Oldest Most Authentic UFO Photos? - McMinnville UFO And The Trent's Photos

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @davedavidson8208
    @davedavidson8208 28 днів тому +5

    I want you to know I really enjoy your more grounded takes on the mysterious or weird stories. it makes the actual unexplainable that much more interesting. there is far too much hyperbole and people who are ready to believe anything these days.
    I hope you keep making more.

  • @IamaKaliedoscope
    @IamaKaliedoscope 26 днів тому

    I do love your paleontology videos but these paranormal/supernatural ones are just so much fun.

  • @DraptorRonin
    @DraptorRonin 28 днів тому +4

    “I think it was one of our own”
    In other words, he didn’t think it was being piloted by aliens, but people from the government. That, to me at least, makes me think that the photos *might* have been real (or at least perceived to be real).

  • @JAGzilla-ur3lh
    @JAGzilla-ur3lh 28 днів тому +1

    Their authenticity is pretty debatable, but these photos are so iconic either way. 🛸
    I come in peace with this offering for your leader, the algorithm, and I'll be back to actually watch the video soon!

  • @JAGzilla-ur3lh
    @JAGzilla-ur3lh 23 дні тому +4

    And I watched it. Typical in-depth EDGE quality. If I'm being honest, I think the object is a car mirror hanging from a wire. It looks small. The photos are striking and utterly iconic, but they don't convince me. I don't care, though. Where UFOs are concerned, I don't put much energy into worrying about truth. There is truth out there, but I don't know how much fun it will turn out to be. The mystery is fun. The lies and hoaxes are fun. I like the phenomenon as it is. Maybe the Trent photos are legit, maybe they're not, and I'm fine existing here in the middle.

  • @godslaughter
    @godslaughter 27 днів тому

    Debunking and proper analyses of things like these are the best. Also, I'm surprised that it was claimed the object was "large" in the first article, to me it looks like it's the size of a wheel cover or a pot lid.

  • @koopajuniorsavannah5170
    @koopajuniorsavannah5170 28 днів тому +2

    I doubt it but sounds interesting.

  • @markheath465
    @markheath465 28 днів тому

    Nice. I love it.

  • @notoriousbigmoai1125
    @notoriousbigmoai1125 28 днів тому

    If the object was real, how fast did it move? The photo seems very clear and doesn't show blurry effects to suggest it is moving across the sky. You would expect that a UFO of that size would fly quite fast and be difficult to capture with an old camera.

  • @Daniel-jk7pe
    @Daniel-jk7pe 27 днів тому

    I am a big believer but I think McMinnville photos are bunk

  • @korrafey1044
    @korrafey1044 28 днів тому

    Early

  • @malakiblunt
    @malakiblunt 20 днів тому

    "back in the 50's -you had to get you photos developed before you could see them " 🤣 this was still the case untill the late 90's - and in fairness to the trents - photographs were expensive and you absolutely waited until you had used up the film before developing them - but that flying saucer still looks fake as fuck

  • @reeyees50
    @reeyees50 27 днів тому +1

    Fake af bro cmon you a science channel

    • @EdgeOfReality420
      @EdgeOfReality420  27 днів тому +2

      I discussed the scientific analysis of these photos, did I not?