Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

Flashback Arrest - Ep.5 - Gilles Deleuze on Francis Bacon

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 лип 2021
  • A brief summary and ramblings on the first chapter of Gilles Deleuze's book on Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation.
    IG: @flashbackarrest
    host's IG: @juansdilemma
    Music:
    Vulcan Street
    Cicle Gerano
    Machination
    all by blue dot sessions: app.sessions.b...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 13

  • @francescocerasuolo4064
    @francescocerasuolo4064 6 місяців тому +1

    wonderful, wonderful video.

  • @cutterstreeby804
    @cutterstreeby804 3 місяці тому

    More deleuzeeeeeeeere❤❤❤❤

  • @webmasterultra3487
    @webmasterultra3487 11 місяців тому +1

    I like that, “the figurative refers to what their kids could not do competitively,” that is brilliant, and totally hilarious.

  • @lilahbenetti397
    @lilahbenetti397 3 роки тому

    This is really interesting. A great dissection. I really love the idea of reframing within a frame to create the ‘icon’. From what I understood, it gives a certain authority to the audience, offering a reflection of their fundamental interpretation and an anchor point to understanding the entire painting with or without their awareness. Also allowing the figure to embody and wield a sort of power of its own, allowing this meaning to live within the piece, where it’s meaning can change and grow contextually over time. INTERESTING!

    • @FlashbackArrest
      @FlashbackArrest  3 роки тому

      Thanks Lilah. It's so good to read you. Yeah It's a pretty interesting book conceptually but also as an art piece, with its own apparent abstractions that in the end are quite coherent. Deleuze didn't really dealt with the relation to the 'audience' (even by the last chapter), which is something many thinkers would do, especially these days. I actually didn't think about this at all, so thanks for bringing it up. It might be because his interpretation although universal, is a bit hermetic. It's good to use them as points of departure for our own ideas. But yeah I can definitely see how turning subjects into icons can serve as a form of reflection for someone looking at the paintings. And this is in turn will change with time, as we change. Although he might argue that this would be betraying "factual" nature :)

  • @jungastein3952
    @jungastein3952 2 роки тому +1

    the bacon interviews with Sylvester is one of the most interesting books I've ever read, I was obsessed with it after I read it at about 18 or 19 years old and I continued to be obsessed with it for a couple of years reading it over and over. I don't have a copy of it now but I wish I did. Bacon's influence was so heavy, coercive in a way, that I had to get rid of every book I had about bacon and I had a whole library books about Bacon. this is some 35 years later and I really want the Revelations book that was just published and the catalog for Man and Beast at the Royal Academy.

    • @FlashbackArrest
      @FlashbackArrest  2 роки тому +1

      Some figures just loom over us, they seem more alive than ever. Do you paint?

    • @jungastein3952
      @jungastein3952 2 роки тому

      @@FlashbackArrest yes

    • @quantised1703
      @quantised1703 2 роки тому

      @@jungastein3952 can i see your paintings?

  • @meownover1973
    @meownover1973 2 роки тому

    Just found your channel. Subscribed.

  • @joaquinonthebass
    @joaquinonthebass 3 роки тому +1

    Me gusta como editas

  • @webmasterultra3487
    @webmasterultra3487 11 місяців тому

    Goodness gracious, the faults humility is suffocating!!! Don’t be proud of not understanding, especially if you are going to explain a topic to people who love that topic. Other then that you did pretty good. Don’t feel too bad, most people talk out of resentment.

  • @heartache5742
    @heartache5742 2 роки тому

    thanks for introducing me to bacon's paintings via deleuze
    someone else understood what it's like to be a bwo writhing silently on a bed