - Yet it wasn't the weapons that came to rescue Iraq,it was the united nations 598 resolution that helped Iraq losing control. Once again the world came to help Iraq! - Iranians kept every CM of their soil! ponder that for a while.
Tajdaar Ahmed thanks to Islam you have many regional powers. You got Shia against Sunni. In the same religion. You got Saudi Arabia against Iran. Both pulling strings all over the place. Muslims do more damage to themselves than anything else. It’s fascinating to watch.
Lord Shadowz It’s all about power and region dominance. It has nothing to do with religion. Iran is just using Shiite minorities in Arab countries to do their bidding. It happened in Iraq and now it’s hopping in Syria and Yemen Not so different than the conflict between the Catholics and Protestants in the UK, thanks to. Christianity!
cameron zero they were never mighty , they were fooled to believe they were . Used like a tool and then look at what the same people who put them in power did to them . The Americans destroyed the whole Baath party in less than a year and their army in less than a 3 months.
@@thatguy22441 not even bussines is only a momentary convenience , then they cut the head pretending they never had relations with dictators, look South America
@@kamran1268 Saddam Hussein was a great Iraqi president he did many great positive accomplishments for Iraq he was the greatest Iraqi president that Iraq could ever have.
I believe he served a short term as Saddam's deputy, but had to retire due to disagreement with Saddam. Saddam however allowed him to live despite their differences. Later he became the assembly speaker and reappeared on UA-cam denouncing the sanctions that caused many Iraqi children to die. He survived the fall of Saddam and died several years later. He was elderly by the time of his death. If more Westerners knew about him maybe the 2003 war would not have happened.
My uncle fought in this war and came home in 1984 because of a bullet in his knee. My mom says that they had to put tape on the windows to prevent glass shattering during air raids.
These Iraqis are so funny :) when they claiming they won the war. They attacked Iran with support of entire world and fought 8 years without achieving a single of their objectives, their so called borders. And they claiming they won. 🤣🤣. At same time they asking help from us to defeat ISIS
@Haidar Mohammed i find your lack of national confidence interesting. the way you raged was really funny. if you wanna talk about hisory don't use the achievements of others in your name dear boy. here's a fact for you assuming you are iraqi. your homeland now was persian territory before the islamic invasion, so you had no part in that. you were in fact captured by muslims and obeyed their rule and lost your true colors and language. while we resisted and took back our independence and our language. just like we did against Iraq. so don't be mad about someone great only because they are. be confident in your country and people and you might be glorious in the future.
@Haidar Mohammed hiya arab, well let me tell you now , Iran controls Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen in present day. Its exported its Shia influence across the Middle East. Who's won? Clearly Iran. You Iraqis are so naive, saddam said he'd take Tehran in 3 days. In all the 8 years he couldn't get past some iranian villages , go fucking explore the world clearly you Arabs or just Iraqis don't know what mountains are.
Hello! I'm a free musician. I'm doing a thing in the spirit of the 80s, I want to put some TV samples (sound) in there for color. Do you mind if I use a few phrases from that video? I can send an MP3 later.
82 countries were helping, aiding and arming Iraq . No country except Syria (very limited) helped Iran . what makes it more interesting is Iran now is the super power present in Iraq and Syria . viva Iran and also greetings to my Iraqi brothers, we are not enemies but friends
When I went on vacation to Iraq 2 years ago, my tour guide told me that he fought in this war. He says that during the night, the Iranians would randomly start shooting at no man's land, even when they knew that were not going to hit any Iraqi soldiers, purely so that the Iraqis would not try to storm Iranian positions during the night. In the Al-Shaheed monument in Baghdad, there is a giant wall with the names of the soldiers who died in the war.
THOSE DAYS ARE OVER IRAQ IS PART OF GREATER IRAN NOW WE ARE BROTHER BY RELIGION AND BLOOD LONG LIVE GREATER IRAN SADDAM IS DEAD ARAB NATIONALISM AND SOCIALISM IS DEAD LONG LIVE UNITED IRAN AND IRAQ
LOOL IRAQ IS NOT PART OF IRAN LMAOO IRAQ IS OLDER THAN GAYRAN WE DONT HAVE CONNECTION TO IRAN OR PERSIA WE ARE DIFFFERNT PEOPLE KNOW YOUR HISTORY YOU PERSIAN KID IRAN WAS PART OF MORE THAN 10,000 YEARS LOOL
Hey buddy never forget when you had interview whit Iraqis power guys it was much better to call any place with international name. If you had chance to talk with and other Arab power guy you have to know this Golf is Persian Golf not just Golf and Iraq and Egypt and most other countries they just speak Arabic but they are not Arab
@@Мустафаиракский-я8ш Modern USSR weapons and modern US weapons both same time !only thing US regime and USSR were in the same page about was invading Iran and supporting Iraqi dictator m
One might say: 'the first world war started at least in 1913' (by which I mean: the moment in time, when the anglo-persian oil company exerted its influence on the political landscape in the persian gulf to prevent the completion of the Baghdad-railway - but that venture had a little gap [named Serbia'] to close)
CATASTROPHIC decision! Iraq's UN ambassador Al-Ali said that Iran's foreign minister Yazdi was committed to a peaceful resolution of any issue with Iraq (in 1979), but Saddam saw it as a chance to win a quick easy victory against a weakened post-Revolution Iran. It was a big mistake and the Iranians united and fought back successfully. But Iran also made a big mistake in rejecting any peace offering in 1982 and continuing the war for another 6 bloody years. Nothing good came from that war. Only America & Israel benefited.
Despite all the mistakes that have taken place and the crimes of the two governments .. But no country has the right to interfere in the affairs of other countries
If anyone repeats the falsehoods propagated by Iranian media, I want to point out that before the war, Iran's foreign minister, Ebrahim Yazdi, admitted that Iran was harassing Iraq, particularly along the borders, which was driving Iraq toward conflict. While it might be challenging to find an English translation of this statement, it is well-known among Iranians. ua-cam.com/video/QlKbTCCb3pM/v-deo.html
It is crystal clear that Saddam and his gangs including Iraqi foreign minister could not talk in such a rude way during Shah time. By happening revelation in Iran, they thought that Iran become weak but something else happened
Saddam took advantage of the weakness of the army after the Iranian revolution! He wanted to reach Tehran in a week! All the people of the Iraqi army that you see in the movie were buried in the same cities and deserts of Iran. The pilots of the Iranian Air Force fought fiercely and destroyed all the economic and political centers of Iraq. Saddam destroyed Iraq with three heavy wars, killed its youth and took Iraq to the Middle Ages
كان لنا بلد جميل اسمه العراق قبل أن تحكمه العمائم العفنة والأحزاب اللوطية لتنشر القتل والنهب والمخدرات والدعارة والطائفية ودمروا التعليم والصحة والزراعة والخدمات وهجروا المسيح والأقليات واكلوا مال الأيتام والارامل وحولوا مليارات الدولارات إلى إيران ومليشياتها المجرمة
Iranians are insane , they thought each single Gulf state such an Iranian territory, not just Iraq !! They are extremely influinced by the past " Persian empire" , and they kept acting this way til the moment , any way happened or will happen its because of their threatening and interferes in others affairs.
Actually no Iranians are very content with their current borders. We are just sick and tired of these arab countries which did not exist 100 years ago and were formed by the british after the fall of the ottoman empire, trying to claim iranian islands , Ahvaz and the Persian gulf..... dont forget Iran has been a nation state for over 2500 years and your countries have existed for nation states for less than 100 years!
I wonder if you can get the book 'Secret Affairs' by Mark Curtis, in Iran, Iraq, and the other countries in the region... It's an invaluable exposé of the real agenda behind Western foreign policy - would be a good addition to any school curriculum, I believe.
cara vaggio Not the easiest subject matter to condense - but I'll try......... Broadly speaking, London's methodology remained much akin to "the days of empire" - i.e. "local help needed to keep the lid on local populations" and retain access to resources, ideally at 'bargain prices'. But some changes were evident in the period after world war 2 - when it became apparent that in various countries, very religious/traditional groups within societies could be used as a counter to Communism, and parties which saw value in aligning with the Soviets - - not 'rocket science' as Communism is an Atheist ideology. A similar model also being deployed against Nationalist minded people(s) - who showed an interest in 'secular' politics - which would remove power from 'the church'. Generally speaking, this practice involved supplying deeply religious groups with large amounts of money, and arms, and utilizing them as agents against national administrations - Nasser being one such target - a staunch opponent of London's colonialism in Egypt. Though the countries of North Africa, and the Middle East are prominent in this methodology/history, London utilized similar tactics across the globe, often resulting in grave consequences for local populations. As London's global power fell, DC continued with similar tactics. Viewed as a long chronology, recent history in the Middle East is of particular interest - where one attempts to draw links between the prominent groups of earlier periods, and the groups now attracting the 'headlines' - i.e. what parallels might we draw, and what might we conclude as being 'on the agenda' of London, and DC, as we see various countries torn apart amid turmoil, and chaos? Where populations are set against each other, countries can be weakened to the extent that their natural resources can be stripped away, presumably quite cheaply (and with much of the cost being paid by Western tax payers in any case!), with minimal resistance to agents working for external parties - be they states, or corporations. .......................................................................................................................................................... A 'story' repeated so many times now, that it's almost a cliché - vile, greedy people in key positions of power, aiding and abetting other vile and greedy people of the corporate world, so that assets can be appropriated, at 'bargain basement' prices, and with zero regard for the murder and mayhem thrust upon local populations. Perhaps the sickest part of it all, it is possible that without external machination, many of the pertinent countries might well have moved on to secular, democratic forms of government by now - and we might not have seen the 'blow back' of the West's backing of the various groups in question. Though the cynical might conclude that the 'blow back' has itself being useful for corrupt, Western elites, as they see value in policing populations with surveillance, etc, and encourage a certain 'hysteria', perhaps to fashion excuse for their actions, and perhaps to draw attention away from their own rotten agendas.
@@kwakkers68 how naive are you, you in fact present a thorough case study on the finer points of how the dirty business of geopolitics work, but I fail to see how you draw your highly negative conclusion from any of that, as it seems like America and Britain are practitioners of fairly common methods, for the purpose of enriching their countries, their citizens, and for the corrupt, themselves. But there is nothing out of the ordinary about that, perhaps certain elements are lamentable but in geopolitics if you aren’t gaining you are losing. I don’t see how this could be viewed as negative, unless you are some kind of communist or pacifist or whatever
Whenever I see Iraq and Libya in the 80's, tears come from my eyes. Just look at their strong infrastructure at that time. My own relatives from Bangladesh worked both in Iraq and Libya in the 80s. They enjoyed high life there and people were so friendly.
@@SonOfIrakin terms of military strength, Iraq was definitely the strongest in the Arab world. I'm talking about the infrastructure and the prosperity of both Iraq and Libya had.
على الرغم من أن العراقيين كانوا معاديين لإيران ، جاء الإيرانيون لمساعدة الشعب العراقي ضد الولايات المتحدة. بعد العداء مع إيران ، توقف وان تكون مرتكب فتنة الولايات المتحدة وبريطانيا بين شعبي البلدين
enmity between arab and Persian is way more ancient than the recent enmity between arab and khazar or ashkenazi european jews who converted to judiasm and have no relation to bani israel
Iraq and Iran should be amongst the wealthiest countries in the world. Instead the vast oil wealth of both has been squandered on wars, weapons and hatred.
Oil means Money, Money means Power, too much Power means more Trouble.
Iran never fought Iraq for oil or some bullshit. It was to protect their land against the savagery of saddam
*****
Iran was attacked by Saddam Hussein.
***** Did you read what I wrote? Saddam, yes. But not Iran. Dont blame Iran. Iran was simply a victim of Saddam and Iran defended itself with honour. And Iran is very well advanced FOR the odds against it. 90% of the limitations of Iran and Iraq is because of the US because US sanctioned us. So dont say that we're limited. You dont know jack shit if you believe that.
*****
Saeed, I did indeed read what you wrote and should have written my reply better.
Funny thing is today Iran literally owns all of Iraq. How time have changed.
Pretty much Iraq collapsed right after Saddam was taken out.
Cory Griffiths
Iraq collapsed since Saddam accepted the CIA task to attack Iran!...it was very stupid mistake
Iran does not own anything , These people all were and are still people of Persian Empire, Baghdad was Persias capital once in the history. I believe we should all be united and hold the security of the region together, no need for foreign people to come here and eat our food that there will be less food for the people of this region, I hope USA and Europeans find proper jobs for their men and women insted of making murdurers of them. And I hope for the people of my region to eat less animals and become vegeterian so that they dont act like animals, of course for the americans and europeans I have the same wish.
@@ggggggg4327 Iraq was never a part of persian and will never be, Iraq had its own empires long before persia. Iraq much older then the city of Baghdad before arabic and persian. Iraq belong to the iraqi people with aramic and babylonen origin, Sumerian, Akkad, Assyrian. Persian just invaded the country before, and arab came after.
Lmao, Iran owns Iraq’s religous groups not the whole country , besides Islam as a whole owns Iran .
Iraqi foreign minister says we don't want any big power to interfere in this war, while he is benefiting from both Soviet and American tactical, informational and weaponry aid during the whole 8 years of this war!
Everybody tried stay out of this conflict, until crazy Khomaini decided to invade Israel through Iraq, the first 2 years when Iraq had the upper hand the West was helping Iran.
And the iranians benefitted from israeli weapons? Your point?
@@Radwandez My point is that there were two crazy dictator in Iran and Iraq, Saddam wanted to be the only Arabs leader and unit them under his leadership, Khomeini wanted to export his revolution to other countries and create a shiait islamic empire. So victory of any of them would be a disaster for the region and world.
@@ghenkhoash2440 what? It is so easy to close eye a and open mouth. The only problem is wise people laugh at you.
@@تلاشباور Terrible!
I remember that disgusting war. Such a waste of life on both sides.
Exactly...divide and rule
Exactly. I‘ve been in Tehran those days. People of Iran and Irak paid a high price for the madness of Khomaini and Saddam.
@@SyntheticSan and remeber Sadam was close friend to western country like last king of Iran...they chew them like chewing gum and spitting them when needed.
@@SyntheticSan Saddam wanted to invade Iran,Khomeini wanted to protect it.
Iranians don’t see it as a waste of life if you are defending your country, but tragic yes .
Sadam wasnt that smart. They used him and when they didnt win, they turned against him.
Joey Davies
Spell his name for us then. And did you had a childhood friend named sadam like i did? The man won't try to play with fire if he was that smart. He was arrogant and out of touch. you don't mess with super powers until you get power. Sadam commited political suicide with his arrogance and thought he was invisible. You mess with Petro-dollar and they over throw you.
Monster samator saddam was thinking to be great hero To save palastine but israil brought back khomaini to stopphim
Monster samator shut up Iran gate western still use iran untill now there is now truly adversity between western And iran And saddam was nationalist who defend his country from Iran expansive ambitions
@@peshpeshabdulla Why you talking out of your ass? Your such a dumbass iran is the only country that doesnt work with israel. All the other so called muslim countries dont do shit.
History will repeat ,those who don't learn, will pay for it ,iran and iraq until they have mullah and until UK exist will be the same and nothing will be changed,,British are taking advantage of stupid common pepole who ,,if they want change they should put religion in the bin and face the reality, not allah says this allah says that
23 years later, Sa'dun Hammadi was still a government official as the speaker of the national assembly until the fall of Baghdad.
He passed away in Germany ,March 2007
2020 shit just got fucked up
I'm a child of Iranians, and even I feel bad for the tragedy which has befallen Iraq. We're not talking about a poor, chaotic country. Iraq was rich and modern.
Thank you man I respect that, instead of the others talking about some shit. In my opinion as well I think Iran was better before the 1979 and the revolution.
how was it better? iran under any ruling party has and will do good (dorood bar iranian)
Agreed.
It didn't go in line with the U.S agenda I guess, an emerging nation that nationalised its natural resources and kicked out BP, Exxon Mobil and She'll... that's why they cooked up all the fake genocides, mass graves and whatnot.
Shariah and extremist thats what happened after saddam falls
History never forget Iran Iraq war
لا عادي
Baghdad used to be so gorgeous. Very, very sad what we've done to that country.
herrgolf we can’t blame it all on ISIS 😁
Yeah it was real gorgeous and people could travel easily between countries to live and work. l also liked how nice everyone dressed- men in corduroy tight trousers ,women all free to choose and compare that to today !
@@andrethomas7075 it was the USA
@Jacques Guerrier
>Freer
Yeah like publicly murdering women for using social media in Iraq.
Women had status and secular freedom during Saddam's rule. Bush and Blair powered the religious fundamentalism in Iraq by giving power to minority groups. No shit that people will strike back with extreme views, imagine having a government ruled by minority groups.
It is a shit hole and it used to be a shit hole.
my first 8 years of life was during this war. Look at what it achieved? Nothing!!! Iran and Iraq both remain with generations of broken hearts, shattred hope of better future, dark times... Wishing for better tomorrows none the less for all humanity...
iran did put up a very good resistance. against Iraq.
Better yet, we pushed back into faav
@@nirvand7431 yeah but we proved our point. Oh and you didn't push into faav, the Iraqi Army withdrew because Iran accepted the conditions.
@@DrAliWD no we didnt accept the ceasefire that was proposed to us by Iraq when we regained Iranian soil. You didnt prove your point as the borders didnt change after the UN ceasefire. Not even your last ditch chemical weapons could stop our advance, nor your plentiful foreign aid.
@@nirvand7431 we did achieve our point ( our goal was not to change borders it was to acknowledge the Iraqi borders) our goal was not to take Iranian soil.
@@DrAliWD No, saddam's goal was to take over arvand rud/ shat-al-arab rather than sharing the river with iran. The iran-iraq border was already acknowledged prior to the war.
Well this was a very crappy one sided, bias propaganda/ coverage of the situation :) love how Saddam was a western sweetheart
Shut up Iran gate
Lewis C. Oy vey
@@mohamednajibhamdi4195 you can not see facts.
Iranians just defend iranian lands.
Nobody can push over us.
Go and study history PERSIAN GULF for ever and you can not deny that.
You only can be milked by USA but we are master of our life and home !
Islam ruined this beautiful country followed by the USA making it even worse.
Lewis C. Saddam wanted the Jews gone just as much as you do. The only reason you brought them into this is because Jewish people are a part of an industry you don’t like so you’re angry
Just this war destroyed my life and my family
😖
that's right.. but how we can tell this truth.for some ldiots.greeting for you and your family
When Saddam was still an American tool
hahahaha
Yes, a way to ensure someone like Qasim could never be in charge.
haid kar hahahaah fuck u You lost!
Saddam was not an American tool; it was the Soviet Union who primarily supplied Iraq with weapons paid by oil and GCC loans.
Same as the Soviets. They supplied them with Weapons before it withdraws it's Support.
The Iraqis where responsible for the War not Iranians.
It was middle east defense against Iranian threat on Arab countries
@@msgaramycin5330 No it wasn't. It was a miscalculated and clumsy Iraqi Invasion of Iran that failed miserably.
@@davidnorth6541 Iran threaten to break Iraqi unity using the shia. Just like chess kill one by one Iraq then Syria then Lebanon then Bahrain then Qatar then Yemen then Egypt then Lybia and last but not least Saudi Arabia
@@msgaramycin5330 Almost all countries explosit the internal divisions of adversaries to weaken them and further their own gains. Nothing unique to Iran.
Remember, this is when Saddam was best buddies with Britain and the United States
Well, Look at Iran now and look at Iraq now. Its talks for its self right ?
You had it coming, Saddam had it coming. Deal with it.
Wait man were would Iran be if US invade? hehehehe you are laughing of something you couldnt do yourself. You know how many countries went against Iraq in 2003?
No. Iran never would've wanted Iraqis to suffer the way the US/Saudi Arabia caused them to suffer from 1991-present. Iran had a lot to be angry with the Iraqis for, but they'd never have wished that kind of brutality on them.
@@sorostampour yes he had it coming.
Whoever decides to be American stooge and has oil, always have it coming.
Iraq situation now is only because of the US invasion, and the conspiracy of the Arab countries on Iraq,
If US invaded Iran, Iran now would look no different than the current Iraq maybe even worse
Anyway I don't want to share any hatred, Iam from Iraq and I like Iran
I want peace for both of these countries.
His final words 1980 - *The last 500 years, the threat has always come from Iran*
Ten years later 1990 - *United States has entered the chat*
Thirteen years later 2003 - *United States has connected to the server*
but iran and syria help usa in gulf war !?
It's always interesting to watch old propaganda videos like this one, trying to portray Saddam's Iraq as some sort of democratic western and modern country lol!
@Haidar Mohammed Provided you were Sunni and a member of the Bath' party.
@@dirtydave2691 Im shia. It was true but Saddam started fucked up it with stupid wars. If Saddam was more peaceful and not power hungry. Iraq would be best damn middle east country in the world. Such a shame.
angry ranger the foreign minister interviewed in this video was a Shiite. So I don’t really get you point. Saddam was never sectarian. He was socialist Arab nationalist. Over 70 percent of Ba’ath party members were of Shiite background. Saddam was very hard on Islamists whether they’re sunnis or Shiites. Since Iran convinced and aided Iraqi shites to rebel. They started committing terrorist attacks that targeted movie theaters and universities in the eighties. The government cracked down on Shiite Islamists which results in many of them being imprisoned, tortured and executed.
@@lweil9291 70% of Baath party members were not Shia.
L Weil lol i can't believe even now you're shilling for saddam and the baath party. they were a horrid regime who committed many crimes against both the shias and the kurds. regardless of if he was sectarian, him and his party deserved the death that came to them. although iraq did not deserve the mismanagement and chaos that followed
anyone watching this after today's events?
lets be honest, people suffered by the saddam regime, but just look how well dressed those women where so far back. someone, somewhere far from these countries does not want a modern middle east.
@@Norwegianization thats your opinion but im afrai the ppl inthe mid east shoot themselves in the foot
............ 😣 ..............
✌
@@mehranmossaddad1656 Well, either I'm glad that we don't have yet another war...
@@gurufabbes1 me too
As a 45 yrs old Iranian, I must tell my side story into this, the only true jubilant party in this was was Israeli and American and other European and even Soviet allies (for the moment) of Iraq, these folks created the enmity between these two brother nations, fueling a nonsense war for 8 years cheering for Saddam Hussain just to destroy him 2 years after that when he was tricked into attacking Kuwait.
About 1 million of fine folks, women and children perished, joy? Neither of those countries should have been joyful...it was pathetic murder spree for the strength of Zionist war mongers,
Iranians and Iraqis and even all Arabs Christian's and Muslims are brothers and sisters..
It was a shameful experience , I am ashamed of even think of it, hope this type of tragedies does never happen amongst our brothers..Amen
We are not brothers mate, we have different languages, different nationalism, we are Arabs and you are Persians, we were conflicting each other since thousands of years, Persians had always colonial desires and military and politic expansive ambitions against all Arab countries not only Iraq. Today arms of Iran reach Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen and even some of the western Arab countries, so do not tell me about brotherhood, you are colonials and invaders, just like the Americans, maybe you have different reasons or motives than the Americans have but in principle both of you are the same.
@@Hunter_i86
I don't believe you are a true Arab or even Muslim, you sound more like an Israeli Troll.. to be Frank, I leave this to the audience.
Unfortunately, even if you are not an Israeli Troll. You are acting like one because of your immense ignorance..
When did Iran Occupy, Iraq, Syria or Yemen or Lebanon..
Just having some friends is those countries means occupying them..
America and Israel occupied all Arab lands and governments.. now Saudis an Emiraties are like Israrli puppets. So are Egyptians and Jordanians and every single other Arab countries.
Has Iran even stepped in Yemen..it was Israeli Agents in Saudi..who are bombing the shit out of Yemen and they will loose anyways,
So you are saying Saddam was right on Attacking Iran for America and Israel's interest..?
How did it benefit Iraq or any other Arab countries.
ARABS, NEED TO unite, make alliances and fight common enemies and God willing free Palestine and Lebanon and kick invaders out so our region can live in peace like it did prior to Israel coming in
This Persians and Arabs fighting is Israeli false Narrative, all arabs up to 100 years ago were colonized by Turks othman Empire and by the way under Islam, until England defeated turks
@stan dardownz Your comment is irrelevant, plus your English is bad, so I did not understand what you meant by saying "fake", are you drunk or something? By the way this whole conversation is older than the events in the last 50 days, there are 3 revolutions on going now, in Iraq, Lebanon, and Iran, and all the corrupted governments will fall soon, all the militias will be finished, and the gangs of politicians and Islamic corrupted parties will be brought to justice. The Iranian extremist Islamic regime ruled for 40 years and caused so much troubles and chaos in the whole area, so it is time to make things right, it is time to correct the path, and build new systems and laws able to provide justice, dignity, and freedom for the Iraqi people and Iranian people regardless religion, race, or nationalism origins. Now go back to the hole you came from please and next time before you comment try to learn two things:
1- English language
2- History
You are right ..the real question is...why is the middle east always so dumb to fall for it? It's your own godamn fault...
@@Hunter_i86 you are wrong...there will be no peace there in that region until god is dead..
Let us not forget, Iran was not just fighting with Iraq. Many countries were supporting Sadam with arms and intelligence; they world did nothing when Sadam used chemical weapons and finally US shot down Iranian airliner to signal the end of the war. There were lots of dirty games people don't know about, but fortunately most of well documented online.
Mullas have ruined the middle east, they are not Iran. They are a cancer, and they are supported by the West.
Did the US not supply weapons to Iran secretly? I remember something called the "Iran-Contra scandal'. The US secretly sold arms to Iran to finance the anti-communist Contra rebels in Nicaragua in the early 1980s.
كانت ايران تحصل على الدعم العسكري من امريكا عن طريق اسرائيل او ما يعرف ب ايران كونترا
@@alialasde2001نجب
The Iraqi army was at its peak, in addition to Brown, it had the support of dozens of countries, on the other hand, Iran was struggling with its own new revolution and nothing was in its place, but we did not give up all this. In the end, we are peace lovers.
Syria stood with Iran, though, which is why Iran has helped Syria in recent years
@@yalbad5160Syrian army was also very strong back then, also saddam betrayed Syria in 1979, Wich is why Hafez never forgive him
Iran? Peace lovers? 😂😂😂😂
كانت أمريكا مع ايران وهذا الشي معروف فضيحه ايران كيت معروفه للعالم ومعها روسيا وفرنسا وكوريا الشماليه سوريا وليبا هذه الدول كلها مع ايران وهذا الشي معروف
@@OrasAltaeeهمه جهان کمک عراق کردند، ایران تنها بود، آمریکا و انگلیس و فرانسه و آلمان و شوروی و ایتالیا همگی به عراق کمک کردند، اما با این حال ایران پیروز شد
Iraqs army then was at its best then.
Very tough, brutal war
Iraqs army was dreadful. The Iranians pushed them out without a proper standing army using air power and ambushes, the Iraqis only got good in the 80s when the Iranians started really pushing for basra, but even then they were mediocre at best. Probably better than the Iraqi army of today but that's about it
Iran was at its weakest then too, Imagine messing with Iran now.
Revenge is dish best served cold....!! Saddam wanted to gain a lousy River, ended up losing the whole Country to Iran! At the end of the day, Saddam along with fools who followed him were the ultimate losers...! Let this be a lesson to the ones who dream about going down the same path!
sounds just like what US did..
What U.S did was put Iraq on a silver plate and presented to Iran! Unwillingly of course!
jeff sam my name is Jeff
It's just too bad that Iran has gotten a corpse of a country. Iraq was a beautiful country full of talented people who've either left or been murdered. It's a real tragedy. And the only benefit to Iran of having Iraq under its influence is to protect it from whatever crazy shit the US tries next. To think that Iran's influence in Iraq today is some sort of delayed revenge against Saddam's early '80s shittiness is satisfying on some level but incorrect and dangerous. Iran's revenge against Iraq was delivered by the US from 1991 onward. If there's any revenge to be taken out, it deserves to be taken out on Saudi Arabia by both Iraq AND Iran for constantly advancing imperialist interests in the region.
It seems that you are not aware of the fact that Iran's main Interest is what lies beneath the surface! Political and Ideological alliance are not the first priorities! If it wasn't for trade with Countries like Iraq, Iran wouldn't have survived the sanctions!
Britain was partial to Iraq. The Shah's millitary expenditure really helped repel Iraqi aggression. Henry Kissinger provoked this war to weaken both countries and to strengthen Israel/US positions.
Absolute RUBBISH!!
Henry Kissinger left office in 1976...
The war started in September 1980!!
Why is there always these conspiracy theories, where "the British " or "Henry Kissinger" is always the hidden hand behind everything....as if Arabs cannot do or think of anything unless they are told to do it??
This is incredibly stupid and arrogant!!
Iraqis are also human and are driven by the same forces of greed and opportunism as every other human on this planet!! They don't require input from anyone else!!!
just like kissingers successors INVADED iraq during bush 1 and 2 to HELP ISRAEL, including doing 9/11 as a false flag to invade. thats obvious to everyone nowadays, MOST people dont trust the 9/11 iraq story AND EVERYONE knows iraq had no WMDs and theer was 0 reason to invade, they tried to blame them for 9/11 like utter clowns, no one defends it now lol. they almost did it wrong on purpose so they could create chaos so later trhey could have a lower bar, so when they had just a little bit of order, people would go "Oh this is at least better than the iraq war" lol
Was Henry the only reason this war kicked off?
He did? And your proof for your claim about Kissinger, who did not occupy any office in government at the time, is...what? Oh that's right, you made it up. If anyone "provoked it" Khomenei did. Or have you never heard of the Dawa Party?
lol what
It's a shame! I cannot believe this BS was fed to world as news!
saratan007 as if mention in the bs they paid reporter in 500 room hotel to report this.
Crazy to think that the Middle East was a hell of a lot more secular 35-65 years ago then it is now in the 21st century. Obviously that has a lot to do with the second Iraq war, '79 Iran revolution, Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, '53 CIA backed coup in Iran (which was a disaster and done solely for the bidding of the elite to put a Pro American leader in and to take a democratically elected leader out), and we could probably start this endeavor with the 1947 war with Israel starting their land grab and occupation for the last half a dozen decades plus. I love my country but these idiot politicians, lobbyist, the MSM, religious neocon right wingers, and the M.I.C have a big hand in messing up and destabilizing the Middle East. Of course there's other countries, history, Sunni/ Shiite riff, and other factors as well that started/ intensified this radical element. I hope to live to see the day where a Ron Paul gets elected and we can bring all of our brave men and women home and shut down these military bases all over the world. We have no worries of another country coming to attack us at home. That is a ridiculous notion, we have arguably the strongest military the world has ever known and is really not our position to police the world. Obviously we would trade and keep good relationships with other countries, but I don't see why we have to get into these conflict. Yes, I understand the possibilities and scenarios that could happen if the United States would leave the world stage but, why can't the E.U. pick up some slack instead of just the US stepping in while they can use their tax money at home instead of building up a formidable military force. Anyway I'm going to stop here this comment has gone on too long and there is still so many more factors but that's just how I feel right now lol.
stfu and your secularization. This secularization attempt led to these wars. Go fuck yourself. You can't take our religion away from us.
@@saeedvazirian Based
Once they were the enemy each other now they are the best allies in region
allies in terms of islamofascism ideology, we do not want that kind of aliance
The minister talks about how Iran occupied the islands yet no mention of how Bahrain was a British protectorate which was occupied by the Brits and handed to a minority Arabs from Saudi and UAR to rule over the native Bahrainis.
Such a great time machine video. Thanks for sharing
14:11 WRONG ASSUMPTIONS - Iran had the ability to go on and after libration of Khuramshahr, Iran was inside Iraq in Basra for 70 km.
@A.alaryan A.alryans - That didn't change anything, because it wasn't Iran that had this intention, Iran wanted to push back Iraqi troops to their own soil.. where in fact Iraq intention was to capture some of the major cities in the south region, which turned out to be an ugly lose - they end up fighting back with every resources to stop Iran coming in. " Iraq was so desperate that they used Chemical weapon inside their own soil that also killed many Iraqi civilians". SHAME, by far Saddam is considered as one of the biggest losers on earth - Yet it wasn't the weapons that came to rescue Iraq,it was the united nations 598 resolution that helped Iraq losing control. Once again the world came to help Iraq! - Iranians kept every CM of their soil! ponder that for a while.
@A.alaryan A.alryans
Iranian army fled and Iraqi forces pushed inside Iran
@user-ui3pw1ys3k Iran didn't even have forces! Instead there large numbers of militia's ( in the start of the war )
هذا الشخص كان أحد المطبلين لصدام الظالم ويتحمل مسؤولية الدماء الزكية التي اريقت في هذه الحرب.
Iranian have greatest resisting capacity against its enemies despite so many sanction by America it has grown regional power
Tajdaar Ahmed thanks to Islam you have many regional powers. You got Shia against Sunni. In the same religion. You got Saudi Arabia against Iran. Both pulling strings all over the place. Muslims do more damage to themselves than anything else. It’s fascinating to watch.
@@Lord_Shadowz So you are saying christian african tribes don't kill each other? What about christian american school shooters?
@@therealmiddleground lmao school shootings has nothing to do with Christianity, they are just psycho and crazy people shooting up schools.
@@therealmiddleground shouting at school ?do you realy can't understand the difference? Lol
Lord Shadowz It’s all about power and region dominance. It has nothing to do with religion. Iran is just using Shiite minorities in Arab countries to do their bidding. It happened in Iraq and now it’s hopping in Syria and Yemen
Not so different than the conflict between the Catholics and Protestants in the UK, thanks to. Christianity!
How the mighty have fallen, look at iraq now
cameron zero they were never mighty , they were fooled to believe they were . Used like a tool and then look at what the same people who put them in power did to them . The Americans destroyed the whole Baath party in less than a year and their army in less than a 3 months.
...A very informative and balance report.
At that time, Saddam Hossein was playing a good guy role for the west, same as Mojahedins/later known as Al Qaeda in fight with Soviets...
The line between hero and villain is whether the US can do business with them or not, at least in this country.
@@thatguy22441 not even bussines is only a momentary convenience , then they cut the head pretending they never had relations with dictators, look South America
Saddam Hussein was always a good guy
@@giovannicano2889 for US? So he was expired then F...ed?!😎
@@kamran1268 Saddam Hussein was a great Iraqi president he did many great positive accomplishments for Iraq he was the greatest Iraqi president that Iraq could ever have.
20:04 😂😂.
Iraq went on to invade Kuwait after the end of this war
Hey.. U take my name... 🤔
@@AliAbbas-wz4gc lolz 😘
it's amazing really how things change
Very Ironic Interview .......where is that minister now???
I believe he served a short term as Saddam's deputy, but had to retire due to disagreement with Saddam. Saddam however allowed him to live despite their differences. Later he became the assembly speaker and reappeared on UA-cam denouncing the sanctions that caused many Iraqi children to die. He survived the fall of Saddam and died several years later. He was elderly by the time of his death. If more Westerners knew about him maybe the 2003 war would not have happened.
He died from cancer in2007 in Doha_Qatar
On a Deck of playing cards.
Jacob L Right Lol, it’s Sa'dun Hammadi
Bijan Mir Sorry he passed away and he only had 27,000 dollars
Little hidden gem documentary here, nice!
My uncle fought in this war and came home in 1984 because of a bullet in his knee.
My mom says that they had to put tape on the windows to prevent glass shattering during air raids.
He used to be an adventurer like you
(Skyrim)
When iraq and usa were friends ...
Irak never been friend with usa and never will trust those bastards
They used saddam like a toilet paper and killed him like a barking mad dog.
Zolfe Lee loool son of bitch America brought down Saddam not you
Khomainey too
@@ksa3090 And what good did that do?
Wow amazing footage make the war more understandable with footage
Those were not Iranian tanks........
I spotted that as well this film is garbage.
I think we had some soviet weaponry like ZSU-57-2, BMP 2 and RPG 7.
Hey that’s my chemistry teacher
The reporter has a certain 'Eric Idle' voice and delivery. Can't help but give this a slightly comical aspect.
Total western propoganda
very well spoken Iraqi minister
mark owdeesh saddon Homadi was
Televised on the 2nd of October or the 10th of February?
These Iraqis are so funny :) when they claiming they won the war. They attacked Iran with support of entire world and fought 8 years without achieving a single of their objectives, their so called borders. And they claiming they won. 🤣🤣. At same time they asking help from us to defeat ISIS
@Haidar Mohammed but what was are you before the islam ?!! go study bit about your background you silly arab , you mother cooked lizard
O: hahah
@Haidar Mohammed i find your lack of national confidence interesting. the way you raged was really funny. if you wanna talk about hisory don't use the achievements of others in your name dear boy. here's a fact for you assuming you are iraqi. your homeland now was persian territory before the islamic invasion, so you had no part in that. you were in fact captured by muslims and obeyed their rule and lost your true colors and language. while we resisted and took back our independence and our language. just like we did against Iraq. so don't be mad about someone great only because they are. be confident in your country and people and you might be glorious in the future.
@Haidar Mohammed hiya arab, well let me tell you now , Iran controls Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen in present day. Its exported its Shia influence across the Middle East. Who's won? Clearly Iran. You Iraqis are so naive, saddam said he'd take Tehran in 3 days. In all the 8 years he couldn't get past some iranian villages , go fucking explore the world clearly you Arabs or just Iraqis don't know what mountains are.
@Haidar Mohammed yeah, and then the war finished. Tell me, who controls Iraq now?
@Haidar Mohammed Obama handed it over he was a traitor
Hello!
I'm a free musician. I'm doing a thing in the spirit of the 80s, I want to put some TV samples (sound) in there for color. Do you mind if I use a few phrases from that video?
I can send an MP3 later.
1:56 Those M60s look a lot like T-72s.
I didn’t know they got T-72s so early. I thought they didn’t get them until 84-85?
Fascinating report.
"For once an arab army is inflicting...on enemy".... epic LOL
U don’t know anything about arabs
82 countries were helping, aiding and arming Iraq . No country except Syria (very limited) helped Iran . what makes it more interesting is Iran now is the super power present in Iraq and Syria . viva Iran and also greetings to my Iraqi brothers, we are not enemies but friends
Syria was a regional power back then what do you mean limited ?
Israel was helping 🇮🇷 to the deepest 🇮🇱 and also 🇺🇸 remember ( iran contra)
Libya and North Korea helped Iran
40 years later and Iraq is friends with Iran . That has westerners MAD. This is how you do it. Viva Iran ,viva Iraq
American propaganda!show some kind of resistance?ha!i think it is just a few days before the liberation of khoramshar with 20000 arab troops captured!
Something like that the two hands of the same person is stabbing each other.. Heartbreaking tragedy..
خوميني من بدا الحرب و بدو يصدر ثوره الخومينيه للعرب
Who's laughing now?
+Roland Wiggensbach long live Israel ......
I was one of those fighting on Iran's aide but I am not laughing, but I am happy and glad Iraqi Shia and Kurds are free.
@@marka.1770
Death to Israel
@@sarasadeghian7157 Death to israel.
Israel is laughing idio.t
Saadoun Hammadi, Indiana University graduate, is very intelligent and polite
When I went on vacation to Iraq 2 years ago, my tour guide told me that he fought in this war. He says that during the night, the Iranians would randomly start shooting at no man's land, even when they knew that were not going to hit any Iraqi soldiers, purely so that the Iraqis would not try to storm Iranian positions during the night. In the Al-Shaheed monument in Baghdad, there is a giant wall with the names of the soldiers who died in the war.
THOSE DAYS ARE OVER IRAQ IS PART OF GREATER IRAN NOW WE ARE BROTHER BY RELIGION AND BLOOD LONG LIVE GREATER IRAN SADDAM IS DEAD ARAB NATIONALISM AND SOCIALISM IS DEAD LONG LIVE UNITED IRAN AND IRAQ
LOOL IRAQ IS NOT PART OF IRAN LMAOO IRAQ IS OLDER THAN GAYRAN WE DONT HAVE CONNECTION TO IRAN OR PERSIA WE ARE DIFFFERNT PEOPLE KNOW YOUR HISTORY YOU PERSIAN KID IRAN WAS PART OF MORE THAN 10,000 YEARS LOOL
Hey buddy never forget when you had interview whit Iraqis power guys it was much better to call any place with international name.
If you had chance to talk with and other Arab power guy you have to know this Golf is Persian Golf not just Golf and Iraq and Egypt and most other countries they just speak Arabic but they are not Arab
let's make a deal
the GOLF is Persian
but
the GULF is Arabian
@@heathcliffcuckoo
I think this deal will be better if you call all history papers and documents bullshit and Arbs bills as a real deal
Iraq had the military equipment while Iran had the Manpower
What equipment Iraq had in 1980 ? Old Soviet weapons
@@Мустафаиракский-я8ш Western chemical weapons
@@Мустафаиракский-я8ш
Modern USSR weapons and modern US weapons both same time !only thing US regime and USSR were in the same page about was invading Iran and supporting Iraqi dictator m
4 years after war,Saddam was begging for peace, even with the help of 15 Arab countries and some European countries
Khomenei was kissing Saddam's ass for peace in 1988
Iraq went bankrupt in 1984.Tbe debt ballooned from there until the Paris conference in 2004_2005. 80 to 90 percent of the debt was forgiven.
Iran does not always respect the rights of its neighbors because it has expansionist ambitions.God be save iraq people.
was it not Iraq who invaded Iran
Sadam started the war and Iran defended by itself it's a tue thing that you won't know it never
Who lit the fire on the Iran-Iraq tinder? Has to be the famous divide & conquer specialist.
im from Iran if I was old enough to go fight at that time I would surly would have done that
حتى ترجع إلى اهلك بتابوت
@@OrasAltaeeIranian teenagers defeated Iraq whole army
هههههه هههههه هههههه 😁😂😁😂😄😁😄
@@OrasAltaee hahaha cry harder Iraqi 😂💪
those baghdadis are hearing these sirens from 1980's.... and sirens havent stopped yet...
It was a very unfortunate war between the two neighboring country , who have a lots of common interests .
One might say: 'the first world war started at least in 1913'
(by which I mean: the moment in time, when the anglo-persian oil company exerted its influence on the political landscape in the persian gulf to prevent the completion of the Baghdad-railway - but that venture had a little gap [named Serbia'] to close)
CATASTROPHIC decision!
Iraq's UN ambassador Al-Ali said that Iran's foreign minister Yazdi was committed to a peaceful resolution of any issue with Iraq (in 1979), but Saddam saw it as a chance to win a quick easy victory against a weakened post-Revolution Iran.
It was a big mistake and the Iranians united and fought back successfully.
But Iran also made a big mistake in rejecting any peace offering in 1982 and continuing the war for another 6 bloody years.
Nothing good came from that war. Only America & Israel benefited.
After 40 years I can see (how attack first ,lost after) I can see how is managed bagdad government!
Despite all the mistakes that have taken place and the crimes of the two governments .. But no country has the right to interfere in the affairs of other countries
Then why did Iran interfere in the internal affairs of my country, South Africa?
i am surprise still people get side in that dirty war....
Imagine Iraq now if the war did not happen in 2003
Iran payande💖persian gulf 💖💖💖💪
@Reem 1998 arabian gulf name not on the map
@Reem 1998 😂😂😂👎👎👎👎👎👎
If anyone repeats the falsehoods propagated by Iranian media, I want to point out that before the war, Iran's foreign minister, Ebrahim Yazdi, admitted that Iran was harassing Iraq, particularly along the borders, which was driving Iraq toward conflict. While it might be challenging to find an English translation of this statement, it is well-known among Iranians.
ua-cam.com/video/QlKbTCCb3pM/v-deo.html
Iraq is a powerful country. I love Iraq
Was
They have no power. We Persians kicked Iraq ass.
It is crystal clear that Saddam and his gangs including Iraqi foreign minister could not talk in such a rude way during Shah time. By happening revelation in Iran, they thought that Iran become weak but something else happened
and iraqis were stupid enough to fall in this trap, set up by US, Persian are usually a smart fellow...
Goddamn that oil it had ruined our life..........enough god ENOUGH!
We can't take anymore
Saddam took advantage of the weakness of the army after the Iranian revolution! He wanted to reach Tehran in a week! All the people of the Iraqi army that you see in the movie were buried in the same cities and deserts of Iran. The pilots of the Iranian Air Force fought fiercely and destroyed all the economic and political centers of Iraq. Saddam destroyed Iraq with three heavy wars, killed its youth and took Iraq to the Middle Ages
كان لنا بلد جميل اسمه العراق قبل أن تحكمه العمائم العفنة والأحزاب اللوطية لتنشر القتل والنهب والمخدرات والدعارة والطائفية ودمروا التعليم والصحة والزراعة والخدمات وهجروا المسيح والأقليات واكلوا مال الأيتام والارامل وحولوا مليارات الدولارات إلى إيران ومليشياتها المجرمة
انته مو عراقي انته من أبناء عائشه الكحبه رعاه الابل 😂😂😂
Iranians are insane , they thought each single Gulf state such an Iranian territory, not just Iraq !!
They are extremely influinced by the past " Persian empire" , and they kept acting this way til the moment , any way happened or will happen its because of their threatening and interferes in others affairs.
iranian soldier nope southern Iran belongs to arabs
Without western intervention, half of the countries in the middle east wouldn't even exist.
Actually no Iranians are very content with their current borders. We are just sick and tired of these arab countries which did not exist 100 years ago and were formed by the british after the fall of the ottoman empire, trying to claim iranian islands , Ahvaz and the Persian gulf..... dont forget Iran has been a nation state for over 2500 years and your countries have existed for nation states for less than 100 years!
This war lasted so many years and a real waiste it was.
2:01 those aren't m60s what they showed they just showed t-72s and bmps being held somewhere
Very interesting
I wonder if you can get the book 'Secret Affairs' by Mark Curtis, in Iran, Iraq, and the other countries in the region... It's an invaluable exposé of the real agenda behind Western foreign policy - would be a good addition to any school curriculum, I believe.
Want to give an outline of what's in the book
cara vaggio
Not the easiest subject matter to condense - but I'll try......... Broadly speaking, London's methodology remained much akin to "the days of empire" - i.e. "local help needed to keep the lid on local populations" and retain access to resources, ideally at 'bargain prices'. But some changes were evident in the period after world war 2 - when it became apparent that in various countries, very religious/traditional groups within societies could be used as a counter to Communism, and parties which saw value in aligning with the Soviets - - not 'rocket science' as Communism is an Atheist ideology. A similar model also being deployed against Nationalist minded people(s) - who showed an interest in 'secular' politics - which would remove power from 'the church'. Generally speaking, this practice involved supplying deeply religious groups with large amounts of money, and arms, and utilizing them as agents against national administrations - Nasser being one such target - a staunch opponent of London's colonialism in Egypt. Though the countries of North Africa, and the Middle East are prominent in this methodology/history, London utilized similar tactics across the globe, often resulting in grave consequences for local populations. As London's global power fell, DC continued with similar tactics. Viewed as a long chronology, recent history in the Middle East is of particular interest - where one attempts to draw links between the prominent groups of earlier periods, and the groups now attracting the 'headlines' - i.e. what parallels might we draw, and what might we conclude as being 'on the agenda' of London, and DC, as we see various countries torn apart amid turmoil, and chaos? Where populations are set against each other, countries can be weakened to the extent that their natural resources can be stripped away, presumably quite cheaply (and with much of the cost being paid by Western tax payers in any case!), with minimal resistance to agents working for external parties - be they states, or corporations. .......................................................................................................................................................... A 'story' repeated so many times now, that it's almost a cliché - vile, greedy people in key positions of power, aiding and abetting other vile and greedy people of the corporate world, so that assets can be appropriated, at 'bargain basement' prices, and with zero regard for the murder and mayhem thrust upon local populations. Perhaps the sickest part of it all, it is possible that without external machination, many of the pertinent countries might well have moved on to secular, democratic forms of government by now - and we might not have seen the 'blow back' of the West's backing of the various groups in question. Though the cynical might conclude that the 'blow back' has itself being useful for corrupt, Western elites, as they see value in policing populations with surveillance, etc, and encourage a certain 'hysteria', perhaps to fashion excuse for their actions, and perhaps to draw attention away from their own rotten agendas.
Thank you; I will look up this book and potentially find a way to read it.
herrgolf Not long ago, the Introduction was available online, free, it's well worth finding a copy if you can!
@@kwakkers68 how naive are you, you in fact present a thorough case study on the finer points of how the dirty business of geopolitics work, but I fail to see how you draw your highly negative conclusion from any of that, as it seems like America and Britain are practitioners of fairly common methods, for the purpose of enriching their countries, their citizens, and for the corrupt, themselves. But there is nothing out of the ordinary about that, perhaps certain elements are lamentable but in geopolitics if you aren’t gaining you are losing. I don’t see how this could be viewed as negative, unless you are some kind of communist or pacifist or whatever
@1:52 Those are M60's?
T72
Now after all IRAN and Iraq trying to be friends but the west doesn't want that. But their dream shattered to pieces when both countries United.
0:20 which Golf? There are so many on earth...
Yea we saw who was leading which country to catastrophe Lol
Whenever I see Iraq and Libya in the 80's, tears come from my eyes. Just look at their strong infrastructure at that time. My own relatives from Bangladesh worked both in Iraq and Libya in the 80s. They enjoyed high life there and people were so friendly.
lol you're comparing Irak power to Libya ?
@@SonOfIrakin terms of military strength, Iraq was definitely the strongest in the Arab world. I'm talking about the infrastructure and the prosperity of both Iraq and Libya had.
hahaa he said this regime takes iran to catastrophe!! he didn't know its now their people and government that depended on iran !!!
4:00 those ladies would be 65 or older today, as i estimate them to be in ranges 25 ,through 30 in 1980.
Persian gulf
على الرغم من أن العراقيين كانوا معاديين لإيران ، جاء الإيرانيون لمساعدة الشعب العراقي ضد الولايات المتحدة. بعد العداء مع إيران ، توقف وان تكون مرتكب فتنة الولايات المتحدة وبريطانيا بين شعبي البلدين
wow look at Iraq back in the 80s
enmity between arab and Persian is way more ancient than the recent enmity between arab and khazar or ashkenazi european jews who converted to judiasm and have no relation to bani israel