No freedom expression for Kashmiri people .All the basic rights are taken away.people living Under pressure. Fear is always there.No one talkings Kashmiri issues. No party raising any concer n.Now is the time to focus Kashmiri problems. Bring the right Solutions Kashmiri problems.
Why Should India and Pakistan Be Divided into Multiple Nation-States India (Republic of India) didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1861. Turkey didn't exist before 1922, Germany didn't exist before 1871, Saudi Arabia didn't exist before 1932 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 18th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms everywhere around world. Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Denmark, Poland, Switzerland, Slovenia, Netherlands, lechesiten etc were created after fall of 1000 yrs old Holy Roman empire in 1806. Italy and Germany were created in 1861 and 1871 by merging various small kingdoms of Italian and German nationality. Similarly all European countries were created based on their respective nationalities after the fall of empires and kingdoms across Europe. After the fall of the 600 yrs long Ottomans empire in 1922, many countries were created based on their nationalities.Saudi Arabia didn't exist When Prophet Muhammad was born in Mecca.Turkey was created in 1923 and Saudi Arabia was created in 1932 after the fall of Ottomans Empire in 1922. Europe and Middle East was united under various empires and kingdoms for most of the history just like India. India was the name for the region east to river Indus. It was never a country before 1947 but a region or subcontinent where various empires and kingdoms existed just like in Europe, Middle East or other parts and continents of world. Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Arabs, Persian, Kurds, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality or where a single nationality dominates culturally, politically, in economy and military is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe or 'civilised world' are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations. There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations or multinational countries. Nations are Punjab, Kashmir, sindh, Baluchistan, Gujarat, Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu etc. And in modern civilised world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities. Among the 650 major nations in the world, the nations in the union of India are one of the largest nations in the world. After Han Chinese Mandrain, Spanish, Anglo Saxons English, and Arabic Bengali - world's 5th largest nationality Punjabi- 10th largest nationality in world Marathi- 13th largest nationality in world Hindustani- 14th largest Telugu- 15th largest nationality Tamil- 17th largest nationality in world Gujarati- 24th largest nationality in world Bhojpuri- 25th largest Kannada- 29thth largest Malyalam- 30th largest Oriya- 32nd largest Maithili- 40th largest Awadhi- 46th largest Assamese- 65th largest Haryanvi, Marwari, Magahi, Deccan, etc in top 100 nationalities of world. (Hindi, Urdu are not nationalities but artificial languages developed from Hindustani language and imposed on some nations in some regions, with only few native speakers. These regions have their own nationalities and languages. Hindustani is a nationality in western Uttar pradesh with Hindustani as native language). Republic of India was created in 1947 out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities (unlike in rest of civilised world) but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions. On the other hand, Bangladesh is a nation state which was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971 (5th biggest nationality in world). No other nation in the British empire (except Bangla nation) got sovereignty and independence. The sovereignty of all nations changed hands from British empire to two newly created empires based on religions. British empire just transferred ownership rights in 1947. Three predominant civilisations in Republic of India, Indo Aryans, Dravidian and Sino Tibetic ( North East nations in the Republic of India) don't share anything although the first two civilisations share religion hence religion is the biggest binding force of the Indian Union followed by Military Power which is used to occupy non Hindu nations (Punjab, Kashmir, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya) with the Indian union. Most of Hindus in Indian subcontinent prefer religion over their nationalities unlike muslims (Kashmiri, Bangla, Baluch, Sindhi, Pashto) who identify themselves with their nationalities and even support nation states like Bangladesh. According to research, Higher ethnic or national diversity within a country negatively affects economic growth through conflict between interests of various nations or ethnicities (Don't confuse the ethnic or national diversity with the multiculturalism in west due to migration, the migrants mix with diverse society and become part of nationality of the host country and work for the interests of the dominant nationality). High 'nationality or ethnic' Diversity correlates with low GDP per capita. Strong democracy correlates with ethnic or national homogeneity. Punjab and Kashmir should be a free countries based on Punjabi and Kashmiri nationalities like Bangladesh. But Hindu Punjabis, Hindu Kashmiris and Muslim Punjabi don't want to leave unions of india and Pakistan, so Punjabi Sikhs, or Kashmiri muslims can't force them to follow to support the idea of Nation-States. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion. Similarly, Punjabi Muslims of Pakistan dont support Punjabi nation state either. They support Pakistan state that is based on Islam religion. Similarly, Bengali Hindus and Kashmiri Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and Azad Kashmir and want to live in Union of India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi muslims, Punjabi Hindus, Kashmiri Hindus and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to Bangla Muslims of East Pakistan, who created Bangla nation state Bangladesh without Indian Bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims (and Azad Kashmir without Kashmiri Hindus). As simple as that. We Punjabi Sikhs have no problem living in a Punjabi Muslims or Punjabi Hindu majority Punjabi nation state but non Sikh Punjabis don't support idea of nation-state unlike modern civilised world but a state based on religion. The Punjabi speaker population of Muslims is around 10 crore. Punjabi speaking population of Hindus is around 3 crore (Punjabi Hindus in Punjab, Himchal, Haryana, Jammu and Delhi). Punjabi speaker Sikh population is around 2 crore. Hence Sikhs would be minority if both Punjabi muslims and Hindus or either one of them come form a Punjabi nation state with us Sikhs. We Sikhs have no problem living as minority in Punjabi nation state among majority Punjabi muslims and Punjabi Hindus, But their radicals minds prefer religion over their nationality and they love to give up their Punjabi nationality and adopt Hindi and Urdu nationality in order to create a state based on their respective religions. So when Sikhs alone form a Punjabi nation state, it would automatically be a Sikh majority Punjabi nation state called Khalistan. What's in the name? We are open to change the name and keep it Punjab instead of Khalistan and also write the word secular state in constitution because it wouldn't change anything in practice. In practice it would still be Khalistan just like India is a Hindu rashtra in practice regardless of its official name or regardless of its constitution..
People in Kashmir are living under pressure and fear. There's no freedom of speech. People are suffocating here. A true and honest interview by MIRWAIZ SAHAB.
I do not think so. There are some agencies which do not want this issue resolved. They have to prove that Internally, these people are not supported by external power.
After some thousand decades a kashmiri has been allowed to speak like this. But most indians will hate it. For them kashmir matters as a peice of land but not kashmiris.
@@Anuragrai-mc6gk Yeah maturity is dripping. Look at the comments made by Indian hindus on this video. They start their sentence with stone pelting and end with stone pelting. Move on guys!!
Why Should India and Pakistan Be Divided into Multiple Nation-States India (Republic of India) didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1861. Turkey didn't exist before 1922, Germany didn't exist before 1871, Saudi Arabia didn't exist before 1932 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 18th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms everywhere around world. Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Denmark, Poland, Switzerland, Slovenia, Netherlands, lechesiten etc were created after fall of 1000 yrs old Holy Roman empire in 1806. Italy and Germany were created in 1861 and 1871 by merging various small kingdoms of Italian and German nationality. Similarly all European countries were created based on their respective nationalities after the fall of empires and kingdoms across Europe. After the fall of the 600 yrs long Ottomans empire in 1922, many countries were created based on their nationalities.Saudi Arabia didn't exist When Prophet Muhammad was born in Mecca.Turkey was created in 1923 and Saudi Arabia was created in 1932 after the fall of Ottomans Empire in 1922. Europe and Middle East was united under various empires and kingdoms for most of the history just like India. India was the name for the region east to river Indus. It was never a country before 1947 but a region or subcontinent where various empires and kingdoms existed just like in Europe, Middle East or other parts and continents of world. Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Arabs, Persian, Kurds, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality or where a single nationality dominates culturally, politically, in economy and military is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe or 'civilised world' are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations. There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations or multinational countries. Nations are Punjab, Kashmir, sindh, Baluchistan, Gujarat, Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu etc. And in modern civilised world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities. Among the 650 major nations in the world, the nations in the union of India are one of the largest nations in the world. After Han Chinese Mandrain, Spanish, Anglo Saxons English, and Arabic Bengali - world's 5th largest nationality Punjabi- 10th largest nationality in world Marathi- 13th largest nationality in world Hindustani- 14th largest Telugu- 15th largest nationality Tamil- 17th largest nationality in world Gujarati- 24th largest nationality in world Bhojpuri- 25th largest Kannada- 29thth largest Malyalam- 30th largest Oriya- 32nd largest Maithili- 40th largest Awadhi- 46th largest Assamese- 65th largest Haryanvi, Marwari, Magahi, Deccan, etc in top 100 nationalities of world. (Hindi, Urdu are not nationalities but artificial languages developed from Hindustani language and imposed on some nations in some regions, with only few native speakers. These regions have their own nationalities and languages. Hindustani is a nationality in western Uttar pradesh with Hindustani as native language). Republic of India was created in 1947 out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities (unlike in rest of civilised world) but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions. On the other hand, Bangladesh is a nation state which was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971 (5th biggest nationality in world). No other nation in the British empire (except Bangla nation) got sovereignty and independence. The sovereignty of all nations changed hands from British empire to two newly created empires based on religions. British empire just transferred ownership rights in 1947. Three predominant civilisations in Republic of India, Indo Aryans, Dravidian and Sino Tibetic ( North East nations in the Republic of India) don't share anything although the first two civilisations share religion hence religion is the biggest binding force of the Indian Union followed by Military Power which is used to occupy non Hindu nations (Punjab, Kashmir, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya) with the Indian union. Most of Hindus in Indian subcontinent prefer religion over their nationalities unlike muslims (Kashmiri, Bangla, Baluch, Sindhi, Pashto) who identify themselves with their nationalities and even support nation states like Bangladesh. According to research, Higher ethnic or national diversity within a country negatively affects economic growth through conflict between interests of various nations or ethnicities (Don't confuse the ethnic or national diversity with the multiculturalism in west due to migration, the migrants mix with diverse society and become part of nationality of the host country and work for the interests of the dominant nationality). High 'nationality or ethnic' Diversity correlates with low GDP per capita. Strong democracy correlates with ethnic or national homogeneity. Punjab and Kashmir should be a free countries based on Punjabi and Kashmiri nationalities like Bangladesh. But Hindu Punjabis, Hindu Kashmiris and Muslim Punjabi don't want to leave unions of india and Pakistan, so Punjabi Sikhs, or Kashmiri muslims can't force them to follow to support the idea of Nation-States. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion. Similarly, Punjabi Muslims of Pakistan dont support Punjabi nation state either. They support Pakistan state that is based on Islam religion. Similarly, Bengali Hindus and Kashmiri Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and Azad Kashmir and want to live in Union of India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi muslims, Punjabi Hindus, Kashmiri Hindus and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to Bangla Muslims of East Pakistan, who created Bangla nation state Bangladesh without Indian Bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims (and Azad Kashmir without Kashmiri Hindus). As simple as that. We Punjabi Sikhs have no problem living in a Punjabi Muslims or Punjabi Hindu majority Punjabi nation state but non Sikh Punjabis don't support idea of nation-state unlike modern civilised world but a state based on religion. The Punjabi speaker population of Muslims is around 10 crore. Punjabi speaking population of Hindus is around 3 crore (Punjabi Hindus in Punjab, Himchal, Haryana, Jammu and Delhi). Punjabi speaker Sikh population is around 2 crore. Hence Sikhs would be minority if both Punjabi muslims and Hindus or either one of them come form a Punjabi nation state with us Sikhs. We Sikhs have no problem living as minority in Punjabi nation state among majority Punjabi muslims and Punjabi Hindus, But their radicals minds prefer religion over their nationality and they love to give up their Punjabi nationality and adopt Hindi and Urdu nationality in order to create a state based on their respective religions. So when Sikhs alone form a Punjabi nation state, it would automatically be a Sikh majority Punjabi nation state called Khalistan. What's in the name? We are open to change the name and keep it Punjab instead of Khalistan and also write the word secular state in constitution because it wouldn't change anything in practice. In practice it would still be Khalistan just like India is a Hindu rashtra in practice regardless of its official name or regardless of its constitution.. N
No India🇮🇳, No Pakistan🇵🇰, No China🇨🇳. Kashmiri:- (iok) 1 lakh+ civilian 6600 pellets 300+ Women 1000+ Houses 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭. Silent Message from kashmir, Warna Masla Hoo jayai ga😭
Previously before 2019 he was saying there is no freedom of free will, expression etc. Now he is saying that Previously there was freedom but now there is no freedom
Bro if u r aware about the word COMPARISON then u would probably understand what he tried to say. In comparison to time before 2019, there was some sort of freedom of expression no ,after after expressing they were kept in prisons but after 2019 I don't think any kind of freedom of expression is being allowed. But we all know netowns 3rd law of nature........
I am still waiting wire coverage on Reasi attack, instead of single reporting on horrific attack,wire reporting on those who are behind such attack…so should not we think wire is running Pakistan agenda on Indian soil…
We completely understand the pain & deeply saddened over this unfortunate incident But brother you need to understand since 2019 JK is completely under control of Delhi govt, yahan parinda b par nhi mar sakhta Delhi ki marzi k bina JK is the world's militarized zone , how attacks like Reasi & Poonch are happening Who is responsible? Whose failure is it?
We Kashmiris are against all types of violences, we want to live peacefully. We are victimized on all fronts, we are being killed, jailed, maligned while doing some inhuman acts with the help of agencies and then blaming Kashmiris. Kashmir issue needs one time solution without beating around the bush.
There is no difference between India and Pakistan in terms of freedom of speech and expression these days. In India in India speaking against Hindu nationalism is a crime against country while in Pakistan speaking against establishment is animated towards the sovereignty in dignity of that country.
@@filmypopcorn8192....grow up buddy ....only 200 to 700 pandits were killed.....why r u talking only for them what about this ...haannn????.....Jammu Massacre (1947)October-November 1947: In the Jammu region, thousands of Muslims (estimates range from 20,000 to 237,000) were killed during communal violence that followed the partition of India. The violence involved local Hindu and Sikh groups, with alleged support from the forces of the Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir.Post-1947 Incidents1990sJanuary 21, 1990 - Gawakadal Massacre: At least 50 Kashmiri Muslims were killed when Indian security forces opened fire on protestors in Srinagar.March 1, 1990 - Zakoora and Tengpora Massacre: Between 33 and 51 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian security forces in Srinagar.January 25, 1990 - Handwara Massacre: 21 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by the Border Security Force (BSF) in Handwara.May 21, 1990 - Hawal Massacre: At least 70 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian paramilitary forces during a funeral procession in Srinagar.October 1, 1990 - Al-Faran Kidnappings: While primarily involving foreign tourists, the incident also led to the killing of local Muslim residents during subsequent clashes and operations.April 1993 - Bijbehara Massacre: Around 51 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian security forces in Bijbehara during a protest against the siege of the Hazratbal Shrine.2000sMarch 24, 2000 - Chattisinghpora Massacre: 35 Sikhs were killed in this massacre; during subsequent investigations, 5 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian security forces in a controversial encounter, alleged to have been framed as militants.August 1, 2000 .2010s2010 - Protests and Clashes: Over 100 Kashmiri Muslims were killed in clashes with Indian security forces during widespread protests in the Kashmir Valley.2016 - Post Burhan Wani Killing: Over 100 Kashmiri Muslims were killed during the protests and clashes following the death of militant leader Burhan Wani.
People of Kashmir actually have the anxiety about kashmir issue...bcz our people lies in Pakistan's admintered kashmir......so pakistan and india should adress the issue
Freedom of expression does not mean freedom from India. Kashmiris and narrative created by few media channels seems to be that Kashmir problem is that they need expression to join with Muslim brethren country Pakistani. This dream will not get fulfilled as there can be no further partition on basis of religion. Unless Kashmiri do not live like any other Indian citizen peace will always be lacking.
@@bhatbasit1119 Behave like Indian and there is no one to stop you being Indian. Every family will have differences but brothers don't kill the mother that feeds.
@@surge2vin thank you brother. I'm Indian and Indian is mine. My goal is just to make India the greatest. thinking, caring , feeling about every citizen is my prime obligation ❤️
Thank you wire for giving platform to anti national to carryon their agenda , you really doing great service to nation, souls of innocent Hindu dying in various attacks in Kashmir are admiring wonderful work done by wire by promoting anti national
For Kashmir to be truly free, every Kashmiri must raise their voice against violence. Stop calling g these terrorists as freedom fighters and Mujahideen They are actually cowards. Only cowards kill innocent civilians. If they were really freedom. Fighters they would be fighting the army face to face, not attack slyly like they do. Anyone who supports violence, makes excuses for them, justifies their actions or gives them a voice calling g them youth icon is party to the violence. Why do the leftists always give voice to smugglers, terrorists and those who act against the law.
Yes stone pelting incidents drastically came down ...no more friday hartals..shopkeepers freely opening their shops without any fear from separatists...unlike other states every citizen of jk getting benefit from ayushmaan bharat without investing a single pinny from his/her pockets.....but Arfa didn't like this...Although still problems are exist in kashmir but is improving ...l
India must take proper steps to resolve the problem.India and Pakistan fighting for Kashmir while China is taking advantage from both sides. Already China made pakistan as puppeet. Infia should have come forward to pak before China did but politics of religion and hatred has made everything opposite so far.
dont wory dear kashmiri....pakistani are coming to teach them in their own language....the language of gun...they will understand as usa and nato understand in afghanistan
U just tell a Kashmiri what u want but without any pressure or fear he will 100% tell we want freedom from India we want to live separate Freedom is our birth right bczz hindu and Muslims can never unit better is to live separate
Welfare and development of his people is NEVER his priority and that is what the people want. His only concern is Pakistan and what they esp his "well wishers" over there think. And that 👆 is completely unacceptable to anyone who has a normal mind Full Stop 🙏
Whatever you say doesn't make any sense. The biggest welfare that you can think for your people is Freedom. And that's what they are fighting for. For the future of Nation.
I have a question to him kashmiri population was totally under hurriyat command.if they don't want the locals people go for gun culture so when the condam gun culture and militant attacks why they donot boycott gun even they boycott election with mix up with jamat e islami now same jamat is requesting to contest elections,,
Where lies the problem I find it difficult to understand Actually India has had a problem with Kashmir since beginning which is persistent in character And the persistent nature alienate people of Kashmir from the rest of India Guthi ko suljana mtlb ? Like you take care of millions of Indians do own kashmiris as well sincerely Definitely you will see the change Isme riddle kaha pr h
This is not an interview but a monologue. Hurriyat supports negotiations with Pakistan and this is the Pakistani verison of Kashmir settlement because Pakistan knows that they can't fight us. Our position must never change PoK and China occupied Ladakh should be given to us and that's all that needs to be negotiatiated. 20 years that all it takes to reset a generation so this insurgency will end by the time we reach 2050 so just 25 year from now. But our position and posture must remain the same.
Why Should India Be Divided into Multiple Nation-States India (Republic of India) didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1861. Turkey didn't exist before 1922, Germany didn't exist before 1871, Saudi Arabia didn't exist before 1932 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 18th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms everywhere around world. Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Denmark, Poland, Switzerland, Slovenia, Netherlands, lechesiten etc were created after fall of 1000 yrs old Holy Roman empire in 1806. Italy and Germany were created in 1861 and 1871 by merging various small kingdoms of Italian and German nationality. Similarly all European countries were created based on their respective nationalities after the fall of empires and kingdoms across Europe. After the fall of the 600 yrs long Ottomans empire in 1922, many countries were created based on their nationalities.Saudi Arabia didn't exist When Prophet Muhammad was born in Mecca.Turkey was created in 1923 and Saudi Arabia was created in 1932 after the fall of Ottomans Empire in 1922. Europe and Middle East was united under various empires and kingdoms for most of the history just like India. India was the name for the region east to river Indus. It was never a country before 1947 but a region or subcontinent where various empires and kingdoms existed just like in Europe, Middle East or other parts and continents of world. Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Arabs, Persian, Kurds, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality or where a single nationality dominates culturally, politically, in economy and military is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe or 'civilised world' are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations. There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations or multinational countries. Nations are Punjab, Kashmir, sindh, Baluchistan, Gujarat, Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu etc. And in modern civilised world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities. Among the 650 major nations in the world, the nations in the union of India are one of the largest nations in the world. After Han Chinese Mandrain, Spanish, Anglo Saxons English, and Arabic Bengali - world's 5th largest nationality Punjabi- 10th largest nationality in world Marathi- 13th largest nationality in world Hindustani- 14th largest Telugu- 15th largest nationality Tamil- 17th largest nationality in world Gujarati- 24th largest nationality in world Bhojpuri- 25th largest Kannada- 29thth largest Malyalam- 30th largest Oriya- 32nd largest Maithili- 40th largest Awadhi- 46th largest Assamese- 65th largest Haryanvi, Marwari, Magahi, Deccan, etc in top 100 nationalities of world. (Hindi, Urdu are not nationalities but artificial languages developed from Hindustani language and imposed on some nations in some regions, with only few native speakers. These regions have their own nationalities and languages. Hindustani is a nationality in western Uttar pradesh with Hindustani as native language). Republic of India was created in 1947 out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities (unlike in rest of civilised world) but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions. On the other hand, Bangladesh is a nation state which was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971 (5th biggest nationality in world). No other nation in the British empire (except Bangla nation) got sovereignty and independence. The sovereignty of all nations changed hands from British empire to two newly created empires based on religions. British empire just transferred ownership rights in 1947. Three predominant civilisations in Republic of India, Indo Aryans, Dravidian and Sino Tibetic ( North East nations in the Republic of India) don't share anything although the first two civilisations share religion hence religion is the biggest binding force of the country followed by Military Power which is used to occupy non Hindu nations (Punjab, Kashmir, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya) with the country. Most of Hindus in Indian subcontinent prefer religion over their nationalities unlike muslims (Kashmiri, Bangla, Baluch, Sindhi, Pashto) who identify themselves with their nationalities and even support nation states like Bangladesh. According to research, Higher ethnic or national diversity within a country negatively affects economic growth through conflict between interests of various nations or ethnicities (Don't confuse the ethnic or national diversity with the multiculturalism in west due to migration, the migrants mix with diverse society and become part of nationality of the host country and work for the interests of the dominant nationality). High 'nationality or ethnic' Diversity correlates with low GDP per capita. Strong democracy correlates with ethnic or national homogeneity. Punjab and Kashmir should be a free countries based on Punjabi and Kashmiri nationalities like Bangladesh. But Hindu Punjabis, Hindu Kashmiris don't want to leave unions of india so Punjabi Sikhs, or Kashmiri muslims can't force them to follow to support the idea of Nation-States. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion. Similarly, Bengali Hindus and Kashmiri Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and Azad Kashmir and want to live in India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi Hindus, Kashmiri Hindus and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to Bangla Muslims of East Pakistan, who created Bangla nation state Bangladesh without Indian Bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims (and Azad Kashmir without Kashmiri Hindus). As simple as that
India has invested lakhs of crores in Kashmir for it's development..we have given roads, electricity, schools, colleges, govt jobs, railway station, airport, tourism, hospitals and what not for development of Kashmir..our Army has made innumerable sacrifices to protect Kashmir from militancy..and what Pakistan did in Kashmir..they have brainwashed and radicalised Kashmiri locals and given them stones, bombs and guns to fight against India..it's ehsaan faramoshi on part of people who still support pakistan despite getting so many perks and privileges from India..even in the wildest dreams of such people can they imagine Pakistan sustaining them with a begging bowl in their hand..Pakistan couldn't even sustain their own country..forget about POK..
Ur army has also made some inhumane activities. There is no need of funding, also we too pay taxes like all other Indians, koi bheek nhi mil rahe hai. Forget about pak think of ur own country first
@@Shah-zi3gh i seriously doubt if u r a Kashmiri..i have been to Kashmir many times...and locals there fully support India as they are educated enough to understand what is beneficial for them..siding with a rising nation like India or a beggar nation like pakistan
@@Goldensongs1 keep creating ur own happy world. I feel sad for u ppl that u r being fooled in this era by ur so called media. I think less than 1% of kashmiris would be happy with india including politicians. If u know kashmir Is the most militerised zone in the world, if kashmiris feel OK with india why so much forces?
i am from MP state 😊 or yaha hindu majorty me hai hume bhe spacial status chiye taki muslims ki jansankhyaa yaha na badhe. agar kashmir ko spacial status chiye kyuki vo ☪️ majorty me hai isliye😅
Dictatorship avi dekha kaha hai tumlog , esko Dictatorship nhi kehte hai , dictator to China ka xi jingping, Zara dekh to video ki muslim ke saath kya kya hota hai china me
@@amankumar55555 Modaniji is india's Xi, but yes Modaniji is few years behind Xi. China doesn't have a Muslim problem, China has an Uyghor problem, that's very different from having a Muslim problem, but I understand that Andh Bhakts don't care about fact or logic, they are injected with the supremacy injection & being told that not Hindus (Muslims, Christians,...) are the enemy,... the same been done by Hitler & Mosolini previously! That's how Power hungry Modaniji rules, just based on British Divide & Rule Bloody dirty politics 😑
Today's India belongs to Modi and Amit Shah while today's Pakistan belongs to establishment. Both the countries have retracted from the policies of the four fathers like Gandhi and Nehru in India and Jinnah in Pakistan.
Yeah we wish Nehru should have let Vallabhai Patelji handle the issue of Kashmir. Nehru withdrew forces and gave it to UN. He tied the hands of indians . Kashmir once capital of knowledge…it had great scholars and sharada university. May Kashmir find its old glory soon 🇮🇳
@@ayahuascaa9455 weather Kashmir belongs to India or Pakistan it will decided by sword only not someone's wish for aspiration. Weather Kashmir belongs to India or Pakistan it will be decided by sword only not someone's wish our aspiration.
@@aarifnabi6677our ancestors are same our DNA is same (including Pakistanis bangla and Afgan) what is provoking to pick up sword? Nail it down to that point. Ask yourself if that prevails over everything? Do you want Kashmir be another Afgan?
No freedom expression for Kashmiri people .All the basic rights are taken away.people living
Under pressure. Fear is always there.No one talkings Kashmiri issues. No party raising any concer n.Now is the time to focus Kashmiri problems. Bring the right
Solutions Kashmiri problems.
Why Should India and Pakistan Be Divided into Multiple Nation-States
India (Republic of India) didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1861. Turkey didn't exist before 1922, Germany didn't exist before 1871, Saudi Arabia didn't exist before 1932 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 18th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms everywhere around world. Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Denmark, Poland, Switzerland, Slovenia, Netherlands, lechesiten etc were created after fall of 1000 yrs old Holy Roman empire in 1806. Italy and Germany were created in 1861 and 1871 by merging various small kingdoms of Italian and German nationality. Similarly all European countries were created based on their respective nationalities after the fall of empires and kingdoms across Europe.
After the fall of the 600 yrs long Ottomans empire in 1922, many countries were created based on their nationalities.Saudi Arabia didn't exist When Prophet Muhammad was born in Mecca.Turkey was created in 1923 and Saudi Arabia was created in 1932 after the fall of Ottomans Empire in 1922. Europe and Middle East was united under various empires and kingdoms for most of the history just like India. India was the name for the region east to river Indus. It was never a country before 1947 but a region or subcontinent where various empires and kingdoms existed just like in Europe, Middle East or other parts and continents of world.
Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Arabs, Persian, Kurds, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality or where a single nationality dominates culturally, politically, in economy and military is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe or 'civilised world' are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations.
There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations or multinational countries. Nations are Punjab, Kashmir, sindh, Baluchistan, Gujarat, Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu etc. And in modern civilised world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities.
Among the 650 major nations in the world, the nations in the union of India are one of the largest nations in the world. After Han Chinese Mandrain, Spanish, Anglo Saxons English, and Arabic
Bengali - world's 5th largest nationality
Punjabi- 10th largest nationality in world
Marathi- 13th largest nationality in world
Hindustani- 14th largest
Telugu- 15th largest nationality
Tamil- 17th largest nationality in world
Gujarati- 24th largest nationality in world
Bhojpuri- 25th largest
Kannada- 29thth largest
Malyalam- 30th largest
Oriya- 32nd largest
Maithili- 40th largest
Awadhi- 46th largest
Assamese- 65th largest
Haryanvi, Marwari, Magahi, Deccan, etc in top 100 nationalities of world.
(Hindi, Urdu are not nationalities but artificial languages developed from Hindustani language and imposed on some nations in some regions, with only few native speakers. These regions have their own nationalities and languages. Hindustani is a nationality in western Uttar pradesh with Hindustani as native language).
Republic of India was created in 1947 out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities (unlike in rest of civilised world) but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions.
On the other hand, Bangladesh is a nation state which was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971 (5th biggest nationality in world). No other nation in the British empire (except Bangla nation) got sovereignty and independence. The sovereignty of all nations changed hands from British empire to two newly created empires based on religions. British empire just transferred ownership rights in 1947.
Three predominant civilisations in Republic of India, Indo Aryans, Dravidian and Sino Tibetic ( North East nations in the Republic of India) don't share anything although the first two civilisations share religion hence religion is the biggest binding force of the Indian Union followed by Military Power which is used to occupy non Hindu nations (Punjab, Kashmir, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya) with the Indian union. Most of Hindus in Indian subcontinent prefer religion over their nationalities unlike muslims (Kashmiri, Bangla, Baluch, Sindhi, Pashto) who identify themselves with their nationalities and even support nation states like Bangladesh.
According to research, Higher ethnic or national diversity within a country negatively affects economic growth through conflict between interests of various nations or ethnicities (Don't confuse the ethnic or national diversity with the multiculturalism in west due to migration, the migrants mix with diverse society and become part of nationality of the host country and work for the interests of the dominant nationality).
High 'nationality or ethnic' Diversity correlates with low GDP per capita.
Strong democracy correlates with ethnic or national homogeneity.
Punjab and Kashmir should be a free countries based on Punjabi and Kashmiri nationalities like Bangladesh. But Hindu Punjabis, Hindu Kashmiris and Muslim Punjabi don't want to leave unions of india and Pakistan, so Punjabi Sikhs, or Kashmiri muslims can't force them to follow to support the idea of Nation-States. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion. Similarly, Punjabi Muslims of Pakistan dont support Punjabi nation state either. They support Pakistan state that is based on Islam religion.
Similarly, Bengali Hindus and Kashmiri Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and Azad Kashmir and want to live in Union of India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi muslims, Punjabi Hindus, Kashmiri Hindus and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to Bangla Muslims of East Pakistan, who created Bangla nation state Bangladesh without Indian Bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims (and Azad Kashmir without Kashmiri Hindus). As simple as that.
We Punjabi Sikhs have no problem living in a Punjabi Muslims or Punjabi Hindu majority Punjabi nation state but non Sikh Punjabis don't support idea of nation-state unlike modern civilised world but a state based on religion.
The Punjabi speaker population of Muslims is around 10 crore. Punjabi speaking population of Hindus is around 3 crore (Punjabi Hindus in Punjab, Himchal, Haryana, Jammu and Delhi). Punjabi speaker Sikh population is around 2 crore. Hence Sikhs would be minority if both Punjabi muslims and Hindus or either one of them come form a Punjabi nation state with us Sikhs. We Sikhs have no problem living as minority in Punjabi nation state among majority Punjabi muslims and Punjabi Hindus, But their radicals minds prefer religion over their nationality and they love to give up their Punjabi nationality and adopt Hindi and Urdu nationality in order to create a state based on their respective religions.
So when Sikhs alone form a Punjabi nation state, it would automatically be a Sikh majority Punjabi nation state called Khalistan. What's in the name? We are open to change the name and keep it Punjab instead of Khalistan and also write the word secular state in constitution because it wouldn't change anything in practice. In practice it would still be Khalistan just like India is a Hindu rashtra in practice regardless of its official name or regardless of its constitution..
Right this is tru of kashmir everybody is disturb because every one want tok to kashmir issue
People in Kashmir are living under pressure and fear. There's no freedom of speech. People are suffocating here. A true and honest interview by MIRWAIZ SAHAB.
I do not think so. There are some agencies which do not want this issue resolved. They have to prove that Internally, these people are not supported by external power.
After some thousand decades a kashmiri has been allowed to speak like this. But most indians will hate it. For them kashmir matters as a peice of land but not kashmiris.
Please come out from your ignorance, Indian people are very mature, clever and peacelover, same blood flow through the most of kashmiries.
@@Anuragrai-mc6gk Yeah maturity is dripping. Look at the comments made by Indian hindus on this video. They start their sentence with stone pelting and end with stone pelting. Move on guys!!
@@suhaibhakeem those comments are made to those who support terrorism. Not for common people.
But what about those who faced exodus from Kashmir and never returned? Kashmiri pundit ???who was responsible, I suppose Kashmiri…
Why Should India and Pakistan Be Divided into Multiple Nation-States
India (Republic of India) didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1861. Turkey didn't exist before 1922, Germany didn't exist before 1871, Saudi Arabia didn't exist before 1932 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 18th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms everywhere around world. Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Denmark, Poland, Switzerland, Slovenia, Netherlands, lechesiten etc were created after fall of 1000 yrs old Holy Roman empire in 1806. Italy and Germany were created in 1861 and 1871 by merging various small kingdoms of Italian and German nationality. Similarly all European countries were created based on their respective nationalities after the fall of empires and kingdoms across Europe.
After the fall of the 600 yrs long Ottomans empire in 1922, many countries were created based on their nationalities.Saudi Arabia didn't exist When Prophet Muhammad was born in Mecca.Turkey was created in 1923 and Saudi Arabia was created in 1932 after the fall of Ottomans Empire in 1922. Europe and Middle East was united under various empires and kingdoms for most of the history just like India. India was the name for the region east to river Indus. It was never a country before 1947 but a region or subcontinent where various empires and kingdoms existed just like in Europe, Middle East or other parts and continents of world.
Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Arabs, Persian, Kurds, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality or where a single nationality dominates culturally, politically, in economy and military is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe or 'civilised world' are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations.
There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations or multinational countries. Nations are Punjab, Kashmir, sindh, Baluchistan, Gujarat, Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu etc. And in modern civilised world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities.
Among the 650 major nations in the world, the nations in the union of India are one of the largest nations in the world. After Han Chinese Mandrain, Spanish, Anglo Saxons English, and Arabic
Bengali - world's 5th largest nationality
Punjabi- 10th largest nationality in world
Marathi- 13th largest nationality in world
Hindustani- 14th largest
Telugu- 15th largest nationality
Tamil- 17th largest nationality in world
Gujarati- 24th largest nationality in world
Bhojpuri- 25th largest
Kannada- 29thth largest
Malyalam- 30th largest
Oriya- 32nd largest
Maithili- 40th largest
Awadhi- 46th largest
Assamese- 65th largest
Haryanvi, Marwari, Magahi, Deccan, etc in top 100 nationalities of world.
(Hindi, Urdu are not nationalities but artificial languages developed from Hindustani language and imposed on some nations in some regions, with only few native speakers. These regions have their own nationalities and languages. Hindustani is a nationality in western Uttar pradesh with Hindustani as native language).
Republic of India was created in 1947 out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities (unlike in rest of civilised world) but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions.
On the other hand, Bangladesh is a nation state which was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971 (5th biggest nationality in world). No other nation in the British empire (except Bangla nation) got sovereignty and independence. The sovereignty of all nations changed hands from British empire to two newly created empires based on religions. British empire just transferred ownership rights in 1947.
Three predominant civilisations in Republic of India, Indo Aryans, Dravidian and Sino Tibetic ( North East nations in the Republic of India) don't share anything although the first two civilisations share religion hence religion is the biggest binding force of the Indian Union followed by Military Power which is used to occupy non Hindu nations (Punjab, Kashmir, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya) with the Indian union. Most of Hindus in Indian subcontinent prefer religion over their nationalities unlike muslims (Kashmiri, Bangla, Baluch, Sindhi, Pashto) who identify themselves with their nationalities and even support nation states like Bangladesh.
According to research, Higher ethnic or national diversity within a country negatively affects economic growth through conflict between interests of various nations or ethnicities (Don't confuse the ethnic or national diversity with the multiculturalism in west due to migration, the migrants mix with diverse society and become part of nationality of the host country and work for the interests of the dominant nationality).
High 'nationality or ethnic' Diversity correlates with low GDP per capita.
Strong democracy correlates with ethnic or national homogeneity.
Punjab and Kashmir should be a free countries based on Punjabi and Kashmiri nationalities like Bangladesh. But Hindu Punjabis, Hindu Kashmiris and Muslim Punjabi don't want to leave unions of india and Pakistan, so Punjabi Sikhs, or Kashmiri muslims can't force them to follow to support the idea of Nation-States. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion. Similarly, Punjabi Muslims of Pakistan dont support Punjabi nation state either. They support Pakistan state that is based on Islam religion.
Similarly, Bengali Hindus and Kashmiri Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and Azad Kashmir and want to live in Union of India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi muslims, Punjabi Hindus, Kashmiri Hindus and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to Bangla Muslims of East Pakistan, who created Bangla nation state Bangladesh without Indian Bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims (and Azad Kashmir without Kashmiri Hindus). As simple as that.
We Punjabi Sikhs have no problem living in a Punjabi Muslims or Punjabi Hindu majority Punjabi nation state but non Sikh Punjabis don't support idea of nation-state unlike modern civilised world but a state based on religion.
The Punjabi speaker population of Muslims is around 10 crore. Punjabi speaking population of Hindus is around 3 crore (Punjabi Hindus in Punjab, Himchal, Haryana, Jammu and Delhi). Punjabi speaker Sikh population is around 2 crore. Hence Sikhs would be minority if both Punjabi muslims and Hindus or either one of them come form a Punjabi nation state with us Sikhs. We Sikhs have no problem living as minority in Punjabi nation state among majority Punjabi muslims and Punjabi Hindus, But their radicals minds prefer religion over their nationality and they love to give up their Punjabi nationality and adopt Hindi and Urdu nationality in order to create a state based on their respective religions.
So when Sikhs alone form a Punjabi nation state, it would automatically be a Sikh majority Punjabi nation state called Khalistan. What's in the name? We are open to change the name and keep it Punjab instead of Khalistan and also write the word secular state in constitution because it wouldn't change anything in practice. In practice it would still be Khalistan just like India is a Hindu rashtra in practice regardless of its official name or regardless of its constitution..
N
He is right as a kashmiri we are just silent because of guns
We have problems man
Honestly speaking the reality and he is the best one from all of them
No India🇮🇳, No Pakistan🇵🇰, No China🇨🇳.
Kashmiri:- (iok)
1 lakh+ civilian
6600 pellets
300+ Women
1000+ Houses
😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭.
Silent Message from kashmir, Warna Masla Hoo jayai ga😭
😂hhahhahahhhahhaah
We also laugh at the things you suffer, you're the zomibies in our POV. Just Zombies @@gamingff5808
@@AD__Dar_ free kashmir from Indian and Pakistani oppression
May Allah ease all the pain and sufferings of whole kashmir ___KASHMIR ZINDABAD ♥️🥺
Love from Srinagar Kashmir mirwaiz Farooq saib love you our freedom leader
All eyes on Reasi 🙏🏻
He is landlord and Actual Leader of kashmir nation ..
The worst thing about suppression is that rebellion bounces back way stronger when suppression is removed
I think agar hum article 370 tootne ke tym uthe hote to aaj itni problems humko face nahi karni padti
This is sad reality I am in Kashmir and it is 100 percent right .
Biggest liar.
@@hindu3048 I am in Kashmir from last 3 year ... This is true reality
Great story 👏
Qaid Mirwaiz umer Farooq ❤
Previously before 2019 he was saying there is no freedom of free will, expression etc. Now he is saying that Previously there was freedom but now there is no freedom
Bro if u r aware about the word COMPARISON then u would probably understand what he tried to say. In comparison to time before 2019, there was some sort of freedom of expression no ,after after expressing they were kept in prisons but after 2019 I don't think any kind of freedom of expression is being allowed.
But we all know netowns 3rd law of nature........
Omer Sahib speaks the reality on ground.May ALLAH SWT bless him.
Long live Mirwaiz E Kashmir
Creepy people
I am still waiting wire coverage on Reasi attack, instead of single reporting on horrific attack,wire reporting on those who are behind such attack…so should not we think wire is running Pakistan agenda on Indian soil…
Ajencies are responsible
We completely understand the pain & deeply saddened over this unfortunate incident
But brother you need to understand since 2019 JK is completely under control of Delhi govt, yahan parinda b par nhi mar sakhta Delhi ki marzi k bina
JK is the world's militarized zone , how attacks like Reasi & Poonch are happening
Who is responsible?
Whose failure is it?
Gobar bakat sirf godi media ka suna gaa@@Syedaji957
Ofcourse it's govt failure,quram and it's jihad against non muslims has nothing to do with this😂😂😂@@Syedaji957
@@sunilforu3723
Manipur mai konsa jihad aur musalaman hai
Legend Of Rayasat e kashmir
In this Interview or Monologue? Where is the follow up question..
He and his wife had great respect for the totalitarian and brutal China the liquidator of Muslims. Never spoke highly of the great democracy India.
Government should get close to Kashmiris to solve the problem of kashmir
We Kashmiris are against all types of violences, we want to live peacefully. We are victimized on all fronts, we are being killed, jailed, maligned while doing some inhuman acts with the help of agencies and then blaming Kashmiris. Kashmir issue needs one time solution without beating around the bush.
Love you mirwaiz from kashmir❤
There is no difference between India and Pakistan in terms of freedom of speech and expression these days. In India in India speaking against Hindu nationalism is a crime against country while in Pakistan speaking against establishment is animated towards the sovereignty in dignity of that country.
Okay expert.
We want POK back...
Mirwaiz umar farook always lives in my heart and he is only trustful leader of Kashmiri population ❤
That heart will fail for sure.
Mirwaiz should allow the journalist to ask questions....let it not be unilateral..
We never support violence
we love peace
Hmm that's why genocide of kashmiri pandit happened there
You people don't want anything you people just working for Pakistan
Adam seeker, ex muslim sahil, sameer, faiz, sachwala, sajid imam, angel, Quranwala apostate prophet, deeni bhai, SANATAN SAMIKSHA, HEATED DEBATES, SATYA SANATAN, Gems of Christianity 🌵🌵🌵🌵🌵🤣🤣🤣😢😢😮😢
@@amankumar55555 hmm that's why Pakistan don't want bjp government who's there fevriout party
@@filmypopcorn8192....grow up buddy ....only 200 to 700 pandits were killed.....why r u talking only for them what about this ...haannn????.....Jammu Massacre (1947)October-November 1947: In the Jammu region, thousands of Muslims (estimates range from 20,000 to 237,000) were killed during communal violence that followed the partition of India. The violence involved local Hindu and Sikh groups, with alleged support from the forces of the Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir.Post-1947 Incidents1990sJanuary 21, 1990 - Gawakadal Massacre: At least 50 Kashmiri Muslims were killed when Indian security forces opened fire on protestors in Srinagar.March 1, 1990 - Zakoora and Tengpora Massacre: Between 33 and 51 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian security forces in Srinagar.January 25, 1990 - Handwara Massacre: 21 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by the Border Security Force (BSF) in Handwara.May 21, 1990 - Hawal Massacre: At least 70 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian paramilitary forces during a funeral procession in Srinagar.October 1, 1990 - Al-Faran Kidnappings: While primarily involving foreign tourists, the incident also led to the killing of local Muslim residents during subsequent clashes and operations.April 1993 - Bijbehara Massacre: Around 51 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian security forces in Bijbehara during a protest against the siege of the Hazratbal Shrine.2000sMarch 24, 2000 - Chattisinghpora Massacre: 35 Sikhs were killed in this massacre; during subsequent investigations, 5 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian security forces in a controversial encounter, alleged to have been framed as militants.August 1, 2000 .2010s2010 - Protests and Clashes: Over 100 Kashmiri Muslims were killed in clashes with Indian security forces during widespread protests in the Kashmir Valley.2016 - Post Burhan Wani Killing: Over 100 Kashmiri Muslims were killed during the protests and clashes following the death of militant leader Burhan Wani.
We want basic issue should be addressed according to aspirations of people of j&k .....
The leader of Kashmir❤
People of Kashmir actually have the anxiety about kashmir issue...bcz our people lies in Pakistan's admintered kashmir......so pakistan and india should adress the issue
Free Kashmir
Free Jammu from Kashmir Jammu want separate state from Kashmir
Mir waiz❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Love from sopore
We are not free..voice from south kashmir
Right sir.,...
#freejammukashmir
Leave if u want
I n From J and K
jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India
Go to Pakistan If u have any problen
@@kashyapraina3122 I want pok with j and k
@@kashyapraina3122 indian settlers have to go back, Kashmir belong to Kashmiris
@@cyke1234its our land we will not leave
Arfa is brilliant, we Muslima are proud of you
Freedom of expression does not mean freedom from India. Kashmiris and narrative created by few media channels seems to be that Kashmir problem is that they need expression to join with Muslim brethren country Pakistani. This dream will not get fulfilled as there can be no further partition on basis of religion. Unless Kashmiri do not live like any other Indian citizen peace will always be lacking.
Right 👍
But dear brother Indians must also consider Indian Muslims as India's citizens...
@@bhatbasit1119 Behave like Indian and there is no one to stop you being Indian. Every family will have differences but brothers don't kill the mother that feeds.
@@surge2vin thank you brother. I'm Indian and Indian is mine. My goal is just to make India the greatest. thinking, caring , feeling about every citizen is my prime obligation ❤️
@surge2vin, Kashmir is a disputed territory shared between three nations. Period.
Salute to wire
Peace 🕊️🕊️🕊️
Mirwaiz: our great leader ❤
always speaking far kashmari people .Allah blas you sir.
We will rise 💪! LONG LIVE KASHMIR ❤
Thank you wire for giving platform to anti national to carryon their agenda , you really doing great service to nation, souls of innocent Hindu dying in various attacks in Kashmir are admiring wonderful work done by wire by promoting anti national
Always play the victim card.
Right sir
It's the high time you should come into the mainstream.
For Kashmir to be truly free, every Kashmiri must raise their voice against violence.
Stop calling g these terrorists as freedom fighters and Mujahideen
They are actually cowards. Only cowards kill innocent civilians. If they were really freedom. Fighters they would be fighting the army face to face, not attack slyly like they do.
Anyone who supports violence, makes excuses for them, justifies their actions or gives them a voice calling g them youth icon is party to the violence.
Why do the leftists always give voice to smugglers, terrorists and those who act against the law.
Yes stone pelting incidents drastically came down ...no more friday hartals..shopkeepers freely opening their shops without any fear from separatists...unlike other states every citizen of jk getting benefit from ayushmaan bharat without investing a single pinny from his/her pockets.....but Arfa didn't like this...Although still problems are exist in kashmir but is improving ...l
🌻🍀
Saying absolutely right this kashmiri leader...
I respect all kashmiri leaders
Jai Hind
Thank you.... Bro...
India must take proper steps to resolve the problem.India and Pakistan fighting for Kashmir while China is taking advantage from both sides. Already China made pakistan as puppeet. Infia should have come forward to pak before China did but politics of religion and hatred has made everything opposite so far.
Free
Free Kashmir
All eye on reasi
All eyes on Manipur.. ...Too
@@selfengineering1331 Jo bus pe attack hua wo quram me jihad shikhaya jata he non muslims ke khilaf
Bhai... Thoda study kiya kar..
Warna barbaad hoga...
Leader is one who is able to take everyone together without distinguishing them on the basis of caste religion etc
Brar extra decency mereko dikha rha h
Tawaif k sath wo b chal kr
Tawaif jo h thi
dont wory dear kashmiri....pakistani are coming to teach them in their own language....the language of gun...they will understand as usa and nato understand in afghanistan
U just tell a Kashmiri what u want but without any pressure or fear he will 100% tell we want freedom from India we want to live separate Freedom is our birth right bczz hindu and Muslims can never unit better is to live separate
Welfare and development of his people is NEVER his priority and that is what the people want.
His only concern is Pakistan and what they esp his "well wishers" over there think. And that 👆 is completely unacceptable to anyone who has a normal mind Full Stop 🙏
Development has no significance when your internal peace is snaped
Whatever you say doesn't make any sense. The biggest welfare that you can think for your people is Freedom. And that's what they are fighting for. For the future of Nation.
Andhbakhts have nothing to say without pakistan , pakistan.. pakistan 😅
Mirwaiz ❤
I have a question to him kashmiri population was totally under hurriyat command.if they don't want the locals people go for gun culture so when the condam gun culture and militant attacks why they donot boycott gun even they boycott election with mix up with jamat e islami now same jamat is requesting to contest elections,,
All eyes on Reasi
Now he is nostalgic about vajpayee. But during vajpayee days he was supporting pakistan.
Great leader mirwaiz of Kashmir
Open borders so ppl can see each other. Policy now is inhuman and zulim
After long time Mirwaiz given interview..hum taras gayee Thay...
Mash Allah lekin sehat bahut achi thi itni gurbat mein....
@@durgeshsingh5220cow meat khatey hain hum. Tum b khao sehat tumhari b achi hogi
Our leader young Farooq..
Earlier they are free to support Pak..so sad bro 😂😂
Where lies the problem
I find it difficult to understand
Actually India has had a problem with Kashmir since beginning which is persistent in character
And the persistent nature alienate people of Kashmir from the rest of India
Guthi ko suljana mtlb ?
Like you take care of millions of Indians do own kashmiris as well sincerely
Definitely you will see the change
Isme riddle kaha pr h
Azadi ki bhi ek seema hoti hai
And who will decide that SEEMA?
@@gowherreshi6468 right of people
Long live kashmir❤
This is not an interview but a monologue. Hurriyat supports negotiations with Pakistan and this is the Pakistani verison of Kashmir settlement because Pakistan knows that they can't fight us.
Our position must never change PoK and China occupied Ladakh should be given to us and that's all that needs to be negotiatiated.
20 years that all it takes to reset a generation so this insurgency will end by the time we reach 2050 so just 25 year from now. But our position and posture must remain the same.
Free Kashmir Free Punjab
Let all States of India free from Union. Then some one like will engulf Us.
Why Should India Be Divided into Multiple Nation-States
India (Republic of India) didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1861. Turkey didn't exist before 1922, Germany didn't exist before 1871, Saudi Arabia didn't exist before 1932 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 18th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms everywhere around world. Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Denmark, Poland, Switzerland, Slovenia, Netherlands, lechesiten etc were created after fall of 1000 yrs old Holy Roman empire in 1806. Italy and Germany were created in 1861 and 1871 by merging various small kingdoms of Italian and German nationality. Similarly all European countries were created based on their respective nationalities after the fall of empires and kingdoms across Europe.
After the fall of the 600 yrs long Ottomans empire in 1922, many countries were created based on their nationalities.Saudi Arabia didn't exist When Prophet Muhammad was born in Mecca.Turkey was created in 1923 and Saudi Arabia was created in 1932 after the fall of Ottomans Empire in 1922. Europe and Middle East was united under various empires and kingdoms for most of the history just like India. India was the name for the region east to river Indus. It was never a country before 1947 but a region or subcontinent where various empires and kingdoms existed just like in Europe, Middle East or other parts and continents of world.
Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Arabs, Persian, Kurds, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality or where a single nationality dominates culturally, politically, in economy and military is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe or 'civilised world' are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations.
There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations or multinational countries. Nations are Punjab, Kashmir, sindh, Baluchistan, Gujarat, Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu etc. And in modern civilised world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities.
Among the 650 major nations in the world, the nations in the union of India are one of the largest nations in the world. After Han Chinese Mandrain, Spanish, Anglo Saxons English, and Arabic
Bengali - world's 5th largest nationality
Punjabi- 10th largest nationality in world
Marathi- 13th largest nationality in world
Hindustani- 14th largest
Telugu- 15th largest nationality
Tamil- 17th largest nationality in world
Gujarati- 24th largest nationality in world
Bhojpuri- 25th largest
Kannada- 29thth largest
Malyalam- 30th largest
Oriya- 32nd largest
Maithili- 40th largest
Awadhi- 46th largest
Assamese- 65th largest
Haryanvi, Marwari, Magahi, Deccan, etc in top 100 nationalities of world.
(Hindi, Urdu are not nationalities but artificial languages developed from Hindustani language and imposed on some nations in some regions, with only few native speakers. These regions have their own nationalities and languages. Hindustani is a nationality in western Uttar pradesh with Hindustani as native language).
Republic of India was created in 1947 out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities (unlike in rest of civilised world) but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions.
On the other hand, Bangladesh is a nation state which was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971 (5th biggest nationality in world). No other nation in the British empire (except Bangla nation) got sovereignty and independence. The sovereignty of all nations changed hands from British empire to two newly created empires based on religions. British empire just transferred ownership rights in 1947.
Three predominant civilisations in Republic of India, Indo Aryans, Dravidian and Sino Tibetic ( North East nations in the Republic of India) don't share anything although the first two civilisations share religion hence religion is the biggest binding force of the country followed by Military Power which is used to occupy non Hindu nations (Punjab, Kashmir, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya) with the country. Most of Hindus in Indian subcontinent prefer religion over their nationalities unlike muslims (Kashmiri, Bangla, Baluch, Sindhi, Pashto) who identify themselves with their nationalities and even support nation states like Bangladesh.
According to research, Higher ethnic or national diversity within a country negatively affects economic growth through conflict between interests of various nations or ethnicities (Don't confuse the ethnic or national diversity with the multiculturalism in west due to migration, the migrants mix with diverse society and become part of nationality of the host country and work for the interests of the dominant nationality).
High 'nationality or ethnic' Diversity correlates with low GDP per capita.
Strong democracy correlates with ethnic or national homogeneity.
Punjab and Kashmir should be a free countries based on Punjabi and Kashmiri nationalities like Bangladesh. But Hindu Punjabis, Hindu Kashmiris don't want to leave unions of india so Punjabi Sikhs, or Kashmiri muslims can't force them to follow to support the idea of Nation-States. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion.
Similarly, Bengali Hindus and Kashmiri Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and Azad Kashmir and want to live in India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi Hindus, Kashmiri Hindus and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to Bangla Muslims of East Pakistan, who created Bangla nation state Bangladesh without Indian Bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims (and Azad Kashmir without Kashmiri Hindus). As simple as that
I think Arfa Khanam ko ye Interview karna chahiye tha
Wire reporters seems like all belonging to same madrasa..
Situation is worst
India has invested lakhs of crores in Kashmir for it's development..we have given roads, electricity, schools, colleges, govt jobs, railway station, airport, tourism, hospitals and what not for development of Kashmir..our Army has made innumerable sacrifices to protect Kashmir from militancy..and what Pakistan did in Kashmir..they have brainwashed and radicalised Kashmiri locals and given them stones, bombs and guns to fight against India..it's ehsaan faramoshi on part of people who still support pakistan despite getting so many perks and privileges from India..even in the wildest dreams of such people can they imagine Pakistan sustaining them with a begging bowl in their hand..Pakistan couldn't even sustain their own country..forget about POK..
Ur army has also made some inhumane activities. There is no need of funding, also we too pay taxes like all other Indians, koi bheek nhi mil rahe hai. Forget about pak think of ur own country first
@@Shah-zi3gh If you are an Indian Kashmiri then forget the bitterness and enjoy India's world cup Win today 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 😀🔥🔥🔥🔥🎊🎊🎊🎊
@@Goldensongs1 congratulations to ur team but we never supported india. Nice "joke-forget bitterness"
@@Shah-zi3gh i seriously doubt if u r a Kashmiri..i have been to Kashmir many times...and locals there fully support India as they are educated enough to understand what is beneficial for them..siding with a rising nation like India or a beggar nation like pakistan
@@Goldensongs1 keep creating ur own happy world. I feel sad for u ppl that u r being fooled in this era by ur so called media. I think less than 1% of kashmiris would be happy with india including politicians. If u know kashmir Is the most militerised zone in the world, if kashmiris feel OK with india why so much forces?
I'm from Kashmir. After a years of quiet he again frustrated
👏💯🙏🇮🇳💯👏
Hipocracy at his peak.
80 percent of kashmiri youth's on tihad jail. From many years.
i am from MP state 😊 or yaha hindu majorty me hai hume bhe spacial status chiye taki muslims ki jansankhyaa yaha na badhe. agar kashmir ko spacial status chiye kyuki vo ☪️ majorty me hai isliye😅
Mirwaiz umar farooq zindabad
Free Kashmiri❤❤❤❤
We will Rise Again ✌️
10 साल में जितना मोदी ने अडानी और कॉरपोरेट के लिए किया, उतना अगर देश के आम नागरिकों के लिए करदेता तो आज भारत कहीं आगे होता !
Pakistan ne kiya tha. Aaj unka halat dekho😂😂
Mirwaiz umer farooq zandabaad.
Sir u are right
Modaniji the Liar, the hypocrite and the dictator.
Dictatorship avi dekha kaha hai tumlog , esko Dictatorship nhi kehte hai , dictator to China ka xi jingping, Zara dekh to video ki muslim ke saath kya kya hota hai china me
@@amankumar55555 Modaniji is india's Xi, but yes Modaniji is few years behind Xi. China doesn't have a Muslim problem, China has an Uyghor problem, that's very different from having a Muslim problem, but I understand that Andh Bhakts don't care about fact or logic, they are injected with the supremacy injection & being told that not Hindus (Muslims, Christians,...) are the enemy,... the same been done by Hitler & Mosolini previously!
That's how Power hungry Modaniji rules, just based on British Divide & Rule Bloody dirty politics 😑
This man's wife is European😅😅😊
Come on man he is married to his cousin
So?
He should be behind bars.
He is inciting youth of Kashmir.
He is inciting youth to do good and what is bjp/rss doing ??
Everyone knows who is the culprit
Kashmir is muslim majority state India illegally occupied
Tera abhu kashmir ha kya india tha ha or rahaga
pak de diya 😂...
Pura Akhand Bharat Hinduo ka hai...
Wait kro Taliban arhy hen. Preshan nhe hona . USA.NATO ko deka Afghanistan men.aur India k investment. Afghan army ko training ka Kia howa.
Mehmod ghaznavi.ahmad shah abdali.sultan ghuri ko bhool gy
Then you mean hindu majority country India is only for hindus?
Today's India belongs to Modi and Amit Shah while today's Pakistan belongs to establishment. Both the countries have retracted from the policies of the four fathers like Gandhi and Nehru in India and Jinnah in Pakistan.
Yeah we wish Nehru should have let Vallabhai Patelji handle the issue of Kashmir. Nehru withdrew forces and gave it to UN. He tied the hands of indians . Kashmir once capital of knowledge…it had great scholars and sharada university. May Kashmir find its old glory soon 🇮🇳
@@ayahuascaa9455 weather Kashmir belongs to India or Pakistan it will decided by sword only not someone's wish for aspiration. Weather Kashmir belongs to India or Pakistan it will be decided by sword only not someone's wish our aspiration.
@@aarifnabi6677our ancestors are same our DNA is same (including Pakistanis bangla and Afgan) what is provoking to pick up sword? Nail it down to that point. Ask yourself if that prevails over everything? Do you want Kashmir be another Afgan?
Biased reporting by biased media. This looks like Indian version of Jal Jazeera
#justiceforeasi
Youth don't even apply for loan mudra etc it seems even fear to get some source of income, that is vikas
ZALM HKUMAT INDAN 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Such a terrible man. Exile him
All eyes on Reasi !!
🙏❤