When he's fighting the 3rd Evil Ex, in the alley, there's a trash can with a 33 painted on. I wonder if this was intentionally to reference how many takes it took knowing that it would be on the blooper reel. Depends on what order these scenes were shot. Buuuut, the 3's could just be a theme at this point in the movie as the 3rd Ex also wears a 3 on his shirt. I like to think it was a Pumpkins reference to the song 33. How coincidental that the package scene took the same amount of tries. So would the number on the can be different if he had made on a different number of tries.
I love how many times the book landed in the same place right in front of the can like if they could have moved it and re-shot the scene it would have been so much faster.
michael put a gun to stephen spielburg's head and forced him to do the scene without a jump cut. he threatened to kill his family if he didn't make the shot.
Aaah, throw no. 15 was so close! 0:30 Incredible how Michael managed to get the package to have the same trajectory over and over again. Like come on, adjust it a little bit! :P P.S. Thanks to this I discovered MEW is extremely patient.
Alex in film making you don't necessarily know what goes out of frame and what doesn't until editing. The director will have a series of shots in mind but lots of things change in the editing room.
this is why i don't know if this movie is any good or not, wtf is up with people's interpretations of this movie? why do people either hate it or love it??
![SCOTT PILGRIM VS. THE WORLD (2010) First Fight Scene [HD] Michael Cera](/img/n.gif)
He delivered the line the SAME EXACT WAY every time, magic
+Lily so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?so, yeah, eight o'clock?
+cristobal gonzalez LOL
acTING
It's almost like he's a professional actor with 90 acting credits in a career spanning 20 years.
I'm pretty sure it's a recording. They're just trying to get the shot.
It's so fitting that Michael Cera would undershoot the can. It totally fits his character in the movie.
Yeah, the character of Michael Cera
he’s not real
@@rickpickle2882 I think that's why he said the character in the movie
leaving this whole thing in would have gone perfectly with the rest of the movie
When he's fighting the 3rd Evil Ex, in the alley, there's a trash can with a 33 painted on. I wonder if this was intentionally to reference how many takes it took knowing that it would be on the blooper reel. Depends on what order these scenes were shot. Buuuut, the 3's could just be a theme at this point in the movie as the 3rd Ex also wears a 3 on his shirt. I like to think it was a Pumpkins reference to the song 33. How coincidental that the package scene took the same amount of tries. So would the number on the can be different if he had made on a different number of tries.
this comment was from 3 years ago but sadly 334 likes 😞
@@embe.rthis comment was made 3 days ago
I love how many times the book landed in the same place right in front of the can like if they could have moved it and re-shot the scene it would have been so much faster.
It’s about the angle tho, the trash can is supposed to be closer to the camera while they look farther away, like a comic book frame
and that's why you aren't a cinematographer lol
doing practical stuff like this makes working on a set way more fun
That was VERY consistent, I don't see why they didn't just shift the trashcan and camera up a few inches...
No.
that's what i've been saying for 10 years
Cause that’s not real art
why is the holy fuck did they not just move the can like 6 inches up. he hit that like 12 times
To be loyal to the comic.
This doesn't happens in the comic.
sarcasm, dude... sarcasm.
Because it's a movie. They set up that framing because it looked the best. Things in movies are rarely made on a whim, every frame is planned.
at what point do they move the trash can a little closer since it hits the same spot everytime
?
Right!
so yeah, the legend said that Michael Cera still throwing the box into the can
michael insisted on getting this shot and throwing it in the trash can even though in the actual movie they still used a jump cut
What?
michael put a gun to stephen spielburg's head and forced him to do the scene without a jump cut. he threatened to kill his family if he didn't make the shot.
I just checked. They cut back to a close up for the line, but the over-the-shoulder basket is all one shot.
@@happypandaface710 I'm pretty sure...I'm pretty sure that didn't happen if that did he would be in jail
@@ianmckinleyanderinulmersid4579 michael cera has dirt on high level government officials to skirt the law in ways to feed his trick shot fanaticism
I love this movie to death.
"How are you doing that with your mouth?"
"Never ⬛ mind how I'm doing it!"
and I thought they had done that with CGI
me too!!!
Damn if only they couldve moved the trashcan slightly closer to him, that wouldve been the perfect spot!!
I adore that he keeps under shooting it and then by take 30 they clearly skootched the can up a bit XD
Worth it, the joke was amazing :D
Aaah, throw no. 15 was so close! 0:30
Incredible how Michael managed to get the package to have the same trajectory over and over again. Like come on, adjust it a little bit! :P
P.S. Thanks to this I discovered MEW is extremely patient.
Wow, the same line over and over again 33 times.
welcome to acting
why did nobody tell him he was throwing it at the exact same spot
He's no Sigourney Weaver, that's for sure.
People who are saying why couldn't they just move the trashcan closer, because that's the placement and composition of the shot they wanted.
Acting is hard:)
That's Hollywood, buddy. That's Hollywood.
I assumed they just did the standard movie trick where a guy over the camera catches it and drops another book in the trash.
"So the camera wasn't recording, we need to do one more time"
0:50 "imagine if that went in and we drop the pen?" xD LOL
Scott Pilgrim vs. The Trash Can
SOMEONE JUST MOVE THE CAN CLOSER OMG!!!
since the book goes out of frame anyways, why not throw it to someone out of frame and have someone else drop another copy from up above, right?
Exactly what i was thinking
Cuz that would be cheating and we dont take kindly to cheaters
now now, he wasn't bothering nobody skeeter.
Alex in film making you don't necessarily know what goes out of frame and what doesn't until editing. The director will have a series of shots in mind but lots of things change in the editing room.
No.
Michael Sera is so humble that it pains him to overshoot a mark.
Well, he's no Sigourney Weaver...
why are you saying that?
darktoto95 In Alien Resurrection, Ripley shoots a basketball over her shoulder and Sigourney Weaver was able to make the shot in one take.
huntcd2012 waow, i'll search that on youtube thanks! (Sigourney
So what?
This video is the most scott pilgrim video as well lmao
This is what I miss from movies
Was waiting for this scene in the anime.
Rumor is, when they tried to do it in the anime, it took over a hundred times to work.
Dude perfect
That's not actually a book, it's a Blu-Ray copy of Hot Fuzz.
The first one hit the rim
So yeah, 8 o’clock?
Find yourself a girl with that much patience.
JUST MOVE THE BIN
I suppose it makes sense MEW is kinda jaded in this movie considering she had to sit (stand) through this...
poor packages =( so many got hurt while shooting this scene
WHY DIDNT THEY JUST MOVE THE BIN
At this point they would have made it in 8 o'clock for failing many times
In what time does he throw it good?
*SO YEAH,8 O' CLOCK?*
What's bad in it?
mf rlly said hooray
Anyone else here because of the shorts guy
Scott Pilgrim versus Physics
i wondered if people that can use a computer knew what the definition of the word wondered is... guess i know now
i wondered how many takes that took
Me trying to attempt trick shots XD
"I wondered", as i was wondering how many takes that took.. now i do... Not "I wonder".. god.. 44 people didnt see that one?
i assume matthew patel disliked this
And I thought they did it with CGI...
No a la violencia contra los paquetes!
lmao. If only they just moved the trashcan a bit forward. he was pretty consistent in the 20s
i have the movie but it's the block buster version
They could've just moved it an inch closer
I can't believe Michael Cera had to do that 33 times just to get the package in the trashcan! #EPICFAIL
+Mike Awesome yeah it was funny
You would thing they would move the box a bit closer no?
Looked like a heater was on the ground there.
Moving it closer would have Michael overthrow it. It would have been out there after they determined how far he could throw it within shot.
paddyjoedoonin
move it forward but dont tell him then
@@TheSimmr001 No.
jaja shit that was funny
33...
So?
they didn't really have to go through all this. they could have done the same thing tiktokers do
me repites ese numerín?
Here cause Edgar Wright
Obviously
Lol
XD
Why didn't they just move the box 6" closer?
Thank you, captain obvious.
Ripley only needed one take for the basketball scene in Alien 4.
Ripley > Scott Pilgrim.
No.
Ok?
No.
si lo hubieran hecho ahora apuesto a que habrian usado cgi :/
+elrincondeemily2 La pelicula está llena de CGI...
eso ya lo se,me refiero a que lo hubieran usado hasta para algo tan tonto como eso
elrincondeemily2 Bueno, a veces los efectos prácticos son mejores que el CGI, aparte es un costo menos
No es por pasion, simplemente no era redituable usar CGI para algo tan vanal. Ademas, la pelicula es reciente.
@@Ebvardh La película es genial, nmms xd (Y no me importa que el comentario sea de hace 3 años).
The package dislike the video
Fail
No.
The most overrated movie ever.
dhrdan BLASPHEMY
"i don't like it. Must mean it's overrated."
Fuck you dhrdan if that is your real name
this is why i don't know if this movie is any good or not, wtf is up with people's interpretations of this movie? why do people either hate it or love it??
Something Seems Off Just watch it. It's glorious.