Master Hyperfocal Distance for SHARP Landscape Photos

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 33

  • @AreOle_photography
    @AreOle_photography  Місяць тому +2

    I also want to add that the longer the focal length the shallower the depth of field and the longer the hyperfocal distance will be, but usually the close forgeound isn’t very important when we use a telephoto lens. I had a section in the video about this , but had to cut it out due to wind noise. Hope the video is useful, have a great day📸☕️

  • @SiemPride
    @SiemPride Місяць тому +1

    Great video Are!

  • @synnvegudlaugbarlien2776
    @synnvegudlaugbarlien2776 Місяць тому +1

    Fin video og gode tips 💙

  • @Raykenn1
    @Raykenn1 Місяць тому +1

    Enjoyed your video thanks for posting 👍

  • @Leicashootr
    @Leicashootr Місяць тому +1

    Great video thanks 🙏🏻

  • @johanp8391
    @johanp8391 27 днів тому +1

    Good video, thanks

  • @NorwayHikesTrails
    @NorwayHikesTrails Місяць тому +1

    Nice video Are Ole. Wishing you a great week 👍

    • @AreOle_photography
      @AreOle_photography  Місяць тому

      Thanks so much , I’m glad you liked it☺️ Have a nice week ahead☕️📸

  • @stigfloberghagenphotography
    @stigfloberghagenphotography Місяць тому +1

    Very nice 👍🙂

  • @griseldatavera7902
    @griseldatavera7902 Місяць тому +1

    Thanks Dear Excellent tips!

    • @AreOle_photography
      @AreOle_photography  Місяць тому +1

      @@griseldatavera7902 Thanks so much my friend, I’m realy glad you found them useful☺️

  • @harrr53
    @harrr53 Місяць тому +1

    What was the app you mentioned? I always stick to the small aperture (usually f/11 or f/13) and focusing about a third into the picture, but I am still curious about the app.

    • @AreOle_photography
      @AreOle_photography  Місяць тому +1

      Hey, the app is called photo pills, it’s realy good for planing almost anything in photography , from where the sun, moon, milkiway will rise and set, but also to find the hyper focal length for for your camera and focal length at any given aperture

    • @harrr53
      @harrr53 Місяць тому +1

      @AreOle_photography Thank you!

  • @Tony-c7z9t
    @Tony-c7z9t Місяць тому +1

    43 centimetres equals about 17.5 inches almost 1.5 feet just FYI

  • @nevvanclarke9225
    @nevvanclarke9225 Місяць тому +1

    I teach Photography also and you don't have to be exact with hyper focal except if you are using a medium format camera and that you are low to the ground they are too exceptions other than that so long as it's roughly 1/3 you'll be okay and yes, I shoot professional landscape photography

    • @AreOle_photography
      @AreOle_photography  Місяць тому

      I guess the depth of field in medium format cameras are quite shallow relative to the focal length and aperture , I have never tried a medium format, the resolution and image quality from the gfx system looks amazing so definetly would love to try one one day. I apriciate your input mate🙏

    • @nevvanclarke9225
      @nevvanclarke9225 Місяць тому

      @@AreOle_photography I love my GFX camera now I worked really hard to save for it and I'm certainly not going back to full frame not that there's anything wrong with full frame or APC but the files out of the GFX are just jaw dropping and you can't see what you've seen. I was in Fuji and they don't make a full frame camera so medium format was it and I haven't regretted it. It's actually helped my photography career as well. I'm not saying it's all about the camera but the files out of this thing you can just about pretty much do anything with you can shoot almost straight into the sun without having to bracket.

    • @AreOle_photography
      @AreOle_photography  Місяць тому +1

      I can imagine the dynamic range on them are somthing else, i actually used apc until a few years ago , when i got a full frame and for me it definetly felt like a big step up, so i can imagine its the same going from full frame to medium format, hopefully one day i will get my hand one too. Have a great day☕️

  • @BobN54
    @BobN54 Місяць тому +1

    There are basic misconceptions here. Using hyperfocal technique will never lead to sharp photos. Nothing is ever 'in focus' except objects in the exact plane of focus. Once or twice you say 'acceptably' in focus, which is more accurately in focus, but few people know what 'acceptably' actually means. It depends on the circle of confusion chosen, and the usual one 1/1500 of the frame diagonal is saying that a resolution equivalent to about 1MP is usual.

    • @AreOle_photography
      @AreOle_photography  Місяць тому

      Thanks for the info, I belive you are to the point, I should have done a better job in explaining what I mean by acceptably sharp, I will definetly keep that in mind if I make a new video on this topic. Thank you😀

    • @BobN54
      @BobN54 Місяць тому +1

      @@AreOle_photography It's very good to find a UA-cam photographer who can take constructive criticism in the spirit that it's intended. Thank you. I'd just add, for information that DOF and diffraction blur always work hand in hand, as you alluded to in explaining your choice of f/11 for deep DOF. If you really want peak sharpness, it's usually best to aim for the minimum DOF that covers your compositional requirements.

    • @AreOle_photography
      @AreOle_photography  Місяць тому

      Getting honest and constructive feedback is the best way to learn, and even though I been doing landscape/ outdoor photography as a hobby for two decades Im learning somthing new all the time, both on technical side and creative side of photography, and when it comes to teaching I’m a complete beginner, so feedback like this is welcomed☺️I’m not that rigid with depth of field in my own photography, it depends on the forgeound , but for most full frame cameras I belive a good starting point is between f8/ f11 i , and I think for a beginner knowing the concept of hyperfocal distance can be useful , but I have a video on depth of field planed and I will definetly add your point in that