Not really a secret - change your title it’s very much bait and manufactured drama. It’s totally ok to not declare everything in business - it can give you competitive advantage and i think the UK guitar industry needs all the support it can get… you go Lee and company!!!
Victory amps are moderately priced new. Used you can find some great deals. I was on the fence between Victory and Friedman. In the end the Friedman did more for me and was the Keeper.
Funnily enough I always thought that Victory was an in-house brand from Andertons, I think I got that idea because of body language and tone when they talked about it, it was like "well, this feels more like an add than usual"
Same here. I always kind of had the feeling, given the tone Lee, Rabea, Rob, and Pete would always take with the amps, and the fact that they were the signature artist for the amps, that Victory was an Andertons house brand. I don't like that Lee wont disclose fully his role in the company, and would play a semantics game to seemingly avoid it, but I do understand Lee not seeing himself as a large enough part of the company to note if he is in fact greatly divorced from the operations of the brand.
Yep. A rabbit hole not worth jumping into. The time to scour the web for info on the subject would probably be better spent on enriching one's personal life, and the family and friends around them. In the grand scheme of life, it's absolutely meaningless. I wish KDH had music to share. I like music😁
@@patrickkish6662well good news we have someone covering it so we don’t have to do any of the leg work 😂 and I personally do find it interesting and entertaining to watch this stuff. Reminds me they are all trying to make a buck off of us 🤷🏽♂️
Disclosing brand deals or ownership (no matter how small) must happen when influencers bring product onto their channel. This was drilled into the heads of all influencers ages ago but there still seem to be the remaining few that try to duck and dodge it.
Personally, I felt there was significant shade and drama - I don't have a dog in this fight mind you, but i definitely felt the tone was very provocative. The way it came across to me was "I'm going to be snappy and condescending for nearly a half hour at Lee Anderton, even tho when I directly asked him he said 'yup I'm part owner'".
@@afaella3 Lee made a bunch of videos promoting Victory's products without disclosing that relationship. That is misleading. That he came clean when directly asked about it does not change that he misled the public in the first place. Frankly, Lee had no other choice but to disclose when directly asked, as lying about it is a criminal offence. Pointing out that someone is potentially breaching advertising ethics isn't "shade and drama", it's providing the consumer with important information. This video resulted in Lee admitting something he hadn't made sufficiently clear to customers beforehand. I don't see why you're running interference on behalf of a business owner who got caught breaching advertising ethics. Lee isn't paying you to do his PR. Do you think businesses shouldn't be required to disclose relevant relationships when promoting products? That's a difficult stance to defend.
I have to disagree with everyone else's comments and I will explain why. This video and its contents is 'MEh Meh and Meh again'. This video for no good reason whatsoever is having a dig at Lee of Andertons, simply to get views and likes for his 'UA-cam' channel. 62k views = about $60 dollars? Don't spend it all at once.... Completely pointless video, all that is going on is, (you might have heard of this term?)' 'Marketing'. So what if Lee does not 'disclose', every single company he is involved in. If Mr Andertons was using a company as a cover, to import Columbian finest white powder. You would have a story but this is just Meh, and pointless. In the Uk for years Jhs, (not Josh the other one based in the uk), had a magazine in music shops that advertised their own gear, and of course, gave it glowing reviews. No one gave two dumps about that, and no one should really give the same about this video and its contents.
@@james1658KAAY, Lee’s burner account. Stop being so butthurt. You’re obviously in the minority here. These are the type of videos that are liked and shared, thus growing the channel. Keep a close eye on KDH’s subscriber count over the next month and get back to me on whether he’s gained or lost followers.
@@james1658 I'm sorry, if this is how you do marketing in the UK then you are breaking the law. This is a story that evolved out of a question that MANY people in the industry and consumers of these products have asked MANY TIMES. That question was simply, "Who owns Victory?". The fact that Andertons came up was not a fabrication for views. It was part of the answer that was hidden underneath our noses. I'm sure you are a fine person but I can't help but entirely disagree with your sentiment and your point of view.
The worst part is private label products like this are common place in the industry; a way music stores can offer lower prices on low end gear by cutting out brands and pulling straight from the distributor. It also helps with offering accessories and products as add-ons in sales to increase margins. Michell, Proline, Gamma, Delta Lab(the pedals), Live Wire, Harbinger are all Guitar Center Brands. Musician's Gear, and Rouge were Musician's Friend. Sam Ash had Micheal Kelly, and Samson. and Mars had a bunch too that I can't remember. This is common and only shady when you hide it.
The Landlord one really surprised me. As far as I know, they never acknowledged being a part of that, while also liking them very vocally. That sounds very dubious to me unfortunately.
I’ll never forget I once bought a landlord pedal from andertons that turned out to be faulty and I just wanted to return it, not swap for a non faulty unit. The rep actually tried to convince me to swap it as “It works out better for us if we just exchange tone city stuff”. Which gave me 2 impressions. 1) Respectfully, I don’t give a shit what “works out better for you”, give me my refund 😂 and 2) “Oh, so Landlord pedals are just rebranded tone city circuits”. Not a slight on Landlord though, I’ve used a lock-in tuner for ages, great little unit.
@@BaBaBaBenny Tone City, Landlord, loads of those in-house brands are exactly the same pedals. Just rebranded for their respective retailers. Same goes for most of the Aliexpress pedals and a lot of the other cheap mini-pedals on the market.
Great video. What’s weird is that Lee could have gone the exact opposite direction with his disclosures and garnered a lot of interest and respect. “I have access to some of the best ears and fingers in the UK, I’m an expert in guitar products, my team and I have played virtually every guitar amp ever made, yada yada” and made this a selling point, rather than a secret.
Had he been honest from the start, there would be no problem. Now he has a ten year history of hiding his conflict of interest. His credibility is gone.
It could be the other partners wanted his involvement secret on the vids to get a buzz going and he played ball. Maybe a hard one to admit to after ten years.
I've always thought Lee or Rob had their hand in Victory amps in some way after watching a lot of their videos. I was curious about them when I last needed a new amp but went with something else.
I mean, I guess it was dubious. But, as KDH points out, the law is very clear and communication on such matters has to be crystal clear. Even if the assumption is an obvious one to make, you still have to disclose such things.
I absolutely didnt think that. I just thought that Victory is a young team of guys that is heavily betting on the youtube game with abdertons because they are just friends
I gotta say KDH, When I first started watching your videos a while back I was like "man this guy hates everything". (I am laughing while I write this). But as time has marched on, I realized that you are the hero we need. I love your content keep up the great work.
You know, leeches are pretty disgusting little creatures, but they can be useful time to time, heroes for some, parasites for others, so is KDH. And if there is no new YT drama, just invent your own, right? Just some toughts for the internet moral police... LOL
KDH, you have a very bright future. Smart, young, and driven. We are watching you grow up right in front of us and you're doing great. Never lose sight of your goals. Remain humble and never compromise your own integrity.
One thing I really like about you KDH, is even when you have dirt on somebody, you don't belittle them for it. You are always straightforward with the facts, and forward about the ethics on why you are doing it, without outright attacking anybody's character. It really allows me to trust your work more as it doesn't seem like a way to mindlessly stroke your ego about being right, but because you actually care about getting to the bottom of these issues.
@@FlyingCircusAct dirt is a pretty vague word when used like this. In this case I’m just meaning potential drama. But KDH doesn’t make it any worse than it already is by adding any more drama, he respectfully brings to light consumer issues in an incredibly professional way. This is genuine journalism and I was just being a bit hyperbolic for brevity.
@@WeyounSix I appreciate your honesty, extremely rare in todays world. I’m still left wondering where the issue lies, is there pending litigation with this? Something “shady” going on? From what I’ve witnessed, Lee’s fair across the board with amp reviews and the like. Not sue what I’m missing.
@@FlyingCircusActThe issue is that as an influencer you need to be transparent about where your interest lies. We all know he has a vested interest in Andertons and the channel is there to sell products from his shop. No issues there. What we didn’t know is that he is part owner of Victory a brand that he pushes continuously over other amp manufacturers. People watch that and assume it’s unbiased as he sells all of them anyway. Whet he’s not saying is that he also has a vested interest in that brand and it’s market share, therefore it’s not an unbiased opinion but one made as the owner of that company who stands to make money from the sale of Victory no matter where you buy them from.
i'm pretty sure we already knew Andertons owned Victory? Like i was already sure of it for some reason? They must have mentioned it when the amps were first coming out, also at the start they basically only made amps for Rob Chapman, so i guess i had this narrative in my mind that Martin Kidd started making amps for Rob and then Lee bought the company to develop the brand, or something like that, anyway they are undeniably great amps at pretty great prices, so in the end, who cares?
I have definitely seen Lee in an Andertons video from a few years back mention that he had an involvement in Victory, I remember it as he just mentioned it in passing and my ears pricked up thinking ''well you've never mentioned that before''. Not really a problem but something to bear in mind when they are pushing Victory products.
Really? Can you share the videos? I don't think I've heard him say anything about any involvement with the brand. But I haven't watched every video. But KDH couldn't find anything either. I mean, other than being friends or helping in development or whatever.
Yeah he had involvement, he would give advice and be asked his opinion on products. He compared speaker cabinets etc. "Involvement" and "part ownership" are quite different though.
@@mrcoatsworth429 Now you're asking... it was just a passing remark in one video, as I recall he was kind of 'off set', hand held camera 'behind the scenes' sort of stuff, pointing out a Victory prototype in the corner of the room, I think a 'work in progress' for a potential signature for Rob or Rabea. What he said wasn't a 'we're working with them' kinda thing, it was definitely something inferring that Andertons had a stake in Victory. As I said, that's why my ears pricked up and since then it's always been in the back of my mind when they feature Victory Amps. It was only a five second bit in a video maybe 3-4 years ago. Good luck finding it!
@@mrbrick5907 Thanks! Well, I'm not about to look for it myself haha Now we know what his involvement is. But what do you mean by "now you're asking..." At what other time should I have been asking?
This has absolutely become my favorite guitar channel. It's so refreshing to hear calm and articulate news about the industry. It's like a high-gain channel for grownups. No prattle at 100 mph, editing out the pauses and saying "bruh" every 20 seconds. Sweet Jebus, please keep doing what you're doing \m/
Just as an FYI. GAP isn’t Andertons. It’s a distribution company owned and run by the owners of Guitarguitar, Andertons and PMT (GAP is an acronym of their companies) so that they could have more buying power on certain products. They realised they could make more margin on cheaper products instead of going through companies like Stagg. Companies like Eastcoast and TourTech exist only for this purpose. You’ll notice only these three companies sell these brands. Great investigating though.
I hope someday Lee can own all the companies. Maybe after Lee owns all the companies Dave Grohl can do all the music and the two can control the entire global music scene.
I actually had already thought Victory was an Anderton’s house brand but I can’t recall why. The whole UK gear manufacturing and retail industry is a very small circle
EXACTLY! This kind of weird "i gotcha" shit is not really warranted here. It's so unbelievably small and informal. Hence why Lee refers to them as the guys at Victory. The reason why he talks about Victory that way is because he FEELS that way. Instead of bleating "I OWN THIS BRAND GUYS" (or something far more reasonable) before playing something on one, he shows respect to the guys who DO run Victory's day-to-day shit and apply their awesome knowledge. I assume, at least partially, that the reason why Lee refuses to see himself as equal with them is because of that HUMAN dynamic. KDH, you're too rigid in how you're seeing this. Brand presentation, rigid assumptions about many things without self-reflecting on your own demands. How do you think the guys at Victory who are responsible for the hard work to create the product itself (the focus should be on who makes it in terms of HANDS ON THE PRODUCT) feel about this guy blasting that he is the owner? You need to think more critically KDH. There is nuance to these things. There's a lot more with the whole brand identity thing and I don't want to type up a whole storm about it.
@@JR_Taylor Think more, meaning critically attack your own position and/or try to build up Lee's so you can see more and find the correct conclusion by rocking back and forth between the practices to arrive at a more rounded understanding by settling between the two extremes. I don't think my position is extreme, there are valid reasons to reduce transparency on certain things because as buyers, we don't think in terms that are conducive to logical conclusions. Everyone suffers from this, that's what Lee was trying to say about the pedals being blindfolded. There's nothing secret or shady about this, it's how the consumer mind works
I’ve always thought of Victory being synonymous with Anderton’s, this video just confirms it. Either way, they’re killer amps and I do like Lee (his public persona at least).
@@Thatdudeoverthere69420I’m sure we’ve all met a ceo much worse than Mr Lee. He’s a great guy who’s managed to accomplish the impossible task of taking over the family business and bringing it into the modern age
@@Thatdudeoverthere69420 Yeah I got the vibe that he just didn't mention it and then felt weird bringing it up rather than being malicious ... still makes them very untrustworthy. Stupidity isn't an excuse in cases like this.
Hey KDH. The following brands are legally affiliated with either Lee or Andertons. Ive also included the gross profit margins on products when sold via Andertons. Tone City Pedals - 70-80% Landlord FX Pedals - 70-80% Chapman Guitars - 35-45% Burns Guitars - 30-40% Tourtech - 50-90% Stagg - 50-80% Faith Guitars - 30-45% Eastcoast Guitars - 45-55% Victory Amps - 35-50% There are probably more, but this is what can be remembered. Source- Ex Andertons employee.
@@JamesMears76 he uses ThorpyFx to help design some Victory pedals (but only because Dan Coggins is a ThorpyFX employee, not because Adrian has any talent whatsoever). Otherwise he'd employ Coggins directly and not deal with the secretly most hated man in FX pedals.
@@ghalsor the signature Rabea and Danish Pete signature pedals, sold for £44.99 were purchased by Andertons for £8.31 a unit. If you bought both, you got a "free" power supply and daisy chain. The plug was £1.10, the daisy chain was £0.51 (normally retailing at £9.99 and £4.99 respectively). So you'd pay £89.98 for £18.23 worth of product. That applies to any and all Tone City mini-pedal deal.
I've noticed your appearance of health has been diminishing with each video. It's about the music, and your mental and physical well being. Think about it, KDH. You're not posting videos of yourself playing. Music is about the song. Not the politics of product production. Think about it as you investigate the image in the mirror
he seems to be in a pretty good shape in my opinion .. and I guess his choice, as a musician, is to not only show him play, but to inform us on what's happening in that industry which is living and existing because of us, consumers, who are buying their gears ... sometimes based on lies and false reviews unfortunately ... KDH work is tremendous, extremely valuable and we should thank him for that.
Well done. The Martin Kidd interview at the 4:22 mark actually tells a whole bunch when the real story is known. Martin cleverly pivots when he seems to realize that he might accidentally reveal the well-kept ownership secret.
As someone who, years ago, quit my job as a daily newspaper writer over a matter concerning integrity, honesty, and what I was and was not allowed to write about something, I appreciate your investigative integrity and tenacity in attempting to get to the bottom of things and then not being afraid to say it regardless of what people will and will not conclude. I've really nothing against Andertons as a business, however, unlike a lot of people, I've never been much of a fan of their videos; they've always come across as a bit cliquey to me, so it was interesting to find, as a result of your investigative efforts here, that there is apparently something more substantial in terms of ownership and interests to that cliquey feeling than just my personal perception. And with regards to ASA standards breaches, as well as having been a news writer in the past, I also worked in advertising for a number of years. So I can tell them from a position of some personal experience that they really do need to get on that and correct things not merely as a matter of integrity, but also to avoid some potential fines and other punitive measures, because the ASA does actually have some teeth when it comes to things like that.
I don't think any standards are being broken - Lee is an investor in Victory as a private individual, not the store, and the videos are the product of the store (which he happens to own as a separate entity). Is there a conflict? Yes, but it is hardly a scandalous one - see my comment, this is a niche industry dealing in pretty small money values, so raising capital is very hard and this sort of arrangement is very common. Let me put it this way - if Lee's involvement in Victory, as one of 9 owners and the primary dealer, is £100k, but his involvement in Andertons where his is the principal is, say, £5million, then I can see why he doesn't really see it as a conflict, and why he always says "those guys at Victory". He doesn't see his minor-to-him financial investment as being a big deal. He also doesn't see much return on that compared to what he sees from, say, Chapman (whose value is only £250k, by the way - did I mention that this is a NICHE industry?).
@@MrLivebynight If you have to hide your ownership of companies you review, then it's obviously a hopelessly dishonest position. The dude proved he has no personal integrity by sticking to keeping his personal ownership role for 10 years under wraps as he tried to give his investment a boost with his "unbiased" rave reviews. That is about as obvious an example as you can have, of a completely biased individual who knows how little credibility glowing reviews of a company from one of it's owners are afforded. So in other words, he understands his own bias very well and how that appears to consumers, hence decided to hide it, and he can't pretend it was a moment of weakness, since he continued to cover it up as he ran a stealth promotion campaign for them disguised as unbiased reviewer comments, publicly for a decade. It wasn't a decision to lie once, but to hide the truth as ongoing policy, from the intended audience (amp shoppers), to influence their buying behavior towards the only behavior that was going to boost his portfolio of business holdings; for a decade. He hid the truth as he was later forced to admit and made a pathetic excuse for, to make people believe he wasn't involved, because he wanted his promotions to be mistaken for unbiased reviews from a brand fan with no personal stake in whether people responded by purchasing or not. Does honesty mean nothing to you, that even legal standards aren't low enough; you have to excuse the lies of someone who can't even manage to muster up the personal integrity to stay on the right side of advertising laws?
@@Gregorypeckory Perfect summation of the situation. Clearly Anderton lied by omission in every Video with a Victory amp in it. He must have considered that before the cameras rolled, every time. Chose not to be honest. I think it's pretty serious stuff. The other amp makers featured in those videos should seriously consider their relationship with andertons. The videos have to be treated as biased.
Kinda unrelated to the video, but your story gave me major flashbacks. I used to have a little blog reviewing things from time to time and when I was at uni I got a gig as a content writer for a review site. I wasn’t studying journalism or anything and it didn’t pay much, but given my only other income was stocking freezers at a supermarket twice a week and repairing gameboys to sell on eBay it was very appreciated! They were also pretty patient with me as I was very green - I had to learn real basics of professional reviews like you can’t say it’s bad, you have to say it’s stronger in other areas or find a positive on the back of a downside, the top 5 shootouts, etc that get more traction and mean you can say x is great for y, a great for b, etc and avoid saying directly ‘this is pants’. That was all kind of okay, I learnt to play the game - you’re selling ad space and advertisers don’t want any beef, they might even be suppliers of products you’ll be reviewing in a different article, plus if you say everything’s crap people stop giving you stuff, and not a lot of places can afford to buy all their review products and turn a profit. It is what it is - I think most people understand; it’s kinda like the 5 star rule right? If it’s a professional product review or a coffee shop eating on google, the scale doesn’t really go from 0-5, it goes from 4.0-5.0. But then I ran into one company I just couldn’t review. Every time I reviewed a product it’d get bounced back to me and they were not accepting anything other than glowing reviews. I read reviews other had read for the site and it was all the same and this just went on and on. I’m actually keeping the product field and publication under wraps because this is going back 15 years and I don’t know who owns it now or what the deal is, but yeah it kept bugging me. I’d try and not review the products, and keep getting assigned them. I asked over and over if this is just some kind of paid product placement or a big advertiser or anything I could understand or had encountered before and all I got was weasel words along the lines of it’s not about the brand, it’s about what you wrote… and it was all too fishy. I was at u I do didn’t care too much, but eventually looked into it, and it turned out it was just really invidious. Our publication was owned by this investment capital whatever firm that of course also owned this other company but when I started asking other writers about that it came out that it was actually all about pumping this company for an IPO and all manner of people were heavily invested personally in it. I figured my option at that point was invest myself and drink the cool aid or quit, so I quit. It kinda jaded me to how a lot of stuff works tbh
Plus, even if they weren’t linked in ownership: they sell the product. Every product they talk about is one they’re selling. In the case of someone whom you already know is trying to sell you something, whether or not they own part of the parent company is…not really informative.
@@NewnodrogbobAs KDH said in the video, this isn't the case if you live outside the UK - an Andertons video could be seen as fair to each amp they compare, and any bias towards Victory in that video could sell you an amp from a local dealer (when you didn't know it was the owner telling you it beats a Vox/Marshall/Fender/whatever)
@@matthewwatt2295 I am in the US. This is a bullshit argument. KDH says in the video that the retailer’s cut of the profit will be “close to” the same for all products. Define “close to.” Unless Lee owns the Lion’s share of Victory and is making huge profits from them, the differences between the deals from each manufacturer will be as significant an introducer of bias as the dividends from his stock. Since I don’t know the ins and outs of those deals, I don’t just blindly follow what the Anderton’s guys say. Not that they generally endorse one product over another anyway. It’s also worth noting that these aren’t print articles. They’re recording the gear. The viewer/listener is given plenty of data from which to draw their own conclusion. This isn’t just some pitch man telling you that their soap is the best. This is a big fat nothingburger. Turns out when you get your clicks by being a muckraker, you have to constantly be on the lookout for new muck to rake.
@@Newnodrogbob Honestly, I see where you're coming from, those are some good points. I think this video has done its 'job' by getting Lee to publicise the fact he partially owns Victory amps so people know that when he talks about them. I'm not a huge fan of the 'drama' angle from the title/thumbnail either.
I think it's kind of weird that Lee didn't just say he owns a major/minor stake in Victory for disclosure. He's usually pretty good about disclosing that. I actually had assumed Victory was related to Andertons in some way for years until the Tone Talk episode... which isn't great in light of this video. I mean, Rabea, Rob, and Pete all ended up with signature amps and I think those were all of the big guitar hosts.
I guess I always just assumed Victory was an Andertons thing based on how often their amps appeared in Andertons videos and how the aesthetics looked in line with Andertons aesthetics.
Some time ago I‘ve tried to look up the exact same thing, but stopped at the official trade mark database - I couldn’t draw the link from there. Congratulations, well done!
Lee is a slippery one. It makes watching any new gear review mighty tough to look at without doubting eyes. Andertons should really pass the reviews of Lee owned or partially owned items to someone else. Transparency is a valued trait these days
I love it when KDH drops one of these videos. He's exposed a lot of stuff about the guitar world and anyone with a hint of curiosity could watch these and walk away more informed.
he took a LOT of flak from chapman's fans, and has come around to it so full circle that he continue his reporting on the issue, and even met rob and namm
@@7DavesToDieIt absolutely matters. We should know that Lee, who owns a giant channel and music store, partially owns Victory. If Anderson's didn't stock them, no. But they do and he does videos on them regularly.
@richardharrold9736 ehh, I'd argue the "without busting the bank" series and Rabea Massaad's playing in those is what put them on the map in terms of youtube views.
So many time your video keep me on the edge of my seat watching!! Your an accomplished story teller! Usually I start watching them just wanting to space out for bit and end up with dry eyes because I forget to blink.
This video was again a complete treat! I love these videos and appreciate the work put into it. I have nothing against Lee, seems like a good guy and I think he's a good businessman that at least tries to do mostly the right thing. At least compared to MANY others.
Go in full Sherlock Holmes lol, how that statement fits this topic another great show…. Keep on rocking…. i’ll stick to my two Marshall super lead 100 1971 with the rare three-quarter cabinets that keeps me friendly with the local police and puts cracks in my walls , now how this is how this Irishman who lives in New Jersey by way of Belfast rocks… Great show as usual keep on rock and Broski’s
Not sure what the story is here. A businessman in a dying brick and mortar industry diversified his investments, while giving great reviews to a broad range of amp brands?
The Landlord doesn't have to visit the effects pedals in order to collect the dividends. Given the prominence of Victory in the videos it did feel very interwoven. Wouldn't be surprised if Lee was more involved with the other brands like Tone City
Same. I didn't realise it was a secret. It seemed obvious. I personally grew up before UA-cam, so I couldn't care less who owns what or what people say on videos. I listen to how they sound and respond. I've bought and.loved a few products from videos saying they weren't good, but I liked what I heard 🤷🏻♂️
@@scott6588literally a video of Andertons holding it from people right in front of you… regardless of wether (you thought) you knew or not, they held that info quite clearly lol, you’re missing the point
@@jackflynn-oakley1937 nope.... literally a video subtracting the times lee clearly insinuates bias towards victory amps. Everybody knew. Just like the Peavey videos, it's part of the information, minus the parts that debunk the narrative.
I tend to take videos from Andertons (and most guitar retailers) with a grain of salt because they are all trying to sell gear, so they're never going to be critical of what they're showing, even when they should be. It's almost-but not quite-like a conflict of interest... but this is a whole new version of that because they're hiding their interest in selling a certain brand and that is definitely a conflict
I don't know why people don't understand this. Anderton's is a music store. What kind of videos is a music store going to make? It seems like this is going over people's heads. Very strange.
Why should it change? Lee works in the music industry and has bought some shares in another music company, wow, maybe he even saved the company of going under
Former GC employee here. GC never has to tell its employees to sell more of the house brands, all they have to do is tell the commissioned sales staff how much more profit is built into those products. Fwiw, they never told any of us to be opaque about what brands were owned by GC.
I've not always agreed with everything you've done on this channel. But, this is genuinely important information that the public should know. I always thought that Andertons fondness for Victory and how often their amps are featured on the channel was simply out of a genuine fondness for the product and wanting to support a fellow British company. It seems that actually, there was an undisclosed commercial interest behind it. People seem to forget that Andertons are an equipment selling business FIRST, not a UA-cam channel. Great job bringing this to light!
@@creamwobbly I think it matters because it's a very simple question that someone has gone out of their way to avoid/hide. It's disingenuous, which I find interesting. You're correct about American vs UK disclosure laws, but I don't think that changes the matter of transparency, whether it's legally required or not. Just my two cents.
Great video. I really like the Andertons channel and their content and I'm surprised that this was not disclosed straight up, as I do recall some of the videos with disclaimers related to other brands. Based on this, I would expect them to at least put out a short video owning up for transparency's sake.
Very fair comments and information from KDH here. Chapper's probably watched this and thought 'Whew, thats a relief, I got off lightly... glad he didn't go after me this time around'. 😬
Wow, I’m impressed! Thank you for not giving up on this and doing all the legwork. This has been on more minds than just yours. I do hope Lee follows up with this and admits, at least the smallest of wrongdoing and purposely hiding this. I really hope he does. Thanks again and thanks for not making it any shorter. When it comes to something like this, we want at all.
I think it's likely exactly what Lee said, that with the other brands he is an active member and on the board or equivalent, with Victory he is, assumably, just an investor.
@@alittlebitgoneBaloney. 10 years of pushing VA w/o once mentioning a financial interest. Even an accidental mentioning … no, he intentionally misled people by never saying anything while acting like the reviews were unbiased.
@@carpediem4413 I don't think it's as cynical as everyone's making out. Knowing Lee, I would have thought it's less shrewd money grabbing, and more likely just not wanting to take credit for the work of others, though I do understand that in this cancel culture we live in people will prefer to jump on the bandwagon and demand his head on a plate. Are Victory amps rubbish? Anyone I know who has a Victory product or has owned one loves them. So maybe he is biased, or maybe his bias is based on believing in a well made product that he invested in once. Nobody really knows how much money Lee Anderton does or doesn't receive for his investment anyway. I don't think there's a story here, personally. If you're basing your £2k amp purchase on UA-cam reviews without going and trying the equipment out, Anderson's or not, then you might have bigger problems.
@@jasonleaman. if it's just Lee not wanting to take credit, then he could publicly state that he was an initial investor in the company but now no longer has any business ties. Easy enough and wouldn't harm any reputations. But he won't say that, will he?
When they did a Danish Pete amp it is pretty obvious who's behind it. We'va all known for years. I never knew about the regulations breach though. CLASSIC KDH! Keep it up!!
Fellow Irishman and UA-camr here. Been watching your videos for a while now and have to say, dude…For me, this has been the most enjoyable one yet. Superb research, professional standpoint and presentation (not mean spirited in any way, shape or form), and killer points made throughout the duration. Keep doing what you’re doing! ❤🤘
I think the question would be, What companies does Lee Anderton have interest and investment in? Nothing wrong with it, but would be nice to see the list
I know Anderson’s and have watched a lot of their victory amp reviews. I’ve always wanted a victory amp so have read a lot of reviews and researched them a lot. I had no idea Lee owned the company. The owner was demonstrating an amp form a company he owned and I had no idea. That doesn’t sit right.
I did hear a few years ago while working for PMT that Victory was partially owned by Anderton’s/Chapman and that was why we couldn’t stock them. But honestly I get it because now they’re a great brand where as before they were very close to collapse on a number of occasions. I also just assumed it was mentioned by them that this was the case but I guess I just filled the gaps based on what I knew from work
1) for the sake of integrity and transparency he should've disclosed ownership b) also it's the law. If he is set to make more money out of certain products demonstrated on Andertons TV, we need to know.
When they gave Pete a signature amp that’s when I realised that Victory is a bit too close with Andertons. I like Pete. I like Lee. And I like Andertons. But I’m not sure why the owners of Victory need to keep their identity a secret. It’s not as if those amps are being built off of prison slave labour like Peavey. They seem pretty solid amps and have a strong line up. Weird situation.
At the very least I think UA-cam should force Lee (or others in similar situations) to disclose the video's he is doing as "sponsored" if they own any part of the product or products in the video.
It's flagrant abuse of the UA-cam advertising rules. All videos featuring any brands in which Lee Andertons or Andertons has a stake should be flagged as adverts - because that's what they are. You can't objectively review something you have a financial interest in.
man, you should write dissertions on stuff. your research path is very transparent and understandable. all question that pop up in my head, you answer right after.. and you answer even more things i didn't think about at that moment and that is.. so satisfying for my pseudo-autistic brain.
Yeah, Lee's lack of disclosure is weird b/c no one would have cared. He seems like a righteous dude and he's handled this WAY better than a lot of YT celebs so I'm happy to still be able to rock with Anderton's but keep it above board moving forward, yeah?
@@flashpointnova I have no problem with Lee, I really enjoy the videos and especially his dynamic with all the other team members. It is simply weird that he seems to actively avoid talking about his ownership of the brand. Just seems fishy, even if it may not be intentional.
@@louissanderson719 Involved as in being friends and somehow working together with them sure. Owning them? Absolutely not. And that's important, in my opinion, for the reasons mentioned in the video.
@@Ebbandflow805 It certainly can be. It depends on the motive, consequences,and the "damage" it can and could cause (and how many lawyers your company has) It's always illegal morally. At least in my definition of morality.
KDH, given the recent introduction of Victory's high end line of MK Overdrive and MK Clean series that are $5K and up, are these also built by Straightedge! They are marketed as if Martin Kidd (MK) is personally building these. Does anyone know how this mysterious company is operating
If you buy shares in any publicly listed company you become a co-owner. Does that make you part of their operations ? Same same if you're part of a consortium of investors for a private company, no ?
Since Victory amps started to frequently appear in Anderton's videos I just naturally assumed that it was a house brand. Nevertheless I wouldn't have guessed the actual complexety behind it all and KDH once again delivers in clearing things up!
Honestly, it doesnt even matter. Theyre giving you a demo video on the product, people like what they hear, they buy it. They dont like what they hear, they move on. Theres countless of videos on so many different amps and guitars people have interest in from looking on GC, SW, Zz, Anderton or anywhere on the internet like on tiktoks or instagram reels. Lets be real. You just sound petty and envious really.
I’ve always considered Andertons videos as showcase rather than review, they sell the products and are thus by definition not “independent reviews”. They probably should disclose any involvement, but its not something that bothers me. Having Lee have a statement at the start of every PRS video saying “I am friends with the owner and he once gave me and some of my staff members a free guitar” will be annoying.
Your free to make up your own mind, but there is a world of difference between someone being given a gift from the owner of a company and someone having a direct financial interest in you purchasing one product over another.
@@Sobchak2 True, but his statement is different - it is just a showcase. Listen, watch, make up you mind. Who owns it doesn't matter. Ok, only if in a comparison someone wilfully makes some amp sound bad.
I'm still too new to guitar to even think about an amp bigger than my practice amp or an amp sim, let alone learn about them, but let me tell you i was 100% invested in this bit of sleuthing. Good work.
Apply the patterns thing fully then? Lee has multiple connections to several companies and is very open and pro active about stating his involvement. Therefore its is a safe assumption to make that the reasons Lee has for not shouting Victory involvement from the roof tops are not nefarious. I think his response is very consistent and says he basically helped a friend out at the start and since then has gotten a much more passive role , which I suspect does not exceed a small dividend. Also maybe its a matter of respect for Martyn. Cornford amps were a highly respected brand, and maybe Lee holds Martyn as a figure that should be respected and maybe felt the world did not need to know the details of his involvement, partly because what he claims is likely true and is the dynamic described, and maybe there is deeper stuff. Maybe he is also saving face for his friend a little and allowing Martyn to rebirth himself and his amp career and receive the shine he feels he deserves? Maybe Lee does not wish to upstage his friend? Honestly I dont think you have "uncovered" anything other than what most of the guitar world assumed. In this instance, whilst I get that you are talking abut a principle you feel has been crossed, I think this is an exception to the rule moment and you have basically looked for the sinister where there is nothing of the sort. Lee's other company involvements are enough to indicate that, like you yourself said..."we are looking for patterns" so don't ignore the most obvious pattern just so it fits you narrative? (I don't think you did this consciously, but I do think your motivation is content)
Great video! You really do your homework and don't just go for drama. You are becoming Guitarzilla (which is meant as a compliment, in case you are not a fan of him 😁). Keep at it. I will watch Lee's response in a bit, but I imagine he appreciates what you do as well even if you call him out like this.
US viewer here that Really enjoys your videos. Thorough and evenhanded. Not in a million years would I have predicted I'd find the intrigue of the UK music gear scene so compelling! Well done, KDH
I don't really see how it's a big conspiracy. And i think you have to understand how business are taxed as well as people, to better understand the distance one takes on claiming this that or the other regarding a company they own or a company owned by a company a person owns. If that makes any sense?
I see a lot of people (or at least a few) commenting that they always assumed he was part of Victory. I can safely say that thought never crossed my mind. Not once. I've always found the Andertons YT-channel to be good fun as well as trustworthy. I've always understood that at the end of the day, running a youtube channel had to make sense for them financially, so of course there had to be some element of sales in it. I have always felt that that part was fairly obvious. I remember seeing the Burns video and being pleased that he disclosed his involvement. Same with the Chapman stuff. Builds trust, makes you able to account for any bias. Honestly, I'm pretty disappointed to see that for whatever reason the Victory involvement was kept a secret. And I'd argue intentionally so, given the clip where both Mick Taylor and Rob Chapman disclose their relationship with the company. There's no way he didn't make an active choice to not say anything at that point. It's a shame. I really like their channel. I don't think I'll stop watching their stuff - overall I still feel they are pretty fun and honest people, but I can't say I won't be wondering what they aren't telling me the next time I tune in to one of their videos.
I would replace “honest” with “creative at not saying anything negative about any product ever”. It actually makes even more fun to watch, looking out for exactly those phrases
Mick Taylor has his fingers in a lot of pies too, which is fair enough. However I stopped watching the Pedal Show when I realised they were just constantly plugging products and tbh I don’t regard either of them as experts anyway, just enthusiasts with strong opinions, giving the impression they are experts. JHS, Vertex and Wampler channels is where I’d go for expertise.
@@glenh2752I met D & M in Minnesota once and thought they were arrogant aholes. Pretty disappointing that many of these guys have a great “friendly” personality on camera and you find out they are not at all what they portray. Sounds like LA is a bit of a shrewd operator and not the open/honest guy he has built his YT following on.
Very good work but I can't get overly excited about this one. I think Lee's point that he's not a director/managing partner isn't unreasonable. Owning a stake probably should've been declared yes. I'm just not sure I see it as a big gotcha.
Lee Responded ua-cam.com/video/_lRPbEHZ9DE/v-deo.html
Have you actually send an email to the Victory Amps asking them to disclose the PSCs?
Not really a secret - change your title it’s very much bait and manufactured drama. It’s totally ok to not declare everything in business - it can give you competitive advantage and i think the UK guitar industry needs all the support it can get… you go Lee and company!!!
@KDH everybody already knows Lee responded, and you know what You're an idiot 😂
@@nornicle2fully agree, he's so up his own ass about this he's created something no one else agrees with.
@@davidconnelly Umm... Who are you responding to I don't see anybody in this thread that said that. Corn flakes? Shredded wheat? Ah snowflakes 🙂
The high comedy of this is that UA-cam served up an Amderton's advertisement in the middle of watching yiur video.
It's pretty wild seeing Lee, an owner of the company, sit by quietly as Mick talks about his potential bias.
Yeah and they are featured heavily on their Channel. I mean I love them I have 4! And two preamps. But Lee should have come clean a long time ago.
Who gives a f**k?
I just want to express my appreciation for your efforts. Great journalism, very well researched and elegantly presented.
Very kind of thee, I would also donate if I had income
I can always trust KDH to give me drama on amps I can't dream to afford
That's why I buy used 😂 got a duchess v4 for $600 on reverb
That was my thought. There are certainly amps like that: Soldano, etc but Victory isn't one of them.
That’s because he’s a little slut for the drama
@@michaelgriffin5304 I feel like in the end
All restaurants will be Taco Bell
All guitars will be Ibanez
All amps will be Synergy
Victory amps are moderately priced new. Used you can find some great deals. I was on the fence between Victory and Friedman. In the end the Friedman did more for me and was the Keeper.
I did not know guitar-based investigative journalism was a thing, but I'm here for it.
Neither did lee... apparently
Im looooving it ahhah@@rainblaze.
Your investigation skills are incredible - Your dogged and persistent digging reveals a LOT! You are a Legend, and thanks for making this public...
Funnily enough I always thought that Victory was an in-house brand from Andertons, I think I got that idea because of body language and tone when they talked about it, it was like "well, this feels more like an add than usual"
Same here. I always kind of had the feeling, given the tone Lee, Rabea, Rob, and Pete would always take with the amps, and the fact that they were the signature artist for the amps, that Victory was an Andertons house brand. I don't like that Lee wont disclose fully his role in the company, and would play a semantics game to seemingly avoid it, but I do understand Lee not seeing himself as a large enough part of the company to note if he is in fact greatly divorced from the operations of the brand.
Yeah well said, and I agree it crossed my mind too, the way they always bigged it up!
Yep. A rabbit hole not worth jumping into. The time to scour the web for info on the subject would probably be better spent on enriching one's personal life, and the family and friends around them. In the grand scheme of life, it's absolutely meaningless. I wish KDH had music to share. I like music😁
@@patrickkish6662well good news we have someone covering it so we don’t have to do any of the leg work 😂 and I personally do find it interesting and entertaining to watch this stuff. Reminds me they are all trying to make a buck off of us 🤷🏽♂️
@@patrickkish6662 Hi Lee !
I think it's probably pretty safe to say that Andertons is involved in any brand that has a Rabea/Danish Pete/Chappers et al signature model.
Disclosing brand deals or ownership (no matter how small) must happen when influencers bring product onto their channel. This was drilled into the heads of all influencers ages ago but there still seem to be the remaining few that try to duck and dodge it.
Outstanding quality of work. Documented investigation, no personal bias, no drama, no unnecessary shade thrown at Andertons. That's a 10/10 from me.
Honestly think it's his best video yet 11/10
This video is fucking pathetic.
Personally, I felt there was significant shade and drama - I don't have a dog in this fight mind you, but i definitely felt the tone was very provocative.
The way it came across to me was "I'm going to be snappy and condescending for nearly a half hour at Lee Anderton, even tho when I directly asked him he said 'yup I'm part owner'".
The video is called andertons big secret you mug it's blatant drama clickbait bullshit. grow up
@@afaella3 Lee made a bunch of videos promoting Victory's products without disclosing that relationship. That is misleading.
That he came clean when directly asked about it does not change that he misled the public in the first place. Frankly, Lee had no other choice but to disclose when directly asked, as lying about it is a criminal offence.
Pointing out that someone is potentially breaching advertising ethics isn't "shade and drama", it's providing the consumer with important information. This video resulted in Lee admitting something he hadn't made sufficiently clear to customers beforehand.
I don't see why you're running interference on behalf of a business owner who got caught breaching advertising ethics. Lee isn't paying you to do his PR. Do you think businesses shouldn't be required to disclose relevant relationships when promoting products? That's a difficult stance to defend.
Man... damn. You know its gonna be a rough day when KDH is sitting in your office with a question he probably already has the answer to. LMAO
Seriously, if this dude asked me what I did last week he could probably tell me better than I could remember.
I have to disagree with everyone else's comments and I will explain why. This video and its contents is 'MEh Meh and Meh again'. This video for no good reason whatsoever is having a dig at Lee of Andertons, simply to get views and likes for his 'UA-cam' channel.
62k views = about $60 dollars? Don't spend it all at once....
Completely pointless video, all that is going on is, (you might have heard of this term?)' 'Marketing'. So what if Lee does not 'disclose', every single company he is involved in. If Mr Andertons was using a company as a cover, to import Columbian finest white powder. You would have a story but this is just Meh, and pointless.
In the Uk for years Jhs, (not Josh the other one based in the uk), had a magazine in music shops that advertised their own gear, and of course, gave it glowing reviews. No one gave two dumps about that, and no one should really give the same about this video and its contents.
@@james1658KAAY, Lee’s burner account. Stop being so butthurt. You’re obviously in the minority here. These are the type of videos that are liked and shared, thus growing the channel. Keep a close eye on KDH’s subscriber count over the next month and get back to me on whether he’s gained or lost followers.
@james1658 . Yup. I've been to companies House and I can't see a link between KDH and Buckfast? Hmmmmm. Suspicious, you decide.
@@james1658 I'm sorry, if this is how you do marketing in the UK then you are breaking the law. This is a story that evolved out of a question that MANY people in the industry and consumers of these products have asked MANY TIMES. That question was simply, "Who owns Victory?". The fact that Andertons came up was not a fabrication for views. It was part of the answer that was hidden underneath our noses.
I'm sure you are a fine person but I can't help but entirely disagree with your sentiment and your point of view.
The worst part is private label products like this are common place in the industry; a way music stores can offer lower prices on low end gear by cutting out brands and pulling straight from the distributor. It also helps with offering accessories and products as add-ons in sales to increase margins. Michell, Proline, Gamma, Delta Lab(the pedals), Live Wire, Harbinger are all Guitar Center Brands. Musician's Gear, and Rouge were Musician's Friend. Sam Ash had Micheal Kelly, and Samson. and Mars had a bunch too that I can't remember. This is common and only shady when you hide it.
The Landlord one really surprised me. As far as I know, they never acknowledged being a part of that, while also liking them very vocally. That sounds very dubious to me unfortunately.
I’ll never forget I once bought a landlord pedal from andertons that turned out to be faulty and I just wanted to return it, not swap for a non faulty unit. The rep actually tried to convince me to swap it as “It works out better for us if we just exchange tone city stuff”.
Which gave me 2 impressions.
1) Respectfully, I don’t give a shit what “works out better for you”, give me my refund 😂 and
2) “Oh, so Landlord pedals are just rebranded tone city circuits”.
Not a slight on Landlord though, I’ve used a lock-in tuner for ages, great little unit.
@@BaBaBaBenny well, any shop would rather give an exchange than a refund.
Dodgy as F
@@BaBaBaBenny Tone City, Landlord, loads of those in-house brands are exactly the same pedals. Just rebranded for their respective retailers.
Same goes for most of the Aliexpress pedals and a lot of the other cheap mini-pedals on the market.
@@lueysixty-six7300 Naturally, I've just never had an employee directly tell me that to my face whilst I was trying to get a refund... O _ O
Great video.
What’s weird is that Lee could have gone the exact opposite direction with his disclosures and garnered a lot of interest and respect. “I have access to some of the best ears and fingers in the UK, I’m an expert in guitar products, my team and I have played virtually every guitar amp ever made, yada yada” and made this a selling point, rather than a secret.
Keep up any videos and content you do
Totally Agree
Had he been honest from the start, there would be no problem. Now he has a ten year history of hiding his conflict of interest. His credibility is gone.
You think the other amp manufacturers they stock would have been cool with it?
It could be the other partners wanted his involvement secret on the vids to get a buzz going and he played ball. Maybe a hard one to admit to after ten years.
You just got rewarded with a new subscriber..!! The way you bite into your research is admirable and very much appreciated.
KDH is not here to make friends, props mate, excellent work.
Watching KDH become the go-to name in down-to-earth guitar reporting has been a real treat! Keep it up mate!
I've always thought Lee or Rob had their hand in Victory amps in some way after watching a lot of their videos. I was curious about them when I last needed a new amp but went with something else.
When I saw the signature amplifiers I assumed Lee Anderton was involved with Victory.
Absolutely it’s not a long shot to arrive at that conclusion
Same
I mean, I guess it was dubious. But, as KDH points out, the law is very clear and communication on such matters has to be crystal clear.
Even if the assumption is an obvious one to make, you still have to disclose such things.
I absolutely didnt think that.
I just thought that Victory is a young team of guys that is heavily betting on the youtube game with abdertons because they are just friends
I gotta say KDH, When I first started watching your videos a while back I was like "man this guy hates everything". (I am laughing while I write this). But as time has marched on, I realized that you are the hero we need. I love your content keep up the great work.
same!
I was typing my own comment when I noticed this one and you said what I was trying to say in a much better way. So I'll just say "True Dat" 😁
You know, leeches are pretty disgusting little creatures, but they can be useful time to time, heroes for some, parasites for others, so is KDH.
And if there is no new YT drama, just invent your own, right?
Just some toughts for the internet moral police... LOL
This is not moral issue...more breaching laws issue
@@roko650serious point me to the law that has been breached?
Well done. "KDH" and "Wings of Pegasus" are proving to be formidable investigative channels that are able to bring unpleasant truths to light.
KDH, you have a very bright future. Smart, young, and driven. We are watching you grow up right in front of us and you're doing great. Never lose sight of your goals. Remain humble and never compromise your own integrity.
One thing I really like about you KDH, is even when you have dirt on somebody, you don't belittle them for it. You are always straightforward with the facts, and forward about the ethics on why you are doing it, without outright attacking anybody's character. It really allows me to trust your work more as it doesn't seem like a way to mindlessly stroke your ego about being right, but because you actually care about getting to the bottom of these issues.
Keeping business owners responsible and helping to protect consumers. KDH doesn’t need insults and nonsense for that!
What’s the “dirt” here?
@@FlyingCircusAct dirt is a pretty vague word when used like this. In this case I’m just meaning potential drama. But KDH doesn’t make it any worse than it already is by adding any more drama, he respectfully brings to light consumer issues in an incredibly professional way. This is genuine journalism and I was just being a bit hyperbolic for brevity.
@@WeyounSix I appreciate your honesty, extremely rare in todays world. I’m still left wondering where the issue lies, is there pending litigation with this? Something “shady” going on? From what I’ve witnessed, Lee’s fair across the board with amp reviews and the like. Not sue what I’m missing.
@@FlyingCircusActThe issue is that as an influencer you need to be transparent about where your interest lies. We all know he has a vested interest in Andertons and the channel is there to sell products from his shop. No issues there. What we didn’t know is that he is part owner of Victory a brand that he pushes continuously over other amp manufacturers. People watch that and assume it’s unbiased as he sells all of them anyway. Whet he’s not saying is that he also has a vested interest in that brand and it’s market share, therefore it’s not an unbiased opinion but one made as the owner of that company who stands to make money from the sale of Victory no matter where you buy them from.
i'm pretty sure we already knew Andertons owned Victory? Like i was already sure of it for some reason? They must have mentioned it when the amps were first coming out, also at the start they basically only made amps for Rob Chapman, so i guess i had this narrative in my mind that Martin Kidd started making amps for Rob and then Lee bought the company to develop the brand, or something like that, anyway they are undeniably great amps at pretty great prices, so in the end, who cares?
Post rationalisation memory syndrome
I have definitely seen Lee in an Andertons video from a few years back mention that he had an involvement in Victory, I remember it as he just mentioned it in passing and my ears pricked up thinking ''well you've never mentioned that before''. Not really a problem but something to bear in mind when they are pushing Victory products.
Really? Can you share the videos? I don't think I've heard him say anything about any involvement with the brand. But I haven't watched every video. But KDH couldn't find anything either.
I mean, other than being friends or helping in development or whatever.
Yeah he had involvement, he would give advice and be asked his opinion on products. He compared speaker cabinets etc. "Involvement" and "part ownership" are quite different though.
@@thebigb3ard exactly. Rabea has involvement (and discloses it). Lee has something else.
@@mrcoatsworth429 Now you're asking... it was just a passing remark in one video, as I recall he was kind of 'off set', hand held camera 'behind the scenes' sort of stuff, pointing out a Victory prototype in the corner of the room, I think a 'work in progress' for a potential signature for Rob or Rabea. What he said wasn't a 'we're working with them' kinda thing, it was definitely something inferring that Andertons had a stake in Victory. As I said, that's why my ears pricked up and since then it's always been in the back of my mind when they feature Victory Amps. It was only a five second bit in a video maybe 3-4 years ago. Good luck finding it!
@@mrbrick5907 Thanks! Well, I'm not about to look for it myself haha Now we know what his involvement is.
But what do you mean by "now you're asking..." At what other time should I have been asking?
Hmm....who would bring out a Rob Chapman tribute amp??? Should have been able to answer that one quite some years ago 😀
Merci!
Thank you!
This has absolutely become my favorite guitar channel. It's so refreshing to hear calm and articulate news about the industry. It's like a high-gain channel for grownups. No prattle at 100 mph, editing out the pauses and saying "bruh" every 20 seconds. Sweet Jebus, please keep doing what you're doing \m/
Just as an FYI. GAP isn’t Andertons. It’s a distribution company owned and run by the owners of Guitarguitar, Andertons and PMT (GAP is an acronym of their companies) so that they could have more buying power on certain products. They realised they could make more margin on cheaper products instead of going through companies like Stagg. Companies like Eastcoast and TourTech exist only for this purpose. You’ll notice only these three companies sell these brands.
Great investigating though.
If am going to buy a Victory amp it because of the sound and build quality, not because of Lee Anderton.
I hope someday Lee can own all the companies. Maybe after Lee owns all the companies Dave Grohl can do all the music and the two can control the entire global music scene.
Bahahahahahaaa!! That’s hilarious mate. Lol😂❤
The Best The Best The Best The Best The Best The Best The Best
hahahaha
@richardharrold9736 Tell me about it I'm so sick of his face I can't listen to Foo Fighters anymore.
@richardharrold9736 wait what did dave grohl do lol
I actually had already thought Victory was an Anderton’s house brand but I can’t recall why.
The whole UK gear manufacturing and retail industry is a very small circle
EXACTLY! This kind of weird "i gotcha" shit is not really warranted here. It's so unbelievably small and informal. Hence why Lee refers to them as the guys at Victory. The reason why he talks about Victory that way is because he FEELS that way. Instead of bleating "I OWN THIS BRAND GUYS" (or something far more reasonable) before playing something on one, he shows respect to the guys who DO run Victory's day-to-day shit and apply their awesome knowledge. I assume, at least partially, that the reason why Lee refuses to see himself as equal with them is because of that HUMAN dynamic. KDH, you're too rigid in how you're seeing this. Brand presentation, rigid assumptions about many things without self-reflecting on your own demands. How do you think the guys at Victory who are responsible for the hard work to create the product itself (the focus should be on who makes it in terms of HANDS ON THE PRODUCT) feel about this guy blasting that he is the owner? You need to think more critically KDH. There is nuance to these things. There's a lot more with the whole brand identity thing and I don't want to type up a whole storm about it.
I have to agree.
Still should be open about it
Same here. No surprise for me......
@@JR_Taylor Think more, meaning critically attack your own position and/or try to build up Lee's so you can see more and find the correct conclusion by rocking back and forth between the practices to arrive at a more rounded understanding by settling between the two extremes. I don't think my position is extreme, there are valid reasons to reduce transparency on certain things because as buyers, we don't think in terms that are conducive to logical conclusions. Everyone suffers from this, that's what Lee was trying to say about the pedals being blindfolded. There's nothing secret or shady about this, it's how the consumer mind works
I’ve always thought of Victory being synonymous with Anderton’s, this video just confirms it. Either way, they’re killer amps and I do like Lee (his public persona at least).
think this blokes a whinger
Hes a bit of an oblivious bellend but i do feel hes a good person. Being forced to grow up fast and take over a family company can do that sometimes.
@@Thatdudeoverthere69420I’m sure we’ve all met a ceo much worse than Mr Lee. He’s a great guy who’s managed to accomplish the impossible task of taking over the family business and bringing it into the modern age
@@Thatdudeoverthere69420 *cough cough* Jeff Kiesel
@@Thatdudeoverthere69420 Yeah I got the vibe that he just didn't mention it and then felt weird bringing it up rather than being malicious ... still makes them very untrustworthy. Stupidity isn't an excuse in cases like this.
Hey KDH. The following brands are legally affiliated with either Lee or Andertons. Ive also included the gross profit margins on products when sold via Andertons.
Tone City Pedals - 70-80%
Landlord FX Pedals - 70-80%
Chapman Guitars - 35-45%
Burns Guitars - 30-40%
Tourtech - 50-90%
Stagg - 50-80%
Faith Guitars - 30-45%
Eastcoast Guitars - 45-55%
Victory Amps - 35-50%
There are probably more, but this is what can be remembered. Source- Ex Andertons employee.
Interesting list! Perhaps some involvement in Thorpy pedals as well?
I would have been surprised if Tone City wasn’t on the list or if someone listed it.
@@JamesMears76 he uses ThorpyFx to help design some Victory pedals (but only because Dan Coggins is a ThorpyFX employee, not because Adrian has any talent whatsoever). Otherwise he'd employ Coggins directly and not deal with the secretly most hated man in FX pedals.
@@ghalsor the signature Rabea and Danish Pete signature pedals, sold for £44.99 were purchased by Andertons for £8.31 a unit. If you bought both, you got a "free" power supply and daisy chain. The plug was £1.10, the daisy chain was £0.51 (normally retailing at £9.99 and £4.99 respectively). So you'd pay £89.98 for £18.23 worth of product. That applies to any and all Tone City mini-pedal deal.
@@JamesMears76 unfortunately not that I can remember. But it probably shows why Lee was incentivised to use Thorpy for Victory.
Timestamps
0:00 Intro
1:12 Victory
2:02 Lee Anderton
4:10 Martin Kidd Interview
6:00 Straight Edge
6:50 Trademarks
7:58 Coincidences
11:36 Lees Response
13:12 The Issue ?
15:26 The Guys At Victory
17:00 A bad thing?
21:50 Lees Response 2
25:56 Conclusion
Yeah you gotta keep going in on these characters son,tear they ass up now
Excellent research and presentation as usual. These are not easy vids to make. Very impressive. Thanks.
I've noticed your appearance of health has been diminishing with each video. It's about the music, and your mental and physical well being. Think about it, KDH. You're not posting videos of yourself playing. Music is about the song. Not the politics of product production. Think about it as you investigate the image in the mirror
he seems to be in a pretty good shape in my opinion .. and I guess his choice, as a musician, is to not only show him play, but to inform us on what's happening in that industry which is living and existing because of us, consumers, who are buying their gears ... sometimes based on lies and false reviews unfortunately ... KDH work is tremendous, extremely valuable and we should thank him for that.
These videos get the views. It's what everyone wants to watch. If you want the music go look up his band W.A.L.K.E.R.
Well done. The Martin Kidd interview at the 4:22 mark actually tells a whole bunch when the real story is known. Martin cleverly pivots when he seems to realize that he might accidentally reveal the well-kept ownership secret.
Except that wouldn’t look good if every other video of his was about Victory Amps.
As someone who, years ago, quit my job as a daily newspaper writer over a matter concerning integrity, honesty, and what I was and was not allowed to write about something, I appreciate your investigative integrity and tenacity in attempting to get to the bottom of things and then not being afraid to say it regardless of what people will and will not conclude.
I've really nothing against Andertons as a business, however, unlike a lot of people, I've never been much of a fan of their videos; they've always come across as a bit cliquey to me, so it was interesting to find, as a result of your investigative efforts here, that there is apparently something more substantial in terms of ownership and interests to that cliquey feeling than just my personal perception.
And with regards to ASA standards breaches, as well as having been a news writer in the past, I also worked in advertising for a number of years. So I can tell them from a position of some personal experience that they really do need to get on that and correct things not merely as a matter of integrity, but also to avoid some potential fines and other punitive measures, because the ASA does actually have some teeth when it comes to things like that.
Retired newspaper journalist here in the U.S. I agree with your analysis as well.
I don't think any standards are being broken - Lee is an investor in Victory as a private individual, not the store, and the videos are the product of the store (which he happens to own as a separate entity).
Is there a conflict? Yes, but it is hardly a scandalous one - see my comment, this is a niche industry dealing in pretty small money values, so raising capital is very hard and this sort of arrangement is very common.
Let me put it this way - if Lee's involvement in Victory, as one of 9 owners and the primary dealer, is £100k, but his involvement in Andertons where his is the principal is, say, £5million, then I can see why he doesn't really see it as a conflict, and why he always says "those guys at Victory". He doesn't see his minor-to-him financial investment as being a big deal. He also doesn't see much return on that compared to what he sees from, say, Chapman (whose value is only £250k, by the way - did I mention that this is a NICHE industry?).
@@MrLivebynight If you have to hide your ownership of companies you review, then it's obviously a hopelessly dishonest position. The dude proved he has no personal integrity by sticking to keeping his personal ownership role for 10 years under wraps as he tried to give his investment a boost with his "unbiased" rave reviews. That is about as obvious an example as you can have, of a completely biased individual who knows how little credibility glowing reviews of a company from one of it's owners are afforded.
So in other words, he understands his own bias very well and how that appears to consumers, hence decided to hide it, and he can't pretend it was a moment of weakness, since he continued to cover it up as he ran a stealth promotion campaign for them disguised as unbiased reviewer comments, publicly for a decade. It wasn't a decision to lie once, but to hide the truth as ongoing policy, from the intended audience (amp shoppers), to influence their buying behavior towards the only behavior that was going to boost his portfolio of business holdings; for a decade.
He hid the truth as he was later forced to admit and made a pathetic excuse for, to make people believe he wasn't involved, because he wanted his promotions to be mistaken for unbiased reviews from a brand fan with no personal stake in whether people responded by purchasing or not. Does honesty mean nothing to you, that even legal standards aren't low enough; you have to excuse the lies of someone who can't even manage to muster up the personal integrity to stay on the right side of advertising laws?
@@Gregorypeckory Perfect summation of the situation. Clearly Anderton lied by omission in every Video with a Victory amp in it. He must have considered that before the cameras rolled, every time. Chose not to be honest. I think it's pretty serious stuff. The other amp makers featured in those videos should seriously consider their relationship with andertons. The videos have to be treated as biased.
Kinda unrelated to the video, but your story gave me major flashbacks. I used to have a little blog reviewing things from time to time and when I was at uni I got a gig as a content writer for a review site. I wasn’t studying journalism or anything and it didn’t pay much, but given my only other income was stocking freezers at a supermarket twice a week and repairing gameboys to sell on eBay it was very appreciated!
They were also pretty patient with me as I was very green - I had to learn real basics of professional reviews like you can’t say it’s bad, you have to say it’s stronger in other areas or find a positive on the back of a downside, the top 5 shootouts, etc that get more traction and mean you can say x is great for y, a great for b, etc and avoid saying directly ‘this is pants’.
That was all kind of okay, I learnt to play the game - you’re selling ad space and advertisers don’t want any beef, they might even be suppliers of products you’ll be reviewing in a different article, plus if you say everything’s crap people stop giving you stuff, and not a lot of places can afford to buy all their review products and turn a profit. It is what it is - I think most people understand; it’s kinda like the 5 star rule right? If it’s a professional product review or a coffee shop eating on google, the scale doesn’t really go from 0-5, it goes from 4.0-5.0.
But then I ran into one company I just couldn’t review. Every time I reviewed a product it’d get bounced back to me and they were not accepting anything other than glowing reviews. I read reviews other had read for the site and it was all the same and this just went on and on. I’m actually keeping the product field and publication under wraps because this is going back 15 years and I don’t know who owns it now or what the deal is, but yeah it kept bugging me. I’d try and not review the products, and keep getting assigned them. I asked over and over if this is just some kind of paid product placement or a big advertiser or anything I could understand or had encountered before and all I got was weasel words along the lines of it’s not about the brand, it’s about what you wrote… and it was all too fishy. I was at u I do didn’t care too much, but eventually looked into it, and it turned out it was just really invidious. Our publication was owned by this investment capital whatever firm that of course also owned this other company but when I started asking other writers about that it came out that it was actually all about pumping this company for an IPO and all manner of people were heavily invested personally in it. I figured my option at that point was invest myself and drink the cool aid or quit, so I quit. It kinda jaded me to how a lot of stuff works tbh
Never thought it to be a secret with all the videos of them helping with development and promotions, I assumed they had financial involvement.
This is what I thought too. Had never heard of victory until they were on Andertons, so I assumed they were linked through ownership.
Plus, even if they weren’t linked in ownership: they sell the product. Every product they talk about is one they’re selling. In the case of someone whom you already know is trying to sell you something, whether or not they own part of the parent company is…not really informative.
@@NewnodrogbobAs KDH said in the video, this isn't the case if you live outside the UK - an Andertons video could be seen as fair to each amp they compare, and any bias towards Victory in that video could sell you an amp from a local dealer (when you didn't know it was the owner telling you it beats a Vox/Marshall/Fender/whatever)
@@matthewwatt2295 I am in the US. This is a bullshit argument. KDH says in the video that the retailer’s cut of the profit will be “close to” the same for all products. Define “close to.” Unless Lee owns the Lion’s share of Victory and is making huge profits from them, the differences between the deals from each manufacturer will be as significant an introducer of bias as the dividends from his stock. Since I don’t know the ins and outs of those deals, I don’t just blindly follow what the Anderton’s guys say. Not that they generally endorse one product over another anyway.
It’s also worth noting that these aren’t print articles. They’re recording the gear. The viewer/listener is given plenty of data from which to draw their own conclusion. This isn’t just some pitch man telling you that their soap is the best.
This is a big fat nothingburger. Turns out when you get your clicks by being a muckraker, you have to constantly be on the lookout for new muck to rake.
@@Newnodrogbob Honestly, I see where you're coming from, those are some good points. I think this video has done its 'job' by getting Lee to publicise the fact he partially owns Victory amps so people know that when he talks about them. I'm not a huge fan of the 'drama' angle from the title/thumbnail either.
Watching to see what the secret is.. popcorn at the ready.. the question is who cares who owns it.. I have a jcm800 ….
4 stage it with plate EQ and go 6550. Second to none😂
I think it's kind of weird that Lee didn't just say he owns a major/minor stake in Victory for disclosure. He's usually pretty good about disclosing that. I actually had assumed Victory was related to Andertons in some way for years until the Tone Talk episode... which isn't great in light of this video. I mean, Rabea, Rob, and Pete all ended up with signature amps and I think those were all of the big guitar hosts.
I guess I always just assumed Victory was an Andertons thing based on how often their amps appeared in Andertons videos and how the aesthetics looked in line with Andertons aesthetics.
I like a good detective story:-)
Some time ago I‘ve tried to look up the exact same thing, but stopped at the official trade mark database - I couldn’t draw the link from there. Congratulations, well done!
Lee is a slippery one. It makes watching any new gear review mighty tough to look at without doubting eyes.
Andertons should really pass the reviews of Lee owned or partially owned items to someone else.
Transparency is a valued trait these days
I work for a sheet metal company round the corner from straight edge and we laser cut the badges for the victory amps
I love it when KDH drops one of these videos. He's exposed a lot of stuff about the guitar world and anyone with a hint of curiosity could watch these and walk away more informed.
he does it in such an elegant way.
Yeah but none of it really matters and imo comes off as douchey
he took a LOT of flak from chapman's fans, and has come around to it so full circle that he continue his reporting on the issue, and even met rob and namm
@@7DavesToDieIt absolutely matters. We should know that Lee, who owns a giant channel and music store, partially owns Victory. If Anderson's didn't stock them, no. But they do and he does videos on them regularly.
He’s an utter moron. Something wrong with him.
I'd watch a Lee Anderton masterclass on marketing.
It would be a short masterclass.
He just got on UA-cam and ran with it .
@richardharrold9736 ehh, I'd argue the "without busting the bank" series and Rabea Massaad's playing in those is what put them on the map in terms of youtube views.
@@mikel5163Chapman too, to be fair.
I love how this channel became some sort of content cop for other artists in the industry, good video! 🎉
So many time your video keep me on the edge of my seat watching!! Your an accomplished story teller! Usually I start watching them just wanting to space out for bit and end up with dry eyes because I forget to blink.
This video was again a complete treat! I love these videos and appreciate the work put into it.
I have nothing against Lee, seems like a good guy and I think he's a good businessman that at least tries to do mostly the right thing. At least compared to MANY others.
Go in full Sherlock Holmes lol, how that statement fits this topic another great show…. Keep on rocking…. i’ll stick to my two Marshall super lead 100 1971 with the rare three-quarter cabinets that keeps me friendly with the local police and puts cracks in my walls , now how this is how this Irishman who lives in New Jersey by way of Belfast rocks… Great show as usual keep on rock and Broski’s
Not sure what the story is here. A businessman in a dying brick and mortar industry diversified his investments, while giving great reviews to a broad range of amp brands?
The Landlord doesn't have to visit the effects pedals in order to collect the dividends. Given the prominence of Victory in the videos it did feel very interwoven. Wouldn't be surprised if Lee was more involved with the other brands like Tone City
These videos are excellent btw, you have a real knack for this kind of stuff, great work.
I’d always assumed Anderton’s owned at least a part of it, a bit like it has done (and disclosed) with Eastcoast.
Same. I didn't realise it was a secret. It seemed obvious.
I personally grew up before UA-cam, so I couldn't care less who owns what or what people say on videos. I listen to how they sound and respond. I've bought and.loved a few products from videos saying they weren't good, but I liked what I heard 🤷🏻♂️
Everyone knew.
KDH just trying to divert from the Peavey videos he never retracted.
@@scott6588why would he want to divert from Peavy video?
@@scott6588literally a video of Andertons holding it from people right in front of you… regardless of wether (you thought) you knew or not, they held that info quite clearly lol, you’re missing the point
@@jackflynn-oakley1937 nope.... literally a video subtracting the times lee clearly insinuates bias towards victory amps.
Everybody knew.
Just like the Peavey videos, it's part of the information, minus the parts that debunk the narrative.
I tend to take videos from Andertons (and most guitar retailers) with a grain of salt because they are all trying to sell gear, so they're never going to be critical of what they're showing, even when they should be. It's almost-but not quite-like a conflict of interest... but this is a whole new version of that because they're hiding their interest in selling a certain brand and that is definitely a conflict
I don't know why people don't understand this. Anderton's is a music store. What kind of videos is a music store going to make? It seems like this is going over people's heads. Very strange.
Doesn’t change my opinion of Lee. Love the guys over at Anderton’s, and that includes Lee.
Why should it change? Lee works in the music industry and has bought some shares in another music company, wow, maybe he even saved the company of going under
@@bernardo9202tf are you talking about?
@@BerriesAllen that Lee is allowed to have his businesses as he seems fit
You would be amazed at how many brands Guitar Center owns and has their employees push over established brands.
Former GC employee here. GC never has to tell its employees to sell more of the house brands, all they have to do is tell the commissioned sales staff how much more profit is built into those products. Fwiw, they never told any of us to be opaque about what brands were owned by GC.
That would be helpful for the people in the US for sure. GC is everywhere.
@@russellzauner The US leans a lot more on the side of business than the consumer, unfortunately.
I wonder which brands Guitar Center owns?
gc doesnt kep their brands secret.
I've not always agreed with everything you've done on this channel. But, this is genuinely important information that the public should know. I always thought that Andertons fondness for Victory and how often their amps are featured on the channel was simply out of a genuine fondness for the product and wanting to support a fellow British company. It seems that actually, there was an undisclosed commercial interest behind it. People seem to forget that Andertons are an equipment selling business FIRST, not a UA-cam channel. Great job bringing this to light!
Who cares?
@@creamwobbly I think it matters because it's a very simple question that someone has gone out of their way to avoid/hide. It's disingenuous, which I find interesting. You're correct about American vs UK disclosure laws, but I don't think that changes the matter of transparency, whether it's legally required or not. Just my two cents.
Great video. I really like the Andertons channel and their content and I'm surprised that this was not disclosed straight up, as I do recall some of the videos with disclaimers related to other brands. Based on this, I would expect them to at least put out a short video owning up for transparency's sake.
Very fair comments and information from KDH here. Chapper's probably watched this and thought 'Whew, thats a relief, I got off lightly... glad he didn't go after me this time around'. 😬
Wow, I’m impressed! Thank you for not giving up on this and doing all the legwork. This has been on more minds than just yours. I do hope Lee follows up with this and admits, at least the smallest of wrongdoing and purposely hiding this. I really hope he does. Thanks again and thanks for not making it any shorter. When it comes to something like this, we want at all.
Great video as always. If peeps don't understand the conflict of interest, that's not on you. 💚🎸
What's odd to me is that Lee generally does disclose ownership (like you showed). It makes you wonder why he doesn't with Victory.
I think it's likely exactly what Lee said, that with the other brands he is an active member and on the board or equivalent, with Victory he is, assumably, just an investor.
@@alittlebitgoneNo, being a partner is exactly (well, not exactly exactly, but you know what I mean) the same as being on the board of a company.
@@alittlebitgoneBaloney. 10 years of pushing VA w/o once mentioning a financial interest. Even an accidental mentioning … no, he intentionally misled people by never saying anything while acting like the reviews were unbiased.
@@carpediem4413 I don't think it's as cynical as everyone's making out. Knowing Lee, I would have thought it's less shrewd money grabbing, and more likely just not wanting to take credit for the work of others, though I do understand that in this cancel culture we live in people will prefer to jump on the bandwagon and demand his head on a plate. Are Victory amps rubbish? Anyone I know who has a Victory product or has owned one loves them. So maybe he is biased, or maybe his bias is based on believing in a well made product that he invested in once. Nobody really knows how much money Lee Anderton does or doesn't receive for his investment anyway. I don't think there's a story here, personally. If you're basing your £2k amp purchase on UA-cam reviews without going and trying the equipment out, Anderson's or not, then you might have bigger problems.
@@jasonleaman. if it's just Lee not wanting to take credit, then he could publicly state that he was an initial investor in the company but now no longer has any business ties. Easy enough and wouldn't harm any reputations. But he won't say that, will he?
Fantastic work, man! Thanks for shedding some light on this. Lack of transparency where transparency is due is always an issue and needs called out.
Does "That Pedal Show" have any involvement, because I've always wondered why there are Victory amps in the background all the time.
When they did a Danish Pete amp it is pretty obvious who's behind it. We'va all known for years. I never knew about the regulations breach though. CLASSIC KDH! Keep it up!!
@richardharrold9736 and he's sucked Lee Andertons dick an awful lot.
Looking forward to a KDH Victory signature amp 🇮🇪
When Anderton's shipping is more expensive then the guitars they sell to the US, there is an issue.
Fellow Irishman and UA-camr here. Been watching your videos for a while now and have to say, dude…For me, this has been the most enjoyable one yet. Superb research, professional standpoint and presentation (not mean spirited in any way, shape or form), and killer points made throughout the duration. Keep doing what you’re doing! ❤🤘
I think the question would be, What companies does Lee Anderton have interest and investment in?
Nothing wrong with it, but would be nice to see the list
I know Anderson’s and have watched a lot of their victory amp reviews. I’ve always wanted a victory amp so have read a lot of reviews and researched them a lot. I had no idea Lee owned the company. The owner was demonstrating an amp form a company he owned and I had no idea. That doesn’t sit right.
Totally speculative but Andertons always gave me that shady salesman vibe, even knowing nothing about it. It's just a hunch I get from their reps
100%
Slimy could be a better word.
Deffo
That's kind of the nature of sales/advertising though. All of them are on the shade end of the spectrum :D
@richardharrold9736holy shit what
I did hear a few years ago while working for PMT that Victory was partially owned by Anderton’s/Chapman and that was why we couldn’t stock them. But honestly I get it because now they’re a great brand where as before they were very close to collapse on a number of occasions. I also just assumed it was mentioned by them that this was the case but I guess I just filled the gaps based on what I knew from work
1) for the sake of integrity and transparency he should've disclosed ownership b) also it's the law. If he is set to make more money out of certain products demonstrated on Andertons TV, we need to know.
Brilliant video, good work. Lee was just once FB earlier announcing an amp giveaway with a big thanks to the guys at Victory.
When they gave Pete a signature amp that’s when I realised that Victory is a bit too close with Andertons. I like Pete. I like Lee. And I like Andertons. But I’m not sure why the owners of Victory need to keep their identity a secret. It’s not as if those amps are being built off of prison slave labour like Peavey. They seem pretty solid amps and have a strong line up. Weird situation.
For some reason I already knew Victory was Anderton. Not sure what made it obvious anymore, but it was clear to me for some time.
At the very least I think UA-cam should force Lee (or others in similar situations) to disclose the video's he is doing as "sponsored" if they own any part of the product or products in the video.
It's flagrant abuse of the UA-cam advertising rules. All videos featuring any brands in which Lee Andertons or Andertons has a stake should be flagged as adverts - because that's what they are. You can't objectively review something you have a financial interest in.
Wow, amazing research and video as always man. These conflicts of interest are highly problematic. Superb effort in bringing this to light 🤘
man, you should write dissertions on stuff. your research path is very transparent and understandable. all question that pop up in my head, you answer right after.. and you answer even more things i didn't think about at that moment and that is.. so satisfying for my pseudo-autistic brain.
also, the instrument wall is really very symmetrical and well lit. lit, i say.
and man, that fretless bass.
Yeah, Lee's lack of disclosure is weird
b/c no one would have cared. He seems like a righteous dude and he's handled this WAY better than a lot of YT celebs so I'm happy to still be able to rock with Anderton's but keep it above board moving forward, yeah?
Well, I think he should still publicly disclose this, on their own channel in video form.
@@mrcoatsworth429 agreed
@@flashpointnova I have no problem with Lee, I really enjoy the videos and especially his dynamic with all the other team members. It is simply weird that he seems to actively avoid talking about his ownership of the brand. Just seems fishy, even if it may not be intentional.
I’m pretty sure I’ve heard Lee mention he was involved with Victory before this video…
@@louissanderson719 Involved as in being friends and somehow working together with them sure. Owning them? Absolutely not. And that's important, in my opinion, for the reasons mentioned in the video.
It's called a "lie of omission". It's clearly purposeful to prevent perceived bias. Thanks P.I KDH! 😁
But is it illegal? 🤔
@@Ebbandflow805 It certainly can be. It depends on the motive, consequences,and the "damage" it can and could cause (and how many lawyers your company has) It's always illegal morally. At least in my definition of morality.
KDH, given the recent introduction of Victory's high end line of MK Overdrive and MK Clean series that are $5K and up, are these also built by Straightedge! They are marketed as if Martin Kidd (MK) is personally building these. Does anyone know how this mysterious company is operating
This is great work. Really really well done and the whole guitar community benefits from this stuff.
I cant imagine a world where someone cares.
If you buy shares in any publicly listed company you become a co-owner. Does that make you part of their operations ? Same same if you're part of a consortium of investors for a private company, no ?
Since Victory amps started to frequently appear in Anderton's videos I just naturally assumed that it was a house brand. Nevertheless I wouldn't have guessed the actual complexety behind it all and KDH once again delivers in clearing things up!
Me too, I've never heard of them until I kept seeing them on Andertons videos
Never liked Andertons .. they seem to me to be fake.
You're fake
They're into sales, so of course they're pushing their own products. They sell fake and try to make it "real."
Honestly, it doesnt even matter. Theyre giving you a demo video on the product, people like what they hear, they buy it. They dont like what they hear, they move on.
Theres countless of videos on so many different amps and guitars people have interest in from looking on GC, SW, Zz, Anderton or anywhere on the internet like on tiktoks or instagram reels.
Lets be real. You just sound petty and envious really.
I’ve always considered Andertons videos as showcase rather than review, they sell the products and are thus by definition not “independent reviews”. They probably should disclose any involvement, but its not something that bothers me. Having Lee have a statement at the start of every PRS video saying “I am friends with the owner and he once gave me and some of my staff members a free guitar” will be annoying.
Besides my own comment THIS nails it for me, too. Cheers!
Your free to make up your own mind, but there is a world of difference between someone being given a gift from the owner of a company and someone having a direct financial interest in you purchasing one product over another.
Try “I am a co-owner of this company whose amp I am about to compare against other amps”
I am sure you can see the difference between “they send me a guitar for free” and “I co-own the company I compare vs. other amp makers”.
@@Sobchak2 True, but his statement is different - it is just a showcase. Listen, watch, make up you mind. Who owns it doesn't matter. Ok, only if in a comparison someone wilfully makes some amp sound bad.
I'm still too new to guitar to even think about an amp bigger than my practice amp or an amp sim, let alone learn about them, but let me tell you i was 100% invested in this bit of sleuthing. Good work.
Apply the patterns thing fully then? Lee has multiple connections to several companies and is very open and pro active about stating his involvement. Therefore its is a safe assumption to make that the reasons Lee has for not shouting Victory involvement from the roof tops are not nefarious. I think his response is very consistent and says he basically helped a friend out at the start and since then has gotten a much more passive role , which I suspect does not exceed a small dividend. Also maybe its a matter of respect for Martyn.
Cornford amps were a highly respected brand, and maybe Lee holds Martyn as a figure that should be respected and maybe felt the world did not need to know the details of his involvement, partly because what he claims is likely true and is the dynamic described, and maybe there is deeper stuff. Maybe he is also saving face for his friend a little and allowing Martyn to rebirth himself and his amp career and receive the shine he feels he deserves? Maybe Lee does not wish to upstage his friend?
Honestly I dont think you have "uncovered" anything other than what most of the guitar world assumed. In this instance, whilst I get that you are talking abut a principle you feel has been crossed, I think this is an exception to the rule moment and you have basically looked for the sinister where there is nothing of the sort. Lee's other company involvements are enough to indicate that, like you yourself said..."we are looking for patterns" so don't ignore the most obvious pattern just so it fits you narrative? (I don't think you did this consciously, but I do think your motivation is content)
Great video! You really do your homework and don't just go for drama. You are becoming Guitarzilla (which is meant as a compliment, in case you are not a fan of him 😁). Keep at it.
I will watch Lee's response in a bit, but I imagine he appreciates what you do as well even if you call him out like this.
US viewer here that Really enjoys your videos. Thorough and evenhanded. Not in a million years would I have predicted I'd find the intrigue of the UK music gear scene so compelling! Well done, KDH
I don't really see how it's a big conspiracy. And i think you have to understand how business are taxed as well as people, to better understand the distance one takes on claiming this that or the other regarding a company they own or a company owned by a company a person owns. If that makes any sense?
I see a lot of people (or at least a few) commenting that they always assumed he was part of Victory. I can safely say that thought never crossed my mind. Not once. I've always found the Andertons YT-channel to be good fun as well as trustworthy. I've always understood that at the end of the day, running a youtube channel had to make sense for them financially, so of course there had to be some element of sales in it. I have always felt that that part was fairly obvious. I remember seeing the Burns video and being pleased that he disclosed his involvement. Same with the Chapman stuff. Builds trust, makes you able to account for any bias.
Honestly, I'm pretty disappointed to see that for whatever reason the Victory involvement was kept a secret. And I'd argue intentionally so, given the clip where both Mick Taylor and Rob Chapman disclose their relationship with the company. There's no way he didn't make an active choice to not say anything at that point.
It's a shame. I really like their channel. I don't think I'll stop watching their stuff - overall I still feel they are pretty fun and honest people, but I can't say I won't be wondering what they aren't telling me the next time I tune in to one of their videos.
They don't make sales to support the UA-cam channel, they do the UA-cam channel to sell you stuff!
I would replace “honest” with “creative at not saying anything negative about any product ever”. It actually makes even more fun to watch, looking out for exactly those phrases
Mick Taylor has his fingers in a lot of pies too, which is fair enough. However I stopped watching the Pedal Show when I realised they were just constantly plugging products and tbh I don’t regard either of them as experts anyway, just enthusiasts with strong opinions, giving the impression they are experts. JHS, Vertex and Wampler channels is where I’d go for expertise.
@@glenh2752I met D & M in Minnesota once and thought they were arrogant aholes. Pretty disappointing that many of these guys have a great “friendly” personality on camera and you find out they are not at all what they portray. Sounds like LA is a bit of a shrewd operator and not the open/honest guy he has built his YT following on.
@@S-T-E-V-Egosh! No way!!! Jeeeez……..
I always felt that they have been promoting victory amps quite intesively, like even more than other amps..now we know why
Very good work but I can't get overly excited about this one. I think Lee's point that he's not a director/managing partner isn't unreasonable. Owning a stake probably should've been declared yes. I'm just not sure I see it as a big gotcha.