As we say in Persian, "𝗢𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝘂𝘇𝘇𝗹𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘃𝗲𝗱, 𝗶𝘁 𝘀𝗲𝗲𝗺𝘀 𝘀𝗼 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲 معما چون حل گشت آسان شود" Or in another form, "simple, but impossible", which is when you find yourself saying, 'why didn’t I think of that?' This card trick is a perfect example of that idea. The method is straightforward once you know it, 𝘆𝗲𝘁 𝗶𝘁'𝘀 𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗶𝘁𝘆.Thank you for sharing this with such a clear explanation-well done on making it both easy to follow and impressive to watch!
Definitely one of the cleanest.! Love it ❤️ - My only change-up on the routine would be to let the spectator get involved a bit more , especially at 2nd half part . Also , I would pop 2 out from the spread at a time and ask spectator to holler red/ black - black/ red - or red / red - black / black .. This has so many great possibilities. Again , thanks. I subscribed and 👍
I quite often pull out 2 and go 'here's 2 the same colour, what do you reckon, red or black?'. You can do that multiple times throughout the routine and it speeds things up a bit
I think your version is cleaner than picking up two packets or one card and moving it around. Taking the card out once the packet is reassembled is much more sneaky and despite knowing what to expect I missed it and had to rewatch to see it.
This is a nice trick. The only problem in the video is that in performance, at the end, when you pull out the ace of diamonds from the bottom of the deck, it's out of camera view. You demonstrate the move in the tutorial and that makes it clear. However, because it's off camera in the performance there is no way to compare the performance with the tutorial. When learning the tutorial for these card tricks, it's really helpful to go back to the performance to view the move. But when it's hidden from view it kind of makes it difficult to put it all together. But, it's still a very clever trick.
Fantastic version of this amazing classic trick! Thanks for the tutorial, I'll definitely try it out some time. The fact that it's an impromptu trick makes it so amazing and powerful. Great idea 🔥 I really enjoyed your performance, it was great 👍 Very smoothly done. In my opinion, the second method (the tutorial) is better just because, it looks more casually and I feel like it's less noticeable as you fooled me in the performance 😂 Nice trick mate! Keep up the great work 💪
this is an excellent presentation of the trick. coincidentally (?), I performed a nearly identical version of this today, even before watching your video. it blew my laymen spectators out of the water. ...but i believe there is a far more simple and convincing method for revealing the crooked pile.
@@crashmagic scoop up the crooked pile from the top down, except for the very top indicator card. then turn all the cards in your hand upside down, and drop them face up on top of the indicator card.
Nice approach, but, credit where it's due: the simultaneous invention of an impromptu version of the great Paurry effect should be credited to Harry Loryane and U.F. Grant who each independently worked out this method. I DO like your idea of using a half deck!
The simplest way to handle any version of this trick is to make sure the two correct piles are the closest to the spectator then for the reveal say "let's see how you did". Make it collaborative. They pick up "their" cards (handling them, which a lovely convincer) and they distract themselves while you can casually stumblebum the switch with "your" cards. No need for any fancy manoeuvres for a rather pointless recap. It's a long trick - they know what's been going on and why. This version has the advantages of no set up and brevity but the disadvantage that you are actually looking at the cards you offer for them to choose. It's a bit of a weakness. For the longer version you have to be quite a good entertainer to maintain focus. Towards the end you can say "this is taking a while" and pretend to batch the remainder for a bulk choice. You can also pretend to be nervous and start looking at the cards after they've chosen to check, "correct" them a couple of times, then tell them to take a drink and pull themselves together. But in general you really have to "play" them a bit. It also isn't generally a good idea to risk letting them self deal at any point.
@@crashmagic its in his book…think he sells it as a sep effect on his site..no setup, spec full shuffle deck with cards turned anyway they want face up n down THEN handed to you as effect BEGINS…best ever! YT. Vid of him performing it
Are there any no set up variations of this routine where nobody looks at the cards until the end AND with no sneaky moves near the end before the reveal? That would be my favorite version.
So... The best way to do this is to use a tapered deck. That way you can shuffle non stop, then go through the cards face up with the spectators, so they can see the cards are mixed up and the image is burned in their mind. While you ask them a question (I ask if they've had psychic experiences), strip the cards with one quick movement, leaving all the reds on top and blacks on bottom. You don't have to look at the cards. Everyone has just seen them mixed. I learned this from James Randi. Type "James Randi card trick" into UA-cam to find a full performance. Hope you use this!
One of the most unreasonable things we do during almost every OOTW version is the card color swap half way through. I actually am working on the pretense of using all four suits as an out . - in other words, play one card face up from the beginning, but just use the top two piles for separation and then later , say OK, let's work on these two now. You wouldn't specifically have to call out the separation as dividing by suits , but it is a very fitting excuse . You might want to just call out the 2 suits used at first and say , hey , we've had a hearts and spades pile going on, so let's switch it around with clubs and diamonds. At this point you inadvertently change the color sequence below at the same time you put down the 2 different suits . 🎩
He missed the whole justification and a stronger way to finish the sorting after the switch. You have the spectator deal all of the remaining cards themselves in the 2nd half and that gives you the justification: "You're doing so well, and I don't want you to think I have anything to do with this. Why don't deal each card face down on the side where you think it belongs. Let's keep track of where you took over without me touching the cards at all." Along these lines, everything is fully justified and logical and more impressive. Why he continued to deal as the performer really confuses me. Also, the ending swap is much simpler and cleaner. I also do several convincers, such as telling them I saw one card which was on the wrong side and want to give them a chance to redeem themselves. "There was one incorrect card on this side (pointing to the side that's all incorrect). Which one do you feel was incorrect?" Swap that card, flipping it over, to show it indeed was on the wrong side. "But all the rest of these were 100% correct " turn over all cards on correct side, showing them. (One half at a time). "And all of these were also correct" (turning over all cards on incorrect side at once as one pile, except for the first marker card, then spread cards and show they all match). Much cleaner ending and fully justified and covered "moves".
Thanks the key to success seems to be to pick them up in the right order!
So führe ich das seit den 80er vor 💪
Subscribed. Thanks for taking the time
@@nathanwhouston thank you and glad you liked it 👍
An absolute classic! This version is really good, I'll definitely try it out! 😀👏
Thanks and glad you like it 🙂👍
You can also use a certain triumph effect to setup the cards right in front of the spectator to perform the classic OOTW. :)
As we say in Persian, "𝗢𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝘂𝘇𝘇𝗹𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘃𝗲𝗱, 𝗶𝘁 𝘀𝗲𝗲𝗺𝘀 𝘀𝗼 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲 معما چون حل گشت آسان شود" Or in another form, "simple, but impossible", which is when you find yourself saying, 'why didn’t I think of that?' This card trick is a perfect example of that idea. The method is straightforward once you know it, 𝘆𝗲𝘁 𝗶𝘁'𝘀 𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗶𝘁𝘆.Thank you for sharing this with such a clear explanation-well done on making it both easy to follow and impressive to watch!
@@bijanghofranian5782 thank you so much for your kind comment 🙂👍
Magnuficent 👍🍺
Definitely one of the cleanest.! Love it ❤️ - My only change-up on the routine would be to let the spectator get involved a bit more , especially at 2nd half part . Also , I would pop 2 out from the spread at a time and ask spectator to holler red/ black - black/ red - or red / red - black / black .. This has so many great possibilities. Again , thanks. I subscribed and 👍
Thanks and some great ideas 🙂👍
I quite often pull out 2 and go 'here's 2 the same colour, what do you reckon, red or black?'. You can do that multiple times throughout the routine and it speeds things up a bit
Hreat trick, a classic. Wonderful tutorial 😊👍😊👍
Thanks Robert 👍
Best one I’ve seen. Thanks
one of my favourite classic card trick and you performed it really well, great job my friend
Thanks 👍
Nicely done! Definitely a classic 👍
Thanks Tim 👍
Well done mate great,i like the you way did out of this world even more convincing because shuffled deck very nice.
Thank you. So many great versions of this trick, but this is a really good impromptu version 👍
I think your version is cleaner than picking up two packets or one card and moving it around.
Taking the card out once the packet is reassembled is much more sneaky and despite knowing what to expect I missed it and had to rewatch to see it.
Thanks. Glad you liked this method 🙂👍
Love a no set-up trick - even better when it’s Out of this World. Killer!
Thanks so much and couldn't agree more 🙂👍
This is a nice trick. The only problem in the video is that in performance, at the end, when you pull out the ace of diamonds from the bottom of the deck, it's out of camera view. You demonstrate the move in the tutorial and that makes it clear. However, because it's off camera in the performance there is no way to compare the performance with the tutorial. When learning the tutorial for these card tricks, it's really helpful to go back to the performance to view the move. But when it's hidden from view it kind of makes it difficult to put it all together. But, it's still a very clever trick.
Fantastic version of this amazing classic trick! Thanks for the tutorial, I'll definitely try it out some time. The fact that it's an impromptu trick makes it so amazing and powerful. Great idea 🔥 I really enjoyed your performance, it was great 👍 Very smoothly done.
In my opinion, the second method (the tutorial) is better just because, it looks more casually and I feel like it's less noticeable as you fooled me in the performance 😂
Nice trick mate! Keep up the great work 💪
As always great to read your comments and glad you liked it 🙂👍
neat trick mate
Fænomenalt card trick 👍
this is an excellent presentation of the trick. coincidentally (?), I performed a nearly identical version of this today, even before watching your video. it blew my laymen spectators out of the water. ...but i believe there is a far more simple and convincing method for revealing the crooked pile.
Thanks and what a coincidence 🙂. You willing to share your method for the end?
@@crashmagic scoop up the crooked pile from the top down, except for the very top indicator card. then turn all the cards in your hand upside down, and drop them face up on top of the indicator card.
@@Laurencetw I like the sound of that method and I'll give it a go. Thanks 👍
Nice approach, but, credit where it's due: the simultaneous invention of an impromptu version of the great Paurry effect should be credited to Harry Loryane and U.F. Grant who each independently worked out this method. I DO like your idea of using a half deck!
Glad you liked it and thanks for the info on the origin 👍
Thanks. But, your switch in the performance section was off camera.Great explanation.
Off camera is the best place to do the switch 😀
Excellent point! Thanks for the video!
The simplest way to handle any version of this trick is to make sure the two correct piles are the closest to the spectator then for the reveal say "let's see how you did". Make it collaborative. They pick up "their" cards (handling them, which a lovely convincer) and they distract themselves while you can casually stumblebum the switch with "your" cards. No need for any fancy manoeuvres for a rather pointless recap. It's a long trick - they know what's been going on and why.
This version has the advantages of no set up and brevity but the disadvantage that you are actually looking at the cards you offer for them to choose. It's a bit of a weakness. For the longer version you have to be quite a good entertainer to maintain focus. Towards the end you can say "this is taking a while" and pretend to batch the remainder for a bulk choice. You can also pretend to be nervous and start looking at the cards after they've chosen to check, "correct" them a couple of times, then tell them to take a drink and pull themselves together. But in general you really have to "play" them a bit. It also isn't generally a good idea to risk letting them self deal at any point.
NOBODYs OOTW is better than Michael Murrays….KING OF ALL TIME👍👍👍👍👍
I'm definitely going to check that out. Thanks 👍
@@crashmagic its in his book…think he sells it as a sep effect on his site..no setup, spec full shuffle deck with cards turned anyway they want face up n down THEN handed to you as effect BEGINS…best ever! YT. Vid of him performing it
Are there any no set up variations of this routine where nobody looks at the cards until the end AND with no sneaky moves near the end before the reveal? That would be my favorite version.
If you find that version, let me know 😃
So... The best way to do this is to use a tapered deck. That way you can shuffle non stop, then go through the cards face up with the spectators, so they can see the cards are mixed up and the image is burned in their mind. While you ask them a question (I ask if they've had psychic experiences), strip the cards with one quick movement, leaving all the reds on top and blacks on bottom. You don't have to look at the cards. Everyone has just seen them mixed. I learned this from James Randi. Type "James Randi card trick" into UA-cam to find a full performance. Hope you use this!
@@crashmagic it's called a stripper deck 😆
Your method is similar to UF Grant's version.
One of the most unreasonable things we do during almost every OOTW version is the card color swap half way through. I actually am working on the pretense of using all four suits as an out . - in other words, play one card face up from the beginning, but just use the top two piles for separation and then later , say OK, let's work on these two now. You wouldn't specifically have to call out the separation as dividing by suits , but it is a very fitting excuse . You might want to just call out the 2 suits used at first and say , hey , we've had a hearts and spades pile going on, so let's switch it around with clubs and diamonds. At this point you inadvertently change the color sequence below at the same time you put down the 2 different suits . 🎩
That sounds like a great idea 👍
He missed the whole justification and a stronger way to finish the sorting after the switch. You have the spectator deal all of the remaining cards themselves in the 2nd half and that gives you the justification: "You're doing so well, and I don't want you to think I have anything to do with this. Why don't deal each card face down on the side where you think it belongs. Let's keep track of where you took over without me touching the cards at all." Along these lines, everything is fully justified and logical and more impressive. Why he continued to deal as the performer really confuses me. Also, the ending swap is much simpler and cleaner. I also do several convincers, such as telling them I saw one card which was on the wrong side and want to give them a chance to redeem themselves. "There was one incorrect card on this side (pointing to the side that's all incorrect). Which one do you feel was incorrect?" Swap that card, flipping it over, to show it indeed was on the wrong side. "But all the rest of these were 100% correct " turn over all cards on correct side, showing them. (One half at a time). "And all of these were also correct" (turning over all cards on incorrect side at once as one pile, except for the first marker card, then spread cards and show they all match). Much cleaner ending and fully justified and covered "moves".
Horror Hotel & you're the desk clerk with no vacancy