The French aircraft carrier, supreme technology | SLICE
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 лип 2020
- The Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier is the flagship of the French Navy.
This ship is the first and only nuclear-powered surface combatant vessel built in Western Europe. By 2019, France is the only country, outside the United States, to have completed the construction of a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier. The French aircraft carrier is a major military and political asset enabling France to assert its authority worldwide.
Extract from the documentary: "Warships: 400 Years of History"
Direction: Lionel Langlade
Production: ZED and BONUM Productions
SLICE wants to fill up your curiosity!
Accessible to anyone from anywhere at any time, this channel is your weekly dose of short docs about curious facts, discoveries, astounding info, unusual stories, weird, fun and instructive. Be smart, have a slice!
Subscribe now ►►► / @slicedocumentary
Follow us 👇
Facebook: / slicedocs
Instagram: / slicedocs
the French have excellent engineers, they produce all their weapons, nuclear submarines, combat planes, tanks, aircraft carriers, artillery systems, ... everything. and this is remarkable in today's world, especially with the budget they devote to their defense which is 14 times less than the American budget. If all of Europe acted like the French, Europe would have by far the first army in the world and the most technologically advanced.
Hubo un presidente estadounidense no me acuerdo quien, dijo la calidad del armamento francés era incuestionable pero si su cantidad!!!
1:42 «30 Rafale and 1 Hawkeye...» literaly showing two E-2C Hawkeyes on flight deck.
hahaha
maybe 1 standby and another 1 maintenance
@@BeelZebub_Azunyan it wouldn't be on flight deck for maintenance I guess
As of 2024, France operates one aircraft carrier: the Charles de Gaulle (R91)12. This formidable vessel serves as a mobile airstrip and warplane hangar, capable of carrying and deploying aircraft without relying on a local air base. The Charles de Gaulle has played a vital role in France’s naval capabilities and global operations.
Charles de Gaulle is actually quite beautiful to look at.
i have to say, the Charles De Gaulle is a real carrier....too many countries claim this label, only the French, US and the UK carry that title.
French carriers do not have capable aircraft the British fly F-35B,they would destroy the entire French airforce and sink all their ships with no losses.
Pretty sure China and India should join the list
@@_Chad_ThunderCock Indian and 2 Chinese carriers and use Soviet Kuznetsov Class design, while China recently has build one using a new design.
@@loyesluise7621 I don't see what's the issue with that... Besides UK uses ramps too
UK carriers are a joke, idk if those should be called carriers
Nice looking ship. Really needed a second carrier to assist with availability
yeah one for the north, and second for mediterranean ops
It was the plan, but it was stopped by the new administration for cost cutting measures.
Yes atleast incase the other one needs refit, the other can replace its job❤
Very cool. Hopefully they use it well in global conflicts in service of the French peoples interests!
French navy is one of the nost powerful navies in the world today
"Whatever you say, Frenchie."
-A sailor, U.S. 7th Fleet
For bathtub warriors,the French were Nazis just like the Germans for the majority of the war, they both support Russia with billions of Euros are are too cowardly to supply Ukraine with weapons.
@@darthslackus499 lucky the US military has Emma and her two moms
@@-mathijs shushhh....We don't talk about Emma and her two moms. She's Army anyway...'nuff said.
@darthslackus499 Hard to go against the French. They won ww1. They lost more men than the USA has in every war in its existence combined, in that one war.
Next generation raphael of charls de Gaulle of UA-cam
This guy has the same voice as the one from World of Warships documentary.
nice
Hope to be in it.
Hard to believe that the old Ark Royal (R09) was only about 50 feet shorter but displaced almost 54,000 tons at full load in her final few years. Always wondered why the French built their nuclear carrier so small...
this is all about budget to built and mentenenence.....
Pose toi la question pourquoi plusieurs officier américains dise en off le charles de gaulle fait pratiquement le même travail qu'un porte avion américain avec deux fois moins d'avion , on pourrai se posé la question
Les porte avion américain serait il trop gros !
Un voiture roule plus vite qu'un camion .
Because there is no need for it to be as big as Americans carriers. With his catapults and most advanced aircrafts it is doing the job perfectly. the only need we, french, have is to get a 2nd one to replace it when the 1st is on maintenance.
Someone saying it’s to save money, bro this carrier was a financial disaster
Nuclear powered carriers will be a disaster when they go into Naval warfare especially smaller ones because the Reactors will be hit and all onboard will be contaminated and the fleet won’t be able to help
remarkable commentary of the very highest order
Why did you make the thumbnail picture a mirror image? The Island on all carriers since a couple of Japanese WW2 ones is on the right hand side.
Smaller in size than gigantic Nimitz class or new Gerald Ford class career. Reason obvious for French military themselves know.
Cest un choix les porte avion français
On pas les même besoins que les état unie il est prévu pour 30
rafale la plupart des mission il par avec 20 rafale parfois 15 c'est suffisant pour les mission a l'origine il était prévu deux porte avion pour remplacer les deux ancien un seul faute de budget pas de réel politique la quantité de chasseur c'est une chose l'efficacité une autre puisqu'il fait pratiquement le même travail qu'un porte avion américain selon les officier américain un rafale peut décoller toutes les 30 seconde sur pa américain c'est toute les 45 seconde
The French navy is modern well organized and very well equipped their crews are well trained and fit they look battle-ready with well-armed ships, the RN have a lot to learn,
Are you mental? The Royal Navy have 2 larger carrier, of which the French originally wanted Britain to build one for their navy, we’re so in-superior you for the longest time felt we could do a better job then your own industry. Likewise as lovely as the French fighter’s are the Royal Navy fields better 5th gen F-35’s. Also the Royal Navy, have one of the best and longest aircraft carrier history’s behind the Americans. You’re a blind patriot and your whole point is just stupid. Yes of course the French carrier is impressive with amazing fighters, but pick a fight with a nation more on your level.
The French carrier is much less capable than RN ones because the French don't have capable fighters.Queen Elizabeth flies F-35B's,while these have less range and capabilities than A and C variants, it doesn't matter as once in the sky they can be refueled and they'd have a 100 to zero kill rate against French fighters.
Even the US does not fly F-35C's off of the Gerald Ford it will take time to get the elevators and EMALS systems up to combat readiness,I do like nuclear power, and France has the most clean energy in the world ,when they can get their reactors running, which most of them should be back in service just in time to save France tens of billions the Germans have to pay for LNG.
@@paulbedichek5177 French have 45type destroyers gives no bother RN 45 is getting fixed as are the carriers a shambles really.
@@thecurlew7403 Translate to English.
@@paulbedichek5177 English means a pigs ear buddy.
Cette armada peut faire la guerre toute seule contre les pirates turcs 👍👍👍👍🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱
Only one E-2 Hawkeye? There where 2 in the video. With a in flight duration of 8 hours, plus factoring in maintenance, there should be at least 4 E-2’s.
Early morning aircraft? 🤣🤣
I hope we get a EU army so we can start mass producing things to actually get some results. We can rival any superpower but instead we bitch and moan against each other. We united our aircraft manufacturer to rival boeing and succeed extremely well with airbus, we can do it with our military industry as-well. MBDA is a great cooperation when it comes to our missile developments and manufacturing.
There is no united Europe today Europeans are dying in trench warfare barbaric for a barbaric people, the Germans and French give no help despite their armed being useful against the primitive Russians.
Without the United Started keeping them apart Europeans fall into murdering each other immediately.
You can't spell superpower. You can't even defend European soil against the Russian barbarians. You paid Russia for 40 years billions a day and now you sit helpless.
watch out for falling propellers
wow after the USA and the french do magic with nuclear fuel, made nuclear aircraft carriers. NO fuel required 7-10 years, but guards eat more fuel (Destroyer, submarine...)
We also have Several Nuclear Powered Submarines to guard it.
In fact, the Fuel Ship that goes alongside, is set only for Frigates and Aircrafts on CDG desk. Better than if we had to refuel every one. It doesn't make the CDG eternal during deployment, but it significantly increase its deployment capability.
The USN regularly deploys multiple Super Carriers for at least 6 months at a time. How long can your Navy be deployed? At fleet speeds it takes more fuel to move a Super Carrier then the rest of the task force combined. This is why we kept our CVN'S while retiring the rest of our nuclear powered surface fleet at the end of the Cold War. USN Carrier taskforce resupply at sea while under way if they need something double quick our Super Carriers have C-2 cargo planes. No other Navy has this ability the USN has been doing it for half a century.
@@rburns9730
Indeed. We didn't deny it.
It's just we have "only" 40 billion € defense budget and a country of 67 million people. And we have virtually the same projection of force ability thanks to nuclear powered carrier. But again we do not have your amount of carriers.
@@MACcER34 I wasn't giving the French a hard time I was asking the OP what they have. At least the CDG has interoperability at the Fleet level with the USN. We can launch and retrieve each other's aircraft. The UK has two glorified LHD's and a handful of inferior airframes with no real cross platform capability. In a world where fossil fuels are becoming super expensive the French aren't going to be asking for fuel to move their carrier. Everyone else will be at the mercy of an industry everyone wants to kill.
@@rburns9730 That is because Americans value freedom.
Modern ships, wargaming?
Good hello, good time, the help of a barge near the equator to the geographic coordinates N:01.18,E:51.22
🇪🇺👍
QUESTION: if the nuclear ship gets a direct hit will the nuclear reactor then spread nuclear waste within the sea and marine life for the next 1,000 years ???? Let alone the atmosphere???? Chernobyl and Fukushima. ... (HMS hood took a direct hit, when the designers said it couldn’t happen)
Answer : comme le nez au milieu de la figure , les soviets ont fait des brise-glaces nucléaires ( i.e. more or less civilian use )sinon , nuclear prop. is military , hence u hit anything nuclear = war , immediate response deserves to un-pile ur stock of ICBM through subs , bombers , m.be satellites etc. All in all u can check around 2,425 global trials of nukes have been detonated up to now... What Einstein did say ? ....Quote 'after 3rd WW , 4th one 'll be made with clubs & stones' , that is if anybody still alive cares
exocet hypersonic are under development by french in secret now , exocet is the very best and reliable long range missile to destroy many....
What most people don't know is salt water is an excellent insulator for radiation. One foot of seawater is the equivalent of one inch of lead. So an exposed reactor at the bottom of the ocean would only be dangerous within a few feet of the reactor.
yeah i know, humans... imbecils.
Those who designed the Hood knew exactly what could happen to it seeing as it (exploding) happened to three other battle cruisers at Jutland.
Its smaller in size because it has to cross strait of zibralter? 2014 indian navy chief jokes it is ready with 1billion $ cheque if usa could sell india an aircraft career ! Then the delay of admiral gorshkov to indian navy was in news. Remarkable small size career like Charles de Gaulle .
No, limited by the shipyard where it was build.
It was not the biggest in France aka Saint Nazaire (also Europe), but Brest Shipyard.
Your thumbnail is reversed.
la photo est tirée à l'envers
What?
Hello , can somebody tell me why the rafflale plane, which is a good plane, have that ugly stick in front of the window.?
Why they don't hide it or make o hole in the fuselaj to retract It?
stick which is used for refueling in the air by cargo tanker planes, no need to hide it, this plane is very good as its
Because a retractable system mean more potential failures and more maintenance, wich decrease the average availability of the plane while having no operational advantage.
Lego
LOL at the salty erdogan lovers in the comments
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
The Corona boat
French spreading Covid-19 ?????
@@trevorhart545 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_on_Charles_de_Gaulle
@@ttemp2631 Thank You
Raffle is latest gen? Pffft okay
1:47 lol a carrier is NOT the most advanced/sofisticated thing made buy humans
What is then? These are floating cities
@@kstreet7438 Particle accelerator, Photolithography machines, self landing rockets etc. Carriers are just more expensive than it necessarily being a technologicaly challenge.
The British aircraft carrier ar a joke ! They only have 4 F 35 each. eight between both of them.🤣🤣🤣 The Charles de Gaulle may be small but very efficient yeah it's been proved
4 each? Look online there’s countless videos and photos of it with at 20+ on flighdeck accompanied by wildcats and Merlin helicopters
Rare footage of the tub when it is not in ship repair
Mon pauvre enfant ...
It has more availability than a Nimitz ship...
Every sailor has a white flag tucked under their racks just in case
Average Virgin Cringe Brainless Fatherless Anti France Troll Fanboy taking Copium over here ⬆️
🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷
@Mack Vela you Lol ,
Even you are stupid in your knowledge of war, I know it's a French ship, but that ship could drift if attacked by the Turkey Navy
Toypkia pays bidonville primitifs nomades asiatiques.
К экономическим и финансовым проблемам Соединенных Штатов Америки прибавились еще и проблемы с регионами. Семь штатов, среди которых Техас и Флорида, собрали необходимое количество голосов для выхода из США. При этом сепаратисты ссылаются на Декларацию независимости. Ситуация настолько неординарная, что аналитики теряются в оценках происходящего.
Добровольцы с бывших украинских территорий, готовы оказать посильную помощь в поддержке вооружением и обучении военному Делу войсковых формирований штатов, борющихся за свободу и независимость против американского тоталитарного режима 🔥🇺🇸✌️
The pot calling the kettle black 🤣 What about the Russian totalitarian regime????
@@francinesicard464 Ах-ха-ха-ха-ха! Дегенерато - каждому своё! Иди с Богом!
This is not the most advanced ship, this woman doesn’t know what she’s talking about. The French finally get a small carrier and think there in the best now. They have a long way to go to even compare to the US Navy. But I hope they do along with the British so they can start taking some of the deployments off of the US fleet.
US budget $800B
French Budget $47B
Size is not everything, a nuclear carrier is a big adventure in technology, not only the reactors, but everything on board.
@@hermes6910 good then the French can start taking responsibility for conflicts in there own back yard and the US can start backing off and building up stock piles of bombs.
*_SLAPS AIRCRAFT CARRIER_*
This baby can -colonize- exploit so many african countries!
Needs refueling every 7 years?? Considering its nuclear, this carrier must be costing France a fortune. They would be better off scraping it's and going electric/diesel like the British have
If you think Nuclear power is more expensive than conventional propulsion, you must be having a laugh mate.
@@thibaudduhamel2581 It actually is, expecially when you consider the decommissioning costs
@@Spartan-jg4bf which were known when building the ship. Ever wondered why America doesn't go back to conventional powerplants for their new gen aircraft carriers? It's both safer and cheaper to go nuclear. I'd add that, given the huge investment by France in civilian nuclear, the fuel costs are quite low, as the CDG reactor uses civilian grade nuclear fuel.
@@thibaudduhamel2581 Nuclear on ships isnt cheaper or safer, do you know anything about decommissioning of nuclear waste? Its not cheap, what nuclear power gives is lots of energy to power up and coming technology, rail guns, laser etc. The key thing people say about nuke power is it gives unlimited range which isn't true. All the surface escorts are not nuke powered and the ship still has to take on new supplies of food and water. If a nuke carrier sinks it will create an ecological disaster that would take 100s of years to clean up. The US can afford nuke carriers as they have a 700 billion budget.
US and china : *laugh
😂😂 just to raise white flag within 48 hours 😂😂
et toi tu peux me dit ton pays et qui a gagné un doigt dans cuq
😂😂supreme technology pffft over engineered out dated tech ....the French will never be a super power and I'm not telling them why....can you guess
On devine que vous en êtes une belle de "puissance" vous ... je ne dirai pas de quel genre !
Well, France was a super power in tye past and actually have like the 6th or 7th strongest millitary of the world
France population: 68M
World population: more than 7B
What a surprise..
Mostly paid for by French ex-colonies in Africa
lol... bullshit
Educate yourself instead of saying bullshit, the settlements cost a lot more money than they brought in. everything is falling apart since the countries gained their independence. No more serious schools, hospitals worthy of the name of road infrastructures etc ... I suggest you do your research and read serious documents,
@@dominique4700 The French paid small bribes to the African leaders and carted away their natural resources for free. Any African leaders that refuse to accept the bribe and want France to pay for the stuff they take will face economic sanction or worse, toppled by French sponsored military coup.
@@fadlya.rahman4113 1676 / 5000
Résultats de traduction
So stop saying nonsense, your information is completely wrong. why African countries want the French to leave if this country pays bribes to leaders. On the other hand, get information directly from people in direct contact with Africans. the french, like most other countries use african resources yes, but in return for a lot of indirect aid, which other countries like russia and china do not do which are only there to exploit the African. they help these countries financially and industrially at first, while knowing that africa will not be able to keep its commitments and there, lack of luck for the africans, they will be required to put themselves completely at the mercy of these countries. we can see the result with montenegro which can no longer repay these debts with china and unfortunately, this china is setting up in return. africa is unfortunately unable to take charge of itself. many times many world countries which have known war have started from scratch and have been able to develop and these countries are now rich, they have worked, developed their skills, their industries. Africa has always failed to do this and always relies on others, they will never manage to take charge of each other, always wars, rivalries, presidents who get rich at the expense of inhabitants. not generalize of course, some countries are developing without outside help and it is very good to stop blaming everything on the colonizers and go ahead, try to fend for yourself.
@@dominique4700 Je crois que vous perdez votre temps, ça ne vaut même pas le coup de répondre à pareilles (*) !
What a cute dingy boat 😂 somehow the French always manage to emasculate anything… even their aircraft carriers…
Not gonna lie, it is probably the ugliest carrier built in the last 50 years.
Bruh there are a dozen carriers that look worse than this. One that comes to mind is the last enterprise
@@CFS1822 WHO cares lmao on the if it is ugly or not
Average Virgin Cringe Brainless Fatherless Anti France Troll Fanboy taking Copium over here ⬆️
Early morning aircraft? 🤣🤣