Idk why I got recommended this video but calling actual engineering stone age and out of sync is pure dumbness. Even if you master all the gpts, copilot and every bs available it is actually easier to learn development from scratch and make stuff yourself. Assuming the ai can make someonething remotely coherent. This is not to bash LLMs, great study tools if you utilize it well but when it comes to not surface level stuff AIs just give up or give factually incorrect answers. From what we are seeing their performances are plateauing even getting worse unironically. Then again free speech to spread bs on the internet when you have a bit of money and a recording setup
1. His first point is not good as AI betterment is a problem of physics and energy and it is stagnating. 2. Your second point is just wrong. Your coding tutorial I saw was just flawed on every spectrum: accessibility, performance, UX, UI, scalability, etc. Engineering is not replaceable. If you don't know a language, you're just inviting security and other compliance issues. 3. AI introduced 40% more bugs. Also, LLMs are not AI. It's a token generation system. 4. Company using AI internally for their own products is one thing. Using it for clients without mentioning it legally to them goes against NDA which is a legal trouble. 5. A 10x engineer will be 15x engineer at best with AI but will remain 10x without it. That's not even an issue. You're advocating for writing novels in English without knowing English as a language. It works until it's not.
Makes sense. But it's still possible to build with focused work. I've seen non coder friends of mine deploy full scale products on Product making $10,000 MRR
@@harshithvaddiparthy No you'll not understand his perspective. To understand his perspective first gain real experience as a software engineer for 10 years. Then you should try doing the same video, you'll then understand. And the mistakes in this video will self enlighten you automatically until then you can only argue with argumentative inexperience perspective. It's like "trying to explain the feeling of sex after practically doing it VS trying to explain the feeling of sex after reading a book/watching porn". Your video is the later.
your 2nd point is wrong and quite frankly BONKERS! Programming experience just doesn't build you a better programmer, but it teaches you the goddamn PHILOSOPHY and Intuition of coding! 👎 You will look at back at this video and cringe hard. That is, if, in case, you grew smart. ]
Idk why I got recommended this video but calling actual engineering stone age and out of sync is pure dumbness. Even if you master all the gpts, copilot and every bs available it is actually easier to learn development from scratch and make stuff yourself. Assuming the ai can make someonething remotely coherent.
This is not to bash LLMs, great study tools if you utilize it well but when it comes to not surface level stuff AIs just give up or give factually incorrect answers. From what we are seeing their performances are plateauing even getting worse unironically. Then again free speech to spread bs on the internet when you have a bit of money and a recording setup
1. His first point is not good as AI betterment is a problem of physics and energy and it is stagnating.
2. Your second point is just wrong. Your coding tutorial I saw was just flawed on every spectrum: accessibility, performance, UX, UI, scalability, etc. Engineering is not replaceable. If you don't know a language, you're just inviting security and other compliance issues.
3. AI introduced 40% more bugs. Also, LLMs are not AI. It's a token generation system.
4. Company using AI internally for their own products is one thing. Using it for clients without mentioning it legally to them goes against NDA which is a legal trouble.
5. A 10x engineer will be 15x engineer at best with AI but will remain 10x without it. That's not even an issue.
You're advocating for writing novels in English without knowing English as a language. It works until it's not.
Makes sense.
But it's still possible to build with focused work.
I've seen non coder friends of mine deploy full scale products on Product making $10,000 MRR
If I could press dislike this video a thousand times, I would
Would love to understand your perspective.
@@harshithvaddiparthy No you'll not understand his perspective. To understand his perspective first gain real experience as a software engineer for 10 years. Then you should try doing the same video, you'll then understand. And the mistakes in this video will self enlighten you automatically until then you can only argue with argumentative inexperience perspective. It's like "trying to explain the feeling of sex after practically doing it VS trying to explain the feeling of sex after reading a book/watching porn". Your video is the later.
@@srinivasannatarajan6589 You ever built a startup?
your 2nd point is wrong and quite frankly BONKERS!
Programming experience just doesn't build you a better programmer, but it teaches you the goddamn PHILOSOPHY and Intuition of coding! 👎
You will look at back at this video and cringe hard. That is, if, in case, you grew smart. ]
Questionable take 👎
Why?
👎👎👎
why?
👎👎👎
What was wrong Srinivas?