'Both India And China Have Limited Military Options In The Middle Sector'

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 140

  • @sankalpdravid
    @sankalpdravid 4 роки тому +9

    Both the generals sounded so well-experienced, eloquent and scholarly, that I felt the discussion should have continued longer to the fuller satisfaction of the audience and even the participants. 😊🇮🇳🙏

  • @mandalindranil
    @mandalindranil 4 роки тому +35

    CCP is worried about Gokhale sir ...I am loving it ...great show indeed

    • @tejassingh6800
      @tejassingh6800 4 роки тому

      @Albert Moore He is referring to the recent official public condemnation of Nitin Gokhale's video which was calling Xi as "Xitler" by the Chinese Embassy in India .
      Here's the video which was officially condemned and an apology was demanded : ua-cam.com/video/-zPPD8lQSEk/v-deo.html

  • @saiecorp5646
    @saiecorp5646 4 роки тому +8

    Strategic news global is doing great job of bringing military generals on forum to discuss matters of national importance.

  • @illuminatusdeus3051
    @illuminatusdeus3051 4 роки тому +16

    My view, the Chinese have a habit of patrolling across the LAC, not the Indians, correct? What stops them from disappearing everytime they do that? Plausible deniability and message is sent. Let them come, let these guys go missing, eventually, they either start a war, for which they will be responsible in diplomatic circles, or they stop! The point is, as long as Indians don't go to their side of the LAC, Indian soldiers don't go missing, right? Countries like China need to be dealt with hard power, they only respect strength. After their casualties in Ladakh, I am sure their opinions have changed about India. Sure, they can venture in, but whether they will be able to venture out is another issue all together.
    The point is impose a cost - if they come in and walk out, they do not have the fear factor, they come in and do not go out, others coming in will have that fear factor. India needs that fear factor and that needs to be done through imposition of heavy costs unto them. It's not like people won't die, at least they are dying for a purpose and direction. Better dying in a fight then dying in the cold when the Chinese release the flood gates or use nailed bats.

  • @umardharini2011
    @umardharini2011 4 роки тому +2

    Our Humble salute to all the THREE HEROES of INDIA ~ RESPECT !! .... OMG !! , Those Tongue twisting names of the region flows , as a mugged up kid !! -- #JaiHind #IndianArmySalute

  • @TheHarveySpectre
    @TheHarveySpectre 4 роки тому +2

    This channel needs a million subscribers. Very fair, unbiased and excellent discussions, unlike the mindless screaming on Republic TV.

  • @rakeshkumar-mo4ev
    @rakeshkumar-mo4ev 4 роки тому +3

    Very informative talk by both the Generals. I am looking for the next round. -- Rakesh kumar (72 yrs) Amritsar

  • @kaptaan_original
    @kaptaan_original 4 роки тому +5

    Sardar Ji looks like 2x size of Nitin... that chair is too small.

  • @utkarshtiwari6768
    @utkarshtiwari6768 4 роки тому +3

    I like this channel.. the analysis done by the officers r very good..

  • @vi4409
    @vi4409 4 роки тому

    Best military news channel... I hope this channel grows alot... Friends please share this channel to everyone for it to grow

  • @kunalgarg5218
    @kunalgarg5218 4 роки тому

    I asked for this video in last episode and today you made it
    Thabkyou sir

  • @RahulReW
    @RahulReW 4 роки тому

    In the noisy times of TV news its a relief to see such informative programmes with good Subject matter experts. You are doing a great job of informing our countrymen with good informative maps and brilliant guests, please keep it up.
    On a side note, a small complaint would be this episode kind of digressed from the actual middle sector as compared to the earlier 2 episodes. Would have loved if you focussed to share more info on the middle sector as this is one of the less well understood part of the India China dispute.

  • @jungleowl
    @jungleowl 4 роки тому +4

    I very much loved the suggestion on border management that we should make it known that any incursion or intrusions on the perceived line of control will be dealt with decisive action militarily. But will our govt deliver on this remains to be seen.

    • @johnwickuk4971
      @johnwickuk4971 4 роки тому +1

      “Decisive military action”?? 😂😂😂. They invaded us and were spineless to do ANYTHING IDIOT!!!

  • @ipabrol1263
    @ipabrol1263 4 роки тому

    Very valuable discussion !

  • @ramamurtipaluri2420
    @ramamurtipaluri2420 4 роки тому +3

    My question to our Generals is do we have enough troops with replacements to fight two front war in all sectors with our enemies. The problem with this program is no one interacts with viewers.

  • @sunilnambiar5326
    @sunilnambiar5326 4 роки тому +2

    Great Discussion.. Thanks..

  • @rohitagarwal5293
    @rohitagarwal5293 4 роки тому

    Very Nice.
    Keep up the Good Work , going forward.
    Regards.,

  • @namanbhayani1016
    @namanbhayani1016 4 роки тому

    @nitin you should interview Hawaldar Nihal Singh who fought in Rezang La

  • @mohindersingh1435
    @mohindersingh1435 4 роки тому +1

    Very good analysis of borders

  • @damusamy8599
    @damusamy8599 4 роки тому

    What a word by the General that Borders are not negotiable. Superb.

  • @atchyutuniharshakeyboardis4143
    @atchyutuniharshakeyboardis4143 4 роки тому

    Nicely presented

  • @surendrabarsode8959
    @surendrabarsode8959 4 роки тому

    Excellent discussion. However, please note that 1- there are too many places mentioned in rapid succession and therefore, instead of focusing on showing faces, maps should be shown and be frozen for proper understanding 2- voices of both the Generals are not very clear many times. Perhaps text can be added so get full clarity 3- Nitin should not talk over when Generals are talking. Please do detailed discussion on this important topic in a serial manner. Thanks

    • @surendrabarsode8959
      @surendrabarsode8959 4 роки тому

      @ahjotson ahjotson Thanks for your detailed response. I agree that China has indeed achieved much more than India in economic terms. But it is a racist, irredentist and supremacist power. My limited point is that since we cannot take on China alone, we take help of West to achieve our goals rather than be the instrument of the West. Of course, there has been a give and take and that is par for the course.

  • @SuryaBSingh
    @SuryaBSingh 4 роки тому +1

    Why Chinese were not prevented from entering our area in Laddakh?

  • @realisticapproach6621
    @realisticapproach6621 4 роки тому

    I there any indian forum where there is no biest analysits

  • @karthikeyamurthy
    @karthikeyamurthy 4 роки тому +1

    oh this, discussion should have been much longer... both these gentlemen should be given more time @19:50 felt really bad... i wanted to hear him fully.

  • @SarbatdaBhala1469
    @SarbatdaBhala1469 4 роки тому

    Informative discussion ...

  • @praveendugar4122
    @praveendugar4122 4 роки тому

    Very informative video

  • @RandhirYNWA
    @RandhirYNWA 4 роки тому +2

    But what is the financial cost of war? No one is talking about the most important thing for country, is the country capable of facing financial war? Are India Capable financial war?

    • @chamankhan7396
      @chamankhan7396 4 роки тому

      Money no problem we want war with China right know modi ghando gere na karo

    • @RandhirYNWA
      @RandhirYNWA 4 роки тому

      @@chamankhan7396
      13 most expensive wars in U.S. history.
      13. War of 1812
      • U.S. war spending
      (2019 dollars) $1.78 billion
      • Duration: 2 years, 8 months
      • U.S. military deaths: 15,000
      12. Mexican-American War
      • U.S. war spending
      (2019 dollars) $2.72 billion
      • Duration: 1 year, 9 months
      • U.S. military deaths: 13,283
      11. American Revolution
      • U.S. war spending
      (2019 dollars) $2.75 billion
      • Duration: 8 years, 5 months
      • U.S. military deaths: 4,435
      10. Spanish-American War
      • U.S. war spending
      (2019 dollars) $10.33 billion
      • Duration: 4 months
      • U.S. military deaths: 2,446
      9. American Civil War (Confederacy)
      • U.S. war spending
      (2019 dollars) $22.99 billion
      • Duration: 4 years
      • U.S. military deaths: 750,000 (North and South)
      8. American Civil War (Union)
      • U.S. war spending
      (2019 dollars) $68.17 billion
      • Duration: 4 years
      • U.S. military deaths: 750,000 (North and South)
      7. Persian Gulf War
      • U.S. war spending
      (2019 dollars) $116.6 billion
      • Duration: 7 months
      • U.S. military deaths: 383
      6. World War I
      • U.S. war spending
      (2019 dollars) $381.8 billion
      • Duration: 1 year, 7 months
      • U.S. military deaths: 116,516
      5. Korean War
      • U.S. war spending
      (2019 dollars) $389.81 billion
      • Duration: 3 years, 1 month
      • U.S. military deaths: 36,574
      4. Vietnam War
      • U.S. war spending
      (2019 dollars) $843.63 billion
      • Duration: 17 years, 9 months
      • U.S. military deaths: 58,220
      3. War in Afghanistan
      • U.S. war spending
      (2019 dollars) $910.47 billion
      • Duration: Since 2001
      • U.S. military deaths: 2,285
      2. Iraq War
      • U.S. war spending
      (2019 dollars) $1.01 trillion
      • Duration: 7 years, 5 months
      • U.S. military deaths: 4,410
      1. World War II
      • U.S. war spending
      (2019 dollars) $4.69 trillion
      • Duration: 3 years, 9 months
      • U.S. military deaths: 405,399
      US has spent $6.4 trillion on wars in Middle East, Asia since 2001

    • @RandhirYNWA
      @RandhirYNWA 4 роки тому +2

      @@chamankhan7396 victory in war involves not only success on the battlefield but also the economic power and economic stability of a state. War finance covers a wide variety of financial measures including fiscal and monetary initiatives used in order to fund the costly expenditure of a war.

    • @RandhirYNWA
      @RandhirYNWA 4 роки тому +2

      @@chamankhan7396 War finance is a branch of defense economics. The power of a military depends on its economic base and without this financial support, soldiers will not be paid, weapons and equipment cannot be manufactured and food cannot be bought. Hence, victory in war involves not only success on the battlefield but also the economic power and economic stability of a state.

    • @chamankhan7396
      @chamankhan7396 4 роки тому

      Don’t worry modi ghando never fight with china if u want war with china Ghand mea dum hona chia

  • @ab-zp2ll
    @ab-zp2ll 4 роки тому

    Great discussion and great panel

  • @virendrapalsingh2846
    @virendrapalsingh2846 4 роки тому

    Very good series on China border with expert speaking ,who have the knowledge of the area, looking forward for the fourth discussion on the subject

  • @anuragbari9535
    @anuragbari9535 4 роки тому +5

    I hope that one day you start a course affiliated to a university.

  • @kaptaan_original
    @kaptaan_original 4 роки тому

    @illuminatus deus They don't seem to have the necessary "dham" to impose such a cost. Indian army should have a plan formulated to retake all of aksai chin. at this time india should embark on massive arms development and acquisition with Russia as partner and at the same time use France/ Israel as development partners like they did with Barack 8 and Brahmos. Partner with France and next gen version of Rafael or partner with Russian on SU-57.

  • @jiva106
    @jiva106 4 роки тому

    Great view , nice information

  • @riteshr9477
    @riteshr9477 4 роки тому +5

    I think it will be a grave mistake on our part to write off chinese threat from any theater of action. As is their proxy nepali oli is creating issue with lepulekh pass and they have also started amassing troops there. Lizard can do any kind action misadventure at any sector so it is in our best interest to be vigilant at all times.

  • @blunderer409
    @blunderer409 4 роки тому

    Refreshingly articulate panelists..

  • @pntikoo123
    @pntikoo123 4 роки тому

    So informative..

  • @BelloBudo007
    @BelloBudo007 4 роки тому

    I really enjoy the format & listening to the various experienced military guests. This helps someone like me, who lives overseas, just what is going on & where it's going on. I'm not quite sure as to why it's going on. I think it might be as some kind of distraction to China's efforts & failures elsewhere. But that's just a guess.

  • @shivamshukla9736
    @shivamshukla9736 4 роки тому +1

    ​It should be of 30 min , suggestion , And like to listen Gen. Pannu perspective more in future

  • @grvd97
    @grvd97 4 роки тому

    Well said...There can not be any compromise on borders. Borders and areas are the assests of the local people. They must be gaurded. Of late We must also get back the compromised/ lost strategic sectors and areas.

    • @jackytang3683
      @jackytang3683 4 роки тому

      Yes, 100% agree with you. To us Chinese, one inch land mean one inch blood. Those economy interests or money is nothing when comparing to the sovererty of land

    • @grvd97
      @grvd97 4 роки тому +1

      I heard UA-cam is banned out thr...and dont talk about lost blood, winnie the pooh must be watching.

  • @anupampaul7342
    @anupampaul7342 4 роки тому

    this has been a lovely session. thank you Gokhale sir.

  • @espotter-zu7pp
    @espotter-zu7pp 4 роки тому +1

    The biggest mistake of the regime here was asking the forces from chinese intruded points to back to their positions and again reporting it to the nation as brawl/violence at borders is spineless. The army should have been asked to stay put at all forward positions and really our forces could had pushed back the occupation forces back to 1962 agreed LAC. Now policy makers here are pushing for acceptance of April 2020? status quo, funny! Doing it would have blocked many future conflicts and give a less unclear situation for our forces at borders. What to say, they have gathered tanks to large battalions months earlier to the conflict and India here just have started to declare their military ammunition manufacturing policy.

  • @commonerIndian
    @commonerIndian 4 роки тому

    nice discussion..thanks

  • @Fitnessdocumented
    @Fitnessdocumented 4 роки тому

    Please let us know in which areas indians dominate strategically in the middle sector

  • @Tintin-gv9ir
    @Tintin-gv9ir 4 роки тому +1

    We need to uplift our capability and capacity. Defense budget requires an upgrade and USA who wants an alliance can help . We give ( Alliance ) and take technology and help to make us from a defensive to offensive force
    114 F15ex , F18 for Navy and another 36 Rafael ( On ground within 1 to 5 years ) will allow us air superiority over Himalayas , Tibet and Indian ocean . Plus Pakistan might have an answer and might keep their fighters grounded and hidden
    A deal stuck with USA for our airforce , navy and army plus defense manufacturing help with Indian private sector participation

  • @संजयगोस्वामी-ग6ह

    What about our enclaves in Mansarovar??! We must do a mil ops

  • @thesaffronbharat
    @thesaffronbharat 4 роки тому +1

    great JAI HIND

  • @reachbalaiyer
    @reachbalaiyer 4 роки тому

    Ramram sathya hai, jai ma barathi. We salute you sir.

  • @jackytang3683
    @jackytang3683 4 роки тому

    Sad no discussions or tv channels on India China tensions in China, only know the disputes and conflicts from India media

  • @RandhirYNWA
    @RandhirYNWA 4 роки тому

    13 most expensive wars in U.S. history.
    13. War of 1812
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $1.78 billion
    • Duration: 2 years, 8 months
    • U.S. military deaths: 15,000
    12. Mexican-American War
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $2.72 billion
    • Duration: 1 year, 9 months
    • U.S. military deaths: 13,283
    11. American Revolution
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $2.75 billion
    • Duration: 8 years, 5 months
    • U.S. military deaths: 4,435
    10. Spanish-American War
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $10.33 billion
    • Duration: 4 months
    • U.S. military deaths: 2,446
    9. American Civil War (Confederacy)
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $22.99 billion
    • Duration: 4 years
    • U.S. military deaths: 750,000 (North and South)
    8. American Civil War (Union)
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $68.17 billion
    • Duration: 4 years
    • U.S. military deaths: 750,000 (North and South)
    7. Persian Gulf War
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $116.6 billion
    • Duration: 7 months
    • U.S. military deaths: 383
    6. World War I
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $381.8 billion
    • Duration: 1 year, 7 months
    • U.S. military deaths: 116,516
    5. Korean War
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $389.81 billion
    • Duration: 3 years, 1 month
    • U.S. military deaths: 36,574
    4. Vietnam War
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $843.63 billion
    • Duration: 17 years, 9 months
    • U.S. military deaths: 58,220
    3. War in Afghanistan
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $910.47 billion
    • Duration: Since 2001
    • U.S. military deaths: 2,285
    2. Iraq War
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $1.01 trillion
    • Duration: 7 years, 5 months
    • U.S. military deaths: 4,410
    1. World War II
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $4.69 trillion
    • Duration: 3 years, 9 months
    • U.S. military deaths: 405,399
    US has spent $6.4 trillion on wars in Middle East, Asia since 2001

  • @hritikjuyal5484
    @hritikjuyal5484 4 роки тому

    Let's hope both Char dham highway and Railway will get finished on time. This will improve Indian Army's logistics.

  • @AKS-qq1fw
    @AKS-qq1fw 4 роки тому +1

    Superb programme. India needs to plan to take Gilgit,Baltistan & POK from Pak & also plan to make Tibet independent even with the help of USA to push China away from us.

  • @danmaster9183
    @danmaster9183 4 роки тому

    Loved the info respect from the USA

  • @sguptamech
    @sguptamech 4 роки тому

    Good dicussion

  • @carryon2197
    @carryon2197 4 роки тому +1

    Wonder why the matter is always someone taking away our land & we left with planning how to defend our territory. Why can't it be vice-versa? Why didnt we intrude across LAC & hold down territory as per our stated boundary? Why not in the 70 long odd years go across loc & reclaim our own territory? What are we waiting for? Pakistan aarti utaar ke amantran dega ki chalo aap aajao aur lelo aapka zameen? Why are we always concerned with defending our territory whereas our frickin neighbours always thinking of taking away our land? When will this change? It has to be vice-versa. India strengthen yourself. 70 odd years is quite long already.

    • @nestser
      @nestser 4 роки тому

      Lady Anon I don't see "mature" in India's forward policy in 1962.

  • @RandhirYNWA
    @RandhirYNWA 4 роки тому

    But what is the financial cost of war? No one is talking about the most important thing for country, is the country capable of facing financial war? Are India Capable financial war?
    13 most expensive wars in U.S. history.
    13. War of 1812
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $1.78 billion
    • Duration: 2 years, 8 months
    • U.S. military deaths: 15,000
    12. Mexican-American War
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $2.72 billion
    • Duration: 1 year, 9 months
    • U.S. military deaths: 13,283
    11. American Revolution
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $2.75 billion
    • Duration: 8 years, 5 months
    • U.S. military deaths: 4,435
    10. Spanish-American War
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $10.33 billion
    • Duration: 4 months
    • U.S. military deaths: 2,446
    9. American Civil War (Confederacy)
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $22.99 billion
    • Duration: 4 years
    • U.S. military deaths: 750,000 (North and South)
    8. American Civil War (Union)
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $68.17 billion
    • Duration: 4 years
    • U.S. military deaths: 750,000 (North and South)
    7. Persian Gulf War
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $116.6 billion
    • Duration: 7 months
    • U.S. military deaths: 383
    6. World War I
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $381.8 billion
    • Duration: 1 year, 7 months
    • U.S. military deaths: 116,516
    5. Korean War
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $389.81 billion
    • Duration: 3 years, 1 month
    • U.S. military deaths: 36,574
    4. Vietnam War
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $843.63 billion
    • Duration: 17 years, 9 months
    • U.S. military deaths: 58,220
    3. War in Afghanistan
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $910.47 billion
    • Duration: Since 2001
    • U.S. military deaths: 2,285
    2. Iraq War
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $1.01 trillion
    • Duration: 7 years, 5 months
    • U.S. military deaths: 4,410
    1. World War II
    • U.S. war spending
    (2019 dollars) $4.69 trillion
    • Duration: 3 years, 9 months
    • U.S. military deaths: 405,399
    US has spent $6.4 trillion on wars in Middle East, Asia since 2001.

  • @rajivtripathi5742
    @rajivtripathi5742 4 роки тому

    Sir, I would like to have a one to one interaction with you regarding Indian defence preparedness. Please message me if you are ok, you may not post this on UA-cam, just wanted to have a conversation, I am an ex NDA passout, please let me know. A big thumbs up to your interviews.

  • @AbrahamPanicker
    @AbrahamPanicker 4 роки тому

    Correct, India need to push LOC west wards get back Gilgit-Baltistan area. This will stop China's influence into Arabian and Pakistan's free resources. Cut the snake off in the middle.. Both will separated ends will wag their heads and tail separately for some time and then die...Great discussions..Very detailed.

  • @murugesanramasamy99
    @murugesanramasamy99 4 роки тому +2

    Liberate Tibet thats what India should do.

  • @kaptaan_original
    @kaptaan_original 4 роки тому

    If you aren't deployed in the Central sector you'd better believe the Chinese are going to take it soon.

  • @karangajare4848
    @karangajare4848 4 роки тому

    Very nice episode. But I would like to advise the nitin Sir to be focused on the topic and not diverge across various topics such as Xinjiang, Aksai Chin, etc.

  • @shuangbiaogou437
    @shuangbiaogou437 4 роки тому +2

    Xin Jiang literally translated as 'new teritory' has got its name at the time of Qiang Long emperor. It was called new territory because it was the last territory in the west of China that was conqured by Manchurian as an foreign ruler. Xin Jiang has been part of china since Han dynasty when Chinese defeated Huns. It was given a name as Xi Yu Du Hu Fu. So new territory was relative to Manchurian as foregin ruler, not to Chinese. But since China terminated the monarchy and formed the republic, it did not change the name back.

    • @saiecorp5646
      @saiecorp5646 4 роки тому +1

      "Xinjiang province belonged to China , had been part of Han chinese empire " is another lie peddled by chinese media and CCP. Xinjiang was independent province, sometimes under control of Turmenistan and in 16th century, under protective custody of China, under manchu emperor. Culturally it is close to Turkish people not Han Chinese. China has no right to demolish and destroy their culture. Kushan kings ruled kashgar, hotan, part of central asia and India, that does not make India to make claim on Xinjiang. It would be laughable claim.

    • @shuangbiaogou437
      @shuangbiaogou437 4 роки тому

      @@saiecorp5646 you are talking BS. Do you know how many ethnic groups were living in XinJiang? You better do some research about the silk road. You can find all of the information of silk road from all countries history book. And XinJiang was called Yu Du Hu Fu. It used to be important trade port of China. It had been living mixed race. Just like GuangZhou nowadays.

    • @saiecorp5646
      @saiecorp5646 4 роки тому +1

      @@shuangbiaogou437 that doesn't make it part of China. Han Chinese/ CCP have forcibly occupied it and now changing its demography. CCP who boast of liberating downtrodden should start liberating Uighurs first.

    • @shuangbiaogou437
      @shuangbiaogou437 4 роки тому +1

      @@saiecorp5646 sounds exactly like how india treat Kashmir, Sikkim, Assam and Manipur. Liberate Kashmir, Sikkim, Assam, Manipur first.

    • @saiecorp5646
      @saiecorp5646 4 роки тому +1

      @@shuangbiaogou437 liberate Xinjiang, Tibet, Manchuria, outer Mangolia and after all liberate billions of chinese who are devoid basic human rights and freedom under CCP. Bring democracy in China.

  • @lifvee24
    @lifvee24 4 роки тому +3

    New sectors will be opened by china in coming months...

    • @vve2059
      @vve2059 4 роки тому

      China has opened and fortified enough playing fields. Next attack will be informal war

  • @jackytang3683
    @jackytang3683 4 роки тому

    There are no reports about India affairs in China, hope we have same scholars and channels to discuss the problem. At least India is a big country, we should not ignore the existence of our neighbor.

    • @Hayat208
      @Hayat208 4 роки тому

      jacky tangChinese people have been kept in the dark by your communist party and Xitler about the recent border fights with India and loss of over 100 poor Chinese soldiers at Galwan.

  • @murugesanramasamy99
    @murugesanramasamy99 4 роки тому +3

    We keep on talking china will occupy more of India land.

  • @rajanithyananthamnithyanan7828
    @rajanithyananthamnithyanan7828 4 роки тому +1

    UNWANTED TALK ABOUT INDIA AND CHINA BORDER REALLY THE BORDER IS TIBET NOT CHINA CHINA CAPTURE TIBET INDIA DID NOT HELP TIBET DURING CHINESE AGGRESSION ON TIBET

  • @saurabhdwivedi7123
    @saurabhdwivedi7123 4 роки тому +1

    "God made time but man made haste"

  • @a.k.1960
    @a.k.1960 4 роки тому

    War in the middle sector is unlikely as china is only interested in accessing bay of Bengal and arabian ocean for its business interests.war in the middle sector doesn't serve that purpose.

  • @pravinutankar2107
    @pravinutankar2107 4 роки тому

    Jai Hind

  • @shivamsrivastava9296
    @shivamsrivastava9296 4 роки тому

    Both frigging big guys.

  • @krishantewari2376
    @krishantewari2376 4 роки тому

    Xi-Tler the murderer video has been made viral.

  • @chamankhan7396
    @chamankhan7396 4 роки тому

    No more talk we want action no more Ghando gere

  • @louisewatson6211
    @louisewatson6211 4 роки тому

    This is not America's land United for the fact that you're human beings

  • @abhishakekumar6800
    @abhishakekumar6800 4 роки тому

    One time they will come and dont go and u fool keep on sitting

  • @changamanga100
    @changamanga100 4 роки тому

    The real question is, why is Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka abandoning India. Why did Iran kick out India. Is it distrust of India and 'enough is enough' to the bully India ?

  • @shuangbiaogou437
    @shuangbiaogou437 4 роки тому

    The true reason that china-india border dispute can never be solved is due to the fact that indian beleives tibet should be part of india. But indian keep saying here and there to cover what they really want from China.

  • @mghngm1179
    @mghngm1179 4 роки тому +1

    Jai Hind