2016 vs 2009 Air Jordan 11 Space Jam Comparison

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 503

  • @dvanupol11
    @dvanupol11 8 років тому +33

    Honestly both are dope, but personally I would go with the '09s just because I like more of a sleeker look. Whereas the '16s just seem boxier. I'd pay a little more for the '09s for the minimal look on the patent.

  • @chosuke02
    @chosuke02 8 років тому +45

    Ok now the '09s look weird compared to the new Ones

  • @sploit777
    @sploit777 8 років тому +10

    I love the purple tint on the outsole

  • @theloverswineverytime1625
    @theloverswineverytime1625 8 років тому +12

    That peak on the 2016 is WILD lol. Thing almost look like they wing-tips with that thing lol. They still cold though. Still need 'em.

    • @813.tampakicks9
      @813.tampakicks9 8 років тому +2

      Omar najeeb it's supposed to mock the oh pair which had peaks

  • @shadowoftheson5144
    @shadowoftheson5144 8 років тому +77

    The 2016's destroy the 09's. The people complaining don't remember the greatness of the OG's and the patent cut, etc.

    • @NoFilterX
      @NoFilterX 8 років тому +2

      Charles O. same ppl who dnt like da rec tongue on da 3's

    • @poepilla4358
      @poepilla4358 8 років тому +4

      Charles O. I agree

    • @junestone6044
      @junestone6044 8 років тому +1

      Charles O. love the 2016 just wish it jam on the tongue like the OG

    • @black24mamba8
      @black24mamba8 8 років тому +1

      Charles O. They do bro it's just that it looks ugly

    • @FireIceTalon
      @FireIceTalon 8 років тому +1

      So fucking true.

  • @WillEasy
    @WillEasy 8 років тому +13

    I love the 2009 patent leather cuts compared to the 2016, but I like the purple hints on the 2016 more than the blue

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      I respect that. Seems like a lot don't like the high cut patent and peaks. Sorry for the late reply. trying to catch up.

  • @rccharger21
    @rccharger21 8 років тому +22

    I love the higher cut of the patent leather as well! Glad I'm not the only one lol I'd definitely choose the 2016. It just looks like a more substantial shoe and looks like it would last a lot longer. Since I plan on wearing them A LOT, I'm glad they look durable.

    • @EJTITANS1
      @EJTITANS1 8 років тому

      king_ryan_james you should check out my new sneaker review and show some support it will mean a lot thanks!!

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Seems like we think alike! Others I saw are embracing the higher cut patent as well.

  • @djj1
    @djj1 8 років тому +7

    2016s all day! Got some og bred 11s need to check how high cut patent leather is on them...

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Did you get them and do a comparison?

  • @213GONZALEZ1
    @213GONZALEZ1 8 років тому +5

    Years ago I noticed how OG heads would talk about how the retro 11s have a weird shoe shape compared to the OG version. Comparing the two, I concur. The '09 pair has this odd banana shape to it and the low patent leather cut looks funny to me now. Only thing I wish the '16 pair had is the shade of blue the '09 jumpman has. Other than that, I believe the '16 pair is better. No hype, just personal opinion.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +1

      I appreciate your feedback. Yes I love the higher cut patent leather I think it looks good. As for the Blue, I don't dislike it and I see a lot of people love it.

  • @softballdad2412
    @softballdad2412 8 років тому +32

    I like the 2016 more and I also like the higher cut patent leather 🔥🔥🔥👍👍

    • @poepilla4358
      @poepilla4358 8 років тому +5

      Shawn Z
      Me too bro!!!! The 16s are killing the 09s by far.... and you can see that 16s are built to last opposed to the 09s that obviously deteriorate fast 💨 ijs

    • @ThecrazyJH96
      @ThecrazyJH96 8 років тому +2

      the stitching on the sides are ass imo, can see white

    • @JayJay-no7wi
      @JayJay-no7wi 8 років тому +5

      Joseph Harding its supposed to be white

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Dope!

    • @TaybeenTrill248
      @TaybeenTrill248 3 роки тому

      Ehhhh

  • @bobbysmoove4796
    @bobbysmoove4796 8 років тому +2

    It would've also been PERFECT if they combined the elements from both shoes 2009: 23 on the back heel (but stitched instead of printed, and black outlining on the patent leather with no peaks 2016: High patent leather, blue tinted outsole, and Nike air branding on the insole I guess that equals the 2000 space jam 11s lol

  • @Alexred94
    @Alexred94 8 років тому +5

    the 72-10 js look like the 09 space james.just glitter in certain lightings and a red jumpman.i like the 16 more than the 09's

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +3

      To me, the 72-10 was like a mix of the Space Jam and Bred lol.

  • @miguelchavez5521
    @miguelchavez5521 8 років тому +3

    The Higher patented leather cut is so Nice , especially when looking down on the birds eye view. I use to own a pair in 96' in high school and I'm glad they look legit to the true form. All these lil gits that haven't even seen a whole regular season of Jordan playing, got them use to these retros shapes but I like keeping the integrity of the original shape and quality because that leather isn't just higher but it's a Better, thicker quality if you do your research or just have good vision to see that. Blue tint on the sole is so much better than colorless. These are Fresh to Def ,just don't buy them if you don't like them. More for us true OG's that know why these sneakers mean something to us, other than hype beast type mentality out there.

  • @Edward.E.Nigma.
    @Edward.E.Nigma. 8 років тому +7

    Dope review fam. Personally I passed on the 16's. Dope shoe but OG or not , that Patent leather is too high for me. I like the lower cut better and the "23" better but that's me. I will say I like how the "45" is stitched in tho. That part is dope. But either way, dope and classic shoe

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Appreciate it! We all have our own opinions and I respect yours on passing.

    • @TaybeenTrill248
      @TaybeenTrill248 3 роки тому

      100% agree the 09’s are were it’s at

    • @tjgotkicks3466
      @tjgotkicks3466 2 роки тому +1

      Exactly. That high cut patent leather is BS. It's not necessary, don't care if it's OG or not.

  • @moriellymoproblems7842
    @moriellymoproblems7842 4 роки тому +2

    2016s would've been perfect except they should have 23 instead of 45. I know when MJ first came out of retirement he switched to #45 for a bit, but 23 is synonymous with him.

  • @ivangutierrez89
    @ivangutierrez89 8 років тому +3

    i like the new one because of the og molding. If only they did it to the cement 4s that came out in February

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Yea they need to do the OG mold on other releases like the 3s.

  • @o.gstatus5461
    @o.gstatus5461 8 років тому +1

    to me the 2016 pair looks more classic. if you notice in the 90's when Jordan 11's was released with the patented leather was always higher than newer release jordan 11's these days. I really wish I can get my hands on the 2016 space jams. too dope

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Very good point and you are right. Were you able to get a pair?

  • @ILLAILLS
    @ILLAILLS 8 років тому +1

    So glad they made this OG version

  • @kirkbell1926
    @kirkbell1926 7 років тому +2

    I got the 2009 edition they still looking good and I bought two more pair they are used but in good condition

  • @tegbwoy91
    @tegbwoy91 8 років тому +1

    Definitely the 2016 pair.love the blue icy bottoms!!!!😍😍😍

  • @yasinrhodes118
    @yasinrhodes118 7 років тому +12

    The 2009 pair is the actual "space jam" pair the 2016 pair is a remake of the 11 he wore back in 96

  • @davejones4124
    @davejones4124 8 років тому +2

    Definitely with u on both are dope & I'm leaning more towards the 2016.They have more meaning in a sense being closer to the OG & the 20th anniversary of the movie plus can't forget to add how ill the box is for the 2016.Something special right there.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Yea I think I have slightly leaned towards the 2016 because of what it truly represents. Either way, I do love them both.

  • @robbie8257
    @robbie8257 8 років тому

    Camping out for these tonight! I don't just want them for the looks, Space Jam was one of my favorite movies when I was young.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Nice! Were you able to get them?

  • @StayConnectedEV
    @StayConnectedEV 8 років тому +6

    Great review.. I am thinking 2016 looks better than 2009..

  • @lamontmcdaniels322
    @lamontmcdaniels322 8 років тому +2

    2016 I love that og cut tha og's shape Michael Jordan wore tha og's that why I love them

    • @NoFilterX
      @NoFilterX 8 років тому +1

      Lamont McDaniels yall aint like da og 3's tho. the og red tongue. lol

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +2

      Exactly and that's why I love the 2016

  • @feverfan0
    @feverfan0 8 років тому

    Nice comparison video. Very detailed. I entered the raffles today. Hopefully I will cop a pair this week. I heard they run tts

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Thank you! Sorry for the late reply but I am happy you were able to get them.

  • @jarelwilkins6535
    @jarelwilkins6535 8 років тому +4

    both are dope legendary shoes

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      True...can't go wrong with both.

  • @jeff_uchiha
    @jeff_uchiha Рік тому

    I own both versions, I prefer the lower patent cut of the 2009, makes the shoe sleeker and less bulky but the quality on the 2016 is better

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  Рік тому

      I respect that. Yea quality is better on the 2016..from what i remember.

  • @voltprime
    @voltprime 8 років тому +1

    09 is still the best imo. back in the day if your shoes have features like high cut on leather, snout toe box, widows peaks and boxy carbon fiber they would call your pair a FAKE. lol..now JB is feeding us with this. for me i'm used to the 09 shape and its features. them 16's just look weird to me. they still look like oversize GS. will just have to pass. will just get the my kids their pair. Great vid man as always.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      That is very true..I remember those days...Those were ways to spot fakes out. They are a bit bulky, I do admit that. I don't mind it, but something I noticed. Appreciate the compliment.

  • @rccharger21
    @rccharger21 8 років тому +2

    Best comparison vid I've seen of these yet! It's safe to say I might be one of the most excited for these shoes to come out lol I've watched almost every vid that has them in it lol

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Man I appreciate that! Were you able to get a pair?

    • @rccharger21
      @rccharger21 8 років тому

      SneakerFiles.com yep! I got two

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +1

      king_ryan_james Dope!!!!! Congrats

  • @VictorGarcia-uz9yz
    @VictorGarcia-uz9yz 8 років тому

    To me is the little details that makes the difference between both shoes. I can't choose between this Two, school is up again!! Thanks for the class. keep up the good work Brian

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Thank you Victor! To be honest, they are both unique in there own ways. I love them both.

  • @fatalfoams
    @fatalfoams 8 років тому +28

    I personally hate the low patent leather, the 23, and the varsity royal. Hopefully I Win the raffle for these beautiful OG's!

    • @chickenwityamz
      @chickenwityamz 8 років тому +1

      you will get em

    • @fatalfoams
      @fatalfoams 8 років тому

      chickenwityamz Hopefully although my footlocker was on the 11th raffle page lol

    • @fr-ik3749
      @fr-ik3749 8 років тому +1

      i like the 23, cause in the movie (space jam) the shoe mj wore actually have 23 on the back. the rest i can agree on :)

    • @waderoby7295
      @waderoby7295 8 років тому

      Fatal Foams did ya? and I didn't get in the raffle but ik going to finish line instead of footlocker you think I'll be able to cop?

    • @fatalfoams
      @fatalfoams 8 років тому +1

      Wade Roby I got a call back from Footlocker so I won them, and it's tough to tell.. I think if you're prepared and early you should be able to get them

  • @LoaforDie
    @LoaforDie 8 років тому

    I say the Jumpman facing the correct way is a big factor. Makes it more "OG" when they do that.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Yea I agree..not sure why they didn't do that on the past few releases.

  • @kayyysb
    @kayyysb 8 років тому +2

    I'm in love with the 2016 pair😍

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Nice! Were you able to get them?

    • @kayyysb
      @kayyysb 8 років тому

      SneakerFiles.com Yeah me and my brother

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Kaysia Bennett Congrats to you both!

  • @Blasian_guy
    @Blasian_guy 8 років тому +3

    Another dope review keep it up 🙏🏿

  • @RigoGarciaChannel
    @RigoGarciaChannel 8 років тому +1

    Hey man, do the 2009 pair fit more tight/snug than the new 2016 pairs? Please let me know thanks!

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      To be honest I can't remember...I will try and find out though

    • @jaycash8611
      @jaycash8611 3 роки тому

      Yea bro I have both pairs and I’m 10.5 in 2016 pair and the 2009 pair they fit a little too tight compared to the ‘16 pair.. I don’t even wear the 09 pair anymore

  • @novemberei1
    @novemberei1 8 років тому +1

    45 on the the back throws me off, if not coz of that i would choose 016 hands down, i dont mind the patent leather i prefer it og look

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      I respect that. Some people don't like the 45. I do get why.

  • @m3sneakerhead465
    @m3sneakerhead465 8 років тому +2

    Copping the '16, but the '09 are still better IMO. I went through a crazy ordeal involving me (a white guy sticking up for racial discrimination from mall security) , having to change outfits, take out my contacts and put on my glasses, so I could hop back in line and not be seen by police (who had been called by the racist mall security guard) Long story of why, but I ended coppin the last pair in my size. So not only are these sentimental, I truly like my '09 pair better in the looks department, too. Like I said, I will get the '16 pair to collect as well!!!!

    • @ssing4345
      @ssing4345 8 років тому

      Blake Williams lol

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      I respect that. Damn you have a full story behind it. I am happy to hear that you stuck up for what's right. You deserved to get a pair that day for sure.

  • @corneliuswilson4408
    @corneliuswilson4408 8 років тому +2

    The 09's can't mess with the 2016 pair the 2016 looks like the og's I remember when I had the 11's in the 90's they just look better

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      have to agree with you. OG is always better IMO

  • @adunn1809
    @adunn1809 8 років тому +2

    Great video as usual appreciate it Bro. Different to see a space jam comparison video. Definitely stood out. I gotta say the 2016 looks a little better because the concord and the higher patent leather. Personally I like the blue sole cuz I know it will last longer without yellowing anyway much respect salute 👊🏽

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +1

      Thank you as always!!!! Yea the 2016 will last longer for sure and won't yellow as fast..were you able to get them?

    • @adunn1809
      @adunn1809 8 років тому +1

      SneakerFiles.com yeah bro I doubled up 😁

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      A Dunn Dope man! Congrats!!!

  • @amberdeatrick1099
    @amberdeatrick1099 8 років тому +2

    had both 09 were alright but the 16 is wayyyyy nicer

  • @narutoshadowclone1
    @narutoshadowclone1 8 років тому +1

    Both have their great features and positives. Don't really see negatives unless referring to the '23' and '45' I guess preference. I managed to get the 2016 pair and would have given up if I had failed cuz when all those unauthorized and grey market pair of space jams with icy soles came out I knew once they yellowed they would be quite difficult to tell apart. Anyway getting off subject great vid.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      I agree, I don't really see any negatives between the two. Both are unique and to me, are different models.

    • @narutoshadowclone1
      @narutoshadowclone1 8 років тому

      SneakerFiles.com would you say at this point that it's pointless for one to try to get the 2009 pair. Some believe that the 2009 pair is now so old and will fall apart. Thoughts? 🤔

  • @mogains
    @mogains 8 років тому

    *For me I love the OG more. But this is one of the 3 in my opinion is a must have for the year. If I had only known that ppl keeps their old Jordan's I would have some OGs to compare myself. We in Trinidad beat the hell out them and throw them away. Dope review bro. I'm getting 2 pairs. And my reason for the OG is that's what I wore back in the day. Save out money for months before and after they release to cop them. My mother and family asking if I'm mad to wear such an expensive shoe. And yea in Trinidad you will get robbed or killed in certain places. This shoe back then was $2500. Now it's $3800. And they don't stay on shelves for long. Just like me some sneakerheads gets the call as a new shipment is about to land. We had this shoe close to a week now. Bro you keep making those dope real reviews. 👍🏽👊🏽🇹🇹*

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Man much respect to you! Always appreciate your insightful comments. Make sure you stay safe out there. Shoes aren't worth getting hurt over.

    • @mogains
      @mogains 8 років тому

      SneakerFiles.com you're most welcome. And most definitely. And please don't forget what I asked if you can do on IG. 👊🏽🇹🇹

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      MO GAINS I got you on that! Don't worry. Appreciate it as always.

  • @jvburns16
    @jvburns16 8 років тому +1

    Great video I'm liking the 2016 better that high patent leather look dope even tho I know a lot of people going to get away with fakes you can't go wrong with close to OG

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Thank you! I am glad you like the look. I have a fake pair on hand, and they are pretty close but will be able to tell the difference.

  • @chickenwityamz
    @chickenwityamz 8 років тому

    Cant complain with JB. Quality has gotten slightly better than the 2011-15 years, and they have been coming through with true to og Jordans. Excited to get this pair this time around but those 09 11s were too clean!

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      I agree when it comes to the 11s. Were you able to get them?

    • @chickenwityamz
      @chickenwityamz 8 років тому

      SneakerFiles.com Yes sir! Thx for the reviews man. sneakerfiles.com

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      chickenwityamz No problem! I am happy to hear you got them.

  • @MrMetalbandit
    @MrMetalbandit 8 років тому

    Didn't even notice how much you blew up until you said it. Congrats on the almost 40k!

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Thank you! It's been almost a year since I have returned...enjoying every day.

  • @buggn413bk
    @buggn413bk 8 років тому

    excellent visualz and comparison I knew it!!!! royal vs concord

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +1

      hahah thank you! Always appreciate it.

  • @ibrahimalic5987
    @ibrahimalic5987 7 років тому

    How come there isnt significant darker yellowing around the outline of the pads on the soles of this 2009 pair? The yellowing shade is quite even on the whole sole but i was told if there isnt darker yellowing around the paids of the outline they’re a fake pair?

  • @charisglaze6843
    @charisglaze6843 5 років тому

    The only 2016 AJ 11 THAT WAS MADE WITH THE ORIGINAL MOLD WAS THE 72-10 AIR JORDAN WITH THE LOWCUT PADNET LEATHER !

  • @mikeruck2888
    @mikeruck2888 6 років тому

    If they took the low cut patent leather and put it on the 2016 pair...the 2016 pair would be PERFECT

  • @AveryFlores22
    @AveryFlores22 8 років тому +1

    I love the space jams I just need help deciding. I like them but I also like the new SF Air Force 1 triple white that come out tomorrow. I have enough for one I just don't know which one to get

    • @JasonLove
      @JasonLove 8 років тому +2

      xboxFREAKINSWEET cop the J's

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Sorry for the late reply, but would go with the 11s. What did you wind up getting?

  • @leonardbenjaminbandril3541
    @leonardbenjaminbandril3541 8 років тому

    I like the higher patent leather cut coz more materials = more value to our money.lol. And that's what retro is all about, being close to the original shoe. I like the 2016 better. I might sell my Ultra boost 3.0 triple white to buy a deadstock of this. Do you think $280 with taxes is justifiable price for this? thanks

  • @CroutonsRawk
    @CroutonsRawk 8 років тому

    Team 2016, I mean, the 09s have been a fan favorite and the pair i grew up liking, but due to the fact that everything is going back to OG, Jordan brand got me, hook line and sinker

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Dope! I still like the 09 but it's something about the 2016....damn....

  • @liltamcao4568
    @liltamcao4568 3 роки тому

    How to get my Jordan space jam 11 a light blue sole again, my is completely milk colorway for some reason

  • @phyzlatte
    @phyzlatte 7 років тому

    I like the higher cut patent leather better. But I like the Royal jumpman more lol

  • @shesunrepeated
    @shesunrepeated 8 років тому

    Really good comparison!

  • @onimusha222000
    @onimusha222000 8 років тому

    I love the 2016 one.... just need to bear the "45". hope I can get one in my home country. nice comparison!

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Thank you! Were you able to get them?

  • @igromodon
    @igromodon 8 років тому +1

    Dope video!!! 👍 Only complaint is the fact you keep copping out by not choosing which one you prefer. My opinion, the 96' PE 11s (cause that's what they were) obliterates those inaccurate 2009 joints in every way.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Appreciate that. It's honestly hard to pick one..I like them both...However if I was forced to pick, it would be the 16.

  • @Carlitosway2369
    @Carlitosway2369 5 років тому

    Great comparison 👍🏼👌🏼🙌🏼👏🏼

  • @anihmal7849
    @anihmal7849 8 років тому

    I entered 11 times for the space jams in a 10.5 do you think I have a good chance of getting a pair. And if I don't get them should I be able to get them online easily?

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Sorry for the late reply, but were you able to get a pair?

    • @anihmal7849
      @anihmal7849 8 років тому

      SneakerFiles.com I got 2 pairs man

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Anihmal Dope! Congrats

  • @christianjimenez6663
    @christianjimenez6663 8 років тому

    these are nice but not perfect (lately with Jordan releases)...LIKE: the concord color way, icy blue, embroidered #, inside sole, and box...DISLIKE: high patent leather, 45 (he had 23 in movie)...with that said were can i find a tune squad jersey?

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      I respect your likes and dislikes. I haven't seen the tune squad jersey available in a minute. You might have to try eBay.

  • @TheDudeAbides1998
    @TheDudeAbides1998 8 років тому

    I just call the 2016 versions, the Black Concords. I wonder how is the sizing and padding on the ankle collar and tongue on them? Do they fit like the recent retro 11s or what?

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Nothing wrong with calling them that. Sorry for the late reply but IMO, they fit like previous 11s.

    • @TheDudeAbides1998
      @TheDudeAbides1998 8 років тому

      SneakerFiles.com
      Going either true or a 1/2 size up won't hurt at all huh?

    • @TheDudeAbides1998
      @TheDudeAbides1998 8 років тому

      SneakerFiles.com
      The Concord and the Varsity Royal, proves they are different. And when he wore them. He wore one in an actual series and wore one in the movie.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      EmperorJBO I probably wouldn't go half size up..from what I heard, some have gone half size down.
      You are right about that, but in the movie it looks like Concord..

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      EmperorJBO I don't think I understand..is that a bad thing? lol sorry it's early for me..haha

  • @abrhaassad5516
    @abrhaassad5516 8 років тому +6

    copped 2 pairs of the 2016 for retail. if I wanted to get a DS 2009 space jam I would have to pay more than what I paid for BOTH 2016 pairs, and after seeing this vid I don't care for the 09 pair anymore. Anyone else not really feeling the 09?

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +1

      2009 I think is cool still, it's something different. However I am 100% satisfied with the 16 release.

    • @CoffeeMadeMeSay
      @CoffeeMadeMeSay 8 років тому

      those peaks though

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Bathtub Shark not a fan?

    • @datboyk3261
      @datboyk3261 8 років тому +1

      Abrha Assad 09 are are whack compared to the 16s

  • @GLo_2kTv
    @GLo_2kTv 5 років тому +1

    The bred 11s coming out are supposed to go back to the original patent leather design! 🔥 This new shit is cut too high and reminds me of the shoes brett Hart use to wear!😂

    • @James-xx4kb
      @James-xx4kb 5 років тому +1

      Nah, OG patent leather AJ XI high cut is the truth!

  • @vovik05
    @vovik05 8 років тому

    Good reviews! Keep it up!

  • @Mr.DAZ92
    @Mr.DAZ92 8 років тому

    personally they both are dope! I'm kinda liking the new 2016 version slightly more tho! no hype, they just look slightly better to me...

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Agree. They are both dope in there own ways...both being unique.

  • @Moye1984
    @Moye1984 8 років тому

    Those laces are Net laces and that paten leather cut is so much nicer on the OG 16s but them peaks is kinda bunk

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      People don't like the peaks..I don't mind them but they could have went without and I wouldn't mind.

    • @fieusdesign5209
      @fieusdesign5209 8 років тому +1

      Moye H easy fix on the peaks just use a nail clipper

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Fieus Design LOL true.

  • @geddowarrior8125
    @geddowarrior8125 8 років тому +1

    i luv tha higher kut of tha patent leathur on tha 2016 jamz, but i $till lyke tha 2009 pair alot bettur.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      I respect that. I like them both for there own reasons

  • @Fizz826
    @Fizz826 8 років тому

    I got the 2016 release from Nike on the day of the release. Once I got them I really dislike the high patent leather. I have the bred 11s, the lower leather when it creases it doesn't look bad. Once the high patent leather creases on the 16 pair it'll look really bad because it'll be long. I'm going to sell them..

    • @P4p775
      @P4p775 7 років тому

      Fizz826 damn still have my pair DS. As long as it's not clearly noticeable I don't care. The problem I have with the 09 release is damn toe box. Lol

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  7 років тому

      I respect that. We all have our own opinions and I have noticed some do hate the higher cut patent.

  • @toney6664
    @toney6664 8 років тому

    O9s are nice but the soles always throw me off I personally love the 16 s with the concord and purple soles. And I never got a chance to own a pair of 00s so it's nice to get a retro for them

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Do the soles throw you off because of the yellowing?

  • @spectacular_god9763
    @spectacular_god9763 8 років тому +2

    I like them both but i dont have any. I need these is all I know lol

  • @demontesawyer9640
    @demontesawyer9640 8 років тому

    I wish you could combine the 2.. I like everything on the 16 from the Nike inside to the higher patten to the blue icy bottom, but I wish it had the varsity blue logos and the varsity blue logo on the bottom vs the white logo on the bottom of the 16.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      I think that would have been dope to be honest.

  • @lathenclyatt2240
    @lathenclyatt2240 8 років тому

    i have both and in my opinion i like 16 better just because the changed the patent leather and the blue tint

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Respect. Glad you have both and decided off of that.

  • @mobleylee8950
    @mobleylee8950 8 років тому

    I'm still grabbing but I wish they would've kept the color blue instead of Concord

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Yea seems a lot of people wished the same. would have been nice.

  • @tims6966
    @tims6966 2 роки тому +1

    Milky sole > icy sole

  • @quintonm.5314
    @quintonm.5314 8 років тому

    I hated and sold my 09's. They were extremely uncomfortable and the banana shape effected sizing too. I like the 16's better

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Damn that sucks to hear. I am glad though you had the chance to grab the new release.

  • @rashaddeacon
    @rashaddeacon 8 років тому

    absolute must cop...

  • @Anthony-xl3fx
    @Anthony-xl3fx 8 років тому

    How good is the leather is a good quality on 2016

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Sorry for the late reply, by now, I am sure you have them but I think the quality is good.

  • @worldztune852
    @worldztune852 6 місяців тому

    The 09 pair padding is fit better for a low.

  • @2ill1313
    @2ill1313 8 років тому

    09's are better for me. I don't like that high patent leather. I bought them because this is my second Jordan shoe with some actual blue and white color contrast. The high patent leather is not attractive compared to the 09 regardless of how true to the original release may be. But as you said SF, its nothing too off to complain. Or maybe its the fact that I'm not too into 11's and the fact that I'm used to seeing the low patent leather for so long.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      I 100% respect. We are use to seeing the lower patent leather through the years...most have got used to it. Wonder how the patent leather will be in the future.

  • @dcjnr923
    @dcjnr923 8 років тому

    correction, the 2016 model isnt the one in the movie. It's what he wore when he first came back

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Yes, that is correct. I stated that on my previous video. He wore the number 23 in the movie.

  • @markbilog3632
    @markbilog3632 8 років тому

    great content keep it up

  • @mr._durden_
    @mr._durden_ 8 років тому +1

    Ridiculous. Reading the comments is torture. 09s have better quality? 09s and 00s are similar quality? Wtf?!? Dummies. The 2016 are as close to the OG as you're gonna get. The concord jumpman, the higher THICKER patent leather cut. He wore "45" when he came back, the jams he wore had "45" on the heel. I swear these kids know nothing and just make shit up.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      You are right about everything...However, in the movie he did wear the 23..but on court, he wore 45.

  • @WhiyuMario3
    @WhiyuMario3 8 років тому

    hows the sizing difference ? please some one comment

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Sizing difference between the 09 and 16? I will try and find out.

  • @keith2008cccc
    @keith2008cccc 8 років тому

    hows the sizing?

  • @mrraffle81
    @mrraffle81 8 років тому

    B Bryan stay grinding respect rasta

  • @derekdaniels9906
    @derekdaniels9906 8 років тому

    dope comparison👍I don't know like you sed their both dope but I do know something both retros are missing an that is the jumpman jam on the tongue like my 2000 pair instead of jumpman Jordan an to be honest I really don't consider the 2016 pair spacejams because of the 45 these are MJs PEs from the 1995-96 playoffs vs.the 23 which are the spacejams.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Thank you! Yea you're right they are missing that. really a big difference. I didn't mention that in this video because I said it in my unboxing..probably should have though.

  • @marticus1642
    @marticus1642 6 років тому +2

    The 2016 pair looks fake tbh I was never a fan of the og design of jordan 11s because it made the shoe look bulky. Now after seeing this I can honestly say I like the 2009 wayy better

  • @pokemonassociate2238
    @pokemonassociate2238 3 роки тому

    The 2009’s just look odd compared to the 2016 ones. (I like the 2009 retros)

  • @Brad-fo1wq
    @Brad-fo1wq 8 років тому

    The 2016 pair jumpman looks more flat. I remember the 09 pair jumpan kind of poked a little I guess is the word

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Interesting...most of overlooked that.

  • @TheDanKyu
    @TheDanKyu 8 років тому

    09 for me cause I loved the movie space jam and I wanted to be similar to the movie, not the P.E. But still, 16 is cool too.

  • @dafatboy2
    @dafatboy2 8 років тому

    Why did they do a higher cut? That's not necessarily true to OG form.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Original release did have a higher cut patent leather

  • @001spring
    @001spring 8 років тому

    Blue tint looks awesome

  • @mr.sourcreamsupreme2180
    @mr.sourcreamsupreme2180 8 років тому

    I like the 2009 with less patent leather up the sides

  • @oDarlynHD
    @oDarlynHD 8 років тому

    2016 pair looks amazing

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Yea I am really happy with them.

  • @fbx03
    @fbx03 8 років тому

    the new patent is super high compared to actual og 11s. the og patent was high but not that high

  • @sneakercrazy16mn54
    @sneakercrazy16mn54 8 років тому

    wow there is a big difference between those 2 lol damn I got the 09 pair can't wait to get the 2016 but I like the 2016 more it looks so dope good video bro

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +1

      Yea there are some big differences. Were you able to get them? Appreciate the compliment as always

    • @sneakercrazy16mn54
      @sneakercrazy16mn54 8 років тому

      SneakerFiles.com yes man thank God I was able to double up on these they look so dope better than 2009 thanks for responding to all my comments

  • @flashrug_
    @flashrug_ 8 років тому

    the official name for the 2016 "space jam" is "monstar mash". so technically the aren't the same shoe. jordan brand is calling the 9s the space jam 9. I definitely love both shoes but would chose the 2016 pair

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      I mean, monster mash is apart of Space Jam..but we all have our own opinions.

  • @lbnycity89
    @lbnycity89 8 років тому

    I really did not like the 2009 version when I first saw it I was like what is this? And I almost went down to flight club and have them give me the 2000 release. This is my favorite Jordan of all time and I take this very seriously when it comes to the Space Jams. I personally never had the 2000 version back in the day and that upset at me back then but since I have a chance to get them now my pair is in my closet right now the 2016 version. And I love the sneakers.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      I am happy you love them and got them! Much respect

  • @treronsinclair9810
    @treronsinclair9810 8 років тому +1

    They give us the one's they suppose give in 2009 i remember the photo's