I live in the UK, and I'm curious if I were to state that "Jesus Had The Right Attitude With The Money Lenders In The Temple," whether I could be convicted for advocating violent behaviour?
I am a Catholic priest. It is immoral to not protect your family. The bishop of the diocese (area) in which I serve prohibits the posting of 30.06 and 30.07. Some churches have uniformed police on payroll and church security groups, but everyone has the right and responsibility to protect his or her own self. I've never heard of the website this article comes from. This is kind of like believing the New York Times represents the views of America. There are priests, bishops, and even popes who would advocate non-violence, but that is personal opinion, not church teaching.
@@COIcultist I sort of imagine what the "headline" would have been like had the internet existed 2000 years ago. It would read something like "Local religious zealot arrested/crucified for spreading misinformation". See, nothing ever changes. There is nothing new under the sun. God Himself, the victim of cancel culture.
Problem is that they have metal detectors and almost TSA like security on way into the park. Is the fair worth the hassle of trying to carry through that? Previously those with LTCs were past around the metal detectors but not right now. Note last year (or was it a couple years ago) they had a kid (prohibited person) somehow get a gun in and shoot two people. I think this instance is great example of how safe licensed carriers are - as there were probably several in the same space. Those private individuals recognize they are not police, that shooting stopped before they could have reacted, and that shooting in a crowd presents extra hazards. Far as I’ve heard, none of those people legally carrying presented their weapons - and they certainly not escalate the situation.
i don't remember the 12/christ being vegetarians so you're also disarming/starvation of the mass's aka usa-Catholic forgot ranchers/farmers/dairy/poultry and wild-food sources like duck/deer ect ram's/lamb, so that's also hypocrisy's for a Catholic/umc-ect
I am a Catholic priest. It is immoral to not protect your family. The bishop of the diocese (area) in which I serve prohibits the posting of 30.06 and 30.07. Some churches have uniformed police on payroll and church security groups, but everyone has the right and responsibility to protect his or her own self. I've never heard of the website this article comes from. This is kind of like believing the New York Times represents the views of America. There are priests, bishops, and even popes who would advocate non-violence, but that is personal opinion, not church teaching.
@@Kenobi-vu9mb ...you obviously completely missed the point. and you are also a spam bot... or a fed. youre the only ones with these fake ass usernames followed with a hyphen and random numbers and letters. the point of my comment was if you still vote, then you allow the government to walk all over your inalienable rights. you are 2 steps behind little boy.
The dumbest thing is the ATF doesn't even give a shit if you tell them there's somebody making a suspicious number of purchases. We had a guy come in and buy 6 Glock 19s. I'm like "okay, that's kind of weird but whatever." Next week guy comes in and tries to buy 6 MORE Glock 19s. I tell him we don't have anymore, send him to another shop down the road. Call the shop, they know the guy cos he went into their shop last week and bought a bunch of Glocks. We tell the ATF and local PD like "yo, this guy bought at least 12 of the same model handgun" and their response was "keep selling them to him but keep his 4473s at hand in case we need them." Sure as shit, a month later they need the 4473s cos one of the guns was used in a robbery where a gas station attendant got shit. They refuse to investigate actually suspicious purchases but they'll sure as shit kick in doors for FRTs.
@@Firedrake1313 Weird how you only read just enough to find that but not enough to understand what it was actually talking about. Even weirder that you didn’t mention that the Bible, which you refused to spell out, was pretty much the inspiration for getting rid of slavery in the west.
Note, fuzzy memory here. During Obama a Texas man was convicted in Austin, Tx Federal Court for not recognizing an illegal because he spoke English poorly and wore western wear, or maybe cowboy boots. That guy was making sales in defiance of Federal law is what brought this about as I recall. Then there was a family in New Mexico that got hammered on some BS ancillary charge when the gun charges failed. That prosecutor was nominated to a Federal bench. Senator John Cornyn blew off my email on that nomination.
I love your take on mental illness, I am a licensed counselor and it's important to know that "mental illness" is significantly more gray then most people think and it's important to hold everyone accountable for their actions because if people believe that there will be big consequences behavior will change.
@toddtravis2596 I've heard that song, it's great. I really like both Tyson and Bryson. They have another one it's a couple of years older under Tyson James called 2A that's even better (imo) if you haven't heard that one
"Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin." Is it good to protect yourself and those around you if you are capable of doing so? There you go.
The Texas State Fair story is too familiar. Kentucky has a firearms preemption act, KRS 65.870. It prevents local governments from passing their own anti-2A ordinances that would create a patchwork of gun laws across the state that would be nearly impossible for a citizen to navigate. It was a simple law but there were no consequences for violating 65.870 so the local control freaks ignored it and did whatever they liked in their little fiefdoms. We'd sue, and usually win... eventually... and they'd take down their No Gun signs for a year and the next administration would put them right back up again. We got sick of this nonsense. In 2012, some 2A folks found a state legislator willing to fix the problem. 65.870 was amended to add penalties for this specific official misconduct... up to a year in jail. It's doubtful a politician would be sentenced to a year in jail, but it's difficult to be reelected when found guilty of official misconduct. 65.870 went from two sentences to more than a page. My contribution was a clause prohibiting local governments from hiring companies that would create anti-2A policies when administering local government events. I'd dealt with that tyranny for years. The Lexington Fayette Urban County Government would hire the Downtown Lexington Corporation (their crony pals, the local government version of the persistent deep state) to manage every event. The DLC would create a rule stating that nobody could bear arms in the 4th of July Parade (patriots call it the Independence Day Parade) and that anti-2A corporate rule would be enforced by LFUCG police paid with my tax dollars. That's specifically illegal now. Fighting tyrants is so frustrating. The various forms of immunity typically make them completely immune to prosecution for violating our rights per 42 U.S. Code § 1985.
I don’t know like There has to be something because if they don’t get hit harder they just keep breaking laws. You could just ignore the signs and keep a copy pf that specific law with your carrying permit in case people try to say some yahoo supersedes the constitution and state law.
Never had a bishop of my diocese advocate for gun control, at least to my knowledge. Most priests I know do advocate for peace and tolerance, etc in a much more extreme fashion than normal folks, especially in an individual level, but the idea of just war is deeply Catholic and collective ownership isn't, and shouldn't, explicitly discouraged because the benefits have become apparent other time. Given our rather hostile history with fascist and communist governments during the 20th, and our own history with abuse of power, I don't expect that to change in any broad way. If the throne of St. Peter can't be trusted with a monopoly in violence, how could any other government hope to be worthy of it.
Christain need to be told to evangelize for self defense. After all Jesus calls them to speak in such times as these.. I mean these tons in the Bible about Christain being strong and fighting tyranny and corruption. Peace doesn't mean weak
The clergy has has a very strong socialist stance for a lifetime now. Just look at the problems in central/south America connected to the church (what, can't google the news stories? Huh...must be like that megabusiness really is good at covering its tracks). While not explicitly communist per-say, the modern church is VERY socialist.
I'm a practicing Catholic. I've gone to the gun range multiple times with priests and fellow Catholic friends. It is not a sin to own and carry a gun. Murder is a sin. Defending yourself is not. It doesn't mean you won't feel guilt if you need to use it to defend you or loved ones, but it isn't a sin.
@@ianfoltin All deaths are NOT equal. It should be obvious to any rational person. First scenario: On the one hand you have a person that intentionally seeks to kill an innocent person with premeditation using deadly force. Second scenario: On the other hand, you have an innocent person that is the intended victim of an attacker using deadly force, the defender prevails and stops the bad guy from killing the defender by killing the attacker while using deadly force. The first scenario is a crime (is immoral), the second scenario is justified use of deadly force and NOT a crime (is not immoral). Seems REALLY simple to me.
It’s important that we remember that in the Garden of Gethsemane the Bible doesn’t tell us whether or not Jesus had a sword, but we do know that the man on his right did.
Ok. Practicing Catholic here. Can tell you that I’ve never heard any priest or bishop ever preach for gun control, but my local diocese wanted no guns inside the church. I had a conversation with my pastor, explaining to him that I’m a concealed carrier, and he told me he was fine, so long as I kept carrying concealed.
That’s all well and done, but unfortunately, as an institution, the Church has repeatedly shown that they are NOT on our side. I don’t really think the church cares much about our constitutional rights in general.
Catholic here. Bishops can be political and they can be wrong. Father said to me once “live like a medieval peasant. They didn’t know the pope or the bishops name, not to mention what they were saying” so if they’re saying silly things, I ignore them.
Well, that's not exactly Catholic theology. Collectively the bishops, the magisterium of the church, has teaching authority, so you are obligated to listen to ecumenical councils. You should also allow your conscience to be formed by the teaching authority of your local bishop. Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition have the greatest weight, so we can measure teachings against those. However, the personal opinion of a single bishop on a matter outside of faith and morals is not binding. "More like guidelines."
This is rapidly getting to be my favorite 2A news channel... Also, I am Catholic and Bishops that advocate for gun control or not owning guns, are full of crap. (p.s., my priest loves to talk about and show his newest firearm purchase...Retired Army Chaplin as he is...)
As a Román Catholic I consider my duty to protect my family and community (just as the right to bear arms) as one imposed by God himself and no amount of corrupt men can best Him. Martyrdom is not the same as suicide, suicide is a capital sin indeed and being unable to protect yourself in this time and age is paramount to suicidal.
“He said to them, ‘But now, he who has a money bag, let him take it, and likewise a knapsack; and he who has no sword, let him sell his garment and buy one.’”
Which just proves Ken Paxton is a joke, because he's supposed to file criminal charges, not beg a judge to tell them to stop breaking the law or pay a fine by reaching into taxpayer pockets.
Jesus said to turn the other cheek because of the fact that a backhand slap from a Roman was done as to demonstrate they were someone subservient or subordinate, while a slap with the palm was a sign that you were considered their equal, such as would carry much later into days of honor duels, where one approached as an equal would be slapped with an open palm, while someone of lesser standing would be backhanded. It was also more insulting to be backhanded as it presumed one inferior or lesser.
This is an interesting idea...🤔 What would be the implementation, that one would turn their head to the right presenting their left cheek to be slapped? I don't know when the concept of right and left came into being, but I guess maybe one might say "this is my hand" for their right hand, and "this is my other hand" for their left hand. So then your "other cheek" would be the left one? Obviously, left handed people could exist, but they would be looked down on in any regimented formations because they throw things off, right? That's why we still have a certain disdain for left handed people today, even if it is a joke anymore.
@@jacob.tudragens That is the interpretation that I always thought, but the idea shared here makes a certain amount of sense as well depending on how they used the terms.
Here's my theological question: if you think Christianity prevents you from carrying a gun to protect others, what do you do when confronted by evil? Do you let someone hurt innocents so you can say you did the Christian thing? If someone is going to choose to put others lives at risk, why is it wrong to prevent them from carrying that out? I think it's far more Christian to protect innocent life, even if that requires killing someone who already chose to put others lives at risk.
Christianity runs the gamut from pacifist to the extreme to suicide cult. What you think right now is 2000 years of people reading translations, interpretations, justifications, propaganda, counter-propaganda, theological debates and cultural shifts. Christ the Shepard, Christ the judge, Christ the companion. Romans thought Christianity was a cannibal death cult following a criminal. Which it is both theologically and (mostly) literally correct. Sacrament is ritually consuming the body and blood of Christ(and early on there were cults that... lost something in translation). Death and resurrection is the theme and goal. And by Roman law, Christ was a rebel. There were cults early on that would repeatedly and rabidly attack caravans for the purpose of getting themselves killed which led to the major churches classifying suicide a sin. Christian history is absolutely wild.
Luke 22:35-38 New International Version 35 Then Jesus asked them, “When I sent you without purse, bag or sandals, did you lack anything?” “Nothing,” they answered. 36 He said to them, “But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. 37 It is written: ‘And he was numbered with the transgressors’[a]; and I tell you that this must be fulfilled in me. Yes, what is written about me is reaching its fulfillment.” 38 The disciples said, “See, Lord, here are two swords.” “That’s enough!” he replied.
When they came to arrest Jesus, Simon Peter drew his sword... a sword that he had been carrying the whole time, a sword that Jesus the son of God was well aware his disciple was carrying... and chopped a guy's ear off trying to stop them. Jesus stopped Simon Peter, telling him to sheath his sword, that this was supposed to happen. Jesus didn't freak out that Simon Peter had a sword or that he had attacked someone with it. He didn't tell Simon Peter to throw it away or to surrender it to the authorities. Jesus told him to sheath it, as in to keep it. And it wasn't illegal for people traveling cross country in Roman held territories to have weapons because there were so many bandits, and the Romans didn't mind civilians thinning out the bandit numbers for them. Carrying a weapon in larger cities was discouraged, but the Romans actually encouraged travelers to be armed. I point the latter out because some people, Jews especially, have a habit of claiming they were armed just to get Jesus arrested, as if having weapons at all was illegal. Context is important, as is knowing actual history and not some fabricated version used to support an agenda. Orwell warned us about that.
They were armed to get Jesus arrested. He needed to look like a rebel leader with guards so that he would be taken into custody and judged. When he did not answer questions during the trial, he was sentenced to be crucified. This lead to the resurrection and his revelation as the son of God. I am not Jewish or even religious. I just know how to read a story, and this one doesn't lend any credence or support to our 2A rights with the parroting of Luke 22:36. It's just being used as a misleading sound bite.
@@whelper4231then what about thr money bag and knapsack? You were there or did you read between the lines and come up with your own conclusion based on your indifference to both religion and the bill of rights?
@@klpittman1 I may have an indifference to religion, but I fully support the 2nd Amendment. The purse and knapsack were to show a difference to the last time he sent them out in poverty with no money, shoes, or unnecessary belongings. Again, the guys were there to make it look like Jesus wasn't really the pious man he claimed to be. He needed to look like he was walking around outside of public view in town with armed mercenaries or thugs for protection. This is why they were meeting alone, in the dark of night to make this plan for the walk.
Catholic bishops? The ones who don’t get married and give advice on marriage? And let’s just forget about the diddiling scandals. Yeah, the chance of me listening to any of them is zero
@@themightycrixus1131 fact, it’s not a tenant. Catholics don’t hold a patent on that. The local dances with snakes Baptist church is in hot water for multiple kinds of abuse. But, don’t forget Canon law prohibits a priest from disclosing what a diddler says in confession. (Clergy or Joe off the street, makes no never mind) And you have to admit, they’ve gotten the most bad press over it, so…
Happens just as much with Protestants, they are just much more broken up than the Catholic Church. That said it is absolutely disgraceful that it's even one priest. You want to look at a real travesty of a cover up though, look at the abuse rate in public schools. Also on your first statement, Jesus want married yet he gave a pretty explicit law on marriage. Saint Paul wasn't married and wrote extensively on the duties of husband and wife. All this said bishops are certainly not infallible and say some pretty stupid crap, especially the leftist ones who infiltrated the Church.
@@DrD0000M when you live a perfect life then you can start judging others. Once again; child diddling is not a catholic tenant. You go to hell for such things priest or not. Also do you really think "pastors" dont do the same? I know of several.
I am catholic and in Luke 22:36 He “But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. this was when he was leaving to be killed and they would now need these to defend themselves and others. so basically yes i have guns and with use them if nesasary
I have pointed out Luke to Catholics and Christians but until I showed it to them in my Bible they were skeptical. Ruling elites have brainwashed many Churches. Time to revive the Crusader spirit.
I was raised as Catholic. In my teenage years I started reading the Bible. In short, I am a sword maker and I sold my Cloak. Now I own "Many Swords" 😉😉 Once you are taught what the Bible really means, I believe one will defend their Family, Friends and them selves from Evil. Defense from Evil is what it is about.
🤷♂️ If we're going to have the left try to use morals to argue against owning firearms just remember this is the same group that says no one is right or wrong and we should tolerate each other's different morals (moral relativism).
Is It IMMORAL To Own A Gun? Absofuckinlutely NOT! How can someone be more moral that to go to the brink of life and death (a deadly force encounter, where your life or that of another person(s) is(are) in an imminent threat of death or great bodily harm) for a moral imperative of self-defense or defense of another innocent life?
Jesus himself used a whip on people to cleanse the temple. Jesus used violence to stop sinful behavior that was not, itself, violent. Jesus was not a pacifist.
Actually with the law and the letter from the AG any prosecutor who took the cas and the LE office could be personally civilly liable for unlawful arrest
What did Jesus's apostille do when the Guards came to arrest him? He drew his sword and with one swipe took the guards ear off, then warned him to take another step. Jesus willingly allowed himself to be tortured and killed. .🤣
I think we need to broaden our scope as 2A supporters, and even further beyond that. The 2A says you can bear arms, which means you should be able to own anything that can defend you from someone trying to oppress you. Not just oppression, either; we need to be saying it shouldn’t be illegal to own anything. It’s just an extra charge and an excuse to shaft people with the law. The crime should come from how something is used, not whether or not someone owns it. Secondly, we need to be addressing what really causes violence - lack of parent/community involvement emphasizing the innate value of human life. There are all sorts of studies on what environmental factors cause violence and it usually stems from not having a religious figure to fall back on. They want to blame psychopathy or sociopathy, but the thing is those conditions are only to blame when the idea to do something so heinous couldn’t have come from anywhere else. These insane people are being pummeled with the idea that their neighbor is a threat by the news (because of the guy they vote for) while simultaneously being shown through social media political violence will be tolerated, no matter what comes out of the mouths of the TV talking pieces, because their idea of “no tolerance” is cash-free bail and catch&release.
When Cain killed Abel with a rock I believe if Abel had a gun the story being told would be quite different, don't you? the Pope is guarded by the most elite Swiss Military officers in the world, I'm sure Jesus would turn the other cheek and approve.
I think what the Texas Fair is banking on is that it will take time for anything to be done about their illegal rule, so they'll at least be able to hold the fair under "their" rules this year. Next year is another question, but I don't think they really care about that.
3:04 "Turn the other cheek" _does not_ mean to submit to what ever indignity someone wants to force on you. It means to have the strength to stay in the fight and take as many blows as necessary while you are giving some at the same time.
Same here. I got so sick of the Church as I got older, especially as the Pope became more and more of a politician pandering to the left. I will also never forgive the church for being neutral in WWII and the GWOT. I am now a non-denominational Christian. I hate to say it, but any Catholic today must admit to themselves that the church is NOT an ally to our community, or the fight to preserve the Constitution in general.
Nobody on the left is going to dictate morality to me.
Amen to that! True dat!
No shit! They can GFT.
Yeah, Catholics are SERIOUSLY left...
🤣🤣
GD ABSOLUTELY RIGHT
They will dictate the Bill of Rights to us!
As my combat veteran Catholic chaplain said “ sometimes a gun is all evil understands”.
@Losantiville There it is! Thank You, Sir.
This comment should be pinned to the top.
Evil doesn't think about much more than power, and they fear when good has power to stop them.
I'm a practicing Catholic. It is immoral NOT to protect your family.
I live in the UK, and I'm curious if I were to state that "Jesus Had The Right Attitude With The Money Lenders In The Temple," whether I could be convicted for advocating violent behaviour?
Yeah pretty scummy that they use the name of one of my favorite prayers to peddle this modernist clap trap.
Catechism CCC 2265, I had it pasted directly, but alas, TPTB removed it.
I am a Catholic priest. It is immoral to not protect your family. The bishop of the diocese (area) in which I serve prohibits the posting of 30.06 and 30.07. Some churches have uniformed police on payroll and church security groups, but everyone has the right and responsibility to protect his or her own self.
I've never heard of the website this article comes from. This is kind of like believing the New York Times represents the views of America. There are priests, bishops, and even popes who would advocate non-violence, but that is personal opinion, not church teaching.
@@COIcultist I sort of imagine what the "headline" would have been like had the internet existed 2000 years ago. It would read something like "Local religious zealot arrested/crucified for spreading misinformation". See, nothing ever changes. There is nothing new under the sun. God Himself, the victim of cancel culture.
Concealed carry everywhere. I choose to break unconstitutional "laws" every day rather than be a defenseless victim.
Problem is that they have metal detectors and almost TSA like security on way into the park. Is the fair worth the hassle of trying to carry through that?
Previously those with LTCs were past around the metal detectors but not right now.
Note last year (or was it a couple years ago) they had a kid (prohibited person) somehow get a gun in and shoot two people. I think this instance is great example of how safe licensed carriers are - as there were probably several in the same space. Those private individuals recognize they are not police, that shooting stopped before they could have reacted, and that shooting in a crowd presents extra hazards. Far as I’ve heard, none of those people legally carrying presented their weapons - and they certainly not escalate the situation.
I mean
They don’t investigate shootings anymore so if you have to do it just keep your mouth shut and make it look like a robbery.
To discourage your flock from being able to protect itself is immoral!
and to do so through the church is in effect in the lords name, which is blasphemous.
Jesus did warn us about false prophets,and wolves in sheep's clothing!
Im trying to be the Shepard, Ringo
i don't remember the 12/christ being vegetarians so you're also disarming/starvation of the mass's aka usa-Catholic forgot ranchers/farmers/dairy/poultry and wild-food sources like duck/deer ect ram's/lamb, so that's also hypocrisy's for a Catholic/umc-ect
I am a Catholic priest. It is immoral to not protect your family. The bishop of the diocese (area) in which I serve prohibits the posting of 30.06 and 30.07. Some churches have uniformed police on payroll and church security groups, but everyone has the right and responsibility to protect his or her own self.
I've never heard of the website this article comes from. This is kind of like believing the New York Times represents the views of America. There are priests, bishops, and even popes who would advocate non-violence, but that is personal opinion, not church teaching.
My RIGHTS are NOT NEGOTIABLE
If you vote, you allow them to be negotiable.....spam bot.
@@ceebee2555If you don't vote, it doesn't matter since the state is deep in the pockets of fearmongers and corporations that want more state power.
@@Kenobi-vu9mb ...you obviously completely missed the point. and you are also a spam bot... or a fed. youre the only ones with these fake ass usernames followed with a hyphen and random numbers and letters. the point of my comment was if you still vote, then you allow the government to walk all over your inalienable rights. you are 2 steps behind little boy.
The dumbest thing is the ATF doesn't even give a shit if you tell them there's somebody making a suspicious number of purchases. We had a guy come in and buy 6 Glock 19s. I'm like "okay, that's kind of weird but whatever." Next week guy comes in and tries to buy 6 MORE Glock 19s. I tell him we don't have anymore, send him to another shop down the road. Call the shop, they know the guy cos he went into their shop last week and bought a bunch of Glocks. We tell the ATF and local PD like "yo, this guy bought at least 12 of the same model handgun" and their response was "keep selling them to him but keep his 4473s at hand in case we need them." Sure as shit, a month later they need the 4473s cos one of the guns was used in a robbery where a gas station attendant got shit.
They refuse to investigate actually suspicious purchases but they'll sure as shit kick in doors for FRTs.
They care when they care otherwise they don’t care.
Wait, doesn’t buying multiple handguns in a single transaction get you an automatic courtesy visit from the AFT??
@@michaelprather8371not a visit, just reported. Extra paperwork.
No. It necessitates a form.
@@ARFCOMNewsyep, a 3310.4
If it's immoral to own guns, does that mean government and"law enforcement"(the king's men)are immoral?
They are, but for slightly different reasons.
You misspelled treason😂
Unless it's been stolen or something, there's nothing immoral about owning anything.
Except for religous iconography that isn't of the one true god.
They are Christian after all.
I wouldn't say anything... I would argue owning other human beings would be immoral... 😅
@@HammondArmory. Weird how rules for doing exactly that are in the buybull....
@@Firedrake1313 Weird how you only read just enough to find that but not enough to understand what it was actually talking about. Even weirder that you didn’t mention that the Bible, which you refused to spell out, was pretty much the inspiration for getting rid of slavery in the west.
Is owning a sex slave not immoral to you? 😡
Note, fuzzy memory here. During Obama a Texas man was convicted in Austin, Tx Federal Court for not recognizing an illegal because he spoke English poorly and wore western wear, or maybe cowboy boots. That guy was making sales in defiance of Federal law is what brought this about as I recall. Then there was a family in New Mexico that got hammered on some BS ancillary charge when the gun charges failed. That prosecutor was nominated to a Federal bench. Senator John Cornyn blew off my email on that nomination.
I love your take on mental illness, I am a licensed counselor and it's important to know that "mental illness" is significantly more gray then most people think and it's important to hold everyone accountable for their actions because if people believe that there will be big consequences behavior will change.
There was a Catholic priest in Missouri with a Concealed Carry license. He was the victim of a brutal assault and robbery.
As a Christian, I can say that just because I have a Bible doesn't mean I don't have a gun. Love you long time Andrew!
Check out the song "gun totin' Bible thumper" 👍🏽💪🏾👊🏾🙏🏽🧡🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@toddtravis2596 I've heard that song, it's great. I really like both Tyson and Bryson. They have another one it's a couple of years older under Tyson James called 2A that's even better (imo) if you haven't heard that one
Every WWJD forgets Jesus Christ flipping tables and chasing people with a whip
....and the Lord said "if you dont own an AR sell your cloak and buy one"
Dame, that's a sweet jacket.
I believe the original verse said “sword” but the sentiment is the same.
@@SupHapCak with Psa you can keep your jacket and buy a sword
"Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin."
Is it good to protect yourself and those around you if you are capable of doing so? There you go.
The Texas State Fair story is too familiar. Kentucky has a firearms preemption act, KRS 65.870. It prevents local governments from passing their own anti-2A ordinances that would create a patchwork of gun laws across the state that would be nearly impossible for a citizen to navigate. It was a simple law but there were no consequences for violating 65.870 so the local control freaks ignored it and did whatever they liked in their little fiefdoms. We'd sue, and usually win... eventually... and they'd take down their No Gun signs for a year and the next administration would put them right back up again. We got sick of this nonsense. In 2012, some 2A folks found a state legislator willing to fix the problem. 65.870 was amended to add penalties for this specific official misconduct... up to a year in jail. It's doubtful a politician would be sentenced to a year in jail, but it's difficult to be reelected when found guilty of official misconduct. 65.870 went from two sentences to more than a page. My contribution was a clause prohibiting local governments from hiring companies that would create anti-2A policies when administering local government events. I'd dealt with that tyranny for years. The Lexington Fayette Urban County Government would hire the Downtown Lexington Corporation (their crony pals, the local government version of the persistent deep state) to manage every event. The DLC would create a rule stating that nobody could bear arms in the 4th of July Parade (patriots call it the Independence Day Parade) and that anti-2A corporate rule would be enforced by LFUCG police paid with my tax dollars. That's specifically illegal now.
Fighting tyrants is so frustrating. The various forms of immunity typically make them completely immune to prosecution for violating our rights per 42 U.S. Code § 1985.
I don’t know like
There has to be something because if they don’t get hit harder they just keep breaking laws.
You could just ignore the signs and keep a copy pf that specific law with your carrying permit in case people try to say some yahoo supersedes the constitution and state law.
"The right of the people, to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed"
Of course they think they're allowed to restrict gun owners
Never had a bishop of my diocese advocate for gun control, at least to my knowledge. Most priests I know do advocate for peace and tolerance, etc in a much more extreme fashion than normal folks, especially in an individual level, but the idea of just war is deeply Catholic and collective ownership isn't, and shouldn't, explicitly discouraged because the benefits have become apparent other time. Given our rather hostile history with fascist and communist governments during the 20th, and our own history with abuse of power, I don't expect that to change in any broad way.
If the throne of St. Peter can't be trusted with a monopoly in violence, how could any other government hope to be worthy of it.
a fair and reasonable statement.
Christain need to be told to evangelize for self defense. After all Jesus calls them to speak in such times as these.. I mean these tons in the Bible about Christain being strong and fighting tyranny and corruption. Peace doesn't mean weak
The clergy has has a very strong socialist stance for a lifetime now. Just look at the problems in central/south America connected to the church (what, can't google the news stories? Huh...must be like that megabusiness really is good at covering its tracks). While not explicitly communist per-say, the modern church is VERY socialist.
These are all true statements.
And lo, Jesus then said "If you do not have an AR-15, sell your Winter Parka and BUY One!"
NO ONE gets to force their ethics or morality on ANY ONE in this country... it is called LIBERTY!
It’s immoral to not own a gun
I'm a practicing Catholic. I've gone to the gun range multiple times with priests and fellow Catholic friends. It is not a sin to own and carry a gun.
Murder is a sin. Defending yourself is not. It doesn't mean you won't feel guilt if you need to use it to defend you or loved ones, but it isn't a sin.
exactly
Jesus wanted his people to carry swords for protection
@@ianfoltin
All deaths are NOT equal. It should be obvious to any rational person.
First scenario: On the one hand you have a person that intentionally seeks to kill an innocent person with premeditation using deadly force.
Second scenario: On the other hand, you have an innocent person that is the intended victim of an attacker using deadly force, the defender prevails and stops the bad guy from killing the defender by killing the attacker while using deadly force.
The first scenario is a crime (is immoral), the second scenario is justified use of deadly force and NOT a crime (is not immoral).
Seems REALLY simple to me.
Depends on which translation of Gods word you read. "Thou shall not kill" says what it says.
@@ALovelyBunchOfDragonballzit doesn’t say kill. It says murder.
I’m a catholic and I am encouraged by my church to carry a pew daily.
Old school churches do it best
Good to hear! It's important for congregations to push back against nonsense from the pulpit.
It’s important that we remember that in the Garden of Gethsemane the Bible doesn’t tell us whether or not Jesus had a sword, but we do know that the man on his right did.
I am catholic and screw gun control
Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition. Lol
I❤U
Ok. Practicing Catholic here. Can tell you that I’ve never heard any priest or bishop ever preach for gun control, but my local diocese wanted no guns inside the church. I had a conversation with my pastor, explaining to him that I’m a concealed carrier, and he told me he was fine, so long as I kept carrying concealed.
That’s all well and done, but unfortunately, as an institution, the Church has repeatedly shown that they are NOT on our side. I don’t really think the church cares much about our constitutional rights in general.
"Those of you without a carbine, sell your playstation and purchase one."
Nothing more moral than owning gun.
an exercise of free will, the most absolute foundational things in Christianity.
There's nothin moral or immoral in having gun.
@@sinisterthoughts2896 Well, yes it is (first part). Just, not everything done with your free will is good for someone's soul.
Swords are awesome; but for close quarters, I prefer a pew...
@@skootr924Could do both, practicing swordfighting is a neat physical activity, and keeping a gun for self defense outside of home...
Is it moral to defend our families? Our heads will only turn so much. You are right. Half the members of our local church carry.
Should they? Absolutely any Christian or other religion should be able to defend themselves
Catholic here. Bishops can be political and they can be wrong. Father said to me once “live like a medieval peasant. They didn’t know the pope or the bishops name, not to mention what they were saying” so if they’re saying silly things, I ignore them.
Well, that's not exactly Catholic theology. Collectively the bishops, the magisterium of the church, has teaching authority, so you are obligated to listen to ecumenical councils. You should also allow your conscience to be formed by the teaching authority of your local bishop. Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition have the greatest weight, so we can measure teachings against those. However, the personal opinion of a single bishop on a matter outside of faith and morals is not binding. "More like guidelines."
@@warrenphilips8441 correct but unless it’s dictated and not just a written or spoken opinion, it’s not binding or even recommended.
That’s just fine for you but it leaves you unarmed when trying to defend yourself agains corruption.
I'm catholic and I carry everyday.
It's immoral to not own a ....er many guns!
This is rapidly getting to be my favorite 2A news channel... Also, I am Catholic and Bishops that advocate for gun control or not owning guns, are full of crap. (p.s., my priest loves to talk about and show his newest firearm purchase...Retired Army Chaplin as he is...)
As a Román Catholic I consider my duty to protect my family and community (just as the right to bear arms) as one imposed by God himself and no amount of corrupt men can best Him.
Martyrdom is not the same as suicide, suicide is a capital sin indeed and being unable to protect yourself in this time and age is paramount to suicidal.
“He said to them, ‘But now, he who has a money bag, let him take it, and likewise a knapsack; and he who has no sword, let him sell his garment and buy one.’”
The Texas State Fair will probably be over before the lawsuit even gets to a judge. 😔
Which just proves Ken Paxton is a joke, because he's supposed to file criminal charges, not beg a judge to tell them to stop breaking the law or pay a fine by reaching into taxpayer pockets.
😢😢😢 @@barfo281
I’m Catholic, and I carry.
Thumbs for the AFTs Most Hated News, and the best hated news host!
I was Ken Paxton. I'd have the judge's license remo ed and have hi. Jailed under treason charges
Jesus said to turn the other cheek because of the fact that a backhand slap from a Roman was done as to demonstrate they were someone subservient or subordinate, while a slap with the palm was a sign that you were considered their equal, such as would carry much later into days of honor duels, where one approached as an equal would be slapped with an open palm, while someone of lesser standing would be backhanded. It was also more insulting to be backhanded as it presumed one inferior or lesser.
Spot on. I've preached this exact point in homilies.
This is an interesting idea...🤔
What would be the implementation, that one would turn their head to the right presenting their left cheek to be slapped?
I don't know when the concept of right and left came into being, but I guess maybe one might say "this is my hand" for their right hand, and "this is my other hand" for their left hand. So then your "other cheek" would be the left one?
Obviously, left handed people could exist, but they would be looked down on in any regimented formations because they throw things off, right? That's why we still have a certain disdain for left handed people today, even if it is a joke anymore.
"Turning the other cheek" is meant to show the offending party that the first slap was not warranted, but they have a chance now to apologize.
@@jacob.tudragens That is the interpretation that I always thought, but the idea shared here makes a certain amount of sense as well depending on how they used the terms.
Here's my theological question: if you think Christianity prevents you from carrying a gun to protect others, what do you do when confronted by evil? Do you let someone hurt innocents so you can say you did the Christian thing? If someone is going to choose to put others lives at risk, why is it wrong to prevent them from carrying that out? I think it's far more Christian to protect innocent life, even if that requires killing someone who already chose to put others lives at risk.
Christianity runs the gamut from pacifist to the extreme to suicide cult.
What you think right now is 2000 years of people reading translations, interpretations, justifications, propaganda, counter-propaganda, theological debates and cultural shifts. Christ the Shepard, Christ the judge, Christ the companion.
Romans thought Christianity was a cannibal death cult following a criminal. Which it is both theologically and (mostly) literally correct.
Sacrament is ritually consuming the body and blood of Christ(and early on there were cults that... lost something in translation).
Death and resurrection is the theme and goal.
And by Roman law, Christ was a rebel.
There were cults early on that would repeatedly and rabidly attack caravans for the purpose of getting themselves killed which led to the major churches classifying suicide a sin.
Christian history is absolutely wild.
idk why these "people" think they can dictate my rights to me
Because so many have been letting them for so long. It's no different than any other cult.
Luke 22:35-38
New International Version
35 Then Jesus asked them, “When I sent you without purse, bag or sandals, did you lack anything?”
“Nothing,” they answered.
36 He said to them, “But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. 37 It is written: ‘And he was numbered with the transgressors’[a]; and I tell you that this must be fulfilled in me. Yes, what is written about me is reaching its fulfillment.”
38 The disciples said, “See, Lord, here are two swords.”
“That’s enough!” he replied.
As a Catholic, God Wills It!!!!
When they came to arrest Jesus, Simon Peter drew his sword... a sword that he had been carrying the whole time, a sword that Jesus the son of God was well aware his disciple was carrying... and chopped a guy's ear off trying to stop them. Jesus stopped Simon Peter, telling him to sheath his sword, that this was supposed to happen. Jesus didn't freak out that Simon Peter had a sword or that he had attacked someone with it. He didn't tell Simon Peter to throw it away or to surrender it to the authorities. Jesus told him to sheath it, as in to keep it.
And it wasn't illegal for people traveling cross country in Roman held territories to have weapons because there were so many bandits, and the Romans didn't mind civilians thinning out the bandit numbers for them. Carrying a weapon in larger cities was discouraged, but the Romans actually encouraged travelers to be armed. I point the latter out because some people, Jews especially, have a habit of claiming they were armed just to get Jesus arrested, as if having weapons at all was illegal. Context is important, as is knowing actual history and not some fabricated version used to support an agenda. Orwell warned us about that.
They were armed to get Jesus arrested. He needed to look like a rebel leader with guards so that he would be taken into custody and judged. When he did not answer questions during the trial, he was sentenced to be crucified. This lead to the resurrection and his revelation as the son of God.
I am not Jewish or even religious. I just know how to read a story, and this one doesn't lend any credence or support to our 2A rights with the parroting of Luke 22:36. It's just being used as a misleading sound bite.
@@whelper4231then what about thr money bag and knapsack? You were there or did you read between the lines and come up with your own conclusion based on your indifference to both religion and the bill of rights?
@@klpittman1 I may have an indifference to religion, but I fully support the 2nd Amendment.
The purse and knapsack were to show a difference to the last time he sent them out in poverty with no money, shoes, or unnecessary belongings. Again, the guys were there to make it look like Jesus wasn't really the pious man he claimed to be. He needed to look like he was walking around outside of public view in town with armed mercenaries or thugs for protection. This is why they were meeting alone, in the dark of night to make this plan for the walk.
Good thing I'm a Protestant
I'm a practicing Catholic... yes I carry every Sunday.
Catholic bishops? The ones who don’t get married and give advice on marriage? And let’s just forget about the diddiling scandals. Yeah, the chance of me listening to any of them is zero
Child diddling is not a Catholic tenant. Settle down
@@themightycrixus1131 fact, it’s not a tenant. Catholics don’t hold a patent on that. The local dances with snakes Baptist church is in hot water for multiple kinds of abuse.
But, don’t forget Canon law prohibits a priest from disclosing what a diddler says in confession. (Clergy or Joe off the street, makes no never mind)
And you have to admit, they’ve gotten the most bad press over it, so…
Happens just as much with Protestants, they are just much more broken up than the Catholic Church. That said it is absolutely disgraceful that it's even one priest. You want to look at a real travesty of a cover up though, look at the abuse rate in public schools. Also on your first statement, Jesus want married yet he gave a pretty explicit law on marriage. Saint Paul wasn't married and wrote extensively on the duties of husband and wife. All this said bishops are certainly not infallible and say some pretty stupid crap, especially the leftist ones who infiltrated the Church.
@@themightycrixus1131 "By their fruits ye shall know them." Matthew 7:16
@@DrD0000M when you live a perfect life then you can start judging others. Once again; child diddling is not a catholic tenant. You go to hell for such things priest or not. Also do you really think "pastors" dont do the same? I know of several.
For the AlGoreRhythym 💪 🤙 🇺🇲
I am Catholic, and I don't know any others in my home town that didn't own a gun.
I am catholic and in Luke 22:36 He “But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. this was when he was leaving to be killed and they would now need these to defend themselves and others.
so basically yes i have guns and with use them if nesasary
I have pointed out Luke to Catholics and Christians but until I showed it to them in my Bible they were skeptical. Ruling elites have brainwashed many Churches. Time to revive the Crusader spirit.
It's thou shalt not MURDER not thou shalt not kill. huge difference.
@prongATO EXACTLY! This has been lost "in translation ".
Yup, mistranslated centuries ago.
I was raised as Catholic. In my teenage years I started reading the Bible. In short, I am a sword maker and I sold my Cloak. Now I own "Many Swords" 😉😉
Once you are taught what the Bible really means, I believe one will defend their Family, Friends and them selves from Evil. Defense from Evil is what it is about.
Defense of life is a Christian moral duty
As a catholic, my only shame is that none of my guns have a crucifix or Saint Michael the archangel on it
I sold all my cloaks.
🤷♂️ If we're going to have the left try to use morals to argue against owning firearms just remember this is the same group that says no one is right or wrong and we should tolerate each other's different morals (moral relativism).
@@EyeKnowRaff good point.
Loved the Bear Independent clip!
Is It IMMORAL To Own A Gun?
Absofuckinlutely NOT!
How can someone be more moral that to go to the brink of life and death (a deadly force encounter, where your life or that of another person(s) is(are) in an imminent threat of death or great bodily harm) for a moral imperative of self-defense or defense of another innocent life?
Practicing Catholic here and that article sounds like a very fringe view within Catholicism as I know it.
There’s a Bible verse where it says if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloth and buy a sword in the New Testament
Luke 22:36
In the deep south, religion and guns go together like poop and toilet paper.
Im catholic there is a evil wing in our church however god made his one true church to withstand evil and chaos
Jesus himself used a whip on people to cleanse the temple. Jesus used violence to stop sinful behavior that was not, itself, violent. Jesus was not a pacifist.
He didn't just use a whip. He made His own whip.
Catholic here, I’ve sold many a cloak for many a sword.
@@Krieg1337 this guy knows his New Testament…amen
Boycott the State Fair.
Just shut it down.
👍👍 For the memes alone! Thank you for the news!
keep up the good work!!
2A SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.......
Actually with the law and the letter from the AG any prosecutor who took the cas and the LE office could be personally civilly liable for unlawful arrest
What did Jesus's apostille do when the Guards came to arrest him? He drew his sword and with one swipe took the guards ear off, then warned him to take another step. Jesus willingly allowed himself to be tortured and killed. .🤣
I think we need to broaden our scope as 2A supporters, and even further beyond that.
The 2A says you can bear arms, which means you should be able to own anything that can defend you from someone trying to oppress you.
Not just oppression, either; we need to be saying it shouldn’t be illegal to own anything. It’s just an extra charge and an excuse to shaft people with the law. The crime should come from how something is used, not whether or not someone owns it.
Secondly, we need to be addressing what really causes violence - lack of parent/community involvement emphasizing the innate value of human life.
There are all sorts of studies on what environmental factors cause violence and it usually stems from not having a religious figure to fall back on. They want to blame psychopathy or sociopathy, but the thing is those conditions are only to blame when the idea to do something so heinous couldn’t have come from anywhere else.
These insane people are being pummeled with the idea that their neighbor is a threat by the news (because of the guy they vote for) while simultaneously being shown through social media political violence will be tolerated, no matter what comes out of the mouths of the TV talking pieces, because their idea of “no tolerance” is cash-free bail and catch&release.
When violent sociopath are kept in jail, then violent sociopath will be defined as speeder
4:58 Skull shaped what now?
I support this message... every week... every... week.
Just here for the engagement algorithm. Can't beat the price point for these videos! Keep it up.
Andrew has been running those Vortex red dots hard since before lunch! 😂
When Cain killed Abel with a rock I believe if Abel had a gun the story being told would be quite different, don't you? the Pope is guarded by the most elite Swiss Military officers in the world, I'm sure Jesus would turn the other cheek and approve.
I think what the Texas Fair is banking on is that it will take time for anything to be done about their illegal rule, so they'll at least be able to hold the fair under "their" rules this year. Next year is another question, but I don't think they really care about that.
The mini me shooting the Barrett had me crying! 😂🤣😂🤣😂😆
Yay! Propaganda!
only the best!
At this point in our history its immoral not to own a gun
3:04 "Turn the other cheek" _does not_ mean to submit to what ever indignity someone wants to force on you. It means to have the strength to stay in the fight and take as many blows as necessary while you are giving some at the same time.
Wanting to defend yourself, your home and your and family isn't immoral.
Violence averted with NO SHOTS FIRED IN OAKLAND, news says he "pulled gun on crowd" lol.....
3:43 So nicely said Mr. Andrew!
(Delivery, brevity, to the point… chefs kiss!)
Thank you.
Communists POPE...
Of course...GOD will take care of Him !
funny, the Swiss guard is armed to the gills but the church says guns are immoral. I see a hypocrisy, me thinks.
Imagine trying to ban guns…in TEXAS.
I grew up Catholic and left the faith when I left the house! The hypocrisy was unbearable.
Like many things, when you create perverse incentives, you will get bad outcomes.
Same here. I got so sick of the Church as I got older, especially as the Pope became more and more of a politician pandering to the left. I will also never forgive the church for being neutral in WWII and the GWOT. I am now a non-denominational Christian. I hate to say it, but any Catholic today must admit to themselves that the church is NOT an ally to our community, or the fight to preserve the Constitution in general.
It is immoral to not own a gun
The lawsuit against the 3 gun stores is illegal under PLCAA. Those bringing the lawsuit must be arrested and imprisoned for violating it.
I have been told puppy meat tastes like bald eagle.
As a raised, non practicing catholic, I was taught that it is only right to defend yourself. Leathally if necessary.
Matthew 10:34. Luke 22:36.
To be honest, those skull shaped bullets look awesome. I wouldn’t trust them in my firearm. Maybe a little display box.
I love you too, man. The outtakes are funny.
Thank you.