Physics for sure I get that. But look at the scenery. It looks worse than my FSX lol. This is unacceptable look for year 2024. This was unacceptable 5 years ago. There is no way how to sugarcoat it. XP needs to step up their game, made some coop with google maps and use the same technology as MS does with Bing maps.
I agree (kind of)...I Mean from X-Plane 11 to 12, it hasn't changed a bit lol, although I'm using ridiculously low graphic settings, MFS still looks a lot better (even with al settings at "super low").I can give credit to DCS when it comes to graphics combined with physics as major proof that Laminar is way behind everybody, but I still have several criticisms of the MFS Flight Model. Anyway, besides graphics I feel more immersed in flights on X-Plane than MFS several times...Aircraft behavior with tailwind, ground effect, hover, and autorotation, I really enjoy a lot more doing those things on X-Plane...
@@rotorcraftsimulation MSFS flight model is basically fsx. It is not good I tell you that. it feels like flying on rails, but MSFS brought masses to the simulator genre. It will never be the same. All of a sudden there is not majority of "hardcore simmers" with payware aircraft like pmdg only and everything less is bad. Now the majority is happy when they get essentially same aircraft with different exterior model. It is very visible with fighter jets. If you wouldnt tell me I couldnt tell if I fly F-15, F-18, F-22, F-35 (unless in STOVL lol) or Rafale/Gripen/Eurofighter. If I would consider only the physics I would say I'm in the same aircraft and it doesnt even matter if you are empty or fully loaded with 10 tons of ordnance :D
Physics for sure I get that. But look at the scenery. It looks worse than my FSX lol. This is unacceptable look for year 2024. This was unacceptable 5 years ago. There is no way how to sugarcoat it. XP needs to step up their game, made some coop with google maps and use the same technology as MS does with Bing maps.
I agree (kind of)...I Mean from X-Plane 11 to 12, it hasn't changed a bit lol, although I'm using ridiculously low graphic settings, MFS still looks a lot better (even with al settings at "super low").I can give credit to DCS when it comes to graphics combined with physics as major proof that Laminar is way behind everybody, but I still have several criticisms of the MFS Flight Model. Anyway, besides graphics I feel more immersed in flights on X-Plane than MFS several times...Aircraft behavior with tailwind, ground effect, hover, and autorotation, I really enjoy a lot more doing those things on X-Plane...
@@rotorcraftsimulation MSFS flight model is basically fsx. It is not good I tell you that. it feels like flying on rails, but MSFS brought masses to the simulator genre. It will never be the same. All of a sudden there is not majority of "hardcore simmers" with payware aircraft like pmdg only and everything less is bad. Now the majority is happy when they get essentially same aircraft with different exterior model. It is very visible with fighter jets. If you wouldnt tell me I couldnt tell if I fly F-15, F-18, F-22, F-35 (unless in STOVL lol) or Rafale/Gripen/Eurofighter. If I would consider only the physics I would say I'm in the same aircraft and it doesnt even matter if you are empty or fully loaded with 10 tons of ordnance :D
@@Izmael1310 Yup, totally agree with you In the end graphics does matter a lot