Chemists are hacking fashion to save the planet | Just Might Work by Freethink

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 лис 2021
  • Fast fashion is endangering the planet. These chemists are fighting back | Shay Sethi, CEO of Ambercycle
    Subscribe to Freethink on UA-cam ►► freeth.ink/youtube-subscribe
    Up next ►► The ugly truth about toxic e-waste • The Ugly Truth About T...
    Our clothes don’t die - or, at least the non-biodegradable textiles that they’re made of don’t usually get a second life.
    In 2018 alone, 11.3 million tons of those textile mixtures waste ended up in landfills, the EPA says. And the lion’s share of that waste comes from clothing - over a billion garments worth.
    Fast fashion - a term used to describe an industry that relies on fast manufacturing and styles that quickly go out of vogue - is reliant on these textiles. A June 2021 report by London’s Royal Society for Arts (RSA) found that more than 80% of some offerings on websites contained new plastic in them, and despite recent media attention, clothing companies are still slow to adopt truly recycled garments into their product lines.
    While there are clothes made from recycled polyester, calling them “recycled” is a bit disingenuous - in fashion, most polyester recycling pulls the plastic from water bottles, not clothing
    Ambercycle CEO Shay Sethi is deploying a different, proprietary form of recycling, one that separates materials at the molecular level. It’s called chemical recycling, and the technique allows Ambercycle to pull plastic fibers from textiles, leaving the fibers unharmed and ready to be used in new clothes.
    Read the full story here ►►www.freethink.com/series/just...
    ◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠
    Read more of our stories on recycling:
    Recycling robot keeps waste out of landfills
    ►► www.freethink.com/environment...
    Can tech rentals solve the problem of electronic waste?
    ►► www.freethink.com/technology/...
    A sweet way to recycle cotton - turn it into sugar
    ►► www.freethink.com/environment...
    ◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠
    About Freethink
    No politics, no gossip, no cynics. At Freethink, we believe the daily news should inspire people to build a better world. While most media is fueled by toxic politics and negativity, we focus on solutions: the smartest people, the biggest ideas, and the most ground breaking technology shaping our future.
    ◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡
    Watch our original series:
    ► Hard Reset: freeth.ink/youtube-hard-reset
    ► Just Might Work: freeth.ink/youtube-just-might...
    ► Challengers: freeth.ink/youtube-challengers
    Enjoy Freethink on your favorite platforms:
    ► Daily editorial features: www.freethink.com​
    ► Solutions-based stories, straight to your inbox: www.freethink.com/subscribe
    ► Facebook: / freethinkmedia​
    ► Instagram: / freethink​
    ► Twitter: / freethinkmedia​
    ► Join the Freethink forum: / freethinkforum
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 63

  • @freethink
    @freethink  2 роки тому +4

    How do you think we should make clothing sustainable?

    • @alexfrank5331
      @alexfrank5331 2 роки тому

      Nobody needs 20 pairs of shoes, 14 jackets, and 60 shirts.
      The things that brainwash us to think we need so much fast-fashion? The brainwasher need to be destroyed.

  • @karenstimson2683
    @karenstimson2683 2 роки тому +57

    How much energy does the process take, and how much water, compared to using non-recycled materials? These are important questions when evaluating any new process.

    • @ganiakara
      @ganiakara 2 роки тому +6

      Sure, they should have talk about that in this video.

    • @spicychad55
      @spicychad55 2 роки тому +2

      The water "lost" is probably minimal. Agriculture is much more wasteful with it. I guess people are ok with micro plastics going into every body of water just to "save" water.

    • @freethink
      @freethink  2 роки тому +13

      Great questions! There are some answers to these on their FAQ page (ambercycle.com/faq/) though they don't get into specific numbers.
      "How much less energy is used in the Ambercycle process?"
      "We are actively working on producing a high-quality Life Cycle Analysis of our process, especially as we ramp up production in our plant. So far we see a significant reduction in energy use and CO2 emissions through the Ambercycle process as compared to virgin polyester production. Energy and emission savings exist both from the production of the raw material as well disposal of the finished good. For example: material that is Ambercycled is not getting landfilled or combusted into greenhouse gases. "
      "Are there any impacts of your process on the environment?"
      "Ambercycle’s mission is to end ‘waste’ in fashion, therefore all of our processes must contribute to that goal.
      Emissions from Ambercycle process plants are minimal compared to the vast emissions savings associated with avoiding petrochemical polyester production. We also purify all raw materials that enable our process, allowing us to reuse them for further cycles. In this way the economic and environmental aspects of having a clean process go hand-in-hand."

  • @dentistrider3874
    @dentistrider3874 2 роки тому +2

    Fast fashion doesn't just create huge amounts of waste. Cotton is grown in India, shipped to China to be processed, then to Bangladesh to be sown, then to Columbia to be tagged, then to the US to be sold. Then 10% of this clothing gets thrown away, making all those greenhouse emissions in transport, all that under-payed labour, all that water and pesticides, useless. Fast fashion shouldn't keep growing. It needs to end.

  • @Megan-nt7dm
    @Megan-nt7dm 2 роки тому +24

    This is so cool, I want to see this company get huge. We need to get to a circular economy asap

    • @freethink
      @freethink  2 роки тому +1

      Glad you liked it! Really exciting to see a lot of new circular economy startups emerging, hoping it's a matter of time before they can make it work in many industries at scale!

  • @dragonskunkstudio7582
    @dragonskunkstudio7582 2 роки тому +6

    Slow fashion: Go to the salvation army to shop for clothes. Brand new T-shirt except says conference 2014 but it was never worn. Clothes should be worn as many times in public as it can till it starts to look tarnished then it's laze at home category clothes, then it becomes dirty work clothing, to a rag, then to recycling.

    • @freethink
      @freethink  2 роки тому +4

      Great advice. The full phrase is "Reduce, Reuse, Recycle" but often people focus on just the third step. While perhaps not as exciting, the first two steps in the funnel are even more important and are something we can all do right now.

  • @catserver8577
    @catserver8577 2 роки тому +4

    This is great for reducing waste. But as someone who has allergies, I wish there were just more natural fiber choices. Polyester is awful. Nylon and spandex are only slightly more irritating. I am not saying polyester or synthetic fabric clothing should not exist, I just wish it was not so pervasive.The amount of natural fiber clothing is sparse and it's expensive.

  • @nutzeeer
    @nutzeeer 2 роки тому +2

    I still have clothes from 10 years ago, so I am not part of this problem

  • @az55544
    @az55544 2 роки тому +1

    What about the plastic that is released into the water cycle each time these clothes are washed?

  • @REIwAlexY
    @REIwAlexY 2 роки тому +2

    agreed, and I personally despise the shift to stupid blends of poly or spandex. has become much harder to get 100% cotton clothing even tho many synthetic fibers mess with skin.

  • @neagacosmin8265
    @neagacosmin8265 2 роки тому +15

    Good idea! But what happens with the rest of the "soup" after they take out of it the recycled polyester?

    • @0525tharindu
      @0525tharindu 2 роки тому +4

      Don't think it's a perfect solution, but better than being dumped or burned

    • @timng9104
      @timng9104 2 роки тому +6

      that was my thought as well, they skipped the part where they solved the challenges? why is not everyone doing it? what did they do differently?

    • @freethink
      @freethink  2 роки тому

      Great question. There's a general answer on their FAQ page (ambercycle.com/faq/):
      "Are there any impacts of your process on the environment?"
      "Ambercycle’s mission is to end ‘waste’ in fashion, therefore all of our processes must contribute to that goal.
      Emissions from Ambercycle process plants are minimal compared to the vast emissions savings associated with avoiding petrochemical polyester production. We also purify all raw materials that enable our process, allowing us to reuse them for further cycles. In this way the economic and environmental aspects of having a clean process go hand-in-hand."

  • @theQuietWire
    @theQuietWire Рік тому +1

    What effects do these resynthesised materials have on the human body? Companies should always assess impact on the human systems first, and then the earthly environment.

  • @andreas11735
    @andreas11735 2 роки тому +2

    I love this. Maybe one of the best things I've seen. Well done! So much more to do though.

    • @freethink
      @freethink  2 роки тому

      That means a lot! Appreciate your kind words.

  • @areacode3816
    @areacode3816 2 роки тому

    Great channel. This year was the first I realized clothes can harm the environment.

  • @walkersmith1663
    @walkersmith1663 2 роки тому +4

    What an amazing concept. The editing is fabulous.

    • @freethink
      @freethink  2 роки тому

      So glad you liked it, thanks for watching!

  • @shadowdee7372
    @shadowdee7372 2 роки тому +4

    Saving the world in the smartest way possible I love it

  • @BabiesKillYou
    @BabiesKillYou 2 роки тому +9

    This is a great initiative! Really loving the things your channel is covering ✌🏻❤️🌎

    • @freethink
      @freethink  2 роки тому +1

      So glad to hear! Thanks for watching, really appreciate it!

  • @jamesdouglas5859
    @jamesdouglas5859 2 роки тому

    Cycora sells t shirts that are made with 20% cycora fabric and 80% polyester

  • @andrewemery5151
    @andrewemery5151 2 роки тому +1

    Is there a playlist for this background music? Also the lighting

  • @Charlie-ci2cb
    @Charlie-ci2cb 2 роки тому

    they should sell these devices so people at home can do it too

  • @Bubblessongs
    @Bubblessongs 2 роки тому +1

    Hopefully they keep it affordable so it clicks on

  • @user-bp8yg3ko1r
    @user-bp8yg3ko1r 2 роки тому +1

    Great video, very interesting!

    • @freethink
      @freethink  2 роки тому +1

      Glad you liked it, thanks very much!

  • @fhd21
    @fhd21 2 роки тому

    Recycling is costly and would most likely have a carbon footprint. Just tax plastic production to force big corps to look for alternatives. Tax it as much as required.

  • @aaronknight1009
    @aaronknight1009 2 роки тому

    Makes very good sense, I hope their philosophy is adopted by all the clothing manufacturers

  • @steveq34
    @steveq34 2 роки тому

    How do you fund a company like that. Very curious to know!

  • @cryxbaby2250
    @cryxbaby2250 2 роки тому

    I've been thinking this for a while. Wish people had the brains to be resourceful. We consume to much it triggers parts of the brain that's addicting. Too late to turn back now

  • @somerandomfella
    @somerandomfella 2 роки тому

    We don't need new clothes every few weeks. Monks wear the same clothes and they're happy as..

  • @sandrawong6787
    @sandrawong6787 2 роки тому

    Hey I noticed a weird thing when I accidentally got hair stuck in a hydraulic press
    The hair flattened and looked a little like a shiny,plasticky looking material
    Could that material replace plastic with some modifications?

  • @wovasteengova
    @wovasteengova 2 роки тому +1

    Now this is why I started watching freethink

    • @freethink
      @freethink  2 роки тому +1

      Cheers, always good to see you Wovasteen!

    • @wovasteengova
      @wovasteengova 2 роки тому

      @@freethink 💖💖💖

  • @Drownee
    @Drownee 2 роки тому

    i commented something here a while ago where has it gone wtf :(

  • @thechancellor-
    @thechancellor- 2 роки тому +3

    To the ^incredible person* seeing this, I wish you all the best in life❤ don't over blame yourself, accept things and go forward. Don't let others define what “success” is for you. Get up, learn the skills needed and get after it, all the keys to a happy life is in your hands. Keep pushing.

    • @PlayMoGame
      @PlayMoGame 2 роки тому

      Why do you copy/paste this on every Freethink video?

  • @fflopez
    @fflopez 2 роки тому +1

    Hmm polyester is plastic, I doubt you can recycle it indefinitely. During the cycle you'll create micro plastics and quality degrades. Some recycling processes is false green.

    • @kennstack
      @kennstack 2 роки тому

      Agreed, recycling biodegradable fabrics would be better. There is some recycling with cotton, wool and Lyocell. Hemp and linen can also have a relatively low environmental impact.

  • @s-gaming8003
    @s-gaming8003 2 роки тому +2

    just dont buy new fashion

  • @undr_guv_surv
    @undr_guv_surv 2 роки тому

    They should focus on using mushrooms to break plastic down into food. A yeast with genes for it would make it very efficient

  • @Luke..luke..luke..
    @Luke..luke..luke.. 2 роки тому

    Will from Hannibal?

  • @anuragsinghanant6355
    @anuragsinghanant6355 2 роки тому

    Why just polyester?

    • @freethink
      @freethink  2 роки тому

      Their goal is to eventually cover all textile materials. At the moment, they are focusing on polyester and handing off the cotton they salvage from the process to other partners who can reuse or recycle it. ambercycle.com/faq/

  • @aprila3203
    @aprila3203 2 роки тому

    You had me until “Digital Passport?”

  • @CUBETechie
    @CUBETechie 2 роки тому +1

    Fast Fashion Bann simple

  • @robertsamson4610
    @robertsamson4610 2 роки тому +1

    The thumping music is annoying.

  • @BobWidlefish
    @BobWidlefish 2 роки тому

    I’m seriously skeptical this is commercially viable. Sounds like a green subsidy company.

    • @beedoo000
      @beedoo000 2 роки тому +2

      there’s already a handful of athletic wear companies that turn plastic water bottles into fabric, and they’ve proven to be very commercially viable in the mid-high price range. I think they’ll figure it out.

    • @BobWidlefish
      @BobWidlefish 2 роки тому

      @@beedoo000 I hope so, that would be awesome!

  • @Teleutefero
    @Teleutefero 2 роки тому

    making garbage luxurius