Awesome lesson! Very clear. It's really important a right translation from Hebrew to modern languages. Thank you so much for your work. God bless you! Shabbat Shalom.
YHVH chose the Hebrew LANGUAGE & the Hebrew speaking people to give his words of His Torah/instructions. Because He also chose this Hebrew nation of peoples to Deliver His only begotten son. Everything of Torah points to His Son Yahshua. Those who incorrectly Translated His Torah to confuse the world will be judged harshly, if He hasn't already been judged. Thank you for this study
@@Leolioness44 Ever heard that Jesus was in the beginning? Here’s the hidden mathematical breakdown: Jesus(Greek)=888 733rd composite is 888 1068 is the 888th composite 733+1068=1801 1801-888=913 913=bereshit (Hebrew) Bereshit is the first word of Genesis. In fact, in Judaism the Book of Genesis as a whole is referred to as Bereshit! Jesus is “in the beginning” (In the beginning is 3 words and 14 letters; It’s all just a slice of π)
@@andreitone there is a word for each sentence, we cant take one word and apply it to past present and future tense.just like any other language,it wouldn't make sense to say in english i am for i was nor i iwas for i will be, so in hebrew or aramai would be the same.
I love these but could you slow down a little while we try to read the Hebrew with you to learn . I love Hebrew and am trying to learn from these . Thank you for using the biblical Hebrew.
i will be who i will be, there is a verse in the tanach that right now i dont have the citation for i am at work, it says i will conduct my self with you as you conduct yourself with me. "ehyeh asher ehyeh"
@@netzayorkn9037 Tehillim 18.27 (Psalm 18.26) עִם־נָבָר תִּתְבָּרָר וְעִם־עִקֵּשׁ תִּתְפַּתָּל׃ With the pure thou dost shew thyself pure; and with the perverse thou dost shew thyself contrary.
@@TheHebrewBible previous to this ehyeh asher ehyeh when moshe said to hashem here yiu send me to the children of israel and they will not believe me,who should i tell them send me? hashem answered, to your for fathers i did not revealed my name. i manifested my self to them as el shadai, but not as yud he vav he.this is my name to be remembered,any ehyeh asher ehyeh, thell them ehyeh asher ehyeh sent me, because el shadai acts accordingly to the conduct of the people or person. while yud he vav he is the attribute of mercy, here we already can understand why hashem told mosheh tell them ehyeh asher ehyeh sent me
Shalom brother :) This is my 2nd year studying Hebrew - I am an independent student of scripture and of Hebrew . I have found that (for me) fundamental to learning a language is understanding grammar- and it is more complex than verb subject object sentence structure - thank you for taking the time to share your research and your knowledge with others - HIS יהוה Word Yeshua is the bread of life ❤- May ABBA bless you and keep you shalom to you shalom to Jerusalem ❤
Also there is a gentleman Dr(?) Henry Smith with ABR (Associates for Biblical Research) who is working on his doctorate on Gen 5 and Gen 11 (fascinating area of research imo) who has a lot of information on the multiple transcripts (if you’re not already aware of)
A group of 70 individuals was commissioned to translate the Hebrew Bible. Meaning they translated the Septuagint individually, and then the project was brought together for comparison. Who makes better translators than Hebrew Scholars / scribes? Indeed, they were Israelite translators. I put my trust in that they knew exactly what they were doing, and no way would they blaspheme the Name of God.
@@IanTanLK commissioned by who? In Exodus 3.12, the Hebrew word “Ehyeh” is translated in the Septuagint as ἔσομαι (esomai), which means “I will be”. It’s a future tense, active indicative of εἰμί (eimi). Why didn’t they translate it the same way in verse 14? The story of 70 translators is a legend.
א ה י ה א ש ר א ה י ה I am Yah, I rule, I am Yah “This is My Name forever” You’re looking for the NAME of a El, not a description (I will be what I will be).
I only recently subbed, and started watching your videos, so i've only seen a few. That said, were you saying the "hebrew" connotation of the divine name (tetra.) repudiates the notion of the "trinity"?
@@anonymouscosmonaut pls check out the following videos. ua-cam.com/video/-liGhbdTGtM/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/dnO_XZpPuGo/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/6WKaQ0zu8aQ/v-deo.html
Finally, it is refreshing to see a presentation by someone knowledgeable about the Word of God. I do not know why so much time is spent looking at the greek, since it is incapable of rendering the message of the Hebrew texts. Hebrew is the godly language spoken in heaven, and predates creation itself. Greek is just a shallow pagan language that has no spiritual value whatsoever. It is just a translation which is very limited because of the shortcomings of the language itself. As such it is not where the Truth can be found. As far as english goes there is not one correct translation in the over 900 different translations and versions in existence today. I personally do not even look at the greek since it is undependable anyway and a total waste of time. Considering it is what Rome claims is the original NT text is enough for me to disregard it altogether, since the vatican is built on lies and false pretentions. God's chosen people has always been and will continue to be Israel.
What is the relationship of this with when Jesus said "before Abraham was,I am" ? Because we see after saying that, the people wanted to stone him. Can we say it was a wrong translation also? I would like to hear from you
@@mujinya-il4lr he existed before Avraham. If you look at the rest of that passage, he says I am multiple times. It’s only when he says he was before Avraham that they got upset. So it’s not that he was saying he is the Father, it was him saying that he supersedes Avraham, which they equate to the Torah because it was given to them again, only this time in writing. He gave such instruction that they couldn’t say they didn’t know or understand. They could not deny that they understood the covenant parameters that they were agreeing to. It is a contract.
@TheHebrewBible But you can still bring not what it is saying to what it is not like you did with I AM vs I WILL. In English, it says that Leah's eye was weak, and is that true according to Hebrew
If I mayhap suggest the following; 1) Greens, Interlinear Hebrew, Greek, English Bible with Strong’s numbers. And One of Strong’s several choices of Concordance’s. With the Hebrew, Greek dictionary’s. 2) The Scriptures by the Institute for Scripture Research ( ISR). South Africa. I have found that each of these to be a actual near literal word for word translation with a modicum of religious dogma, tradition, and custom. To muddy the waters of the truth of the Father’s Word. However, if your a King James only fan? You may find yourself disappointed? As the two recommendations above have lacking old addendum’s. Especially The Scriptures ( ISR ). As it does not have the following; 1) Mark 7:19. As it was originally a side bar note by an Irish monk from around 1430, that was added into the KJV’s translation from the 1611 addition onwards. And only corrected in the latest additions of the New KJV. Also the word Easter has been restored to the original “ Passover/ Pasach. In Acts 12:4. As well as the Addendum added by Erasmus’s translation of his third addition in 1523 under pressure from the then Protestants as one of their most cherished traditional passages taken from the Catholic’s Latin Vulgate. First added in circa 8th to 9th centuries AD. But not to be found in any Greek manuscripts before that time, the 16th century. This being the now well known, Johnnie Comma, as follows; 1John 5:7&8. You will also find the the title Lord, LORD and God have been removed and restored back to the Hebrew names. From the Book titles to the name of the character’s who lived, and/ or wrote the Scriptures as the Spirit moved them. And The name of the Father has been restored some 6,827 times back into the Hebrew letters. As well as the name of the Son, our Messiah. I have found these books to have been of the greatest of value to me in my research and study while comparing them with my collection of another 42 Bible’s and New Testament’s. And though I would have to recommend three other Bible’s to obtain a complete Bible in itself. What I have listed will, I believe give you an excellent starting point to the fullness of the light given us by the inspiration from on high. I found and purchased them on EBay. As EBay gives you better description’s of intended prospective purchase’s. Over the other competitors. I pray that this has been of some use to you? Blessings on your journey to the Father’s truth and love for us through His Son. Shalom friend
Everything you mention in the video is very good, however, I consider that in the Greek version, the concept is well represented, since the idea of God's transcendentality is expressed with the active participle of the verb. If we take into account that the translators were pious Jews, who knew the idea well in the original Hebrew I believe that
I'd offer "Ahayah Ashar Ahayah" can also mean "I be that, STRAIGHT, that I be." which is directly attached to Yshar'Al (ישראל) "To do YaH's Straightness" As HE is Straight "Unchanging" and and we are called to do His Straightness upon the Earth. Mashali/Proverbs 3:5-8 🔥💙👐🏽❤️🔥 Blessings!
Thank you Mr. Gumadi for a well explained presentation. May I suggest though if you could look into, among all other English translations, the New World Translation. For years this translation have followed closely many of your explanations. It's not as widely known as the KJV but I think you'll find it quite useful and interesting.
Honestly, I don't know why you all are fussing about this. There is no theological difference between "I AM", "I WILL BE", and "I WAS". They all pass the same theological message.
Dear friend, The implications of this video and it’s teaching are of paramount importance. As the, I am statement is taught that it is proof that the Son is the Father. In essence, two of the three persons of the Trinity? With the Holy Spirit being the third. Even though the Son showed us that the Father is Spirit. And we are to worship HIM in spirit and in truth. And without the, I am claim having validity? The Trinitarian teaching falls apart on that point. In conjunction with the two profound addendum‘s of Matthew 28:19 and 1John 5:7&8. The Trinitarian dogma looses its foundation to the point that, we as students of the Scriptures might begin to view the Scriptures themselves with new eyes. And begin to wonder about the meaning of the Seven Spirit’s of the Most High as found in four places in the book of Revelation and in Isaiah 11:2. And come to realize that man is but a foolish child to dare to think that they could possibly put the Almighty into a box. A mere thing to be measured? Thus man making for himself gods which are no gods! And adding to the Father’s word, thus proving themselves to be lier’s. As it is written. That is why this understanding of the original Biblical Hebrew is of import. Now, I pray you. Read Proverbs 30:4-6. And pray that your eyes will be opened. For these verses have been given through the prophet by the hand of the Father. Search the Scriptures and see if these things are so? Blessings and Shalom to you friend
@ I see you totally misunderstood my comment. I know that original Hebrew is important. That is not my issue. In fact, even if the Greek translation is I AM, we must look again at the message being passed for example in John's gospel, the people wanted to stone him for making reference to himself as deity. This scripture just proves that using the translation I AM is equivalent to I WILL BE since the Jews understood that He was pointing to Abraham in Genesis and I WILL BE in Exodus even though it uses the I AM translation rather than I WILL BE. What matters is the context and communication. The point of my comment is that whether you use I AM or I WILL BE, you end up with the same theological statement or meaning, so no information is lost. In fact, we trinitarians do use both and acknowledge both. In reference to trinity in your second paragraph, you misrepresent trinitarianism by saying "Son is the Father" which is heresy to trinitarianism. I don't know if you are refuting trinitarianism, but if you are, better educate yourself on what it really is else you are refuting a straw man. There are many sources on YT for example, Dr. Michael Brown, InspiringPhilosophy, Reasonablefaith.org, Sam Shamoun... especially with the evidence in Jewish scripture (I don't and won't engage this topic here because it is too vast for a comment). Again, I want to pass across the idea that there is no symbolic or even theological difference between I AM and I WILL BE. If there were things that depended on the original Hebrew translation to make sense, this is not one. The distinction between I AM and I WILL BE does not affect trinity in any theological sense. Lasltly, there was no need for you to make the recommendation of proverbs 30:4-6 because it doesn't have nothing to do with my comment or the importance of original translation or the distinction between I AM and I WILL BE.
The “I am “ issue is in fact a Trinitarian issue by the claimed statements that you desired to engaged your dialogue. And yet made claims to my lack of knowledge and understanding? Even making claim to the status of my mental health? As well as a couple of other issues that you had with my comments? Not very helpful towards healthy discourse? Okay friend please give me, if you will any scriptures that teach the Trinity or even mention the word Trinity? Or the teaching thereof, of said doctrine from the Scriptures? I pointed out Proverbs 30:4-6 to show you that the Father is the Father and that the Son is in fact the Son of the Father. And that according to the very word of the Father. It’s something that can be googled in short order and read in about the same amount of time. As for myself? I didn’t come to my conclusions lightly. But through much research and study. And after restoring those things taken from the word of the Most High. And removing those things that were added to the the word of the Scriptures by the hand of men and devils and not there by and through the hand of the Father. My eyes have been opened to a Good News that reads harmoniously between the TaNaK/ Old Testament and the Breit haDasha/ Second Writings/ New Testament. And through this I have come to the conclusion that Yahshua haMashiach/ Jesus the Christ is exactly who He announced Himself to Be and who He announced the Father and Sovereign of all that exists, seen and unseen. Who gives us our every day and every breath and heartbeat and division of cell! Who commands us to walk out HIS Torah/ instruction, to guard and do all that HE has given us through HIS loving commitment and unwarranted mercy and favor. Which are those things that HIS Son gave us to do! For as the Son said; I only say those things that I hear My Father in heaven saying. And only do those things that I see My Father in heaven doing. Just as He said; The Father is greater than I. And witnessed to His Talmedim/ taught ones/ disciples in Matthew 28:18 ; All authority has been given unto Me in heaven and on earth. As it was the Father who gave Him His authority! As the Messiah proclaimed: That He was the only begotten Son of the Father who proceeded forth from beside the Father. And the Son instructed us to worship the Father only and to believe in the One in whom the Father sent… Himself, the Son. We follow the Torah/ Instruction of the Father and through the Son. Not because by doing so do we gain favor nor do our own works account for righteousness… But we do so as a sign, that we are children of the Father and a friend to HIS Son. Now we know that the Father is Spirit and that we are to worship the Father in spirit and in truth. And we know from Isaiah 11:2 and as found in four places in Revelations, the Seven Spirit’s of Elohim/ Mightiest, the Father. That the Almighty is far beyond what we mere humans can possibly comprehend and/or put into a box. Little own a Trinity. The mere wellsprung massenations of Tertrullian and those completely alien to the understanding and practice of the original first generation of called out believers of the Way of the Natzri. For the hidden things belong to the Almighty. But those things that HE has disclosed to us? Belong to us and to our children and our childrens children forever. The Father has warned us; MY people perish for lack of knowledge. For they have turned away from MY Torah, and have forgotten My set-apart name. And the Messiah has warned; get away from Me you worker’s of lawlessness. How is it that we could possibly be lawless if we are no longer under the Torah? That said, I must wonder if their are any who actually read, slowly and deliberately what it is that I write, as I attempt to encourage each to dialogue and debate every issue in detailed and researched point? To the ends of we both helping one another towards a better and more precise understanding of the Scriptures and of the truth. Not my truth but that which comes from above. But to merely discount another’s point of understanding without a point by point, verse by verse and the demeaning childish name calling points towards a hardness of heart and lack of knowledge of the word of the Most High? So friend please take the time to engage beyond the pale canned response. And share, if you would. Blessings and Shalom friend
@@thomaspayne3347 Again you missed the point, my comment was never about trinity. The reason why I did not suffer to read from the second paragraph is that you still misunderstand my comment, therefore, you have written a whole lot of unnecessary stuff I just glazed over, moreover you say I make claims about your mental health which is false. I said you should educate yourself on the trinity doctrine because you committed the most basic heresy against it. I did not even say you lack knowledge and understanding but that you misunderstood my comment, those are two different things. I already told you I will not engage the matter of trinity in a comment, but seems you didn't bother to read that part. In fact, I gave you sources where you could better see the arguments for trinity, but no! You will just repeat the most basic and weakest argument against trinity such as: "show me where the word trinity is mentioned" argument. Please go educate yourself on what the trinity doctrine is. There is a plethora of evidence for trinity especially from the Jewish scriptures. I will repeat that my issue is not about trinity, but that the meaning of I AM is the same with I WILL BE but it seems you are so interested in making it about trinity. If while reading a small comment of mine, you fail to understand some point I clearly made and repeatedly make the issue about something it is not, then what about reading the scripture which is far more difficult than this comment? I tell you! Many become too confident and arrogant in their opinion that they miss out on what the facts are and what God is telling/showing them. Don't be like that. For a fact, you do not understand the scriptures if you refute such a basic truth about Jesus' deity. !!!I WILL NOT ENGAGE WITH YOU ANYMORE!!!
Very thorough and scholarly analysis. Seems the name, is the ultimate declaration of Liberty. "I Will Be Whatever I Want To Be", in English. That must be why Wisdom is ever at His Right Hand. He will always need Her! HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA Bless
The phrases "I AM THAT I AM" (Hebrew: אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה), "I will be what I will be," and "I AM THAT WHICH I AM" all have similar meanings. They express the idea of self-existence and highlight God's eternal and unchanging nature. Although the wording varies, the main message about identity and existence is the same in each interpretation. 🤦♂️
The phrase that is commonly translated "I AM THAT I AM" (Hebrew: אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה), which can be interpreted in various ways, including "I will be what I will be" and "I AM THAT WHICH I AM." Each of these interpretations is valid. I personally agree with Robert Young's translation, but I recognize that other translations are also acceptable. Ultimately, none of these interpretations are incorrect; they reflect the preferences and perspectives of the translators. ~Shalom
THE SEPTUAGINT TRANSLATE THE HOLY NAME BY Ο ΩΝ MEANING THAT GOD WAS IS WILL BE THE ABSOLUTE ESSENCE OR EXISTENCE THE ETERNAL BEING AND AFTER AS THE HEBREW TEXT THEY TRANSLATE BY Ο ΚΥΡΙΟΣ ADONAI...CONGRATULATIONS FOR YOUR WORK...
This is definitely a relativistic opinion. None of the "oldest and best" Hebrew manuscripts have vowel markings. That's a fairly recent addition, by people "trying to help" because apparently God has no idea what He's doing.
The added word the scribes put in that sentence is why no one can figure out the meaning, this word "that" wasn't in the original, I am has two meanings, one is present tense, the other is future tense, God gave Moses no name, He simply told Moses to tell them He would come to them or Tell them I am coming, this is the origins of their promise that their Savior would come or appear to them, the problem is that He's already come, His name is Jesus
In response to the question, “Who shall I say did send me?”; the Holy Spirit said to Moishe, “I am who I am.” He has many names representing his relationship with mankind. All of those “Jehovah names” added together equal the “name above all other” names, Yeshua (Savior).
Ho on means "the being" or "the existence without which there is no existence." This is how God defined Himself, but in that encounter specifically, God stated His Name to Moses when He spoke to him from the tree. Allah
Shalom! Thoda. This is Amazing. A great lesson and teachings. I just prayed for a good and true teacher! In the NT new testament bible is the book of Hebrews? What does the word Hebrew mean? Also , A spiritual and a good person sain that the NT books and letters were written in the Hebrew Language not in Greek??? What is your comments? 'Yaway- said "I will be What I will be" Sorry for the spelling, i am catching the inspiration to. Write and make a comment. Slán. Amen 🙏
The word "Hebrew" in Hebrew is first in the Torah referring to Avraham, and it means "To traverse, from one side to the other side" . Avraham was called a Hebrew because he went from the side of paganism in Babylonian, and traversed to the side of absolute Monotheism and was sent to the promise land. . There is no solid scholarly evidence that the NT was originally written in Hebrew. Besides, most the concepts in the NT are very Greek minded as well. That's Even more evidence that they are the formulation of a Hellenistic greek world, and not that of the Hebrew. When you have a document written in Greek, and you have the information in that document promoting Greek thinking and ideas, then its easy to assume its a Hellenestic Greek work, and not a Jewish Hebraic one.
@gayleagibson5228 Thanks. Some if not all of the NT was written originally in Hebrew, perhaps, but as translated in Greek? Perhaps? The spoken language was Armenian? But! The reference point was the Torah law, The spoken word and the Written Word. Thanks we first translation is Greek. Perhaps? I need more time to explain Why I am thinking like this? I read about it somewhere. Comment please. Thanks 👍
"I will be with thee" was a reassurance because Moses was afraid that Pharaoh was going to kill him because he killed one of the egyptians. It does not mean that God was NOT with Moses before. God is with everyone of His servants, all the time.
Greek is not relevant because Hebrew expresses thought and is the original language. The root in Hebrew is haya הָיָה which means to be and to exist and life. Yahuah is the past, present and future which implies to self-exist. This is alluded to in Ecclesiastes 3:15 which refers to time: that which hath been is now; and that which is to be hath already been and Yahuah requireth that which is past. Yahuah is time and exists outside time as he is eternity. Man cannot self-exist. Yahuah is knew everyone before they are born, however, he will not be friends with all that are born. Yahuah knowing everyone before they are born is mutually exclusive to him being with his chosen vessels.
Proverbs 8:27 The 1st thing God did was “draw a circle “ It’s all about a circle and Pi. SHEMOT (names) 3:14 is where God gave his name to Moses. I have found the mathematics that support PI as self-existent. I can explain the mystery of 1000 days as 1, why it is said God is ONE (Echad), and other curious biblical numbers. I can explain why numbers are arranged in the way they are in Pi. Moses= 345 and Eyheh Asher Eyheh = 543 Sum : 888 Jesus in Greek = 888
It relates in that Jesus is claiming that God is his authority.. Thus Jesus tells them "Before Abraham was God was", but Jesus gives them the poetic short for God's name י ה . . Jesus is clearly not referring to himself as "I Am", he is pointing to the one through whom Jesus claims to have authority from. of course this is likely a fabricated story anyhow. But in context that is what the author of John is referring to.
Becomong- Capasity-Holiness-the Righteousness to do and be Good. A baot has a capasity to hold the fish, and the fishermen, the net has a capasity to catch fish, when it is in let down in the right water, not drying on a Rock. The Greeks translators perhaps lack the capasity to understand the Hebrew concept of the One Lord, and the God Family, because of the Idolatary and poly dieties and herious and Pagan Gods, they put the head of ther Gods their champions, their heros on their money, they perhaps did not undestans the one Law and the one Being mentiones in the Torah . Or- light! they were, we are our own wordt teachers. That is why we need a great and the Good Shepard to lead us! Psalms 23:1- The Lord- Yah way is my Savour and my Salom!!! Salvation. Who is your Salvation and your Savour??? Amen!!! Slán.
According to the Strong’s, Mounce, Young’s, and Brig’s Hebrew/ Greek/ English dictionary’s it translates to; “ I Exist that I Exist “ As in Self Existence! And after reading all of the other possibilities of the fraze? As well as word for word? I found no reference at all for an- I am, statement? What it does not mean is; “ I am that I am “ To the best of my knowledge. Our Messiah clearly declares; That the Father is greater than I. And In Matthew 28:18 states; All authority has been given unto Me in heaven and on earth. This He said after He had risen, witnessed to over 500 persons. And just before His Ascension. He also said: The Father is Spirit, and we are to worship HIM in spirit and in truth. The Messiah instructed us to worship the Father only. And The believe in the One in whom the Father sent. To believe in His name. believe/ Trust. And That is why we are to pray to the Father and to ask in the name of HIS Son. Matthew 28:19 has been proven to be an addendum. And the proof of this fact is made through the seven witnesses. Beginning with Acts 2:38 and ending with Galatians 3:27. With five of those witnesses found in the book of Acts, and the sixth found in Romans. All seven witnesses/ verses agree. For there is no other name under heaven by which we shall be saved. And that name is Jesus the Christ/ Yahshua haMashiach! Also the other said witness of, 1John 5:7 & 8. Also has proven to be another addendum. Known as the Johonnie Comma. This addendum cannot be found in any Greek manuscripts before the 16th century. Nor in any Latin, Hebrew, Aramaic, or Syriac manuscripts before the 8th century. What all this appears to mean to the best of my reason and research is; That the Father is the Spirit and Almighty Sovereign of all that exists, seen and unseen. And HIS Son is HIS only begotten Son who proceeded forth from beside the Father. And sits at the right hand of Power. Just as it is written. I truly appreciate your instruction and knowledge on this most important subject and helping people like myself, who are in search of the truth. Not my truth, but that which comes from the word of the Father in the language that HE selected for HIS children to pass on to those who seek HIM. And put our hope in and for the better promise given through HIS Son. The Father’s word made flesh and a ransom for many. Baruk habah bashem Yah!/ Blessed is He who is coming in the name of Yah! Blessings dear friend Shalom Shalom
I assume this is not a Christian video, but let me add an affirmation to this, that Hashem would become in some sense what he was not before. Maybe we should say that he would take on something to his being that he hadn't had before, for in his essence he changes not. In the New Testament , in the gospel of John, Jesus refers multiple times to being I am. In short summary, in the Tanach, God will become the God-man in the future. Prior to the incarnation he shall be still awaiting to become what he shall be. Upon the incarnation he can then say I am because there is no more becoming that Will occur in God.
IAM That is, IAM That was, IAM that I will be. Or, He who was, who is, and who is to come . That's the meaning of His name. Exo 3.14 Exo 3.15 He gives His name. King James translators hid God's name with capital LORD. Almost 7,000 times His name appears as LORD in the o.t. Strong's word number H3068 יְהֹוָה YHVH YeHoVaH/JEHOVAH
26:16 when He says “tell them Ehyeh sent you” why is that not Him giving His name? It’s like telling someone “tell them Mary sent you” and you’ll get a good deal.
Your missing an important concept.. God does not have a literal name. He has 70 attributes. we say He has 70 names (as those names/attributes are recorded in Torah) but those are all associated with attributes. you can't 'name' God. Something that has a name means that something is 'owned'. . After a Jew learns the 70 names of God, he can then go on to learn the 600,000 names of God. But this requires memorizing the whole Torah. The video explains that what's being given here to Moses is an attribute, NOT a personal name.
@@ShemaHaTorah not sure if you missed the “hidden in your Bible” concept: It’s all just a slice of Pi Learn gematria Proverbs 8:27 The 1st thing God did was “draw a circle “ It’s all about a circle and Pi. SHEMOT (names) 3:14 is where God gave his name to Moses. I have found the mathematics that support PI as self-existent. I can explain the mystery of 1000 days as 1, why it is said God is ONE (Echad), and other curious biblical numbers. I can explain why numbers are arranged in the way they are in Pi. Moses= 345 and Eyheh Asher Eyheh = 543 Sum : 888 Jesus in Greek = 888
Don't forget Exodus 3:15 where God actually made His ETERNAL NAME known. E x odus 3:15 Y L T98 [15] And God saith again unto Moses, ‘Thus dost thou say unto the sons of Israel, J ehovah, G od of your fathers, G od of Abraham, G od of Isaac, and G od of Jacob, hath sent me unto you; this [is] My name - to the age, and this My memorial, to generation - generation. Verse 14 show the meaning of His name, He who was, is and will be thus eternal.
@@andrevisser7542 this is what the Father showed me. This has been my understanding now for 3 years. v13-Moses asked for 1-His name and 2-what should he tell the people V14 He gave His name - Ehyeh V15 He gave his memorial At the end of v15, He sums up His answer to Moses’ questions: (1) this is my name (first statement -v14) forever, and (2) this is how I am to be remembered in every generation (the Elohai of Avraham, Isaac, and Jacob). I’ve heard and read many scholars saying that the YHWH is a different tense of Ehyeh. They say YHWH has the same meaning as Ehyeh - the only self-existent one- but is a different tense of that word. They say the Father says I am, but when we speak of his name it would be He is. Which doesn’t seem quite right either for a name. Because if someone asks me my name, I say Mary. If they repeat my name in conversation, they do not say it in a different “tense”. Would you say to me, hey Mary? Or would you say hey, she who is Mary? Or hey, the Mary ? This is where the tense theory doesn’t sit quite right with me. Some people pronounce His name differently , more like Ahiah from the Aramaic Lamsa bible. Some people spell it a little differently as in Ahayah. Just as there are quite a few ways people pronounce the Messiah’s name- same name, same spelling, different pronunciation. We could all be wrong. But this is where the Father lead me and is my understanding at this time.
I do not agree. The justification for the proper rendering being I will be is that the Hebrew form is the imperfect, but the imperfect does not have anything close to 100% correspondence to the future tense. I Am is the superior rendering. The Father has always existed, does exist and will always exist. He is being, existence, the Supreme Being. Ehyeh can be Will Be, but there is no necessity to rendering it that way. So, given the reality that The Creator is always existent, rendering the word as future alone is taking away from the text, a terrible sin. Saying that Ehyeh is used to represent the future tense elsewhere is disingenuous. Many, many Hebrew words are used one way in one context and another way in another context and the imperfect tense is appropriately rendered as past or present tense in so many instances.
Either way it's rendered, when the Hebrew is rendered into another language it loses some meaning. The best we can do is employ a rendering that gives the most complete picture of what is being expressed in the Hebrew text. The core of the difficulty is that in English, we view the word Being as static, but Being is a participle, which indicates that it's an active thing. To my mind, it includes the idea of becoming. Anything being is becoming. So, overall the best rendition does not exclude the fact that Yahweh was and is, which is the common sense understanding of I will be. The best rendition is I Am Who I Am, because it includes the full reality of who the El is. I get your point that Ehyeh is elsewhere indicating a future reality, but in this case Being, if understood as an active principle, better brings across the fullness of the meaning. When something is actively Being, it is becoming, so Being says it all, while becoming only speaks of the future. Shalom to you.
Thank you for this clarification! I Am that I Am never made any sense. When Moses asked His Name, the response was I will Be What I Will Be! I studied Hebrew but have stopped because of ambiguity. When I arrived at the Binyan Verbs I stopped. Even many Jewish people do not understand this.
If I may ask, what is your personal theology? Jewish, Christian? Denomination, if any? I ask because your rejection of the Septuagint is at odds with just about every Christian scholar I've ever heard.
The LXX we now have is from 300-400 AD. There are hardly a handful of fragments from BC, which incidentally had the Tetragram in some form, not Kyrios. In my experience, generally Christian scholars (mostly Western) are biased towards Greek/ Western against Hebraic / Jewish / Eastern thought. And Greek supremacy is incimpatible with the Tanakh (cf Zech 9:13; Dan 10:20). It's a civilisational and ideological issue. My personal theology has evolved. I began as a fundamentalist Christian (Evangelical, Open Brethren). Over the course I embraced hyper-dispensationalism (post-Acts), based on the differences within the NT and recognising the need to take the Hebrew prophets at their word. At the moment you can say I embrace Jewish theology, though I am not a Jew. Bottomline, I am failful to YHVH, and accept NT where it agrees with the Tanakh. Otherwise I ignore it.
All well and good, But even the demons know the name of God. But you ought to be sure to love the Lord your God, to know Him and be known by Him, and to love your neighbor as yourself. To not just know Him by name, but to do the will of your Father in heaven, then you will be sons and daughters of Him. Repent of your own ways and trust in the Lord Jesus, be reconciled to this God of whom you scratch your head about His name.
Well, here’s what this God has said. “Look unto ME (** to YHVH **), and be ye SAVED, all the ends of the earth: for I am God, and THERE IS NONE ELSE. I have sworn by myself, the word is gone out of my mouth in righteousness, and shall not return, That UNTO ME EVERY KNEE SHALL BOW, EVERY TONGUE SHALL SWEAR (** it does NOT say to Jesus **). Surely, shall one say, in YHVH have I righteousness and strength: even to him shall men come; and all that are incensed against him shall be ashamed. In YHVH shall ALL THE SEED OF ISRAEL be JUSTIFIED, and shall glory.” Yeshayahu (Isaiah) 45.22-25.
It's sad you trying to translate his name but the name of God has no translation.. think about it it's the same in the original Hebrew and in English to pronounce it use the ancient Hebrew in English u cannot translate the name of God is confusing his name is the same for all generations don't listen to this devil he knows nothing he's making up words so you understand smh
"But He CAN BE what He had NOT BEEN" Thanks for that, Yehovah (He who was, is and will be) said He is the only God and the only saviour (yeshua in Hebrew) then He *manifested* as Yehoshua (Yehovah-saviour) to do exactly that. Yehovah also became Yehoshua of the world...
@@andrevisser7542 Isaiah 12-2 does say that Hashem will become ישועה (yeshua), which means salvation, not a person. Notice the letter ה at the end of the word, it’s feminine. The word for saviour is מוֹשִׁיעַ (moshia), and in Isaiah 43:11; 45:21 and Hosea 13:4, it is written Hashem is the only Saviour, none else. In Psalm 146:3, the Israelites were told not to put trust in the “son of man”, because there is no תְשׁוּעָה (teshuah, salvation) in him. So whilst He can be what He had not been, He will be what HE will be, not what we think He should be.
This all becomes much more clear when we understand the concept that ONLY HaShem exists. Everything else is either an emanation or a transient blip of energy. Nothing else really exists, its all an illusion of transient energy and forms. HaShem is the 'Existing one', he is all that that there is. HaShem Echad. That's why he tells Moses "I am The Existing One", I am being itself.
𝗜 𝗔𝗺 𝗪𝗵𝗼 𝗜 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗯𝗲. The God of Israel .. ? My God Your God ? depends on where your heart is. No matter t𝗵𝗲 𝗢𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝘀 𝗠𝘁𝘁 𝟐𝟐:𝟑𝟕-𝟒𝟎 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. 𝗠𝘁𝘁 𝟏𝟐: 𝟑𝟎 Jn 6:29 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗼𝗳 𝗚𝗼𝗱, 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘆𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗵𝗶𝗺 𝘄𝗵𝗼𝗺 𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝘁𝗵 𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁.
This is why i like hearing the hebraic perspective. It adds so much more depth to God's word. Thank you!
Awesome lesson! Very clear. It's really important a right translation from Hebrew to modern languages. Thank you so much for your work. God bless you! Shabbat Shalom.
Thank you for this detailed teaching! You've answered questions I've been struggling with for a long time.
you are a good teacher moses
thank you
The Hebrew mindset is the key.....thank you so much for the explanation.....
The key is Pi
2071@@justasliceofpi
YHVH chose the Hebrew LANGUAGE & the Hebrew speaking people to give his words of His Torah/instructions. Because He also chose this Hebrew nation of peoples to Deliver His only begotten son. Everything of Torah points to His Son Yahshua.
Those who incorrectly Translated His Torah to confuse the world will be judged harshly, if He hasn't already been judged.
Thank you for this study
@@Leolioness44 Ever heard that Jesus was in the beginning?
Here’s the hidden mathematical breakdown:
Jesus(Greek)=888
733rd composite is 888
1068 is the 888th composite
733+1068=1801
1801-888=913
913=bereshit (Hebrew)
Bereshit is the first word of Genesis. In fact, in Judaism the Book of Genesis as a whole is referred to as Bereshit!
Jesus is “in the beginning”
(In the beginning is 3 words and 14 letters;
It’s all just a slice of π)
Great stuff, well done, my friend.
Amazing! Love this
Excellent stuff. Thank you
I am = existence = being, that's why 'I was, am, and will be'
@@andreitone i am in hebrew is "ani" אני - I, I am.
@@andreitone there is a word for each sentence, we cant take one word and apply it to past present and future tense.just like any other language,it wouldn't make sense to say in english i am for i was nor i iwas for i will be, so in hebrew or aramai would be the same.
I love your lessons ❤
Thank you for your studies. They help me better understand the scriptures and the Farther. 🙏
Beautiful!!! Thank You 🙏🏻
Thank you Sir for brilliant elucidation.
Excellent lessons. Thanks
I am re watching and this is a great study. תודה לך Σας ευχαριστώ
Great Lesson thank you!
I love these but could you slow down a little while we try to read the Hebrew with you to learn . I love Hebrew and am trying to learn from these .
Thank you for using the biblical Hebrew.
I really love your explanation. תודה רבה
i will be who i will be, there is a verse in the tanach that right now i dont have the citation for i am at work, it says i will conduct my self with you as you conduct yourself with me. "ehyeh asher ehyeh"
@@netzayorkn9037 Tehillim 18.27 (Psalm 18.26) עִם־נָבָר תִּתְבָּרָר וְעִם־עִקֵּשׁ תִּתְפַּתָּל׃ With the pure thou dost shew thyself pure; and with the perverse thou dost shew thyself contrary.
@@TheHebrewBible previous to this ehyeh asher ehyeh when moshe said to hashem here yiu send me to the children of israel and they will not believe me,who should i tell them send me? hashem answered, to your for fathers i did not revealed my name. i manifested my self to them as el shadai, but not as yud he vav he.this is my name to be remembered,any ehyeh asher ehyeh, thell them ehyeh asher ehyeh sent me, because el shadai acts accordingly to the conduct of the people or person. while yud he vav he is the attribute of mercy, here we already can understand why hashem told mosheh tell them ehyeh asher ehyeh sent me
Thank you 😊
Shalom brother :) This is my 2nd year studying Hebrew - I am an independent student of scripture and of Hebrew . I have found that (for me) fundamental to learning a language is understanding grammar- and it is more complex than verb subject object sentence structure - thank you for taking the time to share your research and your knowledge with others - HIS יהוה Word Yeshua is the bread of life ❤- May ABBA bless you and keep you shalom to you shalom to Jerusalem ❤
Also there is a gentleman Dr(?) Henry Smith with ABR (Associates for Biblical Research) who is working on his doctorate on Gen 5 and Gen 11 (fascinating area of research imo) who has a lot of information on the multiple transcripts (if you’re not already aware of)
Thank you for clarifying this phrase.
Thank you.
You're right ✅️ ❤thank you for your explanation.
Baruch Hashem!
Am Ysrael chai ❤
A group of 70 individuals was commissioned to translate the Hebrew Bible. Meaning they translated the Septuagint individually, and then the project was brought together for comparison.
Who makes better translators than Hebrew Scholars / scribes? Indeed, they were Israelite translators.
I put my trust in that they knew exactly what they were doing, and no way would they blaspheme the Name of God.
@@IanTanLK commissioned by who? In Exodus 3.12, the Hebrew word “Ehyeh” is translated in the Septuagint as ἔσομαι (esomai), which means “I will be”. It’s a future tense, active indicative of εἰμί (eimi). Why didn’t they translate it the same way in verse 14? The story of 70 translators is a legend.
Great video.
א ה י ה א ש ר א ה י ה
I am Yah, I rule, I am Yah
“This is My Name forever”
You’re looking for the NAME of a El, not a description (I will be what I will be).
It’s all just a slice of Pi
Removing the spaces reveals yet more… “eheieh asherah ya”, and “eh yehashera ya”?? Actually makes it make more sense, hmm…
I only recently subbed, and started watching your videos, so i've only seen a few. That said, were you saying the "hebrew" connotation of the divine name (tetra.) repudiates the notion of the "trinity"?
@@anonymouscosmonaut pls check out the following videos.
ua-cam.com/video/-liGhbdTGtM/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/dnO_XZpPuGo/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/6WKaQ0zu8aQ/v-deo.html
Finally, it is refreshing to see a presentation by someone knowledgeable about the Word of God. I do not know why so much time is spent looking at the greek, since it is incapable of rendering the message of the Hebrew texts. Hebrew is the godly language spoken in heaven, and predates creation itself. Greek is just a shallow pagan language that has no spiritual value whatsoever. It is just a translation which is very limited because of the shortcomings of the language itself. As such it is not where the Truth can be found. As far as english goes there is not one correct translation in the over 900 different translations and versions in existence today. I personally do not even look at the greek since it is undependable anyway and a total waste of time. Considering it is what Rome claims is the original NT text is enough for me to disregard it altogether, since the vatican is built on lies and false pretentions. God's chosen people has always been and will continue to be
Israel.
Beautiful! So, the divine being who spoke to Moshe called himself Ehyeh.
What is the relationship of this with when Jesus said "before Abraham was,I am" ?
Because we see after saying that, the people wanted to stone him. Can we say it was a wrong translation also?
I would like to hear from you
The right translation is not I am, but I was.
@@mujinya-il4lr he existed before Avraham.
If you look at the rest of that passage, he says I am multiple times. It’s only when he says he was before Avraham that they got upset. So it’s not that he was saying he is the Father, it was him saying that he supersedes Avraham, which they equate to the Torah because it was given to them again, only this time in writing. He gave such instruction that they couldn’t say they didn’t know or understand. They could not deny that they understood the covenant parameters that they were agreeing to. It is a contract.
Wow! Thank you
Are you thinking of doing an English translation that will be translated accurately according to Hebrew, or is there one already
That’s quite a massive task, and it’s impossible to capture the full sense of Hebrew in a translation,
@TheHebrewBible But you can still bring not what it is saying to what it is not like you did with I AM vs I WILL.
In English, it says that Leah's eye was weak, and is that true according to Hebrew
If I mayhap suggest the following;
1) Greens, Interlinear Hebrew, Greek, English Bible with Strong’s numbers.
And
One of Strong’s several choices of Concordance’s. With the Hebrew, Greek dictionary’s.
2) The Scriptures
by the Institute for Scripture Research ( ISR). South Africa.
I have found that each of these to be a actual near literal word for word translation with a modicum of religious dogma, tradition, and custom. To muddy the waters of the truth of the Father’s Word.
However, if your a King James only fan?
You may find yourself disappointed?
As the two recommendations above have lacking old addendum’s.
Especially The Scriptures ( ISR ).
As it does not have the following;
1) Mark 7:19. As it was originally a side bar note by an Irish monk from around 1430, that was added into the KJV’s translation from the 1611 addition onwards. And only corrected in the latest additions of the New KJV.
Also the word Easter has been restored to the original “ Passover/ Pasach. In Acts 12:4.
As well as the Addendum added by Erasmus’s translation of his third addition in 1523 under pressure from the then Protestants as one of their most cherished traditional passages taken from the Catholic’s Latin Vulgate. First added in circa 8th to 9th centuries AD.
But not to be found in any Greek manuscripts before that time, the 16th century.
This being the now well known, Johnnie Comma, as follows;
1John 5:7&8.
You will also find the the title Lord, LORD and God have been removed and restored back to the Hebrew names. From the Book titles to the name of the character’s who lived, and/ or wrote the Scriptures as the Spirit moved them.
And
The name of the Father has been restored some 6,827 times back into the Hebrew letters.
As well as the name of the Son, our Messiah.
I have found these books to have been of the greatest of value to me in my research and study while comparing them with my collection of another 42 Bible’s and New Testament’s.
And though I would have to recommend three other Bible’s to obtain a complete Bible in itself.
What I have listed will, I believe give you an excellent starting point to the fullness of the light given us by the inspiration from on high.
I found and purchased them on EBay. As EBay gives you better description’s of intended prospective purchase’s. Over the other competitors.
I pray that this has been of some use to you?
Blessings on your journey to the Father’s truth and love for us through His Son.
Shalom friend
@thomaspayne3347 Thanks for the information. I am not a KJV-only person, and I am not a fan of the Strongs either. I am not a Christian as well.
Everything you mention in the video is very good, however, I consider that in the Greek version, the concept is well represented, since the idea of God's transcendentality is expressed with the active participle of the verb.
If we take into account that the translators were pious Jews, who knew the idea well in the original Hebrew
I believe that
I'd offer "Ahayah Ashar Ahayah" can also mean "I be that, STRAIGHT, that I be." which is directly attached to Yshar'Al (ישראל) "To do YaH's Straightness"
As HE is Straight "Unchanging" and and we are called to do His Straightness upon the Earth.
Mashali/Proverbs 3:5-8
🔥💙👐🏽❤️🔥
Blessings!
Thank you Mr. Gumadi for a well explained presentation. May I suggest though if you could look into, among all other English translations, the New World Translation. For years this translation have followed closely many of your explanations. It's not as widely known as the KJV but I think you'll find it quite useful and interesting.
Honestly, I don't know why you all are fussing about this. There is no theological difference between "I AM", "I WILL BE", and "I WAS". They all pass the same theological message.
Dear friend,
The implications of this video and it’s teaching are of paramount importance.
As the, I am statement is taught that it is proof that the Son is the Father.
In essence, two of the three persons of the Trinity?
With the Holy Spirit being the third.
Even though the Son showed us that the Father is Spirit. And we are to worship HIM in spirit and in truth.
And without the, I am claim having validity?
The Trinitarian teaching falls apart on that point.
In conjunction with the two profound addendum‘s of Matthew 28:19 and 1John 5:7&8.
The Trinitarian dogma looses its foundation to the point that, we as students of the Scriptures might begin to view the Scriptures themselves with new eyes.
And begin to wonder about the meaning of the Seven Spirit’s of the Most High as found in four places in the book of Revelation and in Isaiah 11:2.
And come to realize that man is but a foolish child to dare to think that they could possibly put the Almighty into a box. A mere thing to be measured?
Thus man making for himself gods which are no gods!
And adding to the Father’s word, thus proving themselves to be lier’s.
As it is written.
That is why this understanding of the original Biblical Hebrew is of import.
Now, I pray you. Read Proverbs 30:4-6. And pray that your eyes will be opened. For these verses have been given through the prophet by the hand of the Father.
Search the Scriptures and see if these things are so?
Blessings and Shalom to you friend
@ I see you totally misunderstood my comment. I know that original Hebrew is important. That is not my issue. In fact, even if the Greek translation is I AM, we must look again at the message being passed for example in John's gospel, the people wanted to stone him for making reference to himself as deity. This scripture just proves that using the translation I AM is equivalent to I WILL BE since the Jews understood that He was pointing to Abraham in Genesis and I WILL BE in Exodus even though it uses the I AM translation rather than I WILL BE. What matters is the context and communication.
The point of my comment is that whether you use I AM or I WILL BE, you end up with the same theological statement or meaning, so no information is lost. In fact, we trinitarians do use both and acknowledge both.
In reference to trinity in your second paragraph, you misrepresent trinitarianism by saying "Son is the Father" which is heresy to trinitarianism. I don't know if you are refuting trinitarianism, but if you are, better educate yourself on what it really is else you are refuting a straw man. There are many sources on YT for example, Dr. Michael Brown, InspiringPhilosophy, Reasonablefaith.org, Sam Shamoun... especially with the evidence in Jewish scripture (I don't and won't engage this topic here because it is too vast for a comment).
Again, I want to pass across the idea that there is no symbolic or even theological difference between I AM and I WILL BE. If there were things that depended on the original Hebrew translation to make sense, this is not one. The distinction between I AM and I WILL BE does not affect trinity in any theological sense.
Lasltly, there was no need for you to make the recommendation of proverbs 30:4-6 because it doesn't have nothing to do with my comment or the importance of original translation or the distinction between I AM and I WILL BE.
The “I am “ issue is in fact a Trinitarian issue by the claimed statements that you desired to engaged your dialogue.
And yet made claims to my lack of knowledge and understanding?
Even making claim to the status of my mental health? As well as a couple of other issues that you had with my comments?
Not very helpful towards healthy discourse?
Okay friend please give me, if you will any scriptures that teach the Trinity or even mention the word Trinity?
Or the teaching thereof, of said doctrine from the Scriptures?
I pointed out Proverbs 30:4-6 to show you that the Father is the Father and that the Son is in fact the Son of the Father. And that according to the very word of the Father.
It’s something that can be googled in short order and read in about the same amount of time.
As for myself?
I didn’t come to my conclusions lightly.
But through much research and study.
And after restoring those things taken from the word of the Most High.
And removing those things that were added to the the word of the Scriptures by the hand of men and devils and not there by and through the hand of the Father.
My eyes have been opened to a Good News that reads harmoniously between the TaNaK/ Old Testament and the Breit haDasha/ Second Writings/ New Testament.
And through this I have come to the conclusion that Yahshua haMashiach/ Jesus the Christ is exactly who He announced Himself to Be and who He announced the Father and Sovereign of all that exists, seen and unseen.
Who gives us our every day and every breath and heartbeat and division of cell!
Who commands us to walk out HIS Torah/ instruction, to guard and do all that HE has given us through HIS loving commitment and unwarranted mercy and favor.
Which are those things that HIS Son gave us to do!
For as the Son said;
I only say those things that I hear My Father in heaven saying.
And only do those things that I see My Father in heaven doing.
Just as He said;
The Father is greater than I.
And witnessed to His Talmedim/ taught ones/ disciples in Matthew 28:18 ;
All authority has been given unto Me in heaven and on earth.
As it was the Father who gave Him His authority!
As the Messiah proclaimed:
That He was the only begotten Son of the Father who proceeded forth from beside the Father.
And the Son instructed us to worship the Father only and to believe in the One in whom the Father sent…
Himself, the Son.
We follow the Torah/ Instruction of the Father and through the Son. Not because by doing so do we gain favor nor do our own works account for righteousness…
But we do so as a sign, that we are children of the Father and a friend to HIS Son.
Now we know that the Father is Spirit and that we are to worship the Father in spirit and in truth.
And we know from Isaiah 11:2 and as found in four places in Revelations, the Seven Spirit’s of Elohim/ Mightiest, the Father. That the Almighty is far beyond what we mere humans can possibly comprehend and/or put into a box.
Little own a Trinity. The mere wellsprung massenations of Tertrullian and those completely alien to the understanding and practice of the original first generation of called out believers of the Way of the Natzri.
For the hidden things belong to the Almighty.
But those things that HE has disclosed to us?
Belong to us and to our children and our childrens children forever.
The Father has warned us;
MY people perish for lack of knowledge.
For they have turned away from MY Torah, and have forgotten My set-apart name.
And the Messiah has warned;
get away from Me you worker’s of lawlessness.
How is it that we could possibly be lawless if we are no longer under the Torah?
That said, I must wonder if their are any who actually read, slowly and deliberately what it is that I write, as I attempt to encourage each to dialogue and debate every issue in detailed and researched point?
To the ends of we both helping one another towards a better and more precise understanding of the Scriptures and of the truth. Not my truth but that which comes from above.
But to merely discount another’s point of understanding without a point by point, verse by verse and the demeaning childish name calling points towards a hardness of heart and lack of knowledge of the word of the Most High?
So friend please take the time to engage beyond the pale canned response.
And share, if you would.
Blessings and Shalom friend
@@thomaspayne3347 Again you missed the point, my comment was never about trinity. The reason why I did not suffer to read from the second paragraph is that you still misunderstand my comment, therefore, you have written a whole lot of unnecessary stuff I just glazed over, moreover you say I make claims about your mental health which is false. I said you should educate yourself on the trinity doctrine because you committed the most basic heresy against it. I did not even say you lack knowledge and understanding but that you misunderstood my comment, those are two different things. I already told you I will not engage the matter of trinity in a comment, but seems you didn't bother to read that part. In fact, I gave you sources where you could better see the arguments for trinity, but no! You will just repeat the most basic and weakest argument against trinity such as: "show me where the word trinity is mentioned" argument. Please go educate yourself on what the trinity doctrine is. There is a plethora of evidence for trinity especially from the Jewish scriptures. I will repeat that my issue is not about trinity, but that the meaning of I AM is the same with I WILL BE but it seems you are so interested in making it about trinity.
If while reading a small comment of mine, you fail to understand some point I clearly made and repeatedly make the issue about something it is not, then what about reading the scripture which is far more difficult than this comment? I tell you! Many become too confident and arrogant in their opinion that they miss out on what the facts are and what God is telling/showing them. Don't be like that. For a fact, you do not understand the scriptures if you refute such a basic truth about Jesus' deity.
!!!I WILL NOT ENGAGE WITH YOU ANYMORE!!!
Shalom
Very thorough and scholarly analysis. Seems the name, is the ultimate declaration of Liberty. "I Will Be Whatever I Want To Be", in English. That must be why Wisdom is ever at His Right Hand. He will always need Her! HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA Bless
Excellent explanation. Most Christians use “I am” to prove falsely that Jesus was God almighty when he said “ before Abraham was, I am !!!”.
Revelation 1:8. He says he is the beginning and the End. The Almighty. He is the Almighty God.
The phrases "I AM THAT I AM" (Hebrew: אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה), "I will be what I will be," and "I AM THAT WHICH I AM" all have similar meanings. They express the idea of self-existence and highlight God's eternal and unchanging nature. Although the wording varies, the main message about identity and existence is the same in each interpretation. 🤦♂️
Enoch and Ezekiel both had visions of God,
Ezekiel spoke of God from the waist down as fire 🔥 , Moses and the burning bush,
Shalom
The phrase that is commonly translated "I AM THAT I AM" (Hebrew: אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה), which can be interpreted in various ways, including "I will be what I will be" and "I AM THAT WHICH I AM." Each of these interpretations is valid.
I personally agree with Robert Young's translation, but I recognize that other translations are also acceptable. Ultimately, none of these interpretations are incorrect; they reflect the preferences and perspectives of the translators.
~Shalom
Very good.
How do you say that in Semitic Aramaic or Semitic Arabic?
He was He is He will be
THE SEPTUAGINT TRANSLATE THE HOLY NAME BY Ο ΩΝ MEANING THAT GOD WAS IS WILL BE THE ABSOLUTE ESSENCE OR EXISTENCE THE ETERNAL BEING AND AFTER AS THE HEBREW TEXT THEY TRANSLATE BY Ο ΚΥΡΙΟΣ ADONAI...CONGRATULATIONS FOR YOUR WORK...
This is definitely a relativistic opinion. None of the "oldest and best" Hebrew manuscripts have vowel markings. That's a fairly recent addition, by people "trying to help" because apparently God has no idea what He's doing.
The added word the scribes put in that sentence is why no one can figure out the meaning, this word "that" wasn't in the original, I am has two meanings, one is present tense, the other is future tense, God gave Moses no name, He simply told Moses to tell them He would come to them or Tell them I am coming, this is the origins of their promise that their Savior would come or appear to them, the problem is that He's already come, His name is Jesus
Who was
Who is
Who is to come
The name of God given encompasses all existence past, present and future.
YVWH
I will
I am
To be
And by whom all things are.
In response to the question, “Who shall I say did send me?”; the Holy Spirit said to Moishe, “I am who I am.” He has many names representing his relationship with mankind. All of those “Jehovah names” added together equal the “name above all other” names, Yeshua (Savior).
Ho on means "the being" or "the existence without which there is no existence."
This is how God defined Himself, but in that encounter specifically, God stated His Name to Moses when He spoke to him from the tree.
Allah
Shalom! Thoda. This is Amazing. A great lesson and teachings. I just prayed for a good and true teacher! In the NT new testament bible is the book of Hebrews? What does the word Hebrew mean? Also , A spiritual and a good person sain that the NT books and letters were written in the Hebrew Language not in Greek??? What is your comments? 'Yaway- said "I will be What I will be" Sorry for the spelling, i am catching the inspiration to. Write and make a comment. Slán. Amen 🙏
The word "Hebrew" in Hebrew is first in the Torah referring to Avraham, and it means "To traverse, from one side to the other side" . Avraham was called a Hebrew because he went from the side of paganism in Babylonian, and traversed to the side of absolute Monotheism and was sent to the promise land. . There is no solid scholarly evidence that the NT was originally written in Hebrew. Besides, most the concepts in the NT are very Greek minded as well. That's Even more evidence that they are the formulation of a Hellenistic greek world, and not that of the Hebrew. When you have a document written in Greek, and you have the information in that document promoting Greek thinking and ideas, then its easy to assume its a Hellenestic Greek work, and not a Jewish Hebraic one.
The New Testament was not written in Hebrew. It was written in Greek. It is time to leave the Greek behind and start speaking. God‘s language amen.
@gayleagibson5228 Thanks. Some if not all of the NT was written originally in Hebrew, perhaps, but as translated in Greek? Perhaps? The spoken language was Armenian? But! The reference point was the Torah law, The spoken word and the Written Word. Thanks we first translation is Greek. Perhaps? I need more time to explain Why I am thinking like this? I read about it somewhere. Comment please. Thanks 👍
@@gayleagibson5228 Keep dwelling in ignorance and lies, you seem to enjoy it.
@@ShemaHaTorahthe Hebrew Bible was translated to Greece in around 270 BCE called Septuagint (LXX transliteration)...
This is actually the true name of God look the onkekos Targum and read the commentary
"I will be with thee" was a reassurance because Moses was afraid that Pharaoh was going to kill him because he killed one of the egyptians.
It does not mean that God was NOT with Moses before.
God is with everyone of His servants, all the time.
Greek is not relevant because Hebrew expresses thought and is the original language. The root in Hebrew is haya הָיָה which means to be and to exist and life. Yahuah is the past, present and future which implies to self-exist. This is alluded to in Ecclesiastes 3:15 which refers to time: that which hath been is now; and that which is to be hath already been and Yahuah requireth that which is past. Yahuah is time and exists outside time as he is eternity. Man cannot self-exist. Yahuah is knew everyone before they are born, however, he will not be friends with all that are born. Yahuah knowing everyone before they are born is mutually exclusive to him being with his chosen vessels.
Proverbs 8:27
The 1st thing God did was “draw a circle “
It’s all about a circle and Pi.
SHEMOT (names) 3:14 is where God gave his name to Moses.
I have found the mathematics that support PI as self-existent. I can explain the mystery of 1000 days as 1, why it is said God is ONE (Echad), and other curious biblical numbers. I can explain why numbers are arranged in the way they are in Pi.
Moses= 345 and Eyheh Asher Eyheh = 543
Sum : 888
Jesus in Greek = 888
I equals I is a proposition inlogic. A equals A B equals B and A is not equal to B.
This fundamental proposition of logic is defined as God 🎉
How does this relate to the "ego eimi" from John 8:58, Moshe?
It relates in that Jesus is claiming that God is his authority.. Thus Jesus tells them "Before Abraham was God was", but Jesus gives them the poetic short for God's name י ה . . Jesus is clearly not referring to himself as "I Am", he is pointing to the one through whom Jesus claims to have authority from. of course this is likely a fabricated story anyhow. But in context that is what the author of John is referring to.
@@ShemaHaTorahVery clear Sir, thanks for imparting knowledge.
Becomong- Capasity-Holiness-the Righteousness to do and be Good. A baot has a capasity to hold the fish, and the fishermen, the net has a capasity to catch fish, when it is in let down in the right water, not drying on a Rock. The Greeks translators perhaps lack the capasity to understand the Hebrew concept of the One Lord, and the God Family, because of the Idolatary and poly dieties and herious and Pagan Gods, they put the head of ther Gods their champions, their heros on their money, they perhaps did not undestans the one Law and the one Being mentiones in the Torah . Or- light! they were, we are our own wordt teachers. That is why we need a great and the Good Shepard to lead us! Psalms 23:1- The Lord- Yah way is my Savour and my Salom!!! Salvation. Who is your Salvation and your Savour??? Amen!!! Slán.
According to the Strong’s, Mounce, Young’s, and Brig’s Hebrew/ Greek/ English dictionary’s it translates to;
“ I Exist that I Exist “
As in Self Existence!
And after reading all of the other possibilities of the fraze?
As well as word for word?
I found no reference at all for an- I am, statement?
What it does not mean is;
“ I am that I am “
To the best of my knowledge.
Our Messiah clearly declares;
That the Father is greater than I.
And
In Matthew 28:18 states;
All authority has been given unto Me in heaven and on earth.
This He said after He had risen, witnessed to over 500 persons. And just before His Ascension.
He also said:
The Father is Spirit, and we are to worship HIM in spirit and in truth.
The Messiah instructed us to worship the Father only.
And
The believe in the One in whom the Father sent. To believe in His name.
believe/ Trust.
And
That is why we are to pray to the Father and to ask in the name of HIS Son.
Matthew 28:19 has been proven to be an addendum.
And the proof of this fact is made through the seven witnesses.
Beginning with Acts 2:38 and ending with Galatians 3:27. With five of those witnesses found in the book of Acts, and the sixth found in Romans.
All seven witnesses/ verses agree.
For there is no other name under heaven by which we shall be saved.
And that name is Jesus the Christ/ Yahshua haMashiach!
Also the other said witness of, 1John 5:7 & 8. Also has proven to be another addendum.
Known as the Johonnie Comma.
This addendum cannot be found in any Greek manuscripts before the 16th century.
Nor in any Latin, Hebrew, Aramaic, or Syriac manuscripts before the 8th century.
What all this appears to mean to the best of my reason and research is;
That the Father is the Spirit and Almighty Sovereign of all that exists, seen and unseen.
And HIS Son is HIS only begotten Son who proceeded forth from beside the Father. And sits at the right hand of Power.
Just as it is written.
I truly appreciate your instruction and knowledge on this most important subject and helping people like myself, who are in search of the truth.
Not my truth, but that which comes from the word of the Father in the language that HE selected for HIS children to pass on to those who seek HIM.
And put our hope in and for the better promise given through HIS Son. The Father’s word made flesh and a ransom for many.
Baruk habah bashem Yah!/ Blessed is He who is coming in the name of Yah!
Blessings dear friend
Shalom Shalom
This is probably the best textual evidence that Jesus is God
I assume this is not a Christian video, but let me add an affirmation to this, that Hashem would become in some sense what he was not before. Maybe we should say that he would take on something to his being that he hadn't had before, for in his essence he changes not. In the New Testament , in the gospel of John, Jesus refers multiple times to being I am. In short summary, in the Tanach, God will become the God-man in the future. Prior to the incarnation he shall be still awaiting to become what he shall be. Upon the incarnation he can then say I am because there is no more becoming that Will occur in God.
We know His name IS NOT I AM. .. ..He told Moses, "YEHOVAH" not Jehovah
Ehyeh asher ehyeh
אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה
Cogito Ergo Sum.
Latin is no better than greek. If anything it is worse.
0:55 que sera
IAM That is, IAM That was, IAM that I will be. Or,
He who was, who is, and who is to come .
That's the meaning of His name. Exo 3.14
Exo 3.15 He gives His name.
King James translators hid God's name with capital LORD.
Almost 7,000 times His name appears as LORD in the o.t. Strong's word number
H3068 יְהֹוָה YHVH YeHoVaH/JEHOVAH
26:16 when He says “tell them Ehyeh sent you” why is that not Him giving His name?
It’s like telling someone “tell them Mary sent you” and you’ll get a good deal.
Your missing an important concept.. God does not have a literal name. He has 70 attributes. we say He has 70 names (as those names/attributes are recorded in Torah) but those are all associated with attributes. you can't 'name' God. Something that has a name means that something is 'owned'. . After a Jew learns the 70 names of God, he can then go on to learn the 600,000 names of God. But this requires memorizing the whole Torah. The video explains that what's being given here to Moses is an attribute, NOT a personal name.
@ interesting. Thanks for your thoughts.
@@ShemaHaTorah not sure if you missed the “hidden in your Bible” concept:
It’s all just a slice of Pi
Learn gematria
Proverbs 8:27
The 1st thing God did was “draw a circle “
It’s all about a circle and Pi.
SHEMOT (names) 3:14 is where God gave his name to Moses.
I have found the mathematics that support PI as self-existent. I can explain the mystery of 1000 days as 1, why it is said God is ONE (Echad), and other curious biblical numbers. I can explain why numbers are arranged in the way they are in Pi.
Moses= 345 and Eyheh Asher Eyheh = 543
Sum : 888
Jesus in Greek = 888
Don't forget Exodus 3:15 where God actually made His ETERNAL NAME known.
E x odus 3:15 Y L T98
[15] And God saith again unto Moses, ‘Thus dost thou say unto the sons of Israel, J ehovah, G od of your fathers, G od of Abraham, G od of Isaac, and G od of Jacob, hath sent me unto you; this [is] My name - to the age, and this My memorial, to generation - generation.
Verse 14 show the meaning of His name, He who was, is and will be thus eternal.
@@andrevisser7542 this is what the Father showed me. This has been my understanding now for 3 years.
v13-Moses asked for
1-His name and
2-what should he tell the people
V14 He gave His name - Ehyeh
V15 He gave his memorial
At the end of v15, He sums up His answer to Moses’ questions:
(1) this is my name (first statement -v14) forever, and
(2) this is how I am to be remembered in every generation (the Elohai of Avraham, Isaac, and Jacob).
I’ve heard and read many scholars saying that the YHWH is a different tense of Ehyeh. They say YHWH has the same meaning as Ehyeh - the only self-existent one- but is a different tense of that word.
They say the Father says I am, but when we speak of his name it would be He is.
Which doesn’t seem quite right either for a name. Because if someone asks me my name, I say Mary. If they repeat my name in conversation, they do not say it in a different “tense”.
Would you say to me, hey Mary? Or would you say hey, she who is Mary? Or hey, the Mary ?
This is where the tense theory doesn’t sit quite right with me.
Some people pronounce His name differently , more like Ahiah from the Aramaic Lamsa bible. Some people spell it a little differently as in Ahayah.
Just as there are quite a few ways people pronounce the Messiah’s name- same name, same spelling, different pronunciation.
We could all be wrong. But this is where the Father lead me and is my understanding at this time.
I do not agree. The justification for the proper rendering being I will be is that the Hebrew form is the imperfect, but the imperfect does not have anything close to 100% correspondence to the future tense. I Am is the superior rendering. The Father has always existed, does exist and will always exist. He is being, existence, the Supreme Being. Ehyeh can be Will Be, but there is no necessity to rendering it that way. So, given the reality that The Creator is always existent, rendering the word as future alone is taking away from the text, a terrible sin. Saying that Ehyeh is used to represent the future tense elsewhere is disingenuous. Many, many Hebrew words are used one way in one context and another way in another context and the imperfect tense is appropriately rendered as past or present tense in so many instances.
@@ThePropriate Ehyeh is used in the same context in Exodus 3.12.
Either way it's rendered, when the Hebrew is rendered into another language it loses some meaning. The best we can do is employ a rendering that gives the most complete picture of what is being expressed in the Hebrew text. The core of the difficulty is that in English, we view the word Being as static, but Being is a participle, which indicates that it's an active thing. To my mind, it includes the idea of becoming. Anything being is becoming. So, overall the best rendition does not exclude the fact that Yahweh was and is, which is the common sense understanding of I will be. The best rendition is I Am Who I Am, because it includes the full reality of who the El is. I get your point that Ehyeh is elsewhere indicating a future reality, but in this case Being, if understood as an active principle, better brings across the fullness of the meaning. When something is actively Being, it is becoming, so Being says it all, while becoming only speaks of the future. Shalom to you.
Pro-noun language vs pro-verb language...
The battle of the ages.
Pro-noun folks are all about identity-pro-verb people just want action!
This is his name for all generations ahayah Asher ahayah his name appears as hayah in the Hebrew not that Yiddish speaking folks
Change either implies becoming better or becoming worse, God cannot become better or become worse.
Thank you for this clarification! I Am that I Am never made any sense. When Moses asked His Name, the response was I will Be What I Will Be! I studied Hebrew but have stopped because of ambiguity. When I arrived at the Binyan Verbs I stopped. Even many Jewish people do not understand this.
If I may ask, what is your personal theology? Jewish, Christian? Denomination, if any? I ask because your rejection of the Septuagint is at odds with just about every Christian scholar I've ever heard.
The LXX we now have is from 300-400 AD. There are hardly a handful of fragments from BC, which incidentally had the Tetragram in some form, not Kyrios.
In my experience, generally Christian scholars (mostly Western) are biased towards Greek/ Western against Hebraic / Jewish / Eastern thought. And Greek supremacy is incimpatible with the Tanakh (cf Zech 9:13; Dan 10:20). It's a civilisational and ideological issue.
My personal theology has evolved. I began as a fundamentalist Christian (Evangelical, Open Brethren). Over the course I embraced hyper-dispensationalism (post-Acts), based on the differences within the NT and recognising the need to take the Hebrew prophets at their word. At the moment you can say I embrace Jewish theology, though I am not a Jew. Bottomline, I am failful to YHVH, and accept NT where it agrees with the Tanakh. Otherwise I ignore it.
Aum Namah Yoni
God said unto Moses: "I am Allah". "The Elah", "The God."
"Allah has sent you." not "I am has sent you."
"Allah" means "The God".
Not his name but what his name means!
Compare your interpretation with John 18:6 before you oppose those English versions.
All well and good,
But even the demons know the name of God.
But you ought to be sure to love the Lord your God, to know Him and be known by Him, and to love your neighbor as yourself.
To not just know Him by name, but to do the will of your Father in heaven, then you will be sons and daughters of Him.
Repent of your own ways and trust in the Lord Jesus, be reconciled to this God of whom you scratch your head about His name.
Well, here’s what this God has said. “Look unto ME (** to YHVH **), and be ye SAVED, all the ends of the earth: for I am God, and THERE IS NONE ELSE. I have sworn by myself, the word is gone out of my mouth in righteousness, and shall not return, That UNTO ME EVERY KNEE SHALL BOW, EVERY TONGUE SHALL SWEAR (** it does NOT say to Jesus **). Surely, shall one say, in YHVH have I righteousness and strength: even to him shall men come; and all that are incensed against him shall be ashamed. In YHVH shall ALL THE SEED OF ISRAEL be JUSTIFIED, and shall glory.” Yeshayahu (Isaiah) 45.22-25.
Great teaching. Because Hashem is G-d ❤
Hashem is not God. YHVH is God.
It’s Yiddish not Hebrew
Porqué si yo pago mi Internet tengo que ver tanta propaganda que no sirve para nada
🇮🇱💙🇮🇱💙🇮🇱💙🇮🇱💙🇮🇱💙
Only French please sorry, ou en FRANCAISE
It's sad you trying to translate his name but the name of God has no translation.. think about it it's the same in the original Hebrew and in English to pronounce it use the ancient Hebrew in English u cannot translate the name of God is confusing his name is the same for all generations don't listen to this devil he knows nothing he's making up words so you understand smh
"But He CAN BE what He had NOT BEEN"
Thanks for that, Yehovah (He who was, is and will be) said He is the only God and the only saviour (yeshua in Hebrew) then He *manifested* as Yehoshua (Yehovah-saviour) to do exactly that.
Yehovah also became Yehoshua of the world...
@@andrevisser7542 Isaiah 12-2 does say that Hashem will become ישועה (yeshua), which means salvation, not a person. Notice the letter ה at the end of the word, it’s feminine. The word for saviour is מוֹשִׁיעַ (moshia), and in Isaiah 43:11; 45:21 and Hosea 13:4, it is written Hashem is the only Saviour, none else. In Psalm 146:3, the Israelites were told not to put trust in the “son of man”, because there is no תְשׁוּעָה (teshuah, salvation) in him. So whilst He can be what He had not been, He will be what HE will be, not what we think He should be.
@@TheHebrewBible Doesn't moshia actually means "anointed"?
@@TheHebrewBible, the same one who gave Moses His eternal name also manifested as man to restore what Adam has lost.
@@ALAINDEGRANDPRE the word moshia (מושיע) is different from the word mashiach (משיח). The latter means “anointed one”.
@@TheHebrewBible That might be but it appears nowhere in the Tanach
"W-R-O-N-G wrong!"
lol
What makes you an expert? You are actually revealing yourself to be an idiot with that comment.
@SDsc0rch lol..sometimes I get over-excited
He that WAS , He that IS , He that WILL BE 👉 " YEHOVAH" , I AM is a incorrect translation....
This all becomes much more clear when we understand the concept that ONLY HaShem exists. Everything else is either an emanation or a transient blip of energy. Nothing else really exists, its all an illusion of transient energy and forms. HaShem is the 'Existing one', he is all that that there is. HaShem Echad. That's why he tells Moses "I am The Existing One", I am being itself.
KING JESUS!!!- THE GOD OF ISRAEL. 🇮🇱 God manifested in the flesh. 1 Timothy 3:16
Baal worship
Amen, Yehovah said He is the only God and the only saviour (yeshua in Hebrew) then He *manifested* as Yehoshua (Yehovah-saviour) to do exactly that.
𝗜 𝗔𝗺 𝗪𝗵𝗼 𝗜 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗯𝗲. The God of Israel .. ? My God Your God ? depends on where your heart is. No matter t𝗵𝗲 𝗢𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝘀 𝗠𝘁𝘁 𝟐𝟐:𝟑𝟕-𝟒𝟎 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. 𝗠𝘁𝘁 𝟏𝟐: 𝟑𝟎 Jn 6:29 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗼𝗳 𝗚𝗼𝗱, 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘆𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗵𝗶𝗺 𝘄𝗵𝗼𝗺 𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝘁𝗵 𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁.
Thank you 😊
Compare your interpretation with John 18:6 before you oppose those English versions.