Read his books. The latest one, "Fundamentals", explains a lot of physics in a brilliant way. I knew a lot of what he discusses there but he gave me new perspectives on many things.
This was a really great interview...I was glued to the screen the entire time...I appreciate you having him on your show...kudos. On a side note...you couldn't have picked a more prototypical looking guy for being a "scientist" could you....messed up hair, broken glasses that are taped up and keep falling down his nose, a pocket full of pens...I LOVE IT...this man get's it...he doesn't care what people think about him 'cuz he's too busy doing smart stuff ....again, I love it.
Very interesting conversation. What I like best about Robert Lawrence Kuhn is his ability to ask pertinent questions without inserting his own ego. If you can bring other great physicists and scientists in this format, with well-segregated sections on each personality's key achievements - as you did with Frank Wilczek. That would be fantastic for us who follow your podcast regularly
I wonder what you think he has been doing? I admire Robert’s ability to stay abreast of so many topic areas that he has relevant questions for leading edge peeps.
We're putting new coversheets on all the TPS reports before they go out now. So if you could go ahead and try to remember to do that from now on, that'd be great.
A big question that haunts me & I don’t have an answer to is this, if Robert can find answers to - What happens when you know all the secrets of the world? What would life look like? Would it not be better to stay naive than loose the magic of curiosity?
Everything in our universe is energy, vibrating in a harmonic coherence that creates the great cosmic symphony. Physicist Dr. Theresa Bullard reveals that our power of observation determines how our reality manifests, making us players in a masterpiece of universal proportions. also A conscious entity capable of generating information by observing. Matter doesn't exist until we observe it . (Frank Wilczek)
Congrats to your guest. Great video. If human scientific endeavors have existed for a billionth of one percent in relation to the age of our universe, I would caution against thinking we've unraveled everything worth knowing.
For me it raises the question: what standard we use to measure what. Human knowledge is finite and limited which means no real reflection from the side of scientists that how and what they are dealing with but they are creating law like expression how the world works, instead of realizing that they knowledge is only a fragment of the whole picture and should be warn sign how they use their fragmented knowledge to apply to our life.
Do you find it odd how Lex can get interviewees on this level, but also spends valuable time on people like Rogan and J Peterson? I’m asking because I noticed this discrepancy, but havent communicated with others who watch both programs and wondered if it was a shared observation
'I think what you could do, what you must do, is go to what science is to what could be if we want to think about what science is going to mean for our future" Frank Wilczek
Re: "Does that mean that 'should' is a subset of 'could'?" - just recently I was watching a video where Tony Blake had asked JG Bennett "What is the original sin?" and Bennett answered: "Not doing what you can do, and trying to do what you cannot do." - it seems to fit nicely with the should and could statement!
When you translate the languages, in to English, sometimes, the meaning of your words changed , and your words and the meaning also changes as results!
I was chucking about the comment "To me God is a work in progress". I was thinking to myself afterwards that it's ok. God feels the same way about you as well. Ha ha. A little Christian humor. Not bashing at all. It was thought of in love not out of spite or animosity. Great conversation.
@@chrisbennett6260 there are 2 types of truth: 1. Personal truth. Subjective. Each of us have a personal truth. 2. Universal Truth. Nobody knows. It is beyond human comprehension. What Robert seeks is universal Truth but he is pragmatic enough to know it is impossible So he aimed to get pass personal truth and get "closer" to universal Truth. We find truth from facts. But facts alone are not enough.
Hello Profrssor Wilczek, once again the problems that keep alluding us has cropped up once more in your video. With respect, may I make some suggestions which may give cause for constructive cosideration. ' Dark Matter ', an incredibly small Negatively charged monopole particle, called a ' Harveytron ', that fills every available empty space in the atom and every available empty space throughout the universe, forming a cloud. The presence of this ' Harvetron cloud ', is what provides a medium in which all electromagnetic radiation and gravittional waves can propogate and travel through space. The force exerted by these particle trying to repel each other in every direction is the ' Dark energy '. ' Dark Energy ', is the force that is causing the universe to expand. It is also one of the forces of gravity, which I believe is a force of both attraction and repulsion in an interplay between positive and negative particles. I believe that there exists only two fundamental particles that make up everything that exists in the universe, The negatively charged monopole ' Harveytron ' particle, and a corresponding positively charged monopole called a ' Dannytron '. In combination, these two particles make up all of the atomic nuclei, everything else are soley the negatively charged particles. These particles may turn out to be impossible to detect at the present time, because they are so small. They are are so small that I believe that all of the particles making up the nucleus of the atom are composites of these particles. I am happy to explain more if you are interested. Kind regars Tony Marsh.
I don’t dispute the expansion of the universe but if space has no gravity and it’s gravity that groups together all the mass out there , planets , galaxies, suns , black holes all the objects out there then as the universe expands and the distances between galaxies and stuff become larger and gravity plays less and less a part than of course the expansion would speed up but it didn’t just start from nothing.
A few hundred years ago, who would have believed that, by mixing stones, metals and vegetation, we would create a robot that could compute, walk and talk?
Everything in our universe is energy, vibrating in a harmonic coherence that creates the great cosmic symphony. Physicist Dr. Theresa Bullard reveals that our power of observation determines how our reality manifests, making us players in a masterpiece of universal proportions. and A conscious entity capable of generating information by observing. Matter doesn't exist until we observe it . (Frank Wilczek)
Frank has interesting ideas, this reminds me of a tentioned spring coming back to is origanal position when realesed because it has a memory.Our mids run clockwise so its not that intuitive to think that a partical can run anti clockwise. But quantum mechanics is not that intuitive.Does God play dice or is the universe deterministic?
Everything in the universe appear as energy and forces or beauty, all of which do not exist except for our sensual feelings of heat, touch and visual color respectively. In reality all that exist is mysterious emergent fields at all levels.
Let’s talk about 50/50 chances. The released object is approaching the earth or is the earth approaching the released object. Time immemorial the first has passed for knowledge: gravity. Yet the latter is correct. Galilean relative motion has the earth approaching- expanding at 16 feet per second per second constant acceleration (d=1/2at^2 part of the gravity equation)- the released object. The 4 ‘ fundamental forces’ along with epicycles put on the shelf 20 years ago. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon.
when you guys can create a robert that can take a dump ,go for a slash ,,have pie and mash with jellied eels and know the difference through experience from fish and chips ,then have it dream about it and know it is dreaming specifically about it then that will be closer to truth
Could be- when will reason mix with consciousness - when will be a MORE PERFECT UNION! ONE HUMAN-KIND? ALL ON THIS SPACE SHIP EARTH ON THE JOURNEY TO THE GREATER BECOMING for this is not “ MADE IN THE IMAGE” PURPOSE; IF we accept this UNIVERSE is a masterpiece , why would the great artist have death as end? We are so ignorant ! We love WILCZEK- CHROMO -DYNAMIC QUANTUM , DIVINE MIND!
@Neil agree- solution-dissolution Appear- disappear, matter- no matter, particle-wave, solid- ether ; ALL IS BRAHMAN Like frank said “ GOD IS A WORK IN PROGRESS “ i guess we are also , death as dress down then dress up.
When I read the words of Jesus while defining God as causality and Heaven as Utopia, I concluded that the Son of Causality was a determinist and Utopian.
Is Awareness at the Source, is “God” the name for AWARENESS itself, only thing Omnipresent, Omniscient, Omnipotent? 3 Personalities of Awareness are (Presence, Awareness, & Memory) . If Awareness is Omnipresent, you are looking through it right NOW, if it is Omniscient, All knowledge is accessed through it, if Awareness is omnipotent, IT alone determines your next step ..........
do you think the physicist .cosmologists,biologists, computer scientists that are physicalists blatant hard nose atheists and militant materalists accept any of that ?
each of us are part’s of universes, and all of us, including, all the universes, together will be a God , another words can we find anything more powerful than the combination’s above ! even any religion, saying that, we’re all pieces of God’s, !!!!
We all crystals iam the red crystal and someone the green ranger blue ranger yellow ranger and broke clock A better tomorrow climate changes on the way we are going save the planet lol
for harnessing the power of sciences to explore the deepest questions of the universe ! the apes are good at big words ! this irrational dervish did all that ! funny sick apes !
![[Part 2] Frank Wilczek on the Future of Science | Closer To Truth Chats](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/6B-ANVDFKsw/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Part 2] Frank Wilczek on the Future of Science | Closer To Truth Chats](/img/tr.png)
How humble the great ones are!
This gentle soft spoken form of life is irrefutably the universe's finest attempt to understand itself to date. What a privilege to listen him.
I watched it all. Fascinating. I could listen to him talk for even longer.
Yes, this is fantastic I really enjoy Frank's brilliance.
Another fascinating CTT conversation. Mr. Kuhn, you are brilliant, knowledgeable and have just the right temperament. You are the best at this.
I LOVE Frank Wilczek!
Me too. I feel warm and safe and challenged by his gentle brilliance.
I think he is my favorite overall guest on CTT.
We were thrilled to be able to interview him right after he won the Templeton Prize.
@@CloserToTruthTV A conscious entity capable of generating information by observing. Matter doesn't exist until we observe it . (Frank Wilczek)
The man is unbelievable! The ideas are just wonderful! I wish I could understand the world on his level. 😁
Read his books. The latest one, "Fundamentals", explains a lot of physics in a brilliant way. I knew a lot of what he discusses there but he gave me new perspectives on many things.
@@iridium1911 really ill take a look
This was a really great interview...I was glued to the screen the entire time...I appreciate you having him on your show...kudos. On a side note...you couldn't have picked a more prototypical looking guy for being a "scientist" could you....messed up hair, broken glasses that are taped up and keep falling down his nose, a pocket full of pens...I LOVE IT...this man get's it...he doesn't care what people think about him 'cuz he's too busy doing smart stuff ....again, I love it.
A conscious entity capable of generating information by observing. Matter doesn't exist until we observe it . (Frank Wilczek)
Such high quality intellect, yet so unassuming. His book " Fundamentals Ten keys to reality" is ,like this interview, beyond fascinating.
A wonderful discussion!
When smart people speak... I listen 💯
A conversation filled to the brim with ideas
Very interesting conversation.
What I like best about Robert Lawrence Kuhn is his ability to ask pertinent questions without inserting his own ego.
If you can bring other great physicists and scientists in this format, with well-segregated sections on each personality's key achievements - as you did with Frank Wilczek. That would be fantastic for us who follow your podcast regularly
I wonder what you think he has been doing?
I admire Robert’s ability to stay abreast of so many topic areas that he has relevant questions for leading edge peeps.
Yes of course he is doing it all his life - chat format with well-defined sections is what I was taking. Apologies if that didn't get conveyed
We're putting new coversheets on all the TPS reports before they go out now. So if you could go ahead and try to remember to do that from now on, that'd be great.
A big question that haunts me & I don’t have an answer to is this, if Robert can find answers to - What happens when you know all the secrets of the world? What would life look like? Would it not be better to stay naive than loose the magic of curiosity?
email him
Everything in our universe is energy, vibrating in a harmonic coherence that creates the great cosmic symphony. Physicist Dr. Theresa Bullard reveals that our power of observation determines how our reality manifests, making us players in a masterpiece of universal proportions.
also
A conscious entity capable of generating information by observing. Matter doesn't exist until we observe it . (Frank Wilczek)
Congrats to your guest. Great video. If human scientific endeavors have existed for a billionth of one percent in relation to the age of our universe, I would caution against thinking we've unraveled everything worth knowing.
K you do that.
@@cantbeserious8843 I'll just refer you to your Utube name. Bazinga!
@@wayneasiam65 A conscious entity capable of generating information by observing. Matter doesn't exist until we observe it . (Frank Wilczek)
@@dongshengdi773 so the sky isn't there until we look up?
WOW!
For me it raises the question: what standard we use to measure what. Human knowledge is finite and limited which means no real reflection from the side of scientists that how and what they are dealing with but they are creating law like expression how the world works, instead of realizing that they knowledge is only a fragment of the whole picture and should be warn sign how they use their fragmented knowledge to apply to our life.
Fascinating
But, physicists still don't understand why there are constants. Heavenly knowledge 😇
What do you mean, 'STILL don't understand'? It's a very difficult problem to work out.
What is hardest to understand is why certain humans immediately invoke "heavenly" solutions WHEN they don't understand something.
@@erlybird3122 it's you that doesn't understand, have you thought that possible?
This is so profound. Much more fascinating than supernatural opinions.
okay if you like
I love that Frank has his glasses taped up. On Lex he had six pens in his pocket. Pure nerd superman!
Do you find it odd how Lex can get interviewees on this level, but also spends valuable time on people like Rogan and J Peterson?
I’m asking because I noticed this discrepancy, but havent communicated with others who watch both programs and wondered if it was a shared observation
@@ili626 agreed
'I think what you could do, what you must do, is go to what science is to what could be if we want to think about what science is going to mean for our future" Frank Wilczek
Re: "Does that mean that 'should' is a subset of 'could'?" - just recently I was watching a video where Tony Blake had asked JG Bennett "What is the original sin?" and Bennett answered: "Not doing what you can do, and trying to do what you cannot do." - it seems to fit nicely with the should and could statement!
The "straight jacket" is the Big Bang, Lambda-CDM model.
When you translate the languages, in to English, sometimes, the meaning of your words changed , and your words and the meaning also changes as results!
Thanks
I was chucking about the comment "To me God is a work in progress". I was thinking to myself afterwards that it's ok. God feels the same way about you as well. Ha ha. A little Christian humor. Not bashing at all. It was thought of in love not out of spite or animosity.
Great conversation.
The taped glasses, the pocket protector, that's got to be his sense of humor.
A clock ⏰ has been created by us , and the time’s created by itself, and nobody knows, the size of it, and how to do it !
The rightful course for future science is staying closer to truth.
and what do you understand that Robert means by truth
@@chrisbennett6260 there are 2 types of truth:
1. Personal truth. Subjective. Each of us have a personal truth.
2. Universal Truth. Nobody knows. It is beyond human comprehension.
What Robert seeks is universal Truth but he is pragmatic enough to know it is impossible
So he aimed to get pass personal truth and get "closer" to universal Truth.
We find truth from facts. But facts alone are not enough.
Does the Nash Equilibrium only exist because our orbit provides a 50%light and a 50%darkness state? Please advise
Hello Profrssor Wilczek, once again the problems that keep alluding us has cropped up once more in your video. With respect, may I make some suggestions which may give cause for constructive cosideration.
' Dark Matter ', an incredibly small Negatively charged monopole particle, called a ' Harveytron ', that fills every available empty space in the atom and every available empty space throughout the universe, forming a cloud. The presence of this ' Harvetron cloud ', is what provides a medium in which all electromagnetic radiation and gravittional waves can propogate and travel through space.
The force exerted by these particle trying to repel each other in every direction is the ' Dark energy '.
' Dark Energy ', is the force that is causing the universe to expand. It is also one of the forces of gravity, which I believe is a force of both attraction and repulsion in an interplay between positive and negative particles.
I believe that there exists only two fundamental particles that make up everything that exists in the universe, The negatively charged monopole ' Harveytron ' particle, and a corresponding positively charged monopole called a ' Dannytron '.
In combination, these two particles make up all of the atomic nuclei, everything else are soley the negatively charged particles.
These particles may turn out to be impossible to detect at the present time, because they are so small. They are are so small that I believe that all of the particles making up the nucleus of the atom are composites of these particles. I am happy to explain more if you are interested. Kind regars Tony Marsh.
If time does not really exist, no need to worry about reversing the laws of physics.
I love the green screen of a green screen.
I would like to work on a project with the deceasing electrons. 🎇
I don’t dispute the expansion of the universe but if space has no gravity and it’s gravity that groups together all the mass out there , planets , galaxies, suns , black holes all the objects out there then as the universe expands and the distances between galaxies and stuff become larger and gravity plays less and less a part than of course the expansion would speed up but it didn’t just start from nothing.
❤
You can't tell me that the tape on his glasses and pen/pencil pocket protector are not there intentionally. No way.
I was wandering about the tape too. Reminds me of my first broken glasses when I was young and had no time and money to buy new ones 👀😂
Speed 1.75x .
A few hundred years ago, who would have believed that, by mixing stones, metals and vegetation, we would create a robot that could compute, walk and talk?
Everything in our universe is energy, vibrating in a harmonic coherence that creates the great cosmic symphony. Physicist Dr. Theresa Bullard reveals that our power of observation determines how our reality manifests, making us players in a masterpiece of universal proportions.
and
A conscious entity capable of generating information by observing. Matter doesn't exist until we observe it . (Frank Wilczek)
@@dongshengdi773 Therefore our planet is also capable of computation, movement and speech.
Frank has interesting ideas, this reminds me of a tentioned spring coming back to is origanal position when realesed because it has a memory.Our mids run clockwise so its not that intuitive to think that a partical can run anti clockwise. But quantum mechanics is not that intuitive.Does God play dice or is the universe deterministic?
Love how he has a green screen but the chair blocks the entire view
How to take a person seriously who says “this is an unusual property” about an observation of the Universe…?
Everything in the universe appear as energy and forces or beauty, all of which do not exist except for our sensual feelings of heat, touch and visual color respectively. In reality all that exist is mysterious emergent fields at all levels.
how so
Let’s talk about 50/50 chances. The released object is approaching the earth or is the earth approaching the released object. Time immemorial the first has passed for knowledge: gravity. Yet the latter is correct. Galilean relative motion has the earth approaching- expanding at 16 feet per second per second constant acceleration (d=1/2at^2 part of the gravity equation)- the released object. The 4 ‘ fundamental forces’ along with epicycles put on the shelf 20 years ago. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon.
when you guys can create a robert that can take a dump ,go for a slash ,,have pie and mash with jellied eels and know the difference through experience from fish and chips ,then have it dream about it and know it is dreaming specifically about it then that will be closer to truth
Dark matter is fundamental matters, and is also dead matter, but we should be aware of dark energies, because they still alive!
Frank's in Stockholm, explains the European windows.
The quark’s has no memory, but how they can find each other’s!
Attraction does not require the brain.
Consciousness does not require memory.
@@misterhill5598 and by consciousness what do you mean ?
@@chrisbennett6260 a fundamental part of life.
If there are building blocks of life, consciousness would be one of them.
Two dimensional materials? Somebody care to explain that one?
A möbius strip.
Most important Truisms of the night:
"..It was a gift from GOD.."
Could be- when will reason mix with consciousness - when will be a MORE PERFECT UNION! ONE HUMAN-KIND? ALL ON THIS SPACE SHIP EARTH ON THE JOURNEY TO THE GREATER BECOMING for this is not “ MADE IN THE IMAGE”
PURPOSE; IF we accept this UNIVERSE is a masterpiece , why would the great artist have death as end?
We are so ignorant !
We love WILCZEK- CHROMO -DYNAMIC QUANTUM , DIVINE MIND!
@Neil agree- solution-dissolution
Appear- disappear, matter- no matter, particle-wave, solid- ether ; ALL IS BRAHMAN
Like frank said “ GOD IS A WORK IN PROGRESS “ i guess we are also , death as dress down then dress up.
When I read the words of Jesus while defining God as causality and Heaven as Utopia, I concluded that the Son of Causality was a determinist and Utopian.
Is Awareness at the Source, is “God” the name for AWARENESS itself, only thing Omnipresent, Omniscient, Omnipotent? 3 Personalities of Awareness are (Presence, Awareness, & Memory) . If Awareness is Omnipresent, you are looking through it right NOW, if it is Omniscient, All knowledge is accessed through it, if Awareness is omnipotent, IT alone determines your next step ..........
do you think the physicist .cosmologists,biologists, computer scientists that are physicalists blatant hard nose atheists and militant materalists accept any of that ?
each of us are part’s of universes, and all of us, including, all the universes, together will be a God , another words can we find anything more powerful than the combination’s above ! even any religion, saying that, we’re all pieces of God’s, !!!!
my man set up his green screen for nothing
The self giggling Nobel Prize Laureate - lucky man
the curse ! dragged mankind back at least one thousand year ! the curse talks about science !
Just stop ignoring evidence.
This life is a prison hell the proof is literally everywhere
Diogenes may agree with you.
We all crystals iam the red crystal and someone the green ranger blue ranger yellow ranger and broke clock A better tomorrow climate changes on the way we are going save the planet lol
the dervish who wears the cloak of science ! it is the planet of the apes no doubt.
for harnessing the power of sciences to explore the deepest questions of the universe ! the apes are good at big words !
this irrational dervish did all that ! funny sick apes !
the introduction is so funny (real apes)
they make lies then believe them ! I am about to believe the apes' hallucinations.
so funny apes !
the only thing the thief apes can do is (theft)
real apes !
this is a very simple man wearing the cloak of science, it is a heavy burden on the clown !