Stargate SG-1 "Menace" Final Scene (English)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 сер 2024
- Possibly the most beautiful and emotional scene of Stargate SG-1.
Posiblemente la escena más bonita y emotiva de la serie Stargate SG-1.
Final Scene from episode "Menace"/"La Amenaza" (Season 5/Temporada 5).
No Copyright infringement intended. All Rights Reserved STARGATE SG-1 TM Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc.
![SG Atlantis - Horizon & Replicator Retaliation [HD]](/img/n.gif)
So I just started listening to this podcast where a group of friends are going through the series with someone who's never seen Stargate before. The newcomer in question is named Rhys (pronounced Reese). Occasionally they quiz him on what he remembers, and they play the "Reese, your father made you WRONG" line if he doesn't get all the questions right.
Get into the Gate, a man after my own heart.
@@noblevi3623 "Get into the Gate"...is that the "podcast"?
I like "your father made you wrong" for some reason I can't forget this line since I watched the episode few years ago :)
i'm sure there's a good reason friend
the most beautiful and emotional scene is with replicant nr 5 and hi betrayal by sg1
the writing was good in this scene in that oneill didn't try to rush the guy doing the cutting like he could go any faster after carter said the replicators were acting on their own, usually actors are told to do that
@Nibinaear I think because Atlantis was more of a star trek/sciencey series. Sg1 had more of a moral/human feeling/mystery of existence style to it.
Haha, as I watched this episode all I could think was “All of these people would be completely deaf after this.” 😅 All that firing inside of concrete tunnels… kiss your hearing goodbye.
O'Neill did the right thing.
Is it just me or did the various _Stargate_ series each express an anti-robot/android/AI sentiment? With the exception of Daniel Jackson, I can't remember *anyone* pushing back against the "It's just a machine." argument.
I agree with Jack here. When you think about it, Daniel was being extremely selfish. The base was being overrun. Was everyone on the base less important than one android? I disagree.
Weren't they pretty well justified in that? Maybe Reese was a good machine, but I can't think of any machine intelligences in Stargate that weren't pretty much omnicidal.
@@richardkenan2891 well the RoboSG1 wasn't, 5th while slightly unstable was mostly good-hearted and only went bad after the first and only people he showed compassion for stabbed him in the back and at least part of the Asurans were still quite nice despite again being betrayed and backstabbed by their creators.
Truth be told it seems as if a good percentage of hostile AI in Stargate was hostile because of the treatment they received from those around them rather than inherently hostile.
@@richardkenan2891 well the RoboSG1 wasn't, 5th while slightly unstable was mostly good-hearted and only went bad after the first and only people he showed compassion for stabbed him in the back and at least part of the Asurans were still quite nice despite again being betrayed and backstabbed by their creators.
Truth be told it seems as if a good percentage of hostile AI in Stargate was hostile because of the treatment they received from those around them rather than inherently hostile.
@@Ares99999
You are not directly responding to the question. That is do we at some point have moral responsibility towards AI that experiances the world like we do.
In the case of Urgo Sam thought that this was the case.
What you bring up is a different problem.
Mainly utilitarianism vs responsibility towards and the rights of indifiduals.
And i think that if we are talking about friends or people he likes jacks we don't leave our people behind stance actually showes jack does care about indifiduals to some extend.
He actually showed that sentiment to an alien he did not know very well.
Also jacks robot counterpart told him when he died are we still so far from real to you?
And jack responden with.
No, i gues not.
All this being said it is true that the android did not show herself to be very trustworthy.
Learn how to use the volume in videos.
What O'neill did could have been what destroyed the Asgard race... :( I think he would have waited if it had been a human. O'neill has always been the least humanist when it comes to other forms of life.
Weren't the Asgard pretty much doomed from the start? The replicators wiped out much of their empire, but they were still around when the replicators (in our galaxy) were defeated. They died because they had reached the limits of their chosen path of evolution and could not shift tracks to one with more potential, IIRC. The replicators might have killed enough of them to make it a crisis *NOW* instead of a crisis *SOON*, but the Asgard were doomed regardless.
@@richardkenan2891 That's certainly possible, but the replicators destroyed the vast majority of the Asgard empire. See what they did with 1 planet, and imagine what they might have managed with more.
Lots of their human-interaction is replicator-caused, but without the bugs, they would have been able to take the war to the Goa'uld.
Given they had a long-standing alliance prior to the withdrawal of the Ancients, I found it odd that they didn't ask for help from the established biological experts - the Nox.
midtownman6, I agree with you.
I mean, I do like Jack on some episodes throughout the whole series, but he's always been pretty cynical about other cultures and their beliefs. He has some of the attitude "let's get down to business".😠
He didn't entirely agree with the Nox's ways of life and policies, not even the Tollans, the Tok'ra or the Asgard. Not mention, he also had a problem with the Rebel Jaffa's ways like their intense training. I didn't find their training methods any different from how the Samurai and Ninjas of Japan were taught.
Of course, I understand that Jack was also concerned and values life, but what he fails to understand is that he can't tell the Jaffa what to do. He can't tell any cultures how to live their lives. Plus, he's just...more comfortable with his own ways.
No the asgard tried to Revive her the just failed the robot died
The only down side of this is O'Neill missed Daniel.
Damn dude xD
^ Moron.
Well wouldn't be the first time he shot him
@@victorselve8349 I don't think he would have come back after being shot with a USAS 12.
@@rageagaintstheNWO I mean historically speaking death has not done that much to slow him down
she was too unpredictable. Reese coudnt be trusted because of her emotional instability. A likely flaw that would of never changed.
The Asgard could have taken a crack at her software.