Hey guys! Wow, I never could have imagined any one of my videos reaching this level of popularity! Not only that, but having a healthy dialogue about issues is a great thing, and I appreciate it. For some folks, the "flag waving" issue has sparked interests in the so-called Apollo Moon landing hoax. There are a few articles that detail some interesting points, but with an understanding of physics in zero-gravity with no friction or wind we can actually understand perfectly why the flag waves. I found an interesting article to read and hope to hear your thoughts: www.quora.com/Since-there-is-no-wind-or-atmosphere-on-the-Moon-how-can-the-US-flag-be-flapping-in-pictures-of-the-first-Moon-landing Let me know if you have any questions, I'm here to talk!
Curivity I'm impressed that you've remained active on the same account for so long! I don't believe the moon landing was fake but I am wondering why no stars are visible. I'm sorry a majority of the comments are in complete denial of one of the most amazing scientific achievements of mankind. Great video!
Professional Dimwhit I was always a believer. But look at the noted times ( 4:05, 4:11-4:18+4:07 5:03-5:12) that prove otherwise 😞I recently visited a university well known for its space/science program and who houses one of the top telescopes, which had a supposed "original" print of the astronauts. I didn't understand why people didn't believe we went to the Moon....until I noticed the cables in that picture even. For once ever, my brain almost exploded. I back burnered it though until recently when I had time to really research NASAs footage and all of the media from back then, and even here in this one. Look at the cables and mirrors clearly in this footage 😞 I always was a believer til I saw this and all of the rest of the "authentic" footage. If you keep your eye on the top of their backbags- you can see the cables that created the anti gravity Effect..in almost every shot no less. Look at the astronaut (A) on the left 4:05, 4:11-4:18+ (not to mention the flag waving on its own in real time-which wouldn't be possible)---then 4:07 Astronaut (B). Closeup at 5:03-5:12. Then the mirror anomalies show up throughout all of their "work", but mostly seeing the wires, and the "tenting" effect caused by the cables being pulled Upward are unmistakable to miss😢 Also, I always had wondered as a kid with them noticing around like that, how come they never sounded the least bit exerted? They're hacking away at the surface and jumping around and yet it's like their commentary was done while lying down. Oh geez, talk about the "jumping and falling"..on the original footage where one of them falls, the cable is pulled too tightly and quickly and you'll watch him being flown upwards without footing! His foot literally flies in front of him. And then you can see Both of their wires and that tenting effect closeup again. Be prepared to wonder why we didn't notice that before since it is so obvious now, other than Trust. Then there's a shot with a bag attached to the ship and while one walks by it, in slo-mo obviously, the bag swings at regular speed until they notice it and quickly remove it all together and place it on top.; literally he unclipped it from its safe hanging place for easy access, to the top, to avoid it swinging again. The Mirroring material is constantly happening in every piece of footage there is too. So sad. But...I also understand how important it was for Us to be the first to reach the moon, in a time of super powers competing for the top position and Russia was just too damn close (apparently), so we had to do "something". Either/or, it's still brilliance. A mass deception? yes. But one desperately needed at a time when it was perhaps of monumental importance to remain "#1". The major problem is if they have lied to us about one of our most important accomplishments...seriously, this is on one of the largest proportionate scales..what else to they lie to us about? I know for me it made me RE- search the more important "scientifically proven" claims now. My eyes and mind have been forcibly opened. I only hope that all of us do this since we are told to always seek the truth..as the truth will be what sets us free. Make up your own mind when viewing all of the footage.
Curivity I was always a believer. But look at the noted times ( 4:05, 4:11-4:18+4:07 5:03-5:12) that prove otherwise 😞I recently visited a university well known for its space/science program and who houses one of the top telescopes, which had a supposed "original" print of the astronauts. I didn't understand why people didn't believe we went to the Moon....until I noticed the cables in that picture even. For once ever, my brain almost exploded. I back burnered it though until recently when I had time to really research NASAs footage and all of the media from back then, and even here in this one. Look at the cables and mirrors clearly in this footage 😞 I always was a believer til I saw this and all of the rest of the "authentic" footage. If you keep your eye on the top of their backbags- you can see the cables that created the anti gravity Effect..in almost every shot no less. Look at the astronaut (A) on the left 4:05, 4:11-4:18+ (not to mention the flag waving QUICKLY is the problem in real time-which wouldn't be possible- a "wave" yes. But it wouldn't be able to snap so quickly/sharply-they fail to mention the speed at which it moves in all of the physics explanations, rather staying focused on its just moving on its own)---then 4:07 Astronaut (B). Closeup at 5:03-5:12. Then the mirror anomalies show up throughout all of their "work", but mostly seeing the wires, and the "tenting" effect caused by the cables being pulled Upward are unmistakable to miss😢 Also, I always had wondered as a kid with them noticing around like that, how come they never sounded the least bit exerted? They're hacking away at the surface and jumping around and yet it's like their commentary was done while lying down. Oh geez, talk about the "jumping and falling"..on the original footage where one of them falls, the cable is pulled too tightly and quickly and you'll watch him being flown upwards without footing! His foot literally flies in front of him. And then you can see Both of their wires and that tenting effect closeup again. Be prepared to wonder why we didn't notice that before since it is so obvious now, other than Trust. Then there's a shot with a bag attached to the ship and while one walks by it, in slo-mo obviously, the bag swings at regular speed until they notice it and quickly remove it all together and place it on top.; literally he unclipped it from its safe hanging place for easy access, to the top, to avoid it swinging again. The Mirroring material is constantly happening in every piece of footage there is too. So sad. But...I also understand how important it was for Us to be the first to reach the moon, in a time of super powers competing for the top position and Russia was just too damn close (apparently), so we had to do "something". Either/or, it's still brilliance. A mass deception? yes. But one desperately needed at a time when it was perhaps of monumental importance to remain "#1". The major problem is if they have lied to us about one of our most important accomplishments...seriously, this is on one of the largest proportionate scales..what else to they lie to us about? I know for me it made me RE- search the more important "scientifically proven" claims now. My eyes and mind have been forcibly opened. I only hope that all of us do this since we are told to always seek the truth..as the truth will be what sets us free. Make up your own mind when viewing all of the footage.
I wonder if Armstrong told his wife after the “landing”: ‘Honey, I never landed on the moon.’ Because the lunar landing is a great hoax, you understand.
fun fact when neil armstrong was thinking of what his first words would be on the moon surface during the Apollo 11 landing, command module pilot Michael collins jokingly suggested: "if you had any balls, you'd say "oh my god, what is that thing!" then scream and cut your mic."
I want NASA to livestream astronauts going to the moon and one of them will say "oh my god what is that!-" and cut the mic 10 seconds before the livestream ends.
Psycho They know there’s no wind they Installed a mechanism to keep the flag straight but there was a mistake so it ended up having that permanent ripple as it was in very low gravity
@bekzodbob I think he is talking about the one astronaut that was left behind in the CSM, orbiting the moon while the other two landed on the moon in the LM
I want to know who the team that filmed this was. Imagine recording the Apollo leaving the moon back to Earth without you being inside so you could capture the moment. Spectacular, I hope they went back for whoever it was
Have you done some internet 'research' to find out how the footage of the Apollo ascent stage was filmed leaving the lunar surface, or are you quite content to just make yourself look like an ignorant fool by claiming that it's fake?
The moon landing was shameless fraud. The guy who shot appolo 11 footage was Stanley Kubrick the top Hollywood director of his time, his 1980 movie "The Shining" was his confession that he helped staged the 1969 moon
We went to the Moon? OK, on every Apollo landing mission, the crew were out of their suits, for hours on end ( maybe days on end). How can this be. If you say batteries, like Alan Bean, I will laugh at you, I promise. Even 13 had astros out of their suits for seemingly most of the time. & Apollo 13 only had a few amps an hour to use. i know, MAGIC! & of course for years now, America must use a Russian agency to even get into low Earth orbit.
Here are the types of computerisation that was used back then. *The Launch Vehicle Digital Computer* (LVDC) was a computer that provided the autopilot for the Saturn V rocket from launch to Earth orbit insertion. Designed and manufactured by IBM's Electronics Systems Center in Owego, New York, it was one of the major components of the Instrument Unit, fitted to the S-IVB stage of the Saturn V and Saturn IB rockets. The LVDC also supported pre- and post-launch checkout of the Saturn hardware. It was used in conjunction with the Launch Vehicle Data Adaptor (LVDA) which performed signal conditioning from the sensor inputs to the computer from the launch vehicle. *The Apollo Guidance Computer* (AGC) was a digital computer produced for the Apollo program that was installed on board each Apollo command module (CM) and Apollo Lunar Module (LM). The AGC provided computation and electronic interfaces for guidance, navigation, and control of the spacecraft. The AGC was the first computer based on silicon integrated circuits. Unlike the more delicate circuit systems of the modern computerised Guidance System of Artemis 1 ect, the Apollo on board Computers were 'old school' and quite robust against the radiation from outside the Apollo Command Module ect. The computer's performance was comparable to the first generation of home computers from the late 1970s, such as the Apple II, TRS-80, and Commodore PET. Learn about things in an honest way. Get educated. Try to do better.
The Apollo computers were simple sequence machines. The heavy computing was done on Earth at Houston and MIT then uploaded to the spacecraft computer with the latest figures. NASA had been doing this during the Gemini program as well.
We can go back and are going back. It just costs a LOT of money. Google the Artemis missions. Artemis 1 has already been back to the moon and back in Nov. 2022 unmanned. # 2 will be with people and #3 will again land on the moon. (Facts)
@@Europa-Last-Battle_on_Bitchute Dude you’re obviously being manipulated, do you really think they would release footage that had a rat on it for goodness sake?
When you first think of the moon landings, it seems pretty basic. But imagine being the astronauts being able to firsthand experience a place that is quite literally otherworldly.
I remember watching the moon landing with my Grandma,Mother, brother and sister we were up north at her cabin watching Neil and Buzz bouncing on the moon. I can't believe it has been 50 years! I also had a meeting with Jim Lovell at the MOA
Aww thats a sweet memory. My Auntie was telling me her first memory the other day. When she was very young, her dad picked her up so she could see the moon and said "there really is a man on the moon now".
Remember when cell phones came out? Even today, they occasionally cut out. Back then, the president used a landmine to talk to the moon??? I just can't buy that.
We actually now try to take precautions to make sure no living things are on anything we send into space, because if there is anything living out there then it could react negatively to earth life.
1969:We landed on the MOON!!! 2019:We got the first picture of a black hole!!!! Also 2019:The moon landing was fake! 2045:The picture of the black hole was fake!!!!
lmao,but we got lucky, Neil was a gifted astronaught, look at his gemini flight how he saved himself by staying calm, if we got an astronaught like that again we would probably go
@myusernamesthisdealwithit I don't know if there already is a reply directed to you but I'll still reply, The Flag was held up by a horizontal pole and was waving because the Astronaut was moving it. There also is another answer to that in the pinned comment.
Apollo proof: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the moon landing missions. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal
@@hariskhan6494 it's not a failure..... We tried many nation don't think also to go to the southern part of moon in this budget...... We achieved we achieved respect.......we should not cry like this just have a smile on your face.....atleast we tried 😊
I can't believe that... Those people risked their lives to land on the moon and now some 9 years old kids genius say it is fake. I wanna launch a rocket full of this geniuses straight to the sun
Half of a trillion dollars goes to feeding the illegals, not to science or bettering ourselves. To the third world scum who steal from us, what our forefathers gifted to us. More money, on top of the $500 billion goes to negroes and white trash for them to live drugged up and work free. Moon landings won’t ever happen again, so just stay nostalgic
Indeed! If we survived the Black Plague and probably also the Ice age? WW1, WW2, Cuban crisis and etc. then I don't see the reason why we can't survive this Covid..
@Richard Gomez yes,humans can be dumb sometimes but that is what makes us humans. We become dumb sometimes and make mistakes and learn from it. Its part of life
WE ARE U.S. CITIZENS. CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES. THE UNITED STATES IS A COUNTRY BUT AMERICA ITS NOT A COUNTRY AMERICA ITS A CONTINENT. THE WHOLE ENTIRE CONTINENT WAS NAME AMERICA 269 YEARS WAY BEFORE THE UNITED STATES BECAME A NATION.
@@blurzie8618 EXACTLY. I THINK THE U.S. GOVERNMENT IS LYING. BECAUSE THE IMAGES DON'T SHOW NO STARS. ITS ALL DARK. NOW THE U.S. FLAG MOVES. I THOUGHT THERE'S NO WIND UP THERE.
It's amazing how this was the result of a competition between two global superpower countries but despite it, both sides could agree going to space and exploring it is an achievement for both sides. Im glad this was recommended to me, I always adore the outer space.
There are so many comments on Apollo-11 moon landing regarding its authenticity. I myself was in the U.S in 1969 as a Ph.D. Student in Aerospace Engineering at a top ranking U.S. University. We all closely followed the Moon landing mission with keen interest, particularly so being an Aerospace Engineer. T.V. Live coverage in the national channel ABC was non-stop continuously for the last four days , Michael Collins in the Command Module, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin in the lunar module. Then the historical landing on the moon. It should be mentioned that lift off from the moon surface was not a big issue as it had a powerful rocket thruster and gravity is 1/6 of earth, so it could be properly designed. Looking at the entire mission, it never appeared to us that the entire show is fake. Later we visited NASA Houston and shaw the original Command module which returned back to earth. It is unfortunate that people make the comments without knowing anything. Later moon landing mission was not tried as it was then thought of unmanned flight which might be more useful. Apollo-14 commander John Young was our friend in the University. The subsequent mission continued till Apollo-17, though NASA had two more Saturn-5 boosters. Above comments are just for those who need to understand much more about Aeronautics. Well this subject is not a child’s play item and making useless remarks. Ar
Thanks Mr. Prasun for your valuable and most authentic inputs. And at the same time whatever evidence of Truth you produce, you cannot correct some most hardened and learned fools.
Solar wind wouldn't really affect the flag as it isn't very refective. The flag continues to move because of the momentum it gained from being shaken as it was put in the ground.
There's just something awesome listening to music from the 1600's while watching a space mission from the 1970's in 2019. Really goes to show how some of mankind's greatest achievements truly are timeless.
People in the 60s: saw the moon landing made up a bunch of scientists and smart people. And believed it. People afterwards: saw a thing on the Internet about flags in space. And denied everything nasa worked on for decades
for all of you who are debating about the flag "wavering" who clearly haven't read the pinned comment don't you think that if they were making a proper movie they could have just taken 5 minutes to reshoot the scene why would they leave it in if its waving? the only evidence you have is just pointing at easily fixable things and saying "flag wave so that must mean air" when it is literally explained in the pinned comment and if it does mean its "fake" why didn't the soviet union point it out this literally would be a free shot at America that would ruin the governments reputation
Humans can be the most fascinating and brilliant species on earth by looking at this video but can also be the most ignorant and stupid by looking at these comments.
Edgar Siller no you know what is arrogant, you not keeping an open mind and calling people who don’t believe in your point of view arrogant. There is multiple reasons why it could be fake and multiple reasons why it could be real. governments from other civilisations in the past have spread huge lies, do you know that radiation belts would of destroyed those cameras
@@ballsackmgee3387 multiple other countries have just up an verified we made it. australia for instance verified our launch, and Russia never disputed the fact we made it. How would we have gotten them to lie? threaten to nuke them if they unless they patted us on the back?
@@ballsackmgee3387 The radiation belt isn't equally strong all around the earth, they simply picked the area with the weakest radiation, which is weak enough to go through without major damage.
What brave guys. For those in denial, they left a laser defector on the moon in 1969, an observatory in Texas still sends and measures a return beam 240 times a year since then.
I bet that defector wasn't too happy when they left him on the moon... that's pretty mean. The word you're looking for is REflector. They left a laser reflector on the Moon.
Paul, why would we want to spend more money on new Robotic technology when we can just send people there anyways, making both strides in Space Travel and Hitting the Moon?
No. Robots need to be invented, correct? It is only 1960. They don't nearly have the same amount of complexity as they have today, especially in those motions of the video.
@chadgroyper1776 "what makes you believe it’s real?" Science! Scientific PROOF of the Moon Landings. 1) The most compelling evidence is the analysis of the lunar rock specimens, undertaken around the world. They returned almost 400 kilograms of moon rocks, (and 6 foot core samples) over 1000 times as much as the Soviets were able to retrieve via robotic missions. Both sets of rocks match. Nasa gave more than 15,000 samples of moon rocks to more than 100 countries following lunar missions in 1969 and the 1970, these samples studied around the world not just at NASA or even US research organizations, are definitely and distinctive composition than any terrestrial rock. Every scientist who has studied these rocks has accepted that they are of non-terrestrial origin and there is no peer-reviewed article that contradicts the claim they are from the moon. Where did the Moon rocks come from if not from the Moon? 2) The massive amount of data the lunar landings returned. These were scientific missions you realize. How could NASA fake all this data w/o actually being on the moon? This data has been studied for over 40 years and much has been verified since by other countries/crafts. Where did this massive amount of scientific data come from if they never went to the Moon? 3) In addition to the direct personal testimony of eighteen men who went to the Moon from Apollo 11 on, there are mountains of detailed engineering and program management documentations, technical analyses, and still and video footage, hundreds of tons of flight hardware, signals from retro reflectors and experiment packages placed on the Moon by hand, and of course the tracking of signals around and on the Moon by amateurs as well as allies and rivals of the U.S. 4) The Ultraviolet photos taken from the moon’s surface. Until the lunar landings NO ONE knew what the universe looked like in UV light. The Earth gives off to much UV to allow photos on Earth or in Earth orbit. The joint Belgian/British/Dutch satellite TD-1 later scanned the sky for stars that are bright in UV light. The TD-1 data obtained is a match for the Apollo 16 photographs. Further since they also photographed the Earth in UV it is a simple matter to correlate when and where the UV photos were taken, exactly when NASA says they were taken and on the moon. 5) Tracking stations around the world, hired by Nasa (and others on their own) to send and receive the transmission signals between Houston and Moon (as Earth turned different ones would pick up duties) knew their antenna was pointed at the moon, and knew the expected delay in the signal. If there was no astronaut on moon (or at least in lunar orbit) the signal would have been twice the delay. Math doesn't lie, and this proves at least someone was in lunar orbit. 6) The significant numbers of non-NASA employees, including facilities such as the Deep Space Network, which employed (and still employs) many local citizens in Spain and Australia, and facilities such as the Parkes Observatory, which were hired by NASA for specific tasks, but staffed by non-NASA personnel. 7) Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiment Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. 8) The detection on Earth of reflections from laser ranging retro-reflectors (LRRRs, or mirrors used as targets for Earth-based tracking lasers) on Lunar Laser Ranging experiments left on the Moon. 9) In 2008, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) SELENE lunar probe obtained several photographs showing evidence of Moon landings. The 3D images were a match of Apollo photographs. 10) The Terrain Mapping Camera of India's Chandrayaan-1 probe recorded evidence of lighter, disturbed soil around the Apollo 15 site. 11) NASA had no idea of the exact landscapes when they took the Apollo photos in 1969... and then JAXA (Japan Space Agency) mapped the entire lunar topography. EACH and EVERY photo of the thousands taken on the Apollo missions matched perfectly with what Japan had just discovered. Irrefutable proofs of a manned moon landing. There is simply no way one could have known without actually being on the moon. 12) The Soviet Union monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, which was "fully equipped with the latest intelligence-gathering and surveillance equipment." Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered," describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. The missions were tracked by radar from several countries on the way to the Moon and back. 13) Aside from NASA, a number of entities and individuals observed, through various means, the Apollo missions as they took place. NASA released information to the public explaining where third party observers could expect to see the various craft at specific times according to scheduled launch times and planned trajectories. 14) At the height of the Cold War, winning the space race represented a massive feather in the ideological cap of the anti-Communists. As such, if there had been any way to discredit the United States, you can be sure the Soviet Union would have found it. The political damage they could have wrought would have been enormous had they been able to discredit the moon landings. Given that the Soviets were still suffering from the embarrassing climb-down of the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, any opportunity that would have allowed them to embarrass the United States would surely have been grasped with both hands. The fact that in the 40 years since that momentous occasion in human history, not one person from the Soviet camp has produced evidence to dispute the veracity of the moon landings, is as telling as any other evidence you care to name. It has been suggested that the Soviets were in on the hoax; this is too ludicrous for words, especially in an era when tensions between the two countries were so high. It is suggesting complicity in something which would be immensely damaging to their own regime, and that's simply absurd. Forget the arguments; the deafening silence from the Soviet camp is as incontrovertible as any other evidence. 15) It seems obvious to the point of absurdity, but the sheer number of photographs -- none of which show anything terrestrial -- is pretty compelling evidence. The sheer number of photographs which were taken, and the absence of anything more than weak circumstantial evidence, is a strong argument. 16) The the sheer scale of the project would have made it impossible to keep everybody quiet. Over the course of the Apollo project, he estimates that over 400,000 people, or the equivalent of a small city, were involved in working on the project. The odds of every single one of them choosing to keep silent for over forty years, and not producing any evidence, or a memoir, or an overheard conversation suggesting the landings were faked. 17) Why would the U.S fake it SIX times, if we faked it?" It is a pertinent question and it does seem that if you are going to tell a lie, it is far easier to do it once and then stop, than to keep exaggerating the lie over the course of the next few years. Sooner or later somebody would have made a mistake to give the game away. The fact that nobody did, again, illustrates the fact that indeed, these astronauts did make it to the moon. 18) Using photographs, video, NASA documents, and maps of the Moon, a team from Nvidia rebuilt the entire lunar landing using the Unreal Engine. After that painstaking work was finished, they used the new GTX 980, sporting Maxwell GPU architecture to address some of the beef that non-believers have with the landing. Namely, the lighting issues. Every lighting issue was put to rest as Nvidia found NO lighting anomalies. And that proves-YET AGAIN-that we definitely certainly and absolutely put men on the Moon. 19) The fact that NO radiation study ever published has stated radiation would make the Apollo landings impossible and IN FACT most state that a short Apollo style trip to the moon, radiation would not be an operational hazard. 20) The trajectory of lunar regolith thrown up by the Moon buggy and astronauts fell back to the ground as one would expect in a vacuum, ANYWHERE on Earth the dust would of billowed. 21) The trajectory of articles thrown in the videos has been mathematically proven to fall at a rate consistent with 1/6th Earth gravity. ANSWER ANY OF THOSE!
In our age, science is progressing, the size of space and the world is astonishing, this has shown us that the creator of the world is also a great work of art.❤
Wish I could’ve seen this live, it must’ve been so beautiful. If we make it to the moon again, with today’s technology the footage should be even more incredible.
he's moving the flag,,,,,, for the same reason the astronauts bounce because of low gravity and no air resistance, plus almost 0 air pressure, once the flag begins to move there is very little resistance to stop it,,, inertia = an object in motion well remain in motion unless acted on by an outside force.....on the moon the outside force is very minimal ...... so yes you can say it was waving but not because wind, but because of inertia...........hope this clears up that mystery ,, you 6th grade science teacher should have done it,,,,,, cheers 😁
Totally forgot the flag theory go right to NASA it self , why are they spending billions of dollars in research to find ways to pass through the Van Allen radiation belts... after all we already have done it twice right .. 100% fake ..
You misunderstood inertia. Inertia is the resistance of an acceleration or an deacceleration in an object with mass. What you thought was inertia is the first of Newtons laws of motion.
this is the definition ... property of matter by which it continues in its existing state of rest or uniform motion in a straight line, unless that state is changed by an external force. ... and ,,, this is what i said........ an object in motion well remain in motion unless acted on by an outside force... that's real close,,, i did not copy and paste the definition when i said it...........I could of..but it's the same thing .hope this helps,,,have a great day😊 @@themachinehead4421
2990rick Yeah, and thats the definition of Newtons first law of motion. Not inertia. As I said, inertia is the resistance for change in motion due to mass. This is a part of Newtons second law. Example: 1 Newton of force is needed to push an object with a mass of 1kg to 1 m/s squared. If the object has a mass of two kilograms, twice the force is needed to push it to the same speed. If the object’s mass is 0.5 kg, 0.5 N are needed to push it to a velocity of 1 m/s squared. Hope you understand. The higher mass the object has, more force is needed to accelerate and the more inertia the object has.
NintendopePokemonFreak Ruben if you look closely at some of the letters in your name you get: Nintendope Pokemon Freak Which pretty much sums it up I’d say.
Being on the Moon must really feel wonderful for them, they stepped on land that has been untouched for over a few billion years and they are the first to touch this uncharted land outside the Earth. To feel so weird being so far away from Earth, so far away from home.
@@bariohuli145 the background song used was like the sound from the telephone when a call center told you to wait for a while (put on hold) .. so i said hold for 5 mins when u put on hold, it was so long haha
It's always the people that defend the moon landing that are the angriest. I believe it's completely fake, but I don't wish you any harm. Unless you're CIA or part of NASA, I don't know why you'd be so angry.
That would be the best way to DiE BroOoO I agREe.- dude thats someones opinion if they think its fake then thats what they think idiot we are not in our medievel religion stupidity times anymore. Just because someone has a different brain than yours doesnt mean we should kill them. Your comment is a dissapointment
Fun fact Don Pettit the NASA astronaut said - we used to have the technology to go to the moon but we destroyed that technology and it's a painful process to build it back again
Hey guys! Wow, I never could have imagined any one of my videos reaching this level of popularity! Not only that, but having a healthy dialogue about issues is a great thing, and I appreciate it. For some folks, the "flag waving" issue has sparked interests in the so-called Apollo Moon landing hoax. There are a few articles that detail some interesting points, but with an understanding of physics in zero-gravity with no friction or wind we can actually understand perfectly why the flag waves. I found an interesting article to read and hope to hear your thoughts: www.quora.com/Since-there-is-no-wind-or-atmosphere-on-the-Moon-how-can-the-US-flag-be-flapping-in-pictures-of-the-first-Moon-landing
Let me know if you have any questions, I'm here to talk!
Curivity I'm impressed that you've remained active on the same account for so long! I don't believe the moon landing was fake but I am wondering why no stars are visible. I'm sorry a majority of the comments are in complete denial of one of the most amazing scientific achievements of mankind. Great video!
Professional Dimwit....perfect name for an idiot that believes this crap.
Professional Dimwhit I was always a believer. But look at the noted times ( 4:05, 4:11-4:18+4:07 5:03-5:12) that prove otherwise 😞I recently visited a university well known for its space/science program and who houses one of the top telescopes, which had a supposed "original" print of the astronauts. I didn't understand why people didn't believe we went to the Moon....until I noticed the cables in that picture even. For once ever, my brain almost exploded. I back burnered it though until recently when I had time to really research NASAs footage and all of the media from back then, and even here in this one.
Look at the cables and mirrors clearly in this footage 😞 I always was a believer til I saw this and all of the rest of the "authentic" footage. If you keep your eye on the top of their backbags- you can see the cables that created the anti gravity Effect..in almost every shot no less. Look at the astronaut (A) on the left 4:05, 4:11-4:18+ (not to mention the flag waving on its own in real time-which wouldn't be possible)---then 4:07 Astronaut (B). Closeup at 5:03-5:12. Then the mirror anomalies show up throughout all of their "work", but mostly seeing the wires, and the "tenting" effect caused by the cables being pulled Upward are unmistakable to miss😢 Also, I always had wondered as a kid with them noticing around like that, how come they never sounded the least bit exerted? They're hacking away at the surface and jumping around and yet it's like their commentary was done while lying down. Oh geez, talk about the "jumping and falling"..on the original footage where one of them falls, the cable is pulled too tightly and quickly and you'll watch him being flown upwards without footing! His foot literally flies in front of him. And then you can see Both of their wires and that tenting effect closeup again. Be prepared to wonder why we didn't notice that before since it is so obvious now, other than Trust.
Then there's a shot with a bag attached to the ship and while one walks by it, in slo-mo obviously, the bag swings at regular speed until they notice it and quickly remove it all together and place it on top.; literally he unclipped it from its safe hanging place for easy access, to the top, to avoid it swinging again. The Mirroring material is constantly happening in every piece of footage there is too.
So sad.
But...I also understand how important it was for Us to be the first to reach the moon, in a time of super powers competing for the top position and Russia was just too damn close (apparently), so we had to do "something".
Either/or, it's still brilliance. A mass deception? yes. But one desperately needed at a time when it was perhaps of monumental importance to remain "#1".
The major problem is if they have lied to us about one of our most important accomplishments...seriously, this is on one of the largest proportionate scales..what else to they lie to us about? I know for me it made me RE- search the more important "scientifically proven" claims now.
My eyes and mind have been forcibly opened. I only hope that all of us do this since we are told to always seek the truth..as the truth will be what sets us free.
Make up your own mind when viewing all of the footage.
Curivity I was always a believer. But look at the noted times ( 4:05, 4:11-4:18+4:07 5:03-5:12) that prove otherwise 😞I recently visited a university well known for its space/science program and who houses one of the top telescopes, which had a supposed "original" print of the astronauts. I didn't understand why people didn't believe we went to the Moon....until I noticed the cables in that picture even. For once ever, my brain almost exploded. I back burnered it though until recently when I had time to really research NASAs footage and all of the media from back then, and even here in this one.
Look at the cables and mirrors clearly in this footage 😞 I always was a believer til I saw this and all of the rest of the "authentic" footage. If you keep your eye on the top of their backbags- you can see the cables that created the anti gravity Effect..in almost every shot no less. Look at the astronaut (A) on the left 4:05, 4:11-4:18+ (not to mention the flag waving QUICKLY is the problem in real time-which wouldn't be possible- a "wave" yes. But it wouldn't be able to snap so quickly/sharply-they fail to mention the speed at which it moves in all of the physics explanations, rather staying focused on its just moving on its own)---then 4:07 Astronaut (B). Closeup at 5:03-5:12. Then the mirror anomalies show up throughout all of their "work", but mostly seeing the wires, and the "tenting" effect caused by the cables being pulled Upward are unmistakable to miss😢 Also, I always had wondered as a kid with them noticing around like that, how come they never sounded the least bit exerted? They're hacking away at the surface and jumping around and yet it's like their commentary was done while lying down. Oh geez, talk about the "jumping and falling"..on the original footage where one of them falls, the cable is pulled too tightly and quickly and you'll watch him being flown upwards without footing! His foot literally flies in front of him. And then you can see Both of their wires and that tenting effect closeup again. Be prepared to wonder why we didn't notice that before since it is so obvious now, other than Trust.
Then there's a shot with a bag attached to the ship and while one walks by it, in slo-mo obviously, the bag swings at regular speed until they notice it and quickly remove it all together and place it on top.; literally he unclipped it from its safe hanging place for easy access, to the top, to avoid it swinging again. The Mirroring material is constantly happening in every piece of footage there is too.
So sad.
But...I also understand how important it was for Us to be the first to reach the moon, in a time of super powers competing for the top position and Russia was just too damn close (apparently), so we had to do "something".
Either/or, it's still brilliance. A mass deception? yes. But one desperately needed at a time when it was perhaps of monumental importance to remain "#1".
The major problem is if they have lied to us about one of our most important accomplishments...seriously, this is on one of the largest proportionate scales..what else to they lie to us about? I know for me it made me RE- search the more important "scientifically proven" claims now.
My eyes and mind have been forcibly opened. I only hope that all of us do this since we are told to always seek the truth..as the truth will be what sets us free.
Make up your own mind when viewing all of the footage.
fucking yankees.no moon.NO
Fact: this wasn't recommended to you, you searched for it
OK, you got me
Yep
Actually it was recommended to me
Wow
Yes hahaha
I wonder if Armstrong told his wife after the landing, "I love you to the moon and back."
Comedy
🤣🤣🤣
What if he was single
@@BigImagejpeg he wasn´t
I wonder if Armstrong told his wife after the “landing”: ‘Honey, I never landed on the moon.’ Because the lunar landing is a great hoax, you understand.
I once met Buzz Aldrin. He said "I am Buzz Aldrin, second man to walk on the moon. Neil before me."
Imagine this happens again in our lifetime and we get to watch everything on HD livestream
2024 boy
Did you mean the first time
@@yamilmolina7846 read a book man or try not to have kids, dense cabbage.
live from Hollywood.
Gonna happen soon
Neil's mother be normally gave birth to him not knowing that the baby inside of her will be the first man to step on the moon. How spectacular!
Hi Swiftie
He wasn't they never went to the moon its all fake
@@cwilson1768 ?
@@cwilson1768 you crazy?
@@cwilson1768 i need 10 prove?
fun fact
when neil armstrong was thinking of what his first words would be on the moon surface during the Apollo 11 landing, command module pilot Michael collins jokingly suggested:
"if you had any balls, you'd say "oh my god, what is that thing!" then scream and cut your mic."
LMAO IMAGINE
The conspiracy theories that would have come from that would still be going today
ua-cam.com/video/Iu5aaWWLwzo/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/XMMvSzvZIGM/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/wg0pRD73IYM/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/SWO3HB4RcsU/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/bPPKKEXMcNI/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/OWGTXSlXGnc/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/T8-YdgU-CF4/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/ueMCLDAmsYI/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/WogsSOrr0l8/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/k0xClWgidZU/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/aQ7_9eIAlT4/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/WAeBPskvP4Y/v-deo.html
He should've
I want NASA to livestream astronauts going to the moon and one of them will say "oh my god what is that!-" and cut the mic 10 seconds before the livestream ends.
the guy jumping up and down!!! just incredible. i couldnt imagine the level of happiness they felt
if you get dragged by ropes through movie studio lol...
It’s movie.
ua-cam.com/video/zFAwRbKLYEo/v-deo.html
I could imagine how the elves felt when Rudolph caught a flat tire and Santa sleigh ran outta gas
@@Denchis2 Not proven. there was an american flag on the moon. be serious
Who else is watching this during lockdown/quarantine?
Paolo Angelino Guerrero me
Meee
Me
It’s called quarantine, but whatever. Anyway I am
Hi
Imagine how cool it would be with 1080p.
Edit: Looked away for 11 months to 735 likes, thanks.
1440p
Watch the documentary movie Apollo 11 (2019)
saint augustine 気ュ桜 lol it’s not the same thing weirdo.
@@dracosuniverse558 is it?
Still now ,no one was able to touch moon
They All jus fake it
Imagine being the first person in history to walk on the moon. Now that is a flex
It is fake because on the moon there is no wind
Psycho bruh what
@@iiraingirlii yes. This whole thing was staged by NASA
Psycho They know there’s no wind they Installed a mechanism to keep the flag straight but there was a mistake so it ended up having that permanent ripple as it was in very low gravity
Its been 40 years. Not a single moon maned mission since then. Why? Answer me.
Wow that's wonderful.I love it.I love you astronauts.
@cristinaclave
ua-cam.com/video/zFAwRbKLYEo/v-deo.html
💝👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
That's spelled "astroNOTS'.
Imagine going to the moon and then recording it on snapchat
💀
Yo bro’s I’m out here on the moon with the bois nothing big!
Ur soo random 💀😂
😲
Tik tok
I look at the moon at night and be amazed that somebody actually went there... it gives me chills.
kuku swuro same here
grow up
kuku swuro I look at the McDonald’s from across the street and am amazed how people eat there
awesome name...one way ticket yeaah
Vito thanks
So the Forgotten Astronaut passes away
He lived a good life
With a Great Experience
RIP
@bekzodbob I think he is talking about the one astronaut that was left behind in the CSM, orbiting the moon while the other two landed on the moon in the LM
I want to know who the team that filmed this was. Imagine recording the Apollo leaving the moon back to Earth without you being inside so you could capture the moment. Spectacular, I hope they went back for whoever it was
hollywood movie directors and filming crew lol
@@sosia2721 Have you always been an ignorant fool?
Have you done some internet 'research' to find out how the footage of the Apollo ascent stage was filmed leaving the lunar surface, or are you quite content to just make yourself look like an ignorant fool by claiming that it's fake?
@@sosia2721 I had a hunch lol
The moon landing was shameless fraud.
The guy who shot appolo 11 footage was Stanley Kubrick the top Hollywood director of his time, his 1980 movie "The Shining" was his confession that he helped staged the 1969 moon
I expected a crazy comments section and wasn’t disappointed
Matt Kelly Me neither. Conspiracy nuts am I right 😂
We went to the Moon? OK, on every Apollo landing mission, the crew were out of their suits, for hours on end ( maybe days on end). How can this be. If you say batteries, like Alan Bean, I will laugh at you, I promise. Even 13 had astros out of their suits for seemingly most of the time. & Apollo 13 only had a few amps an hour to use. i know, MAGIC!
& of course for years now, America must use a Russian agency to even get into low Earth orbit.
i was expecting something prideful and respectful, but it's a bunch of idiots with conspiracies
Haruka Sena I used to take things for granted. Why would someone lie? Especially about the moon.
Wake up sweetheart :)
Matt Kelly you don't expect much, do you?
If you feel upset, remember the guys who were'nt selected for the mission watching this footage
I feel so bad for them :(
Yesss????
they went on apollo 12 13 14 15 16 17 so they got to go to the moon as well
That sucks so bad 😑
What happened to them?
Someone watching on September 6th, 2019 after Chandrayan lost connection?
yes bro
Ya
S bro
Yes bro
Yaaa😂😂😂
And to think our cell phones are smarter than the computers back then but somehow, we cant go back..😂
Here are the types of computerisation that was used back then.
*The Launch Vehicle Digital Computer* (LVDC) was a computer that provided the autopilot for the Saturn V rocket from launch to Earth orbit insertion. Designed and manufactured by IBM's Electronics Systems Center in Owego, New York, it was one of the major components of the Instrument Unit, fitted to the S-IVB stage of the Saturn V and Saturn IB rockets. The LVDC also supported pre- and post-launch checkout of the Saturn hardware. It was used in conjunction with the Launch Vehicle Data Adaptor (LVDA) which performed signal conditioning from the sensor inputs to the computer from the launch vehicle.
*The Apollo Guidance Computer* (AGC) was a digital computer produced for the Apollo program that was installed on board each Apollo command module (CM) and Apollo Lunar Module (LM). The AGC provided computation and electronic interfaces for guidance, navigation, and control of the spacecraft. The AGC was the first computer based on silicon integrated circuits. Unlike the more delicate circuit systems of the modern computerised Guidance System of Artemis 1 ect, the Apollo on board Computers were 'old school' and quite robust against the radiation from outside the Apollo Command Module ect. The computer's performance was comparable to the first generation of home computers from the late 1970s, such as the Apple II, TRS-80, and Commodore PET.
Learn about things in an honest way. Get educated. Try to do better.
The Apollo computers were simple sequence machines. The heavy computing was done on Earth at Houston and MIT then uploaded to the spacecraft computer with the latest figures. NASA had been doing this during the Gemini program as well.
It costs money doofus and we’re going back anyway
We are going back! Manned test flights to orbit the moon are scheduled for September 2025 and then a crewed landing the next year approximately.
We can go back and are going back. It just costs a LOT of money. Google the Artemis missions. Artemis 1 has already been back to the moon and back in Nov. 2022 unmanned. # 2 will be with people and #3 will again land on the moon. (Facts)
The skys the limit
Neil Armstrong: Hold my space suit
Hold my Astronaut beer.
The sky’s not the limit.
Daniel Corlett the roof is the limit
@@danielcorlett6164 r/wooooooosh
How can Neil Armstrong breath in space without his space suit
I cannot imagine their happiness. I would be like a child there.
@Liko School So is your school similar to PragerU? A school that tells the exact opposite of what’s true?
@@grassdog46 ikr these people suck lol
ua-cam.com/video/Iu5aaWWLwzo/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/XMMvSzvZIGM/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/wg0pRD73IYM/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/SWO3HB4RcsU/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/bPPKKEXMcNI/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/OWGTXSlXGnc/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/T8-YdgU-CF4/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/ueMCLDAmsYI/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/WogsSOrr0l8/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/k0xClWgidZU/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/aQ7_9eIAlT4/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/WAeBPskvP4Y/v-deo.html
@@Europa-Last-Battle_on_Bitchute Dude you’re obviously being manipulated, do you really think they would release footage that had a rat on it for goodness sake?
ua-cam.com/video/u7_PQCnKrnk/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/Iu5aaWWLwzo/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/XMMvSzvZIGM/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/SWO3HB4RcsU/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/wg0pRD73IYM/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/ueMCLDAmsYI/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/bPPKKEXMcNI/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/yDD-U1RxHyM/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/T8-YdgU-CF4/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/Z5sfov9QSW0/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/lAinKdzKJoA/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/WogsSOrr0l8/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/7nFwPDZF_Z8/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/WAeBPskvP4Y/v-deo.html
Anyone after CHANDRAYAN 2 launch ...
Me
Yesss
M
Yes
Me
Anyone here in 2024?
👍
Да
Yeah and this is bull 💩
Mr
Yeah bro
Here after SpaceX and NASA launched two astronauts to the ISS with Falcon 9.
Same
Haha same
Yep
Samerr
Not just that SpaceX Crew Dragon
Came here because a meme told me the first man to step foot on the moon was Neil Armstrong's cameraman
Lol exposed
so do i 😂😂😂 ffs
@@googleuser1225 ññ
@@Michelle-kf3kh .
Same 😂😂😂😂
Who is here after chandrayaan 2 lost its connection.
Feeling very sorry for the hardwork and dedication of the scientists
We will connect soon, it's not a lost ✋
@@lazarustheyounger I also hope so .... And I pray to God that everything will work fine very very soon
@@seekhaswarupa6422 let's pray together,
We will soon hit on the moon, Keep calm and support ISRO!
There are rumors that Armstrong was not the first man on the moon, but the cameraman ... Is worth considering ...
Are you talking about the photo of buzz? I know that one gets mixed up
Who is started to watch all space related videos...
Me me me
Chandrayan effect
Me, after chandrayan 2
Hell me
I hope india will achieve so many hightes in space...
Michael Collins rip underrated legend behind the mission
Hello Michael where are you from I'm an Indian where are you from?
@@skhazrathayanayan9280 hello weirdo where are you from?
@@skhazrathayanayan9280 LMAOAOAOAO
Who else want to slap the people who turns comment section into calendar. 😔
Jija ji why are they doing that
@@sunzalea3257 for likes, i guess. No offense for those who does that
They just want some likes man why your so mean and being such an asshole
Yep
They suck
Anyone here in 2025
😝👊
Yup😂
Just watched ‘First Man’ movie starred Ryan Gosling and come here to watch this footage. Today is Jan 15, 2021.
I'm watching the movie right know😅
Same right now lmao
Hi where are you from
Hidaya Mambo?
Yes I'm watching the movie right now
Just wanna save the date that I watched this video footage.🙂(July 30,2020)
Yes where are u from
@@Mr_flewis I am from Philippines.🙃🙃
Its my birthday
Friday 28th august 2020
you'll gonna come back to this video at one day of your life.
A very moving moment! I was 16 in Zurich, and I woke up to see the landing. An extraordinary moment in my life!
ua-cam.com/video/u7_PQCnKrnk/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/Iu5aaWWLwzo/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/XMMvSzvZIGM/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/SWO3HB4RcsU/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/wg0pRD73IYM/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/ueMCLDAmsYI/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/bPPKKEXMcNI/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/yDD-U1RxHyM/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/T8-YdgU-CF4/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/Z5sfov9QSW0/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/lAinKdzKJoA/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/WogsSOrr0l8/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/7nFwPDZF_Z8/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/WAeBPskvP4Y/v-deo.html
Are you 32 now?
@@piratebay1487 he’s 68
You must be old man. You r lucky when born in non-internet era
Lol I saw Jurassic park in the movie theater but I never thought I’d see them in the woods. Lol Sheep
When you first think of the moon landings, it seems pretty basic. But imagine being the astronauts being able to firsthand experience a place that is quite literally otherworldly.
Every time you think there is hope for this world, just read the comments to this video, all hope is lost.
TheBearWhisperer
I think it fake how is the camera video tape the ship from outside and the landing if the astronauts still on the ship
TheBearWhisperer I agree with you
because the world is currently full of alot more morons than it used to be. it's this new generation. something very wrong with them
Karl 355 yeaaah
Half Blood Prince29699 bro it's real they have ample of technology
Who is still watching this 18th of July 2019😀
tommorow it will be 1 decade
Mel Correche i
Me
Mel Correche me
Me, today
I remember watching the moon landing with my Grandma,Mother, brother and sister we were up north at her cabin watching Neil and Buzz bouncing on the moon. I can't believe it has been 50 years! I also had a meeting with Jim Lovell at the MOA
Aww thats a sweet memory. My Auntie was telling me her first memory the other day. When she was very young, her dad picked her up so she could see the moon and said "there really is a man on the moon now".
Buzz your 🧠
Remember when cell phones came out? Even today, they occasionally cut out. Back then, the president used a landmine to talk to the moon??? I just can't buy that.
Fake
ua-cam.com/video/zFAwRbKLYEo/v-deo.html
"It happened not because of curiosity but for Space Race during Cold wars".
~A wise guy that sits at the last bench.
I can just imagine all the micro organisms carried with them being released in outer space and wondering if they would survive
its fake
Harry Esho I meant for the real moon landing not this one
@@gnlone_dw Prove it
We actually now try to take precautions to make sure no living things are on anything we send into space, because if there is anything living out there then it could react negatively to earth life.
@@gnlone_dw your fake
Who's watching in march 2019?
Me
Netlix conspiracies brought me here 😂
Me
March is my birthday
Anonymous Boi meeeeeeeehhhh
Who is here after lander-vikram's location is found by orbiter 😍😂
Me ji
Me
Me bro
bur it's fake where is proof
Me
this is such angelic footage id love to visit the moon one day!
?
Same! But the moon is not what you think 😭
It’s dangerous and they found something horrible that they won’t tell us
ua-cam.com/video/zFAwRbKLYEo/v-deo.html
1969:We landed on the MOON!!!
2019:We got the first picture of a black hole!!!!
Also 2019:The moon landing was fake!
2045:The picture of the black hole was fake!!!!
FUCK YOU DONT EVER SAY THAT AGAIN WE INDEED WENT TO THE MOON AND ESPECIALLY WE PICTURED THE FIRST BLACK HOLE ASSHOLE
Yup. Fake as a 3 dollar bill.
@@Anti_Electron chill u little son of a bitch
Gabriele F. If it's U S, it's FAKE, have a nice day.
Blue TNT ironic sentence
Everyone is like land on the moon again
Nasa is like sorry we don’t have that technology that we had in 1969
lmao,but we got lucky, Neil was a gifted astronaught, look at his gemini flight how he saved himself by staying calm, if we got an astronaught like that again we would probably go
When did nasa state this?
Ziyaad Fredericks I’m not sure I heard someone say it but they didn’t say when
They have the technology but just not the money
@@lukethorne5329 I'm pretty sure that no one said that
The earth's view from the moon looks just different and magnificent.
@Raul Hinojoza Well its literally a real landing until someone make a hoax. Idk why, internet sometimes give fake information lol
@@юля801 do you believe it or not?
@myusernamesthisdealwithit I don't know if there already is a reply directed to you but I'll still reply, The Flag was held up by a horizontal pole and was waving because the Astronaut was moving it. There also is another answer to that in the pinned comment.
@@tritonics3118 I appreciate you reading your science book. However, this is CGI’ed. keep lying to yourself lad.
@@Yo69696yo Have you taken a look at CGI in the 60s? It's dogshit
Cant believe people can actually believe this happened, time to wake up and smell the coffee 🤣🤣
Which is no different to the people I'm debating right now saying "Cant believe people can actually believe the Earth is a ball..." :-)
Apollo proof:
1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the moon landing missions.
2. There are thousands of hours of video too.
3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the moon.
4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth.
5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions.
6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base.
7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base.
8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits.
9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the moon.
10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco
11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that.
12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing.
13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud.
14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports).
15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government.
16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm
17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks.
18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon.
19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the moon.
20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile.
21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic).
22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit.
23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal
On that time
Neil Armstrong be like -
Chand pe hai Apun
😂😂
India chand per nahi ja paya 😭
@@hariskhan6494 it's not a failure..... We tried many nation don't think also to go to the southern part of moon in this budget...... We achieved we achieved respect.......we should not cry like this just have a smile on your face.....atleast we tried 😊
@Merz I agree with you!!
@@hariskhan6494 irso is working on that mission
imagine nasa doing years of preparation and experiments to send someone to the moon just for people to say its fake smh
For real though all that work and all the people just for some people to say it’s fake cause a flag is moving. We need help
Because it was
It's fake
The flag moves because it's being driven down as it's planted and on top of that the shuttle kinda has huge engines you morons
@@J0j0333 dude its fake stop trying to prove it isnt
Imagine going to moon for the first time in your life how scary and awsome would it be
And to be the first one over there
No one will ever know
Instead they were as excited as landing in Cleveland
This was a monumental achievement! ❤
😂 🤦omg
@@rororobertsonSHUT UP!!! ⚡️
11 years ago 11 million view thats interesting
At this moment, you got 11 likes lol
@@snwwwy 😭😭😂😅
Make a wish.
yea
and it’s Apollo 11
I can't believe that...
Those people risked their lives to land on the moon and now some 9 years old kids genius say it is fake.
I wanna launch a rocket full of this geniuses straight to the sun
fake
@@Taleko11 do you have any prove that is fake?
@@cakie6441
Why has no one else landed on the moon?
@@moalli832 It's expensive, and it's been done.
@@moalli832 drones and robots were launched not just got the moon. They were launched to mars Pluto and other planets of the solar system
I expected alot more views than just 13 million cause this is revolutionary. One of the first steps to space travel.
A waste of money too
You are just much too much
@@happylucky7354 a waste for a fake vid
@@happylucky7354not a waste at all, a huge step for mankind.
I watched this on TV as a kid and it Started my lifetime interest in Science.
Half of a trillion dollars goes to feeding the illegals, not to science or bettering ourselves. To the third world scum who steal from us, what our forefathers gifted to us. More money, on top of the $500 billion goes to negroes and white trash for them to live drugged up and work free. Moon landings won’t ever happen again, so just stay nostalgic
Human are smart, we will get back to normal one day. This Covid ain’t stopping us from our dream.
@Richard Gomez u dumb
Ny Yankees0802 ,yes.😌🤧
@Richard Gomez Humanity isn't dumb, some of us just gets off track and we might keep going.
Indeed! If we survived the Black Plague and probably also the Ice age? WW1, WW2, Cuban crisis and etc. then I don't see the reason why we can't survive this Covid..
@Richard Gomez yes,humans can be dumb sometimes but that is what makes us humans. We become dumb sometimes and make mistakes and learn from it. Its part of life
21-11-2020, this is the date when I watched this memorable video
12 - 1 - 21
Hmm
Ok? Who asked
@@eminoryay8591 bruh, nobody asked you either
@@Laibaarts asked me what exactly?
Americans then:Land on the moon
Americans now:I can't breathe with a mask😭😭
@@blurzie8618 it wasn't fluttering.
It was made like that
Um
WE ARE U.S. CITIZENS. CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES. THE UNITED STATES IS A COUNTRY BUT AMERICA ITS NOT A COUNTRY AMERICA ITS A CONTINENT. THE WHOLE ENTIRE CONTINENT WAS NAME AMERICA 269 YEARS WAY BEFORE THE UNITED STATES BECAME A NATION.
@@blurzie8618 EXACTLY. I THINK THE U.S. GOVERNMENT IS LYING. BECAUSE THE IMAGES DON'T SHOW NO STARS. ITS ALL DARK. NOW THE U.S. FLAG MOVES. I THOUGHT THERE'S NO WIND UP THERE.
@@blurzie8618 EXACTLY
It's amazing how this was the result of a competition between two global superpower countries but despite it, both sides could agree going to space and exploring it is an achievement for both sides. Im glad this was recommended to me, I always adore the outer space.
هل صدقت هذا يا صديقي
هل يوجد في سطح القمر رياح... انظر كيف يرفرف العلم الأمريكي... إنهم كاذبون. 😂
Trained Russian KGB agents could not figure out the moon landing was faked. Oh no, but these geniuses in the comment section obviously could.
My favorite comment
Dragunov Ras Rebel same here
Brood what you should've said was look I've been fooled like many others and I need to search for truth because I'm tired of being lied to.
Brood there’s no wind on the moon, it had no atmosphere
Wires. Camera manipulation. Hollywood. Its genius.
There are so many comments on Apollo-11 moon landing regarding its authenticity. I myself was in the U.S in 1969 as a Ph.D. Student in Aerospace Engineering at a top ranking U.S. University. We all closely followed the Moon landing mission with keen interest, particularly so
being an Aerospace Engineer. T.V. Live coverage in the national channel ABC was non-stop continuously for the last four days , Michael Collins in the Command Module, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin in the lunar module. Then the historical landing on the moon. It should be mentioned that lift off from the moon surface was not a big issue as it had a powerful rocket thruster and gravity is 1/6 of earth, so it could be properly designed. Looking at the entire mission, it never appeared to us that the entire show is fake. Later we visited NASA Houston and shaw the original Command module which returned back to earth.
It is unfortunate that people make the comments without knowing anything. Later moon landing mission was not tried as it was then thought of unmanned flight which might be more useful. Apollo-14 commander John Young was our friend in the University. The subsequent mission continued till Apollo-17, though NASA had two more Saturn-5 boosters.
Above comments are just for those who need to understand much more about Aeronautics. Well this subject is not a child’s play item and making useless remarks.
Ar
Feel pity on such cowdunks
@@fredygeorge8991 cow dungs
So you agreed the 'entire' moon landing was not fake! But some of them are...
The story is fake and full of cow dungs...
Thanks Mr. Prasun for your valuable and most authentic inputs. And at the same time whatever evidence of Truth you produce, you cannot correct some most hardened and learned fools.
"One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind." What an experience that would have been, i would give up anything to experience this event.
It’s incredible we used to think any of this was real.
You used to be right.
Woah, okay then you MUST have evidence or reasons why its fake.
@@articticcbluthe flag is literally blowing ..
@@Arielimani-qe6bxthey had a cord on it the other astronaut is pulling it off camera
Can we stop dumping more money into education and welfare programs if scores of you numbskulls are still pouring out?
Bruh space is always so fascinating whenever i see footage of it
fake------comment
real-----like
what do you think?
fake cuz the flag was moving like it was windy
Solar wind wouldn't really affect the flag as it isn't very refective. The flag continues to move because of the momentum it gained from being shaken as it was put in the ground.
Khadiza Kamal someone needs to no some science about the moon dumb fuck
Fake!
@@hibernii i also think so
There's just something awesome listening to music from the 1600's while watching a space mission from the 1970's in 2019. Really goes to show how some of mankind's greatest achievements truly are timeless.
Wdym it’s it’s 2022
@@Valeria-hn9wo its a old comment from 3 years ago
2023 ✌️
لماذا يرفرف العلم الأمريكي... هل يوجد رياح فوق سطح القمر.... أجيبوني يا ساده
I wanna go to space when I grow up
2020 anyone?
I am from 3029
@@swatitripathi9663 i think you're from 2019/24/december 😊
@@arkanmukhlis8696 wrong 33/45/45
@@idgafcuh7912 that doesn't make any sense
SHUT THE HELL UP
Just imagine how impossibly true it is that everyone still believes that humans have been on moon but never again.
Look up the SLS rocket.
Well, we havent. It was a Stanley Kubrick production (at least the human missions).
@@Subzero12376 - Nope, since it is impossible to fake the Apollo footage, unless the film studio is on the moon of course :-)
People in the 60s: saw the moon landing made up a bunch of scientists and smart people. And believed it.
People afterwards: saw a thing on the Internet about flags in space. And denied everything nasa worked on for decades
for all of you who are debating about the flag "wavering" who clearly haven't read the pinned comment don't you think that if they were making a proper movie they could have just taken 5 minutes to reshoot the scene why would they leave it in if its waving? the only evidence you have is just pointing at easily fixable things and saying "flag wave so that must mean air" when it is literally explained in the pinned comment and if it does mean its "fake" why didn't the soviet union point it out this literally would be a free shot at America that would ruin the governments reputation
Humans can be the most fascinating and brilliant species on earth by looking at this video but can also be the most ignorant and stupid by looking at these comments.
Edgar Siller no you know what is arrogant, you not keeping an open mind and calling people who don’t believe in your point of view arrogant. There is multiple reasons why it could be fake and multiple reasons why it could be real. governments from other civilisations in the past have spread huge lies, do you know that radiation belts would of destroyed those cameras
@@ballsackmgee3387 multiple other countries have just up an verified we made it. australia for instance verified our launch, and Russia never disputed the fact we made it. How would we have gotten them to lie? threaten to nuke them if they unless they patted us on the back?
@@ballsackmgee3387 The radiation belt isn't equally strong all around the earth, they simply picked the area with the weakest radiation, which is weak enough to go through without major damage.
Beainsack, please do not mate. Earth does not need your offspring.
Comments also shows, you cant fool everyone..
Legends watching this master piece after 12 years
After 53 years
Yeah it was a good movie
They're having fun on the moon lmao
who wouldn't? it was pretty awesome hahah
cold war propaganda intensifies
@@bazi1707 but there's a breath on the moon
@@nnadercoidem8138 :)
Its is not moon guy's they cheated with CGI
How does the flag shake there's is no Air on moon
We can learn that nothing is impossible you can accomplish anything you wish🤞
What brave guys. For those in denial, they left a laser defector on the moon in 1969, an observatory in Texas still sends and measures a return beam 240 times a year since then.
I bet that defector wasn't too happy when they left him on the moon... that's pretty mean.
The word you're looking for is REflector. They left a laser reflector on the Moon.
Paul Metcalf Unless you can disprove this convincingly ... Shut the fuck up
Paul, why would we want to spend more money on new Robotic technology when we can just send people there anyways, making both strides in Space Travel and Hitting the Moon?
No. Robots need to be invented, correct? It is only 1960. They don't nearly have the same amount of complexity as they have today, especially in those motions of the video.
Because we aren't going to the Moon. We need to make sure Mars is stable to enter and live in.
"One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind."
- Neil Armstrong
I would love to know who wrote that
One small step for a man is what should be quoted
Just imagine what it was like to see that in person...truly remarkable
If only someone actually seen it in person
@@crispycream6385 🤡
ua-cam.com/video/wG8XmkWOQl0/v-deo.html An explanation of 2 Galaxies collission
@chadgroyper9526 🤡
@chadgroyper1776 "what makes you believe it’s real?" Science!
Scientific PROOF of the Moon Landings.
1) The most compelling evidence is the analysis of the lunar rock specimens, undertaken around the world. They returned almost 400 kilograms of moon rocks, (and 6 foot core samples) over 1000 times as much as the Soviets were able to retrieve via robotic missions. Both sets of rocks match. Nasa gave more than 15,000 samples of moon rocks to more than 100 countries following lunar missions in 1969 and the 1970, these samples studied around the world not just at NASA or even US research organizations, are definitely and distinctive composition than any terrestrial rock. Every scientist who has studied these rocks has accepted that they are of non-terrestrial origin and there is no peer-reviewed article that contradicts the claim they are from the moon.
Where did the Moon rocks come from if not from the Moon?
2) The massive amount of data the lunar landings returned. These were scientific missions you realize. How could NASA fake all this data w/o actually being on the moon? This data has been studied for over 40 years and much has been verified since by other countries/crafts.
Where did this massive amount of scientific data come from if they never went to the Moon?
3) In addition to the direct personal testimony of eighteen men who went to the Moon from Apollo 11 on, there are mountains of detailed engineering and program management documentations, technical analyses, and still and video footage, hundreds of tons of flight hardware, signals from retro reflectors and experiment packages placed on the Moon by hand, and of course the tracking of signals around and on the Moon by amateurs as well as allies and rivals of the U.S.
4) The Ultraviolet photos taken from the moon’s surface. Until the lunar landings NO ONE knew what the universe looked like in UV light. The Earth gives off to much UV to allow photos on Earth or in Earth orbit. The joint Belgian/British/Dutch satellite TD-1 later scanned the sky for stars that are bright in UV light. The TD-1 data obtained is a match for the Apollo 16 photographs. Further since they also photographed the Earth in UV it is a simple matter to correlate when and where the UV photos were taken, exactly when NASA says they were taken and on the moon.
5) Tracking stations around the world, hired by Nasa (and others on their own) to send and receive the transmission signals between Houston and Moon (as Earth turned different ones would pick up duties) knew their antenna was pointed at the moon, and knew the expected delay in the signal. If there was no astronaut on moon (or at least in lunar orbit) the signal would have been twice the delay. Math doesn't lie, and this proves at least someone was in lunar orbit.
6) The significant numbers of non-NASA employees, including facilities such as the Deep Space Network, which employed (and still employs) many local citizens in Spain and Australia, and facilities such as the Parkes Observatory, which were hired by NASA for specific tasks, but staffed by non-NASA personnel.
7) Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiment Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups.
8) The detection on Earth of reflections from laser ranging retro-reflectors (LRRRs, or mirrors used as targets for Earth-based tracking lasers) on Lunar Laser Ranging experiments left on the Moon.
9) In 2008, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) SELENE lunar probe obtained several photographs showing evidence of Moon landings. The 3D images were a match of Apollo photographs.
10) The Terrain Mapping Camera of India's Chandrayaan-1 probe recorded evidence of lighter, disturbed soil around the Apollo 15 site.
11) NASA had no idea of the exact landscapes when they took the Apollo photos in 1969... and then JAXA (Japan Space Agency) mapped the entire lunar topography. EACH and EVERY photo of the thousands taken on the Apollo missions matched perfectly with what Japan had just discovered. Irrefutable proofs of a manned moon landing. There is simply no way one could have known without actually being on the moon.
12) The Soviet Union monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, which was "fully equipped with the latest intelligence-gathering and surveillance equipment." Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered," describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing.
The missions were tracked by radar from several countries on the way to the Moon and back.
13) Aside from NASA, a number of entities and individuals observed, through various means, the Apollo missions as they took place. NASA released information to the public explaining where third party observers could expect to see the various craft at specific times according to scheduled launch times and planned trajectories.
14) At the height of the Cold War, winning the space race represented a massive feather in the ideological cap of the anti-Communists. As such, if there had been any way to discredit the United States, you can be sure the Soviet Union would have found it. The political damage they could have wrought would have been enormous had they been able to discredit the moon landings. Given that the Soviets were still suffering from the embarrassing climb-down of the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, any opportunity that would have allowed them to embarrass the United States would surely have been grasped with both hands. The fact that in the 40 years since that momentous occasion in human history, not one person from the Soviet camp has produced evidence to dispute the veracity of the moon landings, is as telling as any other evidence you care to name. It has been suggested that the Soviets were in on the hoax; this is too ludicrous for words, especially in an era when tensions between the two countries were so high. It is suggesting complicity in something which would be immensely damaging to their own regime, and that's simply absurd. Forget the arguments; the deafening silence from the Soviet camp is as incontrovertible as any other evidence.
15) It seems obvious to the point of absurdity, but the sheer number of photographs -- none of which show anything terrestrial -- is pretty compelling evidence. The sheer number of photographs which were taken, and the absence of anything more than weak circumstantial evidence, is a strong argument.
16) The the sheer scale of the project would have made it impossible to keep everybody quiet. Over the course of the Apollo project, he estimates that over 400,000 people, or the equivalent of a small city, were involved in working on the project. The odds of every single one of them choosing to keep silent for over forty years, and not producing any evidence, or a memoir, or an overheard conversation suggesting the landings were faked.
17) Why would the U.S fake it SIX times, if we faked it?" It is a pertinent question and it does seem that if you are going to tell a lie, it is far easier to do it once and then stop, than to keep exaggerating the lie over the course of the next few years. Sooner or later somebody would have made a mistake to give the game away. The fact that nobody did, again, illustrates the fact that indeed, these astronauts did make it to the moon.
18) Using photographs, video, NASA documents, and maps of the Moon, a team from Nvidia rebuilt the entire lunar landing using the Unreal Engine. After that painstaking work was finished, they used the new GTX 980, sporting Maxwell GPU architecture to address some of the beef that non-believers have with the landing. Namely, the lighting issues. Every lighting issue was put to rest as Nvidia found NO lighting anomalies. And that proves-YET AGAIN-that we definitely certainly and absolutely put men on the Moon.
19) The fact that NO radiation study ever published has stated radiation would make the Apollo landings impossible and IN FACT most state that a short Apollo style trip to the moon, radiation would not be an operational hazard.
20) The trajectory of lunar regolith thrown up by the Moon buggy and astronauts fell back to the ground as one would expect in a vacuum, ANYWHERE on Earth the dust would of billowed.
21) The trajectory of articles thrown in the videos has been mathematically proven to fall at a rate consistent with 1/6th Earth gravity.
ANSWER ANY OF THOSE!
In our age, science is progressing, the size of space and the world is astonishing, this has shown us that the creator of the world is also a great work of art.❤
Wish I could’ve seen this live, it must’ve been so beautiful. If we make it to the moon again, with today’s technology the footage should be even more incredible.
It's a hoax. If they could have gone to the moon in 1969, don't you think they would have been there many many more times in the past 5 decades?
@@johntheunique so why the hoax?
@@johntheunique going to the moon with a gameboy is more feasible that setting up a cgi.
@@tinalove7860 We needed to prove to the Russians that we had more a advanced space force than them so the Russians would leave us alone.
@@johntheunique it’s a waste of money. There isn’t much to do on the moon
Who else is watching this after spacex launch?
I'm from Brazil and I'm looking for this kind of videos since space X has gone... 😂
Im from lima peru and mee to xD
Everyone who read this comment.
They are so brave!!!
Thanks you is back
The way they walk is so cute 😻😻
@goat 2k productions why
@goat 2k productions well the walk is not fake ..maybe some voices and song is BgM ...
@goat 2k productions in moon we can't see stars
@@thedog7815 because you already been on the moon ? Lmao
@@Bibi-fy9dm nah , but we have seen moon picture at live. We can't see stars everywhere
4:17 5 year old kid when they get their desired chocolate
Yes, i am here after chandrayaam 2 lost connection, don't ask me again
No bro vikram lander had been founded by orbiter
If I had a time machine I would show this to Issac Newton.
When the moon landing in 1969 has better camera then pewdiepie in 2019
BAHAHA
Omg 😅😂😂😂
Ahahah! True
Hehehe actually they have better technology in 1969 then 2019 🤣🤣🇮🇳
he's moving the flag,,,,,, for the same reason the astronauts bounce because of low gravity and no air resistance, plus almost 0 air pressure, once the flag begins to move there is very little resistance to stop it,,, inertia = an object in motion well remain in motion unless acted on by an outside force.....on the moon the outside force is very minimal ...... so yes you can say it was waving but not because wind, but because of inertia...........hope this clears up that mystery ,, you 6th grade science teacher should have done it,,,,,, cheers 😁
Totally forgot the flag theory go right to NASA it self , why are they spending billions of dollars in research to find ways to pass through the Van Allen radiation belts... after all we already have done it twice right .. 100% fake ..
You misunderstood inertia. Inertia is the resistance of an acceleration or an deacceleration in an object with mass. What you thought was inertia is the first of Newtons laws of motion.
this is the definition ... property of matter by which it continues in its existing state of rest or uniform motion in a straight line, unless that state is changed by an external force. ... and ,,, this is what i said........ an object in motion well remain in motion unless acted on by an outside force... that's real close,,, i did not copy and paste the definition when i said it...........I could of..but it's the same thing
.hope this helps,,,have a great day😊
@@themachinehead4421
2990rick Yeah, and thats the definition of Newtons first law of motion. Not inertia. As I said, inertia is the resistance for change in motion due to mass. This is a part of Newtons second law.
Example: 1 Newton of force is needed to push an object with a mass of 1kg to 1 m/s squared. If the object has a mass of two kilograms, twice the force is needed to push it to the same speed. If the object’s mass is 0.5 kg, 0.5 N are needed to push it to a velocity of 1 m/s squared. Hope you understand. The higher mass the object has, more force is needed to accelerate and the more inertia the object has.
Finally someone says it I’ve been trying to explain to these dumb 6 yr olds that
Neil Armstrong = Neil A. spelled backward is Alien >:^)
Wow your spotted
Coincedince I think not
and if u look closer the letters L i a and r are in his name too and what does it spell out ..
L
I
A
R
NintendopePokemonFreak Ruben if you look closely at some of the letters in your name you get:
Nintendope
Pokemon
Freak
Which pretty much sums it up I’d say.
Gnorts, Mr. Alien
This deserves an Oscar brah
I literally watching all videos about planets and people on space haha
( nov 13 2020)
Yeah space is very fascinating
05/03/2021
Watching this on March 08, 2021
watching on March 15 2021 stay blessed peeps 🙏
I also👐
Being on the Moon must really feel wonderful for them, they stepped on land that has been untouched for over a few billion years and they are the first to touch this uncharted land outside the Earth. To feel so weird being so far away from Earth, so far away from home.
A few billion years ago the earth was not a thing. Or the moon
@@dudedoesstuff4131 What do you mean by that? The Earth and The Moon were born exactly 4 billion years ago.
God had not created the earth 4 billion years ago
How do you know of it was.exactly 4 billion years ago. What's your proof
@@dudedoesstuff4131 Like, the scientists who worked hard to uncover Earth's age?
The music sounding like I just got put on hold
I don’t get it
Hahahahaha for 5 mins
Rednaxela Calderon i don’t get the joke,would you explain please?
@@bariohuli145 the background song used was like the sound from the telephone when a call center told you to wait for a while (put on hold) .. so i said hold for 5 mins when u put on hold, it was so long haha
Rednaxela Calderon what is putting on hold? Y
"One small step for Stanley Kubrick, one giant step for American propaganda"
1969: Man walks on moon
2019: Pewdiepie walks on t-series
2169: moon walks on man
Everyone saying it's fake should be launched into the sun.
It's always the people that defend the moon landing that are the angriest. I believe it's completely fake, but I don't wish you any harm. Unless you're CIA or part of NASA, I don't know why you'd be so angry.
Jezza ,the dirt he kicks up falls really fast, like on a planet with gravity! We were never there, total bullshit hoax!
That would be the best way to DiE BroOoO I agREe.- dude thats someones opinion if they think its fake then thats what they think idiot we are not in our medievel religion stupidity times anymore. Just because someone has a different brain than yours doesnt mean we should kill them. Your comment is a dissapointment
@@l-s-pyt3410 check your grammar before you post next time so you won't sound like a complete moron.
@@jameslower8423 done
A lot of people are clearly watching in 2019. Why continuously ask?!? Just about every comment i see. Jeez lol
Exactly 😂😂
Becoz they want likes..in simple words called as UA-cam beggers
Fun fact Don Pettit the NASA astronaut said - we used to have the technology to go to the moon but we destroyed that technology and it's a painful process to build it back again