Uber, Lyft drivers constantly cancel on blind passengers with guide dogs, San Jose teacher says

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 лют 2025
  • There’s an issue involving Uber and Lyft. Some people who are legally blind say rideshare drivers are seeing their service dogs and cancelling their rides. They say what these companies are doing is humiliating, and illegal. Investigative reporter Candice Nguyen reports.
    Stay Connected:
    Follow us on Twitter: / nbcbayarea
    Like us on Facebook: / nbcbayarea
    Follow us on Instagram: / nbcbayarea
    Follow us on TikTok: / nbcbayarea
    Catch up on all the day's news:
    www.nbcbayarea.com
    Download our mobile app:
    On iOS: nbcbay.com/R1BhqYM
    On Android: nbcbay.com/rUcA97h
    Watch us on OTT:
    Add our channel on Roku: bit.ly/3ySK60j
    Download our app on Amazon Fire TV: amzn.to/3FmmiEA

КОМЕНТАРІ • 518

  • @saucecastillo460
    @saucecastillo460 8 місяців тому +75

    Drivers shouldn't cancel on people with actual service animals, but something needs to be done to identify service animals, bc too many people lie. Not only in Ubers, but bringing their dogs into grocery stores & other places animals shouldn't be.
    And as long as there's no way to differentiate service animals from support animals & pets, this will continue

    • @aa777flyer
      @aa777flyer 8 місяців тому

      Service animals, especially those for the blind have special harnesses. But either way it's wrong. If I could I would drive her for free every day.

    • @anthonyjones7264
      @anthonyjones7264 8 місяців тому

      The issue is the dog is based on the person with disabilities. A person with pots, seizures, and chronic migraines all use them for different reasons. There should be a certification process but it should also be used to help people with disabilities get more access to service dogs. Some people with disabilities can't afford a professional trained dog. So they do what they can get by with.

    • @dafutureexwife
      @dafutureexwife 8 місяців тому

      Preach!!!!

    • @UpUpDnDnLtRtLtRtBAStart
      @UpUpDnDnLtRtLtRtBAStart 8 місяців тому +2

      You do know they have paper work and official service dog apparatus

    • @saucecastillo460
      @saucecastillo460 8 місяців тому +4

      @@anthonyjones7264 I feel like we're talking about 2 different things. I'm saying there should be a way for a driver or someone working at a grocery store (and I see a TON of dogs that I know aren't service animals in grocery stores) to be able to verify that the dog is an actual service dog, as opposed to a support animal or pet.
      Like an ID that shows both the owner and the dog, bc a vest can be shared like a handicap placard. I don't want disabled folks denied access, but I don't wanna let a potentially untrained pet in my uber, and it bites me, plus animals tend to smell. Also, when people bring their pets in grocery stores, it's wildly inconsiderate, as not everyone is comfortable with dogs

  • @user-eh2hj8bx6O
    @user-eh2hj8bx6O 8 місяців тому +80

    The fake service animals behaving badly on planes and in stores have ruined it for people with real guide dogs.
    Maybe she should say "I'm blind" because I don't think some of the drivers understand it's a service dog and not a pet.

    • @hargosolomon
      @hargosolomon 8 місяців тому +4

      Thats irrelevant

    • @meghanlong3494
      @meghanlong3494 8 місяців тому +2

      i read a headline about an emotional support alligator and im like omg soenone gonna try to bring that in my car someday

    • @lakeshjasarevic4955
      @lakeshjasarevic4955 8 місяців тому +3

      @@meghanlong3494 ADA regulations say only dogs and miniature horses qualify as service animals.

    • @WeirGoi
      @WeirGoi 8 місяців тому +3

      @@lakeshjasarevic4955They said support animals, which a lot of lay-people think is the same as a service animal. We can turn down a support animal.

    • @mercurio4256
      @mercurio4256 8 місяців тому +3

      Emotional support animals aren't service animals.

  • @AATT786
    @AATT786 8 місяців тому +56

    To everyone is angry at the drivers here, Do you know Uber and Lyft take %70 of any trip? Plus they don’t pay extra for the extra time and the cleaning that drivers have to do after getting a service dog in their OWN car.!! So stop BS about drivers and talk to Uber and Lyft to pay fairly for such services.!

    • @MiiTheProfessa
      @MiiTheProfessa 8 місяців тому +4

      Hellooooo❤❤❤❤❤

    • @dcarr-kr7hk
      @dcarr-kr7hk 8 місяців тому +2

      @AATT786... I agree.

    • @SNM330
      @SNM330 8 місяців тому +3

      So get a different Job because if you can't follow the law you shouldn't be working for them. Hope all these drivers that are saying no are jobless now. How hard has it become to just follow the rules it's the law. And shame on you for making someone with a disability feel this way.

    • @cliff1291
      @cliff1291 8 місяців тому

      @@SNM330 Can I come and spill a drink in your car for free?

    • @htooman5280
      @htooman5280 8 місяців тому +4

      please call uber pet😀😀

  • @spiritualvibrations2825
    @spiritualvibrations2825 8 місяців тому +97

    Uber/Lyft don't pay enough for all of these requirements......

    • @chuckxu5910
      @chuckxu5910 8 місяців тому

      There’s a lot of fake dogs out there Uber drivers, many pit bulls were guide dogs 🦮near my hood east Oakland AKA little Haiti 🇭🇹

    • @soliniv1411
      @soliniv1411 8 місяців тому +8

      Amen

    • @rocketboostjump
      @rocketboostjump 8 місяців тому

      ​@jakeshields2905 executives of uber should drive these blind people. They get paid millions.

    • @zeusmonroe3793
      @zeusmonroe3793 8 місяців тому +10

      Just an excuse as to why your not doing your job right.

    • @spiritualvibrations2825
      @spiritualvibrations2825 8 місяців тому +5

      @@zeusmonroe3793 place your opinion in here 🗑

  • @dafutureexwife
    @dafutureexwife 8 місяців тому +14

    I get that it's not a good practice but you can't force people to do these jobs...Im pretty sure Uber/Lyft isn't going to reimburse if there's a mishap. Some drivers probably aren't going against the disability.....just the animal. Ive done Doordash/Instacart because I prefer to deal with goods than actual people simple because of things like this. It's a very touchy subject but what about people who are allergic to animals....a person can get in afterwards and have a full attack simple because they weren't aware of the previous passenger. My concern is Uber/Lyft going to reimburse me for cleaning up after the job...otherwise, I wouldn't do it either. Everybody should be comfortable...not just a few....EVERYBODY!!! And before anybody come attempting to troll me as uncaring, Im a disabled Veteran....so yeah.....just keep scrolling.

    • @annstillwell730
      @annstillwell730 8 місяців тому +1

      This is why I only do delivery. People don't train thir animals correctly or others have allergies it's a no win.

    • @dafutureexwife
      @dafutureexwife 8 місяців тому +1

      @jakeshields2905 Since most laws get broken anyways, it will continue. Furthermore there are plenty of Federal Laws that goes against peoples morals and beliefs, so yea, I don't see these drivers being any different. Laws are made up by humans. They can be revised to cease the crybabies humans and then, it'll still piss off other humans. Like I said, that's why I don't do Uber/Lyft.....I can choose if I want to delivery you your food for no tip or just because of the area your delivery is
      in. My life and property is more important in the end since that by law, is my responsibility. People get so caught up in thinking they're being done unfairly when at the end of the day, shouldn't everybody be comfortable?? Or is there a law against being comfortable??

    • @dafutureexwife
      @dafutureexwife 8 місяців тому

      @@annstillwell730 Exactly....but if Uber offers the PET option like they say, then I would use that...but as they said in the video......its not a pet (cue eye rolling). So maybe they can come up with an ANIMAL Transport option...then the drivers can sign up to also do those assignments. Now after that, if the clients don't sign up for that option because they feel that dosen't apply...then don't cry unfair...because now, you're being irrational.

  • @BayAreaWrecker
    @BayAreaWrecker 8 місяців тому +32

    Is Lyft gonna pay ruined seats every time ? Thought so

    • @grazz7865
      @grazz7865 8 місяців тому

      I can’t understand how you would make any money. Your car, your insurance, your registration, your fuel, your maintenance, your accidents, your mileage, your car payments, your problems. Biggest scam I have ever seen! Uber and Lyft do absolutely nothing. A computer takes the information via the app then assigns a “driver” when someone responds. Uber and Lyft could be a 15 year old kid in his garage!

  • @chanelf.4934
    @chanelf.4934 8 місяців тому +23

    what’s sad is the app allows you to specifically order a Uber Pet and they still deny you. I ordered a disability one and got denied for having a medical equipment by a driver.

    • @techwhipped
      @techwhipped 8 місяців тому +1

      Uber and Lyft drivers have been know to cancel rides based off a users race this is something that not new this has been happening since the start of lyft and uber first came to town. I used to be a driver for Lyft stopped driving for them after a passenger disrespected my car by throwing trash in it.

    • @Grimm5_5
      @Grimm5_5 8 місяців тому +1

      @@techwhipped is that all that happened to you?

    • @eza_ahm
      @eza_ahm 8 місяців тому

      @@techwhippedI cancel black & Indians - one for being a potential danger, the other for not giving tips. Now u tell me am I wrong?

    • @WeirGoi
      @WeirGoi 8 місяців тому

      We sign up for Pets, but I imagine that if they can’t find a Pets driver close by, that they offer it to the next driver and never say it’s Pets. There are plenty of drivers who are okay with Pets. I’m not one of them.

  • @andylin6560
    @andylin6560 8 місяців тому +21

    Wait.. So as independent contractor, we are now unable to make decisions on who we pick up or not? sounds like Uber wants an employee and not an independent contractor.
    Edit: Take accountability? I'm not saying getting denied because you have a service dog is right, however that is what's happening, so work around it. The second you match with a driver call him and ask if a dog is ok, rather than wait for him to get to your door then surprise him with the dog.

    • @grazz7865
      @grazz7865 8 місяців тому

      You’re getting denied because it’s his car and doesn’t want to clean the mess

    • @Whitneypyant
      @Whitneypyant 4 місяці тому

      In the Lyft contract you can’t denied service dogs. That federal law

    • @RKingis
      @RKingis 3 місяці тому

      ​@@grazz7865What mess? A properly trained service dig is trained to go when you tell them to go.

    • @grazz7865
      @grazz7865 3 місяці тому

      @@RKingis really? There’s a reason people don’t like other people’s pets in their cars and homes. If they don’t piss and shit all over the place, the hair and odor is there to stay.

  • @mikegollenbusch7067
    @mikegollenbusch7067 8 місяців тому +13

    The ada needs to have a provision for certification of a service animal..the way it is now anybody can claim their dog is a service animal

    • @eza_ahm
      @eza_ahm 8 місяців тому

      They claim it’s for emotional support, I am tell em fk off. 😂😂😂

    • @grazz7865
      @grazz7865 8 місяців тому +1

      Good luck fighting that

  • @t.r.8427
    @t.r.8427 8 місяців тому +12

    I've been driving for Uber and Lyft for 5 years. I HAVE taken these types of rides but I can fully understand why a driver would refuse. The last one I took I picked up two blind people from a train station going to nearby hotel. They were legit blind and needed the service animal, one was a german shepherd the other a lab. Both animals were very well trained, both passengers were very nice. I did the job, got them and their animals in and out of my car as well as luggage. My total fare was 8.00 and they tipped 5.00, but then I had to take my car out of service because there was a HUGE about of animal hair all through my car. I spent at least 20 minutes shop vaccuming the hair out but it was actually took a few weeks for me to eventually get all of the hair out. It really does make a mess. What if my next passenger is allergic? It's not the animals or the disabled passengers themselves, it's the mess it makes in your car. For the amount of aggrevation these trips cause it's NOT WORTH the small amount of money the driver makes. Please keep that in mind before you judge a driver for not wanting to take these rides.

    • @grazz7865
      @grazz7865 8 місяців тому

      You signed up for public transportation and one of the biggest scams out there. Get over it or good luck fighting ADA laws.

    • @thomashudson3694
      @thomashudson3694 8 місяців тому +3

      I mean if it's that bad in your car all you got to do is take a picture and show Uber and they pay for the cleanup I've gotten paid like $100 just for somebody throwing up in my car

    • @grazz7865
      @grazz7865 8 місяців тому

      @@thomashudson3694 if it’s that easy, you could photo shop a picture every week. That’s an extra $400 a month

    • @Durka-Durka
      @Durka-Durka 8 місяців тому +1

      ​@thomashudson3694 or maybe have seat covers that can be removed and washed

    • @grazz7865
      @grazz7865 8 місяців тому +2

      @@Durka-Durka if I even considered doing Uber or Lyft, I would DEFINITELY put ass gasket on the seats. After all those nasty asses on my seats, I have to put my friends and family on those same seats when we go somewhere?! F that!

  • @AntyTiff
    @AntyTiff 8 місяців тому +4

    They should just have a special blanket to cover the seats, duh.

    • @brittnejon9719
      @brittnejon9719 8 місяців тому

      Too much hassle for 8-10 dollars, nope not worth it.

  • @lewissibanda4993
    @lewissibanda4993 8 місяців тому +56

    These cars don’t belong to Uber. They belong to individuals.

    • @almasysephirot4996
      @almasysephirot4996 8 місяців тому +2

      You are wrong. If the animal disrupts the ordinary operation of a business, and the owner can’t bring the dog under their control, they may be denied service. If they were shedding, and substantial amount of hair was shed this would apply, and you could be booted. These instances where they flat out deny her when explaining it s a service dog, and just looking at her no reasonable person could assume otherwise she needs an assistant dog, should be fired, no second chance. Saying it as a driver. Same for service animal fraud. You commit such a crime once, proven to Lyft or Uber and you should never be allowed back on the platform. Not because the event itself is so outrageous but because it destroys the foundation of trust that when a passenger says service animal it be a service animal that is trained to assist the particular handler who wants to travel with you. A driver should never have to make split second evals because there are service dog fraudsters who are not willing to pay $3 for the per service, and then jeopardizing the drivers job.

    • @high63294
      @high63294 8 місяців тому +4

      The problem is that the rates Uber/Lyft pay the drivers is too low. Many feel to just conplete quick rides with no stops. Having a service animal gets the car dirty with hairs, mostly always, other times the car will stink, i personally dont mind that because i am prepared with cleaning supplies and a small vacuum, however, years ago, normal service (with a service animal as well) used to pay way more than nowadays. If Uber/Lyft would pay a fair wage, this would not happen as much, or not at all. Blame Uber/Lyft and their practices. The same goes if you need a ride to the airport for example, a 20 mile ride might run you 50/60 dollarss and the driver is getting at most 20 with maybe an extra dollar. Such driver pay is also why riders have to wait longer to get a vehicle, such low pay is why the friendly customer service is mostly gone, for drivers to make money, they need to complete as many trips as possible, no time for helping with service animals, no time for extra stops (that do not pay the driver more), no time for anything extra for the driver to do. Make no mistake, this is the companies fault. For anyone that has used this service for years, you know service was much different before than now.

    • @htooman5280
      @htooman5280 8 місяців тому +1

      please call uber & lift pet ok

    • @Latinforever99
      @Latinforever99 8 місяців тому +6

      Being an independent contractor doesn't matter by law you can not denied them if you cannot understand that you should be deactivated permanently

    • @eza_ahm
      @eza_ahm 8 місяців тому

      Exactly!

  • @mikejessiemma
    @mikejessiemma 8 місяців тому +6

    Both sides have good points. Uber could easily resolve this by allowing Uber Pet to be the same price as Uber x for people with service animals. As a ride share driver I 100% understand not wanting animals in your car. Blaming the driver solely is short sighted. Hopefully a resolution is reached.

    • @grazz7865
      @grazz7865 8 місяців тому

      Just fake a breakdown.

  • @thevarietyshow-5158
    @thevarietyshow-5158 8 місяців тому +2

    These cars are owned by the drivers, and they should have the right to decide who they drive and who they refuse. It’s unreasonable for them to pick up someone for $5 and end up with ruined seats due to dog hair and dirt from the dogs’ feet. Most dogs are not kept clean, so why should drivers have to endure that smell for the entire ride? Isn’t it enough that they already deal with some horribly smelly customers? Enough is enough, Uber

  • @WeirGoi
    @WeirGoi 8 місяців тому +1

    They aren’t being picked up because of other passengers. Passengers who lie about the status of their dogs have caused drivers to not want to deal with pets at all. Most people with dogs don’t notice the smell, but every dog stinks. Most don’t behave either. They jump on seats, fling their fur everywhere, and are scary. Many pet owners never scroll down to the Uber Pets option, so they think they have to lie about their pets. Just pay the $5! I had one lady lie about her disability. She saw me well enough from a distance to run to my car, but claimed she was blind. Then her “service animal” made a mess of my car. She then said she had a vacuum to clean up the mess. Of course when we arrived at her place she admitted there wasn’t a vacuum. I knew that already. We know when riders are lying.
    Dog hair is really hard to vacuum up and will warrant a stoppage just to get it removed properly ($$$). The next riders probably won’t be happy to get any on their clothes. But if they do, who do these liars think they’re going to blame? The driver or some previous rider lying about a service animal? They will blame the driver. Uber and Lyft don’t care. A driver or his family member can have a severe allergy to fur and they’re told they will just have to suffer.

  • @DashingintheD
    @DashingintheD 8 місяців тому +2

    Full time Uber and Lyft driver here. And we are independent contractors we have the right to decline any ride doesn’t matter the situation. If the driver doesn’t feel comfortable we can decline. That’s in the contract like it or not. It’s our car not uber or Lyft vehicle! And Uber and Lyft will not pay for damage or scratched up seats do to having an animal in your vehicle!

    • @Whitneypyant
      @Whitneypyant 4 місяці тому

      And you can get fine. You can pay the $10,000 fine? By the way Lyft can deactivate you

  • @peryole
    @peryole 8 місяців тому +12

    I'm disabled and i love dogs, a trained dog can ride in my car anytime, but you cannot be realistic in trying to force someone with allergies or a fear of dogs to takes those dogs, both of those things are also disabilities and would also violate the ada. Further, the government routinely violates those laws and since care. It's should be the owner of the properties choice

  • @MiiTheProfessa
    @MiiTheProfessa 8 місяців тому +16

    Uber/Lyft needs to create a Disability app for things like this.
    All them dogs ain’t service dogs and we are independent contractors we don’t have to do anything
    Uber/Lyft barely pays just create a driver/rider app for pets etc Uber took the Uber pet away and they don’t compensate app for those ppl only and pay accordingly to provide the services we are not healthcare providers and these are our personal cars

    • @unboxingcomanapereira
      @unboxingcomanapereira 8 місяців тому

      I totally agree with it

    • @grazz7865
      @grazz7865 8 місяців тому +2

      This is what you signed up for public transportation. Get over it or good luck fighting ADA laws.

    • @shakeyj4523
      @shakeyj4523 8 місяців тому +2

      Being an independent contractor means NOTHING. You allow the public in your car, so you fall under public access rights. Stop being such a whiny wimp.

    • @Whitneypyant
      @Whitneypyant 4 місяці тому

      Problem is you can’t isolate them. Besides Lyft already provides that

  • @SoulBrights
    @SoulBrights 8 місяців тому +2

    The main causes of cancel is drivers are being pay like shyt. If drivers are well pay there will be no problems. All Uber can do is deactivate drivers. And majority of drivers would cancel so if Uber and Lyft deactivated majority of drivers there will not be enough services. It's all come down to money 💰.

  • @Raymond-zz5pi
    @Raymond-zz5pi 8 місяців тому +10

    The part of independent contractor that doesn't conform.

    • @eza_ahm
      @eza_ahm 8 місяців тому

      N will never conform

    • @Raymond-zz5pi
      @Raymond-zz5pi 8 місяців тому

      @@eza_ahm no thumbs up since N is not a word.

  • @tgooose
    @tgooose 8 місяців тому +29

    There are ride services for people with disabilities. These riders don't want to pay extra and they want us to take the time to stop and clean up the dog hair at our expense. Plus, they never tip even though we have to fold up walkers and wheelchairs, take all the extra time

    • @latoyajeniques2774
      @latoyajeniques2774 8 місяців тому +7

      Sadly, I support this comment. I drive for both Uner & Lyft and it's sad that no one is considering the drivers could be allergic or the next passengers could be allergic - vacuuming doesn't solve the issue for many with pet allergies. Tipping would be awesome when accepting these rides and/or assisting with medical equipment. It would be greater if they utilized the resources avail to them for transportation as opposed to have a news segment created.. but I get, I guess

    • @lakeshjasarevic4955
      @lakeshjasarevic4955 8 місяців тому +5

      Ride services disabled people are often limited to medical or legal transport. Most don't include transportation for recreational purposes. Speaking as a disabled person with a service animal I can say that we don't get cost of living adjusted for service animal expenses. Therefore when living on a fixed income that's barely enough for a single person we are also paying unavoidable expenses associated with having a dog. That said I tip when I can but this is not often or on every ride.

    • @Kalleoification
      @Kalleoification 8 місяців тому +6

      Then get out of the industry... evidently you are a law breaker and discrimatory... also in emergencies those services you mention require 24 hour notification in order to utilize

    • @Kalleoification
      @Kalleoification 8 місяців тому

      Still look at ada laws you can't deny rides due to allergies... and 24 hour notice is usually required so emergency rides are not covered

    • @joycethompson5729
      @joycethompson5729 8 місяців тому +1

      ​@lakeshjasarevic4955 that's crazy that you all with service animals aren't receiving supplemental income as well bc it costs to take care of any animal. I guess both sides needs to head to Congress for a better solution.

  • @VVV953
    @VVV953 8 місяців тому +2

    If you have a service animal why not just charge them more

    • @Whitneypyant
      @Whitneypyant 4 місяці тому

      That against federal law

    • @Whitneypyant
      @Whitneypyant 4 місяці тому

      If you charge them more and they report you can be fined up to 10,000

    • @VVV953
      @VVV953 4 місяці тому

      @@Whitneypyant I look at it this way, just because you have a service animal doesn't mean you get to abuse the system

  • @CaesarZheng
    @CaesarZheng 8 місяців тому +17

    But, it does require extra time and money to clean up for the driver. What if the next passenger get allergy from those hair? Sue the driver as well?

    • @latoyajeniques2774
      @latoyajeniques2774 8 місяців тому

      Right!

    • @grazz7865
      @grazz7865 8 місяців тому +1

      This is what you signed up for-public transportation. Get over it or good luck fighting ADA laws.

  • @TheMattman41
    @TheMattman41 8 місяців тому +4

    It takes months and years to get rid of the pet hair. Like I'm supposed to have sneeze attacks for the sake of Any pet or service animal is crazy. I hope a big lawsuit for the drivers come soon.

    • @grazz7865
      @grazz7865 8 місяців тому

      In the words of judge judy-NOT HAPPENING! You’re not fighting ADA laws. All you will get is one serious headache

  • @user-eh2hj8bx6O
    @user-eh2hj8bx6O 8 місяців тому +29

    Kinda shocked that allergies are not an accepted reason to deny dogs because some people can go into anaphylactic shock in the presence of animal fur - hair.

    • @CuriosityQueue
      @CuriosityQueue 8 місяців тому +3

      Surely people with a medical condition as severe as you’ve described could obtain a medical exemption. Anaphylaxis is on the extreme end of the spectrum when accounting for all fur related allergies, and if they fall into said category, they deserve to be excluded. How much of the Uber and Lyft driver population do you believe has such an obscure condition?

    • @spiritualvibrations2825
      @spiritualvibrations2825 8 місяців тому +4

      They should give you an option to accept or deny the ride. The dog needs a car seat with protective padding.

    • @aa777flyer
      @aa777flyer 8 місяців тому +5

      @@spiritualvibrations2825 Its ILLEGAL you cannot deny a service animal.

    • @stevengold
      @stevengold 8 місяців тому +5

      @@aa777flyer So the driver should accept a ride that will give them anaphylactic shock?

    • @tonyolo4591
      @tonyolo4591 8 місяців тому +6

      there is an easy fix if Uber wasn't so greedy. people with dog fur allergies shouldn't even get ride requests from people with service dogs .the app itself is at fault.

  • @Mike__B
    @Mike__B 8 місяців тому +18

    First this is wrong. Second the policy of allergies not being a valid excuse, yet allergies are considered a disability by ADA, I guess one ADA accommodation does not trump another? Third I honestly blame all the people who bring their animals everywhere and claim "emotional support animal" which FYI are not service animals and are not covered under ADA. Lastly, maybe if uber wasn't so cheap and put the onus on the drivers to keep their car clean who they are paying a pittance in wages they perhaps would be more receptive to service animals, I mean throw in free auto-detailing after a certain number of customers doesn't seem unreasonable, after all they are representing your company.

    • @lnancarvis
      @lnancarvis 8 місяців тому +3

      Exactly because some allergies are so bad they can be fatal. That is my one and only plight.

  • @shadiiibrahim9492
    @shadiiibrahim9492 8 місяців тому +2

    I would get out of the car and help them. As a Uber and Lyft driver I would happily without a thought help my passenger get into the car.

  • @missmoth2588
    @missmoth2588 2 місяці тому

    One of my friend's dads was legally blind, He said it was like looking throw a tiny hole. On some days when it was sunny, he could move around the garden and in the house on his own. But if it was dark or low light he couldn't see anything and would need his stick or someone to help him, We couldn't move things in the house or put things down anywhere where he could trip up because he couldn't see his feet. He got a guide dog and then after a few trips out with us and the guide dog he learned to trust he was safe he then would go out on his own with the dog. It gave him life and independence again.
    It breaks my heart when I hear stories of people not being allowed everywhere with their guide dogs.

  • @Grimm5_5
    @Grimm5_5 8 місяців тому +11

    Call a cab. Regular people don’t want dogs in their car especially if they’re afraid of them. Find another way. Don’t blame the driver.

    • @flyoverbill421
      @flyoverbill421 8 місяців тому

      They accepted the responsibility now stand by it and give them a ride.

    • @Grimm5_5
      @Grimm5_5 8 місяців тому

      @@flyoverbill421 you don't listen very well or you're ignorant to how rideshare works but you're going to learn today.

    • @Whitneypyant
      @Whitneypyant 5 місяців тому

      @@Grimm5_5it the same law still applies to Lyft and Uber. That why Lyft and Uber has this policy

  • @marklittle2615
    @marklittle2615 8 місяців тому +2

    I've been driving 5 years and I've never had a problem with a registered service dog.There's no reason to turn any of those down.The are the best behaved animals i've ever dealt with and oftentimes cleaner and better behave than some of the clients

  • @lakeshjasarevic4955
    @lakeshjasarevic4955 8 місяців тому +11

    Firstly, it's not JUST Uber and Lyft. I was just in NYC with my service dog and denied a ride from the airport by several taxi drivers.
    Second, not all service dogs are seeing eye dogs, some are medical alert or for psychiatric disorders.
    Third service dogs are trained not to willfully destroy property (ie. Chewing, scratching, urinating)
    Last and probably most importantly far too many people pass pets off as service animals making it much more difficult for those of us with actual service animals.

    • @almasysephirot4996
      @almasysephirot4996 8 місяців тому +1

      Indeed. And it should be as severely punished as denial of service to persons with disabilities and service animals trained to assist the handler in their disability.

  • @TheMattman41
    @TheMattman41 8 місяців тому +3

    I dont have pets, I do not allow pets in my home or car. What pisses me off is people making a fuse about a pet riding in a person car who does not want pets. It's already bad enough when pet owners get into your car with pet hair all on their clothes. I have very bad allergies and their aren't any laws protecting People rights in their own vehicles.

    • @unboxingcomanapereira
      @unboxingcomanapereira 8 місяців тому

      I m the same way , I don’t wanna pets at all , but they obligate everyone to love their dogs and cat.
      People love more dog than human been it’s annoying me

    • @grazz7865
      @grazz7865 8 місяців тому

      It’s a personal vehicle. There are laws on where you can legally drive it and how (speed limits, etc) but no one can tell you who you can and can’t transport except for illegal cargo (guns, drugs, etc)

  • @JettePorrazzo
    @JettePorrazzo 8 місяців тому +1

    This is happening all over the country! This happens to me multiple times a week I no longer use Uber because it's even worse I just use Lyft but it sometimes takes me four different drivers before someone will actually pick me up with my medical alert service animal who doesn't shed and is very clean.
    I have reported it many times to lyft and even if your drivers have given me negative rating because of my service animal.
    We are located in Nashville Tennessee.

  • @Ronald-hk6fk
    @Ronald-hk6fk 8 місяців тому +13

    They should be obligated to show proof beforehand on the app instead of it being a surprise

    • @mikegollenbusch7067
      @mikegollenbusch7067 8 місяців тому

      Ahh..so drivers can discriminate before they get there..thats awesome

    • @MiiTheProfessa
      @MiiTheProfessa 8 місяців тому

      @@mikegollenbusch7067discriminate how if they don’t want pets in their car they don’t have to Uber needs to create a disability app for this and pay accordingly it’s a lot of drivers like pets I’m sure that would sign up

    • @grazz7865
      @grazz7865 8 місяців тому

      Just fake a breakdown. When the person comes out with the dog, turn the car off, step on the gas to start it (not the brake). “I’m sorry. Cars not working”.

    • @Whitneypyant
      @Whitneypyant 5 місяців тому

      @@MiiTheProfessayou can’t isolate them either

  • @sloppyjoe4017
    @sloppyjoe4017 8 місяців тому +2

    Don't blame the drivers. Blame Uber and Lyft for not compensating the drivers fairly.

    • @grazz7865
      @grazz7865 8 місяців тому

      I can’t understand how you would make any money. Your car, your insurance, your registration, your fuel, your maintenance, your accidents, your mileage, your car payments, your problems. Biggest scam I have ever seen! Uber and Lyft do absolutely nothing. A computer takes the information via the app then assigns a “driver” when someone responds. Uber and Lyft could be a 15 year old kid in his garage!

    • @avgfree21
      @avgfree21 2 місяці тому

      @@grazz7865 You're delusional if you think a 15yr old is running 2 billion dollar companies from a garage

    • @grazz7865
      @grazz7865 2 місяці тому

      @ then explain to me what uber and Lyft actually does?? There are no cars (that the company owns), no dispatchers, no supervisors, no physical locations. It’s just an app on everyone’s phones.

  • @nvptx
    @nvptx 8 місяців тому +1

    Uber Lyft have option to select Pet . Pax deceiving the driver.
    The people that enforce the law should pay for and provide services e for each individual. Not depends on ride share

  • @heyvern
    @heyvern 8 місяців тому +3

    I’ve been driving for 10 years, getting a request from a blind person with a service animal is VERY RARE, it won’t kill you to transport someone and their service animal every blue moon! Also, I gotta say a piece for drivers: it’s not the blind person their denying, it’s the dog because of fear of a mess because Uber/Lyft won’t barely pay anything if a mess occurs. It’s the classic blame and gas light the worker (who barely gets 50% of rides) and not the big corporation behind all this mess.

  • @MarkLeandre-rv3zm
    @MarkLeandre-rv3zm 8 місяців тому +5

    So call a limousine company because you’re paying for that. Uber. Don’t pay enough for that service,they barely make enough for gas now they gotta clean up dog hair and mess

    • @fabulusslife
      @fabulusslife 8 місяців тому

      Exactly!!!!! Bad Enough people will let their kids eat and leave crumbs all over my backseat but the next rider come then give ME A ONE STAR For having a Dirty Vehicle…. That’s when Uber sends me a nasty email about it!!! Driver Lose And No One Cares Because They Got Their Rides, Uber took %65 of the money, I am stuck with a lowered score & a dirty hairy car too clean!!! SMDH

    • @grazz7865
      @grazz7865 8 місяців тому

      I can’t understand how you would make any money. Your car, your insurance, your registration, your fuel, your maintenance, your accidents, your mileage, your car payments, your problems. Biggest scam I have ever seen! Uber and Lyft do absolutely nothing. A computer takes the information via the app then assigns a “driver” when someone responds. Uber and Lyft could be a 15 year old kid in his garage!

  • @jayko23
    @jayko23 8 місяців тому +1

    Its disgusting to deny a rider with a service animal. All you need to do is carry some pet mats so it will make it easier for them to ride and easier to clean afterwards. Im a lyft driver and I have no room for discrimination.

  • @mjohnson116
    @mjohnson116 8 місяців тому +5

    My husband does Uber and Lyft. Drivers who are not set up as uber pet, should not have to allow any dogs in their vehicle. Dog hair, pee, poop be all in the seats and floor. Its not a company car, its people's PERSONAL cars. Yes, uber will pay for the mess up but who wants to clean that many times? Then the next passenger is affected with the odor if there is one etc... maybe rideshare need to look at company cars.

    • @dcarr-kr7hk
      @dcarr-kr7hk 8 місяців тому +1

      @mjohnson116... I agree.

    • @dcarr-kr7hk
      @dcarr-kr7hk 8 місяців тому +1

      @mjohnson116... I agree.

    • @latoyajeniques2774
      @latoyajeniques2774 8 місяців тому +2

      Im not setup for it yet had 2 rides with cats last week 🤦🏾‍♀️ .... no tip @ the end. Thank goodness for the carrier bags I guess

    • @unboxingcomanapereira
      @unboxingcomanapereira 8 місяців тому

      I agree 10000%

    • @grazz7865
      @grazz7865 8 місяців тому

      This is what you signed up for-public transportation. Either get over it or good luck fighting ADA laws.

  • @Funcentric
    @Funcentric 8 місяців тому +8

    Don’t take it personally. No one minds that you’ré blind. It’s the dog they have issue with. Driver’s may have allergies too. Sounds fair. Regardless of law and feelings, it makes sense that drivers don’t want to take animals into their personal vehicles.

    • @eza_ahm
      @eza_ahm 8 місяців тому

      I didn’t pay 50k for a car to be messed up by a dog, fk Uber & Lyft. I won’t comply. 😂

  • @badass1g
    @badass1g 8 місяців тому +21

    As a former Uber driver, who had a bad experience with a blind man, I can honestly say that there should be a premium pay for drivers as it can be a much more challenging service to complete. I picked a guy up and took him to his destination and he screamed at me claiming I was trying to drop him off into oncoming traffic. The guy was a huge asshole! Same with people in a wheelchair. It should pay drivers more. I got a whopping $4 after getting screamed at. So glad I got out of doing rideshare! A lot of risk for little reward. People show up in a wheelchair and I’m expected to not only help them in the car but then fold up this heavy ass chair and pack it in my trunk, only to have them scratch my car as they wheel off from my car. All for $4!!!😅

    • @eza_ahm
      @eza_ahm 8 місяців тому

      Exactly. When I see them, I run off. My cancellation rate it so high that Uber can’t figure out my intentions. Yes. I have given rides to ppl with disability, I have had long discussions with them. I’ve learned from their experiences, but all on my discretion, not coz a criminal corporation wanted me to do so.

    • @khoale803
      @khoale803 8 місяців тому +1

      If someone agrees and performing a job for payment in return, then the individual should do the job at its best. No one forcing anyone to do a job that they do not want. These disability folks can be you or someone in your family, as life has its twisted turn. Be kind and the same will return to you in many ways.

    • @eza_ahm
      @eza_ahm 8 місяців тому +1

      @@khoale803 In this country nothing is for free. Pay the drivers good so they do their job well. U get what u pay for. Drivers ain’t nannies & helpers.

    • @WeirGoi
      @WeirGoi 8 місяців тому +2

      I used to do MetroLyft, which is a service for disabled and elderly people, so I have no problem helping with wheelchairs. But I’m not going to open my doors until you’re at my vehicle. I had one elderly woman with a walker demand that I pull up a bit closer; which I did. Then she demanded that I open my doors before she even got down the ramp and to my car. As a private contractor I don’t have to put up with that nonsense anymore. I canceled her ride because if she’s that angry before the ride, imagine her during and after. Nope! And OP, people in wheelchairs are usually the angriest people on the planet, you should have cancelled the minute you saw the wheelchair.

    • @grazz7865
      @grazz7865 8 місяців тому

      Good luck fighting an ADA law. Public transportation is what you signed up for. Get over it

  • @Living_Despite
    @Living_Despite 8 місяців тому +24

    Rideshare companies need to identify their disabled passengers so they can deactivate those bad drivers.

    • @IcerinAlaska49
      @IcerinAlaska49 8 місяців тому +17

      They aren't 'bad' drivers. The vehicle belongs to the driver, and not the company. Not everyone wants a dog in their own vehicles. And after they transport a dog, they have to clean out their vehicles, which costs time and money. A persons private vehcile that they pay for and are paying the insurance on, doesn't have to transport anyone, or a dog, if they don't want to. I'm not saying isn't crappy for those with service animals, but everyone isn't cool with dog hair being all over their vehicle. Eapecially when the next rider complains about it on their trip.

    • @moreno4u
      @moreno4u 8 місяців тому +10

      @@IcerinAlaska49 Exactly...what if the next driver has allergies....the driver won't get a complaint from the service dog owner, but he will get a complaint from his next rideshare passenger because of the fur/smell left behind. More has to be done to accommodate service dogs, but I don't think the responsibility should fall on the drivers shoulder alone

    • @MiiTheProfessa
      @MiiTheProfessa 8 місяців тому +1

      @@IcerinAlaska49best reply

    • @pablom1147
      @pablom1147 8 місяців тому +3

      Riders should be responsible to bring a blanket to cover the seats, drivers have to clean up dogs hairs after

    • @Living_Despite
      @Living_Despite 8 місяців тому +2

      @@IcerinAlaska49 as a rideshare driver myself I get it. I don't like having to vacuum the hair either. As a rideshare driver per the terms of agreement I agree not to discriminate against those with disabilities. I look forward to my regular exceptional riders who do usually have extra needs such as a dog or wheelchair which requires me to load it. Those are my favorite riders because they're usually are very kind and grateful for the assistance and understanding. You get what you put out in the world. Dogs and disabled riders welcome here.

  • @JeffB-dl4sp
    @JeffB-dl4sp 8 місяців тому +2

    Not just Service Dogs... Wheelchairs too... I've had Drivers refuse to pick up 'Medical Equipment'. You contact Uber, they'll ignore you.

  • @southerngent716
    @southerngent716 8 місяців тому +2

    Anyone defending these drivers, YOU are what's wrong with the world today.

    • @avgfree21
      @avgfree21 2 місяці тому

      The driver signed a contract, if the drivers dont want to take service animals they can switch to doing delivery only

  • @RubenGonzalez-fy1rg
    @RubenGonzalez-fy1rg 8 місяців тому +2

    A big part of this problem is completely not addressed here. Uber drivers pick up passengers with pets who claim they are their service dogs, but they are not. People know that drivers shouldn't deny service dogs a ride and all passengers are required to do is say that thir dog is a service dog. Alot of times dogs are not trained or groomed and leave hair everywhere. Also, dogs urinate and drool on your seats. If the driver has another ride already waiting whats he/she to do? Lose the ride because a cleanup needs to take place? How does the next passenger feel getting into the vehicle that smells bad and is dirty because an untrained pet was in the back seat?
    Shouldn't service dog owners have proof of a registered service animal?

    • @grazz7865
      @grazz7865 8 місяців тому

      I drive buses and yes, they are supposed to have some sort of card that identifies the animal (I have yet to see this card).

  • @leamcandrews3777
    @leamcandrews3777 8 місяців тому +5

    It’s THE reason I stopped driving, along with the poor compensation.

  • @deanna3069
    @deanna3069 8 місяців тому +1

    Hey, Uber drivers they sell dog car covers you can easily put down the seats... I think it is disgusting to turn a handicapped person away.. Hopefully, it's not your family member one day that gets this treatment. I no matter what help the handicapped if possible and PROUD OF IT!! Get a different job if you don't like it!!

  • @b1cf
    @b1cf 8 місяців тому +2

    I have a dog and have dog fur all over my car. When I drove for Uber that day, the customer said he had cancer and can't ride with dog fur because he is allergic. So I guess Uber providing a Dust buster vacuum for all Uber drivers could be a solution.

  • @xBloodxFangx
    @xBloodxFangx 8 місяців тому +1

    This happens to me too, so very often. I cant drive due to my disability and my service dog HAS TO come with me. When I get an uber I text the driver immediately “I have a service dog, is that ok?” Normally they say yes. When they pull up though they say no or “Im allergic” and cancel and drive away. I can go through two or three drivers and usually its the same ones in the area. It takes me an extra two hours to go anywhere. Ive basically just become a shut in cause I cant leave the house… It builds on my depression that I cant get out of the house. Lyft is no better. My service dog is also my profile icon so they can see him instantly.

  • @Pilikoa
    @Pilikoa 8 місяців тому +10

    Contractors can decline a job

    • @grazz7865
      @grazz7865 8 місяців тому

      Fake a breakdown

  • @saraceno1979
    @saraceno1979 8 місяців тому +7

    I have never canceled a ride because of a blind person, or a dog. I have signed for Uber pets.
    It is cultural, Asian and south Asian drivers, especially immigrants who have grown up in other countries do that. According to my Uber clients … and there are many drivers like that.

  • @cassied8892
    @cassied8892 8 місяців тому +2

    I hate to say it, but Uber and Lyft drivers should not be allowed to drive if they are going to deny a passenger who is blind who has a guide dog with them or service animal. I am an Uber driver and I have never ever turned down any animals For a disabled person or not a disabled person it’s still a paycheck to me. Fire Those guys.

    • @latoyajeniques2774
      @latoyajeniques2774 8 місяців тому +1

      That's a bit much.. I drive for both and don't decline those rides but what is ur position when your next passenger has an allergic reaction and wants to sue you? Or you now have to beeline to the nearest er bc they can't breathe? If passengers utilized the UberPet feature and Lyft also added that feature, it would minimize cancelled rides for many.. Oh and the passengers in need NEED to utilize it as well so drivers aren't arriving then canceling. It sux and shouldn't happen but ummm no, why force or threaten ppl into something potentially physically & financially harmful to them?

  • @dlight9849
    @dlight9849 8 місяців тому +1

    The problem is two-fold. First, educate the drivers on the law. Second, people with pets who falsely claim them as Emotional Support Animals which is *not* the same as Service Animal. The law applies to Service Animals only, not to ESAs.

  • @meghanlong3494
    @meghanlong3494 8 місяців тому +3

    as well Uber does not supply and tools or funds to purchase tools for animals to ride in the car. i had to cancel on someone who purchased a two hour ride had a huge dog but no carrier & no blanket. i was driving a rental car with a sign that says i am responsible for a $400 cleaning charge if applicable

  • @mbautista9923
    @mbautista9923 8 місяців тому +3

    Sued them!!!!! We are all equal!!!!! Screw lyft and ubber

  • @chibi_rabbit
    @chibi_rabbit 8 місяців тому +9

    I use uber pet and I've never been denied.

    • @copyprint-fz2hb
      @copyprint-fz2hb 8 місяців тому

      everybody wants to be a victim today , life's not fare , boo-who , meme

    • @mikegollenbusch7067
      @mikegollenbusch7067 8 місяців тому +2

      Because the driver knows before they accept the ride. It's in the story if you pay attention

    • @californianorma876
      @californianorma876 8 місяців тому

      NOT PETS

    • @soliniv1411
      @soliniv1411 8 місяців тому +4

      Because you have common sense to request uber pet, but theres very few of you. Uber pet costs extra so they dont want to pay extra

    • @latoyajeniques2774
      @latoyajeniques2774 8 місяців тому +3

      ​@soliniv1411 it's just like the ppl that select ubershare and get mad when you detour to pick up another passenger. 🤦🏾‍♀️

  • @brianp5205
    @brianp5205 8 місяців тому +16

    The homeless bring their dogs onto the bus every day and quickly state "they're service animals". All 5 of them apparently. Being pulled in a wagon.

    • @roachtoasties
      @roachtoasties 8 місяців тому

      What's your point? Dumb joke.

    • @soliniv1411
      @soliniv1411 8 місяців тому

      ​@@roachtoastiesi think his point is that as long as there are loopholes they will be abused to oblivion

    • @brianp5205
      @brianp5205 8 місяців тому

      @@roachtoasties You are the joke for not understanding.

  • @valeriestribling4054
    @valeriestribling4054 8 місяців тому +3

    Honestly I don’t a person with allergies to be forced to transport animals. I personally don’t have an issue with real service animals. But I worked at Walmart and a “ service animal “ attacked an actual service animal in the store. So get why people don’t want the risk

  • @frankelse745
    @frankelse745 8 місяців тому +11

    Some people are allergic to cats and dogs.

    • @JettePorrazzo
      @JettePorrazzo 8 місяців тому

      You need to read the Americans with disabilities act regarding service animals - please educate yourself

    • @Justnothankyou132
      @Justnothankyou132 8 місяців тому

      ​@@JettePorrazzoAllergies and asthma both all.under the ADA, please read the rules before posting next time, thanks!

    • @JettePorrazzo
      @JettePorrazzo 8 місяців тому

      @@Justnothankyou132 I think you need to re-read it! It actually says that allergies and be allergic to service animal is not a reason to discriminate! In fact you all are a bunch of discriminating a-holes imo
      Rideshare is public transportation! If you don't want to work with the public and provide public transportation regardless of being an independent contractor then you're in the wrong business!
      Can you open yourself up for big lawsuits and fines for refusing to provide service to someone with a service animal!
      I've been a service dog handler since 2006, that makes me the expert.
      People with service animals are not entitled! They are disabled people who are working an independent and want to live their life!

  • @Stephanie-vn6ir
    @Stephanie-vn6ir 8 місяців тому +1

    So, how did these people get around before Uber and Lyft?

  • @Txbear69
    @Txbear69 8 місяців тому +1

    My blind brother and sister-in-law who are both legally blind and rely on Uber and Lyft to get around a lot. And they both have told me about this situation happening to them as well.

  • @charlotteab4606
    @charlotteab4606 8 місяців тому +2

    Let's put this way....uber.lift should localized a pet person to ride passenger..... unfortunately allergy and fear is a issues too...

  • @truckeronabudget.8713
    @truckeronabudget.8713 8 місяців тому

    I did rideshare in detroit michigan and had extra covers and protection for my car to accommodate people with service animals. I also have ver y bad allergies to dogs. The problem is every person with a dog claimed to be a service aninal when they weren't. Many of the passengers were entitled assholes and their dog/ service animal would make a huge mess, shit and shed in my vehicle making it impossible to clean and the next passenger would complain giving me a violation. My allergic reaction caused me to swell up very bad and sneeze uncontrollably. Some passengers woulld mistake this for being high and complain. i'd still perform my job correct and these passengers would still lie after the ride and claim i discriminated against them in someway for a free ride like most passengers I picked up in Detroit. it may be law to accommodate people with disabilities but they should also be responsible for all damage and fees needed to clean and sanitize the car and bring it back to its original condition and not giving a pass to destroy a persons work/personal vehicle. Uber and lyft is the only scenario ive heard of where its ok to destory my property for another person and then be responsible for fixing it.

  • @TheHEROFamily
    @TheHEROFamily 8 місяців тому +1

    If Lyft and Uber were more transparent and notify the driver that the passenger is traveling with a dog then the driver would have the option to accept or not. It's sucks that as a driver you show up only to find out that they have a dog with em. Sure you get an extra 50¢ BUT that doesn't nearly cover the cost to clean the amount of furr they will leave all over my car.

  • @nightshift7963
    @nightshift7963 7 місяців тому

    The fact they say driver allergies is not enough to refuse to carry a dog is all you need to know. That was a one-sided hit piece if you ever saw one.

  • @high63294
    @high63294 8 місяців тому

    The problem is that the rates Uber/Lyft pay the drivers is too low. Many feel to just conplete quick rides with no stops. Having a service animal gets the car dirty with hairs, mostly always, other times the car will stink, i personally dont mind that because i am prepared with cleaning supplies and a small vacuum, however, years ago, normal service (with a service animal as well) used to pay way more than nowadays. If Uber/Lyft would pay a fair wage, this would not happen as much, or not at all. Blame Uber/Lyft and their practices. The same goes if you need a ride to the airport for example, a 20 mile ride might run you 50/60 dollarss and the driver is getting at most 20 with maybe an extra dollar. Such driver pay is also why riders have to wait longer to get a vehicle, such low pay is why the friendly customer service is mostly gone, for drivers to make money, they need to complete as many trips as possible, no time for helping with service animals, no time for extra stops (that do not pay the driver more), no time for anything extra for the driver to do. Make no mistake, this is the companies fault. For anyone that has used this service for years, you know service was much different before than now.

  • @dsan5825
    @dsan5825 8 місяців тому +5

    As somone with a physical disability I can attest to the fact that discrimination is alive and well for all of us.

    • @Justnothankyou132
      @Justnothankyou132 8 місяців тому

      My physical disability is Asthma, set off by pet dander. Cry more please

  • @FlyBoyMT
    @FlyBoyMT 8 місяців тому +1

    The hard part about enforcing these “rules” or “laws” (and why Uber hasn’t deactivated its drivers for it) is because technically none of the drivers are considered employees of the company. They’re all independent contractors using their private vehicles. The only service Uber actually provides is acting as the intermediary to connect the passenger and the driver. When you get in a Lyft or Uber vehicle, your service contract is between you and the driver, and they have their right to cancel the ride for whatever reason. This is only enforced when the drivers are actual employees of the company, using company fleet vehicles, and get paid a salary and issued a W-2 for their work.
    But as a fellow Uber driver, I would suggest those who drive a hatchback/SUV/Minivan and have any last ounce of decency in your heart for disabled passengers with service animals, to line your trunk with protective covering that you can get for a few dollars, and ask that passenger to board their service animal in the trunk. That will keep the animal secure in place in one part of the vehicle rather than it getting all over the upholstery in the seats.

  • @BrianLowe-f9o
    @BrianLowe-f9o 8 місяців тому +2

    I will drive anywhere for anyone for their dogs cats birds fish as long as I'm getting paid I don't care I can always clean my car after the ride !! I live in Tulsa Oklahoma

  • @joegug4751
    @joegug4751 8 місяців тому +3

    There are a lot of foreigners that work for Uber and Lyft that can’t read or speak English. I know for a fact that their family and friends help them with the hiring process. So they have no clue about law of policy. They come to this country hungry and Uber takes advantage of that paying them a low wage so expect more of the same.

  • @sheilamartin9047
    @sheilamartin9047 8 місяців тому +8

    Let them request Uber pet and once the fair is completed, Uber reimburse the customer the additional fee for a service animal. If the customers can show proof that it is a legitimate service animal. And everyone wins.

    • @jessica33313
      @jessica33313 8 місяців тому

      Or it should be a permanent thing on their profile so they don’t have to do it daily

  • @jramos1985
    @jramos1985 8 місяців тому +2

    So who's going to pay for the mess that the dog creates in the car

    • @joycethompson5729
      @joycethompson5729 8 місяців тому

      You as the driver. They don't charge those with service animals.

    • @thomashudson3694
      @thomashudson3694 8 місяців тому +1

      Uber will pay the cleaning fee I've contacted Uber with pictures and stuff after somebody puked in my car they gave me $100 for it to clean up it took me like 5 minutes to clean up the car

  • @MyGoogleYoutube
    @MyGoogleYoutube 8 місяців тому +6

    Upload your service animal paperwork to the company and make Uber pet included.

    • @Kalleoification
      @Kalleoification 8 місяців тому

      @mygoogleyoutube issue is ADA requires no paper work but my state on his license marks him as a special dog...

  • @LightBirdNerd
    @LightBirdNerd 9 днів тому

    People with service dogs are treated so poorly. It’s wrong.

  • @sliedogg
    @sliedogg 8 місяців тому +5

    Yeah cool.. but no dogs in my car.

  • @zaddyghost
    @zaddyghost 8 місяців тому +2

    "It's illegal, you can't say no" Well tell that to my car payment, gas/charge, and insurance 😂. These are just apps that don't provide a car or pay for the car.

    • @lisafreebairn7736
      @lisafreebairn7736 8 місяців тому +1

      Then don't drive for Uber if you are going to discriminate.

    • @Whitneypyant
      @Whitneypyant 4 місяці тому

      Than you can get fine more money than you can afford. ADA doesn’t play when it comes to discrimination. A heard of restaurant having to closed due to denying a service dog

  • @RideShare-mw7fu
    @RideShare-mw7fu 8 місяців тому

    Also provide free cleaning materials to the drivers and a big blanket or sheet to protect the seats from the dogs. the driver is under pay and has to pay from his pocket which is very unfear .

  • @johnurias1348
    @johnurias1348 8 місяців тому

    I used to drive for Lyft, I had rides with service animals in Austin market frequent. The problem I had is rides after having dogs i got reported frequently for having a dirty car and all rides hares expect you to clean right after one ride is unrealistic.
    Why can't rideshare make it to let the driver know in advance service Animal is expected so one's that don't want to handle don't have to handle these awkward moments. Yeah you're right drivers are not suppose to not service. But this brings up another issue, the drivers are independent contractors not employees so technically they can regardless of rules set by companies or they are in non compliance of independent contractor model.
    Also time to make lyft/Uber Ada rides hare program to handle these type of rides and make them employees this will settle issues on all sides.

  • @raphaeligbineweka407
    @raphaeligbineweka407 8 місяців тому +3

    I will never again carry Riders with service, or Pet dogs because Uber does not PAY CLEAN FEE, imagine me carrying a Rider with a dog for a fare of $9, and I ended up spending $28 to detail my car because of the mess caused by the dog, I called Uber, and they told me they don't pay cleaning fee, that it is my responsibility to keep my car clean. So I am sorry, I am not discriminating, but if I get to a Rider, and I see a dog, my apologies, I am cancelling the trip. Nobody is getting a Champagne treatment from me, for the price of a gas station fountain drink. So Riders before getting angry with a driver, always ask the driver how much he or she is getting for the trip, even if a rider pays $60 for a trip, the maximum Uber will give that driver is $22, so I as a driver will give you the $22 service, and definitely a service of $60 you paid. When Uber start paying us cleaning fee for service dogs, then we will start accepting those rides

  • @clxxxiv
    @clxxxiv 8 місяців тому +5

    no one wants dog smell in the car. next customer will not take the uber. if they refuse all animals its not prejudice becuase they refuse animal not the person.

    • @Whitneypyant
      @Whitneypyant 4 місяці тому

      That basically the same thing. And they can get fired and fine up $10,000

  • @uwillnevahno6837
    @uwillnevahno6837 8 місяців тому +2

    Let's report on the outrage of drivers canceling rides on *VISUALLY* impaired people as we don't provide CC for *HEARING* impaired people.

  • @zepyroth.
    @zepyroth. 8 місяців тому +2

    There you go... if people that thinks they are limóns, we have to respect and allowe them to do as they wish... this one will have to be accepted. If not hypocrecy from the goberment.

  • @jamesreese8196
    @jamesreese8196 8 місяців тому +1

    Uber could easily fix this by having uber pet service where they waive the 5 dollar fee for diasabled people, when a dog damages the car uber does nothing

  • @roxannesophia5345
    @roxannesophia5345 4 місяці тому

    For driver's who rent their Uber/Lyft vehicle from Hertz ot Avis, the rental agreement prohibits pets of any kind in the vehicle. If a driver transports a pet the car rental companies charge a fine. Some drivers just can't transport a pet even if they wanted to

  • @hollydugal5299
    @hollydugal5299 4 місяці тому

    This shit needs to stop. It’s gotten out of hand. If having a service dog or service animal goes against your religious beliefs or using the “I’m allergic to service animals excuse.”, then you should not be working in the transportation industry.

  • @dcarr-kr7hk
    @dcarr-kr7hk 8 місяців тому +1

    That is their right.
    I would not want a door in my car -- regardless!!

    • @xBloodxFangx
      @xBloodxFangx 8 місяців тому

      Then you can be fired from working at uber

  • @brittnejon9719
    @brittnejon9719 8 місяців тому

    Im a driver and I was all for picking up riders with dogs but Ive notice their dogs leave alot of hair and bad smells in my truck. Its not worth the hassle of cleaning up after. Some of the dogs hair wont come out and the smell makes the next rider uncomfortable. I just unchecked the pet option.

    • @Whitneypyant
      @Whitneypyant 4 місяці тому

      You realize that service dogs aren’t pets right? Even if you unchecked the pet option you still by your contract that you signed with Lyft or Uber require to take service dogs. Service dogs are considered medical equipment. They can detected when your sugar low and they detected when are about to have seizure. Yea they aren’t pets

  • @alanbyrne8578
    @alanbyrne8578 8 місяців тому

    I drove Uber and and you have the option to chose to accept dogs or not. When you do it pays maybe $2 more. The problem is that some people take advantage and the don’t order Uber pet and they get in your car and say it’s only a small dog or it’s a service dog. How does a driver know what service dog this is for. Not all people are blind. Some people have hidden disabilities. I’ve had people get in my car and the ride does not say Uber pet and then they tell me it’s a service dog. According to Uber I am not supposed to question someone. In the end I just turn Uber pet off,as I have had dogs piss in my car. There is always a ton of hair left on the back seat when they leave and then another rider gets in the car and says, don’t you clean your car. It’s not as easy as it appears. This story makes sense but in the big picture it’s very one sided. The lady keeps saying it’s a service dog but dogs shed hair and can piss, sh,t, fart etc. The drivers are leaving because they don’t want a dog in the car. It does not matter that it’s a service dog it’s still a dog.

  • @Lazaromendez131Azteca
    @Lazaromendez131Azteca 8 місяців тому

    As a service animal owner I understand to pay five dollars extra they need to clean up the car ,they need to pick up more passengers

  • @nbaoldgirl
    @nbaoldgirl 8 місяців тому +2

    If I were an Uber driver I’d only want to take fares with service animals/pets.

    • @MiiTheProfessa
      @MiiTheProfessa 8 місяців тому +1

      Well tell them to create an app where u and others who willingly want to will

    • @nbaoldgirl
      @nbaoldgirl 8 місяців тому

      @@MiiTheProfessaI’ll tell them

  • @miroyuki
    @miroyuki 8 місяців тому +4

    They are not denied the services because of their disability, they are denied the ride because of the dog. Uber/Lyft drivers should have the right to decide if they want pets/service animals in their cars. Also, pay the extra fee if you need your service animal.

    • @lisafreebairn7736
      @lisafreebairn7736 8 місяців тому

      Charging extra is an ADA violation because it is a form of discrimination.

    • @miroyuki
      @miroyuki 8 місяців тому

      @@lisafreebairn7736 we need to be considerate and also think about the drivers car. The service to the disable is not the issue, the issue is that the car owner will have to be the one to clean it up (not cool).

    • @Whitneypyant
      @Whitneypyant 4 місяці тому

      @@miroyukithat is exactly the issue.

  • @boba1470
    @boba1470 8 місяців тому

    The problem is not actual service dogs. It’s the entitled people that saying their dog is a service dog when it’s not even an emotional support dog that’s the problem.

  • @Apacheuncovered
    @Apacheuncovered 5 місяців тому

    The second a passenger tells me I have to do something I would speed off too.

  • @stevebear1932
    @stevebear1932 8 місяців тому

    1. It is the government's fault! 2. All service animals MUST be issued ID cards with dogs and owners' names! 3. All disabled owners must be issued special ID cards by DMV that they are disable and accompanied by dogs. 4. All owners must present those cards when they ask to when they are entering any business. Including any transportation. There is nothing discriminating there! It's better for all disabled people. 5. Dogs and only dogs must be registered as service animal! No other animal can do what a trained dog can do. All that BS with snakes, lizards, parrots, pigs, hamsters, etc, as service animals MUST be STOPPED! And stopped by the federal government once and for all! No court should accept any cases from the owners of any animal for not getting permitted to enter if it is not approved service animals.
    And another thing. There are special transportation vans that exist for disabled people with plenty of spaces inside where dogs can sit on the floor. Why do the service animal owners not hiring them? Why are drivers' health issues not taken into consideration? Why do drivers should lose time, even day, and money to clean their own vehicles after giving a ride to service dogs? Aren't drivers humans too? Aren't drivers have rights? Until all the above issues are not fixed as such, we will have what we have.
    P.S. Will you take a seat on the seat covered with a dog's hair? I won't.

  • @tangoangel2782
    @tangoangel2782 8 місяців тому

    What if the driver is allergic? Or the next passenger is allergic???
    What if you are going to a business meeting and show up in dog hair? No one can force anyone to do a service. What they should do, is have indications in the app, that matches the rider with only drivers, who are willing to do so.

  • @RideShare-mw7fu
    @RideShare-mw7fu 8 місяців тому

    The second lady , has 2 dogs. and she is complaining. Pay the drivers more money.

  • @francislee7770
    @francislee7770 8 місяців тому

    What if a driver has a disability too like a severe allergic reaction to cats and dogs?

  • @tangoangel2782
    @tangoangel2782 8 місяців тому

    A fear of dogs is not a legitime excuse??? What???! I am sorry, but this is ridiculous. This can be traumatizing for the driver, trigger PTSD or get them all into an accident if the dog moves and the driver reacts badly on the wheel, spooked. Ridiculous.
    There should be a system that links those riders to only drivers who are dog friendly, to not waste everyone’s time.

  • @unboxingcomanapereira
    @unboxingcomanapereira 8 місяців тому

    As far as I know if you fight with dogs you pay for it , why don’t pay driver extra to clean the car after the trip?