2015 Toyota Camry XSE 0-60 MPH Test Video - 2.5 Liter 178 Horsepower
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 вер 2024
- www.autobytel.c... The 2015 Toyota Camry XSE is powered by a 2.5 liter 4-cylinder engine that makes 178 horsepower and 170 lb-ft. of torque. The transmission is a 6-speed automatic. A best 0-60 MPH acceleration test time of 8 seconds was accomplished with the Transmission set to “Sport” and the Traction Control turned “Off”
See More Car Videos
www.autobytel.c...
Join Our Facebook Page
/ autobytel
Nice job doing this with the engine cold
And at 5000 feet above sea level.
+ExactlyPrecisely that not cold for a toyota.
First and second runs were a little cold
Outside temp -7 did you read that?
@Random Autonomous Drone Pilot 😂
VVT-i just kicked in yo lol
VVT-i kicks in from the moment you turn the key lmao
Lol
I have the V6 & it's a blast!
As much we all hate Toyota due to boringness, at least they are the shining light in a world where CVTs reign supreme.
lol
These 0-60 tests are fun to watch, and if you're talking Mustangs, Camaros, Challengers etc they mean allot more than they do with the family sedans. They give you bragging rights and boost testosterone levels that are already too high. I have a 2016 LE with the 2.5L and it flies up on the highway with ease and it has plenty left for passing. Wonderful car. Thanks for the review.
For a second, I thought the title said "2015 Toyota Camry XSE 0-60 MPH Test Video - 2.5 Seconds"
The I-4 gets 35 mpg highway, while the V-6 gets only 31 mpg highway. Is 2 seconds less from 0 - 60 worth a loss of 4 mpg on the highway, day-in and day-out? Normally I would say 'Yes', but when you look at all of the cops that will bust your butt for doing more than 9 mph over the limit, you cannot even use all of the power that the I-4 gives to you, so the extra oomph of the V-6 is totally wasted, unless you want to lose your driver's license and insurance from too many speeding tickets.
Honesty Counts Of course, expect moms to get the v6 anyway for those errends that need a supersonic powerplant.
8 seconds ain't bad for a 4 Cylinder with an automatic
my first car was 0-60 in 12 and I thought it was 4..
Believe me, this stock 4 cylinder Camry will run with the V6 Mustangs and Camaros from the colonies, and it won't break down. This is not an economy car, it is a sports sedan, seating 4 adults in total comfort. All of this for less than $25000!
+George McKean The modern Mustangs and Camaros are much faster. Don't kid yourself.
Mad Pisser, I guess you know little about modern automobiles.
You're too funny, kid.
+Mad Pistol, I used to be ignorant too.. being ignorant can be dangerous but sure will make you feel better in life. Don't worry, they need to be ignorant. You are right. The evidence is all over UA-cam if they just bothered to look.
Anthony Abelardo ignorance is bliss, but knowledge is power.
Why when I google 2015 Camry it say 200 hp
mike muniz 178
This is a 2ar fe motor right
Yes!
what about the v6 ?? :P
MR. .PePsiman expect about 5.7-6 seconds, with about a 4mpg loss.
In the upper 5 to low 6 second range maybe.
Try turning the Eco off. Test it again pls
Eco doesn't affect performance. The Eco light is just an indicator that you are driving efficiently.
+ARentz07 yes it does effect the performance, its like making the car accelerate little slower/laggish thingy and you can feel the power difference when you use eco for 1month then switch to turning the eco off for 1month, you will feel the difference. Thats what I experience
Romel Jacob As an owner of one year and 16,000 miles of the 2015 Camry SE, I can confirm it does not make a difference.
+ARentz07 as a owner of 2016 toyota camry, I can tell and feel the difference, maybe something wrong with your car Or our car have been program differently
Romel Jacob I pretty much always drive with it off. Could be that I haven't driven in so long? Who knows. Either way, the setting even says "Eco *Indicator", not "Eco Mode".
If you look in the manual, try searching for "Eco Mode". Doesn't exist. On page 81, it goes over what the eco driving indicator light does. www.toyota.com/t3Portal/document/om-s/OM33A86U/pdf/OM33A86U.pdf
Now, I will say "S" mode versus "D" mode makes a huge difference, especially if you're driving fast or using the paddles. However, that's not the same as turning off the eco indicator.
The last run sucked
Try running it on premium fuel with eco off
Eco doesn't actually do anything - it's just an indicator light to let you know that you're driving in an efficient manner.
Also, why use premium? The car is not designed for it.
Have you looked at the compression ratio? The fuel requirements is 87 octane minimum, which means it can run on premium for more performance.
I've read blogs and articles and watched videos all over the internet saying it's *usually* a waste to buy premium unless it is recommended or required by the manufacturer. Just do your due diligence and look around. In this case, the car requires 87 octane but does not make any statement that using premium fuel would provide a benefit. Besides, premium costs about 25% more than regular at the moment.
I am curious what the compression ratio (10.4:1 for the 2.5 engine) has to do with it.
+ARentz07 Higher compression pistons extract more energy out of premium fuel for more power. If a motor has low compression pistons for example 9.6:1 then using premium fuel would be a waste. The Camry v6 is the exact motor that comes in a Lexus IS with the same compression ratio, but Lexus specifies premium. There are claims where people have gotten more power out the Camry with premium. There are also tests with better 0-60 times using premium. This Camry should be doing 7.5 seconds to 60.
Not bad for 175 hp economy car!
+LT4GAMING I have the LE and it's a beautiful car. Zips up on the highway with ease, passing is a breeze.
LT4GAMING *178
This is supposed to be an economy car not a race car.
He is testing them
Exactly, 0-60 runs on a car these this is totally pointless. They actually change the throttle pedal curve to not be linear so it can actually feel fast enough on the street. If you want more it just won't give much more. You want more from say an AMG or BMW, you leave most cars behind on command.
@@antdx316 I believe you, but where did you hear that? I figured they'd change the gear ratio to make it taller for better mileage on the highway and less response around town.
Don’t start on s 4 start on a 1
Andres
IKR, How can he do that mistake
Secondly he’s doing it on a cold engine
@@waterlevelroute no but by starting in first you get more torque
@@waterlevelroute okay
dat wheel spin...
Camry 2015 Vs Kia Cerato 2016
This car is a lot faster with the V6!
Really? I totally thought the v6 would be slower -___-
flyinbrianvids lol -_________-
That's like saying "birds can fly"!
Ivan Vojt No its not. Just because a car has more cylinders doesn't mean it'll be a lot faster. Look at the v8 Genesis, its only .3 seconds faster than the v6 Genesis. In Camry you're shaving off about 2 seconds. Not all V6/Turbo I4 cars are 2 seconds faster than their natural I4 counterparts.
The thing is when he did in sports Mode
He was doing it on S4 instead of S1
Rmp was high it went to 6
Rpm
not good
Not a race car idiot
0-60 for a 2012-2015 Camry V6 is 5.7 sec. Can you not test the 4 cylinder. Nobody cares about that. Thx
Speak for yourself. 80% of Camrys are 4 cylinder
Slow as balls compared to the competition.
I'm sorry that you're wrong because the Nissan Altima is 10 times slower and then what the Camry is. The fastest in compition is the honda accord. second comes the camry and third is the the malibu.
+tungol00 Well it still fails. Accord does it in 7.5 seconds and still gets better MPG at 27/37.
tungol00 Okay then, edmunds says 6.2 for the Camry and 6.1 for the Accord and Camry's 31 MPG highway are 3 MPG short of Accord's 34 MPG. Like I said, fail.
Rizwan Javed Edmunds suck
+tungol00 Hondas engines are better than Toyota's. They put out more HP, get better MPG's and last just as long.